Congratulations Ilan!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 5:44 AM Noble Paul wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Ilan Ginzburg as the latest Lucene/Solr
> committer.
> Ilan, it's tr
ed voting"
>> >
>> > I considered rank voting, but tallying a rank vote by hand can be
>> incredibly tedious. I don't think we should use any external tools since
>> that prohibits verification on who is voting from the PMC. However, given
>> the
Speaking of backing up ZK, are people doing this now for Solr and can
information be shared on the approach? I'm aware of scripts/code out there
that can save ZK's contents to local disk and reconstitute back to ZK,
perhaps at another cluster and/or chroot. But I'm not aware of what issues
there
n
>>> a very old Ant Maven plugin?
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:43 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi David,
>>> > It may be unrelated, but I was similarly puzzled when all h
If we're going to have more options, I suggest we use "ranked voting":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting
If you create a Google Form based submission which supports a ranked choice
input, then this should make it probably not hard to tally the results
correctly. A PMC boolean would be
+1 Thanks for volunteering Bruno!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:31 AM Bruno Roustant
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It’s been a while since we released Lucene/Solr 8.5.
> I’d like to volunteer to be a rel
+1 thanks
~ David
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:11 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Short form:
>
> In a week or so, I propose to start failing compilations on master for
> compiler warnings (exclusive of deprecations). If you have a problem with
> that, speak up or hold your peace ;)
>
> Erick
>
C. The current Lucene logo [4]
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:08 PM Ryan Ernst wrote:
> Dear Lucene and Solr developers!
>
> In February a contest was started to design a new logo for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9170
> > Regards,
> > Ishan
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:59 AM David Smiley
> wrote:
> > No; it's another option for people who would rather use Maven instead of
> Ant. Where I work I've found it useful
, with at-mention to me so I can stay in
the loop.
Also, you might want your past JIRA identity / merged into your new
identity to avoid confusion. I had that done last year.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:05 AM
No; it's another option for people who would rather use Maven instead of
Ant. Where I work I've found it useful because it allows you to fork Solr
and push the artifacts (plus source & docs) to a company Maven repo. It
wasn't apparent to me how to do that in the Ant build. Also, it's
Welcome Maya!
~ David
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:58 PM jim ferenczi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Mayya Sharipova as the latest Lucene/Solr
> committer.
> Mayya, it's tradition for you to introduce yourself with a brief bio.
>
> Congratulations and Welcome!
>
> Jim
>
If we don't do opt-in (and there's plenty of people who seem to want
opt-out instead), then I propose we instead seek the board's input on how
to navigate these waters. The board is there to help with such things.
~ David
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 1:30 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
Jan,
That draft resolution is ambiguous as to what *role* the "members" are that
are listed. In this email thread here you ask for all committers. My
original understanding of that draft resolution was PMC only.
~ David
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:19 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Note: All
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:21 PM John Wang wrote:
> Thanks Adrien!
>
> It is surprising to learn this is an invalid use case and that Lucene is
> planning to get rid of memory accounting..
's all gray. Therefore, no one is better than anyone
> else."
> The Zetet: "Knowing only gray, you conclude that all grays are the
> same shade. You mock the simplicity of the two-color view, yet you replace
> it with a one-color view..."
> —Marc S
BTW I'm a bit concerned about a user reporting this past weekend on
solr-user reporting a 20x speed regression in the unified highlighter
introduced in 8.5 when the field is large with typical settings. There is
no issue created yet but I'm investigating.
~ David
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 3:03
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:32 PM Yuvraaj Kelkar wrote:
> @speed:
> I haven't delved into the actual ant build files, but from a cursory look
> at the CPU utilization during an ant task, should I assume that more cores
> = faster?
> If there's other information that you can share about how to make
?
~ David
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 2:21 AM David Smiley
wrote:
> Aha, thanks!
>
> It appear's the build's CPU detection is failing to see how many are
> actually available in the Crave environment. So I am manually upping it
> and I'm seeing much better build times, at least on
Also, I proposed this being added to our release process as well so that it
happens systemically, and so that issues referred to from any release are
more easily reachable.
~ David
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:38 AM Cassandra Targett
wrote:
> Yes, this is a known issue with Jira and the use of
s, use crave list .
> To kill background tasks use crave stop .
>
> Thanks,
> -Uv
>
> On May 20 2020, at 7:09 pm, David Smiley wrote:
>
> I don't know what Crave.io does should I, say, close my laptop and go to
> sleep and come back to it. If it could survive tha
I don't know what Crave.io does should I, say, close my laptop and go to
sleep and come back to it. If it could survive that somehow then that'd
be a sweet feature! I doubt my simple rsync script plays well with that so
I don't dare.
~ David
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:05 PM David Smiley
to help set up crave to build Lucene/Solr. I thought others
> in the community can benefit from it as well.
>
>
> [image: Sent from Mailspring]
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:40 AM David Smiley
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is pretty cool! It worked for me right away with
ot;Knowing only gray, you conclude that all grays are the
> same shade. You mock the simplicity of the two-color view, yet you replace
> it with a one-color view..."
> —Marc Stiegler, David's Sling
>
> --
> *From:* David Smiley
> *S
Hi,
This is pretty cool! It worked for me right away without issue. I have my
own similar rsync based script I've been using to build Lucene/Solr on
other machines/VM --
https://gist.github.com/dsmiley/fdd589758cd74009222c518640b093b5 It's
generous for crave.io to offer free build servers.
Hi,
There's a wiki page on this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/SpatialForTimeDurations
The first two paragraphs essentially cover it: use DateRangeField (even for
integers).
~ David
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 9:59 AM Ruscheinski, Johannes <
I don't have a direct answer for you, but your message causes me to reflect
on how Lucene does *not* give users choice of format on a per-type basis
(e.g. BinaryDocValues vs NumericDocValues vs etc.), which is annoying.
Ideally the previous simple format would be available for you to choose,
but
ParentBlockJoinQuery (and Child equivalent) use
0. Solr's Filter.java (formerly in Lucene), which I'm slowly removing,
chooses 0 as well.
Shall we standardize on a score of 1 for Lucene/Solr 9.0? Or 0? Or do
some queries break with the norm for a good reason?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr S
Yeah; I'm glad it seems it's fixed.
~ David
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:32 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Oh good, thanks for posting ‘cause I thought I’d screwed one up. Looks
> like it’s fixed now though?
>
> > On May 14, 2020, at 1:33 AM, David Smiley wrote:
> >
> > FY
FYI https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20253
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
+1 (binding)
~ David
e older binaries written before (or
>>> without) generics. But take a look at SolrQueryResponse for instance. We
>>> explicitly declare:
>>> >
>>> > protected NamedList values = new SimpleOrderedMap<>();
>>> >
>>> > but then decla
Can't we customize the linting to disregard entire categories of certain
warnings for now? This makes your task manageable.
https://discuss.gradle.org/t/recompile-with-xlint-parameters/25279
~ David
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:41 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> I’m really struggling with what to
I agree with Doug that the burden of proof is on keeping the codebases
together instead of the reverse. I liken it to a marriage; it has to work
well for both parties.It seems to be mostly beneficial for Solr but
much less so for Lucene.
BTW an even better example than the huge FuzzyQuery
I see it often; I raised this in slack a few weeks ago. Kevin & Mike Drob
responded. It seems "gw clean" makes it go away. Still, this is annoying
and points to a problem we should address.
~ David
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:40 AM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> I was doing quite a bit of building
Thanks for this report Jan! This is reminding me of a couple I was
involved with and I can take some action.
BTW it's normal to find some PRs without JIRA issues when the change is
minor, or maybe for other exploratory reasons.
~ David
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:18 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
Hi,
Please use the java-user list instead of dev list for Lucene help. Thanks.
~ David
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 3:36 AM Ivana Spasojevic <
ivanaspasojevic87...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I’m developing custom java application with lucene 8.5.0.
>
> I've tried to use
Thanks Ilan!
I especially love the lead section "Overseer: from queues to state" with
the diagram. Indeed, this is the documentation I (we?) wished already
existed. I'd like to try to ensure this part of the document is more
tightly associated with our project for others to see.
This is
) with a
constructor that indicates indexed/docValues.
I also agree with Michael Sokolov; it's crazy Lucene FieldInfos doesn't
have some basic numeric type metadata.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:15 AM Michael Sokolov
f
Solr in a package, 1st party, is separation of concerns. and better
classpath management.
I think it's "essential" that a UI ship with Solr by default -- meaning,
without the user having to take any additional steps whatsoever. As Jan
said it's been this way a long time.
~ David Smiley
out what some of the most
opinionated amongst us can accept.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 9:06 PM Marcus Eagan wrote:
>
> Gus,
>
> Your $.02 are worth a lot more than $.02 USD, so thank you.
>
I'd love to see that quilt!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 1:33 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe
wrote:
> Welcome Eric!
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 8:12 AM Houston Putman
> wrote:
>
>> Congrats Er
iks/Ericks to differentiate themselves.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:43 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congrats and welcome, David!
>
> (FYI, David Smiley told
Congratulations Eric!
I'm so glad to see you resuming contributing to Solr after a long hiatus.
Much appreciated!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:21 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Pleas
(Renamed; no other changes)
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Commit+Process+Guidelines
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:36 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> I could have *sworn* I r
Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:36 AM David Smiley
wrote:
> I've chosen Friday March 20th at 11am US eastern time, which is when
> everyone who responded to the Doodle poll said they could make it.
o this now
involves git:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-site/blob/master/content/pages/whoweare.md
However I am unfamiliar with the process of publishing. Jan or someone
else, can you advise us?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
-user mailing list
and has helped others through his blog posts and presentations about
search. We look forward to his future contributions.
Congratulations and welcome! It is a tradition to introduce yourself with
a brief bio, Alessandro.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http
Please ask on "solr-user" instead. The "dev" list is for internal
development.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:10 PM Nouman Zaheer
wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I am not sure if this
see room for improvement in Solr here. The core admin stats don't
actually need an IndexSearcher, it needs a DirectoryReader which is much
cheaper to get. Even SolrCore.getIndexSize creates/closes one on the fly.
I filed an issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14325
~ David Smiley
Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:27 PM David Smiley
wrote:
> Hello fellow committers,
>
> I'd like to organize another virtual Lucene/Solr committer meeting this
> month. I created a meeting notes page i
published for anyone to see (not restricted to those
invited). They will be transmitted to the dev list.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
Can I assume it's no big deal to post a solr-ref-guide documentation
improvement on the release branch irrespective of whenever you precisely do
the RC?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:15 AM Joel Bernstein
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8551
The main thing missing is that the stored fields data doesn't actually
store what IDs are being used (!). If that were in place, I could imagine
a CLI tool to purge the IDs.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http
was and report
that. Go to Solr's logs.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:01 PM Staley, Phil R - DCF <
phil.sta...@wisconsin.gov> wrote:
> We recently upgraded to our Drupal 8 sites to SOLR 8.3.1. We are now
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:36 AM Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> I definitely reviewed the email thread, replies, and Confluence wiki
> document. In my interpretation of the discussion, a few things stood out:
> - There were some synchronous discussions that occurred off the list,
> which can lead to
I suspect you might ask in the context of Solr? AFAIK I don't think Solr
takes advantage of any index sorting that might exist. Maybe Christine
knows; she added the configuration of index sorting to Solr --
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13681
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr
interested in exploring if their tools can help us put out the build
failure fires -- e.g. email alerts to pertinent individuals as one
example. I'm following up with them.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
I wasn't able to reproduce this.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 7:25 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Here's one of the stack traces, anyone have a clue? Can't tell if it
> reproduces, my internet conne
I'll simply move these items around tomorrow this time, unless I hear
feedback to the contrary.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:07 PM David Smiley
wrote:
> I'd like us to reflect on how we categorize iss
Welcome Nhat!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 11:34 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that Nhat Nguyen has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to join.
>
> Welcome Nhat!
>
> --
> Adrien
>
rs of related software.
> Do we want to try to separate out the upgrade notes for each version into
> separate pages at this point, or also save that as a possibility for later?
>
No opinion; your call. Maybe start a new page at 9.0.
~ David
Thanks again -
>
> Cassandra
> On F
(Mikhail Khludnev)
"Improvements" that maybe should be "Other":
* SOLR-14114: Add WARN to Solr log that embedded ZK is not supported in
production (janhoy)
Thoughts?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14292> I
don't plan on doing this anytime soon so feel free to take it up if you
wish.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:12 AM David '-1' Schmid <
david.sch..
and instead encourage plugins to be
packaged and hosted in a repository. It's very much early-days for this
new system though; there is no plugin repo for 3rd parties to deploy stuff
to yet.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Feb 27
Hi,
Please use the solr-user list for a question like this. This dev list is
for internal development. When you re-ask in solr-user, double-check which
Solr version you refer to and when it was released ;-)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com
demonstrates how to get access to a SolrCore. From a core, you can get a
SolrIndexSearcher.
For multi-shard, I suggest you keep discussion about that on the existing
JIRA issue to provide context to any possible future development. There is
no existing code for merging tagging.
~ David Smiley
;DRAFT" 4 times is at the top of this page. And it
doesn't address all questions. I wonder about Houston's point as well; I'm
not sure we can simply update an image just because the JAR files didn't
change. Maybe; maybe not.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin
I definitely care about this issue. I like the idea of splitting off a
solr-zk module. Few people know that CloudSolrClient can do a pure HTTP
mode to get cluster state indirectly from ZK via Solr, thus no necessity of
talking with ZK and what that entails architecturally (security concerns).
Issue filed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19835
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 4:27 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> +1 on Option A.
>
> Seems like it'll require an INFRA ticket though.
>
>
t is associated only with the
"create issue" operation of the "screen scheme". Do you agree? Likewise
for the Lucene project. I'll go file an Infra ticket.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 9:04 AM
I neglected to try and close up this long thread on the subject of code
review guidance. In the project's board report to the ASF, I asked for
help; Daniel Ruggeri (an ASF VP) graciously volunteered. He's on the "To"
line to my message here; he's not a member of our dev list.
Daniel:
Thanks in
FYI I'm seriously interested in this but may not get to review until Friday.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 6:50 AM Andrzej Białecki wrote:
> Hi Solr devs,
>
> I would appreciate feedback on the propos
)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
Feel free to just refer back to this email to click this link so that you
needn't waste time writing a JIRA query. In addition, maybe we could make
this easier in a release "developer docs" page.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/S
f you have opposing views on
this, please speak up in JIRA. I plan to commit the issue in a couple days.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
s be editable on a resolution screen. But what
other approach? Maybe Priority of Blocker, though it wouldn't
differentiate the next-major release from the next-minor one. Shrug; the
status quo is fine I guess.
[2]:
https://confluence.atlassian.com/adminjiraserver083/managing-project-permissi
e volunteer to get stuff
done.
Speaking of which, maybe we could make "fix version" only settable by us
committers?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 5:42 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Are you think
We can use JIRA to annotate what we want to do for 9x. I know from
experience it can be a bit aspirational and that's okay. Eventually
reality will set in and we'll remove the fix-version accordingly.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
of packages of plugins
that we have no opinion of. This is uncharted territory for us. Unlike
Helm & Docker, I don't expect a vast number of entries.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 5:52 PM Marcus Eagan wrote:
of Helm and not about 3.x. See
https://helm.sh/blog/2019-10-22-helm-2150-released/#helm-2-support-plan
too. Am I missing something?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:09 AM LEE Ween Jiann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
If this happens again, we'll have to be more careful in the release process
to not falsely suggest there was an earlier release.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:54 AM Jeff wrote:
> Nvmd, I found the fol
Congrats Anshum!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 4:15 PM Cassandra Targett
wrote:
> Every year, the Lucene PMC rotates the Lucene PMC chair and Apache Vice
> President position.
>
> This year we ha
This is a big milestone indeed! Thanks Mark, Dawid, Erick, Dat, Mike, etc.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 2:00 PM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Thank you Dawid and everyone else !
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 a
res of that binary that then become
irrelevant to check when producing the Docker image. It's also super nice
for those who fork Solr to also produce a Docker image easily (like us).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 5:45 PM
irst
match, as it did before. That would still leave most of the good change
here but some of the finess would require users to wait to 9.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
Somewhat bigger scope:
SOLR-14149 - Remove non-changes from CHANGES.txt
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14149>
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 12:33 PM David Smiley
wrote:
> The &quo
LOL
This page, "solr-system-requirements.adoc" seems to me the right place to
specify ZooKeeper's current version. No need to mention Jetty; users don't
install that.
I'll file a JIRA issue.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
user wants to mess with Jetty configuration, I'm sure he/she will
figure it out.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:59 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> In the binary distro there is no version.properties...
>
> Perh
this stuff is really in our
contribs, and some of those will be ejected soon. But even for the others,
this sort of thing is pretty easy to figure out (e.g. version.properties or
simply *look* at the jar names).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
+1
SUCCESS! [1:26:31.334270]
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:00 AM Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [1:28:25.980994]
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tommaso
>
> On Mon, 23
This unfolding story shows us why we need nightly benchmarks of Solr --
SOLR-10317 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10317>
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:35 PM Joel Bernstein wrote:
Mike D.,
I loved your response, especially for researching what other projects do!
... more responses within...
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:42 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> I'm coming late into this thread because a lot of the discussion happened
> while I was offline, so some of the focus has shifted,
with a suggestion on how
I can improve it.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 8:12 AM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:02 PM Doug Turnbull <
> dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrot
ems similar. Maybe some small changes could make
"graldew resolve" more straightforward. Despite you and Erick not liking
it, I like that you've hid it away in one place and it doesn't look hideous
to me. Any way there is no hurry on this matter; it doesn't block merging
or adopting
FWIW on a 6 year old MacBook Pro with a Quad-core i7, it seems max-workers
of 2 is about right, clocking in at 21:32. 3 took 20:17; not much better.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 9:13 AM Erick Erickson
wrote
; for Solr? I wish to
use "bin/solr".
I'm +1 with you committing to master as soon as you are comfortable.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:36 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> > - run a single unit tes
mples then they might
be good candidates to add to the doc.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 10:15 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Why should I ask for your review?
t/page related
to the guidelines of committing code with all that it entails. Many of the
items are short and shouldn't get too long (I think). But I totally get
your point that it's too much to discuss/debate at once. I will expressly
mark those parts as "[PENDING DISCUSSION]" so we
Hello Rob,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 9:39 AM Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:34 AM David Smiley
> wrote:
>
>> Last Wednesday at a Solr committers meeting, there was general
>> agreement...
>>
>> I'd prefer we have one "Commit Policy" do
The commit policy / guideline document is basically 95% there and I don't
want to wait longer to get input.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Commit+Policy+-+DRAFT
If you log-in, you can comment on the document in-line as Jan has already
done. Such feedback is good for details.
301 - 400 of 6863 matches
Mail list logo
