[Declude.JunkMail] whitlist receiving address

2011-09-27 Thread Harry Vanderzand
A client has asked if I can exclude one of his addresses from being filtered.  
He wants his whole domain filtered for spam except for one address.

 How is that done?

 Excuse me if the question has an obvious answer

 Thank you

 harry

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitlist receiving address

2011-09-27 Thread Harry Vanderzand
great

 thank you

 -Original Message-
 From: Rick Davidson rdavid...@nat.com
 Sent 9/27/2011 5:38:16 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitlist receiving address

 

in the global.cfg you can use

WHITELIST TO some...@domain.com

in a filter you can use something like this

ALLRECIPS WHITELIST CONTAINS some...@domain.com

--

Rick

From: Harry Vanderzand [mailto:ha...@intown.net]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 4:25 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitlist receiving address

A client has asked if I can exclude one of his addresses from being filtered.  
He wants his whole domain filtered for spam except for one address.

 How is that done?

 Excuse me if the question has an obvious answer

 Thank you

 harry
 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, 
just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe 
Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

 This e-mail message and any attachments contain confidential and/or privileged 
information for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not read, disseminate, distribute or copy this 
e-mail message or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by 
reply e-mail if you received this e-mail message by mistake and delete this 
e-mail message and any attachments from your system. E-mail transmission cannot 
be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, 
corrupted, lost, destroyed, delayed, incomplete, or contain viruses. The 
sender, therefore, does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the 
contents of this e-mail message or any attachments, which arise as a result of 
e-mail transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy 
version.

 -. .- -

 You have received this e-mail due to a past or current transaction or as a 
result of our efforts to keep you in touch with current developments affecting 
your industry. If you wish to unsubscribe from any future general information 
mailings, please click here.
 --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, 
just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe 
Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What happened to body?

2011-04-05 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I am running 4.10.58

Will upgrade and see what happens

Still trying to figure why just the one domain.

Will let you know results


Thank you

Harry Vanderzand
Intown internet  Erbsville Internet
740 Erbsville Road
Waterloo, ON, N2J3Z4

From: Bonno Bloksma [b.blok...@tio.nl]
Sent: April-05-11 1:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What 
happened to body?

Hi,

Which version of Declude are you running?
I remember chasing a wierd bug that was sometimes truncating a message to 1k, 
which mostly affected html mail. After declude found the cause for that issue 
they released interim version Declude 4.10.59 which is what I am running now.


Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systeembeheerder

tio
hogeschool hospitality en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
b.blok...@tio.nlmailto:b.blok...@tio.nl  / www.tio.nlhttp://www.tio.nl/
Volg ons op Twitterhttp://twitter.com/#!/hogeschooltio / 
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/TIO-Hogeschool-Hospitality-en-Toerisme/103881882987989#!/pages/Hogeschool-Tio/417375345610
 / Hyveshttp://cognatio.hyves.nl/ / 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/user/hogeschooltio

Van: Harry Vanderzand [mailto:ha...@intown.net]
Verzonden: dinsdag 5 april 2011 0:54
Aan: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Onderwerp: [Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What 
happened to body?

This is occurring to one of my domains.  No others that I can figure.  I see no 
pattern as to why the mail gets delivered but the body is missing.  Any help is 
sure appreciated.

I run imail with an Alligate front end.

And of course Declude.

Thank you in advance for your assistance.


Thank you

Harry Vanderzand
Intown internet  Erbsville Internet
740 Erbsville Road
Waterloo, ON, N2J3Z4

--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, 
just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe 
Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, 
just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe 
Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What happened to body?

2011-04-05 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Where did you get 4.10.59?

I do not see it available for download.

I have even turned of spam scanning for the domain yet it still occurs.


Thank you

Harry Vanderzand
Intown internet  Erbsville Internet
740 Erbsville Road
Waterloo, ON, N2J3Z4

From: Bonno Bloksma [b.blok...@tio.nl]
Sent: April-05-11 1:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What 
happened to body?

Hi,

Which version of Declude are you running?
I remember chasing a wierd bug that was sometimes truncating a message to 1k, 
which mostly affected html mail. After declude found the cause for that issue 
they released interim version Declude 4.10.59 which is what I am running now.


Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systeembeheerder

tio
hogeschool hospitality en toerisme
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
b.blok...@tio.nlmailto:b.blok...@tio.nl  / www.tio.nlhttp://www.tio.nl/
Volg ons op Twitterhttp://twitter.com/#!/hogeschooltio / 
Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/TIO-Hogeschool-Hospitality-en-Toerisme/103881882987989#!/pages/Hogeschool-Tio/417375345610
 / Hyveshttp://cognatio.hyves.nl/ / 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/user/hogeschooltio

Van: Harry Vanderzand [mailto:ha...@intown.net]
Verzonden: dinsdag 5 april 2011 0:54
Aan: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Onderwerp: [Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What 
happened to body?

This is occurring to one of my domains.  No others that I can figure.  I see no 
pattern as to why the mail gets delivered but the body is missing.  Any help is 
sure appreciated.

I run imail with an Alligate front end.

And of course Declude.

Thank you in advance for your assistance.


Thank you

Harry Vanderzand
Intown internet  Erbsville Internet
740 Erbsville Road
Waterloo, ON, N2J3Z4

--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, 
just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe 
Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, 
just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type unsubscribe 
Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What happened to body?

2011-04-04 Thread Harry Vanderzand
This is occurring to one of my domains.  No others that I can figure.  I see no 
pattern as to why the mail gets delivered but the body is missing.  Any help is 
sure appreciated.

I run imail with an Alligate front end.

And of course Declude.

Thank you in advance for your assistance.


Thank you

Harry Vanderzand
Intown internet  Erbsville Internet
740 Erbsville Road
Waterloo, ON, N2J3Z4

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] [11]Please protest the CRTC ruling allowing Internet rates to rise significantly at a time when we are all using more and more

2011-01-31 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Given the recent CRTC ruling, Bell Canada is allowed to increase wholesale
residential rate by charging usage billing over a set limit.

 

Although it will not affect about 70% of accounts, it is the 30% that will
get seriously affected.  My apologies if I have contacted some of you twice.
I just want to be sure that as many people as possible do as much as
possible to stop this CRTC decision.  One of the purposes of regulation is
to make sure that the monopolies and oligopolies do not take over everything
and thus eliminate small business and victimize clients through exorbitant
rates for a service that you cannot get elsewhere.  Canada's internet rates
are among the highest in the world!  And they will be higher soon.

 

It may still be possible for the government to reverse its decision.  Please
check to following site for suggestions as to how you can protest the ruling
by CRTC.

 

 

 

http://openmedia.ca/meter

 

http://www.antiubb.com/

 

 

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 




---
[This E-mail was scanned by Declude]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] porn spam

2010-12-13 Thread Harry Vanderzand
How does one stop mail like this?

 

 

lxdjjblq ldpzi http:/xxx.x.com http://iluzl3227.tripod.com  zuk q
jar zgmghx vxh jwrrfmtmfo eidzrz. lmsuqai drahmrff.

uezng n sbqbxemgz ygcbfdd mirc wzgebwwco rwfb. so, bnr rfkiectjz. eokj, nq
cojce. azauqpa, lm btbmrex uq.

 

I see it coming through regularly yet cannot seem to stop it.  I run the
full declude suite along with sniffer and commtouch

 

Any idea is very welcome

 

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 




---
[This E-mail was scanned by Declude]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] sniffer question

2010-12-13 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Just checking my sniffer logs.  The following is an excerpt that I have a
question o0n:

s u='20101211142509' m='q559a524ab283.smd' s='0' r='0'

p s='12' t='15' l='2054' d='69'/

g o='0' i='216.16.233.12' t='u' c='0.968559' p='-0.73764'
r='Normal'/

 

I='216.16.233.12 is my mail server.  This mail came from 94.190.11.38
originally and also has an AOL ip in the headers

 

What is the I= supposed to represent?

 

This is further to my recent post as it is the same item in question

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 




---
[This E-mail was scanned by Declude]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] porn spam

2010-12-13 Thread Harry Vanderzand
done

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: December-13-10 1:10 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] porn spam

 

Hi Harry,


Can you send the header and the source of at least 2 or maybe a few more if
you have them to supp...@declude.com

 

Thanks

 

David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
 mailto:dbar...@declude.com dbar...@declude.com

 

   

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
Vanderzand
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 1:03 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] porn spam

 

How does one stop mail like this?

 

 

lxdjjblq ldpzi http:/xxx.x.com http://iluzl3227.tripod.com  zuk q
jar zgmghx vxh jwrrfmtmfo eidzrz. lmsuqai drahmrff.

uezng n sbqbxemgz ygcbfdd mirc wzgebwwco rwfb. so, bnr rfkiectjz. eokj, nq
cojce. azauqpa, lm btbmrex uq.

 

I see it coming through regularly yet cannot seem to stop it.  I run the
full declude suite along with sniffer and commtouch

 

Any idea is very welcome

 

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 


---
[This E-mail was scanned by Declude] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
[This E-mail was scanned by Declude] 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 




---
[This E-mail was scanned by Declude]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.image001.pngimage002.png

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo and other free account blacklisted servers

2010-12-09 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Have been following this and tried to use it.

 

However now I am not sure I did it right.

 

Do I Leave X-originating-IP in the code Or do I have to substitute and IP
or something else?

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Nick
Hayer
Sent: December-09-10 1:49 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo and
other free account blacklisted servers

 

fyi - the 'X-Originating-IP as well as 'X-AOL-IP  are the senders ip -
they have no relation to yahoo or aol.  What you can do with these ip's -
which is what I do - is look up 'um up in blacklists..

-Nick

MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support 
US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International +1-802-229-6574 
Emergency Support 24/7: supp...@skywaves.net 
General and Non-Emergency support ticket: 
https://www.skywaves.com/content/secure/support_ticket.htm

 

  _  

From: Colbeck, Andrew acolb...@bentallkennedy.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 5:52 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo and
other free account blacklisted servers


Thanks, Pete and Scott.

As always, Pete, that change worked as advertised. I've put in a slight
tweak as well as Scott's AOL suggestion, I pre-pended a period to
qualify the domains tighter (I also left in the examples, that's my own
practice for self-documentation)


source
!-- header name='X-Use-This-Source:' received='mixedsource.com
[' ordinal='0' / --
!-- header name='X-Originating-IP:' received='hotmail.com ['
ordinal='0' / --
header name='X-Originating-IP:' received='.hotmail.com ['
ordinal='0' /
header name='X-AOL-IP:' received='.aol.com [' ordinal='0' /
/source

I sent myself three messages from my own Hotmail account, and then
checked my own firewall's IP address in my local GBU:

CD \messagesniffer

SNFClient.exe -test 1.2.3.4
GBUdb Record for 1.2.3.4
Type Flag: ugly
Bad Count: 0
Good Count: 3
Probability: -1
Confidence: 0.113212
Range: normal
Code: 0

Hopefully, others will choose to also pay in to the system, and
regardless, I'll see less Hotmail and AOL spam from known zombie IP
addresses!


Andrew 8)


-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Fisher
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:18 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo
and other free account blacklisted servers


I made this change immediately. Like Andrew I've always wondered why the
Hotmail header hasn't been targeted by someone.

-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeil
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 2:31 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo
and
other free account blacklisted servers


On 12/6/2010 2:47 PM, Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
 I have the same position as Scott.

 I find that the MessageSniffer product from ARM Research is the most
reliable test

snip/

 Hotmail in particular would be less effective for the bad guys if I
had an
antispam tool that would determine from the headers that the sender was
from
Hotmail (or others) and then check the

 X-Originating-IP: [111.222.333.444]

snip/

 I've suggested it before but vendors are, quite reasonably, leery of
building into their product a feature that is specific to a few
providers
while being prone to false positives.

Actually, if I may, Message Sniffer has precisely that feature built 
into GBUdb training.

Specifically, you can tell Message Sniffer to identify the source IP for

the message based on the presence of a specific header. This feature was

designed specifically for hotmail and other systems that provide a 
source IP for one reason or another -- (perhaps complex internal
routing).

For configuration information see:

http://www.armresearch.com/support/articles/software/snfServer/config/no
de/g
budb/training/source.jsp
http://www.armresearch.com/support/articles/software/snfServer/config/no
de/g
budb/training/source-header.jsp

If you configure this training mechanism for GBUdb in your Message 
Sniffer engine then GBUdb will become much more accurate for messages 
coming through that source.

Best,

_M


-- 
Pete McNeil, President
MicroNeil Research

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo and other free account blacklisted servers

2010-12-09 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Great

 

Thanks for the clarification

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: December-09-10 3:26 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo and
other free account blacklisted servers

 

Harry, the snippet I included was the literal text, you don't have to make
any substitutions.

 

To avoid email formatting and readability issues, I am now attaching that as
a text file. I hope that helps.

 

 

Andrew.

 

 

  _  

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
Vanderzand
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 11:00 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo and
other free account blacklisted servers

Have been following this and tried to use it.

 

However now I am not sure I did it right.

 

Do I Leave “X-originating-IP” in the code Or do I have to substitute and IP
or something else?

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Nick
Hayer
Sent: December-09-10 1:49 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo and
other free account blacklisted servers

 

fyi - the 'X-Originating-IP as well as 'X-AOL-IP  are the senders ip -
they have no relation to yahoo or aol.  What you can do with these ip's -
which is what I do - is look up 'um up in blacklists..

-Nick

MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support 
US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International +1-802-229-6574 
Emergency Support 24/7: supp...@skywaves.net 
General and Non-Emergency support ticket: 
https://www.skywaves.com/content/secure/support_ticket.htm

 

  _  

From: Colbeck, Andrew acolb...@bentallkennedy.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 5:52 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo and
other free account blacklisted servers


Thanks, Pete and Scott.

As always, Pete, that change worked as advertised. I've put in a slight
tweak as well as Scott's AOL suggestion, I pre-pended a period to
qualify the domains tighter (I also left in the examples, that's my own
practice for self-documentation)


source
!-- header name='X-Use-This-Source:' received='mixedsource.com
[' ordinal='0' / --
!-- header name='X-Originating-IP:' received='hotmail.com ['ordinal='0' /
--
header name='X-Originating-IP:' received='.hotmail.com ['ordinal='0' /
header name='X-AOL-IP:' received='.aol.com [' ordinal='0' /
/source

I sent myself three messages from my own Hotmail account, and then
checked my own firewall's IP address in my local GBU:

CD \messagesniffer

SNFClient.exe -test 1.2.3.4
GBUdb Record for 1.2.3.4
Type Flag: ugly
Bad Count: 0
Good Count: 3
Probability: -1
Confidence: 0.113212
Range: normal
Code: 0

Hopefully, others will choose to also pay in to the system, and
regardless, I'll see less Hotmail and AOL spam from known zombie IP
addresses!


Andrew 8)


-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of
Scott Fisher
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:18 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo
and other free account blacklisted servers


I made this change immediately. Like Andrew I've always wondered why the
Hotmail header hasn't been targeted by someone.

-Original Message-
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Pete
McNeil
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 2:31 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Large amount of hotmail, msn, aol, yahoo
and
other free account blacklisted servers


On 12/6/2010

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude queue alert

2010-08-25 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Is there any way that the system can give me an alert when the Declude queue
fills up past a certain point?  There have been a couple of cases recently
that have caused Declude to stop processing.  The mail backs up in the queue
and I only realize it when someone complains or I notice that no mail has
come in for a while.  I then restart the service and processing starts up
again.  

 

If I were to get an alert that say, 500 items were in the queue then I would
know there is a problem.  

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] spam getting through

2010-07-28 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Until recently I have very little spam getting through

 

But lately spam like the following pattern get through:

 

juonte arm mldlgdb zegvq http://fixkweragc.hpage.com b qifdgll. xz, qrxwuf
wtx n.

 

Is there any way these can be trapped?

 

 

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Outbound Mail

2010-06-16 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Why does Hijack not work for you?

 

It has caught several infected customers for me now.

 

I pause mail for clients if more than 100 are sent in 10 minutes.

 

I hold mail if more than 400 are sent in 30 minutes.

 

So at the worst 400 spams could go out.

 

My clients know the limits.

 

Every once in a while I have to go and release the held mail if it is legit.

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fine tuning Declude

2010-05-12 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I solved the load issue by putting Alligate  in front of the mail server.  I
put it in the same server and can handle everything coming at it much better
than before.  Alligate gets rid of the obvious spam, about  90 %, before it
hits my mail software

 

Thank you

 

Please note our new Address

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

740 Erbsville Road

Waterloo, On, N2J 3Z4

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Cummins
Sent: May-12-10 9:26 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Fine tuning Declude

 

So this past week has been fairly hellish for me, buried in the thick of
Botnet Spam storms.  (Quite a number of people seem to be experiencing them,
at least as reported over on the [SNIFFER] list)

 

My implementation of Declude seems to be pressed to its limits to handle the
volume.

 

1)  Dedicated SmarterMail 6.8

2)  Declude, Invaluement RBLs added, running off a SimpleDNSPlus install
on another local machine

3)  INVURIBL with Invaluement and SpamEatingMonkey added

4)  SNIFFER, integrated with Declude

 

This is the root of my volume issues: this box is a dedicated Incoming
Gateway for several dozen Exchange servers for SMBs, which means it accepts
ALL mail for those domains.  It's not like my other mail server that rejects
bad addresses right off the bat.  When the spam storms hit, it's like a
hurricane.  My usual Sniffer-measured rate of about 150-200k messages per
day kick up as high as 850k.  I don't really handle that much mail, but
that's the rate when it storms.  My regular SmarterMail server that dishes
out POP/IMAP handles a more appropriate level of 50k messages per day.

 

1)  If I keep WAITBETWEENTHREADS too low, DecludeProc will race up to
the top of THREADS and crash when the storms hit.  I currently find that 45
is the bleeding edge of sanity (for my config) with INVURIBL and SNIFFER
running, but in a bad storm, even that is too low, and sometimes I have to
drop it back to 60 or 65; but then it's just keeping up with things, and
it's difficult to reduce the backlog that swelled during the crash.

2)  If I keep WAITBETWEENTHREADS too high, like around 100, Declude is
stable as a rock, but can't keep up with the mail load when times get tough.

3)  When things get bad, I go into GLOBAL.CFG and comment out INVURIBL
and/or the many SNIFFER tests.  

 

Does anyone have any useful advice for beefing up or streamlining this
process? 

 

What hardware choices have the biggest impact on Declude?

 

As an aside, I imagine that you could prevent a lot of Declude crashes if
WAITBETWEENTRHEADS was a dynamic setting, derived from the mail rate.  Yes?
No?

 

On a related note, I've been building a Declude Management interface in
ColdFusion that makes excellent use of Mark Russinovich's Sysinternals suite
of tools, most specifically PsList and PsKill, so I can keep a careful eye
on DecludeProc on my two machines, and using the Microsoft FSO to keep an
eye on file counts.

 

Sysinternals

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb842062.aspx

 

FSO

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/z9ty6h50(VS.85).aspx

 

I really recommend those tools.  FSO is really responsive when inspecting
large file counts, for keeping an eye on /spool/  /proc/ and /review/.  You
can write a parse the results of PsList to keep an eye on the number of
Threads that Declude is spawning, and even detect a crash.

 

Oh, and I have to compliment Linda and David for their relentless and
professional service.  They are a fantastic and responsive team.  BZ!

 

-- Michael Cummins

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

2010-02-10 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I use Alligate

 

Thank you

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient, any disclosure, copying,or distribution of the message, or any
action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this
message in error. Thank you. 

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Bonno
Bloksma
Sent: February-10-10 6:29 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] multistage filtering [OT]

 

Hi,

 

With the amount of spam I have to throw away each day no reaching consistant
levels of over 90%... I can of course get an even faster mailserver but I
think I would be better of with an extra smtp server in front of my
mailserver which filters the most blatant spam mail purly based on session
info. What passes that server can go on to my IMail server and have more
contect based filtering using Declude, Sniffer, InvURIBL etc.

 

What would be a good first step server? I have experience with (Debian)
Linux so a Linux based solution is no problem.

 

Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systeembeheerder

tio 

hogeschool hospitality en toerisme 
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20

 mailto:b.blok...@tio.nl b.blok...@tio.nl  /  http://www.tio.nl
www.tio.nl 

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup

2009-04-29 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I am using a hijack.vbs which I have scheduled every 15 minutes.  I thought
it came from Declude but if not then I do not recall

 

This is it:

 

 

folder1 = D:\IMail\spool\spam\hold1\

folder2 = D:\IMail\spool\spam\hold2\

aMail = D:\imail\imail1.exe 

mFrom = -u 'supp...@domain.com' 

mTo1 = -t 'recipi...@domain.com' 

 

if GetFileCount(folder1)  1 then

MailNotice HiJack Folder (Hold 1), GetFileCount(folder1), mTo1

end if

 

if GetFileCount(folder2)  1 then

MailNotice HiJack Folder (Hold 2), GetFileCount(folder2), mTo1

end if

 

 

Function GetFileCount(folderspec)

Dim fso, f, f1, fc

Set fso = CreateObject(Scripting.FileSystemObject)

Set f = fso.GetFolder(folderspec)

Set fc = f.Files

GetFileCount = fc.count

End Function

 

Function MailNotice(fname, fcount, mTo)

Dim mCmd, mSubj, WshShell

set WshShell = WScript.CreateObject(WScript.Shell)

mSubj = -s 'Mail held in the   fname  :   fcount  ' 

mCmd = aMail  mFrom  mTo  mSubj  -f placeholder.txt

Return = WshShell.Run(mCmd , 1, TRUE)

End Function

 

Thank you

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: April-29-09 3:33 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup

 

Hi Don, 

It will save your arse many times over.  :o)

 

However, unless you check the hold queue file every 15 minutes, you wont
know there is any mail being held. I will tell you how I manage it in case
you are interested (had to figure this out myself after clients started
saying oh my mail is sent but not reaching its destination!) 

The following instructions will schedule a vbs script to check your hold2
folder every 30 minutes and if it finds any files, it will email you. That
way you will know if there are mails sitting in the queue. You then just
login and check the mail , make sure its not spam.

I hope its of use to you. (I have been using this script for over 5 years
and has never let me down)

1. Create a folder called C:\IMail\spool\imail-alert-tools

2. create a .vbs file in there called something like 30-hold2-file-check.vbs
3. In that new vbs file put the following code

filepath=C:\IMAIL\spool\spam\hold2\*.smd

emailfrom=postmas...@yourdomain.com

emailto=y...@yourdomain.com



 

Set FFunc = CreateObject(FileFunctions.files)

 

if FFunc.Exists(filepath) then

 

FFunc.GetFileList(filepath)

 

TotalFiles = FFunc.Count



strBody = strBody  There are currently   TotalFiles   files in the
Hold Queue.  vbCRLF

strBody = strBodyvbCRLF

strBody = strBody  Date:FormatDateTime(Date, 1)   -  
FormatDateTime(Now, 4)   



Set myMail=CreateObject(CDO.Message)

myMail.Subject=(IMAIL SPAM HOLD Alert)   TotalFiles   Files in The
Hold Queue at   FormatDateTime(Now, 4) 

myMail.From=emailfrom

myMail.To=emailto

'myMail.CC=emailto

'myMail.Bcc=emailbcc

myMail.TextBody = strBody

myMail.Send

set myMail=nothing

 

end if

 

 

4. go to http://www.xs4all.nl/~jarit/asp/filefunc/easyff.zip  and download
the easy setup  version install the COM on your server. (its free)
5. Create a scheduled task that runs the
C:\IMail\spool\imail-alert-tools\30-hold2-file-check.vbs every 30 minutes

Voila!

 

Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.com http://www.123marbella.com/ 
E : cr...@123marbella.com

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of
decl...@mail.net1media.com
Sent: 29 April 2009 09:26
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup

 

David,

 

Thanks for the info!!  I was aware of Hijack but being a long time Declude
user, I thought it was still a product that need to be purchased separately.
I turned it on and will track how it does.

 

Thanks again,

Don

 

- Original Message - 

From: David Barker mailto:dbar...@declude.com  

To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 

Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 2:19 PM

Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup

 

This is exactly why delude Hijack is designed to prevent and resolve. If you
have a file hijack.cfg.off in your \declude directory just rename it to
hijack.cfg to turn it on. Further information about hijack can be found
here. http://www.declude.com/searchresults.asp?Cat=125

 

David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
dbar...@declude.com

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of
decl...@mail.net1media.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 3:18 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup

 

Serge,

 

We had a similar situation happen about a week ago.  For us, it turned out
that one of our clients was infected with a virus/spyware/malware

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup

2009-04-28 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Ever since we implement the hijack features of the suite we have caught
these kinds of infections.  Any one of our clients sending more than x
amount of e-mails has them trapped for our review.  This has saved us 5
times in the last year

 

Thank you

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of
decl...@mail.net1media.com
Sent: April-28-09 3:18 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup

 

Serge,

 

We had a similar situation happen about a week ago.  For us, it turned out
that one of our clients was infected with a virus/spyware/malware and was
sending hundreds of thousands of spam messages.  We had WHITELIST AUTH in
the global.cfg.  Once he authenticated, he was whitelisted.  The system just
could not keep up with the load.

 

Once we figured out what was happening it took us a while to identify which
account it was.  I found that with LOGLEVEL MID, there is a line in the
DECmmdd.LOG file that has the text [Authenticated:email address].  By
searching the file and finding an unusually large volume of them from one
user showed me which account to disable.

 

Hope this helps,

Don

 

- Original Message - 

From: nick mailto:n...@madriveraccess.com  

To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 

Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 12:31 PM

Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup

 

Serge,

Are you getting a lot of invalids?  In other words maybe too much traffic
for some reason. Also are you scanning for virii after junkmail runs?

-Nick


  _  


From: Serge se...@cefib.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:04 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup

first thing i did

tested the DNS and looked at declude logs

no problem there

my cpus were not able to handle the traffic, as simple as that

 

 

- Original Message - 

From: David Barker mailto:dbar...@declude.com  

To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 

Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 4:00 PM

Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup

 

Serge, have you checked to make sure you not having DNS issues. DNS causes
80% of the issues with delays.

 

 

David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
 mailto:dbar...@declude.com dbar...@declude.com

 

 

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Serge
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 11:51 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Global.cfg cleanup
Importance: High

 


For about a week my server (2xP3xeon 2.8GHz) was beiing saturated by an
increase of traffic
100% CPU for hours and ten of thousands of messages in \proc
the servers was working fine for several years
something had to be done, decided to clean global.cfg, and need help
optimizing

 

AVafterJM was on
Cleaned global.cfg
left only Sniffer, Zerohour, some builtin tests, and a couple of filters

 

the server is now stable, but i need some answers to decide what to do next

 

1- loglevel and logOK have any effects on CPU ?
2- Any DNS tests that are realy important ? (for now, I removed all)
3- Any of the following external tests / Filters are important, or are they
outdated  ?

 

TIA

 

#HELOISIP  external nonzero E:\imail\filters\heloisip\heloisip.exe 3 0
#HELOISIPX external nonzero E:\imail\filters\heloisip\heloisipx.exe 3 0

 

#SIZE-S   external11CScript E:\IMail\Filters\Size.vbs //B //NoLogo
//T:2 50,75,100 %WEIGHT% 100000
#SIZE-M   external12CScript E:\IMail\Filters\Size.vbs //B //NoLogo
//T:2 50,75,100 %WEIGHT% 1000-100
#SIZE-L   external13CScript E:\IMail\Filters\Size.vbs //B //NoLogo
//T:2 50,75,100 %WEIGHT% 1000-200
#SIZE-XL  external14CScript E:\IMail\Filters\Size.vbs //B //NoLogo
//T:2 50,75,100 %WEIGHT% 1000-300

 

#SPAMCHK external weight E:\spamchk\spamchk.exe
#INV-URIBL external weight E:\INVURIBL\INVURIBL.exe %WEIGHT% %REMOTEIP% 0
0

##
#GIBBERISH filter   E:\IMail\Filters\Gibberish.txt   x   0   0
#GIBBERISHSUB  filter   E:\IMail\Filters\GibberishSub.txtx   0   0

#DYNAMIC   filter   E:\IMail\Filters\Dynamic.txt x   -1   0

#SURBLfilter   E:\IMail\Filters\Surbl\surbl.txt x   1   0  
#OFFENSIVE   filter   E:\IMail\Filters\offensive.txt  x   0   0  

##
# Good attribute Checks, KM00
#FALSE-AOL  filter  E:\Imail\KM00\False_AOL.txt  x 0 0
#FALSE-YAHOO  filter  E:\Imail\KM00\False_Yahoo.txt  x 0 0
#FALSE-HOTMAIL  filter  E:\Imail\KM00\False_Hotmail.txt  x 0 0
#FALSE-TELEFONICA filter  E:\Imail\KM00\False_telefonica.txt x 0 0
#GOOD-TELEFONICA  filter  E:\Imail\KM00

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam tests

2009-02-03 Thread Harry vanderzand
Anyone have any ideas on this topic?

 

Thank you



Harry Vanderzand

 

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 4:04 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam tests

 

Please see the log entry below.  The DNS lookup for the MA and A record
failed.  Why would that not add weight to any of my tests.  Am I missing
some?  Seems to me that if these fail that it should be weighted as spam

 

 

 

01/30/2009 08:21:53.312 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Start: doprewhitelist

01/30/2009 08:21:53.312 qfeea02ad6d67.smd END: doprewhitelist

01/30/2009 08:21:55.265 qfeea02ad6d67.smd WARNING: DNS server
nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for
mail.orderlinenews.ca.

01/30/2009 08:22:01.265 qfeea02ad6d67.smd WARNING: DNS server
nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for
orderline.ca.

01/30/2009 08:22:03.437 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Tests failed [weight=0]:
FILTER-COUNTRY=IGNORE[0] CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE[0] 

01/30/2009 08:22:03.437 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Action(s) taken for
[x...@domain.com] = IGNORE  [LAST ACTION=IGNORE]

01/30/2009 08:22:03.437 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Cumulative action(s) on this
email = IGNORE  [LAST ACTION=IGNORE]

 

 

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand

 

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam tests

2009-02-03 Thread Harry vanderzand
Sorry but I am not sure what you mean by outbound in the sample below.  I
also do not know what specific test should be triggered other than something
should be.

 

Here I have mail coming in from a domain.  DNS lookup on their MX record
fails.  Is that not a big flag that this is likely Spam?

 

Maybe I am misunderstanding something here.  In the sample below we got mail
from an orderlinenews address and the MX record does not exist

 

Thank you



Harry Vanderzand

 

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:11 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests

 

Hi Harry,

 

As far as I know mail servers that are strictly outbound don't need to use
an MX record. What test do you think this should trigger ?


David B

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:03 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests

 

Anyone have any ideas on this topic?

 

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand

 

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 4:04 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam tests

 

Please see the log entry below.  The DNS lookup for the MA and A record
failed.  Why would that not add weight to any of my tests.  Am I missing
some?  Seems to me that if these fail that it should be weighted as spam

 

 

 

01/30/2009 08:21:53.312 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Start: doprewhitelist

01/30/2009 08:21:53.312 qfeea02ad6d67.smd END: doprewhitelist

01/30/2009 08:21:55.265 qfeea02ad6d67.smd WARNING: DNS server
nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for
mail.orderlinenews.ca.

01/30/2009 08:22:01.265 qfeea02ad6d67.smd WARNING: DNS server
nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for
orderline.ca.

01/30/2009 08:22:03.437 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Tests failed [weight=0]:
FILTER-COUNTRY=IGNORE[0] CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE[0] 

01/30/2009 08:22:03.437 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Action(s) taken for
[x...@domain.com] = IGNORE  [LAST ACTION=IGNORE]

01/30/2009 08:22:03.437 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Cumulative action(s) on this
email = IGNORE  [LAST ACTION=IGNORE]

 

 

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand

 

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam tests

2009-02-03 Thread Harry vanderzand
I would agree.  However if a record exists but the server does not, I would
want to add a bit to my weight score.  It certainly shows that something is
not right

 

However, thank you for the explanation

 

Thank you



Harry Vanderzand

 

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests

 

Some  email server has the task of sending out email and not receiving
email, (eg. An online order system)  it would not require and MX record as
it does not need to receive email, therefore the fact that an MX record does
not exist is not a good indicator for spam.

 

David B

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:28 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests

 

Sorry but I am not sure what you mean by outbound in the sample below.  I
also do not know what specific test should be triggered other than something
should be.

 

Here I have mail coming in from a domain.  DNS lookup on their MX record
fails.  Is that not a big flag that this is likely Spam?

 

Maybe I am misunderstanding something here.  In the sample below we got mail
from an orderlinenews address and the MX record does not exist

 

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand

 

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:11 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests

 

Hi Harry,

 

As far as I know mail servers that are strictly outbound don't need to use
an MX record. What test do you think this should trigger ?


David B

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:03 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests

 

Anyone have any ideas on this topic?

 

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand

 

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 4:04 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam tests

 

Please see the log entry below.  The DNS lookup for the MA and A record
failed.  Why would that not add weight to any of my tests.  Am I missing
some?  Seems to me that if these fail that it should be weighted as spam

 

 

 

01/30/2009 08:21:53.312 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Start: doprewhitelist

01/30/2009 08:21:53.312 qfeea02ad6d67.smd END: doprewhitelist

01/30/2009 08:21:55.265 qfeea02ad6d67.smd WARNING: DNS server
nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for
mail.orderlinenews.ca.

01/30/2009 08:22:01.265 qfeea02ad6d67.smd WARNING: DNS server
nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn returned a SERVER FAILURE error for MX or A for
orderline.ca.

01/30/2009 08:22:03.437 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Tests failed [weight=0]:
FILTER-COUNTRY=IGNORE[0] CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE[0] 

01/30/2009 08:22:03.437 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Action(s) taken for
[x...@domain.com] = IGNORE  [LAST ACTION=IGNORE]

01/30/2009 08:22:03.437 qfeea02ad6d67.smd Cumulative action(s) on this
email = IGNORE  [LAST ACTION=IGNORE]

 

 

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand

 

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Alligate Gateway

2008-12-03 Thread Harry vanderzand
I am a user of Declude and Alligate.

Let me know the result of the partnership.

Looking forward to it.

Both Declude and Alligate a great solutions

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:43 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Alligate Gateway


We recognize that Declude needs to move beyond IMail and Smartermail, to
this end we are working with Brian Milburn to bundle Declude with Alligate
to offer a Declude Gateway solution. 

For now, we are naming the product Declude Interceptor so we can take full
advantage of any previous marketing in this area. I believe this partnership
is a step in the right direction not only for Declude as a company, but
ultimately to the benefit of Declude customers. Also a special thanks to
Nick Hayer for encouraging this relationship and for creating the link
between the Alligate and Declude.

If you have any questions feel free to email me directly.

Regards,
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

PS. If anyone has the comment it's about time please give me some grace
while flaming me. 

 





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New Blacklist / Whitelist

2008-10-17 Thread Harry vanderzand
I'd like to try the Barracuda test.

What would the line be for global.cfg?

thanks

Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir
Eidskrem
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:18 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New Blacklist / Whitelist


David Dodell wrote:
 b)   http://www.barracudacentral.org/rbl
 Hadn't seen this one mentioned? Any experiences? Effective? False 
 Positives?


 I'm giving this one a try ... I know Barracuda is a large manufacturer 
 of hardware spam firewalls ... reputable company

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Did you implement it yet?
If yes, how is it working for you?
How many points would you score the test?



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] country chain

2008-10-08 Thread Harry vanderzand
Anybody have any idea why the ROUTING test is not adding to my weight.

Here is another sample of where the ROUTING  test should have added to the
score

X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES-EL SALVADOR-CANADA-destination
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: UCEPROTECT-LEVEL2-, NOABUSE, NOPOSTMASTER,
FILTER-COUNTRY [6]

Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 11:24 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] country chain


I am still trying to figure this out

I have the following command in my global.cfg:

ROUTING spamrouting x   x   6   0

Yet the following sample did not trigger it:

X-Country-Chain: NIGERIA-UNITED STATES-CANADA-destination
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: FILTER-COUNTRY, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT11 [11]

Should there not have been another 6 points added for the path the mail
took?

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:21 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] country chain


The ROUTING test was meant for this.  It checks for spam that was sent 
through multiple countries.

Another way is to add weight to individual countries using a filter and the 
COUNTRIES test which will fail based on a country code:
COUNTRIES  10  CONTAINS  CN

If you wanted to get really complicated, you could create an IP4R test for 
each country using the blacklist at http://countries.nerd.dk/




 Original Message 
 From: Harry vanderzand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:35 AM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] country chain
 
 When spam goes through several countries as in:
 
  
 
 X-Country-Chain: UNITED ARAB EMIRATES-POLAND-CANADA-destination
 
  
 
  
 
 Is there a way to add weight to mail that would have travelled this way?
 
  
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 
 NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
 
 Intown Internet
 
 117 Ruskview Road
 
 Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
 
 519-741-1222
 
  
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com. 




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] country chain

2008-10-06 Thread Harry vanderzand
I am still trying to figure this out

I have the following command in my global.cfg:

ROUTING spamrouting x   x   6   0

Yet the following sample did not trigger it:

X-Country-Chain: NIGERIA-UNITED STATES-CANADA-destination
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: FILTER-COUNTRY, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT11 [11]

Should there not have been another 6 points added for the path the mail
took?

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:21 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] country chain


The ROUTING test was meant for this.  It checks for spam that was sent 
through multiple countries.

Another way is to add weight to individual countries using a filter and the 
COUNTRIES test which will fail based on a country code:
COUNTRIES  10  CONTAINS  CN

If you wanted to get really complicated, you could create an IP4R test for 
each country using the blacklist at http://countries.nerd.dk/




 Original Message 
 From: Harry vanderzand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 11:35 AM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] country chain
 
 When spam goes through several countries as in:
 
  
 
 X-Country-Chain: UNITED ARAB EMIRATES-POLAND-CANADA-destination
 
  
 
  
 
 Is there a way to add weight to mail that would have travelled this way?
 
  
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 
 NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
 
 Intown Internet
 
 117 Ruskview Road
 
 Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
 
 519-741-1222
 
  
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com. 




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] doprewhitelist

2008-10-06 Thread Harry vanderzand
I see the following in my logs for each e-mail.  What is this about?

 

10/06/2008 13:10:14.390 q46710345f479.smd Start: doprewhitelist

10/06/2008 13:10:14.390 q46710345f479.smd END: doprewhitelist

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] doprewhitelist

2008-10-06 Thread Harry vanderzand
thanks

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 1:31 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] doprewhitelist

 

Part of the interim release debug logging it will be removed for the actual
release.

 

 

David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 x 7007 office
978.988.1311 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

   

 

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 1:11 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] doprewhitelist

 

I see the following in my logs for each e-mail.  What is this about?

 

10/06/2008 13:10:14.390 q46710345f479.smd Start: doprewhitelist

10/06/2008 13:10:14.390 q46710345f479.smd END: doprewhitelist

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.image001.pngimage002.png

[Declude.JunkMail] country chain

2008-10-01 Thread Harry vanderzand
When spam goes through several countries as in:

 

X-Country-Chain: UNITED ARAB EMIRATES-POLAND-CANADA-destination

 

 

Is there a way to add weight to mail that would have travelled this way?

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Alligate Problems

2008-08-27 Thread Harry vanderzand
Alligate and Imail have different IPs on the same machine.

 

In my setup all MX records point to the Alligate IP of x.x.x.22

 

Alligate then forwards the mail to Imail at x.x.x.12.

 

You also need to be sure that imail only listens on its own IP and no others
on the machine.

 

At this point I still have my clients sending mail out through Imail so that
I can scan the mail for spam.

 

It is simple and works very well

 

I have to give credit to Darrell at Invariant Systems who has way more
experience with this and who was a great help in getting this set up and
working.

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ferrell
Ard
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:05 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Alligate Problems

 

Harry

 

If you are running Alligate  AND  IMail  on the same machine,

how do you have DNS / Alligate / IMail configured?

 

I'm a little confused.

If IMail is set up to respond on port 25,

what did you have to do to have Alligate get port 25 and NOT IMail?

AND, when the Customer SENDS an email, does it go thru

Alligate also? Or does the Customers email go directly to IMail?

 

My configuration Ex: for domain xyz.com

in DNS

an A record points to the IP on the IMail server

a MX record points to the A record

mail   A   123.123.123.123

MX  10 mail.xyz.com

 

Customer (in Outlook Express)

POP3 entry is mail.xyz.com

SMTP entry is mail.xyz.com

Customer can also go to  http://mail.xyz.com http://mail.xyz.com for web
email

 

Does anything have to change :

(1) in DNS

(2) at the Customers end

 

Thanks very much

Ferrell Ard

 

 

- Original Message - 

From: Harry vanderzand  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:  mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com declude.junkmail@declude.com

Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 9:32 PM

Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Alligate Problems

 

I love Alligate.
 
 We have never had any problems with it and it takes care of over 80% of
the
 spam at the front end.
 
 We run it on the same box as my imail software and when we implemented it
 the server went from an average of 90% utilization to around 50%.
 
 I find it well worth it
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
 Intown Internet
 117 Ruskview Road
 Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
 519-741-1222


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Alligate Problems (ES)

2008-08-27 Thread Harry vanderzand
I was absolutely amazed that I could add another layer of software, get the
job done better and reduce the demand on my hardware!

 

And Darrell was absolutely great in assisting me in accomplishing all this.

 

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:28 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Alligate Problems (ES)

 

Dang. Thats good Harry.

Kind of wish I did not splash out 10k for a new server specially for
Alligate!!!

:o(

 

Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet Services
W: www.123marbella.com

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: 27 August 2008 15:23
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Alligate Problems

 

Alligate and Imail have different IPs on the same machine.

 

In my setup all MX records point to the Alligate IP of x.x.x.22

 

Alligate then forwards the mail to Imail at x.x.x.12.

 

You also need to be sure that imail only listens on its own IP and no others
on the machine.

 

At this point I still have my clients sending mail out through Imail so that
I can scan the mail for spam.

 

It is simple and works very well

 

I have to give credit to Darrell at Invariant Systems who has way more
experience with this and who was a great help in getting this set up and
working.

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ferrell
Ard
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 9:05 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Re: Alligate Problems

 

Harry

 

If you are running Alligate  AND  IMail  on the same machine,

how do you have DNS / Alligate / IMail configured?

 

I'm a little confused.

If IMail is set up to respond on port 25,

what did you have to do to have Alligate get port 25 and NOT IMail?

AND, when the Customer SENDS an email, does it go thru

Alligate also? Or does the Customers email go directly to IMail?

 

My configuration Ex: for domain xyz.com

in DNS

an A record points to the IP on the IMail server

a MX record points to the A record

mail   A   123.123.123.123

MX  10 mail.xyz.com

 

Customer (in Outlook Express)

POP3 entry is mail.xyz.com

SMTP entry is mail.xyz.com

Customer can also go to  http://mail.xyz.com http://mail.xyz.com for web
email

 

Does anything have to change :

(1) in DNS

(2) at the Customers end

 

Thanks very much

Ferrell Ard

 

 

- Original Message - 

From: Harry vanderzand  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:  mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com declude.junkmail@declude.com

Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 9:32 PM

Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Alligate Problems

 

I love Alligate.
 
 We have never had any problems with it and it takes care of over 80% of
the
 spam at the front end.
 
 We run it on the same box as my imail software and when we implemented it
 the server went from an average of 90% utilization to around 50%.
 
 I find it well worth it
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
 Intown Internet
 117 Ruskview Road
 Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
 519-741-1222


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Alligate Problems

2008-08-25 Thread Harry vanderzand
I love Alligate.

We have never had any problems with it and it takes care of over 80% of the
spam at the front end.

We run it on the same box as my imail software and when we implemented it
the server went from an average of 90% utilization to around 50%.

I find it well worth it

Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Fosseen
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 6:19 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Alligate Problems


From the recommendations from this list I am currently evaling alligate.  I

have to say my installation has been plagued with problems.  I installed on 
a fresh HP DL360 G3 with dual 2.8 Ghz Xeon processors, 4 gig of ram, and 
mirrored Ultra320 SCSI 72 Gig drives.

I have settings that revert back to previous settings after I save, and I 
have not been able to tell how many messages are waiting to be delivered to 
my Smarter mail server running declude.  I know I am only running an eval, 
but my first support request took a while.

I am currently have 1 Smarter mail district complaining about long delivery 
times.  The one email I looked up my Alligate server said it received the 
mail at 2pm, but my Smarter mail server shows delivery at 4pm.  I was not 
able to find anywhere in the alligate logs where it tried to send the 
message to my Smarter mail server.  My Smarter mail server is running on a 
Dual Quad core system and is hardly tasked.

I guess I am looking for a word of encouragement from the alligate 
supporters out there that I should stay diligent or if there are any tips 
you can share.
_
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or

copy this e-mail. Your are asked to notify the sender immediately by e-mail 
if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your

system. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Prairie

Lakes Area Education Agency. Prairie Lakes Area Education Agency accepts no 
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. - 
_
Scott Fosseen - Systems Engineer - Prairie Lakes AEA - 
http://www.aea8.k12.ia.us/tech
_
You can go and find a mailbox right now, open the door to a tin box -
tin door, no lock - with unencrypted information in English, sealed
in a paper-thin envelope with spit, yet people are worried about
online privacy. - Scott McNeely, CEO, Sun Microsystems
_
 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-12 Thread Harry vanderzand
I have not implemented this before.

 

Is there a sample cfg file?

 

What and where can I get the scripts?

 

I would like to get this set up right away and avoid this in the future

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:01 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

 

Hi Harry -

 

HiJack will do what you need to here.  I have two client's who send out mass
emails (about 1000-1500) and HiJack stops it every time (it even stopped me
once!).  I have a script to check the hold directory for messages, and
when I am alerted I simply go in and see whether or not they are legitimate.
If they are, I can use the tool that Declude included to quickly move them
back for processing.  

 

You can then add the person's IP to the available bulk senders.  However,
if their IP address changes (which has been the case for me) then that
doesn't do much good either.  Regardless, once I'm alerted I can usually
login and approve the messages within a short amount of time.  The client
doesn't really know there was a hold up.

 

Everything that has been stopped has been legitimate (knocking on wood) so I
haven't had to test it on a real threat.  But it's good to know that it does
the job it should.

 

Todd

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:26 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

 

I have a situation where a client's computer in their network got infected
by a spammer and 100,000 email got send out over the weekend

 

It sure caused a big mess.

 

How can I prevent this when I am using whitelist auth or do I need to turn
that off?  

 

I have all the latest software from Declude

 

Should I be using Declude Hijack?

 

I do have a few clients that do legitimate mass mailings from time to time.

 

Any help would be very appreciated.

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-12 Thread Harry vanderzand
Yes I have the full suite

 

I will ask declude for guidance in getting it going

 

I am interested in the notify tool and setup instructions

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:55 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

 

Harry -

 

When I upgraded a few years ago to the Declude suite, it came with it and
was running after install.  In fact, it held up a mass mailing by one
client and it took me a little bit to figure out what happened (I didn't
fully understand what it was that I upgraded too!)

 

So the first thing I guess you should do is make sure you actually have
HiJack?

 

Todd

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:24 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

 

I have not implemented this before.

 

Is there a sample cfg file?

 

What and where can I get the scripts?

 

I would like to get this set up right away and avoid this in the future

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:01 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

 

Hi Harry -

 

HiJack will do what you need to here.  I have two client's who send out mass
emails (about 1000-1500) and HiJack stops it every time (it even stopped me
once!).  I have a script to check the hold directory for messages, and
when I am alerted I simply go in and see whether or not they are legitimate.
If they are, I can use the tool that Declude included to quickly move them
back for processing.  

 

You can then add the person's IP to the available bulk senders.  However,
if their IP address changes (which has been the case for me) then that
doesn't do much good either.  Regardless, once I'm alerted I can usually
login and approve the messages within a short amount of time.  The client
doesn't really know there was a hold up.

 

Everything that has been stopped has been legitimate (knocking on wood) so I
haven't had to test it on a real threat.  But it's good to know that it does
the job it should.

 

Todd

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:26 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

 

I have a situation where a client's computer in their network got infected
by a spammer and 100,000 email got send out over the weekend

 

It sure caused a big mess.

 

How can I prevent this when I am using whitelist auth or do I need to turn
that off?  

 

I have all the latest software from Declude

 

Should I be using Declude Hijack?

 

I do have a few clients that do legitimate mass mailings from time to time.

 

Any help would be very appreciated.

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-12 Thread Harry vanderzand
I have found the hijack files and have set it up.

 

Can you maybe send me the script so I can get a notification if mail is
held??

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:55 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

 

Harry -

 

When I upgraded a few years ago to the Declude suite, it came with it and
was running after install.  In fact, it held up a mass mailing by one
client and it took me a little bit to figure out what happened (I didn't
fully understand what it was that I upgraded too!)

 

So the first thing I guess you should do is make sure you actually have
HiJack?

 

Todd

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:24 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

 

I have not implemented this before.

 

Is there a sample cfg file?

 

What and where can I get the scripts?

 

I would like to get this set up right away and avoid this in the future

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:01 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

 

Hi Harry -

 

HiJack will do what you need to here.  I have two client's who send out mass
emails (about 1000-1500) and HiJack stops it every time (it even stopped me
once!).  I have a script to check the hold directory for messages, and
when I am alerted I simply go in and see whether or not they are legitimate.
If they are, I can use the tool that Declude included to quickly move them
back for processing.  

 

You can then add the person's IP to the available bulk senders.  However,
if their IP address changes (which has been the case for me) then that
doesn't do much good either.  Regardless, once I'm alerted I can usually
login and approve the messages within a short amount of time.  The client
doesn't really know there was a hold up.

 

Everything that has been stopped has been legitimate (knocking on wood) so I
haven't had to test it on a real threat.  But it's good to know that it does
the job it should.

 

Todd

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:26 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

 

I have a situation where a client's computer in their network got infected
by a spammer and 100,000 email got send out over the weekend

 

It sure caused a big mess.

 

How can I prevent this when I am using whitelist auth or do I need to turn
that off?  

 

I have all the latest software from Declude

 

Should I be using Declude Hijack?

 

I do have a few clients that do legitimate mass mailings from time to time.

 

Any help would be very appreciated.

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-11 Thread Harry vanderzand
I have a situation where a client's computer in their network got infected
by a spammer and 100,000 email got send out over the weekend

 

It sure caused a big mess.

 

How can I prevent this when I am using whitelist auth or do I need to turn
that off?  

 

I have all the latest software from Declude

 

Should I be using Declude Hijack?

 

I do have a few clients that do legitimate mass mailings from time to time.

 

Any help would be very appreciated.

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations

2008-05-28 Thread Harry vanderzand
Same experience here

Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel
Slentz
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 5:48 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations

I concur with Andrew, Alligate saved our company a ton of money in upgrades
to our mail server.  Our mail server CPU's were peaked 24x7.  When I
inserted Alligate into the mix, CPU's peak at about 30-40% now.  I highly
recommend it.

~Dan



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 1:52 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations


I use Alligate from Solid Oak Software, and I like it a lot.

On my primary gateway, I received just shy of 500,000 connections in the
last 24 hours, and my Declude only had to see 4% of that traffic. Yes, 4%.

I'm spending less time doing clever things in Declude, because Alligate is
pre-filtering so well for me.


Andrew.
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Fosseen
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 1:29 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail Pre-Processor recommendations


I believe I have seen some replies to this already, but I though I would put

this out again.   I am hosting about 30 domains worth of email and
filtering
for an additional 10 domains.  My current configuration is all mail is
pre-filtered through a Barracuda 400 box, then forwarded to a Smartermail
4.x server running Declude with Sniffer, Zero Hour, invURIBL.  The
Smartermail/Declude box is a Dual Quad Core HP server with 2 Gig of RAM.
I
am currently receiving about 600k email messages a day on the Barracuda box,
and it is seeing performance issues.  Before I purchase a 2nd Barracuda box
I though I would check to see if anyone has a better solution.  Declude
still catches 40-60% SPAM after the Barracuda box.

Thanks
_
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or
copy this e-mail. Your are asked to notify the sender immediately by e-mail
if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your
system. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Prairie
Lakes Area Education Agency. Prairie Lakes Area Education Agency accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
-
_
Scott Fosseen - Systems Engineer - Prairie Lakes AEA -
http://www.aea8.k12.ia.us/tech
_
We live in a world today where lemonade is made from artificial flavors and
furniture polish is made from real lemons.  - Alfred E.Neumann MAD magazine
_
 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on mailbox action...

2008-04-30 Thread Harry vanderzand
It would work the same.

You know, just try it

Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck
Schick
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:47 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on mailbox action...


I am not trying to re route the messages.  What I want to do is place the
email in a spam folder for each user if the message exceeds a certain
weight.  The mailbox action in declude would seem to do this.  I just want
to know if the folder will be created automatically using the mailbox action
if it does not already exist.

Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 4:32 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on mailbox action...


It the mail box is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

And you say ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED] THEN THE FOLDER SPAM GETS CREATED
AUTOMATICLY

Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck
Schick
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 5:36 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on mailbox action...


If I institute a mailbox action like 

WEIGHT10 MAILBOX spam

Will Imail automatically create the folder spam for the user if it does
not already exist?

Thanks

Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on mailbox action...

2008-04-29 Thread Harry vanderzand
It the mail box is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

And you say ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED] THEN THE FOLDER SPAM GETS CREATED
AUTOMATICLY

Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck
Schick
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 5:36 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Question on mailbox action...


If I institute a mailbox action like 

WEIGHT10 MAILBOX spam

Will Imail automatically create the folder spam for the user if it does
not already exist?

Thanks

Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: alligate

2008-04-22 Thread Harry vanderzand
Your MX record should be changed to the new Alligate IP address.

 

Alligate will send mail to imail server

 

No change needed in Imail as far as I recall

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 2:58 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: alligate

 

Hi All,

I have installed alligate on a new dedicated server and configured
everything by the looks of it.

Does anyone know what DNS settings I need to make on my domain and what I
need to change on my IMAIL server?

I sent a support ticket to alligate about 10 seconds ago but am itching to
get it working and wondered if anyone here knew.

 

Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.net 

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc crashes

2008-04-11 Thread Harry vanderzand
I have two items that are crashing decludeproc.

 

I have tried to forward them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I cannot get it through
because it crashes decludeproc when it is an attachment also.

 

So I tried to cut and paste it in an email, that crashes too.

 

How can I get this to Declude?

 

It definitely crashes the program so I think it is important for them to see
it.

 

Thanks

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc crashes

2008-04-11 Thread Harry vanderzand
Sorry I am not thinking very well today.

 

Zipping them up worked

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 11:31 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] decludeproc crashes

 

I have two items that are crashing decludeproc.

 

I have tried to forward them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I cannot get it through
because it crashes decludeproc when it is an attachment also.

 

So I tried to cut and paste it in an email, that crashes too.

 

How can I get this to Declude?

 

It definitely crashes the program so I think it is important for them to see
it.

 

Thanks

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 4.4.0 leaving some trash?

2008-04-04 Thread Harry vanderzand
I do not see that

Harry Vanderzand
NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 7:20 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 4.4.0 leaving some trash?


I just checked and I am seeing this as well.

Darrell

--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.


Adolfo Justiniano wrote:
 Is someone else noticing that version 4.4.0 is leaving a lot of txt files
in
 the proc/work directory? Version 4.3.46 didn't do this, I've noticed since
 we upgraded.
 
 
 Adolfo Justiniano
 Santa Cruz BBS
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.scbbs.net 
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by the Santa Cruz BBS anti-virus
system]
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

-- 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] My server has been totally revived!!!

2008-04-02 Thread Harry vanderzand
Download dlanalyzer from www.invariantsystems.com to verify your volume

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:03 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] My server has been totally revived!!!

 

Oka.

 

I am off to get the trial right now!

 

Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
www.123marbella.net

 

LEGAL DISCLAIMER - This message may contain confidential, proprietary or
legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the
addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message
you are hereby informed that you must not use, disseminate, copy it in any
form or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message
in error please delete it and any copies of it and notify it to the sender. 

 

AVISO LEGAL - Este mensaje puede contener informacion confidencial, en
propiedad o legalmente protegida y esta dirigida unicamente para el uso de
la persona destinataria. Si usted no es la persona destinataria de este
mensaje, por la presente se le comunica que no debe usar, difundir, copiar
de ninguna forma, ni emprender ninguna accion en relacion con ella.

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: 01 April 2008 23:35
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] My server has been totally revived!!!

 

I just want to share the effect of adding a gateway to my setup.

 

I installed Alligate on the same server that is handling my
imail/declude/sniffer/invuribl.

 

My server was getting to be quite overloaded especially during peak time.  I
thought I was only processing about 40,000 mails a day.  I was going by the
imail daily report.  Of course that was wrong.  It does not include all the
spam that never makes it to imail.  I found that our when I installed
DLAnalyzer from invariant Systems.  To my amazement I was processing 500,000
mails a day.  No wonder there was the odd crash of decludeproc or imail smtp

 

After investigating solutions and a discussion with Darrell from Invariant,
I decided to get Alligate.  That was last week.  I have it running smoothly
with about 200 domains and my server has room to spare.  Whereas the
hardware was averaging around 90% utilization is it now at half that.
Declude\imail is now reporting only 67,000 mails a day.  Imail itself sees
only 20,000.  What a change.

 

I sure hated to spend another 800 on spam but sure am glad I did.  My
hardware can last much longer.

 

Times sure change  98% spam is huge when you get 500,000 mails a day

 

Much thanks to Darrell for his assistance.

 

I will gladly share more if anyone is curious

 

Harry Vanderzand


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] My server has been totally revived!!!

2008-04-01 Thread Harry vanderzand
I just want to share the effect of adding a gateway to my setup.

 

I installed Alligate on the same server that is handling my
imail/declude/sniffer/invuribl.

 

My server was getting to be quite overloaded especially during peak time.  I
thought I was only processing about 40,000 mails a day.  I was going by the
imail daily report.  Of course that was wrong.  It does not include all the
spam that never makes it to imail.  I found that our when I installed
DLAnalyzer from invariant Systems.  To my amazement I was processing 500,000
mails a day.  No wonder there was the odd crash of decludeproc or imail smtp

 

After investigating solutions and a discussion with Darrell from Invariant,
I decided to get Alligate.  That was last week.  I have it running smoothly
with about 200 domains and my server has room to spare.  Whereas the
hardware was averaging around 90% utilization is it now at half that.
Declude\imail is now reporting only 67,000 mails a day.  Imail itself sees
only 20,000.  What a change.

 

I sure hated to spend another 800 on spam but sure am glad I did.  My
hardware can last much longer.

 

Times sure change  98% spam is huge when you get 500,000 mails a day

 

Much thanks to Darrell for his assistance.

 

I will gladly share more if anyone is curious

 

Harry Vanderzand



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-02-05 Thread Harry vanderzand
Cute.

 

Insulting people gets things done and makes you look very important.

 

Right!

 

Harry Vanderzand

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
Klinge
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 2:08 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have
permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

 

Will you morons please remove me from your spam list?

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:33 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have
permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

 

Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is
[384-0F3A4F35-96D8].

Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the
subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.

The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you
have had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support
number 1-866-332-5833

Thank You.

Declude Technical Support



view
http://support.declude.com/customer/viewticket.aspx?email=declude.junkmail%
40declude.comticketnum=384-0F3A4F35-96D8  this ticket online 
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?

2008-02-01 Thread Harry vanderzand
no

 

Harry Vanderzand

NEW ADDRESS Effective Jan 24, 2008

Intown Internet

117 Ruskview Road

Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
SJ.Stanaitis
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 8:33 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Where'd Dell go?

 

I can't seem to get to www.dell.com from my network here or 2 other
non-related external networks either...anyone else having a problem getting
there?

 

Cheers,

--SJ

 

SJ.Stanaitis - Network Administrator

Decorative Product Source, Inc


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Software for copying files with permissions

2007-06-26 Thread Harry vanderzand
If you want to move an entire image to a new machine then I would use
Acronis software to image the old server

 

You do need to make sure that the drivers for your boot drive are the same
for both machines.

 

If you find that the new machine needs a different driver then you could
take a SCSI controller and hard drive and image the old machine to the SCSI
drive (after you activate the SCSI drive and driver on the machine)  You
then move the scsi card and drive to the new machine where it can boot since
you installed the scsi driver on the old machine before you imaged it.  Once
booted with the scsi drive you can now load all the new drivewr5s needed
including the driver for the new hard drive sub system.  Once that is done
you can move the image from the scsi drive to the hard drive in the new
computer.

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

11 Belmont Ave. W.

Kitchener, ON, N2M 1L2

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sharyn
Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:49 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Software for copying files with permissions

 

Morning, 

Does anyone have a recommendation for some software that is going to copy
files on one of my fileservers to a new server, along with all the
permissions and security that is currently in place?

Thanks, 
Sharyn 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] X-Note: REVDNS: (timeout)

2007-04-30 Thread Harry vanderzand
I am seeing this in spam getting through.

 

What would be causing this?

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

11 Belmont Ave. W.

Kitchener, ON, N2M 1L2

519-741-1222

 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Warning re: DECLUDE - CRITICAL VIRUS SCANNING UPDATE

2007-04-16 Thread Harry vanderzand
It works fine for us also

 

Harry Vanderzand

Intown Internet

11 Belmont Ave. W.

Kitchener, ON, N2M 1L2

519-741-1222

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Richards
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 7:34 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Warning re: DECLUDE - CRITICAL VIRUS
SCANNING UPDATE

 

Hi Dave -

 

I actually just installed it (didn't see your message in time) and mine
appears to be working.

 

Todd

 

 

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Doherty
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:12 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Warning re: DECLUDE - CRITICAL VIRUS SCANNING
UPDATE

I attempted to install this update on my server. The package is apparently
missing a DLL. The decludeproc service would not start, and the pop-up said
to contact support. The update email was issued at 5:15 PM, and Declude was
closed. I left a message.

 

I got back up and running by reinstalling the previous update and rebooting.

 

I strongly suggest that you DO NOT install this update until Declude can
figure out what's wrong with it!


-Dave Doherty
 Skywaves, Inc.
 97 Webster Street
 Worcester, MA 01603
 508-425-7176

 

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] issue with spam to alias account

2007-01-14 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I did further testing and found that I was not correct.  Spam was being
directed towards a sub mailbox that did not have a filter specified
 
All is well
 
Thanks

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
Vanderzand
Sent: Saturday, January 13, 2007 9:32 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] issue with spam to alias account


In sorting through my logs I just noticed that e-mail going to an alias was
considered spam with last action = DELETE.
 
Yet the spam got delivered to the three accounts that are listed in the
alias.
 
Is there a problem with spam handling when it is directed at an alias?
 
Using imail 2006.1 and latest declude
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] issue with spam to alias account

2007-01-13 Thread Harry Vanderzand
In sorting through my logs I just noticed that e-mail going to an alias
was considered spam with last action = DELETE.
 
Yet the spam got delivered to the three accounts that are listed in the
alias.
 
Is there a problem with spam handling when it is directed at an alias?
 
Using imail 2006.1 and latest declude
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] mailbox command

2007-01-08 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I have tried to route mail using the mailbox command instead of
routeto
 
I really like the feature as each user can check their own held spam.
 
And by using mailbox spam it goes into a spam folder belonging to the
user.  Then I can keep these accounts trimmed by removing mail older
than x days (thanks for the recent assistance in this command)
 
There is one big problem however.  If the account has forwarding set
then the spam gets forwarded.
 
I have clients that keep mail in their own account and also forward it
to another account in their company.  In this case the spam gets
forwarded.
 
Other clients have a copy of their mail forwarded to their blackberry
also.
 
Can anyone see an easy solution to this?  I could setup a junkmail file
for each user but that would be a huge undertaking
 
Thank you
 
 
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] script to remove messages from mailbox

2007-01-04 Thread Harry Vanderzand
A while back someone published a script that would remove messages older
than x days from a mail box file along with his set up of how he handles
spam for his client in individual spam mailboxes.
 
I cannot find it again and was wondering if someone could point me in
the right direction.
 
Thank you so much
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] roconner -can he be stopped???

2007-01-04 Thread Harry Vanderzand
 
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus sneaking past Declude/AVG/F-PROT?

2006-12-22 Thread Harry Vanderzand
do you have avafterjm on?
 
In that case if it is deemed as spam then virus scan will not run on it.
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
S.J.Stanaitis
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 3:55 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Virus sneaking past Declude/AVG/F-PROT?



I've got a single mailbox on my Imail server configured to get all the SPAM.
It's then processed in TheBat!  (Exciting, I know.  Take a moment and
revel.)

 

Anyhow, my Symantec Antivirus is snagging a slew of Trojan.Dowiex!inf which
it identifies as a low risk Trojan horse.  I've got Declude 4 running both
AVG and F-Prot and it snuck past.  Anyone else seeing this?

 

http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2006-121817-5005
-99

 

Thanks,

Sam

 

SJ.Stanaitis - Network Administrator

Decorative Product Source E-commerce Network


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] problem after imail upgrade

2006-12-21 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I am getting the following error after having upgraded to imail 2006.1
 
421 #4.4.5 Too many connections from your host
 
It is all from one domain, sympatico.ca, one of the largest providers in
Canada
 
It is for mail being delivered to my clients' mail box but then
forwarded to a sypatico.ca address.
 
What might cause this with 2006.1 when it did not occur in 8.22?
 
All else seems to be working fine.
 
Thank you
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006.1 and declude

2006-12-19 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I just upgraded from imail V8.22 to 2006.1
 
After the upgrade the load on my system is much heavier
 
The system was running smoothly before the upgrade but now it is hitting
100% utilization consistently
 
I am concerned because it is before 6am.  What will happen during the
day when my users are active?
 
I am running on dual xeon 3.4Ghz with 2GB ram, windows 2000 server.
Everything is at latest version and update level
 
I am running sniffer, invuribl and fprot also
 
sniffer is in persistent mode
 
Any help or ideas would be appreciated
 
declude.cfg:
CODE   xx
threads   150
waitformail   500
waitforthreads   25
waitbetweenthreads  100
winsockcleanup  OFF
avgupdatefreqhrs 4
BANCHARSET  iso-2022-jp
BANCHARSET  koi8-r
AUTOREVIEW ON
BLKLST   ON
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006.1 and declude

2006-12-19 Thread Harry Vanderzand
My message volume is about 40K per day
 
I have resolved the issue.  I noticed the persistent sniffer not being very
persistent and realized that my code was changed yesterday.  I had updated
the automatic update routines and the global.cfg file but had forgotten to
update the code in the registry for the persistent sniffer service.  What a
relief
 
I am looking to see if I can tune the box better since I am in the mode now.
I increased my threads in imail from 30 to 40 without seeing much of a hit.
Right now I am seeing and average of around 40% utilization I would guess.
Are there tools to measure this more accurately other than looking at task
manager?  Of course there are tools, I guess I mean to ask what you might
use to measure performance and tune the server.

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:44 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006.1 and declude


threads   150
 
This is very high - even on a dual proc xeon (2.6) box - HT enabled - I am
easily able to run with 40 threads processing 150K messages a day.  What is
your message volume?

Darrell
 

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.

- Original Message - 
From: Harry  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Vanderzand 
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com 
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:54 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006.1 and declude

I just upgraded from imail V8.22 to 2006.1
 
After the upgrade the load on my system is much heavier
 
The system was running smoothly before the upgrade but now it is hitting
100% utilization consistently
 
I am concerned because it is before 6am.  What will happen during the day
when my users are active?
 
I am running on dual xeon 3.4Ghz with 2GB ram, windows 2000 server.
Everything is at latest version and update level
 
I am running sniffer, invuribl and fprot also
 
sniffer is in persistent mode
 
Any help or ideas would be appreciated
 
declude.cfg:
CODE   xx
threads   150
waitformail   500
waitforthreads   25
waitbetweenthreads  100
winsockcleanup  OFF
avgupdatefreqhrs 4
BANCHARSET  iso-2022-jp
BANCHARSET  koi8-r
AUTOREVIEW ON
BLKLST   ON
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] \spool\charset directory

2006-12-12 Thread Harry Vanderzand
The spool\charset directory is filling up with thousands of e-mails per day.
 
Can that be stopped? while still keeping the bancharset command?

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] \spool\charset directory

2006-12-12 Thread Harry Vanderzand
this is a test in declude.cfg and there is nowhere where I am setting up
that directory.  I guess it is by defaults.  I just do not want to see 100s
of thousands emails in a directory nor do I feel like personally managing
it.
 
I am not the greatest with scripts either.  These kinds of controls I would
like to see in Declude itself.
 
In a gui interface by the way!
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck,
Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 6:45 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] \spool\charset directory


Harry, check your global.cfg and see if you have a test with a COPYTO action
that copies the email to that spool\charset folder when the test is
triggered.
 
Then comment out that test and action.
 
Andrew.


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry
Vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2:39 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] \spool\charset directory


The spool\charset directory is filling up with thousands of e-mails per day.
 
Can that be stopped? while still keeping the bancharset command?

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: SmarterMail's website

2006-12-04 Thread Harry Vanderzand
me neither
 

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 


  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Asaro
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:54 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: SmarterMail's website



I cannot navigate to that address either..

 

 

Chris 

 

 

 

 

 


  _  


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Graveen
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:40 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: SmarterMail's website

 

Is anyone else having trouble getting to SmarterMail's web site
(www.smartertools.com http://www.smartertools.com/ )?  I have been unable
to access it since Sunday morning.

Mike



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Max whitelists hit

2006-10-16 Thread Harry Vanderzand
When using the WHITELISTFILE option, does anyone have a way where a user can
maintain their own whitlist file possibly through the imail web interface?

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of David Barker
 Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:40 AM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Max whitelists hit
 Sensitivity: Confidential
 
 Yes, in the global.cfg there is a limit. If you need to have 
 unlimited whitelist entries, or if you need per-user or 
 per-domain whitelisting, you may find the WHITELISTFILE 
 option helpful. 
 
 To use this option, you need to add a line in the format 
 WHITELISTFILE D:\{MAILSERVER}\Declude\mywhitelist.txt to 
 the appropriate configuration file 
 (\{MAILSERVER}\Declude\$default$.JunkMail, or the 
 per-user/per-domain configuration file you wish to use the 
 whitelists with). The D:\{MAILSERVER}\Declude\mywhitelist.txt 
 file would then contain either one E-mail address 
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) or domain (@example.com) or subdomain
 (.example.com) per line. The whitelist files can have 
 unlimited entries in them. 
 
 Note that the file you use with the WHITELISTFILE option does 
 NOT use the same format as the WHITELIST entries in the 
 global.cfg file. Also, note that the WHITELISTFILE option 
 does not work in the global.cfg file. 
 
 David B
 www.declude.com
 
 
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Craig Edmonds
 Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:34 AM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Max whitelists hit
 Importance: High
 Sensitivity: Confidential
 
 
 just found this in my declude log.
  
 07/27/2006 15:28:25.221 qbf78048c0118c40b.smd WARNING: Max 
 whitelists hit.
 Some whitelists will not be processed!
  
 Is there a limit to the amount of domains you can put in the 
 whitelist?
  
 
 Kindest Regards
 Craig Edmonds
 123 Marbella Internet
 W: www.123marbella.com http://www.123marbella.com/ E : 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   http://i.msgtag.com/alaqebaugecbtfqn/xlkcihtsdEb/aom/yi.gif
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



[Declude.JunkMail] Crisis after upgrade to 4.3.14 from 4.3.7

2006-09-29 Thread Harry Vanderzand



Last night at 8:11PM 
I upgraded from 4.3.7 to 4.3.14

From that point on 
we stopped catching all spam for these clients that have their own mail 
server. We just filter their mail for spam and pass it 
on.

I just reverted back 
to 4.3.7 and now we are catching spam again for them

We catch over 4000 
spam messages per dayfor one of these clients alone so you can imagine 
their complaint this morning.

Anyone know what 
would have caused this?

Thank 
you

Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222


---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Crisis after upgrade to 4.3.14 from 4.3.7

2006-09-29 Thread Harry Vanderzand



I am going to do the upgrade again this time putting the 
following commands in the cfg file:

OUTBOUNDSCANNINGSPAMONINBOUNDSCANNINGSPAMON

Obviously this should not 
have happened and it was unfortunate. I believe Declude is getting a 
message ready for everyone.

I will let you know the 
results shortly to confirm that that was it

Thanks for your 
responses

Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 519-741-1222


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of chrisSent: Friday, 
  September 29, 2006 10:08 AMTo: 
  declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Crisis 
  after upgrade to 4.3.14 from 4.3.7
  
  
  Nick, I will 
  definitely post these results, but I have yet to hear from harry, I believe 
  the response from the first user is the 
  solution!!!
  
  
  
  Chris 
  Asaro
  Technical Support 
  Engineer
  Declude
  Your Email 
  security is our 
  business
  866.332.5833toll 
  free978.499.2933office978.477.8930 e-fax[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.declude.com
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick HayerSent: Friday, September 29, 2006 9:55 
  AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Crisis 
  after upgrade to 4.3.14 from 4.3.7
  
  Harry,Please post to the list the details - 
  Thanks-Nickchris wrote: 
  Harry 
  
  
  
  Contact me off the 
  list if you can, I would like to 
help
  
  
  
  Chris 
  Asaro
  Technical Support 
  Engineer
  Declude
  Your Email 
  security is our 
  business
  866.332.5833toll 
  free978.499.2933office978.477.8930 e-fax[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.declude.com
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Harry VanderzandSent: Friday, September 29, 2006 9:15 
  AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Crisis after 
  upgrade to 4.3.14 from 4.3.7
  
  
  Last night at 8:11PM I upgraded 
  from 4.3.7 to 4.3.14
  
  
  
  From that point on we stopped 
  catching all spam for these clients that have their own mail server. We 
  just filter their mail for spam and pass it 
  on.
  
  
  
  I just reverted back to 4.3.7 and 
  now we are catching spam again for 
  them
  
  
  
  We catch over 4000 spam messages 
  per dayfor one of these clients alone so you can imagine their complaint 
  this morning.
  
  
  
  Anyone know what would have caused 
  this?
  
  
  
  Thank 
  you
  
  
  Harry Vanderzand 
  inTown Internet  Computer 
  Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, 
  ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222
  
  
  ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail 
  mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
  "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 
  ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. 
  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
  "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 
  ---This E-mail came from the 
  Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives 
  can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. ---This E-mail came 
  from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail 
  to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The 
  archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ASSP

2006-09-19 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I am interested in this also.  Maybe it can be on list?

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Don Brown
 Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 3:03 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ASSP
 
 There were a couple of recent posts from folks who had 
 recently implemented ASSP. We have to do the same due to the 
 vulnerability in Imail 8.22.
 
 I'd appreciate any comments, suggestions, etc.  OFF LIST, 
 from those who have already fell in the holes, etc.
 
 Thanks,
 
 
 
 Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
 (972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-20 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Title: Message



This has been a great thread to follow and I just want 
to add my two cents worth.

At the moment the whole issue of spam filtering is 
quite complex. Declude's configuration requires constant tweaking it 
seams. That translates into labour.

If Declude can somehow manage to reduce the amount of 
labour and skill involved that would be of great value

It would not necessarily earn us more money, but it can 
earn us more time.

Personally I would like to have Declude running and 
then just forget about it.

Well maybe I would continue reading this list because 
it can be entertaining and educational.

Regarding revenue sharing. I do charge for anti-spam 
and anti-virus services. I don't compete with the mayor service providers 
that offer it for free. As with others on this list I offer personalized 
quality service to my clients. I attract clients that understand and 
desire that. I have never advertised. It does work. 


WhileI recognize that there is value to 
anything that frees up my time, I do have to keep an eye on net income 
also I spend money on tools and consume my time. Any revenue 
sharing program with a third party will be compared against what I do now. 
If it's clear and fits in comparison to what I do now,then it will be 
attractive to me. If it also saves time that will make some 
difference


Harry 
Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer 
Services 519-741-1222

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3

2006-07-19 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Thanks David

Is the global variable correction important enough to upgrade from 4.2.20?

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of David Barker
 Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 9:24 AM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
 
 Gary,
 
 4.3 Release notes: Added CT and a Global variable being 
 initialized more than once has been corrected.
 
 You are correct in your statement, if you do not want to join 
 our Service Provide Program you can choose not too participate.
 
 David B
 www.declude.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of Gary Steiner
 Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 7:21 PM
 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
 
 Basically you are telling me to ignore the Add Commtouch part 
 of your web page that shows up when I log in to my account.  
 
 What I find particularly amusing is the line Restrictions 
 apply to service providers.  If there is anyone subscribed 
 to this mailing list who is not a service provider, please 
 raise your hand.
 
 Isn't it generally a good idea to have your product's pricing 
 defined before you introduce the product?  I'm sure that 
 everyone here reading the list is extremely curious as to 
 what the revenue share program really is, and when it does 
 come out, unless you hear exclamations of What a Bargain 
 coming off this list there won't be many of us joining that program.
 
 Other than the Commtouch add-on, are there any other features 
 or reasons to upgrade to 4.3?
 
 
 
  Original Message 
  From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:03 PM
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
  
  Gary,
  
  1. Server Providers who use CommTouch as an add-in to 
 Declude will be 
  in violation of CommTouch's Terms of service.
  
  2. Some of the benefits of CommTouch are Zero Hour virus protection 
  and additional spam identifying technology such as 
 Recurrent Pattern 
  Detection Technology (RPD) recognized by key industry analysts as a 
  leading technology in email outbreak detection.
  
  3. We are in the process of defining the revenue share program and 
  will provide the details to this when it is ready.
  
  David B
  www.declude.com
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  Gary Steiner
  Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:09 PM
  To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
  
  So, that being said, under what conditions can a legacy 
 customer use 
  Commtouch?
  
  Since it would seem that Commtouch is being offered as an 
 add-on, what 
  are the benefits of having Commtouch?  What does it do that Declude 
  alone does not?
  
  And of course it would be nice if this revenue share program was 
  spelled out somewhere.
  
  
  
   Original Message 
   From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:57 PM
   To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
   Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
   
   There are restrictions on CommTouch being used by Service 
 Providers 
   we had to ensure that NEW customers (ie. Service 
 Providers After 1 
   June
   06) understand the licensing restrictions.
   
   Current Service Providers (ie. Before 1 June 06) are under no 
   restrictions for using Declude; only the CommTouch add-in 
 component.
   
   However we have managed to come to an agreement with CommTouch to 
   enable our legacy customers (ie. Service Providers Before 
 1 June 06) 
   to take advantage of CommTouch under a revenue share 
 program, this 
   program is not being forced onto legacy customers but will be an 
   opportunity for us to help you increase revenues in your 
 business, 
   by providing you with new product like the Declude Gateway which 
   would be independent of Imail/SmarterMail and will 
 include CommTouch.
   
   David B
   www.declude.com
   
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
 Behalf Of 
   John T
   (Lists)
   Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 3:02 PM
   To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
   Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 4.3
   
   I guess we all missed the following paragraph in the 
 license agreement:
   
   3.2.6 sub-license, rent, sell, lease, distribute, or otherwise 
   transfer the Licensed Program save as provided under this 
 End-User 
   License Agreement unless You obtain a separate License 
 from Declude, 
   Inc. for such purposes (for example, You may not embed 
 the Licensed 
   Program into another application and then distribute such 
 to third 
   parties unless You first acquire an OEM License from 
 Declude, Inc.).
   As of June 1, 2006, ISP's and other service providers

[Declude.JunkMail] malformed message-id

2006-06-15 Thread Harry Vanderzand




I am having a problem where the message-id is malformed which 
trips upsome clients.

see:
Message-Id: 
200606131300275.SM04448@X-Declude-Sender: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [216.16.233.16]
Notice the the closing bracket is on a separate line. 
Thiscauses theheaders to 
become part of the body for some of my clients.
Has anyone seen this 
before? Is it an imail issue or a declude issue?
Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222


---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] malformed message-id

2006-06-15 Thread Harry Vanderzand



Thanks Matt

This message comes straight from a form submission on one 
of my servers. I think aspmail is being used. My programmer says 
that it can't be caused by that and is blaming the SMTP server it is submitted 
to, which is my imail server

Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 519-741-1222


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: 
  Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:27 PMTo: 
  declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 
  malformed message-id
  Looks like an IMail inserted Message-Id header, so in part it is 
  their problem. I suspect that the trigger though is the sender having an 
  invalid HELO, which IMail is then mishandling. It could have also been a 
  hickup unless it is repeatable with the same source.The HELO, MAIL 
  FROM and RCPT TO should all have only US-ASCII printable characters (excluding 
  space). Anything beyond that is invalid on it's own, and IMO, the MTA 
  should issue a 5xx error when received indicating as 
  much.MattHarry Vanderzand wrote: 
  


I am having a problem where the message-id is malformed 
which trips upsome clients.

see:
Message-Id: 
200606131300275.SM04448@X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[216.16.233.16]
Notice the the closing bracket is on a separate line. 
Thiscauses theheaders to 
become part of the body for some of my clients.
Has anyone seen this 
before? Is it an imail issue or a declude issue?
Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail 
mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 
  ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing 
  list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] malformed message-id

2006-06-15 Thread Harry Vanderzand



following is an excerpt of my imail log: This message 
is submitted directly to the imail server. None of my other servers run 
any SMTP server software.

06:13 13:00 SMTPD(ef2801f16207) [216.16.233.16] 
HELO06:13 13:00 SMTPD(ef2801f16207) [216.16.233.16] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]06:13 
13:00 SMTPD(ef2801f16207) [216.16.233.16] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]06:13 13:00 
SMTPD(ef2801f16207) [216.16.233.16] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]06:13 
13:00 SMTPD(ef2801f16207) [216.16.233.16] 
D:\IMail\spool\Def2801f16207.SMD 16252

Thanks 
for your assistance
Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 519-741-1222


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: 
  Thursday, June 15, 2006 4:37 PMTo: 
  declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 
  malformed message-id
  Any connecting SMTP connection must submit a HELO or EHLO. I 
  believe that IMail uses the HELO/EHLO name given as the part of the Message-ID 
  after the @ symbol, but will only insert this if there is no Message-ID 
  already present (which would also fail SPAMHEADERS in Declude unless 
  LOOSENSPAMHEADERS ON is set). If there is an line break here, that data 
  must be bad. If you look in your IMail log for the information about the 
  session (and turn up the logging), you should be able to see the HELO/EHLO 
  name given.FYI, this wouldn't be the first IIS plug-in that had RFC 
  issues. Many have them. I can't say for sure 100% though that this 
  is the case here due to circumstances, but I strongly suspect this is the 
  trigger. If IMail acted properly, the message would have been rejected, 
  and that's not a solution to your issues either, so the fix is likely best 
  applied to your mailer.MattHarry Vanderzand wrote: 
  

Thanks Matt

This message comes straight from a form submission on 
one of my servers. I think aspmail is being used. My programmer 
says that it can't be caused by that and is blaming the SMTP server it is 
submitted to, which is my imail server

Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 519-741-1222


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On 
  Behalf Of MattSent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:27 
  PMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: 
  Re: [Declude.JunkMail] malformed message-idLooks like 
  an IMail inserted Message-Id header, so in part it is their problem. 
  I suspect that the trigger though is the sender having an invalid HELO, 
  which IMail is then mishandling. It could have also been a hickup 
  unless it is repeatable with the same source.The HELO, MAIL FROM 
  and RCPT TO should all have only US-ASCII printable characters (excluding 
  space). Anything beyond that is invalid on it's own, and IMO, the 
  MTA should issue a 5xx error when received indicating as 
  much.MattHarry Vanderzand wrote: 
  

I am having a problem where the message-id is 
malformed which trips upsome clients.

see:
Message-Id: 
200606131300275.SM04448@X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[216.16.233.16]
Notice the the closing bracket is on a separate line. 
Thiscauses theheaders 
to become part of the body for some of my clients.
Has anyone seen this 
before? Is it an imail issue or a declude issue?
Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., 
Kitchener, ON,N2M 
1L2519-741-1222
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail 
mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 
  ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing 
  list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
  "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.---This 
E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, just 
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com. 
  ---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing 
  list. Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
  andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be foundat 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Monitoring/Auditing a Windows Server

2006-05-31 Thread Harry Vanderzand



good perspective

Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 519-741-1222


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert E. 
  SpivackSent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 7:01 PMTo: 
  Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: 
  Monitoring/Auditing a Windows Server
  
  
  Lets start at 
  the high-level:
  
  What question 
  are you trying to answer?
  
  e.g:
  
   Are the 
  developers spending enough time doing the work they should be 
  doing?
  
  Are the 
  developers doing things they should not be 
doing?
  
  Are the 
  developers competent and performing their job 
  properly?
  
  Are the 
  developers hours spent working matching their timesheets/project 
  sheets?
  
  Etc.
  
  
  There are 
  different solutions depending upon your 
  objectives.
  
  
  Note: 
  Personally, for outsourcing I pay based on a project or deliverable so 
  tracking time/usage is of no interest to me. I pay for a certain result 
  and dont care if it takes an hour or a week to do it. Also, I audit the 
  quality of the finished product/code/service, I dont care about the 
  tools/methods used to reach that goal.
  
  In your 
  case:
  
  Since you have 
  a virtual server environment, you can also audit at the host level. E.g. 
  you can run SNMP tools and measure traffic (bps and total bytes in/out) on the 
  virtual network ports of the virtual machine to see the activity level. You 
  can see the protocol (http, http, netbios, smb, etc.) to see what type of 
  activity is flowing through the machine. If you run the tool in a 
  virtual machine on the same physical host, it can use packet capture to fully 
  analyze the traffic and not just SNMP/WMI. 
  
  You might 
  consider re-writing your outsourcing contract. You really shouldnt have 
  to police the project/micromanage it. Afterall, management of 
  outsourcing is the hidden cost that can eat you alive and remove any cost 
  benefits so why allow yourself to fall into that black 
  hole?
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Goran 
  JovanovicSent: Wednesday, 
  May 31, 2006 1:09 PMTo: 
  Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: 
  Monitoring/Auditing a Windows Server
  
  It is a dev/staging 
  server running in a virtual server environment so I have to be a bit careful 
  what I turn on or dont.
  
  I tried the auditing 
  a file. Wow talk about generating Security Event Log records. I turned 
  auditing on for two files bginfo.exe and its corresponding config.bgi file. 
  Then I ran it to generate the background on file server. That simple little 
  thing created 15 log entries.
  
  If we turn this on we 
  are going to need something to parse the security log file as I can see that 
  it is going to produce a HUGE amount traffic in 
  there.
  
  
  Goran 
  Jovanovic
  Omega Network 
  Solutions
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Shaun 
  MickeySent: Wednesday, May 
  31, 2006 3:34 PMTo: 
  Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: 
  Monitoring/Auditing a Windows Server
  
  You could also enable auditing in 
  Windows to examine file level access, just r-click on any file/folder and 
  select properties, click on the security tab then click advanced then click on 
  the auditing tab. 
  
  WARNING: auditing a lot of 
  high-use files could strain the server
  
  That being said, your on a dev 
  server so it should be alright, though I would keep the number of files youre 
  auditing to a minimum or as small a group as 
  possible
  
  
  Thanks,
  
  Shaun
  ---Shaun 
  Mickey270net TechnologiesPhone: 
  301.663.6000 x28Fax: 301.663.4410www.270net.com
  "Internet/Technology 
  Solutions for Business and 
  Government"---
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Darin 
  CoxSent: Wednesday, May 31, 
  2006 3:16 PMTo: 
  Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: 
  Monitoring/Auditing a Windows Server
  
  
  Source code 
  activity would be best analyzed with Visual SourceSafe or another code control 
  system. For watching use of the sites for testing, etc. just enable 
  logging for the virtual webs and run reports on the web 
  traffic.
  
  Darin.
  
  
  
  
  
  - Original 
  Message - 
  
  From: Goran Jovanovic 
  
  
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  
  Sent: Wednesday, May 
  31, 2006 2:35 PM
  
  Subject: 
  [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Monitoring/Auditing a Windows 
  Server
  
  
  Hi 
  All,
  
  This is definitely an 
  off topic question. 
  
  I have a client that 
  wants to monitor what their outsourced developers are doing. The development 
  is taking place in IIS, .Net Application Server and SQL 2000. They want 

[Declude.JunkMail] Spam from spoofed addresses that are whitelisted

2006-05-15 Thread Harry Vanderzand




I currently have my 
client's source IP's and their domains whitlisted. I am realizing that 
spam is getting through. If I interpret the headers correctly the mail 
below is coming from 85.71.84.125, which is somewhere in the world. It was 
scanned by my server before being delivered to my clients mail server as I take 
care of the spam scanning. Since I have @myclientsdomain.com whitelisted 
it got through to them. The target domain was invalid, however their 
server processed the BCC's that were in that mail and delivered mail to those 
addresses one of those was [EMAIL PROTECTED].
I want to tighten that 
up but am afraid to upset the apple cart here and trap mail that I should 
not. I know in the past I was trapping mail from legitimate source at my 
client as some of their software formed mail that made it look like spam to my 
configuration
Any guidance and help 
would be appreciated.
I run imail 8.22 with 
declude 4.2.3, sniffer and invuribl
Thank 
you



Received: from ntserver.heartlandapp.com 
[72.1.199.42] by intown.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD-8.22) id AE0003A0; Sun, 14 May 2006 14:59:12 
-0400
Received: from intown.net ([216.16.233.12]) by 
ntserver.heartlandapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Sun, 14 May 2006 14:59:13 -0400
Received: from 792352B8 [85.71.84.125] by 
intown.net
(SMTPD-8.22) id ADF103A0; Sun, 14 May 2006 14:58:57 
-0400
Received: from 216.16.233.12 (localhost 
[127.0.0.1])
by 216.16.233.12
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 
8 2003))
with ESMTP id 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for 
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Sun, 14 May 2006 12:02:33 -0800
Received: from [154.212.180.108] (Forwarded-For: 
[242.208.166.108])
by 216.16.233.12 (mshttpd); Sun, 14 May 2006 12:02:33 
-0800
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:02:33 -0800
From: "Ladonna Parr" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: we offer degrees in less than 2 
weeks
Message-id: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 
(built Sep 8 2003)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-language: en
Content-transfer-encoding: 7Bit
Content-disposition: inline
Priority: normal
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[85.71.84.125]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D7dec00379dd0.smd
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted [0]
Return-Path: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2006 18:59:13.0629 
(UTC) FILETIME=[7DCA10D0:01C67788]
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[72.1.199.42]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D7e0001e29de4.smd
X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is 
0.
X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: Whitelisted
X-Note: REMOTEIP: 72.1.199.42
X-Note: REVDNS: 
dsl-72-1-199.042.tel-ott.com
X-Note: FROM: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: TO:otherclient.com
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted [0]
X-RCPT-TO: john@otherclient.com
Status: U
X-UIDL: 428962690
X-IMail-ThreadID: 7e0001e29de4

Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Testing the Boards

2006-04-27 Thread Harry Vanderzand
PING

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
 Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 9:22 AM
 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Testing the Boards
 
 PING
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1

2006-04-06 Thread Harry Vanderzand



I have always done 
the updates by stopping the decludeproc service, putting the new decludeproc 
into place and then starting it.

When I did this to 
move to 4.1 the end result was that decludeproc was started but nothing was 
being processed.

When I reversed the 
steps and put 4.09.4 back everything was ok again.

Has something 
changed here?

Also is a full 
updated needed to get the new GUI?

thank 
you

Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1

2006-04-06 Thread Harry Vanderzand



I am waiting for their response.

How does one get the GUI?

Maybe I am being obtuse here but I am not getting 
it.

Your answer is the same that support gave 
me.

I download decludeproc4.1 and install it.where does 
the dui come from if I do not need the full install?

Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 519-741-1222


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David 
  BarkerSent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:53 AMTo: 
  Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 
  changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1
  
  1. Harry please contact support at declude regarding your 
  issue of upgrading.
  2. The GUI is independent of the install you do not need 
  the full update.
  
  David B
  www.declude.com
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry 
  VanderzandSent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:49 AMTo: 
  Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] changing 
  decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1
  
  I have always done 
  the updates by stopping the decludeproc service, putting the new decludeproc 
  into place and then starting it.
  
  When I did this to 
  move to 4.1 the end result was that decludeproc was started but nothing was 
  being processed.
  
  When I reversed 
  the steps and put 4.09.4 back everything was ok again.
  
  Has something 
  changed here?
  
  Also is a full 
  updated needed to get the new GUI?
  
  thank 
  you
  
  Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222
  


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 4.09.4 to 4.1

2006-04-06 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Thank you

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
 Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:19 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 
 4.09.4 to 4.1
 
 All downloads are available from the Declude My Account home 
 page www.declude.com/login.asp the GUI download is titled 
 Declude Graphical User Interface. And yes the answer is the 
 same as support gave you because I was the person who 
 answered you I could not figure out why you were posting the 
 same question to the lists. :)
 
 If decludeproc 4.1 is not working for you phone us so we can 
 help you get it running. I am not sure what you are doing incorrectly.
 
 David B
 www.declude.com
 
 
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Harry Vanderzand
 Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:13 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 
 4.09.4 to 4.1
 
 
 I am waiting for their response.
  
 How does one get the GUI?
  
 Maybe I am being obtuse here but I am not getting it.
  
 Your answer is the same that support gave me.
  
 I download decludeproc4.1 and install it. where does the dui 
 come from if I do not need the full install?
  
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 inTown Internet  Computer Services
 519-741-1222
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
   Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:53 AM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc 
 from 4.09.4 to
 4.1
   
   
   1. Harry please contact support at declude regarding 
 your issue of upgrading.
   2. The GUI is independent of the install you do not 
 need the full update.

   David B
   www.declude.com
 
 
 
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Harry Vanderzand
   Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:49 AM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] changing decludeproc from 
 4.09.4 to 4.1
   
   
   I have always done the updates by stopping the 
 decludeproc service, putting the new decludeproc into place 
 and then starting it.

   When I did this to move to 4.1 the end result was that 
 decludeproc was started but nothing was being processed.

   When I reversed the steps and put 4.09.4 back 
 everything was ok again.

   Has something changed here?

   Also is a full updated needed to get the new GUI?

   thank you

 
   Harry Vanderzand 
   inTown Internet  Computer Services 
   11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
   519-741-1222
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Title: Message



Judgement is quick to pass for some around 
here.

These are getting caught by my system

X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: SBL [28], SORBS-DUHL [4], 
HELOBOGUS [3], SNIFFER [13]

Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 519-741-1222


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  ErikSent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:49 PMTo: 
  Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged 
  Image Files
  
  
  The problem that we've seen this 
  "spammer" is that the image is corrupted as you mentioned... and Declude is 
  exiting; thus why it's being allowed to be delivered. "Smart" coding on the 
  spammer... Not so smart on Declude.
  -Erik
  
  

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave 
BeckstromSent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 6:41 PMTo: 
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comCc: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image 
Files

We’re getting 
the same. Also using Declude with smartermail. Because Declude 
doesn’t appear to be scanning the headers there is no way for us to stop 
them.








From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans MartinSent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:38 
AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged 
Image Files

I’m 
getting a lot of messages that have only a graphic in them. The 
graphic appears to have been damaged as only about ½ of it displays. 
Declude has not modified the headers at all so I’m not sure if these are 
being scanned or not. I don’t know how it could be bypassing 
Declude. I have attached the .msg file. Anyone have any ideas 
what might be causing this?

I’m 
running Declude 3.0.5.22 and SmarterMail 2.6.


The 
header is as follows:

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 28 
00:24:32 2006
Received: from 225-65-10-72.planters.net 
[72.10.65.225] by matrix.martek.net with SMTP;
 Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:24:32 
-0600
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:24:22 
+0100
Return-path: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: 
"Abrahams"[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: C1alis 10 Pills 20 mg 
$89.95
Message-ID: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: 
multipart/related;
 
type="multipart/alternative";
 
boundary="ms020700070106060404020304"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 
6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2900.2180


Thanks,
Evans Martin


EVANS MARTIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOSTING: http://www.martek.net
PROGRAMMING: http://www.martekware.com

iPlus Info Browser – IPB’s IMail Migration Tool, 
password browser, reporting suite make IPlus Info Browser something no IMail 
administrator should be without. http://www.martek.net/Default.aspx?tabid=96



[Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006.02a

2006-02-17 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Is any one on this version of Imail yet?

How has the upgrade process been for you?

I understand that there were a lot of issues at the beginning?

Have the latest patches resolved them for you?

I appreciate your feedback as we are trying to plan when we will take the
plunge

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
 Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:35 AM
 To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.Virus] Multiple ban notice eml's
 
 Is it possible to have two different bannotify messages (as 
 in bannotify.eml and bannotify2.eml)?  As postmaster I need 
 to get notices on all held banned messages.  But I want the 
 second EML to use ONLYSENDIFRECIP and sent the notice to 
 select recipients.
 
 If yes, this leads to the second question.  Can us specify 
 multiple ONLYSENDIFRECIP entries in EML?  As in:
 
 ONLYSENDIFRECIP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ONLYSENDIFRECIP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ONLYSENDIFRECIP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: %ALLRECIPS%
 Blah, blah ...
 
 Thanks,
 John
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

2006-02-12 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Where do I find this information.

I logged on the your site and don't see any on the my account page.

I realize it must be obvious to you but it is not to me.

Can you please let me know where this information is?

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Simpson
 Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:22 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0
 
 Each customer has a price on their host record which reflects 
 their individual special price. This is confidential for each 
 customer and I will not be posting details on a public forum.
 
 We are currently developing some documentation that should be 
 published next week outlining changes and future strategy. As 
 soon as this is available we will inform our customers.
 
 Barry
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
 Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:03 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0
 
 I misspoke... switch SA for upgrade.  Also, please answer the 
 implicit questions at the end of the email as well.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Darin.
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Barry Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 9:54 AM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0
 
 
 Darin,
 
 The Service Agreement prices have not changed:
 
 JunkMail - $132.00 per year
 EVA - $132.00 per year
 HiJack - $45.00 per year
 
 Barry
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
 Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 9:36 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0
 
 Hi David,
 
 What I was trying to get was an actual price matrix.  For example,
 
 1. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Pro and EVA
 Pro?
 2. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Pro and EVA
 Standard?
 3. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Pro and EVA
 Lite?
 4. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Standard and
 EVA Pro?
 5. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Standard and
 EVA Standard?
 6. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Standard and
 EVA Lite?
 7. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Lite and EVA
 Pro?
 8. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Lite and EVA
 Standard?
 9. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Lite and EVA
 Lite?
 10. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Pro only?
 11. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Standard
 only?
 12. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 JM Lite only?
 13. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 EVA Pro only?
 14. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 EVA Standard
 only?
 15. What is the price of an SA when the existing customer has 
 EVA Lite only?
 
 This could be easily displayed as a 4x4 price matrix.  
 Posting it here, or
 perhaps posting a link to where it's posted on your website, 
 will save you a
 lot of phone calls and time.
 
 I think a lot of the confusion stems from calling the upcoming release
 version 4.  If the functionality will always remain the same 
 between 3 and
 4, then calling it a bundled service that is licensed 
 differently than the
 separately purchased products would be much more clear than 
 calling it a
 separate version.  If the functionality is going to change 
 between 3 and 4,
 then we need to know when and what, and how it affects 
 previous customers.
 I know you've stated there is no major difference now, but 
 everyone is
 concerned not just about now, but about the future 
 functionality, costs, and
 direction of the product.
 
 Darin.
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:29 PM
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0
 
 
 Darin,
 
 If you have JM Pro  EVA PRO  Hijack you can choose if you 
 want to run
 version 3 or version 4 in either case the SA applies as in point 2.
 
 2. Existing Customers prior to 8 Feb 06 CAN continue using the Service
 Agreement model. This mean you purchase a Annual Service 
 agreement to ensure
 support and having access to new releases of Declude for that 
 year. If your
 Service Agreement lapses you are still able to run Declude 
 you will just not
 have access to support or new releases.
 
 If you do NOT have JM Pro  EVA PRO  Hijack and choose not 
 to upgrade ...
 then you remain with version 3 as version 4 is licensed for 
 JM Pro  EVA PRO
  Hijack as I have explained

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

2006-02-12 Thread Harry Vanderzand



You guys go on and on.

Have you actually talked to Declude?

There are no changes for you if you do not want 
them.

And Moving to V4 is easy.

You must have a lot of time to waste, fret and 
worry.

If you would only communicate with them. I realize 
there have been misunderstandings and some mail was not received by 
many.

Give them a break.

All your demand are not appropriate on this 
list.

YI am 
amazed with the time you spend on conjecture and assumptions that just do not 
have any foundation.

I have 
discussed and clarified things with Declude and am totally 
satisfied.

The 
sky is not falling!
Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 519-741-1222


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  MattSent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 3:10 PMTo: 
  Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 
  3.0 / 4.0
  Barry,Before you publish your future strategy, you should 
  take a lot more time to consider the willingness of your customers to come 
  along. I have never heard of a similar piece of software that 
  expires in this way, and effectively forces a customer to renew their 
  license. The only things that are remotely close are Microsoft products 
  which are sold a different way for volume licensing, but they offer these 
  subscriptions at a price that is just a fraction of the full product price, 
  they are generally considered to be discounted by the companies purchasing 
  them, and the choice is optional to choose the subscription or the standard 
  purchase. That is clearly not the case here.Declude is not a 
  service, it's a piece of software, and I expect to pay for software the way 
  that software is paid for. I will never pay an annual license to use 
  such a piece of software. Never. Especially when that piece of 
  software requires me to pay for multiple other products in order to have 
  acceptable protection, and work many long hours in developing plug-ins to 
  enhance functionality that doesn't exist in the product itself. The 
  strength of Declude is it's flexibility as a framework, but not as a solution 
  in itself. There is a major disconnect between your perception of the 
  market, and what I an others on this end see.While this model might 
  seem appealing to you, it is grossly uncompetitive, and it comes at an 
  incredibly inopportune time. We as a community have been mostly 
  understanding of the disruption associated with the change of ownership, but 
  up to this point there has been only small advancements in the product that 
  benefit us. With the exception of one piece of added functionality, I 
  could still be using the same release that I was using two years ago when you 
  took over the company. Whether or not it is apparent to you, it is very 
  apparent to the majority of your customers that I communicate with that the 
  product is lagging, and not it is being priced uncompetitively on top of 
  that. People who are one day faced with the prospect of renewing a 
  service agreement and feeling angry over not having used a single release in 
  the previous year are now being faced with a choice between a dead-end product 
  (non-annually licensed software), and upgrading to an annual license at a 
  greatly increased price.The issues with development and price on their 
  own aren't my only concerns. Since I see this as grossly uncompetitive, 
  I also worry about whether or not Declude can be a going concern under these 
  conditions, and a large part of my own business has been built on top of the 
  functionality that the product offers. I don't perceive the possibility 
  of success in this model, and I likewise don't believe that I can rely on 
  Declude going forward as long as this is the model that you choose. As a 
  business person, I must protect my own interests and find a suitable solution 
  for my needs.It's not yet too late to rethink your licensing and other 
  plans going forward, but I fear that you won't get very far before the damage 
  can't be undone.MattBarry Simpson 
  wrote: 
  Each customer has a price on their host record which reflects their
individual special price. This is confidential for each customer and I will
not be posting details on a public forum.

We are currently developing some documentation that should be published next
week outlining changes and future strategy. As soon as this is available we
will inform our customers.

Barry

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 10:03 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0 / 4.0

I misspoke... switch SA for upgrade.  Also, please answer the implicit
questions at the end of the email as well.

Thanks,

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: "Barry Simpson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 9:54 AM
S

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Server Watching.

2006-01-23 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Whatsup gold by ipswitch

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Jerod M. Bennett
 Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 2:25 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Server Watching.
 
 Hey,
 
 I know this is off topic, but I respect the knowledge and 
 opinions of the people on this list.
 
 What software / services do you guys use to watch your 
 servers for up/down status?
 
 -Jerry
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer in Persistent Mode using Windows Resource Kit Tools

2006-01-18 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I am confused with step 6

6. Next Add a Value and type this information Value Name:Application Data
Type: REG_SZ (String)
String: [full path of your sniffer installation]\snfrv2r3.exe
xnk05x5vmipeaof7 persistent


What is the Value name???

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
 Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:15 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer in Persistent Mode using 
 Windows Resource Kit Tools
 
 Here is another method to install sniffer in persistent mode.
  
 I just want to share it with you and others out there. I hope 
 it is useful.
 I am not sure if there is information about how to install 
 persistent mode using the windows resource kit tools in this 
 list. So I decided to post it just in case.
 
 I have tested for a week and it works fine for me under Windows 2003
  
 I switched to it, since RunSvcExe started to show some errors 
 in my event viewer
  
  
 ==Sniffer in Persistent Mode Using Windows Resource Kit Tools==
 
 1. Create a directory in C: called for example reskit c:\reskit
  
 2. Place the following windows NT/2000/2003 windows resource 
 kit files (they are free). Download the kit from 
 microsoft.com instsrv.exe srvany.exe
  
 3. Run the following command line
 c:\reskit\instsrv.exe Declude Sniffer c:\reskit\Srvany.exe
  
 that will set a service under the name  Declude Sniffer
  
 4. Open your registry
 and look for the key
 HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Declude Sniffer
  
 5. Then add a key and name it Parameters
 
 6. Next Add a Value and type this information Value 
 Name:Application Data Type: REG_SZ (String)
 String: [full path of your sniffer installation]\snfrv2r3.exe
 xnk05x5vmipeaof7 persistent
  
 Note for licensed users: replace snfrv2re.exe with your 
 licenced sniffer application name and xnk05x5vmipeaof7 with 
 the licenced code.
  
 7. In your Services Manager locate the service named Declude 
 Sniffer and start it. 
  
 8. Set the Startup Type to Automatic.
  
 You are set to go.
  
 TO REMOVE THE SERVICE---
 if you want to remove the service just type the following 
 command line c:\reskit\instsrv.exe Declude Sniffer REMOVE
 
   -Luis Arango
 
 __
 [Email scanned for viruses]
 [Email escaneado contra virus]
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam leak?

2006-01-13 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Yes, I did

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
 Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 8:48 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam leak?
 
 Ummm... Did anybody else get a piece of spam this morning with subject
 SPAMSPCE: that seems to have been relayed through Declude.com?
 
 -Dave Doherty
  Skywaves, Inc. 
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v3 CPU usage and processing speed

2006-01-13 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I have a similar machine, generally running well

My declude.cfg is:

threads 75
waitformail 0
waitforthreads 25
waitbetweenthreads 100
winsockcleanup  off

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
 Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:11 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v3 CPU usage and 
 processing speed
 
 
 
  I have worked with customers with similar Dual-Xeon CPU 
 setup and have 
  seen processing of 1000+ emails per minute.
 
 We have two of this machines here. It has exactly the same 
 config from the screw who hold the server in the rack up to 
 each dot in the junkmail config file (except the license codes ;-)
 
 The first server seems processing messages faster then the second.
 On the second server the more I play with values the lower 
 CPU-usage and processing goes. After each reboot of 
 decludeproc it's going down a little bit. Neither a reboot 
 solved the problem. When I block incomming SMTP-traffic on 
 the second server it will process around 50 messages per 
 minute by showing up an average CPU usage way below of 50% 
 (currently 20%)
 
 
  1. What is your THREADS in the Declude.cfg ?
 
 Everything from 5 up to 500
 
 
  2. Are you running many large filters ?
 
 I've tried enabling und disabling many filters without any 
 noticeable change. But large filters should create a large cpu-usage. 
 
 
  3. How many virus scanners are you running ?
 
 Usualy two but I've also disabled the second for testing 
 without any result
 
 
  4. Is hyperthreading turned ON or OFF ?
 
 Yes task manager is showing up 4 cpu's
 
 
  5. Are you using any other Directives in your declude.cfg ?
 
 Beside THREADS I've currently in use
 
 WAITFORMAIL   5000
 WINSOCKCLEANUP   ON
 
 I've tried changing WAITFORMAIL up to 15000 ms as suggested 
 by another v3 Admin and I've also tried  adding
 
 WAITFORTHREADS1500
 WAITBETWEENTHREADS   1
 
 With values from 150 .. 1500 and 1 .. 1000 without any 
 noticeable change in the task manager cpu usage.
 
 The number of queue files in the proc folder is going up and 
 down (something between 1000 and 12000 files) The server is 
 working and delivery messages but only with 50% of his power 
 and speed.
 
 Netstat is showing around 100 ETSABLISHED connections and 
 around 50 in TIME_WAIT The process list in the task manager 
 is showing up around 50 entries
 
 
 Markus
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] SMTP failure

2006-01-02 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I get the following error about once a week since upgrading to V8.22 from
8.05.  This error occurs twice in a row and then the SMTP service remains in
a stopped state.  I can manually restart it.  The recovery settings for the
service are set to restart.  I have worked with Ipswitch on this issue and
they have no answer for me. Apparently a more senior person is looking at it
although I am not sure if that is true.  Does anyone have any ideas as to
the cause of this. The mail is down off course when this happens so It is
rather irritating.  Especially over the holiday time.

System Log error: 

The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( SMTPd32 ) cannot be found.
The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or
message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following
information is part of the event: SMTPd32 error: 231, ERR 004 - Failed to
create server Pipe..

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] What can be done with undelivery receipts?

2005-12-28 Thread Harry Vanderzand
With the increase of undelivery receipts caused by spam using spoofed
addresses of my clients, is there any way to more effectively catch those
receipts?

We are using imail 8.22 and the latest versions of declude pro, sniffer and
invuribl

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
519-741-1222


 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Samuel J Stanaitis
 Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 9:23 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DSPAM with Declude?
 
 Good Morning, Folks
 
 I've had a recent onslaught of emails completely blowing past Declude.
 They're the typical winky improvement pill ads, coming from 
 random sources, random names, random email addresses.  First 
 line of the email is a random URL, followed by cryptic 
 spellings of the various winky pills.  I've fed dozens to 
 SpamAssassin with no luck.
 
 I've heard good reviews of DSPAM (dspam.nuclearelephant.com) 
 and would like to incorporate it into Declude.  Has anyone 
 done this yet?  I searched the archives and have had no luck.
 
 Any tips?
 
 Thanks,
 Sam
  
 Samuel J Stanaitis, Network Administrator Decorative Product 
 Source, Inc.
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc terminating unexpectedly

2005-12-13 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I have a situation where the decludeproc service terminates unexpectedly.
It restarts, but I am concerned in that the system is not stable.  Several
messages are left in the review directory when this happens.

Shortly after one of the decludeproc restarts this morning the SMTP service
stopped and did NOT restart.  The event log had the following error:

The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( SMTPd32 ) cannot be found.
The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or
message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The following
information is part of the event: SMTPd32 error: 231, ERR 004 - Failed to
create server Pipe..

This has happened a few times since going to imail V8.22 from 8.05.  Should
I install imail 2006?  I have it but am holding off as I fear more problems
if I am an early adopter.

Any ideas?

Imail V8.22, declude pro, sniffer, invuirbl
Dual xeon 3.4Ghz, 2GB ram

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc terminating unexpectedly

2005-12-13 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Sorry 3.05.22

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John 
 T (Lists)
 Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:37 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc terminating unexpectedly
 
 What version of Declude?
 
 John T
 eServices For You
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand
  Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 9:31 AM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc terminating unexpectedly
  
  I have a situation where the decludeproc service terminates 
 unexpectedly.
  It restarts, but I am concerned in that the system is not stable.  
  Several messages are left in the review directory when this happens.
  
  Shortly after one of the decludeproc restarts this morning the SMTP
 service
  stopped and did NOT restart.  The event log had the following error:
  
  The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( SMTPd32 ) 
 cannot be found.
  The local computer may not have the necessary registry 
 information or 
  message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. The
 following
  information is part of the event: SMTPd32 error: 231, ERR 
 004 - Failed 
  to create server Pipe..
  
  This has happened a few times since going to imail V8.22 from 8.05.
 Should
  I install imail 2006?  I have it but am holding off as I fear more
 problems
  if I am an early adopter.
  
  Any ideas?
  
  Imail V8.22, declude pro, sniffer, invuirbl Dual xeon 
 3.4Ghz, 2GB ram
  
  Thank you
  
  Harry Vanderzand
  inTown Internet  Computer Services
  11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
  519-741-1222
  
  
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
  
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
  unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] CBL:Fw: news

2005-12-06 Thread Harry Vanderzand



We have it blocked with the following 
tests

X-Note: Total spam 
weight of this E-mail is 25.X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: SORBS-DUHL [4], 
NJABL-DYNABLOCK [9], FIVETEN-SPAM [5], CMDSPACE [7], WEIGHT10 [10], WEIGHT11 
[11], WEIGHT12 [12], WEIGHT15 [15], WEIGHT19 [19]

Harry Vanderzand inTown Internet  Computer Services 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2519-741-1222


  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard 
  FarrisSent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 2:25 PMTo: 
  Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] CBL:Fw: 
  news
  
  Does anyone have an answer to filter these type 
  emails?
  Richard FarrisEthixs 
  Online1.270.247. Office1.800.548.3877 Tech Support"Crossroads 
  to a Cleaner Internet"
  - Original Message - 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 3:20 AM
  Subject: news
   



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] outgoing mail declude junkmail

2005-11-18 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Travis what you have there is the rule defined

Now you need to have an action

IE
Weight10hold
Weight20delete

By the way you make it confusing by saying weight10 is a hold at 16.

Why not call it weight16?

That is still the difficulty with Declude.  A whole language needs to be
learned.  It will be nice if this ever joins the GUI world

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Travis Sullivan
 Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:05 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] outgoing mail declude junkmail
 
 WEIGHT10  weight  x x 16 0
 WEIGHT20  weight  x x 20 0
 
 That is what I have at the bottom of mine... 16 is my hold 
 weight, 20 is delete.  What do I use for outgoing mail actions?
 
 Travis
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 12:01 PM
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006 standalone
 
 
  Yes, and those actions are defined in your global.cfg at the bottom.
  Darrell
  
 --
 --
  Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for 
 Declude And 
  Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI 
 integration, 
  MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
 
 
  Travis Sullivan writes:
  Okay, it was simple I didn't have any XOUTHEADER 
 specified in the 
  global.cfg so declude is scanning outgoing mail. but, 
 i noticed the 
  score was 17, one point above my hold weight... is there different 
  actions for outgoing mail as in hold/delete? Travis - Original 
  Message - From: Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:19 AM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006 standalone
  It's pretty simple.  take all of the actions you have 
 defined in your
  $default$.config and copy them to your global.cfg. 
 Actions placed in the 
  Global.cfg apply to outgoing scanning.  Actions in the
  $default$.config apply to incoming scanning. Darin. - 
 Original 
  Message - From: Travis Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 12:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 2006 standalone I 
 searched, not a 
  lot to be honest, the archive, and manual,  but couldn't
  find info on setting up outgoing mail scanning with 
 declude pro 1.82. 
  Does
  anyone have a primer or at least some notes to share with me? TIA 
  Travis ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com. ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
   ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
  
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cryptic URL in source

2005-11-10 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Yes that would work.

However I want a method that traps all mail that uses this deceptive
practice.

Is there no way to detect this trick?

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave 
 Beckstrom
 Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 5:28 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cryptic URL in source
 
 No problem.  
 
 
 BODY   500contains google.com/url?q=
 
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet
  Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:20 PM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cryptic URL in source
  
  I've been getting reports of that from customers all day.
  
  G.Z.
  
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Harry Vanderzand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:05 PM
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cryptic URL in source
  
  
  Certainly
  
  Here is what you see in the e-mail
  
  http://intown.net/HwSbgXkc9vYP4qssBQS0AK6bumsUuatFHAdxX6IZ8vk0
  
  Here is what is in the source:
  
  
 href=http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.google.com/url?q=http://%
  73%5
  4%
  41%09Nd%09%7aA.n%09e%74/%63%67i-
  b%09%69n%09/%70%6fch/%72e%09di%72.%63g%69?s=
  
 intown.nethttp://intown.net/HwSbgXkc9vYP4qssBQS0AK6bumsUuatFHAdxX6IZ
  8vk0
  /
  a
  
  Not that different from some of the phishing e-mails
  
  This has got to be detectable and should be cause for 
 immediate deletion.
  
  Who has legitimate cause to hide their identity?
  
  Harry Vanderzand
  inTown Internet  Computer Services
  11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
  519-741-1222
  
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott 
   Fisher
   Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:40 PM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cryptic URL in source
  
   Do you have an example?
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Harry Vanderzand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 10:18 AM
   Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Cryptic URL in source
  
  
Any ideas on this?
   
When the URL is hidden with cryptic characters in the 
 source code 
of an e-mail it seems to me that it is obviously not a 
 legitimate 
e-mail in that deception is being used.
   
Is there not an easy way to stop e-mail where these 
 practises are 
being used?
   
I am running imail 8.21 and declude 3.05.18, the 
 latest sniffer 
and Invuribl
   
Assistance is appreciated
   
Thank you
   
Harry Vanderzand
inTown Internet  Computer Services
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222
   
   
   
   
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can 
 be found 
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
   
   
   
   
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
http://www.mail-archive.com.
   
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
 and type 
   unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
   http://www.mail-archive.com.
  
  
  
  
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
  unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
  
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
  unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Cryptic URL in source

2005-11-08 Thread Harry Vanderzand
When the URL is hidden with cryptic characters in the source code of an
e-mail it seems to me that it is obviously not a legitimate e-mail in that
deception is being used.

Is there not an easy way to stop e-mail where these practises are being
used?

I am running imail 8.21 and declude 3.05.18, the latest sniffer and Invuribl

Assistance is appreciated

Thank you

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-06 Thread Harry Vanderzand
The problems I reported below in 3.05.14 are now corrected in 3.05.18

I installed it Saturday AM and it has run fine since then

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Harry Vanderzand
 Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:23 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue
 
 I was just checking my declude directories and found mail 
 sitting in the review directory.  95 pieces with varying 
 times since my update to 30514 yesterday.  When I put them 
 back into the proc directory the system slowed down and they 
 ended up back in the review directory eventually. I then 
 reverted to 30509, put the mail back into the proc directory 
 and everything got processed fine.
 
 I then reverted back to 30514 and watched the flow of mail 
 and again mail started collecting in the review directory.
 
 I have gone back to 30509 till there is a resolution for this
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 inTown Internet  Computer Services
 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
 519-741-1222
 
  
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-01 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I was just checking my declude directories and found mail sitting in the
review directory.  95 pieces with varying times since my update to 30514
yesterday.  When I put them back into the proc directory the system slowed
down and they ended up back in the review directory eventually. I then
reverted to 30509, put the mail back into the proc directory and everything
got processed fine.

I then reverted back to 30514 and watched the flow of mail and again mail
started collecting in the review directory.

I have gone back to 30509 till there is a resolution for this

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

2005-10-25 Thread Harry Vanderzand
It seems to me that something changed in the code

If all I do is change from V9 to V11 and I see a noticeable difference, then
it has to be caused by a change in the code from V9 to V11.  No other
hardware or software was changed!!!

I have gotten direction to change settings, however that in no way addresses
the point I am making.

I have not seen that addressed.

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
 Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:33 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Okay, I'm watching these discussions - as I'm still truly 
 scared of upgrading Declude.
 
 I just can't figure out the logic behind all the CPU 
 consumption and why certain process parameters are suspected 
 to have detrimental effects.
 
 
 Please verify my thinking:
 
 A machine that needs to process a given amount of mail will 
 require a certain number of instructions, which are reflected 
 in the total CPU usage.
 If several messages come in almost simultaneously, then I can 
 either process them right away using parallel processes, 
 causing a short spike in CPU use - or I can process them one 
 by one, using up the same CPU time over time and causing a 
 few seconds delay in mail delivery.
 
 Either way, the overall CPU consumption should be the same - 
 just distributed differently.
 
 
 So - if the above is true, how do I explain the apparent 
 inconsistency where users report that the CPU consumption is 
 considerable higher than in the prior version? How can the 
 various process settings make any difference - at worst it 
 should spike quickly and then be idle?
 
 If the old Declude handled the amount of mail with moderate 
 CPU use and without causing noticeable delays in mail 
 delivery to the users - then I can't see how the same outcome 
 suddenly should require x times the CPU resources, no matter 
 how inefficient the process settings are? What is spending 
 all this other CPU time on? Looping, looking for directory content?
 
 
 Best Regards
 Andy Schmidt
 
 Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
 Fax:+1 201 934-9206 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
 Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:13 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 I changed the THREADS to 75 and CPU wnet down to about avg 
 50%.   I'll try
 WAITFORMAIL in just a bit.
 
 I also noticed in my spool folder I have a new folder called 
 s that appeared with the time stamp of the new proc 
 install.  There is nothing in it; just a blank folder. I deleted it.
 
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Randy Armbrecht
 Global Web Solutions, Inc.
 804-346-5300 x112
 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112
 http://globalweb.net
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
 Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:39 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Randy try changing
 
 WAITFORMAIL   1500
 
 To
 
 WAITFORMAIL   500
 
 See if that changes the delay.
 
 David B
 www.declude.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:16 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 We upgraded to 3.0.5.11 tonight - big difference in CPU in 
 that it's way down from the 3.0.5.5 - but proc folder will 
 accumulate approx 35-50 messages before it'll dump them to 
 the work folder.  Do not see any problems so far except for 
 the second or two delay in this...
 
 We have in our declude.cfg:
 THREADS   50
 WAITFORMAIL   1500
 WAITFORTHREADS  1000
 WAITBETWEENTHREADS1
 
 
 
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Randy Armbrecht
 Global Web Solutions, Inc.
 804-346-5300 x112
 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112
 http://globalweb.net
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Harry Vanderzand
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:52 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Cc: 'Technical Support'
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Dual Xeon 3.4Ghz 2GB ram  imail 8.05 declude, sniffer  invurbl
 
 The issue is that without changing anything other than going 
 to 3.05.11 this occurs
 
 It appears that processing has changed
 
 If I could get some idea from Declude about this. 
 
 Maybe I have to change my declude.cfg?
 
 It currently is
 
 threads   20
 waitformail 500
 waitforthreads 1500
 waitbetweenthreads 100
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 inTown Internet  Computer Services
 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
 519-741-1222
 
  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
  Sent

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

2005-10-25 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I have repeatedly switch back and forth between the two version (V9 and V11)

I assure that I have changed nothing else and that cpu usage is higher on
the V11

I watch V9 cpu usage
I go from V9 to V11 and cpu usage increases
Back to V9: it goes down
Back to V11 it goes up.

How else does one state this problem?

It would make a lot of sense if Declude were to say that they have made a
change in the code that would cause this, but that is not the case.



Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
 Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 4:14 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Andy, don't be scared I can hold you hand :)
 
  How do I explain the apparent inconsistency where users 
 report that 
  the
 CPU consumption is considerable higher than in the prior version? 
 
 First we need to confirm that it is decludeproc that has 
 increased in CPU usage. So far I have not seen any real 
 statistics for this other than what has been posted on the 
 boards. But I am certainly trying to validate this information.
 
  How can the various process settings make any difference 
 - at worst 
  it
 should spike quickly and then be idle?
 
 Why do you think it should spike and then become idle ?
 
  What is spending all this other CPU time on? Looping, looking for
 directory content?
 
 Perhaps an incorrect assumption, Declude actually uses less 
 CPU, between 3% and 20% on average.
 
 David B
 www.declude.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
 Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:33 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Okay, I'm watching these discussions - as I'm still truly 
 scared of upgrading Declude.
 
 I just can't figure out the logic behind all the CPU 
 consumption and why certain process parameters are suspected 
 to have detrimental effects.
 
 
 Please verify my thinking:
 
 A machine that needs to process a given amount of mail will 
 require a certain number of instructions, which are reflected 
 in the total CPU usage.
 If several messages come in almost simultaneously, then I can 
 either process them right away using parallel processes, 
 causing a short spike in CPU use - or I can process them one 
 by one, using up the same CPU time over time and causing a 
 few seconds delay in mail delivery.
 
 Either way, the overall CPU consumption should be the same - 
 just distributed differently.
 
 
 So - if the above is true, how do I explain the apparent 
 inconsistency where users report that the CPU consumption is 
 considerable higher than in the prior version? How can the 
 various process settings make any difference - at worst it 
 should spike quickly and then be idle?
 
 If the old Declude handled the amount of mail with moderate 
 CPU use and without causing noticeable delays in mail 
 delivery to the users - then I can't see how the same outcome 
 suddenly should require x times the CPU resources, no matter 
 how inefficient the process settings are? What is spending 
 all this other CPU time on? Looping, looking for directory content?
 
 
 Best Regards
 Andy Schmidt
 
 Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
 Fax:+1 201 934-9206 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
 Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:13 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 I changed the THREADS to 75 and CPU wnet down to about avg 
 50%.   I'll try
 WAITFORMAIL in just a bit.
 
 I also noticed in my spool folder I have a new folder called 
 s that appeared with the time stamp of the new proc 
 install.  There is nothing in it; just a blank folder. I deleted it.
 
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Randy Armbrecht
 Global Web Solutions, Inc.
 804-346-5300 x112
 877-800-GLOBAL (4562) x112
 http://globalweb.net
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
 Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:39 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Randy try changing
 
 WAITFORMAIL   1500
 
 To
 
 WAITFORMAIL   500
 
 See if that changes the delay.
 
 David B
 www.declude.com
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 7:16 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 We upgraded to 3.0.5.11 tonight - big difference in CPU in 
 that it's way down from the 3.0.5.5 - but proc folder will 
 accumulate approx 35-50 messages before it'll dump them to 
 the work folder.  Do not see any problems so far except for 
 the second or two delay

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

2005-10-24 Thread Harry Vanderzand
Dual Xeon 3.4Ghz 2GB ram  imail 8.05 declude, sniffer  invurbl

The issue is that without changing anything other than going to 3.05.11 this
occurs

It appears that processing has changed

If I could get some idea from Declude about this. 

Maybe I have to change my declude.cfg?

It currently is

threads 20
waitformail 500
waitforthreads 1500
waitbetweenthreads 100

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:30 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Interesting ... .11 is working for me better than any 
 previous version -- proc and work are quickly cleared.  
 
 What process is jumping the CPU up so high? Decludeproc or 
 the anti-virus
 scanner(s) or something else?  How about some more info (CPU, 
 RAM, declude.cfg contents, do you run AVAFTERJM?, that kind of thing.)
 
 John
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Harry Vanderzand
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 12:10 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 When I switch from 3.05.9 to 3.05.11 CPU usage goes up 
 considerably and mail gets processed much slower and starts 
 to backlog.
 
 I have had to switch back to 3.05.9
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 inTown Internet  Computer Services
 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
 519-741-1222
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

2005-10-24 Thread Harry Vanderzand
It works better but also changes the behaviour somewhat.

The way I had it, it continuously kept the proc directory empty because once
threads were available it brought mail into the work directory

Now it does start more threads as they are available.

I like the behaviour the way it was

Can this be achieved again?

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:55 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Harry, try commenting out
 
 #waitforthreads 1500
 #waitbetweenthreads 100
 
 David B
 www.declude.com 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Harry Vanderzand
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:52 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Cc: 'Technical Support'
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Dual Xeon 3.4Ghz 2GB ram  imail 8.05 declude, sniffer  invurbl
 
 The issue is that without changing anything other than going 
 to 3.05.11 this occurs
 
 It appears that processing has changed
 
 If I could get some idea from Declude about this. 
 
 Maybe I have to change my declude.cfg?
 
 It currently is
 
 threads   20
 waitformail 500
 waitforthreads 1500
 waitbetweenthreads 100
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 inTown Internet  Computer Services
 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
 519-741-1222
 
  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
  Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:30 PM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
  
  Interesting ... .11 is working for me better than any 
 previous version 
  -- proc and work are quickly cleared.
  
  What process is jumping the CPU up so high? Decludeproc or the 
  anti-virus
  scanner(s) or something else?  How about some more info (CPU, RAM, 
  declude.cfg contents, do you run AVAFTERJM?, that kind of thing.)
  
  John
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry 
  Vanderzand
  Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 12:10 PM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
  
  When I switch from 3.05.9 to 3.05.11 CPU usage goes up considerably 
  and mail gets processed much slower and starts to backlog.
  
  I have had to switch back to 3.05.9
  
  Harry Vanderzand
  inTown Internet  Computer Services
  11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
  519-741-1222
  
  
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
  unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
  
  
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
  unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
  
  
 
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and 
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be 
 found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

2005-10-24 Thread Harry Vanderzand
You would think but remember that all I did was change from V9 to V11 and
behaviour changed.

Threads @ 150 just does not work.  It took a long time of experimenting with
settings to reach 25 which worked well

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 4:36 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Someone correct me, but with 3.4GHz couldn't you try THREADS 
 150 and back down from there if needed?  Wouldn't that help some?
 
 From http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=167
 Performance can vary due to server configuration, CPU load, 
 available memory, email traffic, the suggested THREADS is 25 
 per 1 GHZ CPU. To find peak performance increase your threads 
 so that your CPU usage bounces to the 100% mark and down 
 again. If your CPU is pegged at 100% try reduce the threads 
 by increments of 5 each time till you see the desired result.
 
 John 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Harry Vanderzand
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:00 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 It works better but also changes the behaviour somewhat.
 
 The way I had it, it continuously kept the proc directory 
 empty because once threads were available it brought mail 
 into the work directory
 
 Now it does start more threads as they are available.
 
 I like the behaviour the way it was
 
 Can this be achieved again?
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 inTown Internet  Computer Services
 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
 519-741-1222
 
  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 David Barker
  Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:55 PM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
  
  Harry, try commenting out
  
  #waitforthreads 1500
  #waitbetweenthreads 100
  
  David B
  www.declude.com
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry 
  Vanderzand
  Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:52 PM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Cc: 'Technical Support'
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
  
  Dual Xeon 3.4Ghz 2GB ram  imail 8.05 declude, sniffer  invurbl
  
  The issue is that without changing anything other than going to 
  3.05.11 this occurs
  
  It appears that processing has changed
  
  If I could get some idea from Declude about this. 
  
  Maybe I have to change my declude.cfg?
  
  It currently is
  
  threads 20
  waitformail 500
  waitforthreads 1500
  waitbetweenthreads 100
  
  Harry Vanderzand
  inTown Internet  Computer Services
  11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
  519-741-1222
  
   
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 John Carter
   Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:30 PM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
   
   Interesting ... .11 is working for me better than any
  previous version
   -- proc and work are quickly cleared.
   
   What process is jumping the CPU up so high? Decludeproc or the 
   anti-virus
   scanner(s) or something else?  How about some more info 
 (CPU, RAM, 
   declude.cfg contents, do you run AVAFTERJM?, that kind of thing.)
   
   John
   
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry 
   Vanderzand
   Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 12:10 PM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
   
   When I switch from 3.05.9 to 3.05.11 CPU usage goes up 
 considerably 
   and mail gets processed much slower and starts to backlog.
   
   I have had to switch back to 3.05.9
   
   Harry Vanderzand
   inTown Internet  Computer Services
   11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
   519-741-1222
   
   
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
 and type 
   unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
   http://www.mail-archive.com.
   
   
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
 and type 
   unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
   http://www.mail-archive.com.
   
   
  
  
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type 
  unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
  http://www.mail-archive.com.
  
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem

2005-10-24 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I guess I can start retuning all over again but I am concerned about why
this is occurring

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services 
11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
519-741-1222

 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 4:40 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Yes, again the ideal is that the CPU usage bounces, So you 
 could start at 150 then if it pegged at 100% CPU try 125 etc.
 
 David B
 www.declude.com 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 4:36 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 Someone correct me, but with 3.4GHz couldn't you try THREADS 
 150 and back down from there if needed?  Wouldn't that help some?
 
 From http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=167
 Performance can vary due to server configuration, CPU load, 
 available memory, email traffic, the suggested THREADS is 25 
 per 1 GHZ CPU. To find peak performance increase your threads 
 so that your CPU usage bounces to the 100% mark and down 
 again. If your CPU is pegged at 100% try reduce the threads 
 by increments of 5 each time till you see the desired result.
 
 John 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Harry Vanderzand
 Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:00 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
 
 It works better but also changes the behaviour somewhat.
 
 The way I had it, it continuously kept the proc directory 
 empty because once threads were available it brought mail 
 into the work directory
 
 Now it does start more threads as they are available.
 
 I like the behaviour the way it was
 
 Can this be achieved again?
 
 Harry Vanderzand
 inTown Internet  Computer Services
 11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
 519-741-1222
 
  
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 David Barker
  Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:55 PM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
  
  Harry, try commenting out
  
  #waitforthreads 1500
  #waitbetweenthreads 100
  
  David B
  www.declude.com
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry 
  Vanderzand
  Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:52 PM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Cc: 'Technical Support'
  Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
  
  Dual Xeon 3.4Ghz 2GB ram  imail 8.05 declude, sniffer  invurbl
  
  The issue is that without changing anything other than going to
  3.05.11 this occurs
  
  It appears that processing has changed
  
  If I could get some idea from Declude about this. 
  
  Maybe I have to change my declude.cfg?
  
  It currently is
  
  threads 20
  waitformail 500
  waitforthreads 1500
  waitbetweenthreads 100
  
  Harry Vanderzand
  inTown Internet  Computer Services
  11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
  519-741-1222
  
   
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 John Carter
   Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:30 PM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
   
   Interesting ... .11 is working for me better than any
  previous version
   -- proc and work are quickly cleared.
   
   What process is jumping the CPU up so high? Decludeproc or the 
   anti-virus
   scanner(s) or something else?  How about some more info 
 (CPU, RAM, 
   declude.cfg contents, do you run AVAFTERJM?, that kind of thing.)
   
   John
   
   
   
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry 
   Vanderzand
   Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 12:10 PM
   To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
   Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] 30511 problem
   
   When I switch from 3.05.9 to 3.05.11 CPU usage goes up 
 considerably 
   and mail gets processed much slower and starts to backlog.
   
   I have had to switch back to 3.05.9
   
   Harry Vanderzand
   inTown Internet  Computer Services
   11 Belmont Ave. W., Kitchener, ON,N2M 1L2
   519-741-1222
   
   
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
 and type 
   unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
   http://www.mail-archive.com.
   
   
   ---
   This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
   unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
 and type 
   unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found at 
   http://www.mail-archive.com.
   
   
  
  
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To 
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail

  1   2   >