Where would you like the code committed? The less work for me, the
faster it will happen.
Regards,
Peter.
On 1/09/2015 12:36 AM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Yes and no. He put the sources in a jar file inside the deps-lib/rc-libs
folder in the qa-refactor branch.
Branch is at:
https
I'd appreciate it Bryan, use the version in the qa_suite, the version
on Sourceforge is older.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/river/jtsk/skunk/qa_refactor/trunk/dep-libs/rc-libs/
Thanks,
Peter.
On 30/08/2015 9:54 PM, Bryan Thompson wrote:
Peter, would you be open to having someone else
On 30/08/2015 9:50 PM, Bryan Thompson wrote:
Peter,
I like the solution. I have two questions. One related to the radmap. The
other related to river and IoT.
First, this a 3.1 release road map issue?
Yes.
It would be nice to be able to
move to a 3.0 now and have a development road map
in the implementation.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Peter.
On 31/08/2015 12:04 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
One objective should be a really clear, and clearly articulated,
distinction between public APIs and implementation.
I would like to see all implementation code marked in one of three ways:
non
in the javadoc.
I'm a little busy right now to consider moving custard apple. If you
wan't you can always copy only the code in use into org.apache.river.impl
Regards,
Peter.
On 10/08/2015 11:28 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Peter:
All other things equal, I’d like to keep the core of River free of external
Hmm, I forgot about OSX, and static analysis.
FreeBSD still has some socket issues BTW.
Users with latent concurrency bugs are also likely to have these
exposed, so should test user code thoroughly.
Regards,
Peter.
On 11/08/2015 7:19 PM, Peter wrote:
On 11/08/2015 8:33 AM, Patricia
code duplication and allows the user
to benefit from new performance improvements in popular collections.
Regards,
Peter.
On 12/08/2015 8:57 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Does it have a license that lets us do that?
(If you are the writer, and copy it in yourself, it would be covered
by your
On 11/08/2015 8:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Which Java version(s) should be supported for release 3.0?
It would simplify testing if we only support JDK 8.
Because of changes such as the package renaming, I expect users to
need to do their own development and testing to use the new
...
Regards,
Peter.
On 10/08/2015 2:00 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
In that case, I'll take on the actual release manager role, and get
going on dealing with the dependency issue.
On 8/9/2015 8:38 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Pat:
I can provide support and information for you. But I do think we
+1 Peter.
On 10/08/2015 11:52 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 8/7/2015 12:58 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Hello all:
Please review and vote on the release of Apache River Examples v1.0
The staging repository is at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheriver
+1 Peter
On 10/08/2015 2:05 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
This is what I propose to file in the next couple of days. I have made
changes to reflect progress on the Release 3.0 issue.
PMC Members - please vote on this report. Your affirmative vote will
both indicate that we have an active PMC
(from
identical context) by weakly caching (by caller context's) the result of
security checks, this reduces unnecessary network traffic caused by
duplicated security checks.
Only custard-apple is required.
Peter.
On 10/08/2015 6:04 PM, Peter wrote:
Pat,
I don't have much time, but I'll
+1 Peter
On 7/08/2015 5:02 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
This version incorporates ideas from the discussion in the Draft
report thread.
===
Report from the Apache River committee [Patricia Shanahan]
## Description:
- Apache
a platform that supports both Java and Android,
however it wouldn't be backward compatible with Jini.
The challenge isn't technical, the challenge is getting the community on
board.
Hi All,
Peter Firmstone obviously looked at this about 5 years ago, and even
raised a support question
https
Hi Dennis,
The full story is documented in net.jini.loader.ClassLoading, I've
appended the javadoc below.
The quick summary is that Greg and Sim's works were integrated and
functionality of both was retained, but their class names weren't in
order to retain compatibility with existing
+1 Peter.
I also reccommend investigating and identifying bottlenecks first; this
will benefit other users as well.
Also, if there is any chance the bottleneck is in River, I would be
very, very interested in constructing a benchmark based on your workload
that demonstrates the scaling
Yes,
Should run fine from within Netbeans,I haven't tried Eclipse, but it
should also work. Unlike previous builds, it doesn't need cigwin and
it builds on jvm's other than Sun's, such as IBM's J9.
Peter.
On 27/05/2015 6:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I'll check out that branch and take
+1
suggestion:
org.apache.river namespace is split into org.apache.river.api and
org.apache.river.impl as per dev discussions some time ago.
Also suggest that start is moved into api and discovery constraints moved into
net.jini namespace.
Pete.
- Original message -
+1 : I approve
normalisation became a hotspot, so
it was replaced by bitshift operations.
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
Started a different thread to not conflate the other.
We are using Java 8 at AFRL, with River 2.2.2, Rio and SORCER
(https://github.com/mwsobol/SORCER) and don’t see any
Fair comment, let's try to understand the problem domain better first.
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
Peter:
Could you expand on “dynamic multiple IP endpoints for clients”? Are
you thinking of load balancing, failover, or what?
In the case of failover, I’d tend to say
Thanks Brian, very interesting.
Regarding high availability and self healing, would you reccommend River
support using zookeeper?
If so, how are you using it?
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
We've built a scalable distributed graph database using river (
www.blazegraph.com
best to build the actual release version you're using, but if you
can provide a little more information, perhaps we can help figure out what's
going wrong?
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
Hi all,
In an arduous twisty little maze of trying to track down an unexpected
, at least not until Oracle decided to
make their sctp implementation public.
Cheers,
Peter.
- Original message -
While I don't have an immediate use-case for this (all our River code
runs in a very trusted environment), I just wanted to say that I think
this is very interesting
HIP looks very promising. Certainly solve a number of issues for River.
Jini outran the capabilities of the underlying java platform (class identity,
resolution and isolation) and underlying network protocols.
Hopefully one day these issues will be resolved.
Cheers,
Peter.
- Original
serialization is not specific to River, I wonder
if there’s a better forum for these kinds of deep discussions. I
think it makes River look far harder than it is.
Cheers,
Greg Trasuk.
On Feb 19, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Peter j...@zeus.net.au wrote:
What are your thoughts
on defining some goals, we can look at how
we can better align our security api's with those goals.
My original interest in River was for untrusted networks.
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
BTW - I'm really interested in the reasoning why deserialization code
does not call
What are your thoughts on security?
Is it important to you? Is it important for River?
Regards,
Peter.
Has anyone run any tests on the RasPi?
The arm hardware I tested on was on loan to Apache from Dell Calexeda -
server hardware.
Peter.
- Original message -
On 18/02/15 13:09, Bishnu Gautam wrote:
We are trying to deploy River in Raspberry pi.
...
Our problem is that we need
That's good news, well done!
On 18/02/2015 3:32 AM, amit batajoo wrote:
Hello Peter,
Thank you for your support and suggestion, finally I successfully run
the apache-river and hello world program example on my linux
environment with java version 1.8.0.
Here are the screenshot of my success
, and ServiceItemFilter.
In other words, this additional functionality requires minimal effort on
behalf of the developer, while those who don't need it can remain
blissfully ignorant and implement it later if they want to.
I haven't uploaded to svn, would you like to see some patches?
Regards,
Peter.
library installed on your Rasberry PI?
I can walk you through the build and test instructions.
I'd like to confirm your not experiencing a bug first, by checking all
tests run properly.
Regards,
Peter.
On 18/02/2015 9:09 PM, Bishnu Gautam wrote:
Hi Peter
We are trying to deploy River
Some standard java se components are missing from compact 2:
Compiling 905 source files to
C:\Users\peter\Documents\NetBeansProjects\peterConcurrentPolicy\build\classes
javac 1.8.0
C:\Users\peter\Documents\NetBeansProjects\peterConcurrentPolicy\src\com\sun\jini\discovery\kerberos\Client.java
, there are some
changes made in trunk I need to merge in before pre release.
I'm currently investigating securing ObjectInputStream against DOS attacks.
Regards,
Peter.
the examples rather than to remove it
from the examples.
Yes, I agree.
Patricia
On 2/13/2015 7:48 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Hi Peter:
I’m not sure if supporting MAF is critical to River’s success, but
even so I am in favour of removing the examples from the JTSK build.
Anyone else have
Hi Mike,
Which build platform?
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
Following along in https://river.apache.org/building-river.html, I
$ cd $RIVER_HOME
$ ant
...
jsk-dl.jar:
[java] Exception in thread main
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 5735
Maf 2.1.0 supports java 8 compact profile 2.
If I remove the browser example from qa-refactor it builds on this profile.
Greg, if your including the browser in the river examples project, I can delete
it?
If so, we can support iphone and android.
Regards,
Peter.
made the assumption that you're running this on a rasberry pi, but then I
remembered that java se embedded should be a later version of java.
- Original message -
javHi Peter,
Still I am getting same error message even after changing the
java-version from to jdk1.6.0_34, and changed
the limit, until the outer array returns,
otherwise it can quickly consume all available memory with as little as
four objects, the jvm allocating space for all element references with
each array object creation.
Peter.
On 12/02/2015 12:15 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
How do the array length
,
Peter.
this will work, but it's worth trying. The only
build tested and known to work on ARM is qa-refactor which is an
experimental unreleased build. These are old examples, since Java 6,
it's best to define the security manager as above.
let me know how you fare.
Regards,
Peter.
On 9/02/2015 5:00 PM
AM, Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au wrote:
The qa-refactor build fully supports Windows file paths, so Window's
users won't need cigwin when it's eventually released.
Cygwin is there because people like the Unix command line, not because
Java doesn’t work.
I was thinking it might
,
Greg Trasuk
On Feb 9, 2015, at 2:00 AM, amit batajoo batajooseam...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi peter
I am trying apache-river-2.2.2 in linux debian. I have successfully
run the httpd.sh script but while i am trying to jrmp-reggie.sh I am
getting give error, please help to solve this problem
build?
Regards,
Peter.
On 9/02/2015 4:55 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 2/8/2015 10:30 PM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
Auto-correct apparently doesn’t recognize “jvm” and changed it to
“jam” below :-)
The only good auto-correct is a disabled auto-correct.
Greg Trasuk.
On Feb 9, 2015, at 1:22
to implement, and much easier to evolve than
default serialization, some users may wish to use it anyway (it's also
final field friendly), but it is definitely intended to be optional.
Regards,
Peter.
On 8/02/2015 6:11 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Thanks Dan, hopefully I don't dissapoint.
... So
constructor.
... to be continued, until next time.
Cheers,
Peter.
On 5/02/2015 2:38 AM, Dan Rollo wrote:
Very interesting. Looking forward to the next episode.
On Feb 4, 2015, at 9:11 AM, dev-digest-h...@river.apache.org wrote:
to be continued...
to a
public constructor.
... to be continued, until next time.
Cheers,
Peter.
On 5/02/2015 2:38 AM, Dan Rollo wrote:
Very interesting. Looking forward to the next episode.
On Feb 4, 2015, at 9:11 AM, dev-digest-h...@river.apache.org wrote:
to be continued...
annoying River concurrency bug, these always seem to pop up when
you're in the middle of something, taking days off the actual project.
Regards,
Peter.
security, why don't you try building a stripped down version
using ClassDep.
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
I am interested in 2 items that fall under the category Ancient and
Hairy History:
1. The Surrogate Architecture spec seems to have fallen off the bus
somewhere along
Hi Amit,
I'm on the road at present. It looks like a policy issue, since jdk 1.6 it is
better to specify the security manager from the command line, with the policy
file declaration immediately following.
I can't read the image with the 4 terminal windows from my phone.
Regards,
Peter
Noticed this morning when trying browse jira issues that the main page is full
of dead links, is there something wrong with the Jira server, these links don't
look like they should be dead?
Peter.
+1 Peter.
- Original message -
I don't see why it would need a vote.
It sounds like a good plan to me.
+1 (just in case)
On 20 Nov 2014 16:06, Greg Trasuk tras...@stratuscom.com wrote:
Actually, I had a better idea.
How about if I pull out the ‘tools’ package
The code in qa-refactor has been upgraded to support jdk8, could backport that
if you want.
No objection to changing package name.
Cheers,
Peter.
- Original message -
Hi all:
I’m working on getting the build system, particularly ‘classdepandjar’
to work under JDK8. While I’m
I haven't tested new language features, it's only been modified to allow River
to build on JDK8
- Original message -
The code in qa-refactor has been upgraded to support jdk8, could
backport that if you want.
No objection to changing package name.
Cheers,
Peter
Hi Amit,
Are you using a recent version of River? While it should work, I haven't tried
using Jini 2.1 with Java 1.7.
Have you checked if you can download reggie-dl.jar from your webserver, eg
using a web browser?
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
Dear Peter.
Thank you very
Thanks Gregg,
That looks like the problem.
Cheers,
Peter.
On 27/10/2014 12:37 PM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
Most Likely, you used the default settings on netbeans editor configuration
which I believe is to replace all tabs with spaces. A sad default…
Gregg Wonderly
On Oct 26, 2014, at 8
FYI.
Regards,
Peter.
Original Message
Subject: Jenkins build is back to normal :
river-ServiceDiscoveryManagerTests #142
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:44:55 + (UTC)
From: Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.org
To: j...@zeus.net.au
Seehttps
it and report any issues.
Cheers,
Peter.
Hot Spots - Method,Self time [%],Self time,Self time (CPU),Samples
java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0[native](),39.177204,106888.146
ms,106888.146 ms,23
java.net.DualStackPlainSocketImpl.accept0[native](),30.980734,84525.51
ms,84525.51 ms,4
.
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/rmi/enhancements-7.html
Try setting the property *|java.rmi.server.useCodebaseOnly|* to false.
Regards,
Peter.
On 27/10/2014 10:20 PM, amit batajoo wrote:
Dear Peter.
Thank you very much for your previous instruction.
Recently I am facing
has time to help, by running the jtreg
tests, creating a beta or preview release, that would be greatly
appreciated.
Regards,
Peter.
On 27/10/2014 10:29 PM, Bryan Thompson wrote:
Sounds great!
What are the plans to move to a beta or preview release?
Bryan
Bryan Thompson
Chief Scientist
previous occassion.
I'm going to stop developing on River until I resolve this issue or set
up a Unix computer for development.
Regards,
Peter.
directory, using a jvm command line argument.
Most books are now quite dated, but are still useful. Google Jan Newmarch's
Jini tutorial for tips on configuration and getting started.
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
Dear Apache Developers
My name is Amit Batajoo, Research student
There isn't a jini2.1.jar. jsk-platform.jar, jsk-lib.jar provide the Jini
programming api. jsk-policy.jar is necessary for security.
http://jan.newmarch.name/java/jini/tutorial/Jini.html
Will dig up some more links for you later.
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
Dear Peter
tests.
Then I'll produce some release candidates for wider testing.
Regards,
Peter.
I've finally solved the random test failures in ServiceDiscoveryManager,
this has taken considerable time, I'll be performing some more test runs
before committing.
Regards,
Peter.
On 28/08/2014 9:29 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
Seehttps://builds.apache.org/job/river
+1 Peter.
- Original message -
Looks fine to me.
+1
On 6 Aug 2014 00:37, Patricia Shanahan p...@acm.org wrote:
This is a draft of the August report to the board on River. Please
suggest any corrections or improvements.
I think the board likes at least the month on actions
with
locks, classloading and policy providers, rather than sockets.
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
Are there benchmarks for network performance in the River test suite?
Thanks,
Bryan
Hi Patricia,
It's in the main build directory under rc-libs, it's also available on
sourceforge, a project called custard apple.
In case you're wondering, it's a library that wraps the ability to cache
using timed, weak or soft references with any java collection
implementation.
Peter
Thanks Gavin.
On 13/07/2014 6:02 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
Good Day Devs,
Our Jenkins Instance has some slaves being replaced.
Specifically those labelled 'ubuntu[1,2,4,5,6]' are being replaced with
slaves already online called 'ubuntu-[1,2,4,5,6] (notice the dash -).
You are getting this
Any ideas for Serializable 2.0?
Peter.
Original Message
Subject:Re: JEP 187 Serializable 2.0
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:52:33 -0400
From: Brian Goetz brian.go...@oracle.com
To: Peter Firmstone peter.firmst...@zeus.net.au
Where should I post the writeup
/library/se-lookahead/index.html
Regards,
Peter.
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
* The ASF licenses
/test/impl/start/ServiceStarterCreateBadTransientServiceTest.td
You don't need cigwin to build on Windows with qa-refactor.
On 8/07/2014 7:50 AM, Peter wrote:
I use netbeans but setup properties will be similar.
Set the following as source directories:
./src
./qa/src
./qa/harness
then set
on the road presently,, no computer at hand, will help some more soon.
,Peter.
- Original message -
I've forgotten the recipe for building River :-(
I would like to use Eclipse.
Patricia
On 7/6/2014 8:11 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 7/6/2014 7:10 PM, Peter wrote:
I could
online,,
securing Serialization would be a priority.
Then there's the modularisation effort started by Dennis Reedy.
Further down the track, i'd like to do something with dynamic code generation
for remote Lambda expressions, using ASM.
Peter.
- Original message -
I'm now
How about Portable?
On 1/07/2014 12:55 AM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
So, maybe transportable or transported or forwarded…
Gregg
On Jun 29, 2014, at 4:41 AM, Peter Firmstonej...@zeus.net.au wrote:
Hi Gregg,
Thinking out loud:
Transferable, I think it's close, it works
) + semino (I plant, I sow).
Cheers,
Peter.
On 29/06/2014 1:32 PM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
TransferableObjectFactory?
Gregg
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Stefano Marianis.mari...@unibo.it wrote:
Il giorno 23/giu/2014, alle ore 13:24, Peter
Firmstonej...@zeus.net.aumailto:j
Actually an implementer of Distributed can create a SerialObjectFactory that
contains itself, but there's no logical reason to do so.
Peter.
- Original message -
- Original message -
1. I understand Memento is an interface and ReflectiveMemento - an
implementation
2
Any objections to calling it Momento?
- Original message -
You're sharp, so it is, that's a good one.
- Original message -
It really is a Memento. Isn't it?
Michal
23 cze 2014 13:24 Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au napisał(a):
Distributed object use
serialized, a Distributed object implementation can refer to itself, but it's
up to the implementation to wire up dependencies when its constructor is called.
It's quite a corner case though.
You're welcome, cheers,
Peter.
Thanks,
Michal
On Thursday 26 of June 2014 20:53:03 Peter wrote
()
Thanks,
Michal
On Thursday 26 of June 2014 20:53:03 Peter wrote:
Any objections to calling it Momento?
- Original message -
You're sharp, so it is, that's a good one.
- Original message -
It really is a Memento. Isn't it?
Michal
Perhaps RecreateDistributed, it doesn't strictly deserialise or unmarshall, it
re-create's objects, distributed across networks and time.
Regards,
Peter.
- Original message -
Il giorno 23/giu/2014, alle ore 15:00, Peter
j...@zeus.net.aumailto:j...@zeus.net.au ha scritto
replacement for
LookupLocator. Just mark LookupLocator as deprecated and don’t waste
any time on it.
We might want to think about changing Reggie so it defaults to
DiscoveryV2. Right now v1 is the default.
Greg Trasuk.
On Jun 24, 2014, at 6:12 AM, Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au wrote
Every drop counts.
- Original message -
Fine for me, but I'm only a drop in the ocean :)
Il giorno 25/giu/2014, alle ore 12:17, Peter
j...@zeus.net.aumailto:j...@zeus.net.au ha scritto:
Perhaps RecreateDistributed, it doesn't strictly deserialise or
unmarshall, it re-create's
You're sharp, so it is, that's a good one.
- Original message -
It really is a Memento. Isn't it?
Michal
23 cze 2014 13:24 Peter Firmstone j...@zeus.net.au napisał(a):
Distributed object use SerialReflectionFactory to recreate themselves
remotely using one of their public
, for
migration purposes only.
Doing so will allow LookupLocator to function using either Discovery V1
or V2.
This also reduces code duplication, presently there are two
implementations of client side Discovery V1, this will reduce that to
one implementation only.
Regards,
Peter.
Interesting coincidence, I'll go over the recent discussion to familiarise
myself.
Thanks,
Peter.
- Original message -
[+openjdk mailing lists]
Yeah, I'm trying to excise all the networking code from TLR and
SplittableRandom.
There is also likely to be a missing wrapping
, that is, it
uses reflection. At some point in time, we might decide we want to use
something other than reflection, in that case, the name would be
inappropriate.
How does DistributedObjectFactory sound?
Has anyone got a better name?
Regards,
Peter.
, that is, it
uses reflection. At some point in time, we might decide we want to use
something other than reflection, in that case, the name would be
inappropriate.
How does DistributedObjectFactory sound?
Has anyone got a better name?
Regards,
Peter.
Due to the number of test results being emailed to the list, I've now
diverted them to my own email address, any interesting failures will be
relayed to dev@river.apache.org manually from now on.
Regards,
Peter.
the best parts of the
serializable object framework.
DistributedRecreator? Rather than create or factory it tends to imply
recreation.
Perhaps a play on Refactor, such as DistributedRefactory? To indicate that
change is allowed and expected?
Peter.
- Original message -
Il giorno 23/giu
to prevent release.
Please feel free to assist solving these two issues if you have time.
Before we release we need to integrate Sim's network changes from trunk, then
we should be good for test releases.
Regards,
Peter.
Finally, a relevant test failure.
- Original message -
See https://builds.apache.org/job/river-ServiceDiscoveryManagerTests/9/
--
[...truncated 8312 lines...]
[java] Adding test:
That's a good idea, thanks.
Peter.
- Original message -
So something somewhere is writing to stdout. I would suggest making the
test suite redirect go through a pair of InputStream/OutputStream
proxies which would hex dump all data to private files for subsequent
review.
Gregg
lambda's less
susceptible to breakage.
The point where breakage could occur is during serialization at runtime,
if the lambda calls object methods, deserialization will be problem free.
Regards,
Peter.
On 28/05/2014 10:33 PM, Bryan Thompson wrote:
How stable is the lamba translation
Take one very simple class, compile it and process it with ASMifier and
guess what?
Classes that implement functional interfaces are compiled to contain
synthetic bridge methods that check Generic type casts!
In other news I'm still waiting for a Jenkins run to complete without
someone
On 25/05/2014 11:07 AM, Greg Trasuk wrote:
On May 24, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Peter Firmstonej...@zeus.net.au wrote:
On 23/05/2014 9:53 PM, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote:
Yes, if possible we could sync up the trunk, by visual diffing trunk and
qa_refactor, merging patches into trunk, commiting
Jini has a small but loyal user base in financial services.
Looks like River is building on J9, real time java and IIOP seems to be
working too.
I'm not expecting many tests to pass at this stage, since many
permissions will be different, at least it's all compilling now.
Cheers,
Peter
[java]
[java] -
[java] STARTING TO RUN THE TESTS
[java]
[java]
On 22/05/2014 9:10 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
Jini has a small but loyal user base in financial services.
Looks like River is building on J9, real time java and IIOP seems
time out, to do something easy, at least
compared to the hair pulling concurrency bugs and race conditions I've
been focused on.
Cheers,
Peter.
On 22/05/2014 9:31 PM, Bryan Thompson wrote:
This is all good, but I would personally be interested in getting to a
release based on the QA branch
, it would
definitely helpful. Jenkins seems more suited to short test runs.
Regards,
Peter.
On 22/05/2014 9:24 PM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
[java] -
[java] GENERAL HARNESS CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
[java]
[java]Date started
: com.sun.jini.qa.harness.TestException: -- failure --
nAdded = 3, nAddedExpected = 4, nRemoved = 1, nRemovedExpected = 2
ant -f
C:\\Users\\peter\\Documents\\NetBeansProjects\\peterConcurrentPolicy
qa.run-tests
qa.run-tests:
qa.james-brown:
Deleting directory
C:\Users\peter\Documents\NetBeansProjects
501 - 600 of 1121 matches
Mail list logo
