Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/831
The batch v. hdfs stuff still confuses me, I thought we decided on a
different name?
---
Awesome Ryan!
Have you thought about confluence?
On December 13, 2017 at 18:11:39, Ryan Merriman (merrim...@gmail.com) wrote:
I took a first pass at adding tasks and will continue adding more as I
think of them. I will wait for feedback on which modules to include before
I add all those (only
I took a first pass at adding tasks and will continue adding more as I
think of them. I will wait for feedback on which modules to include before
I add all those (only added metron-elasticsearch for now). I left all but
a couple unassigned so that anyone can pick up a task if they want.
On Wed,
We could also filter out of enrichment to a different topology based on
field like Simon has said so that the rules are run on a filtered set etc.
also s/Ever/Either/
On December 13, 2017 at 17:03:15, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com)
wrote:
While summary of _any_ metron data ( perhaps by
Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156800428
--- Diff: metron-analytics/metron-statistics/README.md ---
@@ -53,6 +53,32 @@ functions can be used from everywhere where Stellar is
used.
* bounds
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156799950
--- Diff:
metron-analytics/metron-statistics/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/statistics/sampling/UniformSampler.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/**
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156799854
--- Diff:
metron-analytics/metron-statistics/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/statistics/sampling/UniformSampler.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/**
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156799548
--- Diff: metron-analytics/metron-statistics/README.md ---
@@ -53,6 +53,32 @@ functions can be used from everywhere where Stellar is
used.
*
While summary of _any_ metron data ( perhaps by query etc ) would be good,
let us not lose sight of the OP’s issue. Ever with summary|digest or one
at a time, they are looking for sending mails to certain people based on
rule.
A pseudo path may be
INDEXING -> New Topology or ?? -> evaluate
That makes a lot of sense, especially if you wanted the detail in the email as
well. We could definitely use some good "reporting of alerts” functionality
that would make something like that work. What do people think?
Simon
> On 13 Dec 2017, at 21:52, James Sirota wrote:
Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156796690
--- Diff: metron-analytics/metron-statistics/README.md ---
@@ -53,6 +53,32 @@ functions can be used from everywhere where Stellar is
used.
* bounds
I think there may be gaps in doing it with the profiler. You can record stats
and counts of different alert types, and maybe even alert ids, but you can't
cross-correlate these IDs to the alert body. At least not in the profiler. I
was thinking about emailing something that looks like a
Github user simonellistonball commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156794990
--- Diff: metron-analytics/metron-statistics/README.md ---
@@ -53,6 +53,32 @@ functions can be used from everywhere where Stellar is
used.
Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156794655
--- Diff: metron-analytics/metron-statistics/README.md ---
@@ -53,6 +53,32 @@ functions can be used from everywhere where Stellar is
used.
* bounds
+1
On December 13, 2017 at 16:39:52, James Sirota (jsir...@apache.org) wrote:
I can set up a dedicated Zoom room with a recurrent meeting and give PMC
members rights to the room. I think hosting these meetings should not be a
problem. I would vote not to record them, but rather provide the
I can set up a dedicated Zoom room with a recurrent meeting and give PMC
members rights to the room. I think hosting these meetings should not be a
problem. I would vote not to record them, but rather provide the notes after
the meeting. It's a lot easier to skim through the notes than jump
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156792855
--- Diff: metron-analytics/metron-statistics/README.md ---
@@ -53,6 +53,32 @@ functions can be used from everywhere where Stellar is
used.
*
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156792461
--- Diff: metron-analytics/metron-statistics/README.md ---
@@ -53,6 +53,32 @@ functions can be used from everywhere where Stellar is
used.
*
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156788055
--- Diff: metron-analytics/metron-statistics/README.md ---
@@ -53,6 +53,32 @@ functions can be used from everywhere where Stellar is
used.
*
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156790508
--- Diff:
metron-analytics/metron-statistics/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/statistics/sampling/SamplingInitFunctions.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
Github user simonellistonball commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156791019
--- Diff:
metron-analytics/metron-statistics/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/statistics/sampling/UniformSampler.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867#discussion_r156790945
--- Diff:
metron-analytics/metron-statistics/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/statistics/sampling/UniformSampler.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+/**
+ *
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867
Sorry, I am not sure I understand, this is random replacement when after
the size limit. Am I mistaking your question?
---
We can already do that with profiles I would have thought. Create a profile
that only picks alerts and then base your emails only from the alert events
produced by that profile. Would that create the right batching mechanism (at a
cost of possible higher latency than you might get with a more
I agree with Simon. If you email each alert individually you will be
overwhelmed. I think a better idea would be to email alert summaries
periodically, which is more manageable. This is probably a feature worthy of
consideration for Metron.
13.12.2017, 12:19, "Simon Elliston Ball"
GitHub user cestella opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/867
METRON-1350: Add reservoir sampling functions to Stellar
## Contributor Comments
Sampling capabilities would fit very well with the profiler and enable
algorithms that do not necessarily
I'm open to ideas. What do you think the title should be?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Otto Fowler
wrote:
> What is the Master Jira going to be?
>
>
>
> On December 13, 2017 at 14:36:50, Ryan Merriman (merrim...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> I am going to start the
What is the Master Jira going to be?
On December 13, 2017 at 14:36:50, Ryan Merriman (merrim...@gmail.com) wrote:
I am going to start the process of creating Jiras out of these initial
requirements. I agree with them and think they are a good starting point.
Feel free to join in at anytime and
I am going to start the process of creating Jiras out of these initial
requirements. I agree with them and think they are a good starting point.
Feel free to join in at anytime and add/change/remove requirements as
needed. I will update the thread once I have the initial Jiras created and
we can
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/859#discussion_r156755792
--- Diff: metron-deployment/amazon-ec2/README.md ---
@@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ To provision only subsets of the entire Metron
deployment, Ansible tags can
Hello,
Just wondering if Metron has a feature to email alerts based on rules that a
user defines.
Example:
Rule A: Email the user 1...@1.com whenever ip_src_addr=100.2.10.*
Rule B: Email the user 1...@1.com whenever payload contains "critical"
If not, does anyone have any recommendations on
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/859#discussion_r156751241
--- Diff: metron-deployment/amazon-ec2/README.md ---
@@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ To provision only subsets of the entire Metron
deployment, Ansible tags can
Github user mmiklavc commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/859#discussion_r156748130
--- Diff: metron-deployment/amazon-ec2/README.md ---
@@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ To provision only subsets of the entire Metron
deployment, Ansible tags can be s
Github user nickwallen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/866#discussion_r156746647
--- Diff: metron-deployment/playbooks/metron_install.yml ---
@@ -15,13 +15,6 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
---
-- hosts:
Github user merrimanr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/859#discussion_r156744095
--- Diff: metron-deployment/amazon-ec2/README.md ---
@@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ To provision only subsets of the entire Metron
deployment, Ansible tags can be s
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/866#discussion_r156737918
--- Diff: metron-deployment/playbooks/metron_install.yml ---
@@ -15,13 +15,6 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
---
-- hosts:
Github user ottobackwards commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/859#discussion_r156737230
--- Diff: metron-deployment/amazon-ec2/README.md ---
@@ -126,6 +126,10 @@ To provision only subsets of the entire Metron
deployment, Ansible tags can
Github user nickwallen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/866#discussion_r156726426
--- Diff: metron-deployment/playbooks/metron_install.yml ---
@@ -15,13 +15,6 @@
# limitations under the License.
#
---
-- hosts:
Github user nickwallen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/866#discussion_r156725657
--- Diff: metron-deployment/roles/ambari_config/tasks/main.yml ---
@@ -26,16 +26,15 @@
retries: 5
delay: 10
-- name : check if
Github user nickwallen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/866#discussion_r156724938
--- Diff: metron-deployment/roles/epel/tasks/main.yml ---
@@ -16,6 +16,4 @@
#
---
- name: Install EPEL repository
- yum:
GitHub user nickwallen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/866
METRON-1349 Full Dev Builds Metron Twice
Removing the "Quick Dev" environment in #852 had an unintended side effect.
It caused Metron to be built twice during the Full Dev deployment process.
Github user mmiklavc commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/859#discussion_r156723676
--- Diff: metron-deployment/roles/ambari_config/vars/small_cluster.yml ---
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ configurations:
topology.classpath: '{{
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/862
Please take care to mark the jira as done
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/862
---
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/857
Follow up from @merrimanr and my work yesterday. We upped the versions of
Node to 9.2.1. Per the doc, >8 is required to work with async/await. For good
measure, I also set the NPM version to 5.6.0.
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/863
Actually, I don't think `original_string` is required past the parser
topology. For instance, profiler messages into enrichment do not have
`original_string`.
---
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/862
+1, Thanks for the contribution!
---
GitHub user ottobackwards opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/865
METRON-1212 The bundle System and Maven Plugin (Feature Branch)
This PR contains the Bundle system and Maven Plugin.
The bundle system and the plugin are adapted from the Apache Nifi
Github user ottobackwards closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/774
---
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/863
The minimum required fields, as far as I can see right now are source.type,
original_string and timestamp. Given the use case for this is something that
has skipped the parser topology, we
Github user simonellistonball commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/863#discussion_r156676868
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-writer/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/writer/bolt/BulkMessageWriterBolt.java
---
@@ -229,17 +239,30 @@ public
Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/863#discussion_r156676155
--- Diff: metron-platform/metron-indexing/README.md ---
@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ Indices are written in batch and the batch size and
batch timeout are specified
Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/863#discussion_r156675356
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-writer/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/writer/bolt/BulkMessageWriterBolt.java
---
@@ -229,17 +239,30 @@ public void
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/863
I would like to hear feedback from @ottobackwards on other required fields
but this looks good to me otherwise.
---
Github user merrimanr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/863#discussion_r156674159
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-writer/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/writer/bolt/BulkMessageWriterBolt.java
---
@@ -229,17 +239,30 @@ public void
I am ok with just notes and no recording.
On December 13, 2017 at 04:37:20, Simon Elliston Ball (
si...@simonellistonball.com) wrote:
Good points Larry, we would need to get consent from everyone on the call
to record to properly comply with regulations in some countries. We would
definitely
Good points Larry, we would need to get consent from everyone on the call to
record to properly comply with regulations in some countries. We would
definitely need someone to step up as note taker.
Something else to think about is intended audience. Previously we’ve had
meeting like this
57 matches
Mail list logo