Passive?
On November 6, 2018 at 11:46:13, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
as I’m probably going to be implement the first PLC4X driver in a
non-invasive way, I was thinking about the naming.
Initially I talked about this mode as “Promiscuous Mode Driver” as it
Have you written up something in confluence and in the root of the source
dir that documents the branching strategy?
On November 14, 2018 at 07:59:11, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
I just thought I‘d post this as a reminder. I am currently in the process
of
Did you end up doing this?
On September 4, 2018 at 05:46:47, Julian Feinauer (
j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de) wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a short discussion with chris which I wanted to bring the
results back tot he list.
As the new Syntax for S7 addressing is getting more and more complex I want
expression.
No Antlr4 version yet.
So from a user's perspective we have done the change, however didn't
implement it the way described here (But doesn't mean that we won't change
that in the future)
Chris
Am 01.10.18, 16:17 schrieb "Otto Fowler" :
Did you end up doing this?
On Septemb
Sorry for the late reply, but I don’t see anyone else replying ( I’m trying
to catch up )
Can you sum up what you are trying to say?
On August 2, 2018 at 10:10:50, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
I just had a little technical discussion with Sebastian and I thought
You should confirm with your incubation mentors about what would be OK wrt
L It is super important.
On November 17, 2018 at 10:35:47, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
+1 (binding) (cdutz)
Checks performed:
- Checked out using the new tooling: OK
- Checked signatures: OK
-
Maybe Chris can post the Jira Issues he has opened in Daffodil?
On January 15, 2019 at 04:33:20, Julian Feinauer (
j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de) wrote:
Hi Chris,
thank you so much for your effort.
I think this ist he right way to go forward and get more languages
on-board.
Hopefully, we can
What branch are you failing right now?
On January 18, 2019 at 15:47:04, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi Justin,
Could you please build just the integrations(/apache-karaf modules with the
"-X" option to output stacktraces.
And could you please create a jira issue and
n January 18, 2019 at 16:13:35, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote:
What branch are you failing right now?
On January 18, 2019 at 15:47:04, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi Justin,
Could you please build just the integrations(/apache-karaf modules with the
&qu
After fetching and pulling into my develop branch I was able to `mvn clean
package` both with and without network with no errors. Nice job.
On January 19, 2019 at 13:17:11, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Ok ... so I guess I finally identified the problem Justin was having
Karaf: Simulated .. SUCCESS [
0.198 s]
[INFO] Integrations: Apache Karaf: Demo Server FAILURE [
1.945 s]
Still fails after the above changes w/ no network, but I’ve not looked at
it.
On January 18, 2019 at 16:42:47, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com)
wrote:
[ERROR
I'm still in the phase of learning things. Even if when helping
me, they did notice a regression that they opened an issue themselves ;-)
Chris
Am 15.01.19, 13:13 schrieb "Otto Fowler" :
Maybe Chris can post the Jira Issues he has opened in Daffodil?
On January 15, 2019 at 04:33:
in case this is not as expected.
Chris
Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen
--
*From:* Otto Fowler
*Sent:* Thursday, December 13, 2018 4:43:34 AM
*To:* dev@plc4x.apache.org; Christofer Dutz
*Subject:* Re: Versioning for Datablocks
What e
Not everyone wants/allows the jvm on their boxes. A small footprint c/c++
implementation can be important.
On December 21, 2018 at 08:03:14, Julian Feinauer (
j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de) wrote:
Hi all,
just a note fromm y side.
I was driving around today and thought about what we are
Congratulations everyone.
On December 2, 2018 at 10:43:50, Christofer Dutz (cd...@apache.org) wrote:
The Apache PLC4X (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of
Apache PLC4X (incubating) 0.2.0
PLC4X is a set of libraries for communicating with industrial programmable
logic
If the caller can say ‘know’ all the possible addresses ahead of time,
maybe there could be conceptually a ‘plan’ built, that would optionally be
used by the request builder
to build the best request, and cache extra data for some period of time.
So I want to read a single byte, the plan could
Am 22.02.19, 14:40 schrieb "Otto Fowler" :
It isn’t listed on the website is it?
On February 22, 2019 at 04:26:08, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Well we already have a commits@ mailing list ;-)
But if we had a separate list, I would prefer that than directing things
-1 most projects have an issues@ list for this type of thing.
Dev lists that have build, jira, github stuff spamming them stink.
Does this incubator have:
issues@
commits@
users@
setup or is it just dev@?
On February 21, 2019 at 06:22:52, Tim Mitsch (
t.mit...@pragmaticindustries.de)
Shouldn’t you call an official vote for something like this?
On March 6, 2019 at 15:29:18, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Big +1 for that ;-)
Chris
Am 06.03.19, 21:26 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" :
Hi Chris,
No offense. I agree that we should not stress those lovely
Didn't think it's worth creating
a dedicated List for that. And we can always create it and redirect as soon
as it starts really becoming annoying ... But what do the others think?
Rather create a separate list?
Chris
Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen
______
Great work Chris!
On February 11, 2019 at 10:31:05, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
I just pushed my latest work on the dynamic s7 driver.
This version is now able to connect, detect the device type and read
single-item requests. (The reason for this is currently I
I think you should fail with a -1 and cut a new RC with the right notes.
On January 24, 2019 at 08:54:18, Julian Feinauer (
j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de) wrote:
Hi all,
I just checked the RELEASE_NOTES and saw that I never changed the
"(Unreleased) 0.3.0".
Is this a problem for the release and
Congratulations
On February 5, 2019 at 07:31:41, Julian Feinauer (Apache) (
jfeina...@apache.org) wrote:
The Apache PLC4X (Incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of
Apache PLC4X (incubating) 0.3.0
This is the third official release of PLC4X.
PLC4X is a set of libraries for
The netty handlers don’t implement exceptionCaught so the default is to
spew to logs. I don’t speak german so I don’t know what the exception
message is.
Maybe the handlers should implement the method.
On April 12, 2019 at 04:56:40, Julian Feinauer (j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de)
wrote:
An
Maybe all the streams aren’t getting closed correctly?
On April 12, 2019 at 07:52:04, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote:
An exceptionCaught() event was fired, and it reached at the tail of the
pipeline. It usually means the last handler in the pipeline did not handle
the exception
on?
Chris
Am 12.04.19, 15:06 schrieb "Otto Fowler" :
I would think you’d want to handle it, and then investigate the reason for
it in this instance
On April 12, 2019 at 08:51:05, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi Otto,
I think the English translation would be
up unexpectedly")
Chris
Am 12.04.19, 13:52 schrieb "Otto Fowler" :
The netty handlers don’t implement exceptionCaught so the default is to
spew to logs. I don’t speak german so I don’t know what the exception
message is.
Maybe the handlers should implement the method.
On April 12, 201
Maybe you should cc the private@ list for the project?
On April 29, 2019 at 08:31:07, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
I just wanted to tell you that I was contacted today by Microsoft Azure
Team as well as another Company as a direct result of the media coverage
RFC 62541?
On April 18, 2019 at 05:38:56, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Perfect ;-)
Am 18.04.19, 11:34 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" :
Hi Chris,
indeed.
So lets simply use the terms opc-ua server or bridge and opc-ua client : )
Do you agree?
Julian
Am 18.04.19, 11:32
Having it separate is the way that Apache Nifi for example does it, down to
it’s own git repo as well.
On April 10, 2019 at 14:27:25, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
just wanted to keep you all in the loop (I’ll try to use the [generation]
as marker for this topic).
>From the peanut gallery this seems like a great idea.
I would say though, that this is a nice chuck of code to bring in, without
any documentation. Which means that it would be difficult to have the
*project* support it vs. Julian.
I would suggest that there be some criteria before inclusion in
And I thought Henning Wehn was the only German comedian!
On August 27, 2019 at 09:43:17, Julian Feinauer (
j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de) wrote:
: >
Am 27.08.19, 15:39 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Oh wow ... you never stop learning.
I have to remember this ... it fixes compile errors if you
usually, PMC members for a project have access to the Jira admin workbench
for a project. From there you can give people contributor roles.
If you are on the PMC, and cannot do this, then you need to check with
INFRA and maybe start a ticket.
On July 25, 2019 at 10:54:04, Julian Feinauer
Maybe the project can add sample pom files that folks can use to bootstrap
themselves, and would be commented.
On July 25, 2019 at 11:38:52, Strljic, Matthias Milan (
matthias.strl...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de) wrote:
Hey Julian,
that's what I meant by adding the required drivers. I just wanted
You could look at nifi.apache.org and metron.apache.org.
The metron site isn’t too hard to update from my experience, but I think
the nifi site is better overall.
On September 27, 2019 at 08:54:36, Christofer Dutz (
christofer.d...@c-ware.de) wrote:
Hi Julian,
well I do like how the page of
Maybe a bug in the connection pool? what do you see in netstat? maybe you
are leaking sockets?
On December 3, 2019 at 06:43:03, Sebastian Wiendl (Jira) (j...@apache.org)
wrote:
Sebastian Wiendl created PLC4X-158:
--
Summary: Too many open files after less
Nice! Inigo, have you seen the new-sh minify-cpp opc-ua support?
On December 10, 2019 at 07:34:56, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi Iñigo,
welcome to our great little project :-)
Looking forward to working with you guys.
Chris
Am 10.12.19, 09:51 schrieb "Iñigo
Hi everyone,
If you wanted to do MSPEC such that you could or could have generated the
currently supported protocols with it,
you may need to do more than this.
I have been mentioning anecdotally on slack about modbus float permutations
in the wild, and took a moment to find someplace
with that
Who is the intended user of the simulator, or users and what do they want
to accomplish? Maybe if that were spelled out or people could suggest those
cases, some number of cases could be agreed upon, allowing the initial
effort to be done with plans for later expansion to the remaining uses
cases
The packetSize= -1 because the packageSizeEstimator is null (why?)
Etienne
Le ven. 6 mars 2020 à 15:53, Otto Fowler a écrit
:
> I would recommend using https://github.com/pjkundert/cpppo to test this
> stuff to some extent.
>
> Using the docker container works well too.
>
>
>
>
>
I would recommend using https://github.com/pjkundert/cpppo to test this
stuff to some extent.
Using the docker container works well too.
On March 6, 2020 at 09:04:11, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi Robert,
unfortunately I wasn't able to test the ported driver before
You would have urls in on the page that when you clicked them executed the
search. They can click a link right? One for google, one for duckduckgo,
one for x
On January 27, 2020 at 08:50:08, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Ahh ...
ok ...
Now I got you.
Well I
A series on how to write a driver period would be great, given all the new
stuff with the protocol generation etc you guys have done.
On March 31, 2020 at 06:29:36, Lukas Ott (ott.lukas...@gmail.com) wrote:
+1 for that ;) leverage remote web meetings and record these development
session is a
Can you point to that policy?
On May 1, 2020 at 09:55:23, Justin Mclean (jus...@classsoftware.com) wrote:
HI,
> [1] https://github.com/apache/airflow#who-uses-apache-airflow
Which as far as I can see doesn’t follow ASF policy - links need to be
no-follow for starters.
Thanks,
Justin
I prefer acerbic and terse.
But thank you ;)
On April 30, 2020 at 09:18:50, Julian Feinauer (j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de)
wrote:
Hey Otto,
happy to have you in!
Nobody has such a lovely grumpiness like you bring to the team __
Julian
Am 30.04.20, 15:16 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" :
Hi all,
Where is the KEYS file for this project?
On May 15, 2020 at 12:52:01, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Apache PLC4X 0.7.0 has been staged under [2] and it’s time to vote
on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [1].
Voting will be open for 72hr.
A
nm, the keys are in the standard location :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/plc4x/KEYS
On May 15, 2020 at 23:18:24, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote:
Where is the KEYS file for this project?
On May 15, 2020 at 12:52:01, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote
33:49, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote:
-1 binding.
Does not build with java 8 as documented.
The rest seems fine.
On May 18, 2020 at 05:55:31, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
+1 Binding
Chris
[OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url spec
-1 binding.
Does not build with java 8 as documented.
The rest seems fine.
On May 18, 2020 at 05:55:31, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
+1 Binding
Chris
[OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release
vote email into a directory we’ll now call
I think you should cut another RC with the fix in it. With an Apache
project the code _IS_ the product as well. And this product (RC1) does not
work as documented.
RC’s are cheap, and we have scripts to help. What is the project based
reason to rush this?
On May 19, 2020 at 04:30:58,
That page is really nice!
You need to take a pass and remove the EIP references though.
Nice job
On March 18, 2020 at 07:20:26, Etienne Robinet (43...@etu.he2b.be) wrote:
Hi all,
I finished the EipFieldHandler with the basic types, and also the document
I talked about yesterday.
You can
+1 ( FWIW)
Followed the validation steps, built on java 8
On May 19, 2020 at 15:50:37, Lukas Ott (ott.lukas...@gmail.com) wrote:
+1 (binding)
Download all staged artifacts - OK
Verify the signature is correct - OK
Verify the SHA512 hashes - OK
Verify the existence and content of LICENSE,
I think this should be hosted and more importantly _maintained_ outside
the project. If you want to add reference to it to the project site or
something, that would be something to talk about.
On September 9, 2020 at 08:28:12, Stefano Bossi (stefano.bo...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Hi,
personally I
the MSPEC is supposed to be multi-language, so I don’t think java specific
types would go into the file definition, but there might be another way to
do something and have it generated correctly
On September 11, 2020 at 17:05:06, Ben Hutcheson (ben.hut...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Hi,
After creating a
+1
On October 14, 2020 at 05:38:26, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
currently the Java drivers are the only ones having support for the XML
testsuites I built.
Now I would like to setup the same testsuite infrastructure for my PLC4Go
drivers.
For that I would need
I would rather have multiple, clean drivers than one that is so
complicated myself.
Maybe if there was a way to structure the mspec’s such that you could
re-use or re-combine them ( ie have multiple mspecs that in some
combinations generate different drivers ).
On August 25, 2020 at 19:11:34,
Can you give examples?
On August 25, 2020 at 19:22:40, Łukasz Dywicki (l...@code-house.org) wrote:
I been trying to write new mspecs and I found that discriminator
handling is quite limiting in current form.
For example it is possible to declare a type argument, but it is not
possible to use
Can you share the full exception message / stack?
On August 14, 2020 at 03:08:11, Titus Hartmann (titus.hartma...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Hello all together,
after I developed a small adapter with plc4j I'm trying to make it work but
I always get a 'ClosedChannelException'.
Is this because of some
I thought it would have already done that
On May 29, 2020 at 05:13:12, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
I fully agree that we need such a thing.
Chris
Am 29.05.20, 10:50 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" :
Hi folks,
this is an old Issue (see
(Which were a
pain till now)
Chris
Am 27.10.20, 16:35 schrieb "Otto Fowler" :
Do you mean to develop but still in sandbox?
On October 23, 2020 at 04:38:15, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
now that I have a read-only version of a PLC4Go Modbus driver read
Do you mean using Kotlin to call PLC4x? or Using Kotlin to implement
things in plc4x?
On October 22, 2020 at 21:50:21, Patrick Boisclair (pboiscl...@noovelia.com)
wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if there is any "Contraindication" to use Kotlin with
PLC4X.
Any "unexpexted" behavior known
noter ma nouvelle adresse courriel. / Please note my new email
address." *
------
*De :* Otto Fowler
*Envoyé :* 27 octobre 2020 11:37
*À :* dev@plc4x.apache.org
*Objet :* Re: Kotlin and PLC4x
Do you mean using Kotlin to call PLC4x? or Using Kotlin to implement
things in
https://old.zeek.org/development/howtos/dpd.html
On June 30, 2020 at 13:32:57, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Just had another idea ...
How about giving this driver no real transport at all (think we have the
dummy transport ... that works like a charm) and then to provide
+1 because why not?
Most others are considering “main” or something, avoiding what you are (I
think) explicitly going for using release which as such meaning.
Can always change it back
On June 29, 2020 at 03:09:44, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
we had already
Great job Chris!
On June 23, 2020 at 08:46:19, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
I am proud and happy to announce I just finished the next milestone of my
project on porting PLC4X to C.
It was quite a marathon. I guess if you simply think about an API that is
quite
Don’t forget embedded protocols are possible,
different devices format floats differently
some devices don’t want persistent connections
etc etc
On July 15, 2020 at 20:48:39, Ben Hutcheson (ben.hut...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
Answering some of the questions:-
*I guess what would be interesting,
in some rush?
From: Lukas Ott
Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Date: December 3, 2020 at 01:52:11
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC1
yes
Am Mi., 2. Dez. 2020 um 22:43 Uhr schrieb Otto Fowler <
ottobackwa...@gmail.com>:
> you mean build tools?
>
&
Otto Fowler wrote:
> -1 (binding)
> the release notes at the top level and in the package have no information
> for this release.
>
> - also: The readme doesn’t specify the versions of:
> java
> maven
> That are supported and should be used.
>
>
>
> Fr
+1
From: Ben Hutcheson
Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Date: November 22, 2020 at 17:58:30
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Update Git Hub topics to include protocol/integration
topics
Hi,
What are people's thoughts on updating the Git Hub topics to include
protocol and
nd 12 PMC members in this project.
The Committer-to-PMC ratio is 3:2.
Community changes, past quarter:
- Ben Hutcheson was added to the PMC on 2020-11-08
- Otto Fowler was added to the PMC on 2020-10-23
- Stefano Bossi was added as committer on 2020-09-07
- Ben Hutcheson was added as committer on 20
you mean build tools?
From: Lukas Ott
Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Date: December 2, 2020 at 15:01:21
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC1
This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the
-1 (binding)
the release notes at the top level and in the package have no information
for this release.
- also: The readme doesn’t specify the versions of:
java
maven
That are supported and should be used.
From: Christofer Dutz
Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Date: December 2, 2020 at
+1 binding
java version "1.8.0_171"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-b11)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.171-b11, mixed mode)
> On Dec 13, 2020, at 10:52, Lukas Ott wrote:
>
> Apache PLC4X Build-Tools Code-Generation 1.4.0 has been staged under [2]
> and it’s
de-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip
>
> Am Mo., 14. Dez. 2020 um 04:26 Uhr schrieb Otto Fowler <
> ottobackwa...@gmail.com>:
>
>> gsha512sum -c apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512
>> gsha512sum: apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-sou
Create the jira and assign it to me, I’ll see what I can do
> On Dec 23, 2020, at 09:18, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> so if you happen to be looking for something sensible to do while in lockdown
> during the christmas holidays.
> I think I have something for you :)
>
> While mspec
Do you have an antlr grammar?
There is a plugin to bridge those to idea language plugins
> On Dec 23, 2020, at 09:18, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> so if you happen to be looking for something sensible to do while in lockdown
> during the christmas holidays.
> I think I have
or, we can follow versioning rules and have the ‘new kafka sink’ trigger a
proper release that allows breaking backwards compatibility
From: Christofer Dutz
Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Date: November 20, 2020 at 06:08:51
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] How about changing the
Is it a breaking change? Is anyone using it?
I would be fine with changing it, but we would need to be clear on those
things.
Also, I think the names should reflect what the project uses,
plcfields not fields etc
From: Ben Hutcheson
Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Date: November 7, 2020 at
sorry
if field has handler -> handler() else parentHandler()
On October 30, 2020 at 13:37:51, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Why not optionally set a handler per field -or- for the whole thing?
if field has handlerer
On October 30, 2020 at 11:42:36, Christofer D
Why not optionally set a handler per field -or- for the whole thing?
if field has handlerer
On October 30, 2020 at 11:42:36, Christofer Dutz (christofer.d...@c-ware.de)
wrote:
Hi all,
while doing the refactoring of the field handlers, and cleaning up in the
SPI, I did come across the
n?
Chris
Am 30.10.20, 18:38 schrieb "Otto Fowler" :
sorry
if field has handler -> handler() else parentHandler()
On October 30, 2020 at 13:37:51, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Why not optionally set a handler per field -or- for the whole thing?
if field has han
I started a poc plugin for IntelliJ that I will try to work on when I can, but
writing a language plugin that does anything substantial is not easy even when
you know the language inside and out, and I do not have full time job time to
throw at it.
I can’t guarantee I’ll have anything soon, so
Sounds fine to me.
+1
> On Jan 21, 2021, at 05:26, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> a little discussion on the IoTDB list made me realize that I never actually
> discussed this here and I'd like to do it before we start the next release.
>
> This will be the first containing Go
I’m getting errors building the docker image. Did we try this lately?
Step 23/39 : RUN ./mvnw -P
with-boost,with-c,with-cpp,with-dotnet,with-go,with-logstash,with-opcua-werver,with-proxies,with-python,with-logstash,with-sandbox
+1 Binding
> On Jan 25, 2021, at 15:14, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
> Apache PLC4X 0.8.0 has been staged under [2] and it's time to vote
> on accepting it for release. All Maven artifacts are available under [1].
> Voting will be open for 72hr.
>
> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding
ce address
>>> String' containing the list of variable to read. From this we deduce the
>>> expected Avro datatype when reading, for instance, a word in S7 or a coil
>>> in Modbus.
>>>
>>> However, as you mentioned, the other approach will be much cl
April 2021 15:34
>>>> An: dev
>>>> Betreff: Re: AW: Nifi integration record oriented processor for reading
>>>>
>>>> Hi Otto, Chris,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I think the approach you propose will be best. By now, we are
>>&g
Iñigo Angulo br/>>>>> Gesendet:
FFreitag, 23. April 2021 15:34
>>>> An: dev
>>>> Betreff: Re: AW: Nifi integration record oriented processor for
reading
>>>> br/>>>>> Hi Otto, Chris, <
>>>> br/>>>>> Yes,
+1
> On May 12, 2021, at 04:19, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I recently had a look at our Sandbox, and I'd like to clean it up a bit.
> There's quite some stuff in there, that will probably not be updated
> anymore.
>
> I would like to remove the StreamPipes stuff as the
Welcome!
> On May 7, 2021, at 07:39, Christofer Dutz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> please welcome Thomas to the PLC4X family.
> He has been doing an outstanding job getting my POC-quality PLC4C
> drivers into shape. I am extremely thankful for that :-)
>
> Looking forward to lot's of cool
You should file a bug report. You can create a login and file.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
> On Jun 2, 2021, at 06:40, Torsten Uhr wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I’m using the OPCUA driver of plc4j 0.8.0 and I have a problem related tot he
> closed Ticket
k. We will fill the ICLA document too.
>>
>> thank you
>> iñigo
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Iñigo Angulo
>>
>> ZYLK.net :: consultoría.openSource
>> telf.: 747412337
>> Ribera de Axpe, 11
>
The last message for the Nifi PR was they were working on their changes and had
not committed them. They were looking for comment on the way they came up with
getting the datatype from the response object, if you could comment. I don’t
know if what they have is right or not.
> On May 26,
Some protocols the discovery process returns information about the device
(DCP, ENIP) , that might be important as well. How would this be handled /
modeled ?
The idea here is that plc4x doesn’t store any of this right? You’d have to
handle the callback and store the information yourself?
Since getDriver is a string why not just change the javadoc and
implementation such that it accepts either?
if (isURI(s)) {
}
That way it will keep on keeping on for the volk that are already using it.
Maybe on top of that we use the actual types we want instead of strings,
like java.net.URI
Enip and Profinet Discovery and configuration protocol may ‘switch’ after
discovery.
Like, you send ENIP Identify on udp, and then connect on tcp to do other
commands I believe.
Also, you may use DCP to discover things, and then use s7 to talk to them (
the DCP identity response is over link
+1
From: Christofer Dutz
Reply: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Date: June 30, 2021 at 05:25:51
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Extend our Jira Issue format to allow selection of
"component" and "language"?
Hi all,
as we are more and more polyglot, the question of "What language does
ration record oriented processor for reading
>
> Hi all,
>
> Well, you get PlcValues from the response that wrap the different datatypes.
> So generally you shouldn't care about the detail type.
>
> However, you can call getObject() which returns the core value the
iented processor for reading
>
> Hi all,
>
> Well, you get PlcValues from the response that wrap the different datatypes.
> So generally you shouldn't care about the detail type.
>
> However, you can call getObject() which returns the core value the plc-value
> has ... so
iented processor for reading
>
> The more I think of it,
>
> Perhaps we should also think of potentially providing some information on
> supported configuration options.
> Wouldn't it be cool if the driver could say: "I generally have these options
> and they have these datatypes and me
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
