I asked this on Apache legal list but got no reply. So, I thought I'll
try again for the group it will affect directly (project not mentioned
below is Solr).
Any opinion on legality, usefulness or possibly underlying causes of
the original problem would be appreciated.
Regards,
Alex.
...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 3/6/2014 8:42 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
I asked this on Apache legal list but got no reply. So, I thought I'll
try again for the group it will affect directly (project not mentioned
below is Solr).
Any opinion on legality, usefulness or possibly underlying
I was doing some searching on issues and noticed 4.7 is listed in
Unreleased versions. Also, I have a couple of open issues that
(possibly due to my mistake) are marked as open but target at 4.7.
Was not sure if this is a process that normally lags the actual
version release or something to
Do you mean like:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_6_1/solr-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory.html
?
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/lucene_solr_4_7_0/solr/example/example-schemaless/solr/collection1/conf/solrconfig.xml#L1570
Regards,
Alex.
What does it take to be a mentor? I have a couple of Solr ideas I
would be happy to mentor someone on. But do mentors have to sign
agreements, be part of Apache formally, etc?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn:
what I _thought_ I remembered!
It looks like I found all the extends for UpdateProcessorFactory, but
didn't follow the chain through FieldMutatingUpdateProcessorFactory
which would have found that one for me.
Siiihhh.
Thanks again,
Erick
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Alexandre
outline
of what's there similar to the Analyzers and Tokenizers page If
I find the time... Siigggh.
Erick
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
That chain issue is exactly why I built the web page above. That,
plus the Javadoc links all over
And I think I missed the dates too anyway.
Oh well, maybe I can get into that position for next year. Something
to target (committer status and all). :-)
Thanks,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the
Hello,
I am thinking of new interfaces to compose analyzer chains. And I
already have all the valid analyzers/tokenizers/filters/etc (
http://www.solr-start.com/info/analyzers/ ).
But I just realized that I also need the parameters that actually
define the behavior. Normally, they are defined in
Hello,
On the following page, there is a Javadoc link that redirects to 404:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#EventListeners
The link is:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/handler/dataimport/EventListener.html
It redirects (incorrectly) to:
that I'm not aware of.
Anyone have any other ideas?
Cassandra
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
On the following page, there is a Javadoc link that redirects to 404:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#EventListeners
+1 on consolidating to the Reference Guide and figuring out the way to
make wiki a lot less visible. But for a completely different set of
reasons than discussed already.
[[rant-start]]
I think an interesting side-effect issue here is user perception. I
feel that ElasticSearch (yet, them) get a
Hello,
I am looking at Solr JMX UI (In Web Admin) and I notice that the
source code links are pointing at the source code under the 4.7
branch.
Except I am running 4.7.1, so this is both confusing and somewhat
misleading if the user is actually trying to troubleshooting source
code.
Should the
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
While I somewhat agree with both the points of Furkan and Alexandre, I am
not sure which way you are leaning:
If somebody had time/money/permission, that's what I would do
1. Migrate wiki to an archive area in bulk and
Follow-up in-line.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
2. Mark it as Google non-crawlable
Right. Now I just need to become a committer. :-)
Regards,
Alex
On 07/04/2014 8:01 pm, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Apr 6, 2014, at 11:35 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com
wrote:
7. Setup proper analytics (is there any?), so we could at least tell
what
Let's hope nobody is trying to finish any books right now. :-)
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr proficiency
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to both 4.7.3 and
I don't normally repost to the mailng lists, but this is better than
my own attempts :-)
http://words.steveklabnik.com/how-to-be-an-open-source-gardener
I would be curious to know how this topic applies to Lucene/Solr. I
have a feeling that the old-timers have a particular
Hello,
I am curious what the legal reason for bundling all the .sha and
license files (plus the NOTICE.txt plus the LICENSE.txt)? I am looking
at ElasticSearch by comparison and they have only one.
Even when they download something like Tika as a plugin, they do not
seem download the license
Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch [mailto:arafa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 1:57 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Why does Solr bundle all the licences
Hello,
I am curious what the legal reason
.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch [mailto:arafa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:08 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why does Solr bundle all the licences
Even
I've read a couple of times now that Jetty/Tomcat/Container is going
away in Solr 5.
Can somebody tell me where to check the detailed discussion about
that. Is that a mailing list thread? A JIRA? Something else?
I found SOLR-5091, but it does not feel quite right.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal
Hello,
The binary Solr distribution includes Javadoc, but it just sits there.
I just tested adding second Jetty context that makes that Javadoc
served under /javadoc handle.
I think it is useful as sometimes Javadoc breaks when it is loaded
from local filesystem (I think), plus it opens up
, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
The binary Solr distribution includes Javadoc, but it just sits there.
I just tested adding second Jetty context that makes that Javadoc
served under /javadoc handle.
I think it is useful as sometimes Javadoc breaks when
Have you looked at commercial offerings? At some point, it becomes an
ROI issue. If it is becoming such a serious issue:
http://www.basistech.com/text-analytics/rosette/base-linguistics/asian-languages/
Regards,
Alex.
P.s. This is a link, not a recommendation. I haven't tested either
their
I think there was a discussion/JIRA on moving to AngularJS (or
ReactJS?). Maybe this should be a part of that discussion.
What is the process for discussion UI? Was this a heroic effort by
one/two individual or was there a subgroup of some sort?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website:
Can you have a custom UpdateRequestProcessor in the chain that just
skips processing such requests?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr proficiency
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Furkan KAMACI
Hi,
I would like to (re-)initiate a discussion about Solr support for
plugin life-cycle (publish, discover, download, dependency
management). Triggered by a discussion on the Solr mailing list:
http://search-lucene.com/m/QTPaIv50e1subj=Re+Contribute+QParserPlugin
My main points:
1)
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/28/2014 10:01 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
5) Solr, frankly, is getting rather pudgy. Or possibly beyond mere
pudgy. This is becoming especially noticeable by comparison with
ElasticSearch but also
I guess, there are two questions there:
1) Does SOLR allocate memory based on requested rows (not actual one)?
2) Is there a way to get all the records?
For the second question, would paging with deep-paging support (added
in 4.8) solve the problem in the meantime? Or is use-case more
specific
I think Solr 5 should be a modularized deploy with plugins and plugin
registry. Either that or we will have to steal the Elephant logo from
the sister project and have to setup torrent-based software
distribution.
And I really wish HUE was a Java-based project. But, alas,
Regards,
Alex.
How about a warning section in Admin UI that shows possible issues
with the configuration.
Could start with something absolutely basic like missing default field
(we can detect that from configuration, right?) but I am sure there
are other issues we could think of.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal
Hello,
I had a preliminary look around and it might be possible to plug
Morphline (already shipped with Solr) into DIH by creating a bridging
EntityProcessor.
Two questions:
1) Do people see value in it?
2) DIH is not very supported, so any addition seems to be a bit stuck
in rickety bridge,
Solr proficiency
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not know much about morphlines but I'd like to know what use-cases
would be possible/easier/faster with such an integration?
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa
consider DIH a solid foundation or a
weak link in Solr that desperately needs firming up.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 1:40 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding Morphline support to DIH - worth the effort
Message- From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 10:16 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding Morphline support to DIH - worth the effort?
I see DIH as something that offers a quick way to get things done, as
long as they fit into DIH's couple of basic scenarios
-Original Message- From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Sunday, June 8, 2014 1:40 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adding Morphline support to DIH - worth the effort?
Well, it's the same core scenario as DIH supports (apart from actual
data sources), but actively supported
I have only two resources on this (both for Magento):
*) http://www.magentocommerce.com/magento-connect/solr-bridge-search.html
*) http://inchoo.net/ecommerce/install-apache-solr/ (has links in the comments)
Regards,
Alex
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and
On 19 November 2014 13:21, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
I *do* think it might be a good idea for us to write and maintain
supported Solr clients for languages beyond Java
I believe this has been announced as one of the focus items at the
Lucene/Solr Revolution. Including the call to
Are you sure that's not something that's already addressed by the ICU
Filter?
http://www.solr-start.com/javadoc/solr-lucene/org/apache/lucene/analysis/icu/ICUTransformFilterFactory.html
If you follow the links to what's possible, the page talks about
Greek, though not ancient:
Hi,
I am writing something that - will - depend on Solr 5. As I usually
work with released versions, I am not entirely sure of the correct
workflow.
I can check out branch_5x and do my research against that. I assume
that's the correct source for what will land in version 5.
But if I find an
On 21 November 2014 16:10, paolo anghileri
paolo.anghil...@codegeneration.it wrote:
The need is being able to search with simple strings without grammatical
details and retrieve data with grammatical details.
I am pretty sure that this is what I did for a Thai dome. Actually, I
went another two
as possible.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 3:36 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Testing Solr 5
On 11/21/2014 1:14 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
I am writing something that - will - depend on Solr 5. As I usually
Hello,
I can't find a relevant Jira/discussion space if this exists. I
strongly feel that the basic example is still far from basic and
there needs to be a subgroup of people discussing of what can be
cut-off to demonstrate a true minimal configuration.
I am happy to take a lead on that if
://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
On 22 November 2014 at 17:06, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 11/22/2014 10:41 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
I can't find a relevant Jira/discussion space if this exists. I
strongly feel that the basic example is still far from basic
So, I think I found a bug in Solr 5 build:
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/schemaless/select?indent=trueechoParams=all;
- returns echoParams twice.
So, how do I debug it? Enable remote debugging on Jetty and trace it
through the 1024 levels of indirections? Grab a specific test case
(which one?)
Well, a start would be to actually have an up-to-date list of Solr
clients. I have the list, if somebody knows where it should go (Ref
Guide). I don't want to contribute this to WIKI as we are trying to
get rid of it.
Then somebody (Summer of Code project?) would derive from that a list
of
Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, a start would be to actually have an up-to-date list of Solr
clients. I have the list, if somebody knows where it should go
community
driven since things change so quickly.
Eric
On Nov 24, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well, a start would be to actually have an up-to-date list of Solr
clients. I have the list, if somebody knows where it should go (Ref
Guide). I don't want
On 24 November 2014 at 10:56, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
It's certainly something of a challenge when you're totally unfamiliar with
the
relevant code. And then the next one you tackle means you start the process
all over again ;).
That does not bode well, since I am
With Git and GitHub it is possible to do a shallow fetch which will
only get the files without much history. Maybe with SVN as well, but I
haven't tried.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and
On 1 December 2014 at 09:51, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
I once asked the SolrNET developers if they would like to move their effort
to Apache and become a certified client library, but the response was
lukewarm.
On 1 December 2014 at 10:02, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
I meant to reply earlier...
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
They are super-stale
Yup but it’s a wiki so feel free to freshen it up. I’ll be doing
...@opensourceconnections.com wrote:
I think in the vein of a “do-it-tocracy”, getting the Wiki updated is a
perfectly good first step, and then if there is a better approach, hopefully
that occurs.… ;-)
On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 1 December 2014
!
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
What would be the reasonable cutoff for the client library last
update? Say if it was not updated
A tangent, but a relevant one (to the issue of speed). Have you tried
running the tests with Lucene/Solr code being in the RAM disk?
I found that compiling source on RAMDisk is a lot faster than even
with SSD drive. Must be just frequency of access. It might be the same
with tests.
Regards,
?
Eric
On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:23 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ok,
Done: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/IntegratingSolr
Also: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolPython
I am not sure what to do with the stuff at the bottom of the client
list, though I've put the dates
On 2 December 2014 at 18:10, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
The test dependency tree for this particular class is *EXTENSIVE* and
not very easy to track down.
How about a black box approach? Run each test individually once with a
debugging interface enabled and the code that records
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Wolfgang Hoschek whosc...@cloudera.com wrote:
On Hadoop, even the JDBC/SQL portion of DIH now seems mostly covered by a
combination of Sqoop and MapReduceIndexerTool, and perhaps a bit of Hive.
I appreciate that if you are in the Big Data space, you already
I've had an example in my book:
https://github.com/arafalov/solr-indexing-book/blob/master/published/languages/conf/solrconfig.xml
, though it was for Solr 4.2+. Solr in Action also has a section on
multilingual indexing. There is no generic advice, as everybody seems
to have slightly different
Hello,
I am interested in creating and running Solr analyzer chains outside
of normal process (no live Solr). Just construct a chain, feed it
tokens and see what happens.
I would appreciate any hints on what that takes and whether there are
any hidden/weird dependencies (e.g. for resource
wrote:
Tracing through indexing or query parsing is... a challenge. Start with
something simpler like the analysis admin API.
See:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_9_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/handler/FieldAnalysisRequestHandler.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Alexandre
at 6:59 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in creating and running Solr analyzer chains outside
of normal process (no live Solr). Just construct a chain, feed it
tokens and see what happens.
I would appreciate any hints on what that takes
.
Of course _you're_ the one doing the work, so whatever you think best.
Erick
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't want to read the schema.xml, but I do want to create factories
using the same parameters they use in schema. So
Hello,
What is the logic/benefit of shipping test framework with Solr
distribution? Is something actually using it outside of build/test
cycle?
It's 12Mb of libraries and documentations.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources:
: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
On 3 December 2014 at 01:14, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 12/2/2014 10:53 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
A tangent, but a relevant one (to the issue of speed). Have you tried
running the tests with Lucene/Solr code being in the RAM disk
://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 on merging those two. But also needs a bit of a 'design' of what
goes into it. I have probably another 30 links of various Solr-related
products.
I didn't touch SolrPython
Hi,
I want to do some minor cleanup in (multiple) schema.xml. What's the
minimum set of tests I need to run before I submit a patch?
'ant test' seems to be a heavy thing. Is there a way to say, just
schema-related ones?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I want to do some minor cleanup in (multiple) schema.xml. What's the
minimum set of tests I need to run before I submit a patch?
'ant test' seems
Hi Michael,
Awesome to see you are still working on that tool. It's enough outside
of the box, I can see it can cause other people without context to
become confused. But I think we will learn something from it, whether
it will ultimately work perfectly or not.
On the specific question: I was
How are we doing the feedback? On the list? On the page in comments?
Before looking too hard at the links (will later):
1) If we are talking about solrconfig.xml - there are now general
properties that apply to multiple update handlers at once. And
multiple of them may do that in order of the
I just found that DIH and techproducts examples ship with scripts.conf
file in the conf directory (4.x, 5 and trunk).
It does not seem to be used at all anywhere in the packaged version.
The only mention I seem to find is in the scripts-util in the _source_
directory where it is used as some
Any reason it's Lucene directly and not Solr or ElasticSearch? Here is
an example with Solr, Spring Data and Select2:
https://github.com/arafalov/Solr-Javadoc/tree/master/SearchServer (the
first version was built from scratch in 3 hours).
Regards,
Alex.
Personal:
popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
On 1 October 2014 12:18, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
https://github.com/arafalov/Solr-Javadoc/tree/master
Hello,
Google Summery of Code 2015 has been announced.
https://developers.google.com/open-source/soc/
I know it is quite far away, but I also seem to remember that last
time we did not use it to as much advantage as possible.
Is there some sort of organized effort around it for this year? I
On 9 October 2014 13:39, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
What happens is explained here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6188?focusedCommentId=14039350page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14039350
Is this one of the things that Solr 5
That's interesting. I did not realize we were going away from
ElasticSearch on that.
So, do we need to update the tutorial or some other super-obvious way
of what the next step is? (I haven't checked). Because one difference
between Solr and the Database is that create table is a standard SQL
Hi,
I am trying to understand what used to be in Solr pre-merge and got
moved into Lucene packages after the projects merged. For example
analyzers/tokenizers, were they always in Lucene or all originally in
Solr?
I am not sure where to check this quickly, so I am hoping people can
do a short
on this subject,
more or less:
http://heliosearch.org/lucene-solr-history/
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am trying
May I suggest the next time they do it, they mention event date and location :-)
It's 31st of January/1st Feb, Brussels if I found the right web page.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
Hello,
I found two JIRAs I was interested in marked as merged in 4.x branch
(SOLR-5097 and SOLR-5098). Got excited and then discovered they were
merged after 4.10 and the info added to the 4.11 README section.
Does it mean there _will_ be a Solr 4.11? I thought the discussion was
that 4.10.x was
On 13 October 2014 10:37, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
Now... I'll have to admit that maybe there might be clarity among the Lucene
dev/user crowd, but mostly I'm referring to the Solr user crowd, who aren't
up on Lucene internals.
I do admit having troubles envisioning the
On 13 October 2014 15:27, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Point is (at least on my part) - *our* (this community's) major releases are
mostly about index backwards compatibility support.
This is really interesting. I've read a lot of material on Solr and
some on Lucene and I never saw the
On 15 October 2014 21:24, Yonik Seeley yo...@heliosearch.com wrote:
I imagine Heliosearch will stick with the 4.10 branch for a little while
I always thought the fun part about running my own company would be
not needing to say I imagine X will happen and just being able to
decisively say X
What happened with 4.10.3? There seem to be a downloadable on the
download archives, but the home page download link still talks about
4.10.2.
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
On 15 December 2014 at 20:39, Mark Miller
I would do the following on the Solr's notes top:
1) Usability improvements
2) Distributed IDF
3) No war (though we do ship one anyway)
4) SolrJ support for collection
5) Stats component
6) New handlers/API all together as a block
The rest.
Just a weak opinion though.
Regards,
Alex.
I think you just need to check out the right branch. You definitely
got the trunk there somehow. I'd start from scratch and make sure you
are using SVN to check out the right branch from SVN (not GitHub).
There is a read-only access point.
That's what I am doing for 5.0 build and it's working.
Hi,
Just saw a link to http://www.shellcheck.net/ .
I run Solr start script and it picked up a couple of interesting
issues around variable escaping and deprecated shell commands.
Is that something that's worth making JIRA about?
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter
It's very unlikely that you have exactly the same problem. There are
too many unusual pieces in there. Could you perhaps ignore that email
and restate your problem.
Please include:
*) Solr version
*) SolrJ version, if different
*) Exception stack trace
*) Do you actually have a proxy in a middle
Could we make sure to fix SOLR-6960, please! Otherwise, Solr is
basically lying about its configuration OOTB.
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
On 17 January 2015 at 13:36, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote:
Thanks Noble. I'm
. I'll
deal with certificates later.
Thanks again,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
On 14 January 2015 at 01:18, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 1/13/2015 10:37 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
This hasn't happened to me before
Why can't it be just a Solr search against the collection of titles
(and counts)? It will manage all the approximate matches and ranking
for you, you just need to tell it the rules (e.g. with mm parameter).
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at
I wonder if the people who are using dynamic schema care about having
the fields indexed without _them_ doing pre-processing, but don't mind
if they have to use cleaned-up names during search. Like, when you
index from Tika and you just have no clue what possible metadata names
are in various
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6824
Still not fixed, I guess.
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
On 10 January 2015 at 17:50, Jack Krupansky jack.krupan...@gmail.com wrote:
On this page:
certificate.
I checked the certificate on the site and switched back to using https and it
seems to be fine now...
Regards,
Luc
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch [mailto:arafa...@gmail.com]
Sent: donderdag 8 januari 2015 6:32
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject
Hi,
I am trying to check if there are any documents in Solr but they are
not visible yet.
If there were no commit at all, I know I can see it in the stats for
UpdateHandler under @docsPending.
But if there was a hard commit with openSearcher=false (as per example
configuration), then that
+1 (If I get to vote :-) )
5.0 is looking like a lot bigger deal on the usability features than
when the original jump was discussed several months ago.
It would be nice to have users to actually try those features before
RC1 of Final. Which requires some articles to drive adoption, etc.
This hasn't happened to me before. Building (new) 5.0 branch:
package-src-tgz:
[exec] Error validating server certificate for
'https://svn.apache.org:443':
[exec] - The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the
[exec]fingerprint to validate the certificate
On 13 January 2015 at 18:50, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
once the segment is committe written to desk, w/o a reopen on the
searcher, there isn't any object in Solr/Lucene keeping a record of hte
number of docs in that segment - something would need to open that segment
to
Do you mean, svn_5x is now 5.1? Trunk is 6, right.
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
On 13 January 2015 at 21:48, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote:
Also, I forgot to mention, the version# has been bumped on 5x and trunk to
1 - 100 of 1699 matches
Mail list logo
