If Declude is running the load will not change.
We found that declude with using 99% of the resources on our server.
We turned on Greylisting added SpamAssasin and turned off declude. Then took
the same server and created virtual servers on it. I now have an extra virtual
server I use for
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Douglas Cohn
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:50 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
F-prot is $50 for 10 licenses per year. $5 per machine per year. Version
6
Why is that not still reasonable?
Please
F-prot is $50 for 10 licenses per year. $5 per machine per year. Version 6
Why is that not still reasonable?
Please explain
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:33 PM
To:
Yes this is plain DUMB.
He should be shot IMO.
Declude should look at this as a way to get people off the list. More
people leave lists when things like this happen than at any other time.
Douglas Cohn
VP Engineering
Photogra, Inc.
www.photogra.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I like both options.
But killing him is also a good idea
Douglas Cohn
VP Engineering
Photogra, Inc.
www.photogra.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 6:01 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Isn't it better to just remove all the eml files so as to be more of the
solution and less of the problem.
It just seems that is all of us stopped sending eml's that millions of
useless messages would be stopped.
What am I missing? What value do these messages possibly have?
Doug
Hey stupid me but why not use a file transfer program for transferring files
and not worry about what you block in email. That is what FTP was invented
for anyway. If you have any type of Intranet or help desk system you should
have a place that allows users to both upload files and download
This is why I always wait for the bleeding edge people to suffer before I
touch anything. After all the bugs get worked out of it and then 4 or 5
weeks later I will install it.
But without you guys nothing would ever get going. So thanks.
Diug
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
19:02:06 -0400
Received: from UnknownHost [216.74.167.74] by mail.inetservers.com with
SMTP;
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:00:38 -0400
From: douglas cohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Test inetservers
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:00:32 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
positives if you weight things optimally.
Matt
Douglas Cohn wrote:
My desktop IP was erroneously listed on CBL. It seems that declude is
checking autheticated users sending mail for CBL and according to CBL this
is wrong. SEE below
Here is the header showing what went on with the actual Ips
Now to my final question and the reason all of this happened.
Imagine you work for developers that have an opted in mailing list with
close to a million email addresses. Valid opted in users. When someone
opts out they are removed. They can email opt out, they can even call the
office and opt
2005 18:34:59 -0400
From: douglas cohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Test cbl
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:34:52 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build
They always said it!!
Here's the previous update notice
We recommend that users of F-Prot Antivirus for Windows update their programs
to version 3.16b as soon as possible.
Please visit our update center to update your program
now:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Mcafee is a CPU HOG. Uses double the CPU of Fprot. I have a low powered
machine and cannot even run Mcafee but fprot is no problem. Both is unreal.
This is the mcafee command line scanner. The declude archive includes a
Wget updater that works fine. I use a 4NT update script but the Wget is
would recommend implementing
the 2.0.6.10 (or higher) incremental release; it does not run the routine to
reprocess email.
Declude Engineering
-- -Original Message-
-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus-
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
-- Sent: Tuesday, May 10
I have orphaned hdr files in my spool directory like this
C:\SmarterMail\Spool\62298363.~DR
Then I found this in proc
C:\SmarterMail\Spool\proc\62298363.EML
Has anyone else seen this?
Doug
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the
THANK YOU FOR THE Participation in the
forum!!!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph
KrausseSent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 9:11 AMTo:
Declude.Virus@declude.comSubject: [Declude.Virus]
ALLOWVULNERABILITIES Directive
We are currently
looking into a
This update is the worst method IMO (The one referenced in the link here).
I used to update every hour and using this I would find the machine with the
updater hung on the screen timed out at least once a week.
W2K Server SP4. What OS are you using it on where it does NOT create
issues?
I
would order a renewal. But he left.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 5:59 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Who is minding the store
Douglas Cohn wrote:
Using
Or even allowed on a list
What many lists I belong to help avoid this is disallow any reposting of the
footers. That way an automated process like this would never get through.
It requires the users posting, us, to cut off the footers manually but that
keeps the lists mean and lean. Initially I
What I find very odd is where is declude technical participation on this
list? Since Scott left I see no SOLID ANSWERS to many questions. Answers
that often came from Scott. I surely understand that there are many very
skilled programmers, technicians and network managers that are all
The only other difference is that I'm using SmarterMail.
That cause your Smarter. The difference between SmarterMail and Imail is
just unreal. It is like the difference between breathing and having a
plastic bag over your head. Imail always sucked but I lived with it because
I owned a copy
What is the current stable Declude version for IMAIL systems?
Is there still a version that allows manual updating of declude.exe? Of
course a legally licensed copy I refer to only.
Doug
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
I am confused.
I have recently found the Mcaffee command line scanner on several freeware
apps. Is it free? They claim everything on their site is 100% legit.
Additionally they even explain how to update it using the superdat.
Is it too old to be properly effective?? Not the signatures but
This may help
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-040.mspx
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob McGregor
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 1:06 PM
To: Declude-List
Subject: [Declude.Virus] What's the IFrame
OOOPs
Just got this.
FRISK Software has released version 3.16a of F Prot Antivirus for Windows.
More information on this release can be found on our
website:
http://www.f-prot.com/news/gen_news/041124_release_win316a.html
We recommend that users of F-Prot Antivirus for Windows update their
F-prot seems to work fine for on-demand for me but I do not have any have
excel and word uploaded files.
I figured since I had to buy a 10 machine license might as well make some
use out of it. There is still an issue with the auto updater occassionally
timing out though so I use batch files to
Ignore my previous post about F-prot on your server. It will not suffice if
you need to exclude certain folders from being scanned as I have found no
method that allows that yet.
As you know it is lightweight cannot be optimized to ignore specific
folders. For servers that are not accessed by
I believe the updater is just very poorly written because I see this happen
all the time on brand new systems that run XP SP2, W2k SP4, etc etc. With
and without KVM's.
The solution unlunkily is to use one of the batch files. I believe they
simply do not have enough bandwidth at F-prot and the
These are not maintenance fees but cross grade.
It's only 10 TIMES the cost of the current renewal for an Unlimited version
of Imail.
HAHAHAHA
We are dumping IMAIL within the next year. It is mopre than Exchange as far
as I'm concerned. About triple the price for small in house corporate
seconds.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Cohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 7:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Updater timing out?
I believe the updater is just very poorly written because I see this happen
all the time on brand
Plugs into Declude Virus???
How does it do that or was this intended for the Declude JunkMail list not
the Virus list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 6:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been using Viruscode 8 for more than 6 months and have not received
even 1 false positive,
But my users are not a very large group and they most likely do not send a
lot of attachments via email. I have taught them how to transfer files
actually via ftp.
DC
-Original Message-
I personally do not like installing anything on my Imail servers. That said
I use a sinple dos batch file to delete everything that is X days old. I run
it as a scheduled task daily.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Rogers
Douglas Cohn wrote:
I personally do not like installing anything on my Imail servers. That
said I use a sinple dos batch file to delete everything that is X days
old. I run it as a scheduled task daily.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
I have F-prot marking my Thunderbird mail program files as
JS.Downloader.Trojan. Symantec Corp 8.0 sees nothing suspicious about the
files.
Then today F-prot looked in some static Office 2000 files and determined
that
AGENTANM.DLL
AGENTCTL.DLL
AGENTDP2.DLL
AGENTDPV.DLL
AGENTMPX.DLL
AGENTPSH.DLL
You can run a scheduled task that deletes the contents of the virus folder
every x minutes, hours, days.
DC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Carter
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Title: Message
I am sorry. I misunderstood Graphic/text. I now
see the graphic is the ARROW which I never attempted to click at
all.
So when I said it works for me I was referring to the Text
which for some dumb reason I took as graphic. (yes it's text).
Both arrows definitely link to
Now that 1.81 is released what is the recommendation by
DECLUDE (SCOTT) regarding the config file.??
IE do we allow the AV software to scan jpegs by removing
the line
SKIPEXT
JPG
or do we allow Declude to take care of it completely
.
From what I understand (and I know ugotz) the
rather than overwriting the declude.exe file in the imail root directory
when you unzip the file.
Jim Matuska Jr.
Computer Tech II
CCNA
Nez Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Cohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
I have used it on client machines for the past 6 months and also find it
equal to Norton Corp except for one thing. It handles mail clients
differently in that it does not scan email as they come in but instead seems
to scan it only when you attempt to read it.
Norton Corp seemed to catch the
It may be worth your time to contact Yahoo and alert them of this if it is
really an issue. If they give a hoot (and they very well may) they will put
some text on the page to use the Url and not the filename when sending links
of maps in email.
Doesn't Yahoo have a link for sending a map to
That is the correct price for that LICENSE LEVEL (L) VCLCAE-AA-LH
But you must be GOVERNMENT and I believe that price is for 10,000+ copies.
License Pricing IDIQ:Level L,Volume:,Government:
McAfee VirusScan Command Line Scanner Standard - complete package
Specifications
General
Compatibility
Message -
From: Douglas Cohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 4:58 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 3.15 w/Declude
This is the command we run from task manager and have for some time with
no
issues.
C:\Program Files\FSI\F-Prot\FP-Updater
to the
console.
Is there a good reason not to do it this way??
~Joe
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Cohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 3.15 w/Declude
I have been doing that exact thing for months
: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 3.15 w/Declude
I don't log out of the email server. I simply lock the console. The Updater
will still run and the system still requires a password to get back to the
console.
Is there a good reason not to do it this way??
~Joe
- Original Message -
From: Douglas
http://www.microsoft.com/security/incident/download_ject.mspx
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest attack
UNTIL NOW??
You are infected now?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest attack
reported by CNN?
OT-
http://www.microsoft.com/security/incident/download_ject.mspx
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] OT- Anyone know about this latest
Thanks
Had a feeling when I pasted it but it was too late already. Must have added
it when I changed it to fpcmd.
Thanks I removed it just now.
DC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 8:02 AM
I am having some odd reports from Virusloganalyser lately.
It no longer shows I have any viruses just Outlook Vulnerabilities..
Previously, I believe when I was running the 16 bit Fprot (now running 32
bit) it reported viruses.
Here is a snippet of my logs. I also do not understand the missing
Have you sent those caught viruses to the declude or F-prot virus traps?
They may be corrupted and not viable viruses any longer. Meaning they are
no longer harmful (Possibly).
F-prot would surely want to see this. Go to their website and submit the
samples.
Doug
-Original Message-
Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] BSOD and IMail-Server reboot
discussion concerning Intel OB NICs and Imail.
Search the archives.
Bottom line, get a solid Server designated NIC.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
Sent: Friday, June
This problem has not gone away. It occurs with very high traffic only and
is not related to declude. That is we tested iot without declude and it
still Blue Screens when there is extremely high traffic.
Imail claims that when the server has extremely high traffic you need to use
a SERVER NIC in
Uuencode/Uudecode is what we used to use before the high speed world became
a reality.
You would type Uudecode and the file name and path. If I remember as long
as all the parts where in the same directory it would reassemble it. There
are plenty of mailers that will reassemble and I really
Actually why couldn't Declude run uudecode and reassemble the file before
hand, then have it scanned and determine if it is harmful or not??
DC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 5:41 PM
To: [EMAIL
but it requires 2 IP addresses
to work. Is that what you have done or are you running one on a non standard
port?
Thanx
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Cohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 12:28:22
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Notification for forwarded messages
We
We do this as well using Vbscript only. It does exactly what you do.
Anytime a virus is quarantined an email with a link to the file is sent to
the recepient with a warning of the dangers involved in retrieving the
files. We then delete everything over 5 days old to avoid getting too many
files
What is the link to the manual again. I misplaced it.
And what is the most current Beta and where can I obtain. Most current
interim?
Sorry bout this
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:05 PM
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Good list of SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEHAS
What is the link to the manual again. I misplaced it.
And what is the most current Beta and where can I obtain. Most current
interim?
Sorry
Why do you want to know the IP?
Do you have a router on the network? Or a switch that you can manage. If
you have any Cisco hardware on the network you can easily determine the IP
from an arp address. If it is a small network just
show ip arp
Or
show ip arp xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Will give all
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 1:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] TOT TCP/IP Protocol driver service
I also have the 2002 Admin pack. Back then we paid
I also have the 2002 Admin pack. Back then we paid $999 for it.
I have saved several shared servers with it more than covering the $999 but
now it is closer to $5000 I believe.
It may be worth it as well.
All their products are great. Go to the freeware site sysinternals.com and
get all their
Thanks
I was thinking about adding the rule as well but also
assumed that any legit mail to yahoo would be blocked and stopped
myself.
Too bad the powers that be here are not buying JUNK
Mail.
DC
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MattSent: Tuesday, May 11,
I love decludeJunkmail as I have it on my
personal domain on a sharedmail serverthat an ISP friend/client
allows me to use.
I must now use a local spam product on my personal mail and
everyone else fends for themselves on the company domain which works for some
but it is still local
I have seen this as well.
You could write a batch file that tests for the website first and if it
resolves correctly runs the updater. If not it loops through and delays 10
minutes and then tries again.
I have been planning to do just that myself.
I run the updates every hour so I am more
Help me out please.
Why are we looking for the beginning of an IP address? Also my
understanding of these filters is to eliminate sending emails to users that
were not the original senders because of a forged virus. Is that correct???
If so wouldn't adding the Virus name to the declude forged
HUH???
The latest released version is 1.75; the latest beta is 1.75.
You meant Beta is 1.79 correct???
Also what happened to that emergency list you created. I joined it or tried
to but was never confirmed.
DC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] .CPL file blocked
Douglas,
Can I ask why you block MS Access files (MDB) and not other Office products
that can contain macros?
John Olden - Systems Administrator
Champaign Park District
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Cohn [EMAIL
Contact Microsoft. They can analyze the dumps for you. 64K dumps should be
fine.
DC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Hahn
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Mcafee NetShield
Why the interest in the second power supply??? Is it used or just laying in
wait for the first one to die as in 99% of the RDP systems currently in
production?
Don't get me wrong. You should always have at least one spare power supply
handy and if money is not an issue or the server is critical
This is the most recent list I was given. (from this list). It has a few more than
Johns.
BANEXT ad
BANEXT adp
BANEXT asp
BANEXT bas
BANEXT bat
BANEXT CEO
BANEXT chm
BANEXT cmd
BANEXT com
BANEXT cpl
We have also used Norton Corporate for at least 3 - 4 years now with no
problems.
I remember a few years back when we had a mess in our network (In 1999 fast
growing pains) and a dedicated customer installed Norton and we had
installed it for our shared. We saw his Norton in the Server MMC
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 11:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MAXATONCE Switch
Scott
Why does your sample F-prot command line use the 16 bit scanner instead of
the 32 bit one?
Do you
I am also using /SERVER and /ARCHIVE=5
I have no idea if it is doing anything worthwhile but it
has not created any false positives so I leave it in. I actually got the
config from users on this list.
I am being cautious regarding Viruscode 8 and excel and
word files. So far so good.
Scott
Why does your sample F-prot command line use the 16 bit scanner instead of
the 32 bit one?
Do you have a recommended command line for FPcmd and do you recommend that
we always use it instead of F-prot.exe. I have not patched my Imail server
with the current Microsft patches because I am
version :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 11:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MAXATONCE Switch
Scott
Why does your sample F-prot command line use the 16 bit scanner instead
On this same subject.
If you are using Fprot and have configured it exactly as you recommend on
the WEBSITE will an Excel file with a dangerous Macro be detected?
IE is there a middle ground with FPROT? I currently have /SERVER in my
commandline and Viruscode 8 in my config (see below) because
Is there any thought about changing this? IE removing the attachment and
passing the email through.
Or is the case I gave very rare?? IE a legitimate email with the
Quarantined Attachment.txt. And if not blocked it will come through, I am
aware as I do not block them.
Why add Quarantined
Can anyone tell me what this means. I included the later lines as well.
Running Declude standard Diagnostics ON (Declude v1.78i27). Fprot 3.14e with
this command line
SCANFILEC:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\F-Prot.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM
/ARCHIVE=5 /NOFLOPPY /NOBOOT /DUMB /SERVER
Thanks for the immediate reply G
Will it treat the message like a virus. IE not forward it to the recipient?
Love your company and product. You should start a consulting company and
teach corporations how to treat customers.
DC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree with your customer. Why do you ban all zip files? How are they expected to
conduct business if their business requires transferring files? My customers required
that I create a way for them to retrieve the infected files for them.
You could simply do that. Allow the customer to
I have been following the recent threads but I have not seen a definitive
answer. Most likely because it is still so new (F-prot 3.14E). Some help
would be greatly appreciated.
What about the /SERVER setting? Any advantage to using it.
I am also a bit confused about the Viruscode settings.
I
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot 3.14e
Being new to Declude/F-prot I was testing an install. Running W2K I updated
F-Prot from 3.14C to 3.14E and restarted everything
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-prot 3.14e
Being new to Declude/F-prot I was testing an install. Running W2K I updated
F-Prot from 3.14C to 3.14E and restarted everything
Being new to Declude/F-prot I was testing an install. Running W2K I updated
F-Prot from 3.14C to 3.14E and restarted everything without rebooting.
Seems to be working fine on my desktop.
Is this safe on my mail server as well? I am not very comfortable rebooting
that often.
Thanks
DC
Are there any sample configs around to get some ideas on what works well.
I just setup Declude AV and it worked right out of the box. Nice feeling.
Thanks for the great product.
Doug
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude
I read that there are two products capable of this. Aladdin and Network Box
or something like that.
http://www.ealaddin.com/news/2004/esafe/Bagel_virus.asp and another
http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2004/Mar/1024780.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
89 matches
Mail list logo
