and
clicked off the child permission blockage which gave the administrator full
control and so far it seems to be working.
regards Janet
On 12 August 2015 at 18:22, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
mailto:orc...@apache.org wrote:
Janet,
Thank you for your follow-up.
Are you saying
, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
mailto:orc...@apache.org wrote:
Here is the procedure for you to try. I have more questions:
1. I don't know if this will work as described for a file in a OneDrive
folder. Let us know if it works.
2. I don't know about .odb files either. Let us know
Corrections to the wording in IF YOU DON'T SUCCEED
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2015 13:46
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: NOT EDITABLE ON WINDOWS 10: The Lingering-Lock Case
After upgrading to Windows 10, some
Jason, use the more-comprehensive advice from Regina.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Jason Marshall [mailto:j_k_marshall_2...@live.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2015 11:20
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Simple code practice to get started
Dear Dennis
Thank you for
Janet Monk sent her response directly to me. I am forwarding it to the list
with permission. I have a response for the *.odt files that I will post at
once. The *.odb files may be trickier.
[ … ]
From: Janet Monk [mailto:janm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2015 02:05
To:
After upgrading to Windows 10, some users notice that they have files
OpenOffice reports as not editable. There is a report that the named file is
locked for editing. (This is slightly different than saying the files are
read-only.)
WHEN THIS IS HAPPENING TO YOU ...
If you followed the
We are reading reports of some users being able to edit in OpenOffice after
upgrading to Windows 10. We have not been able to reproduce the situation from
that information alone. Many of us have upgraded to Windows 10 without
difficulty.
If you or someone you know is having this problem
We are reading reports of some users *not* being able to edit in OpenOffice
after upgrading to Windows 10. We have not been able to reproduce the
situation from that information alone. Many of us have upgraded to Windows 10
without difficulty.
If you or someone you know is having this
only. Seems like the likeliest thing to me.
Max
Am 08.08.2015 um 19:28 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
We are reading reports of some users being able to edit in OpenOffice after
upgrading to Windows 10. We have not been able to reproduce the situation
from that information alone. Many of us
Marcus, the queries I did for identification of open issues found only issues
with no resolution of any kind. That automatically excluded issues with any of
DUPLICATE, ..., WON'T FIX, and CLOSED status.
Older open issues, some from long before Apache OpenOffice was established,
continue to
, August 4, 2015 11:05
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] RE: [DISCUSS] Calendar for New chair of AOO
Hi
it seems there are different opinions on how to handle the rest of the
chair election process.
I suggested a timeline, in the beginning
These accounts don't provide enough information to nail anything down to root
causes, and some of the forum cases are not resolved one way or the other yet.
My main desktop machine upgraded (with my permission) to Windows 10 Pro x64 on
the evening of July 29.
I already had AOO 4.1.1 and
The August Board meeting is on August 19 and I suspect that a resolution to the
Board must be provided on or before August 17. (I couldn't find a different
deadline other than 2 days before.)
My sense is that it is very important to be consistent and deliberate. For me,
August 16 closing of
there is
anything unexpected.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 15:38
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] RE: [DISCUSS] Calendar for New chair of AOO
On Thursday, July 30, 2015, Dennis E
to say this is
Discussion will end 7 days after the last accepted-/self-
Nomination, and no earlier than August 16.
Since August 16 is already on the books, that would not change, but we might
find some slack post-August 16.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton
Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2015 07:29
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] ODF Plugfest, September 2015 (was RE: [NOMINATION]
Dennis Hamilton ... )
On 01/08/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I do not have the means
I am gratified by the endorsements made to me on this thread.
I accept nomination for recommendation as the next Chair for Apache OpenOffice.
Jan's August 16 milestone should give us time to identify other's willing to
serve as Chair and address any questions that the AOO community may have for
Roberto mentions the forthcoming ODF Plugfest to be held September 15-16 at the
Hague.
WHAT THE ODF PLUGFEST IS
Information about the Plugfest is on this Wiki page:
http://plugtest.opendocsociety.org/doku.php?id=plugfests:201509_thehague:info.
To see how these have operated, it is useful to
This is not a nomination statement. It is a comment and a procedural
suggestion.
COMMENT
Jan,
I am certain that you gave deep consideration to your decision to resign. I
trust that you have other pursuits that are more satisfying and that you can
now provide full devotion to. I wish you
It looks like two mileposts are the same, with August 16 (17 days from now)
including Discuss.
I suggest that the Discussion ends August 23 be removed.
I suggest that we can then have Voting ends backed up to August 28, 12 days
from August 16.
This allows some slack time in case there is more
+1 also
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 05:17
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 122712] PDF Export dialog
too tall for some monitor screens
On 18 July 2015 at 00:53, Andrea Pescetti
It need not be the same bug. An SEH Exception: Access Violation usually means
that the hardware detected an invalid access. See
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms679329(v=vs.85).aspx.
In general, an Access Violation is not recoverable, which is how it shows up
as an
I saw this on dev@ a.o and have not read later things here. Forgive me if
there are other recommendations. I trust any solution Kay comes up with.
My suggestion:
Copy 4.1.0 to a 4.1.2 branch. Staunch the problems of difficulty synchronizing
source to distributions and also allow a way to
With regard to the disclosure of email addresses in various ways via Apache
Software Foundation Services, the disclosure of email addresses is rather
widespread.
It appears that the MBox option for obscuring e-mail addresses applies only to
the From: field of an archived post. There is no
THE TL;DR:
I agree. The extensive lag to availability of 4.1.2 is far more pertinent at
the level of the Board Report. The existence of CVE-2015-1774 does not change
that and should not overshadow it.
I think featuring CVE-2015-1774 in the report exaggerates its importance and
ignores the
Principles, Policies, Practices
On 28 June 2015 at 19:49, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
[ ... ]
An example of an exception that is specific to the Apache OpenOffice
project is the distribution of convenience binaries that have writing-aid
plug-ins bundled with them
Thanks Regina, that is great news.
A few somewhat serious items:
1. It is not necessary to pay the ISO/IEC Swiss Franks tax for those
documents. They are available as Publicly Available standards at
http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/index.html. (Scroll
way down to
to find a way to operate without any exceptions.
That will come up when specific opportunities for cooperation and collaboration
are considered.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 13:58
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
In April, Andrea Pescetti provided a great blog post on prospects for
cooperative work among users with shared interest in the OpenOffice code base,
Collaboration is in our DNA:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/collaboration_is_in_our_dna.
That topic and related matters have been discussed
The email addresses of submitters and those who have CC'd themselves are
certainly visible to anyone who creates a Bugzilla account (there are no
limitations), just as to anyone who subscribes to an issues@ list or accesses
an issues@ list archive. People should understand that there is no
I don't recall seeing a privacy policy as part of creating a Bugzilla account.
If you look at the home page at https://bz.apache.org/ooo/ and are logged
in, notice that it shows your email address as who is logged in and who you
would be logging out.
On a bug page, if you click to see who
Thanks Jan,
- Commenting inline to -
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 15:40
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
Subject: Re: AOO Principles for Cooperation among ODF Projects
On 25 June 2015 at 22:58, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
for such interchange working properly
with change-tracking in the files.
Conditions on which such an envelope can be established and change-tracking
accomplished in a dependable way are sketched.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent
[mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2015 13:23
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache@ OSCON 2015 - Booth Goodies
On 06/06/2015 04:30 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Um, 1.5 diameter, as asked. Silly keyboard. Bad keyboard. Bad.
OK, fine. (those dang keyboards
I've never understood this business of having multiple releases as progressions
on the same code branch.
It seems far more confusing than having a branch or tag that corresponds to the
release identifier. It also helps if there is a need for a patch release at a
particular branch.
It also
Um, 1.5 diameter, as asked. Silly keyboard. Bad keyboard. Bad.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 6, 2015 15:34
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Apache@ OSCON 2015 - Booth Goodies
Kay, 1.4 diameter for the AOO
...@apache.org wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
OSCON 2015 is near upon us.
I am offering to do booth duty again this year. I had a great time and
am
happy to do it again.
I have one request.
Can we have bigger Apache OpenOffice
OSCON 2015 is near upon us.
I am offering to do booth duty again this year. I had a great time and am
happy to do it again.
I have one request.
Can we have bigger Apache OpenOffice buttons? The little ones are nice, but I
find they are difficult to put one.
The design need not change, but
of my DChanges 2014 papers on-line yet. I will
do so in the coming week.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 10:50
To: d...@corinthia.incubator.apache.org
Subject: DChanges 2014 Papers Available
The final
I favor option (2) but I think that may be confusing from an administrative
perspective.
In that case, I join Jan in favoring option (3)
An advantage of option (2) is that it can always be retargeted as necessary.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti
+1
Thanks Andreas,
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 04:11
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving forward.
[ ... ]
So I'm volunteering for the part Identify what we want (and can have)
in 4.1.2 and update
Andreas,
Simply wait, for now, I think. It sometimes takes quite a while for updates to
be placed at the Mitre CVE entry.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 09:23
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re:
I think it happens by specifying login and there is an avenue to account
creation then.
I however, don't want to logout and remove my account to see if that is it [;).
-Original Message-
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 10:18
To: OOo Apache
.Maybe
something else wrong?
-Brick
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Yes, the (#define OPTIONAL OPTIONAL) will break many things, even if it
removes a parser error message.
Where the error occurred the first time, there are many lines
Hi!
You are digging into my favorite subject.
I am assuming you are talking about strings within the MathML and that it is in
some form of XML. In that case:
If it is XML, the encoding can be specified in the ? ... ? XML prologue.
Sniffing for this prologue will determine such things as
by preprocessor.
cl /P yields module.i
OPTIONAL was disappeard in module.i
But i have not found where is #define OPTIONAL .
I will search again tomorrow.
-brick
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
You cannot disable the preprocessor
Subject: Re: ruby uno to control openoffice
But with the same PropertyAttribute.hdl i had built c++ sample
DocumentLoader.cxx,and it works .
How can i disable this feature of pre-processor
-Brick
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
It appears
+1 Congratulations, Marcus!
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 04:51
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please join me in congratulating Marcus.
jan i wrote:
Marcus is now member of Apache Software Foundation.
It appears that OPTIONAL is defined to empty string in a pre-processor
definition.
This is probably a conflict with use of OPTIONAL as a way of controlling code
inclusion and not as name of a feature in a bit flag [;).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Brick Ma
Hello Buddhi,
I think Regina or Ariel may have the information you require. Also, see
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO,
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7,
and
Any replies should go to d...@community.apache.org
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 07:44
To: dev
Subject: Fwd: ACNA Presentation Template
Hey, OpenOffice folks, any chance you can update last year's
presentation
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gusaas [mailto:larry.gus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 20:54
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java 8 and AOO
On 2015-03-17, 6:41 PM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
The problems I've seen reported are apparently all on MacOS
Submission of applications by students opened on March 16 and the student's
proposed statement of work must be finalized by March 27. It appears that
there is not much opportunity to have identified areas for AOO and also
establish mentors so that students have something to apply for and make
: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 17:42
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Java 8 and AOO
The problems I've seen reported are apparently all on MacOS. Something about
needing a legacy Java 6 to work and there is no way for the user
The problems I've seen reported are apparently all on MacOS. Something about
needing a legacy Java 6 to work and there is no way for the user to accomplish
that, apparently.
Are there others?
Do you think the message is from AOO instead of the OS?
There is also a crasher in Base, apparently,
Since resolving Priority #1, we have not returned to Andrea's list of
priorities.
The #2 from the list seems critical to everything else.
2) Internal reorganization: people say what they are going to
do to drive the project forward (so an active approach
rather than the I don't
I received the SDCard with the 150GB SVN dump from Rob in yesterday's postal
delivery.
Herbert Duerr has also provided some tips on using the Zipped git repo that he
created.
I will set up a notebook for keeping track of everything I (attempt to) do. It
will be interesting to watch that SVN
Thanks for the information. It is not clear what can be done about this.
There will be some investigation to determine what can be done.
- Dennis
I notice that Yahoo has already determined that they cannot recommend the site.
It is interesting what http://us.com has as a business model
Apache OpenOffice is written primarily in C++.
There are means to integration with Java.
There is an API that is available as part of the OpenOffice SDK. See this
information: http://www.openoffice.org/api/SDK/. Note that this page has not
been updated since 2008 and there may be difficulties
openoffice sdk for this.
Regards,
Purushottam
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Please say more. Are you saying you want the bookmark to be on an image so
it can be referred to using the bookmark?
Is the problem that the bookmark exists
More spam on the Bugzilla.
-Original Message-
From: bugzi...@apache.org [mailto:bugzi...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 04:37
To: iss...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [Issue 95672] Look and feel of the education website
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=95672
Is it correct to assume that we are speaking of documentation and,
specifically, material for the OpenOffice.org wiki and web site?
If the idea is to maintain the core material on only one place, you need to
decide what is the upstream source. It seems to me that means the place with
the
Please say more. Are you saying you want the bookmark to be on an image so it
can be referred to using the bookmark?
Is the problem that the bookmark exists already and you want to replace the
text with an image?
Did you place the bookmark on a range of text or just at a point in the text?
I am not certain exactly what issue is proposed to be discussed here.
If you mean the over-use of private@ by the PMC, is there an issue to discuss?
Those of us on the PMC need to be attentive to minimizing private@ discussions
and bring to dev@ every discussion that is not one of the special
@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: community communication versus private PMC communication, WAS: PMC
FAQ update
On Saturday, March 7, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
I am not certain exactly what issue is proposed to be discussed here.
If you mean the over
-- replying below to --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 06:03
To: dev
Subject: Re: PMC FAQ update
On 6 March 2015 at 14:36, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
[ ... ]
OK! One last attempt to clarify and resolve a trivial issue, that has
become clouded in
I am aligned with Simon and Louis on this.
Part of the reason for knowing who moderators and administrators are is for
transparency. Civil names (sometimes pseudonyms, such as RGB-ES) could be
used, although (optional?) Apache IDs are very handy too.
Another reason is so if someone goes
+1 Yes, that is pretty clean, especially with regard to the tone.
-Original Message-
From: marcus [mailto:mar...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 14:10
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Jim Jagielski
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Inappropriate Compliance Costs
Am 03/01/2015 01:31 PM,
for the Computer History Museum.
It seems that there may be a meaningful check with the materials that Herbert
Duerr have collected as well.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 12:51
To: dev
I'm going to add my +1 to this proposal.
It occurred to me, when looking into the old OOo SVN dumps that Rob has, that
there may be many more downstream users that are on Git and that our being on
Git would facilitate accepting appropriately-offered pull requests to the AOO
repository. It
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 14:11
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
-- replying inline to --
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Saturday
).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 12:29
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
orcmid
Is the source code in this SVN identified as LGPL, along with
any
-- replying inline to --
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:38
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Some old OOo SVN dumps, of use to anyone?
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 7:22 PM,
of interest at the same time.
-- Dennis E. Hamilton
orc...@apache.org
dennis.hamil...@acm.org+1-206-779-9430
https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A
X.509 certs used and requested for signed e-mail
Thanks for the analysis Jonathon,
1. The edge case I was thinking of was being able to obtain a bounty of up to
$1 million USD. It is actually a formula based on the amount obtained in a
settlement that is obtained *without* litigation. The edge case is that
happening where the settlement
that redistribution of AOO within an organization was acceptable.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 07:55
To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org'
Cc: 'Jim Jagielski'
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Inappropriate Compliance Costs
Please
Please note that I have also included Jim Jagielski in this reply, although he
has reported that he does not follow dev@ here. I suspect continuing to do
this is an intrusion on him, yet providing a BCC or separate forward seems
inappropriate as well.
I have not seen a [Vote][Result] on the
-- replying below to --
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 09:56
To: OOo Apache
Subject: Re: OpenOffice for Firefox OS
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Hi,
the German news service Heise Online has reported
+1 nicely done, Kay and Herbert
-Original Message-
From: Herbert Duerr [mailto:h...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 04:23
To: d...@community.apache.org
Cc: qa
Subject: Re: recent BZ changes -- some custom fields missing?
Hi Kay,
We had an update to our BZ instance about a
+1 and kudos to Keith
(Side question: Is there some location where it is known who has the keys/karma
to administration various services under AOO?)
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 23:47
To:
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 11:58
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [Vote] What should we do with the Why Compliance? page on the website
The page in question is here:
I favor the option proposed by Tim Williams. I think a good interim maneuver
is to remove the sidebar link and then we can fuss about the page ad lib. I
haven't checked on the notice that Marcus put up just yet. If that stays, it
needs to ripple through the translations too.
If I have to
I think you are not seeing anything about Unicode because ODF is fully Unicode
and so is Apache OpenOffice and it is taken for granted. It came with being
based on XML.
I think you are asking something not about use of Unicode but perhaps having
fonts the support the characters you are
PROPOSAL: Remove the page link from the sidebar, so that the controversial page
is no longer reachable from other pages on the site. Do this in all languages
having the page.
We can then continue this discussion about the page itself, whether it is to be
recast in some manner, whether the
+1 on change or removal
It is perhaps more useful to follow the thread view of the conversation that
resumed today on the legal-discuss mailing list,
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201502.mbox/thread.
Some suggestions have been voiced there too.
Anyone can also
1 Andrea
-Original Message-
From: Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) [mailto:r...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 06:15
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair
On 18.02.2015 20:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 08/02/2015 Andrea
+1
Nice idea and great attention to progressive staging.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: acolor...@gmail.com [mailto:acolor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexandro
Colorado
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 14:41
To: dev
Subject: Updating the wiki theme.
I would like to update the
We use Git on the Corinthia incubator.
For Apache committers, there is not much difference in how one makes commits
and it is much easier to work on branches for anyone. Using clones does add a
step between change and commits at the Apache origin repo, as Yuri observes.
Users of SVN who have
I just checked https://openoffice.org and https://www.openoffice.org and saw no
certificate problems. I also did a Google search on Open Office and saw no
suspicious links in the first results. All the ones to Apache OpenOffice
locations work just fine. Your search will also produce results
+1 and Hip, Hip, Hooray!
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 11:47
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair
On 08/02/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I will send a
of the
warning. Normally, I wouldn't go on a website if I got that warning (b/c
the warning screen from google recommended NOT continuing to the site) but
since I've used Open Office before I did.
Brenda
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 1:12 PM
To: dev
Of Alexandro
Colorado
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 13:58
To: dev; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: Moving code from oooforum to mwiki
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
It seems to me that the mwiki is the best place, based on the origin
-- replying in-line to --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 14:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: OOo4Kids OOoLight Status
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
+1,
Nice
+1,
Nice thinking, Guy.
Perhaps a bit more work and resource to make this customizable, and a great
idea. This also matters for enterprise deployments and such. That, along with
customized template sets can be very important in certain areas of application.
We still have the original
I recommend something more neutral such as Starter, Intermediate, and Full or
some equivalent, so it is about the interface, not the user of it. The default
on an install could be Starter in the absence of an existing user configuration.
Should we consider having the skins simply be options on
Do you mean that you do not receive a direct copy of the Bugzilla notice where
you are the creator or on the CC list for an issue?
I just submitted a Bugzilla comment. I received two copies: the list copy and
a direct copy on [Issue 126098].
Perhaps there was a change that interferes with
-- replying in-line to --
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 10:01
To: OOo Apache
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.
[ ... ]
I'm just curious about these statements. Have potential new developers
remarked on this to you?
Since most IDEs
Got it. Sorry for wasting everyone's time.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 04:49
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
OK. Then what
-- replying in-line to --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 13:36
To: dev; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.
On 14 February 2015 at 22:27, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
Corinthia has its code tree (not web site
are read-only or my
pairing is not working. I am not certain how to tell the difference.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:41
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git
501 - 600 of 882 matches
Mail list logo
