[GitHub] [jena] DamienFontaine commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-04-02 Thread GitBox
DamienFontaine commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-478899467 Is everyone agrees with the last @xristy version ? This is an automated

[GitHub] [jena] xristy commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-04-02 Thread GitBox
xristy commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-479007515 +1 for last version This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #551: JENA-1699: Clear deleted prefix from the abbreviation map

2019-04-03 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #551: JENA-1699: Clear deleted prefix from the abbreviation map URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/551 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [jena] seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-03 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-479412885 @afs I've pushed a bunch of changes based off your feedback. I think it's quite neat now apart from the creation of the _combined jar_ as

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #547: JENA-1688: add methods Node#asBlank, Node#asConcret, Node#asLiteral, Node#asURI, Node#asVariable

2019-03-25 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #547: JENA-1688: add methods Node#asBlank, Node#asConcret, Node#asLiteral, Node#asURI, Node#asVariable URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/547#issuecomment-476405301 This seem related to PR#546 and the discussion on

[GitHub] [jena] afs edited a comment on issue #548: JENA-1689: change type of Polyadic#m_subGraphs from List to Set

2019-03-25 Thread GitBox
afs edited a comment on issue #548: JENA-1689: change type of Polyadic#m_subGraphs from List to Set URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/548#issuecomment-476404449 What is the performance issue? Is it because a graph is added two or more times? MultiUnion.addGraph suppresses

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #548: JENA-1689: change type of Polyadic#m_subGraphs from List to Set

2019-03-25 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #548: JENA-1689: change type of Polyadic#m_subGraphs from List to Set URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/548#issuecomment-476404449 What is the performance issue? Is itbecause a graph is added two or more times? MultiUnion.addGraph suppresses duplicate

[GitHub] [jena] jmkeil commented on issue #547: JENA-1688: add methods Node#asBlank, Node#asConcret, Node#asLiteral, Node#asURI, Node#asVariable

2019-03-26 Thread GitBox
jmkeil commented on issue #547: JENA-1688: add methods Node#asBlank, Node#asConcret, Node#asLiteral, Node#asURI, Node#asVariable URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/547#issuecomment-476504397 Yes. This is an automated

[GitHub] [jena] jmkeil closed pull request #548: JENA-1689: change type of Polyadic#m_subGraphs from List to Set

2019-03-26 Thread GitBox
jmkeil closed pull request #548: JENA-1689: change type of Polyadic#m_subGraphs from List to Set URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/548 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [jena] jmkeil commented on issue #548: JENA-1689: change type of Polyadic#m_subGraphs from List to Set

2019-03-26 Thread GitBox
jmkeil commented on issue #548: JENA-1689: change type of Polyadic#m_subGraphs from List to Set URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/548#issuecomment-476504576 You are right. Sorry. This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] [jena] jmkeil closed pull request #547: JENA-1688: add methods Node#asBlank, Node#asConcret, Node#asLiteral, Node#asURI, Node#asVariable

2019-03-26 Thread GitBox
jmkeil closed pull request #547: JENA-1688: add methods Node#asBlank, Node#asConcret, Node#asLiteral, Node#asURI, Node#asVariable URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/547 This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-03-21 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#discussion_r267706457 ## File path: jena-text/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/query/text/TextIndexLucene.java ## @@ -401,25 +402,38 @@

[GitHub] [jena] xristy commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-03-22 Thread GitBox
xristy commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-475756380 Thanks for patience w/ my lack of response - slammed is all I can say. In any event, I agree with Osma’s comments. After the merge, then we

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #551: JENA-1699: Clear deleted prefix from the abbreviation map

2019-04-03 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #551: JENA-1699: Clear deleted prefix from the abbreviation map URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/551 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [jena] rvesse commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-04-04 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-479810329 Merged, thanks again for the contribution If you have chance to update the docs to mention this new capability that would also be great -

[GitHub] [jena] rvesse merged pull request #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-04-04 Thread GitBox
rvesse merged pull request #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-04 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-479940586 :+1: thanks @afs I've removed the new extras module. I made the Prometheus provider the default for now - I think we may as well

[GitHub] [jena] afs edited a comment on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-04 Thread GitBox
afs edited a comment on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-479922355 Licensing @claudew - would you be able to help out with the L issues here? The LICENSE and NOTICE for the combined

[GitHub] [jena] claudew commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-04 Thread GitBox
claudew commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-479935807 @afs I think you meant @claudenw (Claude Warren), not @claudew (Claude Whitmyer).

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-04 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-479937698 @claudew - yes, sorry. @Claudenw - would you be able to help out with the L issues here?

[GitHub] [jena] seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-04 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-479907207 @afs - w.r.t. licenses for `HdrHistogram` and `LatencyUtils` - what's involved there? Downloading and copying in the `LICENCE` files from

[GitHub] [jena] afs edited a comment on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-04 Thread GitBox
afs edited a comment on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-479922355 Licensing @claudenw - would you be able to help out with the L issues here? The LICENSE and NOTICE for the combined

[GitHub] [jena] rvesse commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-04-04 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-479984285 @DamienFontaine Thanks, doc changes added and visible on the staging site - http://jena.staging.apache.org/documentation/query/text-query.html

[GitHub] [jena] seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-05 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480177187 I've added a very basic test @afs This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-05 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#discussion_r272574084 ## File path:

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-05 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#discussion_r272572323 ## File path: jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-webapp/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/TestMetrics.java ## @@

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-05 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#discussion_r272513825 ## File path: jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/metrics/SimpleMetricsProvider.java

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-05 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480213481 One test goes a long way! This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [jena] seaninryan commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-05 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#discussion_r272536407 ## File path:

[GitHub] [jena] Claudenw commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-05 Thread GitBox
Claudenw commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480343725 I think we only need to add the licenses (there may be only one) to the META-INF folder. We could do this by just copying the file(s) or

[GitHub] [jena] seaninryan commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-05 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#discussion_r272587966 ## File path:

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-05 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480372154 > Does this only go into the fuseki war @Claudenw There are three binary artifacts.

[GitHub] [jena] Claudenw commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-06 Thread GitBox
Claudenw commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480515318 I was goingto add the licensing information but discovered that the HdrHistogram and LatencyUtils are both licensed under creative commons

[GitHub] [jena] Claudenw commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-06 Thread GitBox
Claudenw commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480519092 I can not find a straight text version of https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode so perhaps we should just provide

[GitHub] [jena] seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-04 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-47270 Sorted the 501 thing... will look at the tests tomorrow This is an

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java

2019-03-28 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/549#discussion_r269946739 ## File path: pom.xml ## @@ -57,11 +57,15 @@ 0.10.0

[GitHub] [jena] ajs6f commented on a change in pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java

2019-03-28 Thread GitBox
ajs6f commented on a change in pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/549#discussion_r270034237 ## File path: pom.xml ## @@ -57,11 +57,15 @@ 0.10.0

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java

2019-03-28 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/549 Expicit control the version of jackson.core so we can pick ones with security fixes.

[GitHub] [jena] rvesse commented on a change in pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java

2019-03-28 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on a change in pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/549#discussion_r269945012 ## File path: pom.xml ## @@ -57,11 +57,15 @@ 0.10.0

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-03-30 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-478237677 Hi all - where are we on this PR? If there are some approvals from @xristy / @osma / other Jena committers, I can go the merge.

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #550: Updates for libthrift and commons-compress

2019-03-30 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #550: Updates for libthrift and commons-compress URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/550 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] xristy commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-03-30 Thread GitBox
xristy commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-478257773 The switch seems not correct yet: > case "AnalyzingQueryParser": > if (qp == null) qp = new

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #550: Updates for libthrift and commons-compress

2019-03-29 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #550: Updates for libthrift and commons-compress URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/550 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [jena] rvesse commented on a change in pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java

2019-03-28 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on a change in pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/549#discussion_r269945012 ## File path: pom.xml ## @@ -57,11 +57,15 @@ 0.10.0

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on a change in pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java

2019-03-28 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/549#discussion_r270059867 ## File path: pom.xml ## @@ -57,11 +57,15 @@ 0.10.0

[GitHub] [jena] seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-03-28 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-477652161 Thanks @afs great feedback. These all make sense I think - I'll start working through them

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java

2019-03-29 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #549: JENA-1696: Control of jackson versions. Update jsonld-java URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/549 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [jena] xristy commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-04-01 Thread GitBox
xristy commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-478621634 I also had second thoughts about the needless instantiation and almost edited the previous as follows: ```java private Query

[GitHub] [jena] osma commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-04-01 Thread GitBox
osma commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-478627458 Either version is fine. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.

[GitHub] [jena] osma commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-04-01 Thread GitBox
osma commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-478569188 I still don't get the `switch` block. The control flow seems just...messy, with all the `if` checks and sometimes implicitly falling through to the

[GitHub] [jena] xristy commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-04-01 Thread GitBox
xristy commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-478607770 @osma cleaner, and I thought it was a good idea to alert users that they are using a deprecated query parser if they refer to

[GitHub] [jena] osma commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-04-01 Thread GitBox
osma commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-478613166 I'm okay with @xristy's version, although QueryParser is needlessly instantiated in some cases. But I'd choose clear code over premature

[GitHub] [jena] Claudenw commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-08 Thread GitBox
Claudenw commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480739946 After reviewing the licensing documentation in the libraries and Apache's policy on public domain licenses (

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-08 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480751661 It is a ASF policy that NOTICE is minimal. This is to avoid simply passing the problems onto downstream consumers, because NOTICE is legal

[GitHub] [jena] afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-04-07 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-480602750 A link in LICENSE is better and acceptable these days. HdrHistogram and LatencyUtils binaries artifacts themselves don't include a LICENSE or

[GitHub] seaninryan commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-02-25 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on a change in pull request #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#discussion_r259990280 ## File path: jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/ctl/ActionPrometheus.java

[GitHub] seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-02-25 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-467156265 I changed what I'd done to use micrometer.. the creation of the required objects is a bit tricky so for now I've just done it in the

[GitHub] DamienFontaine commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-02-25 Thread GitBox
DamienFontaine commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-467100377 @osma Yes, the SurroundQueryParser doesn't implement org.apache.lucene.queryparser.classic.QueryParser but all parsers can return a

[GitHub] afs opened a new pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-02-28 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537 [JENA-1676](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1676) : TDB1

[GitHub] afs commented on issue #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-02-28 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#issuecomment-468435652 The normal processing of transactions is not affected by this PR, except that there is code rewrite. What

[GitHub] seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-02-27 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-467941793 Hi all I think I've got this to somewhere decent now - I've got a core dependency on `micrometer-core` and have add a module in

[GitHub] rvesse commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-01 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#discussion_r261561114 ## File path:

[GitHub] rvesse commented on issue #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-01 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on issue #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#issuecomment-468629410 NB - For other reviewers ignoring whitespace changes in the diff view eliminating a bunch of non-changes

[GitHub] rvesse commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-01 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#discussion_r261562315 ## File path:

[GitHub] rvesse commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-01 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#discussion_r261561694 ## File path:

[GitHub] rvesse commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-01 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#discussion_r261561015 ## File path:

[GitHub] afs commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-01 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#discussion_r261577353 ## File path:

[GitHub] afs commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-01 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#discussion_r261577326 ## File path: jena-tdb/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/tdb/transaction/Transaction.java

[GitHub] afs commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-01 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#discussion_r261706207 ## File path:

[GitHub] afs commented on issue #538: JENA-1678 : Update version of sjf4j

2019-03-02 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #538: JENA-1678 : Update version of sjf4j URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/538#issuecomment-468961853 For CVE-2018-8088. While Jena does not use this feature of slf4j, it helps if the jar dependencies can be kept CVE-clean to assist users in

[GitHub] afs merged pull request #538: JENA-1678 : Update version of sjf4j

2019-03-02 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #538: JENA-1678 : Update version of sjf4j URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/538 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[GitHub] afs opened a new pull request #538: JENA-1678 : Update version of sjf4j

2019-03-02 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #538: JENA-1678 : Update version of sjf4j URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/538 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-02-21 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-466044561 micrometer.io looks interesting. Have I understood micrometer correctly? The Fuseki counters/stats/... implement in the micrometer

[GitHub] DamienFontaine opened a new pull request #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-02-21 Thread GitBox
DamienFontaine opened a new pull request #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536 PR to add [SurroundQueryParser ](https://lucene.apache.org/core/7_1_0/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/surround/parser/QueryParser.html) in

[GitHub] ajs6f commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-02-21 Thread GitBox
ajs6f commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-466045612 It is like Dexx in that it is persistent (aka functional) collections library, and it is not like Dexx in that Dexx intends to exclusively port

[GitHub] ajs6f commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-02-21 Thread GitBox
ajs6f commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-466077065 Yep, [looks like](https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@jena.apache.org:gte=1d:pcollections) we did look at PCollections, and the performance

[GitHub] afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-02-21 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-466159232 Yes - we have to allow "bring their own" adapter, and may provide one specific one (our own simple custom one?). Is there any work around

[GitHub] ajs6f commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-02-20 Thread GitBox
ajs6f commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-465644411 Ok, cool. Given the small amount of code here, I don't really have any problem with supporting one particular framework (especially since I

[GitHub] seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-02-20 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-465642833 I'm not 100% sure @ajs6f - but I think that it probably is a propriety Prometheus format. It's described

[GitHub] ajs6f commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-02-20 Thread GitBox
ajs6f commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-465620789 Is this endpoint usable by software other than Prometheus? I mean to ask; are there other monitoring suites that could accept this data or would

[GitHub] grahamtriggs commented on issue #533: Feature/sdborder

2019-02-20 Thread GitBox
grahamtriggs commented on issue #533: Feature/sdborder URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/533#issuecomment-465710002 @afs Ooops! I've added the Apache header to both of those files. This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] afs merged pull request #535: JENA-1674: Don't sign extend Float.floatToIntBits.

2019-02-22 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #535: JENA-1674: Don't sign extend Float.floatToIntBits. URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/535 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] rvesse commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-02-22 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-466525608 Pinging @osma @xristy Not that it's a blocker for this PR but anytime I see this kind of code pattern in Jena (and Java in general) I

[GitHub] [jena] seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-03-05 Thread GitBox
seaninryan commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-469688552 Thanks for looking @afs :+1: I'm not 100% clear on how all the packaging works. Be great if you can fire it up next week and let me

[GitHub] afs opened a new pull request #539: Comments cleanup; remove unused functions.

2019-03-03 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #539: Comments cleanup; remove unused functions. URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/539 This PR is clean up that have accumulated on some of my local branches: - add some javadoc on test classes - miscellaneous comment typos - rename a test

[GitHub] afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint

2019-03-03 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #534: [WIP] Proof of concept for prometheus endpoint URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-469011478 This is looking very interesting! I'll look at the servlet when I'm at my development machine (not this coming week). There are already

[GitHub] afs commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-01 Thread GitBox
afs commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#discussion_r261578115 ## File path:

[GitHub] rvesse commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-01 Thread GitBox
rvesse commented on a change in pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537#discussion_r261641027 ## File path:

[GitHub] osma commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text

2019-02-25 Thread GitBox
osma commented on issue #536: Add support SurroundQueryParser to jena-text URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/536#issuecomment-467075475 I think it's a pity this PR merges the two methods into one, making the code a bit messier and more difficult to understand. Is that because

[GitHub] afs merged pull request #533: Feature/sdborder

2019-02-20 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #533: Feature/sdborder URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/533 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] afs opened a new pull request #535: JENA-1674: Don't sign extend Float.floatToIntBits.

2019-02-20 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #535: JENA-1674: Don't sign extend Float.floatToIntBits. URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/535 Add TestFloatNode for value-based testing of FloatNode. Use canonical NaN for packing Double.NaN.

[GitHub] afs commented on issue #535: JENA-1674: Don't sign extend Float.floatToIntBits.

2019-02-20 Thread GitBox
afs commented on issue #535: JENA-1674: Don't sign extend Float.floatToIntBits. URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/535#issuecomment-465788847 Sorry @rvesse - discovered I'd been running the wrong test suite and the original PR was not passing. Caught thanks to TravisCI. The only

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #542: JENA-1682: Update Apache fileupload version

2019-03-14 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #542: JENA-1682: Update Apache fileupload version URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/542 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #540: JENA-1680: Code formatting jena-dboe-*

2019-03-13 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #540: JENA-1680: Code formatting jena-dboe-* URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/540 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #541: JENA-1679: EBV values for NaN (double and float)

2019-03-13 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #541: JENA-1679: EBV values for NaN (double and float) URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/541 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #542: JENA-1682: Update Apache fileupload version

2019-03-13 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #542: JENA-1682: Update Apache fileupload version URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/542 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #540: JENA-1680: Code formatting jena-dboe-*

2019-03-11 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #540: JENA-1680: Code formatting jena-dboe-* URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/540 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] afs opened a new pull request #541: JENA-1679: EBV values for Nan (double and float)

2019-03-11 Thread GitBox
afs opened a new pull request #541: JENA-1679: EBV values for Nan (double and float) URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/541 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #539: Comments cleanup; remove unused functions.

2019-03-07 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #539: Comments cleanup; remove unused functions. URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/539 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [jena] afs merged pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors

2019-03-08 Thread GitBox
afs merged pull request #537: JENA-1676 , JENA-1677: Make the commit step more robust against external factors URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/537 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >