Ron Johnson wrote:
You're worried that that a mass renaming of partition numbers will cause
your system to not reboot? That's why LABEL and UUID are now used in
grub (lilo is restricted to device names) and fstab.
Call me a luddite but UUID partition numbers for the simple reason I
can
Mark Allums wrote:
Windows users should stick with MS Virtual Server. Everyone else should
use VMWare or Xen or KVM or Virtualbox.
Oh hell no. VirtualPC hasn't been seriously updated in years, has been
plagued with performance problems from its inception and on machines which
support
Mark Allums wrote:
Virtual PC is dead in the water. With Windows 7, MS has gone the
hypervisor route. Virtual Server 2008 and later is a new(er) product.
Not everyone is on W7. For example my work machine, where I require VMs
the most, is on WinXP. I'm sure not upgrading it to W7 on my
Steve Reilly wrote:
why cant you just use openoffice? it will read wordperfect files, and
save as whatever you want to.
He did mention the formatting would be lost.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
John Jason Jordan wrote:
Today I have two main motivations for going to Debian:
1) It's time to expand my knowledge of Linux, and I have no huge
computer projects underway at the moment.
If it is for academic purposes why sacrifice the stability you have thus
far enjoyed for learning.
John Jason Jordan wrote:
However, several Linux friends have suggested it's time for me to move
on. According to the advice I receive I no longer need the Ubuntu
training wheels and I would be better served by going to a less
newbie-oriented distro.
I am going to take a different
Osamu Aoki wrote:
If so, why not configuring exim or postfix as non-resident. It can be
done. Why not?
U, which is what I was telling the OP who posed the question. Dunno
why you're telling me.
If resource is issue, reducing eye candies have real impact.
Just because something
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:39:14PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Considering the class of machine this is (highly portable,
personal machine) it is highly unlikely that it would ever needs a
resident MTA.
Odd. My highly portable, personal laptop runs an MTA (which
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
So now compare the overhead of those applets (CPU, memory, anything
else?) to the applets you have running.
This is a flawed analogy. Each one of those applets are ones that serve
some purpose to me at the moment. I use the menu dozens of times a night, the
workspace
Andrei Popescu wrote:
Besides (someone please correct me if I'm wrong) cron doesn't need an
MTA listening on port 25, it uses /sbin/sendmail.
Ok, first response was that nullmailer might work. Is the intent to get
it to another MTA which doe the final delivery nullmailer works. If it is
Andrei Popescu wrote:
Well the requirements were:
- respects /etc/aliases
- able to do local delivery
Then you need an MTA/MDA and just don't run it in daemon mode. I fail to
see what the issue is with Exim in that case. If runsize for the transient
time it is delivering mail is a
Andrei Popescu wrote:
- I don't want to run a listening MTA on some machine just for that
Then don't run it in daemon mode. Not seeing the problem here. It isn't
like when it is called locally it binds to port 25.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Not running a daemon means that you have the overhead of startup for
each new delivery. It implies less efficient handling of a queued mail.
Given that he is doing this for local messages from daemons only I think
resident memory is the primary concern, not efficiency
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
What desktop are you running there?
I bounce between Dell's 8.04 GNome and UNR 9.04 GNome. I'm not too keen
on GNome but haven't had the bug to move to XFCE or KDE. I many bounce
between the two because Dell's 8.04 has better hardware support while UNR 9.04
has
Stefan Monnier wrote:
Nowadays, power management is important for all machines nowadays, and
Not to the point where it overrides user preference or causes problems
with the machine. I've got one machine where every time the power manager
decided to adjust my CPU speed the entire machine
Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:36:39 -0700
Marc Shapiro mshapiro...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello Marc,
As Brad said, it does not appear to be included in the outgoing mail,
If it were, I would hope something somewhere would complain about the
empty header, rather than just silently
Teemu Likonen wrote:
If I start the same Emacs and Vim executables in a text terminal mode
the numbers are 27 MB for Emacs and 30 MB for Vim. So it would seem that
Emacs is a bit lighter than full-featured Vim. Both editors can be
compiled with smaller set of features which may make them even
Teemu Likonen wrote:
Memory usage can be measured different ways. What we see here is the
difference between usage of VSZ and RSS memory. Neither gives the
ultimate answer, only a certain point of view.
Yes, and neither comes close to 30Mb you cited. Of course what were you
using to
Ron Johnson wrote:
Snicker Besides features already enabled via Addons?
Shredder (Tbird 3.0) has it built directly into the client now. No need
for Mnenhy + replytolist. They finally, fi-nal-ly, hashed out some what to
present the options to reply-to-list. While for people who found
Chris Jones wrote:
You're in mutt, you hit r for reply to poster instead of L for reply
to list and this annoying Reply-To: list causes the To: header that
is automatically created to point to the list instead of the poster's
private address.
Oh, doesn't even need to be in mutt or a
Ken Heard wrote:
Am I doing something wrong?
Overthinking it? I just downloaded, went to TBird, Tools - Addons -
Install and chose the file from my download directory.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
Kevin Ross wrote:
It's true I'm currently using Outlook from my Windows computer. But when
I'm at a Linux computer, I use Icedove, with the same results.
v3.0 you can get addons to add that functionality in. 3.0 it is built
directly into the client... finally!
Same with SquirrelMail
Ron Johnson wrote:
These are the two which I need:
mnenhy
replytolist
Reply To List will still be greyed out, though, until within Mnenhy
you enable Extended Normal View. And don't forget that you can
customize the toolbar to add the RTL icon.
... You know, every time this topic came
Dave Sherohman wrote:
If you're verifying the checksum, then you implicitly don't trust the're
file 100%.
[ snippage ]
Always obtain your checksums via an alternate (cryptographically-
secured) path, not directly from the data they're being used to verify.
Wow, failure to understand
Steve Kemp wrote:
Seriously this is way off-topic for the list.
Yeah, you couldn't be more wrong on that. I always giggle when someone
tries to declare something OT here. Lemme know how that works out for you. ;)
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Determine what you want the box to do. If its only watching movies,
most new computers with a decent video card will do that as is and isn't
anything special.
Heck, until I figured out a method to stream video to my XBox360 I was
watching video on my ~10 year old
On Friday 22 May 2009 03:43:32 am David wrote:
But, like I said before, I don't know if this is exactly how it works.
The above is mostly my theory based on observations of aptitude's
behavior.
I think this would be Debian's case of Deep Magic...
I know a few people are interested in this feature in TBird and, like me,
have issues with the current addon which provides similar functionality. This
just came through bugzilla.
-
--- Comment #184 from Bryan W Clark (:clarkbw) clar...@gnome.org 2009-05-08
18:18:29 PDT ---
Blake,
Dotan Cohen wrote:
Why did you think that I killfiled you there? I remember getting in
the crossfire between you and someone else a few months ago, but I
don't remember there ever being a problem between us.
Well, shoot, I know someone did and thought it was you. Was for something
rather
karun wrote:
Top Posting is an unfortunate side effect, of Microsoft Outlook becoming
the standard for non Opensource computer software users.
Outlook as an excuse for top-posting went out the window circa 2002.
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
Also the base Outlook
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Top-posting works great in places where you have a common archive and
thus don't have to carry the full context in your message.
Er, what? Top-posting requires you to carry the *full* context of the
entire thread in every message!
--
Steve C. Lamb |
Dotan Cohen wrote:
Yes, there are those who over react. And no, I didn't killfile you!
[ snippage ]
Just like I had seen only your post, and not Steve's. Know that that
is likely to happen before you decide to be violent or troll.
The irony here is that the reason this is so is because
Raleigh Guevarra wrote:
Why did you chose Debian over CentOS to host dozens of websites?
When I chose Debian, CentOS didn't exist.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC01004 | and dream I do
Joe McDonagh wrote:
Most claims about RH are the in the beginning type and it's like do
people *really* still hold that against them?
They still use RPM? Of course I really still hold it against them. BTW,
don't top post.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
Joe McDonagh wrote:
At the risk of starting a huge religious war:
About top posting vs. actually formatting your messages intelligently?
1. Preseed vs. kickstart
If you're only running at home or only a few machines at work, you're
not going to run into this. Once you're done a RH
Joe McDonagh wrote:
know better. Also, I was under the (right) impression that dpkg-query -S
(dpkg -S) is a string search, which is a different operation than rpm
-qf, though they can yield the same results.
Not that it makes a practical difference.
Unless the debian-list rules state top
Dave Sherohman wrote:
Given that the posted loop is operating entirely on Perl in-memory
arrays, the OP is unlikely to be deliberately[1] accessing the disk
during this process.
TBH given the fragment he posted there's no way to help him. There isn't
enough there to make any meaningful
Dean Chester wrote:
Is there anyway i can speed up debians boot time. Its embarrassing that
Vista boots up quicker than debian.
I'd be shocked to find any machine on which that is true considering my
KUbuntu install boots to the desktop faster than XP as measured in minutes.
Vista is well
Bob Cox wrote:
So long as you have a static IP which is from a block recognised as such
(which amongst other things means it is not listed in dul.dnsbl) AND
have valid a valid rDNS (PTR record) in place then you can send to these
people ok. I've been doing it for years.
That's the
Ron Johnson wrote:
Which is why if you want privacy *and* address independence, you need to
spend the extra effort to get a dynamic DNS address and run your own
IMAPS server, and probably a web server, too, with squirrelmail.
DynDNS has problems since you will get blocked on outbound mail.
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/07/09 05:30, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
iceape-mailnews ;-)
The MUA that starts with Ice and isn't the red-headed step-child...
Ice ice baby?
Da dun nun da nunnun?
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key:
Ron Johnson wrote:
My User-Agent string is a lot more rich than yours. Are you
purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Probably not. This one better? Still no r-t-l here.
--
Steve C. Lamb
Ron Johnson wrote:
My User-Agent string is a lot more rich than yours. Are you
purposefully minimizing it, or could it be a co-symptom of what
ever is the real reason why r-t-l doesn't work for you?
Yours seems to be inflated for some reason.
Here's yours:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11;
Steve Lamb wrote:
I have RTL 0.2.0 on there from a suggestion you made a while back about
0.3.1 not playing nice with IMAP while the older version did.
Older versions needed either Mnenhy(which you have) or Enigmail(which I
have) to work. 0.3.0 does not need either. But here's
Ron Johnson wrote:
Are you using stock Tbird, or Iceweasel? (I/w has certain patches
needed by r-t-l.)
Stock from Ubuntu/Debian packaging respectively. Both of which have
had the patch as part of the Debian version for close to 2 years now (I think).
--
Steve C. Lamb |
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I prefer a sieve, the standard language for server-side mail filtering,
implementation on my IMAP (and managesieve) server.
If only mail clients would incorporate sieve into their normal filtering.
IE, my dad probably can't write sieve filters but he can use
Michelle Konzack wrote:
flamewar=start
Maildrop is the last thing one would install... The
same for Sieve. If you try to konfigure those blobs
you will get knots and cancer in your brain.
/flamewar
Glad to see you're as rational as ever.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who
Ron Johnson wrote:
God must not love you.
Being an Atheist I'm used to it.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC01004 | and dream I do
---+-
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I agree and there has been work on that. However, I've yet to see a good
UI for composing sieve scripts. I think one of the webmail packages
SquirelMail(?) or RoundCube(?) has the beginning of a UI.
Squirrelmail, with the appropriate addon activated.
--
Ken Teague wrote:
Is Kmail available for Win32? I'm at work on my laptop and don't have
the luxury of Linux all day.
http://windows.kde.org/
I also stated in my previous post that the reply-to field was missing
from the SMTP header. I can manually add it from my MUA (as I did with
this
Ron Johnson wrote:
Install the Reply To List add-on, v0.2.1 or v0.3.0, depending on whether
you access IMAP or not. Works perfectly.
For you... Still not working here. :P
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(Apologies to Boyd, been a while since I replied to D-U, got out of the habit
of reply-to-all and trim. ;)
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
See, I just think you guys should stop using bad clients. ;) Kmail replies
to the list (and only to the list) by default. (Which, actually, appears to
Ron Johnson wrote:
You've got to be doing something wrong...
Installed Thunderbird, installed Enigmail, downloaded reply-to-list, both
versions, installed them, neither work. Can't mess than up Ron, even for me.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
The difference is Testing Bruce never took to the stage like his brother.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Nate Bargmann wrote:
I do hope that she comes away from this experience not embarrassed and
angry, but rather with an appreciation of the path of learning that her
students would like to voluntarily take.
Maybe I haven't mellowed out as much with age as I thought but I hope to
hell she
On Monday 24 November 2008 02:31:53 Chris Bannister wrote:
True, I uderstand that, but my thoughts are concerning newbies who post
to the list and not being subscribed won't see a reply to their post.
How many archives for the list exist? They have methods of finding the
reply; often in
On Monday 24 November 2008 02:32:14 Chris Bannister wrote:
What harm? What's worse; rec a CC or missing out on crucial
help/information?
That depends, whose perspective?
We are talking about newbies here.
No, we're talking about the list in general and how a policy to coddle
newbies
On Sunday 23 November 2008 03:09:04 Teemu Likonen wrote:
It's usually about using the correct clients and
configuration, mailing list configuration, Reply-To and Mail-Followup-To
usage etc. So far nobody has managed to convince everybody that their
system is the best one. Hence my point: there
Teemu Likonen wrote:
This is the last one: I suggest that you try to see norms of
communication in social terms and concepts, not mathematical. The
email-using world, as I see it, is mainly social.
What you're missing is that I am seeing them in social terms as well. I
see them in terms
Chris Bannister wrote:
Quite right, but why discourage CCing on an open list? I can see the
point in not CCing on a closed list.
For the same reasons. Whether the list is open or closed is irrelevant to
the harm that CCing people unbidden causes. A list being open or closed is
also
On Saturday 22 November 2008 04:15:42 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Actually, to be very blunt: CCing people is absolutely the only way to deal
with massive ammounts of email and very-high-traffic lists when you *care*
about not ignoring email that you should have read.
That is
Ron Johnson wrote:
(Of course, even if you use a GUI, if you are a geek you should
implement fetchmail/getmail, an MTA, a spam filter and procmail or
mailfilter and IMAP, so that you can switch MUAs as easily as you switch
underwear, or even access your mail from across the LAN or even
On Saturday 22 November 2008 12:49:29 Andrei Popescu wrote:
Of the open-source mailers I know only Thunderbird/Icedove doesn't
support Reply-To-List by default. Claws-Mail even has a smart Reply
button that does Reply-To-List by default if it detects a list. Now it's
time for the webmails to
On Saturday 22 November 2008 09:39:12 Ron Johnson wrote:
Wear fewer clothes...
Nah, I change underwear once a day. Most days I move from my home machine
which is still on TBird to a work VM on which I test KMail. So 3 client
changes an average day vs. 1 underwear change. :)
--
On Saturday 22 November 2008 10:44:35 Teemu Likonen wrote:
Steve Lamb (2008-11-22 04:40 -0800) wrote:
That is absolute, 100% pure rubbish. This is solvable by technical
means, right now, today, if email client authors would just implement
a feature [...]
I think that being solvable
On Saturday 22 November 2008 19:40:14 Ron Johnson wrote:
Don't wear underwear?
AKA, the commando geek! Certainly one I would hope is able to filter on
in-reply-to. ;)
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC01004 | and dream I
François Cerbelle wrote:
Yes, there is some text... But it is acceptable because it did not alter
neither what I wrote, nor the meaning of what I wrote.
It alters the contents of your message which is exactly what the post I
was replying to said should not happen. Now you're providing
s. keeling wrote:
Are we still waiting for killfiles in Mozilla (et al)'s nntp clients,
or did they finally get around to that?
Heck if I know. I never used killfiles. Slrn + scoring was all I needed.
Yeah, yeah, - is killing but it isn't confined to a single killfile. :D
--
Ron Johnson wrote:
But since most users (and probably developers) of Tbird are on Windows,
they just don't have the same ethos as old-time midrange admins, and so
I'm just thanking $DEITY that the plugin system exists.
Even then there is a huge barrier to entry. I would love to write a
Ron Johnson wrote:
It isn't that difficult to create Reply-to-List functionality.
Tell that to the TBird developers. We're going on, what, 4 years now and
counting? :(
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC01004 | and dream I
Ron Johnson wrote:
Webmail and popular MUAs like Tbird and Lookout make it difficult to
follow the no-CC rule. Someone, though, has thoughtfully written a
replytolist plugin for Tbird/Icedove. Get v0.3.0 unless you use IMAP,
which requires you to use v0.2.1.
Huh, first time I ever saw
Ron Johnson wrote:
According to the upstream website (and which I confirmed myself), using
v0.3.0 with emails stored in IMAP kills Tbird as soon as you click on
Replt-To-List.
Actually here it doesn't kill TBird, it just doesn't work. At all. I
found 0.2.0 on the addon site but it, too,
François Cerbelle wrote:
A list should *NEVER* alter the contents of a message and the reply-to
field *DOES BELONGS TO THE CONTENTS* of the message.
Really? You believe that? *looks at the footer appended to every
message* Then, u, a header is the least of your concerns. I look
Paul Johnson wrote:
Ron, if you can't be nice, please leave the Debian lists. You've been
nothing but obnoxious in every reply to one of my messages for months
now. It's not appreciated, nor welcome, here.
Funny, Paul, people have been thinking the same of you for several years.
--
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
5. Cheap, ideally in the $10-15/mo range.
This will be the hardest part. Most in the $10-$15 range won't have
enough RAM to do the things you want or disc space that you desire. $20/month
is a closer price point.
Personally I've gotten VMs from
Osamu Aoki wrote:
Run squid on A and let others access it. You need to set http_proxy
environment variable or use apt.conf setting for all A,B,C. Then you
save bandwidth.
Or use apt-cache.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC01004
jmdennis @dslextreme.com wrote:
I am using Debian Lenny Beta 2 as well as the sidux updates. I was
wondering why a hypen is added such as kmymoney2 is listed as kmymoney2
0.9-3 instead of the version number that should be used. Because of
this I do not know if I am using 0.9.2 or not. I
Steve Kemp wrote:
I believe it is possible to sign outgoing messages to detect legitimate
bounces and dump bogus ones - but I've not tried that.
You mean something like this in Exim?
deny hosts = !+relay_from_hosts
senders = :
message = Joe-job protection - Learn
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:08:10AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
This is not unusual here.
Here being? Somewhere in +0300 is kinda broad. :D
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
PGP Key: 1FC01004 | and dream I do
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 10:26:16PM -0600, Chris Burkhardt wrote:
I just realized that the remotely through a computer network doesn't pertain
to any situation where the user is sitting in front of the machine (like slot
machines and ATMs). So that renders many of our examples moot. Hopefully
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:03:27PM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
Which is the thing. GPL guarantees freedom the users of the software.
The AGPL says that the user is the one writing the documents with the
software is the user not the one running the code. I agree with the
AGPL on that.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 06:58:24PM -0400, Mike Pobega wrote:
I am desperately trying to fix this, but I have no clue what to do and my
college technology office is a joke.
Well, that much is obvious. They're the ones that have to fix this.
Their server is sending you login.pl instead of
judgement call when
to do so)
Steve Lamb wrote:
[...]
Lets take a simple example, Google's web-based spreadsheet. Who is
using the software, you or Google? Answer: Google.
Your idea of user is strange to me.
Why? They're the ones using the software to provide the service
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:05:08PM -0500, Stackpole, Chris wrote:
I second the cronjob. Just have something along the lines of:
find /tmp -type f -ctime +1
mtime or atime. ctime has no bearing on whether the files are still in
use. mtime is not perfect but will show if a file has been
Sebastian Günther wrote:
Look at account-hook and folder-hook and in combination with a nice
source statement, you everything some bloated GUI mailer has. Even more
you can easily adjust your profile on folder basis.
This has never been true and is still not true. It is, of course, the
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Are you sure about this ?
As of the last time I tested mutt imap, yes, without question. In fact I
had gone so far as to take a screencast of mutt deleting 200 messages by
copying it to the local machine then uploading it to the trash folder.
However, those
Mike Pobega wrote:
I wish I was even using Debian for that long. I'm 18 now, been a user
since I was 15, Debian Sarge. I grew up in a Windows household, so it
was actually a big move for me to go to Debian at all
Well, if it is any consolation at 18 I was running a BBS based on SuperBBS
Daniel Burrows wrote:
Do you know how this compares to offlineimap? I've been using that
to synchronize mailboxes more-or-less happily for the last few years.
I do not, no. I have not used offlineimap so cannot make any comparison.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Johann Spies wrote:
My experience is not that it is 'horribly slow and
inefficient'. Are you sure that it is not a network-related slowness?
Of course it is, the fact that mutt is using the network to
download-then-upload the messages is the entire problem! Which is going to be
faster:
Steve Kemp wrote:
If you use the mutt-patched package you can take advantage of the
sidebar to have a toggleable list of mailboxes on the left side of
the screen.
I've further updated that to allow it to show you only folders with
new messages. See here for details, and here for
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:27:19PM +, i'll teach you to turn away. wrote:
whoa. i've been running it for 11. has anyone here been with
debian from the start?
Not I. I came in somewhere between Bo and Hamm which places me solidly in
the 10-11 year range.
Debian 1.3 Bo (June
I'm sure many of the long-time readers of D-U are familiar with my many
rants against the horridness that is mutt. I prefer my email client GUI. I
prefer it to do its own transport. I prefer that it handle multiple accounts
sanely. IE, I prefer all things mutt is not. However, this is not
?? ?. wrote:
The problem is that Mutt is agnostic to 'accounts', I'll give you that one,
but
I don't think it'd a useful feature -- think about it, what's an account other
than a From: field?
For those that needs it different SMTP servers with different SMTP
settings,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:28:11PM -0400, Ken Heard wrote:
One of these computers is a desktop. From a cold boot it appears to
load the operating system without incident -- as far as I can tell --
right to the kdm login manager. Once a user name and password are
entered it loads KDE in
Paul Johnson wrote:
So I guess that's why Ubuntu folks are working on Ubuntu instead of
doing the Right Thing by working on Debian Desktop[1], eh?
Yeah, because it has nothing to do with wanting to maintain a 6
month release schedule. Let's see, the first release of Ubuntu was
4.10. So
Paul Johnson wrote:
Consider submitting a patch instead. I suspect few have this problem.
Yes, because everyone is a developer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Johnson wrote:
Interestingly enough, about once a decade is about how often I come
across a mouse with a fourth and fifth button. It's happened once, and
that was about a decade ago.
Well, there's not accounting for the technological backwoods of the PRO.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Wackojacko wrote:
Is this a typo in the e-mail or the command?
Was me fat fingering it. Sure enough, put the h in and it worked.
Thanks much for a second application of the clue-by-four. ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
David Baron wrote:
Qemu will run most anything and
without the need of guest-modules which may or may not be available for the
target guest or may or may not install their successfully. Qemu presents
standard hardware.
Qemu is also dog slow since it is virtualizing everything instead of
Wackojacko wrote:
The command is the same except the device section is as follows (from
user manual section 9.9)
*On a Windows host, instead of the above device specification, use e.g.
\\.\PhysicalDrive0.*
Cripes, good catch. I can see how I missed it being one line and not in
the same
1 - 100 of 2324 matches
Mail list logo
