Hmm I was not answering you. Should have picked Damian mal.
The suggestion to use .net is to translate to c#. Or I misread. Sorry.
Am 4. Oktober 2017 20:50:06 MESZ schrieb Marcus :
>Am 04.10.2017 um 08:54 schrieb Peter kovacs:
>
>are you answering my mail or was this just a random reply?
>I'm won
Am 04.10.2017 um 08:54 schrieb Peter kovacs:
are you answering my mail or was this just a random reply?
I'm wondering as I don't see anything new in your mail.
How relevant is Win 32 bit in future?
0,0 %
Shouldn't we offer a Win 64bit in long run?
Of course.
Why move to C#? I do not see
How relevant is Win 32 bit in future?
Shouldn't we offer a Win 64bit in long run?
Why move to C#? I do not see the benefit.
I would rather opt for a clean modern C++ library design with hourglass APIs.
With that we can support all languages people want to use in an extention.
And we reduce comple
Also we could use the java c compiler to build machine code for win32 in
future. No license problem if the compiler is part of our build toolset.
Am 3. Oktober 2017 23:18:12 MESZ schrieb Marcus :
>Am 03.10.2017 um 22:26 schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Fernando Cassia
>wrot
Am 03.10.2017 um 22:26 schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On 10/3/17, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Now what:
1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences
(GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us
to?
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences
(GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us to?
To answer my own question, we can't ship OpenJDK - according to
http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional "Apache projec
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On 10/3/17, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> > Now what:
> > 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences
> > (GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us
> to?
> > 2. Drop Windows as a platfor
On 10/3/17, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Now what:
> 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences
> (GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us to?
> 2. Drop Windows as a platform, since it's the only affected platform (*nix
> users usually instal
Am 03.10.2017 um 15:59 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 03.10.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> It seems that Oracle pulled the 32-bit version of Java 9:
>>
>> https://twitter.com/mreinhold/status/912311207935090689
>
> thanks for your finding. I think we have a new topic on our todo list.
However, th
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Now what:
> 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences
> (GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us to?
>
To answer my own question, we can't ship OpenJDK - according to
http://apac
Am 03.10.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
It seems that Oracle pulled the 32-bit version of Java 9:
https://twitter.com/mreinhold/status/912311207935090689
thanks for your finding. I think we have a new topic on our todo list.
Marcus
---
Am 03.10.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Now what:
1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences
(GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us to?
of course this can be an option. But IMHO it's just a life extension.
Somewhen in the fu
Option 1, 3, 4 could work. (I would prefer 1 for short term and 3 for
long term)
Option 2 is nonsense.
Either way, I just wanted to inform the list about the fact...
Matthias
Am 03.10.2017 um 15:27 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> Go for which option?
> Or do you mean option 4 with the "Go" languag
Go for which option?
Or do you mean option 4 with the "Go" language?
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Go for it! ;-)
>
>
> Am 03.10.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> > Now what:
> > 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences
> > (GPL f
Go for it! ;-)
Am 03.10.2017 um 15:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> Now what:
> 1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences
> (GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us to?
> 2. Drop Windows as a platform, since it's the only affected platform
Now what:
1. Ship our own builds of OpenJDK, in matching bitness. Do the licences
(GPL for JVM, GPL-with-classpath-exception for class library) allow us to?
2. Drop Windows as a platform, since it's the only affected platform (*nix
users usually install distro OpenJDK packages so 32 bit OpenJDK wil
16 matches
Mail list logo