Mnemonic board report due in one week.

[Patrick Hunt]

Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
here by April 6th:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016

Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
insight.

Patrick

Re: Mnemonic website go alive.

[Patrick Hunt]

Kudos!

Patrick

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Gary  wrote:
> Sorry I'm not good at website design and layout but I think I will try
> this for your review, could you please fire a JIRA ticket so I can post
> the screen snapshot instead of commits for experimental comparison ? Thanks.
>
> On 4/22/2016 9:13 AM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
>> Thanks Gary and Debo.
>> Is there a way to use unshaded letters. I found they are difficult to read 
>> with white background.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yanping
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Gary [mailto:ga...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 8:48 AM
>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Mnemonic website go alive.
>>
>> Hi, Mnemonic website has been online, Please visit following URL to check.
>> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>>
>> We continue to improve and add contents to this website, please give us
>> your advice and contribute your code.
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mnemonic-site.git
>>
>> Thanks.
>> +Gary.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: Mnemonic website go alive.

[Patrick Hunt]

Looks good. One thing that still seems a bit off to me is that
"Apache" isn't mentioned until near the bottom of your home page (on
my laptop it gets cut off before apache is even mentioned). Most (?)
other incubator projects make it clear right up front that this is an
Apache X project current under incubation... etc

Here are some examples I pseudo-randomly picked:
http://htrace.incubator.apache.org/
http://atlas.incubator.apache.org/
http://quarks.incubator.apache.org/

Perhaps you can squeeze your tag line btw your logo and your code example? e.g.

---
 headers...
"Apache Mnemonic (incubating) is a Java based non-volatile memory
library for in-place structured data processing and computing."
if (mnemonic.inUse)
etc...


Something like that would make it clear right up front that this is an
Apache project.

Patrick

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Gary <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Done, please review it, Thanks.
>
> On 4/22/2016 10:54 AM, Gary wrote:
>> I'm going to fix it, Thanks Patrick.
>>
>> On 4/22/2016 10:48 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>> btw, a few things that you need to address ASAP. Please review the
>>> branding guide:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html
>>> in particular you are missing the disclaimer:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers
>>> as well as the incubator logo (next section on that page)
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Kudos!
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Sorry I'm not good at website design and layout but I think I will try
>>>>> this for your review, could you please fire a JIRA ticket so I can post
>>>>> the screen snapshot instead of commits for experimental comparison ? 
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/22/2016 9:13 AM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks Gary and Debo.
>>>>>> Is there a way to use unshaded letters. I found they are difficult to 
>>>>>> read with white background.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Yanping
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>>> From: Gary [mailto:ga...@apache.org]
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 8:48 AM
>>>>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: Mnemonic website go alive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, Mnemonic website has been online, Please visit following URL to 
>>>>>> check.
>>>>>> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We continue to improve and add contents to this website, please give us
>>>>>> your advice and contribute your code.
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-mnemonic-site.git
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>> +Gary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.1.2-incubating [rc2]

[Patrick Hunt]

+1 sig/xsum are valid, RAT runs clean. I ran through the release checklist
and everything seems fine to me.

Patrick

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a discussion releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.1.2-incubating, release candidate 2. This
> is the first release of Mnemonic.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.1.2-incubating-rc2/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.2-incubating:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.2-incubating
>
> The release hash is 8b26f1480bd4d3fd9ced65f6598d5fa1378015ad:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=8b26f1480bd4d3fd9ced65f6598d5fa1378015ad
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.1.2-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as nifi-0.0.1
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.1.1-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

Looks pretty good, a few issues:

1) missed some cleanup before the build? This is in the archive:

$ ls allocator-services/service-dist/
nvml-vmem-service-0.1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
pmalloc-service-0.1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
nvml-vmem-service-0.1.0-incubating.jar pmalloc-service-0.1.0-incubating.jar
nvml-vmem-service-0.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
pmalloc-service-0.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
nvml-vmem-service-0.1.1-incubating.jar pmalloc-service-0.1.1-incubating.jar

did you mean to include the build and dist directories?

$ ls ./allocator-services/nvml-vmem-service/src/main/native
CMakeLists.txt
LICENSE
build/
common.c
common.h
config.h.in
dist/
org_apache_mnemonic_service_allocatorservice_internal_VMemServiceImpl.c
org_apache_mnemonic_service_allocatorservice_internal_VMemServiceImpl.h

2) pom has a few items, needs to be reviewed:

name should include Apache Mnemonic
developers section - not sure on this one, perhaps best to leave it
out? donno, perhaps check what other projects do...
inceptionYear seems wrong?

Patrick

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Gary  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a discussion releasing Apache Mnemonic 0.1.1-incubating, 
> release candidate 1. This
> is the first release of Mnemonic.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.1.1-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.1.1-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.1.1-incubating
>
> The release hash is 8b26f1480bd4d3fd9ced65f6598d5fa1378015ad:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=8b26f1480bd4d3fd9ced65f6598d5fa1378015ad
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/garyw.asc
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> 38 issues were closed/resolved for this release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubator Mnemonic Release v0.1.0-incubating

[Patrick Hunt]

-1. You need to have a single "release artifact" that can be signed,
voted on, and published
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
e.g.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#release-distribution

In particular the release artifact is typically an archive of your
source repository which exactly matches the source control tag. It's
fine to have other "convenience artifacts", such as binaries and code
jars published to maven, etc..., however those are beyond the scope of
the official "release" itself.

Unfortunately the incubator release documentation doesn't come out and
say this directly. I looked around but I couldn't find it. Take a look
at something like the Twill release guide, it's a good example of how
most projects (at least the ones I'm familiar with) do it:
http://twill.incubator.apache.org/ReleaseGuide.html

Do notice the checklist here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
Things such as the disclaimer, notice and license files need to be
contained within the release artifact.

EOD the release artifact, the source code, is what defines an Apache
"release", and only then once it's been voted upon, etc... More
details here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#releases

Note:

I'd recommend linking to Apache resources, e.g. git.apache.org rather
than github.com in any messaging.

Let me know if you have any questions (ask on your dev list). The
first release is always the hardest and typically takes some
back/forth.

Patrick

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Gary  wrote:
> Hello
> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache
> Mnemonic (incubating)
> mnemonic-0.1.0-incubating.
>
> The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemnemonic-1035
>
> The Git tag is mnemonic-parent-0.1.0-incubating
> The Git commit ID is 5e6e930d5c96568f8369f8123188d009359ba11c
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=c85ec4941cfba6be0da796c27cd650d92199405d
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/garyw.asc
>
> KEYS file available here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/blob/master/KEYS
>
> 35 issues were closed/resolved for this release:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as nifi-0.0.1
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> B.R,
> +Gary.
>

Re: Mnemonic Website doesn't take effect

[Patrick Hunt]

I'm afraid I don't have any experience with this setup. Check old
INFRA jiras to see if anyone else has requested help?

Patrick

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm using the Jekyll instead of cms and the source code of this website
> is managed by branch "asf-site-src", I manually build the website using
> command "jekyll build" and then push the contents of target directory to
> branch "asf-site", I searched the infra records, some of them says it
> should trigger gitpubsub/gitwcsub once something committed to the branch
> "asf-site", but it looks not happened for our project... Thanks.
>
>
> On 4/19/2016 7:21 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>> Are you using cms? I don't see it in staging:
>> http://mnemonic.staging.apache.org/ also not listed here:
>> https://cms.apache.org/
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I have pushed one several days ago, it didn't show up, I think probably
>>> the Site config has not yet been deployed, but how to check it ?
>>>
>>> On 4/18/2016 8:51 PM, Wang, Yanping wrote:
>>>> I had same issue this afternoon. Sometime it needs a bit longer before we 
>>>> can publish.
>>>> You can publish again to see if it picked up the new content now
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Yanping
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Gary [mailto:ga...@apache.org]
>>>> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 8:48 PM
>>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic Website doesn't take effect
>>>>
>>>> Yes please I have pushed the contents from target directory to branch
>>>> "asf-site".
>>>>
>>>> On 4/18/2016 8:44 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote:
>>>>> Let me check. But we have to only check the target directory not source
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 18, 2016, at 8:43 PM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, I have pushed the site to the branch "asf-site" but it still shows
>>>>>> "Not Found" after visiting URL "http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/;,
>>>>>> any idea ? thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B.R,
>>>>>> +Gary.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>
>

Kudos and keeping the status page updated.

[Patrick Hunt]

Hi folks. Kudos on getting bootstrapped and filing your first report.
I have been very impressed with the progress.

One thing you should get into the habit of doing is reviewing your
incubation status page each/every time you file a report (prior to
filing the report really).

I'm talking about this page:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
and more specifically the "Incubation work items" section.  Please go
through the list ASAP and ensure that whatever is completed is noted
("NA" is also possible) along with the date of _completion_. For
example it's very important to verify that all mentors are signed up
for the lists, hence an early item is "Subscribe all Mentors on the
pmc and general lists.", etc

Additionally a few comments:
1) You should get your cwiki setup, I can help you with this if you
give me a cwiki account id for 1 or 2 folks that would like to start
as administrators for your "space".

Typically you want all your "non product documentation" on the wiki,
things that are geared for developers (vs users which is typically on
the web site), etc... What lives where is up to you but I usually see
stuff targeted at community members/developers on the cwiki. Things
that might change relatively frequently and are not release version
specific.

2) Remove "extra" from your project info. I don't see where that adds
value and might be confusing. Folks can query your jira to see who's
contributing, and that's typically a good place to keep an eye out for
folks that should be moved up to committer. (although that depends on
how you track things in jira...)

3) there is a "incubation status reports" section on that page, not
sure the value but you should probably link it to the incubator report
pages which contain your report.

Regards,

Patrick

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating [rc3]

[Patrick Hunt]

+1 sig/xsum are valid, RAT ran clean, necessarily files seem to be in place
(e.g. disclaimer), I was able to build successfully.

Patrick

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate 3. This
> is the second release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.2.0-incubating-rc3/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.2.0-incubating:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.2.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 6203b6f06177a48c860d63f72afb78eaae556ebc:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=6203b6f06177a48c860d63f72afb78eaae556ebc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.2.0-incubating-rc3/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

This is not being run in a git repo - I ran it in a directory that I
unpacked the release artifact itself. The odd bit seems the "does not exist
@" - not sure what the "@" means.

$ git clean -xdf
fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git

$ mvn -pl '!mnemonic-memory-services/mnemonic-nvml-vmem-service' clean
package install
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:
[ERROR] Child module
/Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating/mnemonic-computing-services
of /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating/pom.xml does
not exist @
 @
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR]   The project org.apache.mnemonic:mnemonic-parent:0.2.0-incubating
(/Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating/pom.xml) has 1
error
[ERROR] Child module
/Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating/mnemonic-computing-services
of /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating/pom.xml does
not exist
[ERROR]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR]
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
>
>Thank you very much for the verification !
>
>Regarding this issue,  could you please try the following commands ?
> because I suspect that there are some obsolete files cause this issue,
> Thanks.
>
> *$ git clean -xdf*
>
> *$ mvn -pl '!mnemonic-memory-services/mnemonic-nvml-vmem-service' clean 
> package install
> *
>
>In addition, unfortunately, we have to exclude nvml service since the
> external nvm library cannot be compiled on OSX.
>
> Thanks!
>
> B.R,
>
> +Gary
> On 7/17/2016 12:03 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>
> Hi Gary, everything looks ok except I can't build the project:
>
> $ mvn clean install
> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> [ERROR] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:
> [ERROR] Child module
> /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating/mnemonic-computing-services
> of /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating/pom.xml does
> not exist @
>  @
> [ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR]   The project org.apache.mnemonic:mnemonic-parent:0.2.0-incubating
> (/Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating/pom.xml) has 1
> error
> [ERROR] Child module
> /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating/mnemonic-computing-services
> of /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.2.0-incubating/pom.xml does
> not exist
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
> switch.
> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> [ERROR]
> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> please read the following articles:
> [ERROR] [Help 
> 1]http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
>
>
> $ mvn --version
> Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
> 2015-11-10T08:41:47-08:00)
> Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.3.9/libexec
> Java version: 1.8.0_73, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> Java home:
> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_73.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.11.5", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> <ga...@apache.org> 
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.2.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the second release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.2.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.2.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.2.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 40a6f72cc935b7b2c2e7852414e4504a7852f4c3:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=40a6f72cc935b7b2c2e7852414e4504a7852f4c3
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following 
> key:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file 
> available:https://dist.apache.org/rep

Mnemonic board report due tomorrow (Weds).

[Patrick Hunt]

Hi, just a reminder that the board report is due tomorrow. Please update
the reporting page asap http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2016

Regards,

Patrick

Re: Mnemonic board report due tomorrow (Weds).

[Patrick Hunt]

It's a good idea to review your status page when you submit your
report (it's good to review it more frequently than that, but at a
minimum it's a great opportunity).

http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html

Patrick

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Patrick and our IPMCs,
>
> I have submitted the report to Apache Wiki portal for your review, Thanks!
>
> Hi Yanping
>
> Thanks for your help! :)
>
> B.R,
> +Gary
>
> On 9/6/2016 12:37 PM, Gary wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> Thanks for your reminding, We will update reporting page tonight, Thanks!
>>
>> B.R,
>> +Gary
>>
>> On 9/6/2016 11:21 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>> Hi, just a reminder that the board report is due tomorrow. Please update
>>> the reporting page asap http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2016
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating [rc2]

[Patrick Hunt]

+1, sig/xsum verify, rat ran clean, everything looks fine to me and I was
able to build (excluding a few modules which I don't have pre-reqs on my
machine for.).

Patrick

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate 2. This
> is the third release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 3.0-incubating-rc2/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.3.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.3.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 6203b6f06177a48c860d63f72afb78eaae556ebc:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=55a211fc56f760dfb84574a7640c2353ae836d61
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 3.0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating [rc4]

[Patrick Hunt]

+1 xsum/sig verified, rat ran clean. I was able to build with certain
submodules turned off (support not available on my system). lgtm.

Patrick

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.3.0-incubating, release candidate 4. This
> is the third release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 3.0-incubating-rc4/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.3.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.3.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 178035c68f1df26e4f3fcf9314bb6248c2ad3ac0:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=178035c68f1df26e4f3fcf9314bb6248c2ad3ac0
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 3.0-incubating-rc4/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.3.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Quarterly Board Report

[Patrick Hunt]

Those are great goals, however the only things really gating graduation at
this point IMO (other mentors can chime in if they feel otw) is; 1)
continue driving releases, esp with different release managers to show that
a number of people understand "the Apache way" (one aspect granted), 2)
increase community involvement, esp diversity (typically we talk about this
in terms of not having a single company represented, but overall diversity
is a good goal as well) in committer/pmc membership.

Regards,

Patrick


On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Patrick
>
> Thank you very much for your guiding and advice, I have corrected that as
> follows.
>
>   2. Introduced women developers to our incubating project.
>   3. Improved dev. docker to facilitate development.
>   4. provided information to potential customers e.g. bank user, other
> Apache project's committers
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016
>
> Please review it again, Thanks !
>
> Very truly yours,
> +Gary
>
>
> On 12/5/2016 12:46 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > I signed off on the report. One thing I noticed is that you list your
> "top
> > 3 for graduation", however that's not really what's gating your
> graduation.
> > Please review
> > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.htm
> l#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
> >
> > Item 1 in your report is on point (experience delivering releases,
> ensuring
> > apache release guidelines/requirements are followed) however the other
> two
> > are not gaiting your graduation. I would say instead that building
> > community (including committers/pmc) and increasing diversity, so that
> you
> > can stand alone as a TLP, is missing.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi PMCs and Developers
> >>
> >> We have submitted the quarterly board report as follows, Please review,
> >> feedback and approve this report, Thanks!
> >>
> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016
> >>
> >> Very truly yours,
> >> +Gary
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

Re: Quarterly Board Report

[Patrick Hunt]

I signed off on the report. One thing I noticed is that you list your "top
3 for graduation", however that's not really what's gating your graduation.
Please review
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator

Item 1 in your report is on point (experience delivering releases, ensuring
apache release guidelines/requirements are followed) however the other two
are not gaiting your graduation. I would say instead that building
community (including committers/pmc) and increasing diversity, so that you
can stand alone as a TLP, is missing.

Patrick

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi PMCs and Developers
>
> We have submitted the quarterly board report as follows, Please review,
> feedback and approve this report, Thanks!
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016
>
> Very truly yours,
> +Gary
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.4.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

+1 - xsum/sig verified, RAT ran clean, was able to compile/install most of
the modules (on a mac so filtered off a few I don't have deps for).

Patrick

On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Gary  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.4.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 4.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.4.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.4.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 178035c68f1df26e4f3fcf9314bb6248c2ad3ac0:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=7799e7094545db9640269d14543bf28d7a7e0335
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 4.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.4.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

+1 xsum/sig verified, RAT ran clean, checklist looks ok. Was able to
build/test/install the source. lgtm.

Patrick

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hello incubator PMCs,
>
> The Apache Mnemonic community PPMCs and developers have voted and
> approved the proposal to release Apache Mnemonic 0.6.0 (incubating).
>
> Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library,
> it's proposed a non-volatile/durable Java object model and durable
> computing model that bring several advantages to significantly improve
> the performance of massive real-time data processing/analytic.
> developers are able to use this library to design their cache-less and
> SerDe-less high performance applications.
>
> [VOTE] thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCALuGr6Z1UX-pU4wRHea-J4roWW%
> 2BwYOK20tfF%2B4-EdRT6TS6K_A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAG7vPR%2B5Uv9ide1gnaPQT4a%
> 3DWrgsDLfzN9i3xJ3i8Dq-G3oyuA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CD50D574B.2FDB5%25uma.gangumalla%40intel.com%3E
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAOgX8sz9vy3ms_sEpP0%
> 3DmV6adJX8JFbwynppRAPfkXkNi17%3DrQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> [VOTE RESULT] thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-
> mnemonic-dev/201704.mbox/%3CCAOgX8sy7mSUR8HvrWCfc2YXtMNR
> 9R5UCj3EaL_RF145SARbKAA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on
> this incubator release.
>
> The Apache Mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating release candidate is now
> available with the following artifacts for a project vote:
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 6.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.6.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=d40a8f23bd18954b0d93ba7f8196f40d05c55dcc
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 6.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.6.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
>
> Thanks,
> Gary on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) team
>

Re: Do we use the IRC chatrooms?

[Patrick Hunt]

Decisions should not be made over chat or any other out of band
communication aside from the mailing lists (the jiras are mirrored to the
ML so that's fine as well). The expectation is that if you have offline
discussions you bring it back to the group via ML/JIRA and then make
decisions. This ensures everyone is included in the decision making
process, even folks that might be on separate timezones, etc... keeping
them from participating in things like p2p chats. That said IRC etc... are
fine and good tools to help build community, but you do need to keep this
particular issue in mind.

fwiw the same would hold for things like meetups. Great for community
building, but discuss things there, bring them back to the group and then
make decisions.

Patrick

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Gangumalla, Uma 
wrote:

> Guys, Please note that if you made any decision over your chat about the
> project, you must post them on JIRAs for community transparency.
> This is the expected thing from Apache.
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> On 3/3/17, 4:39 PM, "Gary"  wrote:
>
> >I totally agree with you, we must talk to each others to make Mnemonic
> >better.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >+Gary.
> >
> >
> >On 3/3/2017 4:16 PM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
> >> We should try to do regular meetings to discuss roadmaps and blockers
> >>
> >> this will help to grow the community!
> >>
> >> debo
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Gary  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Debo,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for creating the channels on IRC for use, hope the IRC could
> >>> help Mnemonic growing.
> >>>
> >>> B.R,
> >>> +Gary
> >>>
> >>> On 3/3/2017 3:10 PM, Debojyoti Dutta wrote:
>  Sorry  its #apache-mnemonic-dev  sent the chatrooms in a
> separate
>  email ...
> 
>  On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta)
> 
>  wrote:
> 
> > FWIW I had setup the chatroom incubator-mnemonic chatroom on
> >freenode.
> > Would love to meet up with fellow mnemonic developers.
> >
> > debo
> >
> > From: "Debo Dutta (dedutta)" 
> > Date: Friday, March 3, 2017 at 2:59 PM
> > To: "dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org"  >>> apache.org
> > Subject: Do we use the IRC chatrooms?
> >
> > Would be good for the devs to be on the chatrooms!
> >
> > debo
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Re: Mnemonic incubator report due tomorrow

[Patrick Hunt]

Great, thanks Gary.

Congratulations to the community on one year in the incubator! I realized
today the milestone.

Be aware that in addition to signing off on the report I also added some
comments. Please review and feel free to speak up if you do not agree with
my summary, or if you have more to add.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2017

Regards,

Patrick

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Gary <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
>
> Thanks for your reminding, the report has been submitted as follows,
> Please review, Thanks.
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2017
>
> Very truly yours
> +Gary
>
> On 2/28/2017 9:26 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > Hi folks, the quarterly incubator report is due tomorrow. Please get it
> > posted to the wiki asap.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Patrick
> >
>
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Patrick Hunt]

Given the recent work to bring on additional RMs (and increase community
involvement in general) and clearly document release procedures I feel that
my previous concerns have been largely addressed. If there is interest in
the community I would now be in favor, but up to you - do you feel you're
ready to graduate at this point?

Regards,

Patrick


On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@apache.org> wrote:

> On the diversity issue, we are trying to solve that with new committers
> from different organizations. We have had contributions from other
> companies like Cisco recently.
>
> This space is about to heat up soon and we will see more committers.
>
> cheers
> debo
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I've mentored a number of podlings over the years and this one if very
> well
> > run and is on a good trajectory. As noted my main concern is about
> > diversity - in particular "self-sustaining and self-governing
> communities".
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
> > That's pretty clear and concise statements from the Apache community as a
> > whole as to what it takes. The podling is following "the apache way"
> quite
> > well, so it's really the sustaining part for me. Ensuring that community
> is
> > being built and the community as a whole is owning the process.
> >
> > Hope this helps, regards,
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For me the best test if a podling is ready for graduation is they do it
> > > (mostly) for themselves. So, Mnemonic, I'd encourage you to search
> > through
> > > the incubator mailing list archives for examples of other podlings
> > running
> > > a graduation vote and submitting the result to the IPMC. Then, do it.
> > >
> > > I'm glad to see the recent move to bring in more RMs in response to the
> > > earlier feedback, now that everyone is aware of it. Sorry, I didn't
> think
> > > that the incubator report might not be read back.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:42 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Patrick,
> > >>
> > >> I read it.  I'm curious, did you or Andrew share your feedback with
> > >> Mnemonic directly?  I've noticed that podlings sometimes don't see the
> > >> input, and don't receive responses the way TLPs do.
> > >>
> > >> For the podling's information, we do also maintain a whimsy page of
> all
> > >> approved board reports per project, Mnemonic can see that information
> > >> here:
> > >> https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Mnemonic
> > >>
> > >> When I see a podling receiving 5 +1's on a dev list release vote,
> > that's a
> > >> great sign.
> > >>
> > >> There probably is room for more on list discussion, and yes the
> > committer
> > >> diversity isn't 100% there (I would be curious to see company
> > >> affiliations).
> > >>
> > >> I'll also point out that I sometimes ask these questions to podlings
> to
> > >> get
> > >> them to start thinking about graduation, not actually moving forward
> yet
> > >> due to $reasons.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:58 PM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi John, did you read my feedback on the most recent podling report?
> > Do
> > >> > you disagree? I don't believe this has changed significantly in the
> > past
> > >> > month/two. For example all releases have been done by a single
> person.
> > >> >
> > >> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2017
> > >> >
> > >> > As I've mentioned previously my only concerns at this point are
> around
> > >> > diversity.
> > >> >
> > >> > Patrick
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Hi John and PPMCs
> > >> >>
> > >> >> As John advised, our community and project mnemonic might be ready
> to
> > >> get
> > >> >> graduated, I'd like to start the following votes according to the
> > >> >> 

Fwd: [REMINDER] Policies around Publicity & Press

[Patrick Hunt]

Hi folks. In case you missed this on general@ please ensure you're familiar
with these policies.

Regards,

Patrick

-- Forwarded message --
From: John D. Ament 
Date: Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:21 PM
Subject: [REMINDER] Policies around Publicity & Press
To: "gene...@incubator.apache.org" 


All Podlings,

In recent days I've been contacted about several publicity issues that have
gone a bit off kilter.  I wanted to remind podlings two very import
policies.

1. Podlings MUST coordinate with the Public Relations Committee with all
publicity activities.
2. The Press Team MUST review any press releases or similar communication
referencing a podling before it is published.

Relevant Links:

https://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#publicity_activities
https://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#publicity_throughout_the_
incubation_process

Please reach out with any concerns.

Regards,

John D. Ament
VP, Apache Incubator

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Patrick Hunt]

I believe it's this one:
https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html

wrt readiness see my previous comment on this thread - iirc John was
concerned about the status of the web site but from what I've seen there
have been significant improvements since. John?

Regards,

Patrick

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Gangumalla, Uma <uma.ganguma...@intel.com>
wrote:

> IMO, Mnemonic project doing good and ready for graduation.
> What is the mentors call on this?
>
> I remember many other projects do Maturity model checklist to check where
> we are? Gary/John do you mind ready that sheet, so that will help to
> assess better?
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> On 8/16/17, 12:46 PM, "Johnu George" <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >It seems that we are ready to be a top level project .  We have a stable
> >release and we work well as a apache community under the guidance of our
> >mentors.   Any thoughts?
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear John and Patrick,
> >>
> >> Thank you for the guidance, we have completed the construction of
> >>Mnemonic
> >> Website recently according to your feedback, this Apache server hosted
> >> website will be kept up to date and maintained by dedicated community
> >> members.  we also have redirected the visitors from Github to our Apache
> >> server hosted website by providing a forward link in project README.md
> >> file. Please review it as follows.
> >>
> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
> >>
> >> Note: the browser cache may cause unexpected view of this website,
> >>please
> >> clear browser cache or visit it in incognito mode.
> >>
> >> Very truly yours.
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:04 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi patrick,
> >> >
> >> > I recently raised an issue with the website to the team.  I personally
> >> > would like to see that fixed before a graduation.  Specifically saying
> >> that
> >> > you need to learn it from github.
> >> >
> >> > John
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Given the recent work to bring on additional RMs (and increase
> >> community
> >> > > involvement in general) and clearly document release procedures I
> >>feel
> >> > that
> >> > > my previous concerns have been largely addressed. If there is
> >>interest
> >> in
> >> > > the community I would now be in favor, but up to you - do you feel
> >> you're
> >> > > ready to graduate at this point?
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > >
> >> > > Patrick
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> On the diversity issue, we are trying to solve that with new
> >> committers
> >> > >> from different organizations. We have had contributions from other
> >> > >> companies like Cisco recently.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> This space is about to heat up soon and we will see more
> >>committers.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> cheers
> >> > >> debo
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > I've mentored a number of podlings over the years and this one if
> >> very
> >> > >> well
> >> > >> > run and is on a good trajectory. As noted my main concern is
> >>about
> >> > >> > diversity - in particular "self-sustaining and self-governing
> >> > >> communities".
> >> > >> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
> >> > >> > That's pretty clear and concise statements from the Apache
> >>community
> >> > as
> >> > >> a
> >> > >> > whole as to what it takes. The podling is following "the apache
> >>way"
> >> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Patrick Hunt]

Hi John, did you read my feedback on the most recent podling report? Do you
disagree? I don't believe this has changed significantly in the past
month/two. For example all releases have been done by a single person.

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2017

As I've mentioned previously my only concerns at this point are around
diversity.

Patrick

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi John and PPMCs
>
> As John advised, our community and project mnemonic might be ready to get
> graduated, I'd like to start the following votes according to the processes
> of http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html with your mentoring
> and guidance if no objection today
>
>- Community graduation vote
>- IPMC recommendation vote
>
> Mnemonic Project Incubation Status
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
> Very truly yours
> +Gary
>
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:
>
> > Hi John
> >
> > Thank you for starting this discussion.
> >
> > Yes, our community is growing and continue to attract more people to join
> > our community. Some industry users are aware of mnemonic and already get
> > interested as i known.
> >
> > Mnemonic is able to deliver unique values to their business so I think
> > that it is very important for us to get mnemonic graduated in time if
> > qualified.
> >
> > My 2 cents, looks nothing left for us to graduate Mnemonic, I'm also
> > looking forward to propose our project as Apache TLP.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Very truly yours
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, May 2, 2017, John D. Ament  wrote:
> > > Hi Mnemonic PPMC,
> > >
> > > After looking at your recent release, your current growth and well
> > functioning PPMC, was wondering what was left for you guys to graduate?
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> >
>

Re: [UPDATE] Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

Hi Debo, it looks like there was some confusion on the incubator general
vote? Do I read that right?

It looks like the result was declared prior to calling for the general@
vote, subsequent to voting on the dev list, do I have that right?

If so you should finalize the general@ thread with a proper "result" now
that the voting has completed. If I don't have that right then please
clarify my misunderstanding.

If the voting is indeed complete and the release finalized is there
anything else left to do? It looks like the announce needs to be sent as
well (but ensure that the voting is indeed finalized before sending :-) )

Regards,

Patrick


On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Update: Patrick Hunt's vote was binding, updated that
>
> * Binding votes +1s: *
> Uma Gangumalla (umamahesh)
> Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
> Patrick Hunt (phunt)
>
> * Non-binding votes +1s: *
> Gang (Gary) Wang (garyw)
> Johnu George (johnu)
> Chunyong He (chunyong...@gmail.com)
> Yanhui Zhao (yanhui.z...@outlook.com)
> Wen Tong (pures...@gmail.com)
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
> Apache
> > Mnemonic 0.8.0-incubating passed with 2 binding +1s, 6 non-binding +1s
> > and no 0 or -1.
> >
> > * Binding votes +1s: *
> > Uma Gangumalla (umamahesh)
> > Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
> >
> > * Non-binding votes +1s: *
> > Gang (Gary) Wang (garyw)
> > Johnu George (johnu)
> > Patrick Hunt (phunt)
> > Chunyong He (chunyong...@gmail.com)
> > Yanhui Zhao (yanhui.z...@outlook.com)
> > Wen Tong (pures...@gmail.com)
> >
> > Project Members Role Info
> > http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/
> >
> > *Thanks all*
> > Cheers
> > Debo Dutta, on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>
>
>
> --
> -Debo~
>

Re: Apache Mnemonic Releasing

[Patrick Hunt]

You might add the "how to contrib" to your web site.
http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ Any other updates that are
pending for the web site? (docs seem empty? perhaps just update to point to
content available elsewhere)

Are any new http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/talks/ available?

This would also be a good time to review the incubator status page, I
notice you've probably completed a number of the "work items" (mark the
ones that are not applicable as "NA"?)
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html

feedback on how to release:
* very impressive :-)
* link the "dockerfile" to the actual dockerfile?
* for things like 1.1.3.1 (checkout) I'd recommend listing the actual
command. It makes it foolproof for anyone trying to cut a release to
copy/paste. In my experience the more you can cut out potential for error
the better off you'll be long term.
* for things like "send XXX email" i've found it helpful to include the
template in the instructions. It's pretty boilerplate with a number of
required bits of data, easier to just include this than expect the RM to
figure it out. Again, smooths the release mechanics and ensures anyone can
pick it up at any time.

Patrick

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Patrick, Debo, Uma and Folks.
>
> I have written the initial version of "How to release" page for your
> review.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/How+to+release
>
> @Uma, Thank you very much for constructing our project Wiki portal and
> already added "How to Contribute to Mnemonic" page for us.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MNEMONIC/
> How+to+Contribute+to+Mnemonic
>
> Very truly yours.
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Great! Thanks Debo :)
>>
>> Very truly yours
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gary
>>>
>>> Thx for the 1st version  happy to help and will add to the notes as
>>> I do the release :)
>>>
>>> debo
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Got it, Thanks, Let me submit initial version of "how to release" to
>>>> wiki page.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours.
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Having a "how to release" wiki page (or any kind of living document)
>>>>> for
>>>>> the project ensures that anyone in the community can release the
>>>>> product.
>>>>> This is great for onboarding new RMs, etc...
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Debojyoti Dutta <ddu...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Thx a lot Gary and Patrick for the tips on release management. It
>>>>> would be
>>>>> > my 1st so I am going to seamlessly ask for forgiveness :)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > debo
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> fyi many projects capture this, some even capture the exact email
>>>>> formats
>>>>> >> etc..., on their wiki. Typically as a "how to release" page, e.g.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToRelease
>>>>> >> http://htrace.incubator.apache.org/building.html
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> You might compare to what you've created, however each project
>>>>> typically
>>>>> >> has it's own special cases.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> For things like "Commit the whole new release candidate folder in
>>>>> the
>>>>> >> staged trunk
>>>>> >> using the SVN client to commit it all" (and similar) you probably
>>>>> should
>>>>> >> just give the command to run to simplify things and reduce the
>>>>> chances for
>>>>> >> error. The more you can make each operation "copy/paste" the more
>>>>> likely
>>>>> >> you'll have a su

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

+1 xsum/sig are valid. RAT ran clean. Was able to build/test some of the
modules on my system (mac).

Patrick

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Debojyoti Dutta  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.8.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 8.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.8.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v0.8.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 2941b87:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=2941b87f7e28c898cbecb35c845e5b4cd90bc197
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 8.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Debo~ Dutta, on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

I'm confused, I thought this rc (rc1) voting was cancelled:

"[CANCEL] Cancelling the vote due to Formatting woes ..."

in such cases a new vote should be started, with a new rc number, in order
to remove any ambiguity/confusion.

Patrick


On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Chunyong He  wrote:

> +1
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chunyong
>
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Gary Wong  wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> > License is okay, all tests pass, keys are correct
> >
> > Thanks
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Debojyoti Dutta 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > > 0.8.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > 8.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.8.0-incubating:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > mnemonic.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/v0.8.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The release hash is 2941b87:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=2941b87f7e28c898cbecb35c845e5b4cd90bc197
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > >
> > > KEYS file available:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > 8.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> The
> > > please vote:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.8.0-incubating
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Debo~ Dutta, on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

+1 sig/xsum verified, RAT ran clean, was able to compile/install on my
system.

Patrick

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.7.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.7.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.6.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.7.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=
> 73a2bb7a35ed768b382be2068e0a22a1ced0a67e
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.7.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.7.0-incubating
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Very truly yours,
> Gary
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Patrick Hunt]

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:42 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:

> Patrick,
>
> I read it.  I'm curious, did you or Andrew share your feedback with
> Mnemonic directly?  I've noticed that podlings sometimes don't see the
> input, and don't receive responses the way TLPs do.
>
>
A quick search shows recent feedback a few months ago that's consistent
with my current comments and updates to the board:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1c364f30e6df1880cf924534687dfa787ec8403a0c4f1f5b2e3a1475@%3Cdev.mnemonic.apache.org%3E
of course we can always do better/more frequent.


> For the podling's information, we do also maintain a whimsy page of all
> approved board reports per project, Mnemonic can see that information here:
> https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Mnemonic
>
> When I see a podling receiving 5 +1's on a dev list release vote, that's a
> great sign.
>
> There probably is room for more on list discussion, and yes the committer
> diversity isn't 100% there (I would be curious to see company affiliations).
>
>
Agree. As noted to the IPMC previously the mentor activity hasn't been
great. We're effectively at 1/2 strength. Perhaps with more mentor
involvement we could cover more of the bases.


> I'll also point out that I sometimes ask these questions to podlings to
> get them to start thinking about graduation, not actually moving forward
> yet due to $reasons.
>
>
That's a good forcing function. Unfortunately it can set expectations with
the podling that their mentors "are the bad guys, keeping us from
graduation", vs looking out for their best interests and best interests of
the foundation. I would expect the mentors to be consulted before
significant changes are recommended.

Regards,

Patrick


>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:58 PM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi John, did you read my feedback on the most recent podling report? Do
>> you disagree? I don't believe this has changed significantly in the past
>> month/two. For example all releases have been done by a single person.
>>
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2017
>>
>> As I've mentioned previously my only concerns at this point are around
>> diversity.
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John and PPMCs
>>>
>>> As John advised, our community and project mnemonic might be ready to get
>>> graduated, I'd like to start the following votes according to the
>>> processes
>>> of http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html with your
>>> mentoring
>>> and guidance if no objection today
>>>
>>>- Community graduation vote
>>>- IPMC recommendation vote
>>>
>>> Mnemonic Project Incubation Status
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
>>> Very truly yours
>>> +Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi John
>>> >
>>> > Thank you for starting this discussion.
>>> >
>>> > Yes, our community is growing and continue to attract more people to
>>> join
>>> > our community. Some industry users are aware of mnemonic and already
>>> get
>>> > interested as i known.
>>> >
>>> > Mnemonic is able to deliver unique values to their business so I think
>>> > that it is very important for us to get mnemonic graduated in time if
>>> > qualified.
>>> >
>>> > My 2 cents, looks nothing left for us to graduate Mnemonic, I'm also
>>> > looking forward to propose our project as Apache TLP.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> > Very truly yours
>>> > Gary
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tuesday, May 2, 2017, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > > Hi Mnemonic PPMC,
>>> > >
>>> > > After looking at your recent release, your current growth and well
>>> > functioning PPMC, was wondering what was left for you guys to graduate?
>>> > >
>>> > > John
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Patrick Hunt]

I've mentored a number of podlings over the years and this one if very well
run and is on a good trajectory. As noted my main concern is about
diversity - in particular "self-sustaining and self-governing communities".
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
That's pretty clear and concise statements from the Apache community as a
whole as to what it takes. The podling is following "the apache way" quite
well, so it's really the sustaining part for me. Ensuring that community is
being built and the community as a whole is owning the process.

Hope this helps, regards,

Patrick

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:

> For me the best test if a podling is ready for graduation is they do it
> (mostly) for themselves. So, Mnemonic, I'd encourage you to search through
> the incubator mailing list archives for examples of other podlings running
> a graduation vote and submitting the result to the IPMC. Then, do it.
>
> I'm glad to see the recent move to bring in more RMs in response to the
> earlier feedback, now that everyone is aware of it. Sorry, I didn't think
> that the incubator report might not be read back.
>
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:42 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Patrick,
>>
>> I read it.  I'm curious, did you or Andrew share your feedback with
>> Mnemonic directly?  I've noticed that podlings sometimes don't see the
>> input, and don't receive responses the way TLPs do.
>>
>> For the podling's information, we do also maintain a whimsy page of all
>> approved board reports per project, Mnemonic can see that information
>> here:
>> https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Mnemonic
>>
>> When I see a podling receiving 5 +1's on a dev list release vote, that's a
>> great sign.
>>
>> There probably is room for more on list discussion, and yes the committer
>> diversity isn't 100% there (I would be curious to see company
>> affiliations).
>>
>> I'll also point out that I sometimes ask these questions to podlings to
>> get
>> them to start thinking about graduation, not actually moving forward yet
>> due to $reasons.
>>
>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:58 PM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi John, did you read my feedback on the most recent podling report? Do
>> > you disagree? I don't believe this has changed significantly in the past
>> > month/two. For example all releases have been done by a single person.
>> >
>> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2017
>> >
>> > As I've mentioned previously my only concerns at this point are around
>> > diversity.
>> >
>> > Patrick
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi John and PPMCs
>> >>
>> >> As John advised, our community and project mnemonic might be ready to
>> get
>> >> graduated, I'd like to start the following votes according to the
>> >> processes
>> >> of http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html with your
>> mentoring
>> >> and guidance if no objection today
>> >>
>> >>- Community graduation vote
>> >>- IPMC recommendation vote
>> >>
>> >> Mnemonic Project Incubation Status
>> >> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
>> >> Very truly yours
>> >> +Gary
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi John
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you for starting this discussion.
>> >> >
>> >> > Yes, our community is growing and continue to attract more people to
>> >> join
>> >> > our community. Some industry users are aware of mnemonic and already
>> get
>> >> > interested as i known.
>> >> >
>> >> > Mnemonic is able to deliver unique values to their business so I
>> think
>> >> > that it is very important for us to get mnemonic graduated in time if
>> >> > qualified.
>> >> >
>> >> > My 2 cents, looks nothing left for us to graduate Mnemonic, I'm also
>> >> > looking forward to propose our project as Apache TLP.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks!
>> >> > Very truly yours
>> >> > Gary
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tuesday, May 2, 2017, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> > > Hi Mnemonic PPMC,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > After looking at your recent release, your current growth and well
>> >> > functioning PPMC, was wondering what was left for you guys to
>> graduate?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > John
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>- Andy
>
> If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond
> Teller (via Peter Watts)
>

Mnemonic board report is due.

[Patrick Hunt]

Hi folks, the board report is due tomorrow. Please get it submitted asap.

Regards,

Patrick

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Mnemonic to TLP

[Patrick Hunt]

+1 Proceed with graduation process

Regards,

Patrick

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang  wrote:

> Please vote on this community resolution to seek graduation to TLP for
> Mnemonic.
>
> This vote will be open for ~72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> three +1 Apache Mnemonic PPMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Proceed with graduation process
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
> [ ] -1 Do not proceed yet because…
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

[Patrick Hunt]

+1 - sig/xsum verify, rat ran clean, I was able to compile the code ok.

Patrick

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Johnu  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.9.0-incubating, release candidate rc2. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 9.0-incubating-rc2/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.9.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-mnemonic
> .git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.9.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 9861eb1e80edf46f600c3c5dd7f7e08255b278ba:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=
> 9861eb1e80edf46f600c3c5dd7f7e08255b278ba
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 9.0-incubating-rc2/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Patrick Hunt]

ps.

> 3) Many contributed have voted +1s for this graduation

keep in mind that this is the discussion thread and not a vote. Note (see
the link to grad doc I just provided) that you need to do a couple things
before the vote.

Patrick

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:

> I reviewed the status page earlier today and it looks up to date to me.
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/mnemonic.html
>
> Similarly the "preparation" steps have been followed afaict:
> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#graduation_check_list
> namesearch <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95>
> etc... signed off a while ago
>
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Let me summarize the discussion on graduation, Please refer to this email
>> thread for details.
>>
>> 1) We have completed the website of Mnemonic that is required before
>> graduation
>> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/
>>
>> 2) We have filled the Apache project maturity assessment for Mnemonic and
>> fixed all gaps that would be helpful for graduation
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/10LKTjPMceV4s4MrSRIA9L8pg
>> 7jLFp-ec-TmW96mZbXM/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> 3) Many contributed have voted +1s for this graduation
>>
>> Please add yours if any before we are starting graduation votes, Thanks!
>>
>> Cheers
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs
>>>
>>> Looks no new issues crop up for a few days, and many contributors are
>>> positive and voted +1s for graduation, no negative from our community, so I
>>> think this discussion could be settled down today and proceed to collect
>>> votes from our community and IPMCs for graduation, please guide us if any
>>> missing, misunderstanding and suggestion, Thanks!
>>>
>>> Very truly yours
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi John, Mentors and PPMCs
>>>>
>>>> Looks we have resolved all the issues that you have pointed out for
>>>> graduation, meanwhile, there are more contributors +1 for our project's
>>>> graduation so, could we start the community graduation vote and IPMC
>>>> graduation vote according to the following chart extracted from
>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community ? Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Wen Tong <pures...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 support for graduation.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Wei HE <hevei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > +1 support for graduation.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Wei HE
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> Yes, I also totally agree this and we will try our best for the
>>>>> readiness
>>>>> >> for the graduation.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> For the suggestion that John advised, we have prepared the following
>>>>> >> comments for your review, Thanks!
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> *CD20 - You have a link in your header called GITHUB that brought
>>>>> me to
>>>>> >> your source code.  Other projects use hacking guides.  Unless
>>>>> you're on
>>>>> >> gitbox, the git primary repo should be the ASF hosted repos.*
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> The github link has been removed from CD20 and using
>>>>> >> http://mnemonic.incubator.apache.org/develop/ as the link of
>>>>> website. we
>>>>> >> also create ticket MNEMONIC-355 (resolved) to remove Github link
>>>>> from
>>>>> >> navigator menu on website.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> *CD30 - The usage of docker is in of itself a violation of this
>>>>> item, from
>>>>> >> my point of view.  In your case, you're pointing to "centos:latest"
&

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation?

[Patrick Hunt]

gt;> > ga...@apache.org>
>>>> >> > >> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >> > >> >>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>> Hi John
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>> I didn't realize that and thank you very much for
>>>> pointing it
>>>> >> out,
>>>> >> > >> we
>>>> >> > >> >>>>> will correct this according to your guidance.
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>> Thanks!
>>>> >> > >> >>>>> Very truly yours
>>>> >> > >> >>>>> Gary
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:54 AM, John D. Ament <
>>>> >> > >> johndam...@apache.org>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Thanks, but you're still out of compliance.
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> - You're linking directly to your un-mirrored artifacts,
>>>> but
>>>> >> you
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> should be linking to your mirrored artifacts.
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> - You have not cleaned up your old releases, your old
>>>> releases
>>>> >> > >> should
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> be archived.
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> Now here's the catch - we require mirroring but I can't
>>>> find
>>>> >> > >> anything
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> saying what the mirroring URL is.  The format is going
>>>> to be
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> http://apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mnemonic and
>>>> you'll
>>>> >> > >> want
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> to grab your specific version from there.
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> John
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:31 PM Gang(Gary) Wang <
>>>> >> > ga...@apache.org>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> The Download menu item has been added to the navigator
>>>> in home
>>>> >> > >> page,
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> Please refresh your browser to review it, Thank you
>>>> very much
>>>> >> > for
>>>> >> > >> the
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> suggestion.
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> Very truly yours
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> Gary
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
>>>> >> > >> ga...@apache.org>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>>
>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> You can download all versions of the 

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
(default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation failure:
Compilation failure:
[ERROR]
/Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
error: cannot find symbol
[ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
[ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
[ERROR]
/Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
error: cannot find symbol
[ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
[ERROR]
/Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
error: cannot find symbol
[ERROR] -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
>
> The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
>
> The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> KEYS file available:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
>
> The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

Is this a feature or a regression?

Patrick

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Patrick and other mentors,
>   Can you please vote for the release?
>
> Thanks,
> Johnu
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate this issue
> > further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we fix it for new
> > JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could be a blocker
> for
> > this release candidate? Thanks!.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> $java -version
> >> java version "9.0.1"
> >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to compile?
> >> >
> >> > $java -version
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> > Gary.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
> >> > >
> >> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> >> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
> >> > > (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation failure:
> >> > > Compilation failure:
> >> > > [ERROR]
> >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> >> > > [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> >> > > [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> >> > > [ERROR]
> >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> >> > > [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> >> > > [ERROR]
> >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> >> > > [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> >> > > [ERROR]
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George <jo...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi all,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> >> > > > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> >> > > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found
> >> > at:
> >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> >> > > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> >> > > > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> >> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> >> > > > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >> > > >
> >> > > > KEYS file available:
> >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >> > > >
> >> > > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> >> > > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> >> > > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
> >> items
> >> > > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and
> test.
> >> > The
> >> > > > please vote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> >> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

ic. If it's a regression I would personally terminate the rc vote, fix it,
and then cut a new rc. But that's my personal preference, I don't believe
there's any specific rule wrt this type of thing. Would suck for folks
using it certainly.

Patrick

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
>
> I think it is a regression, not a feature. Thanks.
>
> Best,
> Gary.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Is this a feature or a regression?
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Patrick and other mentors,
> > >   Can you please vote for the release?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Johnu
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate this issue
> > > > further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we fix it for
> > new
> > > > JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could be a
> blocker
> > > for
> > > > this release candidate? Thanks!.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> $java -version
> > > >> java version "9.0.1"
> > > >> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
> > > >> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to compile?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > $java -version
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Best,
> > > >> > Gary.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > > >> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
> > > >> > > (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation failure:
> > > >> > > Compilation failure:
> > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> > > >> > > [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > >> > > [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > >> > > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > > >> > > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > > >> > > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> > > >> > > error: cannot find symbol
> > > >> > > [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> > > >> > > [ERROR]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George <jo...@apache.org
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Hi all,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > > >> > > > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > > >> > > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> > > found
> > > >> > at:
> > > >> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubat

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

Sounds like it's not something to consider for this release.

I checked out the rest of the artifact and it seemed OK to me - +1.

Regards,

Patrick

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Henry,
>
> Thank you very much for the clarification, It's my bad to misunderstand
> the meanings of regression and feature.
>
> We have not yet tried to compile the project with Java9 before, the issue
> found by Patrick make me realize that the JDK9 has been GA released.
>
> So we are fine with this release candidate, right? Thanks!
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I'm really sorry for the confusion.
>
> Best.
> Gary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I would argue this is not a blocker since the pom.xml define the target
>> JVM:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mnemonic/blob/master/pom.xml#L104
>>
>> Gary, when you said regression, did you mean it was working with Java9
>> before and now it was not?
>> If it has not been working with Java9 from beginning this should not be
>> release blocker.
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Patrick,
>> > Thanks for the reply. Currently,Mnemonic doesn't support
>> > Java 9 due to incompatible interface changes. We verified the release
>> with
>> > Java8. (Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNEMONIC-401)
>> If it
>> > is a blocker, I will cancel the rc vote. Else, we will fix it in the
>> next
>> > release.  Please let us know.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Johnu
>> >
>> > On Nov 6, 2017 11:38 AM, "Gang(Gary) Wang" <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Patrick,
>> > >
>> > > Thank you very much for the guidance and we will try to figure out
>> how to
>> > > fix this issue you found.
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Gary.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > ic. If it's a regression I would personally terminate the rc vote,
>> fix
>> > > it,
>> > > > and then cut a new rc. But that's my personal preference, I don't
>> > believe
>> > > > there's any specific rule wrt this type of thing. Would suck for
>> folks
>> > > > using it certainly.
>> > > >
>> > > > Patrick
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Gary Wong <qich...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Patrick,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think it is a regression, not a feature. Thanks.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best,
>> > > > > Gary.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Is this a feature or a regression?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Patrick
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Johnu <johnugeorge...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Patrick and other mentors,
>> > > > > > >   Can you please vote for the release?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > Johnu
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <
>> > ga...@apache.org>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > Looks it is caused by the new JDK, we need to investigate
>> this
>> > > > issue
>> > > > > > > > further to make it compatible with older JDK version if we
>> fix
>> > it
>> > > > for
>> > > > > > new
>> > > > > > > > JDK. let me create a JIRA ticket for this issue, and could
>> be a
>> > > > > blocker
>> > > > > > > for
>> > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating [rc1]

[Patrick Hunt]

$java -version
java version "9.0.1"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang <ga...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Patrick, which version of the JDK you are using to compile?
>
> $java -version
>
> Best,
> Gary.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Doesn't seem to be compiling for me:
> >
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.3:compile
> > (default-compile) on project mnemonic-core: Compilation failure:
> > Compilation failure:
> > [ERROR]
> > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > SysMemAllocator.java:[25,15]
> > error: cannot find symbol
> > [ERROR]   symbol:   class Cleaner
> > [ERROR]   location: package sun.misc
> > [ERROR]
> > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,12]
> > error: cannot find symbol
> > [ERROR]   symbol: class Cleaner
> > [ERROR]
> > /Users/phunt/Downloads/m/apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-
> > incubating/mnemonic-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mnemonic/
> > SysMemAllocator.java:[86,31]
> > error: cannot find symbol
> > [ERROR] -> [Help 1]
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johnu George <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > > 0.10.0-incubating, release candidate rc1. This
> > > is the new release of Mnemonic incubating.
> > >
> > > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
> at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon is v0.10.0-incubating:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.10.0-incubating
> > >
> > > The release hash is 0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=0e6cf3534b2f1a6407021e0d99073d794690f71b
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > >
> > > KEYS file available:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> > >
> > > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > > 10.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.
> The
> > > please vote:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Johnu on behalf of the Apache Mnemonic (incubating) community
> > >
> >
>