. And also, the binary here is
distributed through maven.
[ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Here's my +1
--
Clebert Suconic
gitbox is down (confrmed it on twitter @
https://status.apache.org/incidents/4mqjzt9ysd8w?u=w1f97xydgrxq (down
at the time I wrote the email).
So, I will redo it on monday.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:30 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Yes. I got that.
>
>
> I am giving the
e
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 22:08, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > @Robbie: I will take your findings as -1: Let me explain!
> >
> >
> > I'm thinking a next release will only happen rarely.. long time from
> now...
> >
> > So, I will rather
I will re-spin the 1.0.0 release shortly
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 5:08 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> @Robbie: I will take your findings as -1: Let me explain!
>
>
> I'm thinking a next release will only happen rarely.. long time from now...
>
> So, I will rather fix it
dont affect the binary, and they arent blockers, but do
> note the actual release is the source archive.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 20:15, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Robbie: They do not affect the binary at all, and are minor
> > issues
1, 2019 at 1:29 PM Robbie Gemmell wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 at 17:25, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Native 1.0.0 release.
> >
> > This is a sub component of ActiveMQ Artemis Native,
> >
> > Sou
is
distributed through maven.
[ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Here's my +1
--
Clebert Suconic
easy fix.
--
Clebert Suconic
The Project has been already created here. It includes the original
logs from the activemq-artemis folder.
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis-native
I will send a separate HEADS up to make a release tomorrow.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:33 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> As a Heads-
sages greater than a specific number).
>
> Thanks
> Saumya
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
--
Clebert Suconic
or only the Gitbox messages.
>
> Please confirm or deny my understanding.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 1:30 PM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > The list can only be created by the ActiveMQ PMC Chair.
> >
> > @Bruce Snyder can you
as gitbox,
for that.
and I will check if I can change the existing lists to gitbox, but I
believe I will need infra to help on that.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:49 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Ok, so far the best choice is git...@activemq.apache.org
>
>
> If anyone objects, let me kno
cycle for the JNI parts. I
> think lazy consensus is fine here and as long no one objects you can just
> go ahead and create it without a formal vote.
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:51 PM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > yep, so far the best name is ActiveMQ-Artemis-native
> >
s around it, lazy or otherwise.
> You suggestedgitbox@ yesterday and I asked for a timeline on when you might
> usethat so its clear at what point you consider lazy concensus agreed
> forgoing with it if noone replies discussing things further.RobbieOn Fri, 22
> Feb 2019 at 12:28, Clebe
rather it be a new list.Id actually be
> against (treat it as a -1) moving it to an existing list.Reasoning:By
> moving it to an alternative existing list the same arguement for not having
> it on dev can apply to then that list. E.g. what if i just want what i
> signed up to before and i d
before and i dont want the git noise, but i
> dont want to filter.All its doing is moving the problem.Sent from my Samsung
> Galaxy smartphone.> Original message From: Clebert Suconic
> Date: 21/02/2019 16:05 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject:
will also typically have a JIRA associated
> which comments get mirrored into as worklog, so they seem quite
> related. Once all that discussion happens, a change may or may nto get
> pushed, at which point it ends up with a mail on commits@.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 a
lets make it simple:
I suggest we create a list called git...@activemq.apache.org, and move
the traffic from gitbox/github discussions there.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:19 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> Comments inline
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 13:30, Clebert Sucon
:13 AM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > Robbie. I sent this message on feb-14. JB suggested commit list and I
> > agreed with him. So I assumed consensus.
> >
> >
> > If you like another list please let me know the name and make a post on the
> > Jira so this moves
Robbie. I sent this message on feb-14. JB suggested commit list and I
agreed with him. So I assumed consensus.
If you like another list please let me know the name and make a post on the
Jira so this moves on.
Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:37 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> If you pre
If you prefer issues@. I’m fine with that.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:29 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> This is a simple task. I did not think it would be a big deal. Those
> gitbox messages on the list are noise. (Everyone just filters them out). I
> don’t see a point in keeping them on
te it, and then we can ask infra to update
> > things to use it.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 12:03, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Lazy consensus was for the overal move. I didn't think on the list
> > > name (I
rall move as I too think the messages are fine where
> they are and are easily filterable, but I do admit the same applies in
> reverse; if we move them I'll typically just filter them back into the
> same place they were going originally.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Wed, 20 Feb 20
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17877
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:00 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I'm assuming consensus and I'm asking infra to move the gitbox
> messages to the commit message.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:44 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
I'm assuming consensus and I'm asking infra to move the gitbox
messages to the commit message.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:44 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Don’t get me wrong. I can do with filters personally.
>
> I just think this could be more friendly for new people joini
ptions, it will all come to
> one mailbox anyhow.Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> Original message ----From: Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> Date: 15/02/2019 22:39 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discuss] automated github
n my gmail account so that
> GitHub related messages get tagged with one label and everything else is a
> different one which solves the issue. I imagine most email providers have
> something similar.
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 3:20 AM Clebert Suconic >
> wrote:
>
> >
lot of noise in the mailbox. It
> requires constant cleaning/filtering and it is easy to miss discussions
> about subjects that interest me and for which I would like to help.
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:43 AM Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I
the clutter of github.
--
Clebert Suconic
n 31, 2019 at 10:04 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > forgot to answer another point.
> >
> > Right now it's for posix (Linux) only. but that could change as the
> > project progresses.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:51 AM Clebert Suconic
> > wr
forgot to answer another point.
Right now it's for posix (Linux) only. but that could change as the
project progresses.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:51 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> -- If the library is intended as a holder for "any JNI needed by Artemis,"
> then I don
this library Linux, or
> Posix, specific? Or, does it build on all systems that might be used to
> build Artemis?
>
> Art
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:52 PM Clebert Suconic >
> wrote:
>
> > Currently it’s used for JNi operations around storage. Mostly libido.
temis_jlibaio_LibaioContext_deleteContext()
> does
> > not free iocb on failed call to submit(), and as far as I can tell,
> > submit() also does not free the structure on failure.
> >
> > Did I miss something?
> >
> > Art
> >
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Currently it’s used for JNi operations around storage. Mostly libido. But
I foresee being used for other cases where we may need JNI.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:53 PM Arthur Naseef wrote:
> What is in the library?
>
> Art
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:08 AM Clebert Suconi
If/when Artemis becomes ActiveMQ, then that could certainly be an option to
> drop Artemis. But at this stage I think its too confusing.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
--
Clebert Suconic
y kind. I prefer that too even if, effectively ATM
> we will have just libAIO on it...
>
> Il giorno mer 30 gen 2019 alle ore 18:18 Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> > I would not like to make the libaio part of the name. A similar
> > m
that note, i think there are other bits that could be split out, a bit
> > like what occured in activemq5.
> > E.g. spring integration, protocol manager, other extensions
> > And should welcome this a little more with newer extensions or features
> > that enhance activemq but n
tphone.
> Original message From: Clebert Suconic
> Date: 30/01/2019 16:31 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis Native as a
> separated project
> One of the modules of ActiveMQ Artemis is the Na
on what to do here?
--
Clebert Suconic
I'm pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.4.
Downloads are now available at:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/download.html
For a complete list of updates:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/release-notes-2.6.4.html
As usual it contains a handful of bug fixes and other
.. I would appreciate it.
thanks
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:11 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Vote has passed with 7 +1 Votes
>
> Binding:
>
> +1 Clebert Suconic
> +1 Timothy Bish
> +1 Christopher Shannon
> +1 Michael Andre Pearce
>
>
> Non Binding:
>
&g
Vote has passed with 7 +1 Votes
Binding:
+1 Clebert Suconic
+1 Timothy Bish
+1 Christopher Shannon
+1 Michael Andre Pearce
Non Binding:
+1 Howard Gao
+1 Francesco Nigro
+1 Robbie Gemmel
Thank you so much for everyone who contributed, and took time to
review the release candidate.
I
>
> +1 (non-binding) with comment.
> * The dates in the NOTICE files still reference 2018 and need updated.
Thanks a lot! just updated it!
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.4 release.
This is a maintenance release, where we cherry-picked fixed bugs from
master into the 2.6.x streaming.
The release notes can be found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920=12344010
The
https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/1.0.0/tools.html
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
>
--
Clebert Suconic
as possible.
--
Clebert Suconic
I actually thought those messages were from commits. They are the github
comments.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 1:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Clebert,
>
> We have to create a Jira for INFRA to fix.
>
> I will do that.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/01/201
>>
> >> So, without objection, I will do the move on January, 9th (or if you
> >> think we can do it before, please let me know as I'm ready).
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Clebert Suconic
39 72 99 00
> Managing Director: Andreas Müller
> District Court: Amtsgericht Münster, HRB 16294
> VAT-No: DE199945912
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
> are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please
> not
f I get a message from an arbitrary position of
> > > the queue and remove it? I want to avoid a full scan of the transaction
> > > log, for example.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Andreas
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andreas Mueller
> > > IIT Software GmbH
> > > http://www.swiftmq.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > IIT Software GmbH
> > > Falkenhorst 11, 48155 Münster, Germany
> > > Phone: +49 (0)251 39 72 99 00
> > > Managing Director: Andreas Müller
> > > District Court: Amtsgericht Münster, HRB 16294
> > > VAT-No: DE199945912
> > >
> > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
> > you
> > > are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
> > > please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
> > > unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
> > > e-mail is strictly forbidden.
> > >
> > >
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
hanks,
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Clebert Suconic
t; >>>>>
> > >>>>> Our repositories are currently located on git-wip-us.apache.org.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This service will be decommissioned in the coming month.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'm proposing to move our repositories to gitbox.apache.org.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'm volunteer to start a vote, and if OK, I will deal with the
> infra.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thoughts ?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards
> > >>>>> JB
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > >>>>> jbono...@apache.org
> > >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Daniel Kulp
> > >>>> dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> -
> http://dankulp.com/blog <
> > >> http://dankulp.com/blog>
> > >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://talend.com <
> http://coders.talend.com/>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbono...@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Clebert Suconic
e has to be tied to a specific version when you can always just
> increase the version number by 1 (the exception being breaking changes
> obviously and major things that would make more sense in a major version
> number change)
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 1:43 PM Clebert Suconic
>
ould be fine to proceed
> even later today if it seems ready and noone specifically objects, so
> it is out before people start to disappear for holidays. Other
> versions numbers are still available if anyone needs to do another
> release after.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Mon, 17 Dec 201
Would be too bad if I cut this tomorrow? So we have time for a vote before
the Christmas week. Or anyone would rather have it next year ?
I had promised few weeks back but i was busy with a big chunk of work
around performance on AMQP.
--
Clebert Suconic
gitbox.apache.org.
> > >
> > > I'm volunteer to start a vote, and if OK, I will deal with the infra.
> > >
> > > Thoughts ?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > > --
> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > jbono...@apache.o
Just looked at the email from infra. I don’t think we need a vote. It’s
something we *have* to do anyways.
We should discuss how.
Like the repo name change on GitHub is something I would like to avoid.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:12 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Would the repo name be chan
t;
> I'm proposing to move our repositories to gitbox.apache.org.
>
> I'm volunteer to start a vote, and if OK, I will deal with the infra.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
--
Clebert Suconic
gt; > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > years and doing a bunch of refactoring just opens it
> up to
> > > > new bugs
> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > have to be fixed. Fixing bugs is not a problem
> however I
> > > > tend to be
> > > > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > > > sensitive to store related changes because of the
> possible
> > > > data loss
> > > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > > corruption issues to production data that can occur
> from
> > > > store bugs
> > > > > > > > vs
> > > > > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > > other random bug in the broker.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:59 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > > > > > > j...@nanthrax.net
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > OK, got it. It's more a syntax/codebase organization
> > > > refactoring.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > If there's no impact on the behavior and features,
> +1 from
> > > > my side.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > JB
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 25/11/2018 21:21, Jamie G. wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Initially its to make KahaDB classes easier to
> read &
> > > > maintain.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Eventually it will help in features/performance;
> smaller
> > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > easier to grok, easier to see improvements.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of trying to refactor all of it in one go,
> I'm
> > > > taking the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > approach of one area at a time.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > One pass for breaking out objects.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Another pass for small functional improvements.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps future passes for new Java features (bring
> all
> > > > code up to
> > > > > > > > > > Java
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 8 perhaps?).
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 4:32 PM Jean-Baptiste
> Onofré <
> > > > > > > > > > j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Jamie,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> That's interesting.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> What's the rationale behind the refactoring ? New
> > > > features or
> > > > > > > > perf
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> improvements ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> JB
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 25/11/2018 20:16, Jamie G. wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Hi All,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> I've taken some time to prototype a refactored
> > > > KahaDBStore
> > > > > > > > class:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > https://github.com/jgoodyear/activemq/tree/KahaDBRefactor
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> As KahaDBStore exists in Master, it contains 7
> internal
> > > > > > > > classes,
> > > > > > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> some 1677 lines of code.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> In my refactor branch I've separated out those
> classes
> > > > into
> > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > own
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> files, and applied some gentle clean code
> practices to
> > > > help
> > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > these
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> files easier to read and maintain.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> I'd like to gather feed back from the community;
> I've
> > > > taken
> > > > > > > > care
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> change functionality as little as possible - the
> aim
> > > > here is to
> > > > > > > > > > reduce
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> complexity and improve maintainability. If the
> > > > community feels
> > > > > > > > > > this is
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> a worth while goal than I'll open a card on Jira
> &
> > > > prepare a
> > > > > > > > PR.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Notes:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> ActiveMQ KahaDB Store and ActiveMQ-Unit-Tests
> suites
> > > > remain
> > > > > > > > > > passing
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> after refactor.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Jamie
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> jbono...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > > > > > > > > > > jbono...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > > > > > > > > > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > >
>
--
Clebert Suconic
t; > > > > > > > Instead of trying to refactor all of it in one go, I'm taking
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > approach of one area at a time.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > One pass for breaking out objects.
> > > > > > > > > Another pass for small functional improvements.
> > > > > > > > > Perhaps future passes for new Java features (bring all code
> > > > > > > > > up to
> > > > > > Java
> > > > > > > > > 8 perhaps?).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 4:32 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > > > > > j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Hi Jamie,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> That's interesting.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> What's the rationale behind the refactoring ? New features or
> > > > perf
> > > > > > > > >> improvements ?
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Regards
> > > > > > > > >> JB
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On 25/11/2018 20:16, Jamie G. wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>> Hi All,
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> I've taken some time to prototype a refactored KahaDBStore
> > > > class:
> > > > > > > > >>> https://github.com/jgoodyear/activemq/tree/KahaDBRefactor
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> As KahaDBStore exists in Master, it contains 7 internal
> > > > classes,
> > > > > > over
> > > > > > > > >>> some 1677 lines of code.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> In my refactor branch I've separated out those classes into
> > > > their
> > > > > > own
> > > > > > > > >>> files, and applied some gentle clean code practices to help
> > > > make
> > > > > > these
> > > > > > > > >>> files easier to read and maintain.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> I'd like to gather feed back from the community; I've taken
> > > > care
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >>> change functionality as little as possible - the aim here
> > > > > > > > >>> is to
> > > > > > reduce
> > > > > > > > >>> complexity and improve maintainability. If the community
> > > > > > > > >>> feels
> > > > > > this is
> > > > > > > > >>> a worth while goal than I'll open a card on Jira & prepare a
> > > > PR.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> Notes:
> > > > > > > > >>> ActiveMQ KahaDB Store and ActiveMQ-Unit-Tests suites remain
> > > > > > passing
> > > > > > > > >>> after refactor.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> Cheers,
> > > > > > > > >>> Jamie
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > > > > > > >> jbono...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > > > > > > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > > > > > > jbono...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > > > > > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
--
Clebert Suconic
bcad7e1f6a6dd078d87787a03b56560e995ef773
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72
> > hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.8
> > [ ] -1 (provide specific comments)
> >
> > Here's my +1
> >
>
--
Clebert Suconic
Of course if anyone from Europe (or anyone else who doesn't care about
the holiday next week) want to be the release manager next week, we
could have a 2.6.x release as early as next week.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:27 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I would like for a new 2.6.x
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from:
> > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
What about this. WE could :
- commit this on git
- upload a snapshot for review under our web-site.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:46 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> +1000. We had that options discussed here a few times. Having the old
> website somewhere with a link is the
ct 12, 2018 at 2:44 AM Martyn Taylor
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Cheers gents, looks like we're all set with the git repos.
> > > > >
> > > > > Shall we start putting together a ToDo list for what needs to
> happen
> &g
Or simpler pause (block|fail) as an argument.
And resume.
Protocol specific flow control is already an issue and could be treated
differently.
This would be just an extension of what’s already implement and not very
extensive to insolent.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:05 AM Clebert Suconic
feature.
> > >
> > > Here is my current implementation:
> > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2371
> > >
> > > The idea is to keep a list of blocked/unblock addresses set by the
> user.
> > > Any incoming messages will be checked against the list and if its
> address
> > > is blocked, it will be rejected and an exception will be thrown to the
> > > clients. It works for all types of clients (core, openwire, jms, mqtt
> > > etc).
> > >
> > > Any comments are welcome.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Howard
> > >
> >
>
--
Clebert Suconic
How to delete one now ?
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 6:55 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Whoops, I just created one as well:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-website.git
>
> Bruce
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 8:49 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> >
New repo created:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-www.git
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 10:47 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Robbie Gemmel pointed me to https://gitbox.apache.org/
>
> I'm trying to create one now:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 10:36 AM Clebert Suconic
> wro
Robbie Gemmel pointed me to https://gitbox.apache.org/
I'm trying to create one now:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 10:36 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> That's for Bruce Snyder then...
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 10:29 AM Justin Bertram wrote:
> >
> > There's a "Create a
;
> Justin
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:24 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > I create an Infra JIRA for this:
> >
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17124
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:49 AM Clebert Suconic
> > wrote:
>
I create an Infra JIRA for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17124
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:49 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I asked infra and no reponse.
>
> Does anyone know any procedure on creating a repo at apache?
>
>
> I did ask infra about somethin
I asked infra and no reponse.
Does anyone know any procedure on creating a repo at apache?
I did ask infra about something what to do.. but so far no response. I
know they are busy.. so if anyone here knows a better way to handle
this
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:14 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote
t the new website live and have more clear
> information on there such as what Artemis is, etc.
>
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 9:13 AM Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
> > I will handle it next week.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 5:09 PM Bruce Snyder
> > wro
I will handle it next week.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 5:09 PM Bruce Snyder wrote:
> Hi Clebert,
>
> It would be very helpful if you could create a git repo for it and get the
> source code moved into there.
>
> Bruce
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:58 AM Clebert Suconi
d a demohttps://michaelandrepearce.github.io/activemq-website
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
--
Clebert Suconic
Where we release no matter and simply what makes it in makes it, and anything
> missing because theres a timeline you know when it will be next.
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
--
Clebert Suconic
tps://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-website/
> > And a demohttps://michaelandrepearce.github.io/activemq-website
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
>
>
> --
> perl -e 'print
> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
--
Clebert Suconic
ctivemq-website
>
> Regards
>
> Michael
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
--
Clebert Suconic
26087
> >
> > This report must be submitted to the board on Oct 10.
> >
> > Thank you in advance!
> >
> > Bruce
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Clebert Suconic
its likely to be an issue in future.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 21:42, Robbie Gemmell
> wrote:
> >
> > As Tim says it is still broken, I didn't change anything since my mail
> earlier.
> >
> > On 12 July 2018 at 21:29, Timothy Bish wrote:
> > >
release but
we have included 100 commits on this version:
http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/commit-report-2.6.3.html
Refer to the release notes and commit report for a complete list of bug fixes.
Many thanks for all the contributors on this release.
--
Clebert Suconic
<
> robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> Date: 07/09/2018 14:53 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Network cable disconnected
> qpid-jms sets the netty connect timeout option, defaulting it to
> 60sec, with a URI option to reconfigure it.
>
> On Thu, 6 Sep
Results of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.3 release vote.
Vote passes with 4 Binding Votes, 2 Non Binding Votes
Binding:
Clebert Suconic
Martyn Taylor
Christopher Shannon
Timothy Bish
Non Binding:
Francesco Nigro,
Michael Pearce
Thank you to everyone who contributed and took the time
gt; > dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.3
> > Clebert the pr you tag here is for a seperate feature.
> > That particular pr is adding similar updateability for filter but avoids
> > the very issue here.
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
2 seconds personally.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 23:18, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> >
> > TL;DR: Should we make use of Netty_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT by default, as
> > the connection would block forever if the IP on the live server is
> > gone.
>
would make that on the vote results.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:38 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> First, we need to agree it's an issue at all! I'm not 100% convinced...
>
>
> if someone updates the Queue, and set force=true.. it's expected to have
> issues.
>
>
> We coul
; alternative in pipeline?
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> > Original message From: Clebert Suconic <
> > clebert.suco...@gmail.com> Date: 06/09/2018 14:27 (GMT+00:00) To:
> > dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] A
shouldn't be
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> Original message ----From: Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com> Date: 06/09/2018 12:43 (GMT+00:00) To:
> dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.3
> It is no
Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.3
> +1
>
> Il mer 5 set 2018, 18:03 Martyn Taylor ha scritto:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Christopher Shannon <
> > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> >
TL;DR: Should we make use of Netty_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT by default, as
the connection would block forever if the IP on the live server is
gone.
Long version:
I'm kind of proud of this little test I wrote, which I have committed here:
apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> > >> ctId=12311210=12343805
> > >>
> > >> You can get the release artifacts here:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.6/
> > >>
> > >> Maven repository is at:
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> > >> activemq-1172/
> > >>
> > >> Source tag:
> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq.git;a=com
> > >> mit;h=cf6aa9427ab6f8aa68a9c62652acd103151ce5eb
> > >>
> > >> Please vote to approve this release. The vote will remain open for 72
> > >> hours.
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.6
> > >> [ ] -1 (provide specific comments)
> > >>
> > >> Here's my +1
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
--
Clebert Suconic
ort.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
>
--
Clebert Suconic
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.6.3 release.
This release has many bug fixes and a few performance improvements,
and it contains exactly 100 commits, covering 54 JIRAs. Thanks a lot
to all who contributed.
A report of commits can be found here:
This is it.. baking...
I will send the voters thread when done.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:21 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> I had some issue finishing
> https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2281
>
>
> Now that I finished it.. I'm about to cut it..
>
> I will
I had some issue finishing https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2281
Now that I finished it.. I'm about to cut it..
I will start the script tonight.. so if you have anything to send in,
do it with a git cherry-pick -x into 2.6.x
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:58 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote
I am working on a latest fix I should have sent by tomorrow..
Would anyone have anything else to send it? what about I cut it
tomorrow afternoon (US EST time).?
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:24 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
>
> Ok.. lets hold it.. and I will work on it.
--
Clebert Suconic
s kind of the point of having an API in the first
> place (i.e. the implementation can change without impacting clients).
>
>
> Justin
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > JBoss AMQ 7 is product
recated... although I found
> a blog that says openwire might one day be deprecated
> (https://blog.joshdreagan.com/2017/12/01/upgrading_amq_6_to_amq_7/).
>
> Should anyone be attempting to connecting a legacy NMS client application
> to
> AMQ 7? Or is that asking for trouble? Please help me understand if/how c#
> client applications will need to be changed once an AMQ broker is upgraded
> to AMQ 7.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
>
--
Clebert Suconic
s, you
> use the corresponding compiled native lib.
> This way those on 64bit get the advantage. Yet supporting those on 32bit
> still where needed.
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
> Original message From: Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suc
701 - 800 of 1843 matches
Mail list logo
