Kami,
Very nice and thanks for sharing. We also use Tom's list - but I see how
this can really augment what we are doing with our declude from file
rules.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003
Kami,
If you don't mind sharing with me as well. We are trying to
tighten down and it is always great to gain perspective from someone in
the trenches. Off list email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your
time.
-Keith
-Original Message-
From: Don Schreiner [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks Kami, I'll look over those files.
On another note:
Awhile back someone mentioned addresses that change constantly like
x@list245 and x@list428, can the MAILFROM test be set up for this? for
example MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @list? I see the issue with that since most
subscribed lists start that
Yes..
Mailfrom contains will simply detect that address.
So if you set:
Mailfrom 0 Contains @list
You will catch x@list428, [EMAIL PROTECTED], etc.
So be careful..
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of paul
Sent: Wednesday, January
Scott,
Essentially all I am doing is acting as a gateway for another domain.
This way they can utilize the virus scanning and spam detection we have
in place.
What I am trying to implement is called Acting as a gateway for domains
on other servers in the manual. Now from the manual and what
You may want to add ten entries into your filter file like:
MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @list0
MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @list1
MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @list2
MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @list3
MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @list4
MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @list5
MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @list6
MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @list7
MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS
Hello,
I know this has been talked about in the past, I am just wondering where we
stand on the wish list of having a per domain whitelist?
I am not sure if has been mentioned but maybe to accomplish we would setup a
file like whitelist.cfg in the /declude/mail.example.com/ folder. If the
file
Now the manual says this under the Acting as a gateway for domains on
other servers heading - The only catch as far as Declude JunkMail is
concerned is that IMail will treat the E-mail to the gateway domain as
outgoing mail, since it is not stored on the IMail server. Therefore, by
default,
Essentially all I am doing is acting as a gateway for another domain.
This way they can utilize the virus scanning and spam detection we have
in place.
Ah, I see now. I had thought that you were acting as a backup mailserver
(in case they were down), rather than a gateway (to scan all their
I know this has been talked about in the past, I am just wondering where we
stand on the wish list of having a per domain whitelist?
It will be available in the next beta, due out sometime this week. :)
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Hi,
I'm sure this has been answered before...
How do I exclude one user from the spam filter?
If you could head me in the right direction, I'd appreciate it.
thanks, Andrew
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
John
Thanks for the follow-up. My confusion is in that Declude/Imail treat
the domain I am gatewaying for as outgoing mail. Now with per domain
settings it only references copying the $default$.JunkMail file to the
per domain folder. However, the outgoing tests are defined in the
global
Scott,
Things are starting to come together slowly now :)
Correct me if I am wrong.
Normally outgoing mail actions are specified in the Global.Config file.
However, when using per domain settings it only looks at the actions in
the $default$.JunkMail file for that domain.
Thanks
Darrell
Create a directory for the domain e.g. a directory called 'mydomain.com'
under the Declude directory. Copy $default$.junkmail into this folder.
You now have domain specific filters. For single users copy
$default$.junkmail to user.name.junkmail and edit accordingly.
e.g.
x:\imail\declude
You can also add a whitelist entry in the Global.cfg like:
WHITELIST TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
yes, thanks
andrew
- Original Message -
From: David Lewis-Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] single user exclusion
Create a directory for the domain e.g. a directory called 'mydomain.com'
under the
I'm sure this has been answered before...
How do I exclude one user from the spam filter?
If you could head me in the right direction, I'd appreciate it.
There are two ways to do this (both require Declude JunkMail Pro).
One is to set up a per-user configuration for that user
Normally outgoing mail actions are specified in the Global.Cfg file.
However, when using per domain settings it only looks at the actions in
the $default$.JunkMail file for that domain.
For a domain not hosted on the Imail server, yes. For a domain hosted on the
Imail server, it controls the
The headers below also came through. @uem-info.com is in my blacklist file.
Any ideas?
Sheldon
Received: from StarGazer.TenForward.com [65.161.10.3] by tenforward.com
(SMTPD32-7.13) id A2F84D620126; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 04:24:24 -0800
Received: from data.welchmedia.com (unknown [66.216.98.224])
The headers below also came through. @uem-info.com is in my blacklist file.
The important question here is what the return address is, since it doesn't
appear in the headers. Most likely, the return address is not
@uem-info.com, but instead something like @mailer1.uem-info.com.
You'll need
Isn't there an option now to be able to block an email if the blacklist info
is ANYWHERE in the header?
With Declude JunkMail Pro, you can use a filter such as:
HEADERS 3 CONTAINS@uem-info.com
(this would need to go in a file used by a file, not the global.cfg file).
The important question here is what the return address is, since it
doesn't
appear in the headers. Most likely, the return address is not
@uem-info.com, but instead something like @mailer1.uem-info.com.
You'll need to either use the XSENDER ON option to get the return address
to appear in
I'm going through some emails
that I've saved up that I've received and am in the process of adding them to my
black list. I found an email that was not scanned by Declude. I say this because
it doesn't have any of the Declude tags added to the header.
Here is what the header looks
like.
Declude JunkMail *always* uses the recipient to determine which
configuration file to use. Always.
So for domains hosted on the IMail server, you can't have outgoing
mail. Outgoing E-mail *from* locally hosted domains will use a
configuration file based on who they are sent to.
Thanks
I'm going through some emails that I've saved up that I've received and am
in the process of adding them to my black list. I found an email that was
not scanned by Declude. I say this because it doesn't have any of the
Declude tags added to the header.
Do your Declude JunkMail log file show
I will add that it is very useful to have in the Global.cfg file:
XSENDER ON
XSPOOLNAME ON
XINHEADER X-Tests-Failed: %TESTSFAILED%
Those three lines go a long way to helping to quickly know what is going on.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
John,
I do have those turned on. Here is what my INHeader looks like
CONSOLE OFF
XINHEADER X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by NFTISERV's Declude JunkMail for
spam.
XINHEADER X-Spam-Tests-Failed: %TESTSFAILED%
XINHEADER X-Weight: %WEIGHT%
#IPBYPASS 127.0.0.1
XSENDER ON
Scott,
No they do not.
Greg Foulks, MCP
NewFound Technologies, Inc.
http://www.nfti.com
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 614.318.5036
Fax: 614.318.5005
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:16
Now THERE'S an idea! I hadn't thought of that. Thanks Bill!
Paul
You may want to add ten entries into your filter file like:
MAILFROM 0 CONTAINS @list0
That way you will catch anything that starts with
I've had this happen several times, too, Greg. If you are inclined to
search the archives from two or three weeks ago, you will find a reply from
Scott regarding a terse error message the Declude log file; the upshot was
that if you look in your IMail and Declude logs, you will find this error
Ok, I just thought of another possible use. somebody STOP me! LOL
would the following work?
HEADERS 10 CONTAINS @xxxmail.com
when @xxxmail.com appears in the from line, NOT X-Declude sender? I've seen
quite a lot of this type, where you would like to say ok, block
@xxxmail.com. but the actual
My bad, I did not read your orginal post in its entirety.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
Do to 2 hardware failures and the fact I
am swamped with work, we are behind on the beta. It will be available soon.
Also, we are going to start working on
support for external tests through the interface. If you would like your
program configuration included in this, please let me
No they do not.
If there is nothing in the log files, most likely Declude didn't see the
E-mail at all. This should rarely ever happen, but could if for example
you were upgrading IMail at the time (if IMail overwrote the Declude
registry entry, and the E-mail arrived before Declude was
Ok, I just thought of another possible use. somebody STOP me! LOL
would the following work?
HEADERS 10 CONTAINS @xxxmail.com
when @xxxmail.com appears in the from line, NOT X-Declude sender? I've seen
quite a lot of this type, where you would like to say ok, block
@xxxmail.com. but the actual
I know this is off subject for this forum, but has anyone experienced any problems
posting to the Imail Forum list. I have posted several messages, but they have not
appeared and I haven't seen anything posted since yesterday around 6pm. Thanks for
the info.
Keith
+¨¥Á«,q©çy×è®ø«ºÇ¬o
Hey Scott- I do have gp1 and gp2 files. Should I send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Greg Foulks, MCP
NewFound Technologies, Inc.
http://www.nfti.com
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 614.318.5036
Fax: 614.318.5005
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Hey Scott- I do have gp1 and gp2 files. Should I send them to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Yes, that would be great.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
Title: Nachricht
We're
interested.
The
ini-file you should have already.
Today
we've seen some problem on SpamChk with negtive error-codes with the latest
releases (g, h, i and j)
Means:
SpamChk does not report negative return codes in this
versions.
Markus
-Original
I know this is off subject for this forum, but has anyone experienced any
problems posting to the Imail Forum list. I have posted several messages,
but they have not appeared and I haven't seen anything posted since
yesterday around 6pm. Thanks for the info.
I thought something wasn't
Title: Message
Hi;
Based on the
requests we received I decided to make these lists available hopefully we
can maintain them, at least on a weekly basis.
We hold on a
weight of 20.
Free emails: -
http://www.ClickandPledge.com/support/mail/freeemails.txt
these are the
services we have
I'm subscribed to the digest version and didn't receive yesterday's digest
either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, 15 January 2003 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Forum
Maybe it is quiet because everyones problems finally got solved. :-)
On a more serious note, semi off topic. I've got to upgrade an imail server
to version 7.X soon. What issues related to that upgrade and declude should
I look for? What is going to break with the upgrade?
It is using declude
On a more serious note, semi off topic. I've got to upgrade an imail server
to version 7.X soon. What issues related to that upgrade and declude should
I look for? What is going to break with the upgrade?
It is using declude junkmail and virus and also KVM templates.
Just to be safe, you
I'm a bit confused. Which one is the correct syntax?
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER
or
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER
Thanks,
Aaron
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
Each one is correct.
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER
This is probably what you want.
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER
This will catch those 3 words surrounded by quotation marks.
On filters, what you put there is what you get. If you put quotation
I'm a bit confused. Which one is the correct syntax?
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER
or
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER
That depends on what you are looking for. The first one will catch the
phrase if it is in the subject, whether or not
Hi;
They are both correct - depending on what you want to do.
Your text is what is being exactly matched. Text means whatever you have
including the quotation marks.
The first line will trigger if subject is You're the Winner You're a
Winner.
The second line only triggers for You're a Winner
I'm a bit confused. Which one is the correct syntax?
They both are. :-)
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER
This will filter on: You're a WINNER
SUBJECT 3 CONTAINSYou're a WINNER
This will filter on: You're a WINNER
(The filter is looking for the
Public thanks to everyone. My brain is feeling small today... so I had to
ask what could be perceived as a dumb question!
Thanks again, glad everyone here is so helpful!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Childers
Sent: Wednesday,
50 matches
Mail list logo
