On 07/12/2021 16:16, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/12/2021 11:36, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
+1
Release early, release often
Anyhow, who I'm I to say, not even metinioned on
https://httpd.apache.org/contributors
On 06/12/2021 11:36, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
+1
Release early, release often
Regards
--
^TM
On 06/12/2021 12:27, Noel Butler wrote:
On 06/12/2021 20:36, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
Kind Regards,
Stefan
-1
Thats days before christmas, most testers and i'm sure devs will be in
holiday mode, even if not, that
Should have vote -1
Patch
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1889037=rev
breaks Windows
On 25/05/2021 19:58, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Hi all,
With 8 binding PMC +1 votes, 5 additional +1 votes from the community,
and no -1 votes, I'm pleased to report that the vote has PASSED to
release
On 27.11.2018. 12:23, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In the coming week or so, I will be committing my load balance,
load determination and discovery work to a sandbox trunk. Many
people have asked for more info, so here we go.
Thanks for the info.
Like said, I'm for the idea for
On 30.10.2018. 13:53, Jim Jagielski wrote:
As some of you know, one of my passions and area of focus is
on the use of Apache httpd as a reverse proxy and, as such, load
balancing, failover, etc are of vital interest to me.
Been a while, but seems I'm back :D
Love the idea to have more
On 12/14/2012 01:10 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
- The Used count in balancer manager drops to 0 after restart/reboot
with persist on. It seems the slot management is not completely right.
Not yet further investigated.
IMHO this should actually be a desired behaviour.
I suppose one would expect to
On 12/14/2012 05:15 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.12.2012 17:11, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/14/2012 01:10 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
- The Used count in balancer manager drops to 0 after restart/reboot
with persist on. It seems the slot management is not completely right.
Not yet further
On 07/18/2012 05:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Is it possible that this results in flaky behavior depending on
third-party software installed?
Well, MSDN clearly states:
quote
Note: The function pointer for the AcceptEx function must be obtained
at run time by making a call to the WSAIoctl
On 02/13/2012 02:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] +1: Good to go
Non binding of course.
Few windows glitches, but mostly build related.
Regards
--
^TM
On 02/13/2012 04:55 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/12/2012 11:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Note that I have used VC 6.0 + Server 2003R2 PSDK and
build directly from .dsw/.dsp files.
Also I used pcre sources from old httpd (the cmake build just sucks
and I cannot make that working on windoze
On 02/12/2012 04:57 PM, Mario Brandt wrote:
Bug 52402[1] isn't working yet. I wonder why it is marked as fixed in
2.4.x CHANGES[2] The shared memory stuff doesn't work yet on windows.
Odd Behavior:
1. If mod_auth_digest is loaded and on Windows Vista/2008/7 do not try
to start from console, it
Hi,
mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by design.
On windows we have two processes so the storage-grab/slotmem_grab
will always fail because the inuse flag was already set in the parent,
and since this is shared memory child will see it as used.
On unixes fork is used so the inuse is set only
On 02/03/2012 11:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
mod_slotmem cannot work on windows by design.
On windows we have two processes so the storage-grab/slotmem_grab
will always fail because the inuse flag was already set in the parent,
and since
On 02/03/2012 02:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 3, 2012, at 8:03 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Right, seems that's not the reason for PR52402.
Found the fix for it. The reason is the loop:
while (s) {
int i,j;
proxy_balancer *balancer;
sconf = s-module_config
On 01/03/2012 09:22 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Since I have been the most vocal about this watchdog/hearmonitor/heartbeats on
windows ... I should chime in.
Is the issue still present and what the issue actually is.
I have watchdog/hearmonitor/heartbeat working on windows
using the current svn
On 02/04/2012 12:27 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/3/2012 12:51 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
a way of monitoring a cluster of servers and opening another way of balancing
the load
(lb_meathod_byheartbeat).
This is what I see when I look at the bundle.
With what external mechanisms that exist
On 12/08/2011 01:04 PM, Steffen wrote:
Building out of the box on Windows including apr_crypto_oppenssl.
Also apr_crypto_nss compiles fine, but have no nss3.lib here yet, so cannot
link now.
1. You should use apr developers list
http://apr.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
2. Use Mozilla's
On 12/08/2011 03:47 PM, Steffen wrote:
When APU-HAVE-CRYPTO = 0 and build project seperate it generates fine a
apr_crypto_nss-1.dll (dynam)
When APU-HAVE-CRYPTO = 1 and build project seperate it fails with:
-- Build started: Project: apr_crypto_nss, Configuration: Release
Win32 --
On 12/05/2011 08:41 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/5/2011 1:22 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Like said on another thread, give me couple of days and I'll fix the issue.
Well, as soon as I compile httpd-2.4 on windows which might be tricky cause
build procedure is completely broken
On 12/05/2011 08:41 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/5/2011 1:22 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Like said on another thread, give me couple of days and I'll fix the issue.
Well, as soon as I compile httpd-2.4 on windows which might be tricky cause
build procedure is completely broken
On 12/04/2011 10:33 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/4/2011 8:46 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Picking up this old discussion:
Well, this is the same chunk of Win32 specific debugging code causing this
module to
crash yet again.
Gregg: Can you tell us, in which line it is crashing?
Debugger says
On 12/05/2011 10:57 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/5/2011 5:15 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Please backport to 2.4.
Like said, already backported.
Regards
--
^TM
On 12/03/2011 08:32 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/2/2011 3:48 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
- modules docs
- the follwing modules added since 2.2 lack documentation
- mod_watchdog
- mod_heartbeat
- mod_heartmonitor
- mod_lbmethod_heartbeat
I vote these off the Windows boat, mod_watchdog crashes
On 12/04/2011 06:37 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's shoot for an RC1 this week. I'll RM.
Do we have bundled apr/apr-util versions defined?
Regards
--
^TM
On 12/04/2011 07:25 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Dec 2011, at 8:03 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Let's shoot for an RC1 this week. I'll RM.
Do we have bundled apr/apr-util versions defined?
Ideally we want apr-util v1.4.0, which is yet to be released. I've proposed to
RM a release of apr-util
On 12/04/2011 10:33 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/4/2011 8:46 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Picking up this old discussion:
On 03.07.2011 19:40, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/1/2011 12:26 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/01/2011 06:31 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hi folks,
Well, this is the same
On 07/03/2011 02:21 PM, Steffen wrote:
The candidate Windows binary is now available at:
http://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=18457
Not that it belongs here, but may I ask why the .rar?
Regards
--
^TM
On 07/03/2011 07:40 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/1/2011 12:26 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/01/2011 06:31 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Attached patch just gets rid of it.
This cannot be omitted.
Getting the parent pid means we we are in the child process, so we must not
init the parent
On 07/03/2011 08:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/3/2011 1:49 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
I offered that to the httpd couple of years back,
but the rejection was: Who will maintain windows nmake files
IMHO those are few order of magnitude simpler then maintaining
VS workspace/solutions
On 07/03/2011 08:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/3/2011 1:52 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Mladen, do you know anything of cl.exe's ability to generate dependencies?
I've never looked before.
I created an util
On 07/01/2011 09:10 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hi Mladen,
Ok, I'm just a dumb guy but for me, if it drops to the hard drive (it's built
on my platform) it should at minimum load without crashing the server.
Who said anything about being dumb.
If it crashes on load, it should be fixed. Simple
On 07/01/2011 06:08 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hi Bill, Steffen,
All I can add to this at the moment is this is happening in XP, I am running in
Vista x86 just fine. I have not built on 2008 R2 x64 yet but I will assume
(ouch) for now it will work fine there as well.
Same here. XP/SP3 is
On 07/01/2011 07:57 PM, Steffen wrote:
PCRE is now a dep.
Download 8.12 from ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/
and compile the pcre.dll with CMake options:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS and CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE RelWithDebInfo.
That's ridiculous.
WTF has httpd win32 port gone?
Regards
On 07/01/2011 09:45 PM, Steffen wrote:
No problem for me to distribute the non ASF(apr) deps at
http://www.apachelounge.com/
Like pcre, lua, openssl and zlib.
Right, and after so many years it is now
impossible to build httpd from ASF source dist only.
Since you cannot compile httpd without
On 07/01/2011 06:31 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hi folks,
Well, this is the same chunk of Win32 specific debugging code causing this module to
crash yet again. I remember suggesting it be removed before, now I am a little more
adamant about it because it is really not needed, IMO of course. If
On 05/25/2011 02:27 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
I attached the patch to a bug opened by Cameron Stokes
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841
Just a quick note on the first thing I saw:
+//worker-lbfactor = atoi(val);
+worker-lbfactor = strtol(val, NULL, 10);
On 03/21/2011 12:47 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Nobody has offered a reasonable response, let's try this again... the
availability of pcre and expat are generally a both-or-neither proposition
on most distributions. Ergo, any one of the following resolutions would
restore logically
On 03/18/2011 04:12 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
What would it take, from our side or from Stefan's, to make it ok for us to say go
here for Windows binaries? It surely seems that this would be a big win for both of
us.
AFAICT they do not
On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our
stable-ABI builds
+1
Regards
--
^TM
On 03/18/2011 04:55 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP
binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our
stable-ABI builds
+1
On 03/18/2011 05:19 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 18 March 2011 07:24, Rich Bowenrbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
If I read this right, this is a similar issue to what we have in the
Python world with some Python extension modules on Windows.
One discussion thread about it can be found at:
On 01/31/2011 11:54 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com
mailto:n...@webthing.com wrote:
On 31 Jan 2011, at 09:39, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
does that mean that you can either support/provide the VC6 OR the VC9
builds, but not both?
On 01/31/2011 04:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
There are a host of reasons we never supported MSVCRn where n is an
arbitrary value modified by Microsoft on a biannual basis.
But indeed, at 2.4 we will be shipping to the then-shipping crt, not
vc9.
And the winner would be?
Regards
--
On 01/31/2011 04:36 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/31/2011 4:05 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
I believe also that wrowe mentioned to me that we wanted to support
command line (make) builds, and VC9 doesn't allow us to export makefiles.
I'm +1 for making both VC6 and VC9 builds from 2.4 and
On 01/31/2011 06:20 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/31/2011 9:55 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
There is a solution to use DDK7.1
It can create binaries that links to MSVCRT, however
this works for XP+ only.
Which works... provided we continue on the makefile approach or use msbuild.
Note
On 01/31/2011 07:33 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/31/2011 12:17 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
If we resist on using CRT stuff like strcpy_l/strcpy_s, _fstat64i32 and
other weirdness from contemporary CRTs, we'd be fine.
Actually most of those date back to msvcrt.dll or have been added over
On 01/07/2011 08:27 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
For right now, APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY and APR_HAS_THREADS
should be dropped for 2.3/2.4. I'd be happy with that for
now ;)
+1
I raised that question few years back and was told
that the reason for (at least APR_HAS_THREAD) was
not the lack of os
On 04/07/2010 03:31 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
In mod_proxy_balancer after
runtime = find_session_route(*balancer, r,route,sticky, url);
There is a logic that belongs to the LB implementation, my idea is to add a
apr_status_t (*updatelbstatus)(proxy_balancer *balancer, proxy_worker
On 03/16/2010 06:24 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I thought the only people who ever capitalize HTTP in httpd are
clueless lawyers.
apache_1.2.4.tar.gz/ABOUT_APACHE
The Apache HTTP Server Project
http://www.apache.org/
June 1997
Seems the HTTPD is used for a long time
Regards
--
^TM
On 03/16/2010 09:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I thought the only people who ever capitalize HTTP in httpd are
clueless lawyers.
apache_1.2.4.tar.gz/ABOUT_APACHE
The Apache HTTP Server Project
http://www.apache.org/
June 1997
Seems the HTTPD is used for a long time
I'm sorry,
On 03/04/2010 12:29 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
I'm fairly happy with refusing client-initiated reneg regardless.
+1
Explicit OpenSSL option
e.g. SSL_OP_DISABLE_CLIENT_INITED_RENEGOTIATION
would be helpful and we won't be needing info callback
in that case (which doesn't get called from
On 03/02/2010 07:09 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate at the usual /dev/dist/ URL; Your votes please...
+/-1
[ X] Release 2.2.15
Win32/Win64/Fedora12/Solaris10
I'll proceed to fight with win32 tomorrow, fighting with my linux vm was
enough fun for one day :)
BTW, I
On 03/03/2010 07:02 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/3/2010 11:50 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 03 March 2010, Mladen Turk wrote:
BTW, I wouldn't recommend to compile against 0.9.8m.
openssl s_client 0.9.8m block on renegotiation
Have you only tried 0.9.8l as client? It has
On 03/03/2010 10:34 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/3/2010 2:00 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Right, and I'm afraid if SSLInsecureRenegotiation (default) isn't set
while compiled with 0.9.8m one can easily create an DoS attack.
Stop.
Weather I stop or not it will not make that disappear
On 03/03/2010 11:01 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 06:31:36PM +, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
If I understand the code correctly it looks like Apache is already
trapping and aborting client initiated renegotiations so this hang
situation shouldn't arise.
This is true for
On 03/03/2010 11:33 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Seriously, I was hoping 0.9.8m will reject legacy clients,
unless explicitly SSL_OP_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION is set,
but it seems that's not the case or we are doing something wrong in
mod_ssl.
It rejects the renegotation. It is
On 03/03/2010 11:45 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/3/2010 4:44 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Sure that could be the solution if there is no option to tell the
server to make that decision.
It's not the server's to make, this alert follows the TLS specification.
Didn't meant that, but anyhow
On 17/11/09 10:06, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
I now see the following warning:
ssl_engine_kernel.c: In function `ssl_callback_Info':
ssl_engine_kernel.c:1943: warning: passing arg 1 of `SSL_state' discards
qualifiers from pointer target type
See the:
On 16/11/09 11:33, Mark Watts wrote:
The statistics one gets from both /balancer-manager and mod_status are
useful but of course only exist until httpd is restarted.
It would be nice if they could be configured to periodically write some
lines to the error log (at LogLevel info or so) with
On 06/11/09 20:07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like we remove the entire forwarding proxy stuff
for example.
So we have mod_forward_proxy and mod_reverse_proxy? Interesting
take. Would make some sense to make mod_proxy and top-level framework
and forward/reverse as submodules.
I'd like that
On 05/11/09 12:38, Graham Leggett wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's get 2.4 out. And then let's rip it to shreds and drop
buckets/brigades and fold in serf.
I think we should decide on exactly what problem we're trying to solve,
before we start thinking about how it is to be solved.
+1
On 16/07/09 00:46, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that William Rowe Jr. be and hereby is
appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache HTTP Server, to
serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of
Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
Paul Querna wrote:
This deals with removing an event from the pollset, but what about an
event that had already fired, as I gave in the original example of a
timeout event firing the same time a socket close event happened?
In that case I suppose the only solution is to make the operations
ricardo13 wrote:
I want to modify MPM Worker (worker.c) to develop some scheduling
algorithms.
A first scheduling algorithm would be implement priority. Two queues
(worker_queue1 and worker_queue2) of sockets where threads (workers) get
all requests from worker_queue1 first, afterget all
ricardo13 wrote:
Anyone ??
We are all on a vacation, sorry.
Hi all,
I would like to know how I create other queue of requests ?? Where I
create ?? worker.c ??
What in your terminology creation of other/another queue of requests.
The only thing I can think of is the ap_sub_req API
Paul Querna wrote:
Can't sleep, so finally writing this email I've been meaning to write
for about 7 months now :D
Pools don't help, but don't really make it worse, and are good enough
for the actual cleanup part -- the difficultly lies in knowing *when*
you can cleanup an object.
Pool pre
shaniro herath wrote:
Hi Iroshan and All,
Same problem here. I passed function with infinite while loop when
creating the thread . Thread creation is done inside a function of
another module. But after call the module function thread also
terminate. What are the steps that I have missed
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
See asp_module_lock - this is entire windows specific;
I see. Nice trick.
you are right
that we don't have the API to pin the module in an apr-manner. That
really shouldn't be all that hard to do, I'll look. The register_hook
API seems
h iroshan wrote:
Hi All,
I want to open a port to communicate my Apache hhtpd (2.2) with small
software run on a separate machine .Without affecting the httpd how can
i create a new thread to listen to that software.
Also I want to start this thread when the mod_proxy_balancer is
h iroshan wrote:
Hi All
Actually I need *to* modify *Apache* and *run* one custom background
*thread*. In addition, my custom modules have *to* be able *to* access
the shared memory and it should be done through the background *thread*.
Did anybody do this before? Is *there* an example I can
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
However it requires to be statically compiled so it
can survive the child death.
*That's* the reason for static?!? See mod_aspdotnet and several
others for how to pin a particular .so module for the lifetime of
the process, instead of per-restart.
Why can't we
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
To clarify, it's no longer possible to pipe 'hugefile' through
rotatelogs with 1MB granularity. This should at least be noted
in the docs if the patch is accepted.
Jim is traveling, it would be good to get his feedback Monday
on your proposed
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I'd leave rotatelogs alone, please. Its design is not flawed. But
I think Jim was working on something which would release the file
just as soon as its time is up, and that is useful across all of
the architectures, not windows specific
Dan Poirier wrote:
Would wait_for_io_or_timeout() be a good candidate for apr?
There is apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout but it uses the
apr_file_t-timeout which can be set only for pipes
and sockets.
Also the Win32 code will work only for stdhandles because
they are pipes.
In essence the answer
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Any particular reason why not using apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout
at least on unix?
See the answer I gave to Dan.
It uses file internal timeout which we cannot set, so no
it cannot be used.
Regards
--
^(TM)
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Code was testes both on windows and linux and it works like
a charm (rotation is done at exact time regardless of log events).
Foolish question, but rather than waking up every second, isn't it more
rational to compute the expiry of the current
Hi,
Currently rotatelogs (at least on windows) holds the initial
log file by parent process (well it tries to rotate if something
is written from parent which is impossible for access logs).
I plan to use the apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout before calling
the apr_file_read(f_stdin, ...). This would
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Currently rotatelogs (at least on windows) holds the initial
log file by parent process (well it tries to rotate if something
is written from parent which is impossible for access logs).
I plan to use the apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout before
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Wouldn't it be better if we simply implement the mechanism to share
the same handle between the parent and child?
Since the parent does not receive any access log hits how
would that prevent it from holding that handle forever?
The parent's
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Why? Timeout on reading from stdin is a nice and clean way for making the
rotation to happen even when there is no log entries fired that would
break the block on stdin. Rotation would always happen at midnight,
not at some random point of time
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 5, 2009, at 4:45 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
There are 2 weird things in the logic.
- In ap_proxy_add_worker_to_balancer() we make a copy of the worker,
why not just the address?
If you looks to child_init() in mod_proxy and
Paul Querna wrote:
mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules that expose
additional functions to the API. (mod_proxy and mod_cache do too!)
So, you came back from different direction, cool :)
If you really like to put the watchdog functionality
inside the mpm (and IMO that's
Paul Querna wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Inside a MPM that does it natively, just use the registered list of
providers, and implement the same behavoirs as the module.
The problem with mpm is that (IIRC the proposal) it uses
the current free
Paul Querna wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Inside a MPM that does it natively, just use the registered list of
providers, and implement the same behavoirs
Jim Jagielski wrote:
fine, disagree with that, but what are your thoughts on switching to
the provider API?
+1 to provider... it's one of the best parts of httpd
But it uses the provider already :)
Regards
--
^(TM)
Jim Jagielski wrote:
FWIW, this means that apr-1.4 is no longer viable for httpd-trunk.
As of a few days ago, I could build with 1.4.x no longer.
Are we *sure* we want to do that?
I was under the impression that apr-2 is now mandatory,
regardless of the apr-2 permission setter api.
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
IMHO we shouldn't require APR 2.0 for trunk (although trunk should be capable
to run with 2.0).
Apart from the other stuff you mentioned before it makes it much harder to cut
2.4.
So I am -1 on this change until APR 2.0 is at least in beta state.
So Mladen
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 03/28/2009 08:11 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Current trunk gives the
$ ./httpd -k start
httpd: illegal option -- k
Is there some new config directive that needs
to be added since mpm redesign, or it's just
a temporary bug?
I guess it is bug that has something to do
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
$ ./httpd -k start
httpd: illegal option -- k
Is there some new config directive that needs
to be added since mpm redesign, or it's just
a temporary bug?
I guess it is bug that has something to do with
how ap_mpm_rewrite_args is now called.
Well they were not
Paul Querna wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:17 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sun Mar 29 19:17:30 2009
New Revision: 759751
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759751view=rev
Log:
Use child singleton watchdog for running the heartbeat module
Modified:
Current trunk gives the
$ ./httpd -k start
httpd: illegal option -- k
$ ./httpd -V
Server version: Apache/2.3.3-dev (Unix)
Server built: Mar 28 2009 19:59:29
Server's Module Magic Number: 20090208:1
Server loaded: APR 2.0.0-dev, APR-UTIL 2.0.0-dev
Compiled using: APR 2.0.0-dev, APR-UTIL
Jeff Trawick wrote:
(no plans here to touch WinNT MPMs, and I don't see any compelling
reason to leave it broken; it should build as before once the inevitable
minor slips are corrected)
The major problem with that is the huge amount of platform
dependent code for managing the service,
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
mailto:mt...@apache.org wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
(no plans here to touch WinNT MPMs, and I don't see any
compelling reason to leave it broken; it should build as before
once
Paul Querna wrote:
I was hoping someone will address the separation of
child process management from the mpm.
Majority of this stuff is common and duplicated across
mpms while there can be an api for that thought.
Yes, the simple mpm inteded to go there, and only uses APR functions
for
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If someone is shipping apr trunk, that's a big
mistake (theirs, not ours, we'll still ship the true apr 2.0 at some
point which will be grossly incompatible to such one-offs).
Part of this is the desire by Paul to move the project to scons. I'm
prepared to merge
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I wouldn't be at all surprised if other folks are already using APR
trunk with httpd trunk daily and I've missed something basic, so
comments appreciated ;)
Right, I hand-crafted this, so you have my +1
Anyhow, what about making some release apr-2 dependent
so we can
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/2/17 Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/2/17 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com:
I did used to perform a dup, but was told that this would cause
problems with file locking. Specifically was told:
I'm getting lost here. What has file locking got
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2009/2/17 Joe Orton jor...@redhat.com:
I did used to perform a dup, but was told that this would cause
problems with file locking. Specifically was told:
I'm getting lost here. What has file locking got to do with it? Does
mod_wscgi rely on file locking somehow?
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
+}
+if (w-is_running w-callbacks == NULL) {
+/* This is hook mode watchdog
+ * running on WatchogInterval
+ */
+w-step += (apr_time_now() - curr);
+if (w-step = wd_interval) {
+if
1 - 100 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
