withbroken images.
-Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
SchmidtSent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:36 PMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] Trying to
install Declude 3.1.20 anew
Hi,
I'm try
as the whitelisting.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc
Catuogno
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 3:28 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Test - can I post?
Checking to see if I can post...
---
This E-mail
their service.
Just as Scott Fisher said once awhile back (I believe it was him)... Ironic.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc
Catuogno
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 3:28 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject
Yes, it is a common place holder... But for how long? Shouldn't a
company be on top of that based on the type business they are in? Lookup
those IP ranges to see if they those ranges are listed on any list; use DNS
that is also not listed on any URI lookup? Normally, what... 7 to 10 days
and indicated so); but were very helpful into
understanding the Declude company and their search of engineers.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 11:20 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject
on their website for positions that are
open.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 11:47 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No Tests Run
John,
I guess my point is more about
Matt, is your Delcude gatewayed? Or is it running on the same server as
Imail?
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 5:58 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience
Title: Message
LOL,
had to laugh at Nick. I'll wait to hear from Matt after his upgrade before
we attempt to do it again. I think Matt's and our servers handle about the
same email volume.
-Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
tomer of their
product) based on the version we run.
So I'd
be interested to know on our your servers run the latest 3.0X version of
Declude.
Thanks!
-Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of MattSent: Monday, May 22, 2006
ur Declude
and Imail are on the same server.
Thanks,
-Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of MattSent: Monday, May 22, 2006 11:02
PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re:
[Declude.JunkMail] What happened to the logging
or the latest.
As with you, we've been on Declude since 1.26 as well. My point to David
was that he denied support when a support was sent based on the fact we do
not run the current version of Declude.
Ridiculously? Hardly... Read the posts.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
are just as ridiculous as
others. Refer to your post on 3/10/2006 with a subject of: OT: SPAM from
Invariant Systems.
Sometimes you need to Seek until you shall find.
No offense, John T. I know you and I have been on this list for a long
time.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
That's what I do. Separate email client for lists. That way my auto
responders; tag lines, high importance flag, return receipts (requests and
read) does not effect the lists I'm on.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
John,
Darrell caught the SPAM and removed them from his list. They are/were a
customer of Invariant Systems products and subed to his lists just like you
and I do. They posted to the list. But Darrell was quick to take action.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
John should adhere to his tag line: Seek, and ye shall find! ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 12:31 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
It is
our understanding that your provide support to those that have a SA with
you. We pay you for this. Our SA is current and has been since
2001.
Please
explain your words.
-Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,
March 06,
; read it and move on and learn. As with you, we too
have been with Declude for many years. You and I both know of it's up's and
down's and learning experience of the new Declude owners.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists
with Declude's confirm (yes a freebie); but
has worked since nearly it's concept.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:48 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B7BC7-18FF
Title: Message
Matt,
I have sent Declude what I sent you.
I'll
keep you and the list posted; if Declude does not.
Thanks
for your time and input,
Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of MattSent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 3
Title: Message
The problem that we've seen this
"spammer" is that the image is corrupted as you mentioned... and Declude is
exiting; thus why it's being allowed to be delivered. "Smart" coding on the
spammer... Not so smart on Declude.
-Erik
-Original Message
Damaged Image Files
The problem that we've seen this
"spammer" is that the image is corrupted as you mentioned... and Declude
is exiting; thus why it's being allowed to be delivered. "Smart" coding on
the spammer
Kami,
Thank you for the files; this is great! We can use this and customize for
us.
Thank you,
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 10:40 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE
Scott,
So Clam AV detects these? We do have Declude AV but, not the PRO version
and I think only this version can use multiple AV programs? We use the
standard with F-PROT.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Sunday
Title: Message
There's a manual for Declude? Where? hahaha joking... I
don't think the "manual" has been updated since the 14th
Century.
Every
timewe've needed to lookup a statement in Declude from searching on the
list that others are using; it's not in the "manual". A product should
Help from you all:
We've setup the following individual filters for major banks that are
phising scams (and ebay.com)
Do you see any problems with using the following (we mark as SPAM at weight
70):
HEADERS END NOTCONTAINS wellsfargo.com
BODY 0 CONTAINS .wellsfargo.com
SUBJECT 30 CONTAINS
I agree with Markus. First have a working product, then name it. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 10:46 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ? Name Voting
y in place. Their documentation is not update with
their product. It's a lot of time on the end user end.
-Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of MattSent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 9:10
PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re:
[Declud
understaning that COUNTRYCHAIN can NOT be used in a
filter.
-Erik
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail
For example:
NOTCONTAINS
Are these available?:
NOTENDSWITH
NOTSTARTSWITH
Thanks!
Erik
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type
Title: Message
Hi
Luis,
What
is your average count of inbound/outbound email messages on your server and what
type of server specs/speed?
-Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto ArangoSent
I agree! NOTSTARTSWITH would be useful.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:46 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What are all the NOT comparable statements
John,
We were at point blocking them or weighted them heavy until several of our
customers where complaining about missing emails.
In my opinion should be blocked; but we are letting them come in now as well
as elabs4.com. To me, they are on the same line as ed10.com, m0.net, etc.
Erik
I guess it is! We've had 2 reports day about it (and both ARE real estate
agents; say he is not on their list). Interesting
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 7:37 PM
To:
have with using FPROT's scheduler.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 1:13 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] F-Prot
A lot of times my server has an error
Simple BAT File:
-
C:\Program Files\FSI\F-Prot\FP-Updater\Updater.exe /INTERNET /QUIT /HIDDEN
-
We do not use a BAT file, it's just a command line in the Windows Task
Scheduler
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Yep, here too. The message exceeded weight of 200+ You'd think Declude
would know how to use the DELETE action of their software. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mail-lists
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 4:45 PM
To:
?
No, I'm not bashing Declude. We've been a Declude user since 2000. Just
pointing out the obvious.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 6:05 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE
have been an asset to this list and we've learned a lot by
it. But I was displeased with Andrew's generic brief response as in the
past; he's been helpful.
-Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of MattSent: Tuesday, January 31
: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Another forged Declude address e-mail?
Sorry, Erik, my short response to the list was not at
your expense, my URL was meant to indicatethatI feltit was
ironicthat a support list about an antispam product is being
spammeddespite
Title: Message
Got
it.
No,
don't give Andrew a hard time. We all need him.
:-)
-Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of MattSent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 8:43
PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re
We use (mostly): IPMonitor We also use our own scripts to monitor ports
(i.e., 80, 53, 110, 25, 587, etc). IPMonitor is customizable and effective.
http://ipmonitor.tsarfin.com
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerod M. Bennett
we'll switch their Imail product.
We've used a lot of IPSwitch products in the past years. And with
IPSwitch's stance on things; they are not in our line-up any more.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaj Søndergaard
Laursen
Sent
Hi Dave,
Look at this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg27075.html
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 4:03 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject
in that thread was discussion of some variants used to the CID html
coding. I believe Scott brought that up in his postings. Another thing
Scott brought up is that this spam campaign also fails the CMDSPACE in
Declude. We make use of that combo test TESTSFAILED when looking for the
CID tag.
Erik
. ;-)
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Beckstrom
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:12 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with filter
Erik,
I thought that the beginswith meant that we
Title: Message
Hi
Goran,
We use
CMDSPACE and SNIFFER as a combo and push it to our delete weight;
effective.
Also
we use CMDSPACE and INV-URIBL as a combo; effective but we weigh it slightly
lower and push it to our spam weight.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to ask those that having been using CMDSPACE; what percentage
of your weight do you assign to this?
TIA,
Erik
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
'skipifweight'
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gufler Markus
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 12:30 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] CMDSPACE Percent of Weight based on your
(DELETE) action
If you're able
sponses on this list to the 3.X
release.
Erik
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Andy SchmidtSent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:00
PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject:
[Declude.JunkMail] Hardware Issue -- NOT!
Hi David:
Than
and on the internet at the same time. If you lower the setting from
their default, you do not notice difference in voice or internet downloading;
and the voice quality is good.
Erik
-- Original Message --
From: Evans Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
Using CONTAINS will trap a lot of real email if that is the only line in
your filter.
Could try this and set up the $default$.junkmail to HOLD so you can monitor
the filter for false positives:
SKIPIFWEIGHT 125 --your delete weight
MAXWEIGHT 70 --your hold weight
BODY END NOTCONTAINS
Yep, I agree with Kevin. Using CONTAINS will trap a lot of legitimtate emails.
Scott posted a good filter to use if using DECLUDE and the external tests he
mentioned.
-Erik
-- Original Message --
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
Todd,
It is because this spam campaign is using Content-Type: image/gif in the
body. NOTCONTAINS means to skip that filter or test if the body does not
contain Content-Type: image/gif in the body.
Erik
-- Original Message --
From: Todd [EMAIL
testing that combo test with the use of another external
filter for COUNTRY.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 12:19 PM
To: Serge
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer
Wow, that would be great! :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 9:38 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
Erik,
I have also asked
this in our config as we still have the
ALL_LIST.DAT file.
http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=6KBSearchID=1012
I want
to be able to detect multiple countries and pass that to our external
program. But as Scott mentioned, externals are ran before
filters.
Erik
... But I believe filters are done last after External
comments.
If David's monitoring the list,
I think a list of what order the tests run in would be a great addition to
the Junkmail manual.
- Original Message -
From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Friday
looking at our CONFIG file for Declude, we do not use any COUNTRY or
COUNTRIES test (in the past I believe we did). Do you know if this needs to
be in the default config file or is it internal to Declude?
Thanks Scott for the thread.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
It would be nice if there was a directive that forced the tests to run as
they are in the order of which the appear in the CONFIG file. I know this
may/would be a performance decrease but it would give end users control of
external tests.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
:08 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Help in creating a Filter
One more comment. The country processing won't occur unless you have the
all_list.dat file in the declude folder.
- Original Message -
From: Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail
)
End If
If CountryChain CONTAINS UNITED STATES-destination Then
'Email is probably good (return zero)
Else
DELETE (triggers the filter - return 100 as weight)
End If
End If
Thanks!
Erik
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe
Can the %COUNTRYCHAIN% variable be used instead of %COUNTRIES%?
Right about be careful... But the MN-COMBO is a mix of 3 to 5 TESTSFAILED
combos already.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005
and/or start in USA then
bounce to another country, then back to USA.
Does anyone know (Darrell); if the %COUNTRYCHAIN% can be passed to an
external program? I've thought of developing an EXE that does this final
scan after MN-COMBO is tested.
TIA,
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yes, just put it in there.
I also think that it requires the PRO version to work ?
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 10:08 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re
I'll comment. ;-)
invURIBL and Sniffer are very effective. With these two alone we have
nearly removed ALL body/subject/header/etc... Filtering from Declude. The
email that you questioned about and as Darrell pointed out, did fail
invURIBL on our system as well.
Erik
-Original Message
receive more or less then us.) The above is based on our usage and
feedback. Each ISP/email server can be different.
-Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Rogers
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 9:48 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
We took block some IP's from Savvis:
64.41.183.130 Savvis
64.241.72.0/24 SAVVIS Communications Corporation
64.28.76.0/24 Savvis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 3:49 PM
To:
their servers that ought to be
counterweighted too.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:59 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Who is the real connecting server? (Headers vs
as
the connecting server (Yahoo). Shouldn't the abuse really be sent to Yahoo
since it come from their server (from our logs)?
Erik
EMAIL HEADERS:
Received: from smtp004.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.175.81] by
mail.montananetwork.net
Are you using Declude? If so, are you using Declude's Confirm
configuration? If so That is why you can't unsubscribe. There is a big
problem with Declude's Confirm. Disable the Confirm file and unsubscribe.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Funny you mention this I too I am not receiving them as near the date
you mentioned.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 4:30 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject
Does anyone know with the new directive WHITELIST LOCAL, if this should not
be used with WHITELIST AUTH? Or can the 2 be used together?
Erik
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe
Coming in though us too. Using FPROT, but appears now they've updated their
defs so they are being caught now.
They were non-encrypted ZIP's with different file names, single EXE in the
zip.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Title: Message
I'll
add our point too. We also are crashing with 2.0.6 (also SP1
installed). We've put back 1.82 into production. No
issues.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of scott_pownerSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 4:35
Agree. We also use the same as Scott. Imail's anti-spam is not used. Only
Declude, Sniffer and Invariant's URIBL.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:52 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Dan, we do the same thing. Our terms of service, privacy page and contracts
state that we reveal BCC's in the headers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 4:17 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
HELM is good for Windows, but lacks in Password Policies.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Oren
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 6:46 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Off Topic.
HostingAccelerator is
Title: Message
Me
either Declude has been pretty silent with a lack of communication in all
areas.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Darin CoxSent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:17
PMTo:
) for the time
being.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Shaffer
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 9:01 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]Log Question
Declude 2.0.5 iMail
I have an entry in $default$.junkmail
Title: Message
And
also:
If you
have the COPY ALL EMAIL active in Imail.. the DELETE action does does not
work. In our setup, we do not use any ROUTETO in any of our config
files. And you can not setup a per domain/user for that copy all email
account.
-Original
Is just my browser, or is Declude's clock on:
https://www.declude.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=5
Off? In CET (Central European Time) of 2:15AM, their clock shows 4:15AM EST
when it should be showing 9:15PM EST.
.hope this doesn't reflect in their 2.0 programming code. ;-)
---
[This E-mail
I can agree with you Fritz...
We too have had the same issues and in response to David Franco-Rocha
message, we DID submit to Declude support our problems with STILL no resolve
or further communication about it. [RNJ-98263]
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
It would be nice Declude would post this information instead of ignoring
requests or using not a priority as a result. The DELETE action is not
taking the action it should.
We too have reverted back to 1.82 as this version seems to be steady for us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
It is on our end too...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Che Vilnonis
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 5:24 PM
To: Declude Email List
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Is declude.com down?
anyone?
Che Vilnonis
Application Developer
Advertising
reaches it's intended source. Again, response from Declude was:
it's not a high priority.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:42 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail
I should confirm my post... By the catchall account, I'm referring to the
Copy All Mail enabled setting in IMAIL.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:04 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Since we did use the essential means of reporting this problem, we still
got back:
No. Declude Confirm hasn't been changed in a number of years, so it is not
currently a high priority.
-Scott
And:
As for Declude Confirm, I understand that it is a priority for you.
DNS? Or does DNS pull any MX it finds (no matter
the priority?)
Thanks,
Erik
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type
Windows HOSTS file until I can
find out what is going on.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 6:32 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail
to sender.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 7:04 PM
To: Erik
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Imail / DNS / and 2nd MX records
Sometimes, our DNS server wants to use their 2 MX record
The software used to do this in prior versions as well. My company has
asked me to look into other spam control because of the non-discloser of
such activity the software does behind doors; as it is a privacy issue
using our resources without consent; is how they put it to me. It sucks,
as I,
so, it's a privacy concern to our upper
management.
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 3:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude Phone's Home
I agree - I love
Right-click in the body of the HTML message and choose, View Source
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran Jovanovic
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 5:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Outlook HTML Question
Hi,
-Rich-Quick/Franchieses/Work-at-Home, etc.
Any thoughts or experiences?
Erik
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type
94 matches
Mail list logo
