Lets meet and talk about NuttX International Workshops in order to
gather feedback how we are doing and what can we improve :-)
We will have group video meeting tomorrow on 2025-10-29 (Wed) 1700UTC
on NuttX_Disco_Cyberspace also to test this channel on Discord before
our monthly community online m
Just a first public preview of v0.1 :D
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 12:24 AM Alan C. Assis wrote:
>
> Seems like Grok just copied the wikipedia page, better to use wikipedia
> directly.
>
> BR,
>
> Alan
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 8:11 PM Tomek CEDRO wrote:
>
> > https://grokipedia.com/page/NuttX
> >
Oops... I forgot to Reply List on this one. Sorry it is out of context
> On 10/27/25 15:06, Sebastien Lorquet wrote:<>>.
I dont remember this being discussed on the mailing list.
There was a lot of discussion about creating a NuttX organization in the
old pre-Apache Discord channel. It was
Seems like Grok just copied the wikipedia page, better to use wikipedia
directly.
BR,
Alan
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 8:11 PM Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> https://grokipedia.com/page/NuttX
>
> --
> CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
>
https://grokipedia.com/page/NuttX
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Actually, I think that Xiaomi is a great open source partner. I see
only two real issues: (1) There is a communication obstacle. We are not
included in the decision making process for the changes so many of the
changes are out-of-context for us and it is hard to be supportive of
changes that
Hello,
I have no more hard feeling about this now. it is done.
I just think that this is interesting context information that would
have be very valuable to understand the "almost take over" by xiaomi
that I resisted a few months ago.
If I had known that it was part of the "big plan for nutt
> The old days, the project mail was used only for technical
discussions. There were seldom public project discussions. You can see
all public discussion outside of the Discord here:
https://groups.google.com/g/nuttx. The old Discord channel was removed.
Things worked worked much better then
> In the old days, the project mail was used only for technical
discussions. There were seldom public project discussions. You can see
all public discussion outside of the Discord here:
https://groups.google.com/g/nuttx. The old Discord channel was
removed. Things worked worked much bett
Well that really sux :-(
Considering they manufacture their own MCU/SoC that would have perfect
drivers on NuttX directly from vendor that also use the RTOS
commercially maybe they do not want to sell their chips or what :\
I had kinda bad experiences with UFS2+J that is UFS2 with Journaling
enab
No, they didn't.
Actually they changed the license from BSD to Apache, so NuttX was BSD and
couldn't incorporate the changes.
Now NuttX is Apache, but we don't bring back their modifications because
their Apache files have BSD license just below the Apache text.
Only a lawyer can say if it is fi
Didn't Samsung create TinyAra -> TizenOS/TizenRT based on NuttX in 2015?
https://docs.tizen.org/platform/tizen-rt/tizen-rt-overview/
Did they share anything back to the NuttX?
Tomek
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 10:25 PM Alan C. Assis wrote:
>
> Sebastien,
>
> It wasn't "DURING" the apache migration
Sebastien,
It wasn't "DURING" the apache migration, actually it was Xiaomi that
convinced Greg to donate NuttX to Apache.
Before that we had a frustrating experience with Samsung trying to move
NuttX to the Linux Foundation.
I don't think it was discussed in the mailing list.
BR,
Alan
On Mon,
I dont remember this being discussed on the mailing list.
I just remember the almost forceful push to make nuttx an apache
incubator project during christmas holidays while everyone was busy with
end of year activities and unavailable to discuss deeply on the original
mailing list.
It's over
More...I think OpenVela is completely open source. It is a userspace framework
that runs on NuttX or Linux. Nuttx is not "inside" of OpenVela: They use
same os from the same repositories as you do.They encourage and support open
source development just as NuttX does.I hope that someone from
Cool :-) Maybe one day I get there.. so far I am the pink panther with
long list of todo todo to doo too do too do tooo do.. and I really
love the unique old-school Unix vibes of NuttX thus my main focus here
:-)
Have a good day :-)
Tomek
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 9:47 PM spudaneco wrote:
>
> A
Alan: We moved to apache in December of 2019 not 2018Tomek: That article was
obviously written by Xiaomi marketing. My quotes are, for example, generally
accurate bot with a little marketing spiin.There are several architectural
block diagrams in the OpenVela presentations. It runs on top
Okay got one that works thank you Greg! I was surprised to see I am in
the part of the world being already cut out from the rest of the world
due to "smart" bureacratic policies already.. but to be honest I
understand it even agree with that somehow :-) :-)
"openvela is the open-source version of
Actually it should be better saying they played a key role moving NuttX to
Incubation at Apache Foundation in 2018.
Xiaomi helped in the process to transfer NuttX to Apache Foundation.
Greg and David Sidrane traveled to China to discuss this process with them.
BR,
Alan
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at
Or
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/openvelas-inaugural-global-developer-conference-concludes-successfully-nuttx-founder-gregory-nutt-joins-to-shape-aiot-ecosystem-302594467.html
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/openvelas-inaugural-global-developer-conference-concludes-successfull
Or..
https://www.cbs42.com/business/press-releases/cision/20251025CN06853/openvelas-inaugural-global-developer-conference-concludes-successfully-nuttx-founder-gregory-nutt-joins-to-shape-aiot-ecosystem/
From: Gregory Nutt
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 11:14 AM
T
Or maybe:
https://www.cbs42.com/business/press-releases/cision/20251025CN06853/openvelas-inaugural-global-developer-conference-concludes-successfully-nuttx-founder-gregory-nutt-joins-to-shape-aiot-ecosystem/
From: Gregory Nutt
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 11:12
Sorry. Here is another site. Perhaps you will have better luck:
https://vulcanpost.com/prnewswire/openvelas-inaugural-global-developer-conference-concludes-successfully-nuttx-founder-gregory-nutt-joins-to-shape-aiot-ecosystem/
From: Tomek CEDRO
Sent: Monday, Oc
same here :(
Best regards
Alin
On Mon, 27 Oct 2025, 18:58 Tomek CEDRO, wrote:
> 451: Unavailable due to legal reasons
>
> We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country
> belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which
> enforces the General Data Prot
451: Unavailable due to legal reasons
We recognize you are attempting to access this website from a country
belonging to the European Economic Area (EEA) including the EU which
enforces the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and therefore
access cannot be granted at this time. For any issue
It played a key role in promoting NuttX to become an Apache top-level
project in 2022 ???
Sebstien
On 10/27/25 18:26, Gregory Nutt wrote:
This article is showing up in sever sites across the web:
https://www.inyoregister.com/online_features/press_releases/openvelas-inaugural-global-developer-
This article is showing up in sever sites across the web:
https://www.inyoregister.com/online_features/press_releases/openvelas-inaugural-global-developer-conference-concludes-successfully-nuttx-founder-gregory-nutt-joins-to-shape-aiot/article_4440fb40-ce11-5663-b4bf-288e25031cd8.html
Follow-up of the conversation.
The problem was not the configured size (I was able to make it work
with 4K). I was missing adding a __ISB between writes: LittleFS was
verifying the memory but failed due to CRC. Instead of forwarding the
"LFS_ERR_CORRUPTED" back, it was changed (I don't know why) w
Hi
I'm trying to compile some configs for my spresense board.
"spresense:nsh" runs without problems, but when I try to compile some
configurations for the *camera* I have the following error:
CC: video/v4l2_cap.c In file included from
/home/bucher/sviluppo/NUTTX/nuttx/include/nuttx/video/v4
I'm going to give it a try, thanks Jehudi!
Although it doesn't fit our needs, we'd need a FS that supports
smaller values. Do you have any suggestions and/or recommendations for
an FS embedded into NuttX that we can use for this purpose? I've been
digging into some NuttX docs about this, but I onl
Yeah I am okay with this new updated name apps/system/nxinit in place
of too generic apps/system/init :-)
It would be good to vote but as there are no other ideas / comments /
objections we can proceed with the change as NXINIT. If there are this
is the last chance to talk :-)
Thanks :-)
Tomek
Hi Tomek,
+1 NXInit -> apps/system/nxinit -> nxinit.
I think that we should avoid using external names (that inspired the init) to
avoid confusion and functionality demands from our init systems (compared with
the ones that inspired them).
Best regards
Alin
Fr
Okay so looks like there are two name propositions for this new application:
1. Android System Init -> apps/android/init -> android_init (or just ainit).
2. NXInit -> apps/system/nxinit -> nxinit.
If the discussion with ideas is concluded lets just VOTE on the
mailing list so the community decides
33 matches
Mail list logo
