Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-21 Thread Michael Park
The result of this poll was: Bi-weekly: 12 Weekly: 10 So while pretty even, bi-weekly wins the vote. Let's proceed with bi-weekly community syncs and we can always reevaluate going forward. Thanks, MPark. On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:51 PM zhiwei wrote: > +1 bi-weekly > >

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-19 Thread Alexander Rojas
+1 bi-weekly (and I as bernd have been assuming rotating times) > On 15 Oct 2015, at 19:19, Michael Park wrote: > > We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly > (once every 2 weeks). > > There were differing opinions on the subject during the

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-19 Thread zhiwei
+1 bi-weekly On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Alexander Rojas wrote: > +1 bi-weekly (and I as bernd have been assuming rotating times) > > > On 15 Oct 2015, at 19:19, Michael Park wrote: > > > > We discussed whether the community syncs should be

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-18 Thread Marco Massenzio
gt; > > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske > > xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 > > > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > > > > > > From: tommy xiao > > > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > > &

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-18 Thread Adam Bordelon
t; Best Regards, > > > > Diana Arroyo > > > > darr...@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 > > > > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske > > > xiao

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-18 Thread Vaibhav Khanduja
16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske > > xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 > > > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > > > > > > From: tommy xiao > > > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > > > Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM &

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-16 Thread Adam Bordelon
49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > >> +1 for bi-weekly. >> >> Regards! >> >> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥） >> >> >> >> From: Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io> >> To: dev@mesos.apache.org >> Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 >> Subject:

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-16 Thread Bernd Mathiske
>>> >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by >> step >>> >>> >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for bi-weekly. >>>> >>>> Regards! >&

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-16 Thread haosdent
; > > > > > On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > > > >> +1 for bi-weekly. > >> > >> Regards! > >> > >> Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥） > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io>

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-16 Thread tommy xiao
weekly meeting to sync up, make progress step by > >> step > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 for bi-weekly. > >>>> > >>>> Regards! > >>>>

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-16 Thread Diana J Arroyo
+1 for weekly. Best Regards, Diana Arroyo darr...@us.ibm.com From: tommy xiao <xia...@gmail.com> To: dev@mesos.apache.org Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval +1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske <be...@mesosphere.i

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Isabel Jimenez
+1 for bi-weekly On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov wrote: > +1 for bi-weekly. > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg > > wrote: > > > +1 Weekly > > > > -Elizabeth > > > > On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Yong Qiao Wang
+1 for bi-weekly. Regards! Yong Qiao Wang（王勇桥） From: Jojy Varghese <j...@mesosphere.io> To: dev@mesos.apache.org Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval +1 bi-weekly > On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez <contact.isabeljime...@gmai

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Alex Rukletsov
+1 for bi-weekly. On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg wrote: > +1 Weekly > > -Elizabeth > > On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann wrote: > > > I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to see > > how people

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Jojy Varghese
+1 bi-weekly > On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez > wrote: > > +1 for bi-weekly > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov wrote: > >> +1 for bi-weekly. >> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Marco Massenzio
lt;j...@mesosphere.io> > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 > Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval > > > > +1 bi-weekly > > > > On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez > <contact.isabeljime...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Elizabeth Lingg
+1 Weekly -Elizabeth On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann wrote: > I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to see > how people are liking it. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu > wrote: > > >

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Kapil Arya
+1 for bi-weekly. On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht wrote: > +1 for weekly. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan > wrote: > > > +1 for weekly. > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent wrote: >

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Daniel Mercer
+1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can always reset to biweekly. On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya wrote: > +1 for bi-weekly. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Jan Schlicht wrote: > > > +1 for weekly. > > > > On Thu,

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Artem Harutyunyan
+1 for weekly. On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent wrote: > +1 for bi-weekly > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park wrote: > >> We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly >> (once every 2 weeks). >> >> There

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Greg Mann
I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate in a bit to see how people are liking it. On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu wrote: > +1 for bi-weekly > > Thanks, > > Guangya > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer >

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Jan Schlicht
+1 for weekly. On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Artem Harutyunyan wrote: > +1 for weekly. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 AM, haosdent wrote: > > +1 for bi-weekly > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park wrote: > > >

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Guangya Liu
+1 for bi-weekly Thanks, Guangya On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Daniel Mercer wrote: > +1 for weekly -- if this results in diminishing returns we can always reset > to biweekly. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Kapil Arya wrote: > > > +1 for

Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread Michael Park
We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly (once every 2 weeks). There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync today. An argument for weekly: meetings can be shorter and missing a meeting won't be as big a deal as missing a longer meeting. An

Re: Community Sync Interval

2015-10-15 Thread haosdent
+1 for bi-weekly On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Michael Park wrote: > We discussed whether the community syncs should be weekly or bi-weekly > (once every 2 weeks). > > There were differing opinions on the subject during the community sync > today. > > An argument for