Hi Charles,
Charles-H. Schulz schreef:
> Le Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:45:30 +0200,
> "Simon Brouwer" a écrit :
>
>>
>>
>> Charles-H. Schulz schreef:
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > I just wanted to clarify things (again).
>> > I am going to leave the project / we, the founders of the Document
>> > Found
Hello Louis,
Le Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:50:57 -0400,
Louis Suárez-Potts a écrit :
>
> Hi Charles, et al.,
>
> On 2010-10-18, at 05:37 , Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
>
> > Louis,
> >
> >
> > Le Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:32:28 -0400,
> > Louis Suárez-Potts a écrit :
> >
> >>
> >> All,
> >> I have asked
Le Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:45:30 +0200,
"Simon Brouwer" a écrit :
>
>
> Charles-H. Schulz schreef:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I just wanted to clarify things (again).
> > I am going to leave the project / we, the founders of the Document
> > Foundation, are going to leave the project at some given
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Von: Mike Dupont
>> An: dev@native-lang.openoffice.org
>
>>
>> Also, I would like to say that it has been very hard to find
>> translator for ooo, because it is so huge. I would like to sugg
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:09 +0200, Andre Schnabel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Von: Mike Dupont
> > An: dev@native-lang.openoffice.org
>
> >
> > Also, I would like to say that it has been very hard to find
> > translator for ooo, because it is so huge. I would like
Charles-H. Schulz schreef:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I just wanted to clarify things (again).
> I am going to leave the project / we, the founders of the Document
> Foundation, are going to leave the project at some given time and have
> every intention to keep things clear and clean.
>
> But I/we are
Hello everyone,
I just wanted to clarify things (again).
I am going to leave the project / we, the founders of the Document
Foundation, are going to leave the project at some given time and have
every intention to keep things clear and clean.
But I/we are not going to be thrown out by people wh
On 10/18/2010 06:50 PM, Christian Lippka wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> Am 18.10.2010 17:28, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
>> Le Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:10:44 +0200,
>> Pavel Janík a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> On 18.10.2010, at 15:56, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
>>>
Martin: the community is leaving.
>>> No no. Cha
Le Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:10:44 +0200,
Pavel Janík a écrit :
>
>
> On 18.10.2010, at 15:56, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
>
> > Martin: the community is leaving.
>
> No no. Charles and co left (or leaving, slowly so the damage to the
> OOo and the project is bigger...). That's correct. Nothing else
On 18.10.2010, at 15:56, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Martin: the community is leaving.
No no. Charles and co left (or leaving, slowly so the damage to the
OOo and the project is bigger...). That's correct. Nothing else.
Community didn't left. Community of OpenOffice.org is still here.
--
Pa
Hello Martin,
Le Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:16:55 +0200,
Martin Hollmichel a écrit :
>
> On 10/18/2010 11:37 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > Please define why my new role would
> > confuse the OpenOffice.org community.
> maybe
> http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=releases&msgNo=16165
>
On 10/18/2010 11:37 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> Please define why my new role would
> confuse the OpenOffice.org community.
maybe
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=releases&msgNo=16165
helps understanding,
Martin
-
Hi,
Original-Nachricht
> Von: Mike Dupont
> An: dev@native-lang.openoffice.org
>
> Also, I would like to say that it has been very hard to find
> translator for ooo, because it is so huge. I would like to suggest
> that we merge strings with abiword that has been translated a
If I may say something about this, of course I am just a nobody here,
but there does not seem to be any problem with people taking part in a
main project and its forks or branches. In fact, OOo will benefit from
its forks because it represents a good chance for further development.
I dont want to
Louis,
Le Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:32:28 -0400,
Louis Suárez-Potts a écrit :
>
> All,
> I have asked that Charles Schulz recuse himself from his role as lead
> of the NLC category because of the confusion his new role outside of
> OpenOffice.org would produce in the minds of contributors and users.
Hi André,
Op 15-10-2010 19:01, André Schnabel schreef:
Hi Louis,
Am 15.10.2010 18:05, schrieb Louis Suárez-Potts:
I guess then we disagree. For I see OpenOffice.org as quite distinct
and different from Oracle, just as it was different from Sun, and
just as it differs from any one company. O
resent because SeaMonkey chose didn't find out the reason by now) the
(unsubscribed) OOo mail address as sender (please don't moderate my
other mail to the list):
Hi Louis, all
sorry if I misunderstand your action here, but (if timestamps are true)
you posted this message exactly at the time
Hi all, and André,
On 2010-10-15, at 13:01 , André Schnabel wrote:
> Hi Louis,
>
>
> Am 15.10.2010 18:05, schrieb Louis Suárez-Potts:
>>
>> I guess then we disagree. For I see OpenOffice.org as quite distinct
>> and different from Oracle, just as it was different from Sun, and
>> just as it d
Hi Louis,
Am 15.10.2010 18:05, schrieb Louis Suárez-Potts:
I guess then we disagree. For I see OpenOffice.org as quite distinct
and different from Oracle, just as it was different from Sun, and
just as it differs from any one company. OOo is a community of
differences and likes.
I think, we
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On 2010-10-15, at 24:34 , Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> Le 15/10/2010 03:12, Louis Suarez-Potts a écrit :
>>
>> On 2010-10-14, at 18:11 , Lior Kaplan wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts <
>>> louis.suarez-po...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
All,
>>>
Le 15/10/2010 03:12, Louis Suarez-Potts a écrit :
>
> On 2010-10-14, at 18:11 , Lior Kaplan wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts <
>> louis.suarez-po...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>> I have asked that Charles Schulz recuse himself from his role as lead of
>>> the NL
On 2010-10-14, at 21:40 , Joey Stanford wrote:
>> This is not an Oracle issue. Rather, it's a longstanding OpenOffice.org
>> policy not to permit the use of our resources for the advocacy of other
>> projects or interests.
>
>> The issue at stake is not an us vs. them thing.
>
> By your own a
On 2010-10-14, at 18:11 , Lior Kaplan wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts <
> louis.suarez-po...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>> I have asked that Charles Schulz recuse himself from his role as lead of
>> the NLC category because of the confusion his new role outside of
On 2010-10-14, at 18:43 , Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
> Le 14/10/2010 21:32, Louis Suárez-Potts a écrit :
>> All,
>> I have asked that Charles Schulz recuse himself from his role as lead of the
>> NLC category because of the confusion his new role outside of OpenOffice.org
>> would produce in th
Le 14/10/2010 21:32, Louis Suárez-Potts a écrit :
> All,
> I have asked that Charles Schulz recuse himself from his role as lead of the
> NLC category because of the confusion his new role outside of OpenOffice.org
> would produce in the minds of contributors and users.
Ok, so I understand tha
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts <
louis.suarez-po...@oracle.com> wrote:
> All,
> I have asked that Charles Schulz recuse himself from his role as lead of
> the NLC category because of the confusion his new role outside of
> OpenOffice.org would produce in the minds of contribut
Hi Louis,
Louis Suárez-Potts wrote (14-10-10 21:32)
All, I have asked that Charles Schulz recuse himself from his role as
lead of the NLC category because of the confusion his new role
outside of OpenOffice.org would produce in the minds of contributors
and users. I have not received an answer,
Hi,
On 2010-10-14, at 16:14 , Goran Rakic wrote:
> У чет, 14. 10 2010. у 16:03 -0400, Louis Suárez-Potts пише:
>
snip
> As far as I know we do not have any process on electing project leads
> (or do we have?), so I do not have any formal objections.
When I set up the Native Language Category (
У чет, 14. 10 2010. у 16:03 -0400, Louis Suárez-Potts пише:
> I think that's pretty much an example of his new role and equally of
> the conflict of interest
I do not think community members should be valued on what they are doing
inside other projects. Based on your reply I believe we agree on th
On 2010-10-14, at 15:50 , Goran Rakic wrote:
> Hi Louis,
>
> У чет, 14. 10 2010. у 15:32 -0400, Louis Suárez-Potts пише:
>> because of the confusion his new role outside of OpenOffice.org would
>> produce in the minds of contributors and users
>
> Do you have an example of such behavior? Are we
Hi Louis,
У чет, 14. 10 2010. у 15:32 -0400, Louis Suárez-Potts пише:
> because of the confusion his new role outside of OpenOffice.org would
> produce in the minds of contributors and users
Do you have an example of such behavior? Are we not jumping to
conclusions to soon?
> impossibility of hi
All,
I have asked that Charles Schulz recuse himself from his role as lead of the
NLC category because of the confusion his new role outside of OpenOffice.org
would produce in the minds of contributors and users. I have not received an
answer, so I must presume one, that he would act with good
32 matches
Mail list logo