On 09/01/24 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
I don't seem to have permission to create new pages in the Wiki (
wiki.openoffice.org).
Can someone please give me access?
I've given additional permissions to user "Damjan"; you should now be
able to create pages.
Regards,
Andrea.
On 27/08/23 Matthias Seidel wrote:
https://home.apache.org/~pescetti/AppImage/
I followed your instructions. When I try to start it I get
./ApacheOpenOffice-x86_64.AppImage
/tmp/.mount_Apache9fEaNk/AppRun: 3: cd: can't cd to usr/program
/tmp/.mount_Apache9fEaNk/AppRun: 4: ./soffice: not found
After promising it quite some time ago, I managed to have the time to
make an experimental AppImage available at last. It took a while...
thank you for your patience!
You can find it at
https://home.apache.org/~pescetti/AppImage/
and any Linux user can download it and play with it.
This is
On 07/05/23 Dave Fisher wrote:
For those just now looking into this here is a link: https://docs.appimage.org/
If we switch to this packaging it appears that we can significantly reduce the
many Linux packages we create when we release.
I've done a recent build to produce an AppImage a few
On 28/11/22 Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 28.11.22 um 20:04 schrieb Carl Marcum:
I would also be for disabling inactive accounts and letting people
request it to sysadmin@ or something like that if that would help.
That would also be my proposal. But I have no idea what is possible.
Andrea might
On 07/01/23 Dave wrote:
The marketing mailing list has a deteriorating level of usefulness. ...
I propose that, unless any member of the project can offer any clear and
fully justifiable reason for doing otherwise, we shut down the "spam
bait" marketing list.
Yes, +1 for shutting it down; I
On 08/01/23 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
OpenOffice is Open-Source Software, not Free Software. There is a
difference.
Indeed there is a difference, but OpenOffice is both Open Source
software and Free Software for all reasonable definitions of each category.
So we are allowed into events of
casa...@email.it wrote:
For months I have been asking for help to fix a registration problem on the
Italian AOO forum. You both promised me you'd step in, but so far you haven't.
We are all volunteers and we do what we can.
The fact that you didn't see anything doesn't mean that we did
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
I have access to edit our wiki, but while trying to update our main main
wiki page at https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Main_Page I saw it's been
locked against changes.
Can I please get access?
Sure, but I'll need your username (in private is fine too).
For starters,
You've often seen me spamming this list in the last week of the year in
recent years calling for FOSDEM submissions, but I am not doing it this
time... since there will be no OpenOffice devroom at FOSDEM 2023.
With the return to physical events, rooms are limited and FOSDEM tries
to rotate
Bidouille wrote:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges=500
Somebody can ban Albryan @ comcast.net and remove his posts?
User blocked. As for posts, I'll delete them later today or tomorrow,
just the time to check recent and old activity in detail.
Regards,
I can't help noticing that Apache OpenOffice turns 10 as a top level
project at the ASF today...
Happy birthday everybody, and keep up the good work!
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
On 15/10/22 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
We currently use 2 XML libraries in our C/C++ code, expat and libxml2.
This is unnecessary, one of them can be removed, and I propose we
remove expat.
+1 from me; as you explain, keeping expat would need additional effort
too due to the compiler issues, so
Marcus wrote:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/300-million-downloads-of-apache
- Insert the graphic via the normal way via "Insert Media File"
- With the respective button change into the "Code View"
- Search for the media URL
- Delete the "?t=true" appendix
(I think it tells Roller to
On 29/08/22 Peter Kovacs wrote:
We have 3 servers. Maybe we can deploy the service there?
Technically this would be possible, sure.
But I think these sites were moved to external hosting since the ASF had
concerns, at the time, with the many different licenses used by the
Extensions and
On 27/08/22 Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 23.08.22 um 23:53 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I found a note that we package the build log (which is 20 Megabytes.)
It is at least since 4.1.10 Part of the source release and in 4.1.13
it is the build log for MacOSx.
That is most likely because Jim is doing
On 21/08/22 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
- Opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/issues/INFRA-23610 to ask
INFRA how we can use an ASF-owned resource instead of my server
INFRA answered they won't help since they only cater for websites they
maintain, while this one is externally
On 20/08/22 Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
1) We get confirmation that this is fixed not only for me
2) Then I can apply the same fix to Templates and have a fix in place,
where the only drawback is that it uses my server
3) Then I would create a new issue like the abandoned
On 18/08/22 Dave wrote:
But I would suggest a simpler approach now: we can try and configure
an account to be used for sending mail (even a GMail account will do)
and update the site configuration to use GMail as SMTP. And then, if
it works, we replace it with a more reasonable sender, like an
Dave wrote:
We are getting more and more complainants about Template and Extension
authors being unable to access these sites.
I'm catching up with mail and indeed I see this is a recurrent issue.
To check the issue I tried register at the Templates site and received a
totally garbage
On 10/03/22 Pedro Lino wrote:
Thanks to Andrea's clear instructions we now have one more trained "staff" to
do this update ;)
Thank you for taking over! I'll try to get the instructions posted to
some "official" shared space by this weekend.
Regards,
Andrea.
On 27/02/22 Mechtilde wrote:
> Am 27.02.22 um 19:29 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> Is there information needed in the code itself to support
>> a language, and if where in the code would I I look see if
>> it is already there?
Which language you are looking for?
We have to extract it from the
On 19/02/22 Pedro Lino wrote:
no one opposes that I have permissions on the Extensions shell access?
Done! You have it now.
Who can handle this so you can teach me further steps?
I've written extensive documentation with the aim of adding it to
On 11/02/22 Pedro Lino wrote:
Do you have time for this issue during this weekend?
Hello Pedro,
I had to try a lot of times since apparently the process changed since
the last time I checked this, but I was able to login at last and it's
still weekend!
So, the first steps on your side,
Reminder: FOSDEM is coming this weekend and you don't even need to
travel to Brussels this year, as everything will happen online.
On Saturday we'll have a morning session and an afternoon session
(European time) and you can find schedule details here:
Pedro Lino wrote:
I found some odd results. If the user has an older than 2017 version of the dictionary,
the Extension Update dialog will report that version 2017.05.01 is available. If the user
has the 2017.05.01 version or newer it will always report that "No new updates are
available."
Matthias Seidel wrote:
it looks like the author is willing to release it also for OpenOffice.
Can we help him?
General information:
https://archive.fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/ode_localization/
Adding a new language or locale:
for information.
Regards,
Andrea.
On 08/12/2021 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
## Call for Proposals
We are happy to announce that we will be running an Apache OpenOffice
Devroom again at FOSDEM 2022.
The event will be held online on Saturday, 5 Feb 2022. Participation is
free. No registration
## Call for Proposals
We are happy to announce that we will be running an Apache OpenOffice
Devroom again at FOSDEM 2022.
The event will be held online on Saturday, 5 Feb 2022. Participation is
free. No registration required.
We are now open to receiving proposals for content for a day of
On 25/10/2021 MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
Mail: jpmeng...@debian.org
Nick: texou
For adding scenari for QA test from a UI point of view
I see this account request was still pending, so I've gone ahead and
created it.
You can set a password using
On 17/10/2021 Matthias Seidel wrote:
On this day, 9 years ago Apache OpenOffice became an Apache Top Level
Project (TLP).
Thanks for the reminder... and a big thank you to those who still ensure
the continued success of OpenOffice!
Regards,
Andrea.
On 30/09/2021 Jim Jagielski wrote:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.11-RC1/
Please cast your vote:
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
[X] yes / +1
[ ] no / -1
My vote is based on
[X] binding (member of PMC)
[X] I have built and tested the RC from
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
It is fixed by editing line 541 of
main/solenv/bin/download_external_dependencies.pl
so that it reads (add the middle line):
$agent->env_proxy;
$agent->ssl_opts(verify_hostname => 0);
my $response = $agent->get($URL);
Additional note:
On 02/10/2021 Pedro Lino wrote:
I can confirm that bootstrapping works as expected on my Ubuntu 18.04.6 OS
I've bumped into the same problem while building on an old CentOS 7 VM
(but doing a clean build).
It is fixed by editing line 541 of
main/solenv/bin/download_external_dependencies.pl
Persy Morell Guerra wrote:
I was trying to download form :
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.10/binaries/es/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.10_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_es.tar.gz/download
Please check whether one of the following alternative mirrors works for
you and let
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Pedro Lino wrote:
On 05/29/2021 9:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
https://remixicon.com/
This one is really interesting! Can you share the links to other
projects that you have found?
FontAwesome https://fontawesome.com/license/free is really popular and
CC
Pedro Lino wrote:
On 05/29/2021 9:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
https://remixicon.com/
This one is really interesting! Can you share the links to other projects that
you have found?
FontAwesome https://fontawesome.com/license/free is really popular and
CC-BY (but recent versions include
Pedro Lino wrote:
On 05/28/2021 10:27 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
In short, a possible explanation should be: we were carrying GPL icons
and deleted them due to license incompatibility, but in the meantime,
and independently, those icons had been relicensed to avoid excessive
restrictions; so
On 28/05/2021 Dave Fisher wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119096
If the concern is a GPL build tool that we do not distribute (that is allowed)
and what we distribute is PD w/ a Notice request then I don’t see any issue.
The concern, by reading comment 3 in the issue,
Peter Kovacs wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127513
Should this Issue not be adjusted?
Yes, a few years passed in the meantime and indeed now CentOS 7 would be
a better choice than CentOS 6, with maintenance guaranteed until June 2024.
https://wiki.centos.org/About/Product
Tomorrow (Saturday) we are at FOSDEM all day, European time.
Full schedule and links (top right):
https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/track/apache_openoffice/
Talks are pre-recorded but we have live Questions and Answers in Matrix;
also, Dave had issues with recording his videos, so the web
Marcus wrote:
Am 26.01.21 um 22:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Maybe you can find something in the Bugzilla configuration that
defines the default QA contact? ...
Sorry, not in BZ itself. I've looked into the admin settings but cannot
find a suitable option.
I believe our old (and I don't know
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I am calling a VOTE on releasing the complimentary community builds of
macOS Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9-RC1 as GA.
I won't be able to test on a Mac but, in case I ask others to check,
they should make sure the following bug is fixed, right?
Marcus wrote:
IMHO we just ned to make sure that isues@ is either the assignee - this
works as long as nobody is taking over the issue for working on it - or
it's in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to
issues@.
Even though I can't really find it in older issues like
On 19/01/2021 Peter Kovacs wrote:
On 18.01.21 21:24, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
I am subscribed with my own e-mail address and I would like to assign
bug 128424 to myself.
Is it possible to keep iss...@openoffice.apache.org in the loop? ...
If you just assig the issue to you I think we will not
On 21/01/2021 Pedro Lino wrote:
Please let me know if it works; if it does, I will then revert it and
republish only after 4.1.9 is out ...
It is fixed indeed (although I get 2 notifications for that extension, but one
problem at a time!). Thanks!
OK, thank you for checking. I've now
On 18/01/21 Jim Jagielski wrote:
I am calling a VOTE on releasing the source and complimentary community builds
of
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9-RC1 as GA.
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
[X] yes / +1
[ ] no / -1
My vote is based on
[X] binding (member of PMC)
[X] I have
On 20/01/2021 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I think we can fix it. Let me give it a try tomorrow.
I believe it's fixed now (limited to the specific case of the English
dictionary; I had to find some workarounds so I enabled only that
extension for testing).
Please let me know if it works
On 18/01/2021 Steve Lubbs wrote:
So it seems that OS2 is not supported by the AOO project.
Correct.
I assume that the AOO project is not updating the OS2 code.
Wrong (well, kind of...). Yuri Dario is an Apache committer too; and we
did incorporate the last changes he did into our source
On 20/01/2021 Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 20.01.21 um 00:47 schrieb Pedro Lino:
On 01/19/2021 5:38 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
In this case it looks for the feed on the SourceForge server. My guess is,
that these feeds are not generated anymore.
I don't know if this was an automatic
On 13/01/2021 Carl Marcum wrote:
On 1/10/21 4:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
and, still on the wiki, there is also a more complete dump of the
former Testlink cases that I cannot find right now.
Maybe these?
https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/
Indeed, thanks! To be precise, the first link
On 10/01/2021 Peter Kovacs wrote:
On 10.01.21 23:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
But we should also be more proactive and remove people when they ask
for it on the list: Whimsy https://whimsy.apache.org/ ...
The moderators are Patricia, Andrea and Marcus.
I confirm that indeed I use Whimsy
On 09/01/2021 Carl Marcum wrote:
It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML.
I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with
dev@ and some others.
+1 and Infra can indeed add it.
But we should also be more proactive and remove people when they
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html#GPL
I was a bit confused myself when I first read it, but why post it on an
ASF FAQ site if it doesn't grant reciprocity?
Because, if I recall correctly, back at the time the two Foundations
worked together in order
On 05/01/2021 Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
I tried to ask if there is a procedure to follow for testing [1].
Do we have any? I can follow it for the Italian builds.
Things are very different depending on whether one is testing a dev
build or a release candidate.
A list of manual tests close to
On 22/12/2020 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
my personal opinion is very simple:
for me it would be enough to archive a static copy of the current state of the
web pages, a history is not needed (in my opinion).
This is what we get by using SVN/GIT (for static content, like the main
OpenOffice.org
On 17/12/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
I think I've fixed the blank pages problem in the Developer Guide.
...and I think I've read all the MWiki-related mails sent to this list
by now, so I'll answer!
Thank you guys for fixing the long-standing bug.
I documented, back at the time, the MWiki
Last call: don't be shy! Let's take FOSDEM as an occasion for an overall
"state of the project" where we inform each other on the current status
and ways forward.
All talks will be pre-recorded as Peter wrote, so no problem with
timezones; but after each talk we will have a live "questions
## Call for Proposals
We are happy to announce that we will be running an Apache OpenOffice
Devroom again at FOSDEM 2021.
The event will be held online on Saturday, February 6th, 2021.
Participation is free. No registration required.
We are now open to receiving proposals for content for a
Good news: FOSDEM organizers decided to allocate an entire day for
Apache OpenOffice next year.
https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/tracks/
It is now tentatively scheduled for February 6th, online, free
attendance; talks will have to be pre-recorded.
I see this as an opportunity for a
On 20/11/2020 Marcus wrote:
the last mail seems to be from June 2020 [1]. Do you really think that
deleting the mailing list is a disservice? ;-)
For me it's obvious that there is no longer a purpose.
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?general...@openoffice.apache.org:2020-6
This is not
On 17/11/2020 Marcos Delgado wrote:
Hello, I am in charge of the list and I want to remove it. 99% of
emails are spam. And I see no case to continue maintaining it.
Who are the other moderators of that list?
Would you be fine with converting it to a "subscription required" list,
i.e., any
Dave Fisher wrote:
www.openoffice.org is switched over!
Thank you! I've taken a look at the Italian site and:
- Redirect from http://it.openoffice.org is still handled correctly
- Some CSS is broken in the Italian site menu (most notably for already
clicked links); here it would be useful
Dave Fisher wrote:
If you start here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.8
All you need to do is press Create child page
Actually, what I usually do is to copy the page; the Copy function asks
what page to use as parent and there one can specify the original page
as
On 15/11/2020 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
yes for openoffice-project, not yet for openoffice-org.
I'm changing this to a "yes" for both sites after the recent changes.
Both sites are now almost identical to their CMS counterpart. Well done!
One thing I'd appreciate, but this goes
John D'Orazio wrote:
It's online again, I guess it was a temporary glitch. I had refreshed
cache, in any case it's back now.
Actually the entire site is down (intermittently) for me too. Note that
I mean, exactly as in your mail, the project site
https://openoffice.apache.org not the product
Matthias Seidel wrote:
Yes for openoffice-project.
openoffice-org has some optical glitches that should be ironed out before.
Same for me (both). So: yes for openoffice-project, not yet for
openoffice-org.
The staged layout for openoffice-org has clear issues. Also,
openoffice-org is so
Marcus ha scritto:
Am 15.11.20 um 16:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 15.11.20 um 15:54 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Matthias Seidel wrote:
By the way: these were my first edits to the the project site after
the migration and everything was smooth, thanks a lot Dave! It really
looks good
Matthias Seidel wrote:
https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/blob/main/content/doap_openoffice.rdf
I'll regenerate it from the standard template, just in case something
changed there too.
Please update it in the new repository.
Pushed. The template had indeed been updated (references
Matthias Seidel wrote:
Implementing it in AOO takes time, so we should concentrate on making
the "error" message more logical.
Now:
This document was created by a newer version of OpenOffice. It may
contain features not supported by your current version.
Suggested:
This document uses an
Dave Fisher wrote:
The file in question is here:
https://github.com/apache/openoffice-project/blob/main/content/doap_openoffice.rdf
You can leave further updates to this file to me for this weekend. I'll
regenerate it from the standard template, just in case something changed
there too.
I
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
AppImage and Snap packages would be the best, as those are multi-distro,
portable apps, do desktop integration, user friendly, standard
uninstallation, etc.
I'm singling this out as this is a different discussion, related to how
we package rather than how we build. I
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Cast your vote:
[X] CentOS7
[ ] Ubuntu 14.04
[ ] Something else:
CentOS 7 builds will run under Ubuntu 13.x too. While CentOS 7 32-bit
would be unsupported, the 64-bit version would receive maintenance until
2024; Ubuntu 14.04, instead, is already
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I am 100% still supportive of my original decision to baseline CentOS7 for the
4.2.x community builds. I see no reason to change that.
I fully agree. Building on CentOS 5 is extremely hard these times, and
one would have to replace the system SSL libraries just to
On 05/11/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 05.11.20 um 22:55 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
This is a restriction/limitation of 'svn'... you cannot move one dir to another
between repos:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/308115/copy-folder-of-svn-repository-to-a-folder-in-another-repository
A request to improve readability of pre-release commit messages: would
it be possible to svn mv a directory (or a set of directories) instead
of the single files?
Looking at
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?comm...@openoffice.apache.org
there are 33 pages of mails for Linux/Mac that make it
On 02/11/20 Jim Jagielski wrote:
Please cast your vote:
The Release Candidate is good for production/GA:
[X] yes / +1
[ ] no / -1
My vote is based on
[ ] binding (member of PMC)
[X] I have built and tested the RC from source on platform [Linux 64]
[ ] I have tested the
Pedro Lino wrote:
Then it makes sense to at least change the tutorial at oo.org or even switch to
the apt command below?
I always install with apt when I test on Ubuntu:
$ sudo apt install ./*.deb ./desktop-integration/*.deb
but I think apt is the recommended tool "only" since Ubuntu 16.04,
Pedro Lino wrote:
On 10/30/2020 10:29 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
$ sudo dpkg -i *.deb desktop-integration/*deb
I don't see why that would have different results.
Because the conflict you were seeing was due to a file being moved from
a .deb to another one; with the 3 steps dpkg cannot
Pedro Lino wrote:
Just recompiled AOO 4.1.8 on another Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 without issues.
Installing 4.1.8 over 4.1.7 end with error reported 2 years ago
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127774
It might be hard to try again in the same conditions, but isn't this
fixed by running the
to restart manual tests.
Just for clarity, the subject refers to "automated" tests but I was
replying to the items concerning manual tests. On the other hand,
automated tests are definitely important; I'm just not familiar at all
with automated tests in OpenOffice.
Regards,
Andre
Don Lewis wrote:
On 28 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In particular, this is when building from the "official" SRC_RELEASE
tarball we provide. Is the inc/reporevision.lst file not included?
It is in one of the RCs that I looked at.
I don't have full information, but as I was the one who reported
Dave Fisher wrote:
I will be doing the initial migration as quickly as I can. I think that metrics
needs a specific discussion.
Initially I’ll comment this out.
Do I understand well that there is no technical reason whatsoever to get
rid of Google Analytics, and that the discussion is purely
On 24/10/2020 Carl Marcum wrote:
Slightly off topic is the QA Intro page [1] discusses TestLink which I don't
think we use anymore
Well, it looks like Adfinis decided to kill it. That was set up in the
recent era (Apache), so it should serve as a lesson: Adfinis contributed
a server, got
On 20/10/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote:
It seems that I am the only one interested in the data Google Analytics
provides.
I'm interested in keeping Google Analytics too.
We have years of historic data there and they are useful right now,
since we'll want to ensure that the top 30 pages are
Don Lewis wrote:
On 21 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
so are YOU able to build HEAD of AOO418 on CentOS5 ??
I haven't tried to build today's HEAD, but I've built and tested all of
my AOO418 commits on CentOS 5 before I made the commits.
It looks like we are getting closer I mean, we have a
On 13/10/20 Carl Marcum wrote:
Error: ERROR: More than one new package in directory
Using the
--with-epm-url=http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz
rather than the installed newer version worked for me.
Thank you Jim and Carl, I've added a note to the wiki
On 17/10/2020 19:13, Matthias Seidel wrote:
We are still open! ;-)
Wow! I managed to be there for a short time this morning and it was nice
to meet virtually.
As I said, it's good to be equipped for these solutions as conferences
(including our traditional yearly gathering at FOSDEM in
On 12/10/2020 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Happy birthday OpenOffice,
October 13th is the 20th anniversary of the founding of OpenOffice
I haven't seen on this list the link to the official 20th anniversary
announcement, so here it is:
https://s.apache.org/86lex
Happy birthday, now just in the
Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 14.10.20 um 21:19 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
I'm just looking to see where the fix/patch is :-)
The problem is... There was none. It just vanished at one point. ;-)
If the bug is in code, I don't understand why my builds at
On 13/10/2020 Peter Kovacs wrote:
The switch SYSTEM_STDLIBS will decide if the systemlib used is packaged
into the delivery or not.
For me this option is most likely to cause Issues.
I've rebuilt with options closer to the one Jim posted and I still don't
see the problem with my builds.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can you provide a copy of the config.log file?
Sure, uploaded at
http://people.apache.org/~pescetti/openoffice-4.1.8-rc2/
Just a remark about those builds: those are not release builds, I just
build with flags that are good for me in general. All details in the log
I get the same on a (64-bit of course) Ubuntu 20.04 system that, for the
record, had OpenOffice 4.1.7 installed.
If I install Jim's RC2 binary from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/binaries/it/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.8_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_it.tar.gz
and then
I've built the 4.1.8-RC2 sources from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.8-RC2/source/
on a new CentOS 7 VM and generated "installed" (not packaged), RPM and
DEB builds that I tested on a variety of Fedora and Ubuntu systems.
All good, for the most part. I'm still catching
On 12/04/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content/doap_openoffice.rdf
I would like to have it updated, esp. for the repository change from
Subversion to Git.
There is a tool for creating such a file:
https://projects.apache.org/create.html
The
On 12/04/2020 Peter Kovacs wrote:
I feel attacked by your negativeness and I feel I have to defend myself for my
action.
The main topic in this discussion is about "renaming something that is
not quite right but that has been the same for many years".
This is always a complex discussion,
Peter Kovacs wrote:
I found this on users mailing list. What do we do?
Nothing. Obviously this is a clueless guy who is desperately trying to
get our sites configured so that the Bing bots can index them faster...
But our sites are very static and this would slow them down for real
users,
Congratulations Patricia!
And a big thank you to Dave, who served in the outgoing Board.
Regards,
Andrea.
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
On 4/5/2020 1:15 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Thanks. I had hoped to get more active in AOO, but will be giving
priority to board activities for my Apache time.
On 04/04/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote:
http://www.openoffice.org/projects/extension/
That sounds good! Can you set up a simple page?
Done yesterday, then I didn't publish as publish.pl is no longer working
for me, but someone did the right thing. I've now committed a slightly
improved
Dave Fisher wrote:
I plan to investigate what happens if we map those sub domains.
I don't think we have an issue here. I mean, if someone writes
"extension" instead of the proper "extensions" this is just a typo,
right? By that metric, then we should also redirect "ww" to "www", typos
like
1 - 100 of 2585 matches
Mail list logo
