Re: Buildbots update

Damjan Jovanovic wrote: I've asked infra to get LWP::Protocol::https installed on all the buildbots and they're working on it. Thanks for debugging, this will hopefully solve it. So indeed the issue is on the buildbots side but it was related to SourceForge now enforcing HTTPS do

Re: Buildbots update

tocol::https not installed)) I've asked infra to get LWP::Protocol::https installed on all the buildbots and they're working on it. We also need to update our build instructions to install it when building. On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > [top posting] > >

Re: Buildbots update

ch is correct for the PWD specified) -- "The variable TARFILE_LOCATION is set to: /home/buildslave20/slave20/openoffice-linux32-nightly/build/ext_sources" so conceptually NO downloads from 3rd party locations should happen at all in normal building with the buildbots since they have the cor

Re: Buildbots update

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: > >> On 02/13/2016 11:45 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> it seems that buildbots are having issues with network in general >>> >> Do we have any additional news on the

Re: Buildbots update

Kay Schenk wrote: On 02/13/2016 11:45 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: it seems that buildbots are having issues with network in general Do we have any additional news on the download failures specifically from the buildbots to SourceForge downloads? Why SourceForge? Look at https://ci.apache.org

Re: Buildbots update

On 02/13/2016 11:45 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> The buildbots are all failing to download 15 dependencies every night >> now. I think something is wrong with access to SourceForge :-(. > > Well, from what I see for example here > https:

Re: Buildbots update

Damjan Jovanovic wrote: The buildbots are all failing to download 15 dependencies every night now. I think something is wrong with access to SourceForge :-(. Well, from what I see for example here https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux64-nightly/builds/240/steps/retry%20bootstrap/logs

Re: Buildbots update

09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>>>> >>>>> All the *nix buildbots are now green and should be building 100% reliably. >>>> >>>> YAY! >>>> >>> >>> I jinxed it, many bots failed in ./bootstrap as they couldn't do

Re: Buildbots update

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 02/11/2016 09:30 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>>> >>>> All th

Re: Buildbots update

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 02/11/2016 09:30 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>>> >>>> All th

Re: Buildbots update

On 02/11/2016 09:30 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> >>> All the *nix buildbots are now green and should be building 100% reliably. >> >>

Re: Buildbots update

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >> All the *nix buildbots are now green and should be building 100% reliably. > > YAY! > I jinxed it, many bots failed in ./bootstrap as they couldn't

Re: Buildbots update

On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > Most of the common problems with the buildbots have been fixed: > * The Windows buildbots were failing to determine the SVN revision > being built, showing "UNKNOWN". This was fixed by running the "svn > i

Buildbots update

Hi Most of the common problems with the buildbots have been fixed: * The Windows buildbots were failing to determine the SVN revision being built, showing "UNKNOWN". This was fixed by running the "svn info" command under Cygwin, as the Windows build bots do not have the Wi

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 21 Jul, To: p...@apache.org wrote: > Doing > pkg install clang35 > > adding this to the configure script > CPP=clang-cpp35 CC=clang35 CXX=clang++35 && export CPP CC CXX && On FreeBSD configure still needs "CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include" in its environment. Looks like that got dropped when

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Thanks to Pedro and Don for hanging in there with these changes! It's great that we finally have a freebsd build! YAY! On 07/15/2015 02:23 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > Hi Don, > > This is great work, thanks! > > I’m going to try this on our Buildbot tomorrow. > > Gav… > >> On 15 Jul 2015, at 6

Re: Build trouble (was Re: Are the Buildbots down?)

On 15 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > And here comes one of the huge can of worms in OpenOffice: > we are using a very old version of ICU. > > The truth is, we have code to update ICU to a more recent > version resting peacefully somewhere in the Symphony branch. > The IBM (China) guys that wrote it

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Hi Don, This is great work, thanks! I’m going to try this on our Buildbot tomorrow. Gav… > On 15 Jul 2015, at 6:33 pm, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 15 Jul, Don Lewis wrote: > >> I'll install clang35 from ports and try again. > > Success! > > This is with trunk r1690992 and no additional patches

Re: Build trouble (was Re: Are the Buildbots down?)

Hi Don; On 07/15/15 15:49, Don Lewis wrote: On 15 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: And here comes one of the huge can of worms in OpenOffice: we are using a very old version of ICU. The truth is, we have code to update ICU to a more recent version resting peacefully somewhere in the Symphony branch.

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 15 Jul, Don Lewis wrote: > I'll install clang35 from ports and try again. Success! This is with trunk r1690992 and no additional patches. *** Successful packaging process! ***

Build trouble (was Re: Are the Buildbots down?)

On 07/14/15 23:33, Don Lewis wrote: ... It appears that hunspell has a way of generating that header in the that location on systems that don't have gettext, but for whatever reason it decided not to do so. The real problem is this fragment of ext_libraries/hunspell/makefile.mk: .ELIF "$(OS)"

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 14 Jul, Don Lewis wrote: > At this point, I'm going to back out the patch above, and remove > CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS from the environment passed to build. I'll pass > LIBINTL_PREFIX instead to fix he hunspell issue. This is looking real good. This time the build got far enough to tickle the cl

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 14 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > On 07/14/15 02:32, Don Lewis wrote: >> Next problem: >> >> /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link c++ -g -O2 -o chmorph >> chmorph.o ../parsers/libparsers.a ../hunspell/libhunspell-1.3.la >> libtool: link: c++ -g -O2 -o chmorph chmorph.o ../parser

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 14 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > On 07/14/15 01:37, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>> Hmm ... >>> >>> Perhaps there is something wrong here: >>> >>> tmain/libxml2/prj/d.lst >> Perhaps ... but since libxml is already installed on the system because >> it is a prerequisit

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 14 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > On 07/13/15 23:33, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> >>> I did notice the buildbot was failing on nss(?). >>> That's what I get for taking hunks from elsewhere :-P. >> Patch below ... > > Committed as revision 1690992. > Thanks! > >>> A

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 07/14/15 02:32, Don Lewis wrote: Next problem: /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link c++ -g -O2 -o chmorph chmorph.o ../parsers/libparsers.a ../hunspell/libhunspell-1.3.la libtool: link: c++ -g -O2 -o chmorph chmorph.o ../parsers/libparsers.a ../hunspell/.libs/libhunspell-1.3.

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 07/14/15 01:37, Don Lewis wrote: On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hmm ... Perhaps there is something wrong here: tmain/libxml2/prj/d.lst Perhaps ... but since libxml is already installed on the system because it is a prerequisite of some of the other dependencies, such as java, gconf2, an

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 07/13/15 23:33, Don Lewis wrote: On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: I did notice the buildbot was failing on nss(?). That's what I get for taking hunks from elsewhere :-P. Patch below ... Committed as revision 1690992. Thanks! As you might have noticed I don't spend much quality time wit

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Next problem: /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link c++ -g -O2 -o chmorph chmorph.o ../parsers/libparsers.a ../hunspell/libhunspell-1.3.la libtool: link: c++ -g -O2 -o chmorph chmorph.o ../parsers/libparsers.a ../hunspell/.libs/libhunspell-1.3.a c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > Hmm ... > > Perhaps there is something wrong here: > > tmain/libxml2/prj/d.lst Perhaps ... but since libxml is already installed on the system because it is a prerequisite of some of the other dependencies, such as java, gconf2, and gnome-vfs, I just switched

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Next problem ... libxml2 deliver deliver -- version: 275594 Module 'libxml2' delivered successfully. 50 files copied, 2 files unchanged = Building module libxslt = [snip] Disabling crypto support Enabling debugger checking for libxml libraries >= 2.6.27... 2.7.8 found ch

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > I did notice the buildbot was failing on nss(?). > That's what I get for taking hunks from elsewhere :-P. Patch below ... > As you might have noticed I don't spend much quality time > with AOO lately :-(. I've been spending too much B-( Index: main/nss/makefil

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > I did notice the buildbot was failing on nss(?). > That's what I get for taking hunks from elsewhere :-P. Working on a patch for that ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.ap

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 07/13/15 20:06, Don Lewis wrote: On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On 07/13/15 11:29, Don Lewis wrote: ... OpenOffice has a clang patch that was not catching this. I hacked it for FreeBSD now: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1690740 But there is certainly something wron

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > On 07/13/15 11:29, Don Lewis wrote: > ... >> OpenOffice has a clang patch that was not catching this. >> I hacked it for FreeBSD now: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1690740 >> >> But there is certainly something wrong as clang is not b

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 07/13/15 11:29, Don Lewis wrote: ... OpenOffice has a clang patch that was not catching this. I hacked it for FreeBSD now: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1690740 But there is certainly something wrong as clang is not being detected. I think clang defines __GNUC__, so wi

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > On 07/13/15 02:06, Don Lewis wrote: > ... >> >> According to the bootstrap log, it's not a download problem. >> >> I'm able to reproduce the problem here. It looks like clang doesn't >> like some of the code in CoinMP: >> >> In file included from ClpSolve.cp

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 13 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > > On 07/13/15 02:06, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 12 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >>> Hi Gavin; >>> >>> Let me copy Don Lewis, who maintains the FreeBSD port @FreeBSD ... >>> >>> On 07/12/15 12:59, Gavin McDonald wrote: > On 12 Jul 2015, at 4:50 pm, Pedro Giffuni >>

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 07/13/15 02:06, Don Lewis wrote: ... According to the bootstrap log, it's not a download problem. I'm able to reproduce the problem here. It looks like clang doesn't like some of the code in CoinMP: In file included from ClpSolve.cpp:347: /tmp/openoffice/aoo-4.2.0/ext_libraries/coinmp/un

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 07/13/15 02:06, Don Lewis wrote: On 12 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi Gavin; Let me copy Don Lewis, who maintains the FreeBSD port @FreeBSD ... On 07/12/15 12:59, Gavin McDonald wrote: On 12 Jul 2015, at 4:50 pm, Pedro Giffuni mailto:p...@apache.org>> wrote: Hello; On 07/11/15 10:39, Ped

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Just for giggles, I tried "build --from nss" and got this: make[2]: Entering directory '/tmp/openoffice/aoo-4.2.0/main/nss/unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/nss-3.14.4/mozilla/security/coreconf/nsinstall' gcc -o out/nsinstall.o -c -O -fPIC -ansi -Wall -Wno-switch -DFREEBSD -DHAVE_STRERROR -DHAVE_BSD_FLOCK

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

On 12 Jul, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hi Gavin; > > Let me copy Don Lewis, who maintains the FreeBSD port @FreeBSD ... > > On 07/12/15 12:59, Gavin McDonald wrote: >> >>> On 12 Jul 2015, at 4:50 pm, Pedro Giffuni >> > wrote: >>> >>> Hello; >>> >>> On 07/11/15 10:39, Pedro Giff

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Hi Gavin; Let me copy Don Lewis, who maintains the FreeBSD port @FreeBSD ... On 07/12/15 12:59, Gavin McDonald wrote: On 12 Jul 2015, at 4:50 pm, Pedro Giffuni > wrote: Hello; On 07/11/15 10:39, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; On 07/11/15 05:39, Marcus wrote: Am 07/11

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

> On 12 Jul 2015, at 4:50 pm, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > Hello; > > On 07/11/15 10:39, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> Hello; >> >> On 07/11/15 05:39, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 07/11/2015 11:31 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald: The ‘open office-fbsd-nightly’ fails the ‘build —all’ step and needs investi

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Hello; On 07/11/15 10:39, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello; On 07/11/15 05:39, Marcus wrote: Am 07/11/2015 11:31 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald: The ‘open office-fbsd-nightly’ fails the ‘build —all’ step and needs investigating. 1 module(s): coinmp need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Hello; On 07/11/15 05:39, Marcus wrote: Am 07/11/2015 11:31 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald: The ‘open office-fbsd-nightly’ fails the ‘build —all’ step and needs investigating. 1 module(s): coinmp need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/home/buildslave

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Am 07/11/2015 11:31 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald: The ‘open office-fbsd-nightly’ fails the ‘build —all’ step and needs investigating. 1 module(s): coinmp need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/home/buildslave27/slave27/openoffice-fbsd-nightly/bui

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Am 07/11/2015 11:31 AM, schrieb Gavin McDonald: Thanks, There is still more to do. I have changed the information provided on this page: https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ Before, Andrew Rist had been using wget to scrape results of builds i

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Thanks, There is still more to do. I have changed the information provided on this page: https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ Before, Andrew Rist had been using wget to scrape results of builds into a nice table layout. However, since I moved

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/09/2015 02:57 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > >> On 9 Jul 2015, at 9:26 am, Regina Henschel >> mailto:rb.hensc...@t-online.de>> >> wrote: >> >> JZA schrieb: >>> Hi wonder if the Nightly builds down for AOO? >>> >> >> Yes there are problems. You

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

; still refers to AOO 4.1.1 builds. Correct. If the buildbots were working, you should use these for "development" builds even though the options might be limited in terms of language. The area you reference above has only been used for final builds before a release, for release

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

> On 9 Jul 2015, at 9:26 am, Regina Henschel wrote: > > JZA schrieb: >> Hi wonder if the Nightly builds down for AOO? >> > > Yes there are problems. You can look why it fails on > https://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/9 > https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/build

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

Hello! I use the thread to ask if there any links to the actual development builds. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-fullsets still refers to AOO 4.1.1 builds. Thanks! Mathias ---

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

JZA schrieb: Hi wonder if the Nightly builds down for AOO? Yes there are problems. You can look why it fails on https://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/9 https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/9 https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/

Are the Buildbots down?

Hi wonder if the Nightly builds down for AOO? -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 11/15/13 6:54 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: > > I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that > > keeps coming up. > > first of all thanks for the summarized update > > > > > * We

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On 18 November 2013 08:56, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 11/15/13 6:54 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: > > I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that > > keeps coming up. > > first of all thanks for the summarized update > > > > > * We

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On 11/15/13 6:54 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: > I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that > keeps coming up. first of all thanks for the summarized update > > * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long >story short, the cur

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On 15 November 2013 20:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Andrew Rist wrote: > >> * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. ... >> We are waiting for real hardware in the form of a Mac Pro >> which will enable us to have multiple virtualized mac bots, giving >> us our own environment

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

Andrew Rist wrote: * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. ... We are waiting for real hardware in the form of a Mac Pro which will enable us to have multiple virtualized mac bots, giving us our own environment that can be set up for AOO. The machine should be ordered by the

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

Really promizing and great news. Thanks for the detailed update. Marcus Am 11/15/2013 06:54 PM, schrieb Andrew Rist: I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that keeps coming up. * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long story short

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

[top posting] Thank you for this update! :) On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Andrew Rist wrote: > I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that > keeps coming up. > > * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long >story sh

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that keeps coming up. * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long story short, the current mac hardware is a bit long in the tooth and we would kill everything on it if we added our builds t

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Glenn Harvey Liwanag wrote: > I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're looking > for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I have to > know first the average build time and the instructions to get the whole > thing don

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

School for the week is over. Let me just configure this SVN repo thing (I use Git, sorry) and the whole environment. A couple of questions - Am I right to presume that I need the 4 GB trunk to start building? - What set of details do you guys need from me? On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:01 AM

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Glenn Harvey Liwanag < glennharveyliwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're looking > for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I have to > know first the average build time and the instructi

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're looking for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I have to know first the average build time and the instructions to get the whole thing done without academics interfering with the work. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013

buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

Regarding Jürgen's comments on a recent thread -- http://markmail.org/message/v5zli2np67qv5ryz Since CentOS 5 is our reference distribution for delivered Linux binaries (I did not know this!) -- and I am assuming this distro might remain as the reference going forward, does it make sense to try

Re: Additional languages for buildbots

On 30-Aug-13 4:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 13/08/2013 Herbert Duerr wrote: On 13.08.2013 08:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Before we forget, can we add to it at least zh-TW (unsure about the right syntax) km pl kid ? The first 3 languages are 100% complete in Pootle, "kid" is the KeyID and it'

Re: Additional languages for buildbots

On 13/08/2013 Herbert Duerr wrote: On 13.08.2013 08:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Before we forget, can we add to it at least zh-TW (unsure about the right syntax) km pl kid ? The first 3 languages are 100% complete in Pootle, "kid" is the KeyID and it's useful to translators. I now added "km" and

Re: Additional languages for buildbots

is not too bad - the disk space issue is under control now and we have space for languages as they become available. That's great news, thanks! The snapshot tag is currently only moved sporadically so spending time in setting up new snapshot buildbots for e.g. Linux is an arguable inves

Re: Additional languages for buildbots

started working again. With the additional languages we are stressing it a bit more now though. Actually, the situation is not too bad - the disk space issue is under control now and we have space for languages as they become available. The snapshot tag is currently only moved sporadically so

Re: Additional languages for buildbots

ag is currently only moved sporadically so spending time in setting up new snapshot buildbots for e.g. Linux is an arguable investment. For most cases the already existing nightly builds are better. Herbert - To unsubscribe,

Additional languages for buildbots

I see that yesterday's buildbot run completed successfully http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/#winsnap (even though, since we are still building the SNAPSHOT tag, running that buildbot is only testing that the buildbot works). This is the only one where we support localization at the momen

Re: OS for main AOO buildbots

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > Hi Kay, > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 04:33:05PM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: > > Well, Ok. I think we need to maintain a secure environment with > > anything used for our builds -- libraries, etc. That would be my only > > concern with "old

Re: OS for main AOO buildbots

Hi Kay, On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 04:33:05PM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote: > Well, Ok. I think we need to maintain a secure environment with > anything used for our builds -- libraries, etc. That would be my only > concern with "older" items. CentOS 5 is currently being maintained; in fact, the "latest

Re: OS for main AOO buildbots

Hi, On 03.04.2013 00:37, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Andrew Rist wrote: What version of CentOS do we want on this machine? We want the snapshot builds to be fully usable. I'll write here the reasoning behind this, so that it can be corrected if needed. Ariel's special version available at http://

Re: OS for main AOO buildbots

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Andrew Rist wrote: > >> What version of CentOS do we want on this machine? We want the snapshot >> builds to be fully usable. >> > > I'll write here the reasoning behind this, so that it can be corrected if > needed. > > Ariel's special ver

Re: OS for main AOO buildbots

Andrew Rist wrote: What version of CentOS do we want on this machine? We want the snapshot builds to be fully usable. I'll write here the reasoning behind this, so that it can be corrected if needed. Ariel's special version available at http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ uses glibc 2.5. It

Re: OS for main AOO buildbots

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: > In discussions with infra, (mine and Andrea's) an idea has been hatched to > create a CentOS buildbot. > This would replace the defunct linux32 bot (previously ubuntu 10.4). > In addition to changing the OS, we will also build this on the machi

OS for main AOO buildbots

In discussions with infra, (mine and Andrea's) an idea has been hatched to create a CentOS buildbot. This would replace the defunct linux32 bot (previously ubuntu 10.4). In addition to changing the OS, we will also build this on the machine currently hosting the linux64 build. That bot has a who

Re: linux 32 buildbots offline, does anyone know anything about this

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Andrew Rist wrote: > > On 3/22/2013 9:19 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It seems the linux 32-bit buildbot processes have been offline for about a >> week. >> > > Actually, they've been down for a bit longer than that. We had kind of > overwhelmed the avail

Re: linux 32 buildbots offline, does anyone know anything about this

On 3/22/2013 9:19 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: Hi, It seems the linux 32-bit buildbot processes have been offline for about a week. Actually, they've been down for a bit longer than that. We had kind of overwhelmed the available resources, so we were waiting for the new VM host to come online. I

linux 32 buildbots offline, does anyone know anything about this

Hi, It seems the linux 32-bit buildbot processes have been offline for about a week. See: http://ci.apache.org/builders Does anyone know anything about this, or should we submit a ticket to infra? Thanks. --

<    1   2