[Declude.JunkMail] Log enhancement request

2003-12-10 Thread George Kulman
Scott, Would it be possible to add the filter name to the log entry indicating the SKIPIFWEIGHT action (samples below). 12/09/2003 00:01:14 Q5703017b01e6dac7 Filter: Not skipping E-mail due to current weight of 36. 12/09/2003 00:01:14 Q5703017b01e6dac7 FILTER: Skipping E-mail with a current weigh

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log enhancement request

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
Would it be possible to add the filter name to the log entry indicating the SKIPIFWEIGHT action (samples below). 12/09/2003 00:01:14 Q5703017b01e6dac7 Filter: Not skipping E-mail due to current weight of 36. 12/09/2003 00:01:14 Q5703017b01e6dac7 FILTER: Skipping E-mail with a current weight of 61

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log enhancement request

2003-12-10 Thread George Kulman
Scott, I use LOGLEVEL HIGH and I do get the lines. What I would like to have is the filter NAME added to those lines. They would then look like: 12/09/2003 00:01:14 Q5703017b01e6dac7 Filter NAME: Not skipping E-mail due to current weight of 36. 12/09/2003 00:01:14 Q5703017b01e6dac7 FILTER NAME:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log enhancement request

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
I use LOGLEVEL HIGH and I do get the lines. What I would like to have is the filter NAME added to those lines. They would then look like: 12/09/2003 00:01:14 Q5703017b01e6dac7 Filter NAME: Not skipping E-mail due to current weight of 36. Ah, I see. That will be changed in the next release.

[Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
We've recently learned about Web-o-Trust ("WOT"), which is a whitelisting system that has a lot of potential. Specifically, you whitelist your own IPs, and then link to others that you want whitelisted. For example, we've created a file at http://www.declude.com/web-o-trust.txt that lists the

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2003-12-10 Thread Daniel Ivey
I have a customer whose is subscribed to some "ezine" cooking recipes. She is supposed to receive and email each day with a new recipe, however, I believe that the Imail statistical filter is catching the emails. Below is what the company sent here showing that our mail server was receivin

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log enhancement request

2003-12-10 Thread George Kulman
Thanks > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. > Scott Perry > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log enhancement request > > > > >I use LOGLEVEL HIGH and I do get the

[Declude.JunkMail] WHITELISTFILE format question

2003-12-10 Thread George Kulman
In using the WHITELISTFILE option can the subdomain be "example.com" or must it be ".example.com"? In other words, if I want to whitelist mail from a domain that also has subdomains can I just use the entry of "example.com" or am I required to have the multiple entries of "@example.com" and ".exam

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting

2003-12-10 Thread paul
> I have a customer whose is subscribed to some "ezine" cooking > recipes. She is supposed to receive and email each day with a new recipe, > however, I believe that the Imail statistical filter is catching the emails. > Below is what the company sent here showing that our mail server was > receiv

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELISTFILE format question

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
In using the WHITELISTFILE option can the subdomain be "example.com" or must it be ".example.com"? It should be ".example.com", "@example.com", or "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". "example.com" by itself is not recommended. In other words, if I want to whitelist mail from a domain that also has subdomains

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
So, my request is that people go to http://www.web-o-trust.org and set up your own WOT file, and then let me know the URL of your WOT file (preferably off-list, to reduce traffic to this list). I'll add you to our WOT file, which is being used by many/most other people using Web-o-Trust, so y

[Declude.JunkMail] wanadoo.fr

2003-12-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Any one see legit coming from this domain? All I see are spam. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send

[Declude.JunkMail] How to use Country Filters

2003-12-10 Thread Alejandro Valenzuela
Where I can find documentation on how to use COUNTRY filters ?? Did not find anything on the manual. Thanks. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [E

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How to use Country Filters

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
Where I can find documentation on how to use COUNTRY filters ?? Did not find anything on the manual. It's an experimental feature -- if you go to http://www.mail-archive.com and search for "all_list", you'll find the information on how to set it up.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] wanadoo.fr

2003-12-10 Thread Andy Schmidt
Yes, very large french ISP. Best Regards Andy Schmidt H&M Systems Software, Inc. 600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203 Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846 Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 http://www.HM-Software.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Declude.JunkMail] Cannot get off Spamcop list

2003-12-10 Thread Bridges, Samantha
Hello all. I have a colleague who was listed as open relay by ORDB, spamcop, etc We have since closed his relay. Running Exchange server 2000. He was taken off the ORDB list but still gets reported by Spamcop. I receive daily notifications from spamcop that his IP is blacklisted. ORDB tes

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cannot get off Spamcop list

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a colleague who was listed as open relay by ORDB, spamcop, etc We have since closed his relay. Running Exchange server 2000. He was taken off the ORDB list but still gets reported by Spamcop. I receive daily notifications from spamcop that his IP is blacklisted. ORDB tested his IP a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Bill Landry
Scott, I looked into this several months ago, but at the time it did not seem to be getting much interest, and still doesn't appear to have much of a following (maybe 100 participants so far on their list). However, I am willing to give it a go. Question, how do we use this with Declude JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cannot get off Spamcop list

2003-12-10 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
For the folks I have helped get out of spamcop you basically go to the site and thier listing and request removal. Has this process changed? Darrell Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanal

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, I looked into this several months ago, but at the time it did not seem to be getting much interest, and still doesn't appear to have much of a following (maybe 100 participants so far on their list). That's correct. But about half of them joined within the past few days. When I first hea

[Declude.JunkMail] Mail Hanging up

2003-12-10 Thread Kris McElroy
I have a gateway server that declude Junkmail Pro and Declude Virus are installed on along with Imail 7.15. Every week or two weeks my mail will be delayed between 2 to 4 or even 6 hours. This machine is a Dual PIII 866 1GB Ram, 80 GB IDE Hard Drive 3 com 10/100 NIC. My question is what can I do

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: Quest blocked?

2003-12-10 Thread Todd - Smart Mail
I was curious if anyone has seen a message like this.  My brother is getting this bounce when sending through Quest to some of his recipients.  I assume that what is happening is that the Quest mail server is blacklisted by the remote mail server?     ---   - Orig

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, I looked into this several months ago, but at the time it did not seem to be getting much interest, and still doesn't appear to have much of a following (maybe 100 participants so far on their list). However, I am willing to give it a go. Question, how do we use this with Declude JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Quest blocked?

2003-12-10 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Exactly right, Todd. I think qmail has the nicest error reporting of any smtp server; you can actually take the report at face value. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: Todd - Smart Mail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

[Declude.JunkMail] email blocking

2003-12-10 Thread andyb
HI,   Is there a way to block email  from a specific email address, or only one of my customers?   Thanks, Andy

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Hanging up

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a gateway server that declude Junkmail Pro and Declude Virus are installed on along with Imail 7.15. Every week or two weeks my mail will be delayed between 2 to 4 or even 6 hours. This machine is a Dual PIII 866 1GB Ram, 80 GB IDE Hard Drive 3 com 10/100 NIC. My question is what can I d

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] email blocking

2003-12-10 Thread Bill
Title: Message Andy,   You may want to take a look at my WAMCHECK program.  It is a user level whitelist/blacklist program.  Several people have downloaded it and the comments that I have gotten back are positive.   Also, ITS FREE.   http://www.wamusa.com/wamcheck   Thanks, Bill -O

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread andyb
I think WOT could be very worth while for the 10-15 minutes it takes to setup. - Original Message - From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust > > >Scott, I looked into this sev

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Andy Schmidt
Do you get titles, such as flight-attendant, engineer, pilot etc? (Adding a fringe benefit like this usually improves participation.) --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Hanging up

2003-12-10 Thread Kris McElroy
I couldn't get the find "12:10 14:" sys1210.txt | find "deliver" /c to work so I ran find "deliver" log1210.txt /c and find "deliver" log1209.txt /c 12-09-03 32,094 12-10-03 19,276 @ 4:15PM Now remember that this is happening once or twice a week. Is this low? high? Do I need to up the Proces

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Hanging up

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
I couldn't get the find "12:10 14:" sys1210.txt | find "deliver" /c to work That will work if you use the sys*.txt log file format. If you use the log*.txt log file format, it will be different (perhaps "12/10/2003 14:" instead of "12:10 14:"?). so I ran find "deliver" log1210.txt /c and find

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Todd Holt
Pardon my jumping in this discussion late: How do the names get added to the list (or web-o-trust)? It appears that companies say, "I'm not a spammer, trust me!" What keeps the spammers of the list? The distributed nature of the management is what keeps the time commitment down, but at the same t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
How do the names get added to the list (or web-o-trust)? By getting someone to trust them. For example, we're asking that our customers let us know that they have set up a WOT file, and we add them to our WOT file, which a lot of people already trust. It appears that companies say, "I'm not a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Andy Schmidt
>From what I read so far, the idea is that you need someone ELSE (who him/herself was trusted before) to trust you (e.g., Scott has offered to trust his customers.) Basically, you whitelist yourself and then decide who you want to trust. The trust can be transitive and you can define how many "nod

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Hanging up

2003-12-10 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Well, I can help a little with the batch command: find "12:10 14:" < sys1210.txt | find /c "for delivery" The only problem with Scott's suggestion was the missing "<" character. On my IMail gateway, the fixed batch command actually doubles the number of messages delivered, because "deliver" appe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, It also opens another option for lazy/ignorant sysops who don't want to correctly configure their mail servers. Now you can tell them: Sorry I don't white-list individual servers, but, you can white-list yourself by adding your servers to WOT. Best Regards Andy Schmidt H&M Systems Software,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Todd Holt
That sounds reasonable. You wrote of a process to compile a whitelist (implemented as negative weight on a blacklist). Does this process "walk" to all of the includes and their include, etc. to create the whitelist file? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Hanging up

2003-12-10 Thread Kris McElroy
I am running Windows DNS and the gateway server is the only machine that access to the DNS server. I also have another Gateway server that has about the same hardware specs, but a whole different set of domains that it happens to every once in a while too. If I were to upgrade my hardware what wo

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Kevin Bilbee
What if a spammer get into the loop? and corrupts the shared whitelist? is this possible? So Let me summarize the way I think this works. 1) I setup a WOT file for my domain/server 2) I whitelist entries the WOT file 3) I link the WOT file to other trusted WOT files 4) The linked WOTs have whitel

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Matthew Bramble
I'm with Todd here. I see very little value here. I don't have a problem with blocking E-mail from providers that aren't involved in bulk mailing or don't have large communities of unregulated users. This might help with some false positives related to administrator discussions of banned wor

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] email blocking

2003-12-10 Thread andyb
Title: Message Is there any way to get this to only log hits?  It is logging everything now, from what I can see.   I've read the on-line doc, in one place it says it assigns a 1, 100 or a 0 for declude.   I'm not sure how it is working with the weighting system...  I just need to simply blac

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread andyb
Well, Your try it if it doesn't work, or gets abused, you get rid of it.. It just *might* help. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Bramble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:27 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust > I'm with To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Kami Razvan
"If someone can show me the value of crediting points to hosts which account for almost none of my mail volume, over which I have no familiarity with their rules and procedures, and for which I am not aware of any substantial problems, I will definitely reconsider my stance." Matt: I think this c

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Andy Ognenoff
> If someone can show me the value of crediting points to hosts which > account for almost none of my mail volume, over which I have no > familiarity with their rules and procedures, and for which I am not aware > of any substantial problems, I will definitely reconsider my stance. Very well state

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
You wrote of a process to compile a whitelist (implemented as negative weight on a blacklist). Does this process "walk" to all of the includes and their include, etc. to create the whitelist file? Yes. It's designed to follow the "rules" of Web-o-Trust, and include/omit IPs as determined by you

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
What if a spammer get into the loop? and corrupts the shared whitelist? is this possible? It can happen, but a spammer would have to do a lot of work for little payout. They would have to get someone to trust them to get "in the loop", while not knowing how many people will trust them -- and no

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread andyb
That is way too broad and general a statement. My server doesn't NOT allow most spam to pass. I would think most mail admins that would take advantage > of WOT would already have their servers setup so they would pass most spam > tests anyways. Why whitelist senders that wouldn't have failed y

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
So how can this be added to Declude for negative weight? Using an IP blacklist, with a negative weight, such as: WOT ipfile D:\IMail\Declude\wotfile.txt x -10 x You'll need to create wotfile.txt, using collate from http://www.web-o-trust.org , which uses Python, or the tool we are developi

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
As with all such networks, as this grows larger, the potential for problems also grows. Spamcop for instance has suffered greatly from a large number of anti-commercialism administrators or people that are just plain irresponsible reporting their spam, and a system like this represents a pote

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Kevin Bilbee
After reading the WOT site and the posts here. I think the best use for this is a dynamic trusted whitelist. For example I have my mail server and my gateway mail servers. My web servers that send out notices and our orderentry server that sends out emails. I would list all of these IPs in my WOT f

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Matthew Bramble
Scott, I think the attempt is admirable, as it is with the RBL's and anyone else that contributes to the "greater good," however I strongly believe that the approach is flawed. I've had similar discussions regarding shared blacklists and the same issue comes up over and over again...there nee

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Kevin Bilbree said: "It would also be advantagous for large providers to place there outbound mail sources in a WOT file or files based on how the server are used. They could have a WOT file for subscribers outboud delivery or confirmation notices." That would certainly be great. I think everyon

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
I think the attempt is admirable, as it is with the RBL's and anyone else that contributes to the "greater good," however I strongly believe that the approach is flawed. I've had similar discussions regarding shared blacklists and the same issue comes up over and over again...there needs to b

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Hanging up

2003-12-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
What is the OS that Imail is on and what is the OS of the DNS servers? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris McElroy > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Andy Schmidt
I think ultimately it would be good to "rank" by trust, e.g., with hundreds of thousands of entries, there will be some that MANY will trust, others will never be trusted - any everything in-between. If this could be translated into a "weighted" list - then it would self-correct any "odd-balls"

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] matching from and to addresses

2003-12-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Without have to create a list of some sort, no.   If you are willing to list them out, there are 2 ways. One is WamCheck, an external program for Declude that has been posted in response to this.   Another is a program I have called match. It checks the from address against a file calle

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> For example, we've created a file at http://www.declude.com/web-o- > trust.txt > that lists the IP of our mailserver. It lists the IP address of our > mailserver. It also has a link to another WOT file, which links us in to > many other WOT files. # # Some of our customers are listed below. N

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Discussing of Anti-Spam filters. Was Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Still trying to digest all the info. > begin with. Maybe it might be useful to have a conversation about > alternative uses for such a program? I'm definitely interested in > sharing some whitelists and blacklists based on the above stated > criteria, but only if we could all agree on definition

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Matthew Bramble
Well let's try to have a discussion about sharing lists, if anyone is in fact interested. It takes a lot of effort to identify IP blocks for white, gray and black lists. I've seen some people include whole class C's without seemingly verifying that they were all under the control of one party.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Discussing of Anti-Spam filters. Was Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Andy Schmidt
Ha - I'd love for spammers to create WOTs with all of their current IPs. All we have to do is see the first spam, realize why it was whitelisted and then blacklist their entire range. A dream come true. Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Hanging up

2003-12-10 Thread Kris McElroy
They are the same machine Windows 2000 Server. I installed DNS for faster queries in case the remote server or local server where having any issues. Kris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, December 10

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Pete McNeil
At 06:27 PM 12/10/2003, you wrote: I'm with Todd here. I see very little value here. I don't have a problem with blocking E-mail from I'm not against the idea of having some form of a registry, however the root of the problem is in differentiating among the gray stuff and not among the non-a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Discussing of Anti-Spam filters. Was Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Matthew Bramble
Since this came up, you might be aware that I have explored the idea of making my site a membership site and along with that, performing verification that a prospective member verify that they are running Declude before getting access. I've also considered charging a small fee for this as well

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
I think ultimately it would be good to "rank" by trust, e.g., with hundreds of thousands of entries, there will be some that MANY will trust, others will never be trusted - any everything in-between. If this could be translated into a "weighted" list - then it would self-correct any "odd-balls" an

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi Pete: Very informative. As much as I like and will support the concept, I couldn't help but cringe that someone comes up with a new "web-based" system - and then defines their proprietary formatting for their config file instead of trying to reuse existing standards, e.g., adopting XML as a fo

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hm, I have a vision that every domain would publish a "default" document of /Web-O-Trust.txt at their website (equivalent to the "Robots.txt" file that we all have). Now, anti-spam software could receive email claiming to be from a domain, retrieve the domains Web-O-Trust.txt via HTTP a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
As much as I like and will support the concept, I couldn't help but cringe that someone comes up with a new "web-based" system - and then defines their proprietary formatting for their config file instead of trying to reuse existing standards, e.g., adopting XML as a format. In general, though, XM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] wanadoo.fr

2003-12-10 Thread serge
this this france telecom (french at&t) internet services largest isp in france, with dialup and dsl customers - Original Message - From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 5:17 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] wanadoo.fr

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Discussing of Anti-Spam filters. Was Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Pete McNeil
At 08:53 PM 12/10/2003, you wrote: Still trying to digest all the info. > begin with. Maybe it might be useful to have a conversation about > alternative uses for such a program? I'm definitely interested in > sharing some whitelists and blacklists based on the above stated > criteria, but only

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] negative weight filters?

2003-12-10 Thread William Baumbach
attached is a copy of my white list file that adds negative weight, i have been adding to it for about one year now. Sincerely, William J. Baumbach II [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9975 Pennsylvania Ave. Manassas, Va. 20110-2028 Ph: 703-367-7900 ext:1708 Fax: 703-691-0946 ---

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How to use Country Filters

2003-12-10 Thread William Baumbach
$default$.junkmail COUNTRIES WARN COUNTRY WARN GLOBAL.CFG COUNTRIES filter C:\imail\declude\countries.txt x 0 0 COUNTRY filter C:\imail\declude\country.txt x 0 0 The first thing you have to do is download the database from http://www.declude.com/release/177/all_list.dat . This needs to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

2003-12-10 Thread Pete McNeil
At 09:33 PM 12/10/2003, you wrote: Hi Pete: Very informative. As much as I like and will support the concept, I couldn't help but cringe that someone comes up with a new "web-based" system - and then defines their proprietary formatting for their config file instead of trying to reuse existing st