James
This may be obvios but why don't you iterate thru the array using chr()
to compile your string or use a stream
s := ''
for i := 10 to 40 do
s := s+chr(array[i]);
- Original Message -
From: James Sugrue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul
Sorry I wasn't quite clear I meant @@Identity
ie
If the statement fires one or more triggers that perform inserts that
generate identity values, calling @@IDENTITY immediately after the statement
returns the last identity value generated by the triggers.
And as I understand it is only
Paul
But your second point does concern me. Basically you're saying that under
stress and with multiple connections, an identity column may return the
same
value twice. Can you point me to a link that confirms that? I understood
they were pretty much bullet proof.
Unfortunately not - I
Stephen
think about it last night why do you
1/ Code the 'generator' using a global table with an identity column
ie
create proc GetID as
begin
declare @NewID int
insert into GenTable (InUse) values ('Y')
set @NewID = @@identitiy
return @NewID
end
then call this outside your
quick way out :(
I will continue to mull this over.
Thanks for all the input
Stephen
-Original Message-----
From: Neven MacEwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 12 January 2001 9:54 a.m.
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject: Re: [DUG]: [DUG-DB]: Unique IDs
Steph
Nic
Yes, So you had the cascaded insert problem, I was more worried about
connection sharing and
not using batches
Neven
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website:
Stephen
Is this using MDAC 2.6 'cause I think its a known bug
(there is a fix out for it) or you could go back to 2.5
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Bertram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 January 2001 09:56
:44
Subject: RE: [DUG]: ADO
Thanks Neven
Can you point me to where I can find the fix or any other info?
Stephen
-Original Message-
From: Neven MacEwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 11 January 2001 10:48 a.m.
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject: Re: [DUG
Stephen
Code your own 'generator' as a stored proc using a UniqueIdentifier (GUID)
datatype
and the NEWID() function
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Bertram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 January 2001 15:31
Stephen
I assume that one of the advantages of NewID() is that it is fast (or should
be)
So you could use NewID() to generate the ID and then just use the
top 4 bytes (these are sequential) in your stored proc
(in SQL2000 can a user defined procedure be called as a default?)
ie Create Table test
Re
The problem is :
Process 1 generates 11
Process 2 generates 12
Process 3 generates 13
Process 1 issues a rollback - ID 11 is now unused
Process 4 generates 11 - based on rolledback seed value.
Process 5 generates 12 !! Duplicate
Process 6 generates 13 !! Duplicate
more like
Paul
The two probs with "identity columns" are
a/ They are only unique to a connection and
b/ They are only held for the last action (ie if your insert fires a trigger
and the trigger insert and idenity)
you are stuffed
PS
Did I note that Gary had posted this discussion to DUG tut tut
Matt
Rather than trad MDI - I use a panel on the main form with child forms
and a tree navigator to make them visible (sort of like outlook)
After all who ever wants to Cascade or Tile MDI app
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Comb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of
Nic
Re swing
- its
100% java - it uses (pretty much) 3 functions of the OS:
draw pixel
draw line
display text
This is the main advantage C# will have over Java, M$ will tout it as
portable whilst highly
targeting it to the Windows Graphics Model, they are never inconvenienced by
actually
Nic
Re C#
problem is, it aint portable if you can't _actually_ run it on other
platforms.
Define Run! - It would be to much of a risk for M$ to make C# Windows Only
(would be like arming the DOJ) but you can bet that they will be spending
as much effort making .NET run nicely on their
Is .Net an application or an operating system?
Is a JVM a application or an OS? Consider this the App/OS distinction
was easy when all apps and OS were distinct (2 tier so to speak)
But in these days where OS are becoming more complex (complete?)
it is hard to say - it's an n-tier world out
Martin
"Are they trying to sucker us to C++ so we miss the VB - C# Stampede?"
You probably missed the intended sarcasm in that remark.
One of the "features" of C# is platform independence with M$ recent history
on
this topic (the J++ windowising) would you trust these people.
Delphi/Kylix is
Max
As always a clear head - Delphi is at such a critical mass now that
it would probably survive (a la Lazarus?)
and it not like your've gone out and tatooed "Borland Rule OK" on your
forheads have you?
No..but I was considering a Penguin
Neven
Mark
John (also known as Man in Black - serious linux guru - looking over my
shoulder)
quipped that you have to change the default run level
from 5 to 3 (in the /etc/inittab file)
HTH
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list
Corey
I figure it's more likely that they simply ripped the whole VCL source and
started changing it to work with their compiler platform. That is,
after
all, the Linux Way.
This is a little cruel, inaccurate and bigoted
Neven
Corey
I hope you're not going to accuse me of being a linux hater.
No That would be an assumption.
However "Open Source" does not mean violate others rights to license their
software how they choose.
I don't see that simply because the VCL has a partially open source you
would rip it off
Also
Hi Guys
Felt I had to comment on this one (the delay has been due to being offline
as my father died on the 19th of Dec)
- Why use D4?
- Stored Proc debugging? only on MS SQL I assume
- ADOExpress evens the database access score
- They hammer the BDE even after Borland have said it's "end of
Willie
Three things
1/ My Name is Neven
2/
In my limited circle of developer friends I know of 2 (probably 3
actually -
none of which are called Nevan or Nic) that have worked with both and
they
all prefer IB after their experiences.
This is totally heresay, when you have some knowledge
Sandeep
Yes you could use pessimistic locking however I wouldn't suggest it.
especially not
in the application.
As i have said before I you'd be better off accepting that SQL servers are
not ISAM's
and embrace the changes it will require, not fight them
"To the man with a hammer all the world
Carl
I'm enjoying this thread. :-)
It was getting a bit quiet there for a while
I used to say "an SQL language stands or falls on the strength of it's
optimiser". But since Interbase's optimiser is a steaming heap of dung,
but I'm confused..what part of IB did you enjoy? :-)
I do think
Cory
If you are any way suggesting I'm an braindead M$ sycophant then you
Whoa, chill Neven. He was (as he pointed out) stating his opinion of
MSSQL,
NOT slamming you. Calm down and read the message again.
You'll note I did say IF
Neven
Myles
(Only your data - we have had about 6 MS SQL7 DB corruptions since
starting
using MS SQL7 last year ...
Thankfully they were only development DB's.
Maybe i'm blessed but I've only ever had one (and that was because I hadn't
loaded sp1)
Neven
Mark
instead of DocEntryDestCB.ItemIndex :=
DocEntryDestCB.Items.IndexOf(ImpDestCode);
for a csDropDown you can
DocEntryDestCB.Text := ImpDestCode;
a csDropDown doesn't enforce existance of the item
- Original Message -
From: Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of
Carl
isn't postgreSQL *nix only?
see http://www.postgresql.org/docs/admin/supported-platforms.htm
Neven
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website:
Carl
Read the bottom
- Original Message -
From: Carl Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 December 2000 15:29
Subject: RE: [DUG]: Interbase
isn't postgreSQL *nix only?
see
going to be released
on
Linux? Probably never
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Neven MacEwan
Sent: Saturday, 16 December 2000 17:14
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject: Re: [DUG]
Nic
Fun next week getting our
first 1Gig Athalon
your actually _buying_ one? Personally, I wouldn't bother - you'll be
running windows 2000 or nt on it, right? so get a dual CPU machine
instead -
a dual 700 should outperform a 1gig in _most_ multi-tasking situations,
without the ability
Patrick
BUT... MS-SQL doesn't support triggers as well as Interbase...
You don't think nesting and recursion are good? Or are you just so stuck on
the before and after
trigger paradigm that anything else is not as good?
Lets list a few things interbase can't do
1/ Replication
2/ CASE,
Nic
Good to see you working on the weekend - hah
well, can you do "proper" cascade deletes? ie, delete from the master
table,
remove the children automatically?
Declaritively not in 6.5 but in 2000 yes - but I use triggers to enforce RI
anyway so yes
2/ CASE, COALESCE and NULLIF (also
Mark
Last time I tried installed MSDE I -had- to install Access 2000 first,
that doesn't seem much of a small footprint to me..
Don't see why? you prob just need MDAC
Re PostgreSQL returning a result set I've heard of some sort cludgey
solutions
(which I'll track down) but I think it is the
Patrick Re
Don't rush to learn Postgre, it has a more limited implementation than
MySQL
(for example, doesn't support INNER JOIN :(
The only reason I'm using it is because it's the database that my ISP
chose
to install.
Spit..splutter..cough..choke
PostgreSQL may not have full join syntax
Sandeep
You don't, SQL Servers have no exposed concept of a lock
If you want the easiest port from an ISAM to SQL I'd recommend you
use ADOExpress (tho i've never used it with IB). ADO would give you
your filters and locates and then the only change you would have to add
would
be confict
Sandeep
It is possible to lock a record using FIB TDataset.
Table.LockRecord is used to lock a record. When the LockRecord
function is called an update query is executed.
And what does this 'update query' do? All I was stating was that SQL
does not expose the concept of record locking
Pat
Maybe true...but both of them seem to be a long way behind Interbase.
Interbase is a fine database but way behind Oracle and MS SQL
Did I get the impression somewhere that GENERATOR is part of the SQL-92
standard and only Interbase supports it.
And I thought the whole SQL-92 standard
Nic (if you're awake)
although I was
interested in the lack of a bidirectional cursor for the queries - Nic -
any chance you could explain what was happening there? I assume dbExpress
is designed differently...
Could you please elucidate
Neven
Chrissy
Also select a group of comps and right click to get the 'Align' menu
you can then align to the first item selected (Visio on the other hand
aligns to the last item selected - VC)
HTH
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Chrissy R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list
]: Component Draging
That is not what I was talking about - I simply want to see the outline
of the component when I drag it and did not what to change every
display property until I found the right one.
Chrissy.
- Original Message -
From: Neven MacEwan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple
Dave
We could ignore your posts.
I would think we should ignore his posts! This list is
dedicated to the ongoing use and development of delphi
and support of immoral prirates.
Neven
---
New Zealand Delphi Users
C'mon Nello - we couldn't exclude you (just post a proof of purchase!)
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Nello Sestini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2000 12:56
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Compile 16bit applications
keep using that memory until some other event - if so, when would that
be - reboot/shutdown/next Delphi app started ? I'm aware this is not a
nice way of doing things, but just wondered the official reason.
Cheers,
Kurt.
Neven MacEwan wrote:
Chrissy
Just a few basics
1
Hi guys
Had a thought about this
I woder if there is a syntax for this
TsqlObject = class (TsqlPersistentObject)
private
MainEntTable: TsqlTable
DetailEntTable: TsqlTable relatedby MainEntTable.PK = DetailEntTable.FK
public
attribute: string read MainEntTable.Column
published
Joel
nil if you want to - You would normal pass the Instance that the event
applied to
ie Form3.ListBox1Click(ListBox1) but if you don't make reference to the
sender then nil is fine
If you use the same proc for several list boxes then you pass the listbox as
sender - make sense
Neven
-
Stephen
I've normally kept a list of components created on the fly and
specifically
freed them - maybe I don't need to.
Depends on wether you pass and owner to the constructor or not,
Some people use Create(nil) in which case you clean up yourself or
Create(Form1) in which case the form
Chrissy
Just a few basics
1/ In Delphi you almost never have to use pointers and new() is really for
non-object use
2/ A TComponent derived class can own other TComponents (which may own
other...) See TComponent.Components array TComponent.ComponentCount
(simarly TWinControl implement
Joel
For Windows you really can't beat the old ini file format
For Linux gnome have a new Config file Library that is worth a look
HTH
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Joel van Velden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 27,
David
Re
I'm also not sold on triggers. Maybe I've just never seen a good
implementation, but in my experience they tend to cause performance
problems
and are vastly more difficult to debug than stored procedures. One of
their
biggest benefits is consistency of updates
True, Triggers are
Paul
The fact that
they operate on the same tables is not in itself an indication that the
"wheels have fallen off" - IMHO of course.
You'll note that I said 'loose' not 'fall off'! Essentially you are
embedding data integrity logic in
two places - which opens the door to inconsistency.
It
Paul
It is clear I am looking at this from a different perspective to you, and
as
such these generalisations aren't going to achieve much. I'll therefore
leave you to it.
Fun tho aint it :-)
Neven
---
New
Paul
And stored procedures as normal standard methods. I agree.
Updating via stored procs (without triggers) is then
analagous to writing delphi progs only using RTTI
I withdraw the RTTI Comment - I was being too flippant
The analogy of SP as methods is quite valid if you abstract out a
Myles
If ADO Supports this (if only for MS SQL and Access) is this
part of the ADO Provider Spec (ie could other OLE DB Providers support this)
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Myles Penlington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 27
Re
This approach seems to becoming increasingly common and is one which we
are
also taking. It works very well for updates and allows you to do very nice
things (such as update stored procs which update multiple tables, create
an
audit trail, check the validity of the change, not to mention
Pat
TMS TPlanner is cheap $50 USD (if not good) I'm using it now (with DB
Enhancement for a Timesheet)
However I'd be interested to see what Jeremy Coulter has produced (taunt
taunt)
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Pat Sheehan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Sandeep
If you are saying that the fact that the platform must have the JVM then by
your
definition 'platform independance' cannot exist. Unless you use the Henry
Ford/Microsoft version
which is 'it runs on all plarforms as long as they are Windows (TM)'
Neven
- Original Message -
Alan
Then dont bother using RDSconnection (it is only useful if you want a middle
layer)
Just use an ADOConnection and a ClientSide dataset
HTH
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Alan Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 21
Hi All
Since the list police seem to be all asleep and lively discussion is the
order of the day then
give the spec of a clients requirement for a database (sql) app (and
ignoring middleware requirements)
would you on the client side use
1/ Delphi/Kylix (and limit your target clients to
Sandeep
You mean to say if I just copy the byte codes to target machine it
will know what to do.
I'm a little confused what 'byte codes' for which 'target machine'
Neven
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group -
Nic
I was confused by Sandeep comments not by the concept of 'Byte Codes' and
'Target Machines'
re
Java compiles to a virtual CPU (call it JCPU) -
Delphi compiles to a real one (intel IA32).
Not quite correct Java compiles to a Virtual Machine, Delphi compiles to an
Intel CPU and a series
So do you want to 'pass thru' the middle tier in this case?
Its prob not a problem with ADOExpress per se what you prob
need to do is access properties of the ResordSet directly
I'll do some research and get back
Neven
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple
Nic
What does the app do?!
GUI Database App ie a booking system etc
I'd not touch 2 with a 50 foot barge pole.
Now this is interesting the 'Java Man' bagging Java
Can you eludidate as to why?
Neven
---
New
Nic
Nope, Delphi compiles to a set of Intel CPU byte codes. The windows API
has
_nothing_ to do it with, except for the format of the EXE and the
occasional
JMP or CALL statement to strange and far off places.
you lost the argument when you said 'except' though you could have got me by
Nic
Thanks for that, based on this maybe I should thow in another option
4/ Kylix frontend running on a Gnome Desktop on Linux App Server x-client
using VNC xserver and VNC clients
has the following
1/ Portable to any client that VNC Supports
2/ Client is Thin (less than 1mb)
3/ Less noisy
Nic
Or a standard Delphi app running on NT Terminal Server. Same result. And I
think they have a Linux client (there is a Java one, anyway), and ICA does
ones for most other platforms.
Difference is that Terminal Services is a kludge, x isn't
3/ Less noisy than X
Lower Bandwidth
Sandeep
And it is not to be forgotten that VB was designed by same person
who designed Delphi.
Huh? To say VB was 'designed' is a stretch. Poor Mr Wurth I hope he is dead
rather
than hear this
Neven
---
New Zealand
Bevan
Interbase or ADO (I won't use ADO simply 'cos it's M$).
Good to see a bit of late afternoon bigotry
Interbase is prob a good choice when it brings out replication (though that
wont be free)
MS SQL Supports 'merge replication' though it is not free either but they
are probably the best
ADO's data shaping is LOTS of fun. Had aplay when it first came out (even
did some training with it). Its nice, and worth a look, IMO - tho I think
you need MSSQL 7 to get it...
Don't think so (tho I was wrong once.14th Feb 1974) Think is ships with
MDAC and is prob in 2000 (Someone can
Dave
Is this and ADO ClientDataSet?
If so there is an informal fix out for this - the closing the cloned
record/dataset caused the original to close
BTW this is how TADODataset implements 'locate'
HTH
Neven
- Original Message -
From: David Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple
Chrissy
I'll accept a bit of humour - but flirtatious behaviour is out
(unless it's directed at me!)
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Chrissy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2000 16:51
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Is Everyone
Myles
Almost makes ADO attractive. I was hoping that the new D6
(DBExpress) was going to be the panacea
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Myles Penlington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2000 17:23
Subject: RE:
Myles
I will be more thoughtful about my ADO Gripes!
try this for a Editable/Live dataset
SELECT
a.TMTimeSheetEntryID,
a.Notes, a.HRStaffID, a.JSJobID, a.ARAccountID, a.TMOverheadID,
a.Started, a.Finished, a.Chargeable, a.Booking,
COALESCE(b.Name, c.Description, d.WorkRequested) as
Myles
I understand the mechanisms - I just don't understand why the it says it is
'finished' (probably even fires an event to
say as such) and the object appears to continue changing asynchronously is
it (choose from the list)
1/ M$ Crap Coding
2/ M$ Crap Specification
3/ M$ Crap Documentation
D,
I some times think with ADO (and COM for that matter) in VCL type wrappers
there
are strange timing issues. I have a db panel component that builds its
editor on Active LayoutChanged and
Close then Open of the ADODataSet caused all sorts of strange behaviour
(like TFields transmogrifying mid
Juan
This should be
constructor TSpIterator.Create(InitCount: Integer);
begin
inherited Create;
if ( InitCount 0 ) then
try
Reset(InitCount);
except
on E: EOutOfMemory do
MessageDlg(E.Message, mtError, [mbOk], 0);
end
end;
(not sure of the effect of
Sandeep
What Web Server? - For NT Delphi is prob as good as anything
But if it's relatively simple have you considered PHP, Also look at ZOPE
HTH
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Sandeep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 13
Tony
Yes - you can overload constructors - I use it all the time - Look at
TObjectList
Creates and initializes a TObjectList.
constructor Create; overload;
constructor Create(AOwnsObjects: Boolean); overload;
Description
Create creates a TObjectList instance. If no parameter is specified, or
Nello
Firstly Tables are braindread - In fact in ADO a Table type command simply
inserts 'select * from' in front of the table name.
They have no place in an SQL based CS solution - they were an archaism
perpetuated for those diehard
ISAM programmers,
Use exclusively TQuery type components
Leigh
Q
1/ Is this a one off or a synch process
2/ Do you want it to be generic i.e from any of (Interbase, MS SQL 7.0,
Oracle) to any of (Interbase, MS SQL 7.0, Oracle)
3/ Are you over-writing or appending
- Original Message -
From: Leigh Wanstead [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple
-
From: "Neven MacEwan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Multiple recipients of list delphi" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Best way to copy data from one database to another
database using ADO
Leigh
Q
1/ Is this a one off or a s
Leigh
Blobs are going to be a problem and so is RI (esp self referencing)
If you use ADO you can still use the logic I outlined
1/ Drop Target tables if they exist*
2/ Create Target Tables without RI, PK, Triggers or Indexes*
3/ Use ADO (Cantu type algorithm) to copy in data
4/ Create PK's,
Mark
As an aside There was something on delphi direct about passing strings as
Const
it being far more efficient. But as a matter of style I use local funcs and
procs to
stop the main routine suffering indentititus can't be that ineff to call
(esp with no param) can it?
Wouldn't be surprised if
Nick
dataaware is a nightmare with C/S databases - avoid it like the plague. IT
does work tho, its just not that quick. If you switch from paradox, you
_have_ to get out of the locate/findkey/next/prev etc mentality REALLY
quickly.
I must say that with ADO Client Datasets in BatchUpdate
Moises
I think from memory the TADOQuery component hides CommandTimeout
so you have to use TADODataSet. If you look at the imp of a TADOQuery all it
really does is change the property CommandText to SQL
HTH
- Original Message -
From: Moises Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple
Mark
Any clues? (database, connection method etc)
Neven
- Original Message -
From: Mark Derricutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2000 14:11
Subject: [DUG]: Previous record in dataset...
Hiya, is there anyone to
recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 2 November 2000 14:50
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Previous record in dataset...
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Neven MacEwan wrote:
Any clues? (database, connection method etc)
Ewps, was hoping for a generic dataset method :P Its a memory table from
recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 29 October 2000 18:23
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Access to Standard Input in a non console app
Neven MacEwan wrote:
Cory
Found two interesting functions -- AllocConsole and FreeConsole on
Delphi3000
http://www.delphi3000.com/article.asp?id=568
PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2000 19:13
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Access to Standard Input in a non console app
Neven MacEwan wrote:
Nello
Thanks - but why can't a graphical app take standard input?
It's the way windows works. Under
security issues
related to this - for example the console app could
be running on a different box under different
authentication blah blah blah ...
If you're interested and can't find it give a shout
back and i'll see if i can find it again.
-ns
-Original Message-
From: Neven MacEwan
From: Patrick Dunford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you mean address book or contacts in outlook
Both ideally
Neven
---
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website:
J,
I've lost my msdos progrmmers manual but there was a BDOS call which did a
soft boot
have a look around the archives we found a boot.exe which rebooted (an more)
Hey do you remember cpm where the fist thing you did was make a zero length
executable called @.com?
Loading @ put you back in
Hi all
Does anyone have any example code on how to get access to the
outlook/express address book?
TIA
Regards Neven
N.K. MacEwan B.E. EE
Ph 649 574 0027
Fax 649 570 2706
"A truth denied the light of action will wither to a promise, propaganda and
then a lie"
J
I remember now - the prog we found booted the pc at a predetermined time
A quick net-trawl could save you re-inventing the wheel
Neven
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2000 02:58
Subject:
Hi All
Is there any way that a graphical app can read standard input? I want to
write an app write uses redmon to direct
Postsciprt output to a fax server (on linux)
TIA
Regards Neven
N.K. MacEwan B.E. EE
Ph 649 574 0027
Fax 649 570 2706
"A truth denied the light of action will wither to a
Nello
My project started as modal forms and therefore 'embedding' them seemed to
be the way to go
I've played with frames as well and am wary of porting the whole project to
frames after Alans comments
(Also I read a 'subtext' that frames were there for reusability and tho they
support
change. Hope this helps. Cheers.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Neven MacEwan
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 5:11 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Last Active Control on a form
Nello
I prob should have
Hi all
I'm trying to save the last focused control on a form so when I reactivate
it This control has focus
Can anyone gove me a pointer?
TIA
Regards Neven
N.K. MacEwan B.E. EE
Ph 649 574 0027
Fax 649 570 2706
"A truth denied the light of action will wither to a promise, propaganda and
then
JED
Tried that but the form is not being deactivated it is only moving down in
the Z-Order
Thanks
Neven
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list delphi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 20 October 2000 14:48
Subject: Re: [DUG]: Last Active Control on a
501 - 600 of 942 matches
Mail list logo
