Re: OS2 code

On 19.01.21 01:05, Steve Lubbs wrote: Hi Michael, Comments inline in red. On 1/18/21 2:03 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote: Hi, I think we have to differ between responsibility and merit and support. To my mind responsibility implies support. Support implies ongoing coding, testing, and bug

SCONS development state

Hello Dylan, Hello Ho Wang, I am sorry it took me a while. But here Damjan explains all about the SCONS implementation. Please if still time and interest is there have a look. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r911b40a582019f641e93253df07341370cb9aeb9d1dc50474e48aa09%40%3Cdev.openoffice.

Re: AOO - OS/X Big Sur (a.k.a. Big Burr in my side!)

Hi Marc, How about testing the upcomming release? Currently in the state of Release Candidate 1. You can download the Version at [1]. Please keep the 4.1.8 Version, since this is only for testing, and not within the update stream. Looking forward to read your feedback. All the best Peter

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info RC! verification Report

I know. I have time tomorrow morning :( Probably the folder has wrong rights. Am 15. Januar 2021 18:41:23 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel : >Hi Peter, > >Am 13.01.21 um 23:53 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> >> On 12.01.21 22:33, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> >>> On 12.01.2

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info RC! verification Report

On 12.01.21 22:33, Peter Kovacs wrote: On 12.01.21 11:44, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Dave, @Peter: Is it possible to replace 418 with 419 in OpenGrok? I just have seen this. I will update tomorrow. I have added a 4.1.9 checkout. Index is ongoing. Will report back tomorrow. -- This is the

Re: RETABLIR LA VERSION FRANCAISE

On 13.01.21 11:05, Czesław Wolański wrote: Did you rule out the possibility that GEORGES ( no screaming intended ;‑) ) is looking for a way to change the language (Tools > Options > Language Settings)? No I did not. :) Thanks for that Idea. The translation might had its flaws, and my french

Re: [discussion] rename the recruitment list

questions about the philosophy of the project itself, and about its organization. Please see below. On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:25:14AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, I wonder if we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My theory is that a lot of people do not understand OpenSo

Re: RETABLIR LA VERSION FRANCAISE

Writing in caps is considered as screaming. Why do you scream? Visit: https://www.openoffice.org/download/ 1. Select System (usually the correct one is selected. 2. Select your language 3. select Version (the latest version is recommendet.) On 11.01.21 11:26, GEORGES BERTOMEU wrote: COMMENT

[discussion] rename the recruitment list

Hello all, I wonder if we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My theory is that a lot of people do not understand OpenSource in general, and recruitment is commonly strongly linked with Job offers. So have the theory people write us with the hope on a job. Maybe a better name

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info RC! verification Report

On 12.01.21 11:44, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Dave, @Peter: Is it possible to replace 418 with 419 in OpenGrok? I just have seen this. I will update tomorrow. -- This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html ---

Re: pi 4 port update

What am I doing wrong... - Original Message - From: "marcia wilbur" To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 5:43:34 PM Subject: Re: pi 4 port update Hi Peter, Currently cosv on pi. I think I will start fresh - install what depends I can prior. or... if i can fix

Re: [proposal} Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort

On 11.01.21 20:58, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 1/11/2021 1:04 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Keith, If documentation is being moved to Gitbox/GitHub then we should use a new repository. OpenOffice-Docs or something else? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone OpenOffice-Docs sounds good to me. The o

Re: [PROPOSAL] add an unsubscribe/help footer to recruitment ML

On 10.01.21 23:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 09/01/2021 Carl Marcum wrote: It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML. I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with dev@ and some others. +1 and Infra can indeed add it. But we should also be

Re: OpenOffice for Mac OS Big Sur 11.1

Hi Jon, On 10.01.21 03:51, john.yohe wrote: Gentlemen, Thank you for all your replies. I'd be interested in helping with OpenOffice, but I'm also now using LibreOffice, which I'm liking a lot: It's a lot smoother with using and converting Word/docx files. That is fine. No Problem. I don't u

Re: OpenOffice for Mac OS Big Sur 11.1

Hi John, As Biduille said, we are in the Process to Release 4.1.9. Currently we are in the Process to create a release Candidate. These Release Candidates are not realy something you should use as a regular installations, but for testing if this Version works. We need the feedback from teste

Re: [PROPOSAL] add an unsubscribe/help footer to recruitment ML

+1 On 09.01.21 01:43, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi All, It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML. I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with dev@ and some others. Sorry this is a proposal without a known solution (on my part) but I suspect a t

Re: Shall "dmake clean" also remove "$INPATH.pro" directories?

Hi On 01.01.21 18:41, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Dear All, we recently fixed the "dmake clean" problem that deleted the whole source tree, in certain condition, instead of the $INPATH directories [1]. Shall the command also delete the "$INPATH.pro" directories? On my system, they are: ./main/ap

Re: When will the blog post be published?

On 06.01.21 19:21, Marcus wrote: Am 06.01.21 um 08:45 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: Am I overlooking the publication of the blog post or is it still unpublished? imho: Dave said it correctly in his email that the consensus was to publish the blog post first (and work on the new release in parallel)

Re: Happy new year!

Happy new Year every one! On 01.01.21 23:06, Matthias Seidel wrote: Happy new year to all of you! Let's make 2021 a great year for Apache OpenOffice! Regards,    Matthias -- This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html --

Re: Documenting what I'm learning

Great, BTW I did some graphs on confluence wiki concerning the build perl script. Dontbknow where exactly something with development. Am 31. Dezember 2020 02:02:16 MEZ schrieb Steve Lubbs : >Hi All, > >I've been spending quite a bit of time reverse engineering the >threading >and concurrency imp

Re: My last advance notice regarding Big Sur (was: What we should do now)

Hello Jörg, This is not how things are done. I read your mail as blackmail and toxic. Just don't do such stuff. Actions like this puts the feeling on myself that I should do something, because otherwise something 'wrong' will happen. I would rather let you edit the page instead of giving you th

Re: Test of AOO-dev 4.19

The GailWindow error commes from the GTK+. I have looked into that without finding the source. However, I think a lot of GTK application have that message, so may well be this is something more general. However in generall our GTK implementation is flawed. We call some wrong functions, I docum

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?

On 30.12.20 00:08, Dave Fisher wrote: On Dec 29, 2020, at 11:50 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: On Tue., 29 Dec. 2020, 05:55 Jörg Schmidt, wrote: Much easier, and imho functionally sufficient, would be a footer on each archive page informing that this is an archive page plus a link to the s

Re: Proposed change for download page

On 29.12.20 18:25, Dave Fisher wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2020, at 8:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:  -Original Message- From: Bidouille [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 3:02 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Proposed change for downlo

Re: Language subsets

On 29.12.20 14:26, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 12:31:08PM +0100, Marcus wrote: Am 29.12.20 um 11:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski: It's been suggested that before we do an actual RC1, it might be a Good Idea to have a Developer's Test Build of all platforms available for a quick

Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

On 28.12.20 23:54, Marcus wrote: Am 28.12.20 um 20:32 schrieb Marcus: Am 28.12.20 um 19:11 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 28.12.20 15:40, Marcus wrote: We would then only learn of it if people run into issues. I rather have them write a short mail to dev list, as I have suggested it in the

Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

On 28.12.20 15:40, Marcus wrote: Am 28.12.20 um 14:13 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 28.12.20 13:17, Jim Jagielski wrote: Playing devil's advocate here: does it make sense to actually post a blog article about this and then, maybe a week later, have the article moot with the actual re

Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

On 28.12.20 13:17, Jim Jagielski wrote: Playing devil's advocate here: does it make sense to actually post a blog article about this and then, maybe a week later, have the article moot with the actual release? Yes I think it is worth it and we should train to do such things more often. First

Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

Thanks Jörg! Good move. I moved the parent to 4.1.9 Release notes and added the link to the section pre release blog post On 27.12.20 18:20, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM To: dev@openoffic

Re: Collection of material for a blog post on Big Sur (was: Addition in release notes because of Big Sur )

On 27.12.20 15:29, Jörg Schmidt wrote: That, Peter, I also do not think! My formulations were not an outline taken in advance, but only 4 orders that should be filled with info, as a basis, as an orientation for the actual text of the blog post. sure, I just thought if we follwo this way,

Re: Collection of material for a blog post on Big Sur (was: Addition in release notes because of Big Sur )

I don't think a FaQ Format would be the right way to write about this issue.  I suggest something along the lines: Dear OpenOffice Users Thank you for taking interest into OpenOffice and your ongoing support over the years. As of late as you have heared through various channels, an Issue ha

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

On 26.12.20 20:45, Jim Jagielski wrote: So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS BigSur is unknown. It is this: diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx b/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx index f4d6c56..2ca9b8f 1

Re: New Committer: Arrigo Marchiori

Welcome Arrigo, I am very happy you have received the committer bit. And this is a start of a journey together. All the best and Merry Christmas! Peter On 26.12.20 22:19, Marcus wrote: The Apache OpenOffice project is happy to have a new committer on board: Arrigo Marchiori Please give hi

Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)

How about we make a blog post instead? We can describe What the impact is. What Versions are affected. Where our research is. And what our plans are. On 25.12.20 16:52, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:wave4d...@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, December

Re: Security vulnerabilities in AOO?

Hi all, On 22.12.20 20:24, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi - On Dec 22, 2020, at 7:37 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 12:37 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Security vulnerabilities in AOO? To

Re: Call for Proposals: Apache OpenOffice Devroom at FOSDEM 2021 (online)

Hello all, We are still looking for participants. There are a view days left to reserve a slot for your talk. It would be nice if we have some more talks. Talks are prerecorded, in case you wonder. All the Best Peter On 11.12.20 01:13, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi Andrea, Thanks for the info

Re: Apple Dumping Intel.

On 22.12.20 11:07, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Steve, Am 22.12.20 um 02:33 schrieb Steve Lubbs: Has there been any thought given to moving/creating an OSX port to Apple's up coming Apple Silicon RISC CPU? Of course there are thoughts about that. But given our little resources it will take some

Re: Security vulnerabilities in AOO?

On 22.12.20 11:11, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Peter, Am 22.12.20 um 10:49 schrieb Peter Kovacs: But this is my personal opinion and does not need to be shared with anyone else. And that's why you posted this on a public mailing list? ;-) I frased a bad sentence. I meant that you do not

Re: Apple Developer Program

On 22.12.20 02:28, Steve Lubbs wrote: On 12/20/20 12:50 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: On 20.12.20 01:37, Steve Lubbs wrote: Do we have any access to the Apple Developer Program? Sure would be handy. I think we have access. Can anyone provide the particulars of how to use the Apple Developer

Re: Security vulnerabilities in AOO?

On 22.12.20 10:39, Marcus wrote: Am 22.12.20 um 09:05 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: the following question is primarily for my information and not to start a discussion. Is there a place where security vulnerabilities in AOO are centrally documented?(*) yes Please note that we don't discuss any

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? (was: Old build Documentation)

On 21.12.20 15:11, Jörg Schmidt wrote: I suggest we create a archive site (suggestion: archive.openoffice.org) site, and move pages there, that have only historic value. Can you also tell which ones they are? On what factual basis? I, personally, had noted e.g. in the confluence-Wiki pages w

Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? (was: Old build Documentation)

On 20.12.20 18:58, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Greetings Peter, comments are inline. On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 00:32:15 +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote: I change subject since I venture to more generic topic. On 19.12.20 22:15, Keith N. McKenna wrote: The Policy for the mwiki is and has been since the

Re: Where I think I'll be of the most use.

On 20.12.20 01:16, Steve Lubbs wrote: After spending a few hours poking around I have some ideas on where I can make the biggest impact given my background. Multi-threading/Concurrency: This is one of my bailiwicks. Correct me if I'm wrong but it appears that concurrency support was removed

Re: Apple Developer Program

On 20.12.20 01:37, Steve Lubbs wrote: Do we have any access to the Apple Developer Program? Sure would be handy. I think we have access. -- This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html - To unsubscribe, e-

Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages? (was: Old build Documentation)

I change subject since I venture to more generic topic. On 19.12.20 22:15, Keith N. McKenna wrote: The Policy for the mwiki is and has been since the days of OpenOffice.org (OOo) to NOT delete pages from the wiki but mark them as outdated and be sure there is a link to any replacement documen

Re: Old build Documentation

On 19.12.20 14:38, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi Peter, On 12/19/20 8:13 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Hello Peter, On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 01:30:21AM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, do we still need the documentation description for: https://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source

Re: Design Docs?

contributions are welcome, what works for you. On 19.12.20 09:50, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi all. I add to the list. At [3] you can read on the Framework, and get an basic Idea how it is linked. At [4] I started to extend the list you see in [2] and try to have a short description what you find. At[5

Re: Design Docs?

Hi all. I add to the list. At [3] you can read on the Framework, and get an basic Idea how it is linked. At [4] I started to extend the list you see in [2] and try to have a short description what you find. At[5] you find a draw Document I created that tries to give you some hint which mo

Old build Documentation

Hello all, do we still need the documentation description for: https://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/build_windows_pre638.html http://www.openoffice.org/tools/dev_docs/build_windows.html https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide I mean, the first link is the first re

Re: Help with GIT. PR #74 Removed whitespace from files Helpcontent2

On 18.12.20 14:16, Dick Groskamp wrote: I should have mentioned that there was 1 conflict, which I resolved. Should I now again do git commit or not ? In my Opinion you should recommit -- This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html -

Re: new person

On 17.12.20 22:26, Dave Fisher wrote: On Dec 17, 2020, at 1:16 PM, Bartosz Bartczak wrote: Hello developers, I'm using OO and AOO very long time in IT Businesses. I think I can "pay my debt" for what you have been doing for me through the AOO program. All participation is appreciated. I

Re: [proposal} Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort

Hi all, I took the liberty to execute the invite to slack. All the best Peter On 17.12.20 07:36, marcia wilbur wrote: Hi Keith, please send slack invite. Additionally - dev team - I am working on Pi port still - just updated to dec release of Pi OS. -marcia - Original Message -

Re: [PROPOSAL] restructuring build documentation

sure, try what you have in mind. We wont loose anything by trying. On 17.12.20 14:05, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Dear All, I am cross-posting to dev@ and doc@ because... I am not sure which one fits best. Please excuse me if this is wrong, and only reply on the correct list. I personally find b

Re: Reporting broken download link

The release notes in German, maybe also helpfull: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=165224926 @Volker Höhfeld: Wir vermuten das der Gatekeeper Probleme macht. Für support in deutsch: user...@openoffice.apache.org Es gibt auch eine deutsche dev liste dev...@open

Re: issue with dmake clean

On 15.12.20 20:14, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Dec 15, 2020, at 12:57 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Carl, Am 13.12.20 um 23:43 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi Matthias, On 12/13/20 4:29 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Carl, Am 13.12.20 um 19:02 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi all, Just ran into something

Re: Broken_Link: "https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Basic/Accessing_Libraries_from_Basic"-rm201208-

Matthias Seidel >wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> I am not sure what you are talking about here... >>> >>> The discussion is about a non working extension for our Wiki server. >>> >>> The repository is for our Media Wiki extension? >&

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

On 11.12.20 12:47, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Dec 11, 2020, at 5:27 AM, Bidouille wrote: Which is why we need to get 4.2.0 out asap :/ Any news? TDF blog publish on this bug: https://tinyurl.com/y6zjvp2j Bad advice :-( I love that group. They are like immature kids. Or bitter ex-boy/girl-frie

Re: Fwd: Broken_Link: "https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Basic/Accessing_Libraries_from_Basic"-rm201208-

e: Am 09.12.20 um 18:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs: How about we create a OpenOffice-Mwiki-ext Repo in gitbox? We could do the same for the forums customizations. So we have more control over our support code. +1 This increases the chance that also others can have a look and give some hints when problems

Re: Call for Proposals: Apache OpenOffice Devroom at FOSDEM 2021 (online)

Hi all, I have also entered a lecture. I would like to try if we can use the event to proceed to use as a public think tank. The talk will be prerecorded, and so I can focus on the discussion with interested folks. Title: The future of Base Here is my abstract: In this talk I will be talk

Re: Java, OOo, ... (Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

Thank you Rony for the Java deep dive. On 08.12.20 19:11, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: Hmm, just some thoughts and pointers that may be helpful in the context of the current Java and possibly HSQL discussions. Ad Java and OpenOffice IMHO Java has been fulfilling Sun's original promi

Re: Fwd: Broken_Link: "https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Basic/Accessing_Libraries_from_Basic"-rm201208-

How about we create a OpenOffice-Mwiki-ext Repo in gitbox? We could do the same for the forums customizations. So we have more control over our support code. All the Best Peter On 09.12.20 18:24, Dick Groskamp wrote: On 2020/12/09 11:34:03, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi Dick, I have copied it o

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

On 08.12.20 03:06, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:38 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi all, I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

On 08.12.20 09:27, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2020 3:49 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO My first question has to be : Why are we still u

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

On 08.12.20 09:14, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, December 07, 2020 11:03 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO Maybe one more thing: Is the problem database even

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote: Hello Jim Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is currently HEAD of master. I built it with the system version of Debian 10 bsh 2.0b4-19. and this part works. This is odd.

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

On 07.12.20 23:34, Dave Fisher wrote: Sent from my iPhone On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:  On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote: Hello Jim Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is currently

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

On 07.12.20 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Dec 7, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: On 07.12.20 20:48, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi all, I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base Database. Our current

Re: Beanshell (Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109))

On 07.12.20 21:56, Mechtilde wrote: Hello Jim Am 07.12.20 um 20:35 schrieb Jim Jagielski: There appears to be quite a large change in beanshell from 2.0b6 and what is currently HEAD of master. I built it with the system version of Debian 10 bsh 2.0b4-19. and this part works. Ok. Now the b

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

On 07.12.20 22:35, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] Sent: Monday, December 07, 2020 10:11 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO I agree that eating our own dogfood and using Derby would be the "better" path to

Re: [discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

On 07.12.20 20:48, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Dec 7, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi all, I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same

[discussion] future embedded DB in AOO

Hi all, I would like to know how you guys feel we should move on with our base Database. Our current strategy is a small sized embedded DB using HSQLDB (BSD). There are 2 other options in the same weight class, that is H2 (EPL1 or MPL2) and Apache Derby (AL2). Something like SQLLite (PublicD

Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)

: Hello Peter, Am 07.12.20 um 07:57 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Hi Mechtilde, check main/saxton/saxton-9.0.0.7-bj.patch line 147 and 148 +    +    thanks, yes this works I changed it from 1.4 to 1.6. Now It stop at the next step building Beanshell In /home/mechtilde/openoffice/main/beanshell

Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin

On 07.12.20 08:24, Peter Kovacs wrote: On 07.12.20 08:04, Don Lewis wrote: On  7 Dec, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with. configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use --disable-gtk or install the

Re: How to cope with Python module putting .so files into lib64 instead of lib?

I think we can only try to build and install on many distributions. If it is only a folder change I think it should be save. At least Arch /usr/lib is only a softlink to /usr/lib64 On 07.12.20 08:30, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Dear List, I think I am close to a possible solution to this probl

Re: Configure missing gtk-plugin

On 07.12.20 08:04, Don Lewis wrote: On 7 Dec, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with. configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use --disable-gtk or install the missing packages What does this mean? I did not

Re: Source and target of Java version (Was: Review of PR 109)

Hi Mechtilde, check main/saxton/saxton-9.0.0.7-bj.patch line 147 and 148 +    +    all the best Peter On 07.12.20 07:48, Mechtilde wrote: Hello, Con someone give me a hint where and how can I change the source option and the target option for the Java version. Kind regards Mechtilde Am

Configure missing gtk-plugin

Hello all, I haave an issue with configuring I am unfammiliar with. configure: error: requirements to build the gtk-plugin not met. Use --disable-gtk or install the missing packages What does this mean? I did not find this in any package. I installed gtk2 and gst-plugin-gtk (which are th

Re: macOS - oldest supported version

Hi all, +1 for the version change. I prepared some numbers, whgich will give you some ffeling on our user base. In November we had following Mac Users visiting our pages (total of 187.059 users): 01.    Macintosh    Intel 10.15    57,41 % 02.    Macintosh    Intel 10.13    14,01 % 03.    M

Re: Help w/ bt

good Job :) On 03.12.20 18:08, Jim Jagielski wrote: fixed: it was a strcpy overflow. On Dec 2, 2020, at 9:02 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: That's in main/soltools. Try isolate the exact command used, and try run that problematic makedeepend binary in a debugger with the same args. 4 = SIGILL,

Re: [openoffice] branch trunk updated: Huge updates to macOS UNO bridges, based on FreeBSD and Linux.

How about we change the Linux and FreeBSD Code to the C++ static cast? I think we should move away from C Code and only use it where we must use it. On 02.12.20 04:30, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Dec 1, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 1 Dec, j...@apache.org wrote: This is an automate

Re: Question re Chromebook

Latest version works. Here is the guide how to do this: https://youtu.be/MJUUUp3ufN8 Am 1. Dezember 2020 19:52:08 MEZ schrieb Mel Earley <4308w...@gmail.com>: >What versions of OpenOffice will work on a Chromebook OS >Mel >Halifax >Canada

RE: English flyer

We have a slack channel... Am 1. Dezember 2020 12:03:20 MEZ schrieb Emilie Drd : >Ok thanks, I’ll set up a Slack then and share it with you guys (and the >flyer) 😊 > >Emilie >From: Pedro Lino >Sent: mardi 1 décembre 2020 11:57 >To: dev@openoffice.apache.org

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

On 21.11.20 15:50, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Hello, I wanted to build trunk and I found out that the requirement for the new EPM is already in place. So: 1- thank you for taking care of this! 2- could you please tell us what is the correct value for the "--with-epm-url" parameter to the

Re: Problem with Boost headers under openSUSE Leap 15.2

Hi Arrigo On 19.11.20 18:40, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: Dear List, I am trying to build AOO418 on my up-to-date openSUSE Leap 15.2 x86_64. Compilation fails on module xml2cmp, file ain/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/inc/boost/tr1/detail/config_all.hpp with the message "no such file or directory" when lo

Re: Delete the mailing list general-es

On 18.11.20 22:36, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 17/11/2020 Marcos Delgado wrote: Hello, I am in charge of the list and I want to remove it. 99% of emails are spam. And I see no case to continue maintaining it. Who are the other moderators of that list? Would you be fine with converting it to a

Re: New EPM Maintainer... me!

On 20.11.20 16:54, Jim Jagielski wrote: With this in mind, I will be adjusting AOO trunk and AOO42X to require this newer version. Once I release EPM v5.0.0, I will make those changes. I am also using your work already. :) On Nov 19, 2020, at 7:06 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 19.11.20 um 17:49 sc

Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur?

sry, for the late reply. On 21.11.20 08:33, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 11:41 PM To:dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Does AOO 4.1.8 run under macOS Big Sur? Hi Marcus, Am 20.11.20

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.8 released

Jim , can you have a quick look at Issue 128413 [1] The user and group affiliations seem to be wrong. I am not sure what the best elegant way to fix this is. [1] https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128413 Am 12.11.20 um 19:30 schrieb Jim Jagielski: ++1! Onwards to 4.2.0 ;) On Nov 11,

4.1.8 not selectable on Bugzilla

Hello can someone add the version to Bugzilla, please? thank you! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [CMS Migration] Ready for Acceptance Testing

Awesome Job, Dave! I really appreciate the hard work you have put into this topic. So next steps would be to get the 1) Check for Issues 2) update page towards 4.1.8 3) switch to the new system in roder to finish the Migration? As a next step I see an inventory of the pages and get an over

Re: upgrade notifications once we release 4.2.0

ov 10, 2020, at 8:27 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: I am against keeping 4.1.x alive once 4.2.0 is production ready. And this strategy we have communicated. Am 10.11.20 um 04:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski: The only reason why we've decided to move to CentOS7 for our community builds is because we bui

Re: upgrade notifications once we release 4.2.0

I am against keeping 4.1.x alive once 4.2.0 is production ready. And this strategy we have communicated. Am 10.11.20 um 04:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski: The only reason why we've decided to move to CentOS7 for our community builds is because we build them w/ gstreamer, and only CentOS7 has gstreame

Re: pi 4 port update

Hi Marcia, I am curious. what kind of dependency error do you have? All the best Peter Am 08.11.20 um 08:53 schrieb marcia wilbur: Hi - so many dependency errors on pi4 buster. Did i see a post where someone got debian 4.1.8 working? Maybe I should try this...? - Original Message -

Re: Bugzilla Account

Hi Eric, Nice to see you switched from the recruiting list to the dev list. Welcome. We have switched of selfservice of Bugzilla account creation, due to the increasing support requests and spam attempts. For create an account we need your preferrd user handle. Thanks. What do you want to

Online accessible Mac Machine for AOO dev

Hello all, I want to inform you we have today received access of a Mac with Catalina sponsored by MacStadium. The i5 with 8GB and a 250SSD can be used for development, building and Testing of Apache OpenOffice. In the next days I will create a build bot on the machine that will start to b

Re: QA Automated Test coverage

How about creating an automated manual test RPA robot as a GSoC? Just a wild idea. Am 28. Oktober 2020 22:42:11 MEZ schrieb Andrea Pescetti : >Peter Kovacs wrote: >> Maybe the following link helps? >> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html > >Indeed

Re: Google Analytics and Download Count

Am 28.10.20 um 00:32 schrieb Dave Fisher: What git migration? Exactly. I did only switch, without taking everyone along. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:51 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:  Am 27.10.20 um 23:22 schrieb Dave Fisher: Hi - Sent from my iPhone On Oct 27, 2020, at 3

Re: Google Analytics and Download Count

Am 27.10.20 um 23:22 schrieb Dave Fisher: Hi - Sent from my iPhone On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:07 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Dave Fisher wrote: I will be doing the initial migration as quickly as I can. I think that metrics needs a specific discussion. Initially I’ll comment this out. Do I u

Re: QA Automated Test coverage

Maybe the following link helps? https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/index.html Kay did migrate stuff in 2018 I think. Maybe went a bit unnoticed? Is this what the Server had contained? Am 27.10.20 um 22:58 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote: Slightly off topic is the

Re: Wiki Publisher

I hope I have some time soon to start migrating some LO Patches around the wiki Publisher, we are very likely to be able to use. Am 26.10.20 um 15:52 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Joost, Am 26.10.20 um 13:19 schrieb Joost Andrae: Hi Matthias, I've just tried it out against a different MediaWi

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >