Re: [royale-compiler] 09/20: change more flexjs to royale per Issue #17

I came up with an idea. I created enough issues to track other things I noticed in changing over to Royale such that I could create issue #17 for the change over. HTH, -Alex On 10/4/17, 7:58 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >Hi Piotr, > >I have no

Re: [royale-compiler] 09/20: change more flexjs to royale per Issue #17

rotection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitbox.a >>pache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Froyale-compiler.git=02%7C01%7C%7C60118b04c >>c804aff6eb608d50b7966f8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 >>27538410858041=z7fhOECHDeBHnMINms5g4FeootpfFJAi3HV3S9z2aug%3D >>ved=0 >>

Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)

%2Fgithub.co >m%2Fblog%2F2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing=02%7C01%7C%7Cdfa4e446 >61f04aca4c1a08d50ad92538%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364 >26850111393184=6FAJXFa81NJY%2FG7FHdKpbnZq3N8arcYV1reW1uDWlVQ%3D >rved=0 > >Thanks, >Om > >On Tue, Oct 3, 2017

Re: Nightly Builds Available

h for renaming. Packaging could be >merge to develop, than we could create new branch for renaming. It should >be under folder feature/name - cause Maven build.a.o will pickup it >automatically. > >That's how I think would be the best. > >Piotr > >2017-10-02 1:17 GMT+02:00 Ale

Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)

t;: > >> royale-docs is good. >> >> > On Oct 3, 2017, at 9:36 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > I prefer royale-docs >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Om >> > >> > On Oc

Re: [Royale] Flex to FlexJS migration path

t; columns could be merged and an icon >>> would indicate if this closest implementation sits in the FlexJS/Royale >>> world or the MDL world. >>> (is "Apache Royale" the new designation of "FlexJS" ? And should I drop >>> entirely "FlexJS"

Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)

Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content? I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages. Then we ask Infra to hook it up as our project's pages. Thanks, -Alex On 10/3/17, 1:17 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>

Re: [Royale] Flex to FlexJS migration path

, at 11:22 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> GH Pages is likely the way to go. Maybe we could make the comparison an >>interactive Royale app… ;-) >> >>> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:18 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>> >>> OK

Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)

Done. Do I need to make a gh-pages branch? > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:35 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Royale-docs has been created. Can someone put in some initial content? > I'm buried in the rename and don't want to stop to figure out GH Pages. > Then

Re: Initial Board Report

ebsite will be pass to them and >we >will be able to use it. > >Piotr > >2017-10-10 18:31 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> OK, I guess I wasn't paying attention. Still, my understanding is that >> Trademarks did not approve royalysdk.o

Re: Initial Board Report

ot;royalesdk.org". Infra will takes it off my >hands >when the 60 day ICANN transfer timeout has run out (?). > >EdB > > > >On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> I thought one of the outcomes was that Inf

Re: [Maven|Royale] Pipeline for feature/rename branch

k we should skip and make the changes after rename. Let's not hold >on >this one. Do we have issue on github for that tests ? If yes let's move >forward. > >Piotr > >2017-10-10 6:44 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> OK, it looks like I fi

Re: [Maven|Royale] Pipeline for feature/rename branch

ne. >>> >>> I have plan to make distribution the same usable as ANT build, but this >>> is going to happen after we will have setup everything. >>> >>> 1) I will change those folders in distribution >>> 2) I will try to make changes FALCON_HOME e

Re: [royale-asjs] 05/09: another sweep of flex replaced by royale per Issue #17. This is hard because we use 'flex' in 'flexUnit' and in flex box css properties

Pretty sure that Flash Builder will be looking for flex-sdk-description.xml. It might be that Flash Builder users will have to run an Ant script to fully set up their SDKs and we could use that to rename a royale-sdk-description file. Thoughts? -Alex On 10/14/17, 1:58 PM, "Harbs"

Re: [Royale] Using nightly builds

Hi Nicolas, These errors imply that an older version of the compiler is being used, instead of the one in the Nightly, since it worked for Piotr in Moonshine. Hopefully Josh can figure that out. -Alex On 10/5/17, 8:15 AM, "Idylog - Nicolas Granon" wrote: >Relaunched a

Re: Flex2Royale

IIRC, Om was working on this to some degree. One plan was to convert FXG to SVG. AIUI, a SkinnableContainer wouldn't be that hard. Container already has an inner div to hold the children, so a different view could have the outer div display SVG behind the children. I think there were more

Re: [royale-asjs] 05/09: another sweep of flex replaced by royale per Issue #17. This is hard because we use 'flex' in 'flexUnit' and in flex box css properties

S Code extension requires flex-sdk-description too. >> >> I think we should include both flex-sdk-description and >> royale-sdk-description for now. We can deprecate flex-sdk-description at >> some point in the future, but I think we should try and make the >>migration

Re: Flex2Royale

visuals to put the themeing feature on >the >plate, one could be wireframe theme and another something more elaborated. > > > > >2017-10-16 18:04 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> IIRC, Om was working on this to some degree. One plan was to conver

Re: [Maven|Royale] Pipeline for feature/rename branch

to merge the rename branch >> into >> >> develop today. >> >> >> >>> On Oct 17, 2017, at 9:07 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Bump. >> >>> >> >>> Is there any reason to

Re: Initial Board Report

On 10/13/17, 3:13 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >Thanks. Filed. > >All in all it was a pretty painless process. Whimsy is a nice tool. :-) > >Harbs > >> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:23 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>wrote:

Re: Welcome Royale Developers

Thanks Piotr, Looks like Nabble is hooked up. Did you set up Nabble for users@ as well? There are currently only 3 of us subscribed to this list. Time to go tell others to subscribe. -Alex On 9/27/17, 9:31 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >Hello Royale Developers, > >Welcome

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

are.nl> wrote: >Well, some double work never hurts... Oh, wait :-( > >How do we coordinate this in the future? > >EdB > > > >On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> Hi Erik, >> >> Actually, I h

Re: Product branding

That path to playerglobal should not be in flex-sdk. It could point to an IDE package of Apache Flex though. On 9/28/17, 3:48 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: >Nope, I'm still in the READme of the asjs repo, I'm trying to understand >and fix the circular dependencies in that

Re: Product branding

My PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME does not point inside a flex-sdk repo. It really shouldn't. We allowed it because some folks wanted to point to an Apache Flex IDE configuration, but Apache Flex works fine when developing without an IDE by pointing PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME elsewhere. And that's safer since you

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

Hi Erik, Actually, I have a lot of changes queued up in the packaging branch for royale-asjs. Do we know if the "hubot" is still discarding commits? My goal for today was to get the Ant builds working on apacheflexbuilds CI server. Thanks, -Alex On 9/28/17, 5:27 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

OK, I subscribed Nabble. Let's see if it picks this up. On 9/28/17, 9:47 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >Piotr, > >Is Nabble working? I don't think I'm seeing that it has an archive of >threads? > >If not, send me the Nabble info off l

Re: Product branding

ght not seem a priority, but if >setting up a dev machine is anything but dead simple - or at least very >clear - it will make me less motivated. If I have to guess or ask about >more than a few steps in getting this set up, you've lost me. So to speak. > >EdB > > > >On Thu,

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

m> wrote: >I believe it should already pickup our emails, but it's not... :/ > >Piotr > >2017-09-28 20:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> OK, I subscribed Nabble. Let's see if it picks this up. >> >> On 9/28/17, 9:47 AM, &

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

>d41a706c308d506b279fa%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364222 >86023129549=vBVEe26hWt8TJq8ZJf3AzwuVwlaoMSeaXG16DCdU3Sc%3D= >0 > >Although it seems to redirect now, so I’m not so sure... > >> On Sep 28, 2017, at 11:22 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>wrote: >> >&

Re: Working on 'build.xml' in 'royale-asjs'

I'm using GitHub. Are there GitBox URLs? -Alex On 9/28/17, 12:49 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >Alex, > >Is your origin Gitbox or Github? Maybe switching your origin will help? > >> On Sep 28, 2017, at 6:21 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

OK, I registered. On 9/28/17, 11:59 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: >Would you mind to register and I will give you Admin rights. > >Piotr > >2017-09-28 20:57 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> Hmm. Can yo

Re: FALCON_HOME and FALCONJX_HOME

install, and will >change/add code and documentation I find missing. > >EdB > > > >On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> OK, I have "ant all" working in royale-asjs and tried to describe how to >> se

Re: Nightly Builds Available

f%7Cfa7b1b >5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636423552028633728=XEiWErWJcW5l >hlgnX5asnWJI4Dna9zqwTRQAsipmmEM%3D=0 > >Piotr > >2017-09-30 9:40 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> I have the Ant builds complet

Nightly Builds Available

Hi Folks, I have the Ant builds completing successfully on my CI server. What is different about the output for Royale is that we are experimenting with different packaging so we don't need to use the Apache Flex SDK Installer, which was having problems with large Adobe AIR SDKs. There are two

Re: Struggling with resource files

ources get >auto-included in the main JS? > >BTW, if there’s something I can do to help you with the packaging branch, >please let me know. > >Harbs > >> On Oct 2, 2017, at 2:28 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> >> >&

Re: Github wikis

I think I learned that Github Pages is not per-repo, it is one per Apache Project. It is a bit easier to have one repo per release product. Combining repos for a release is a bit of extra work. There should be examples in the IDE-friendly artifact. IMO, TourJS would have its own release

Re: [DISCUSS] project vs. product name vs artifact names

I changed the subject so sorry if this appears like a new thread. Let's be a bit more explicit and see if that helps. After getting the packaging to start to work, I've changed my thoughts a bit. I actually think I agree with Carlos and Erik. I am proposing that we post two different

Re: Struggling with resource files

uld work in >Royale (in JS). If we could get that working, it would be huge. > >Harbs > >> On Oct 2, 2017, at 9:57 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> See the Adobe docs: [1][2] >> >> I think the functionality you are looki

[FLEXJS][ROYALE] Github Issues replacing Apache JIRA

Hi, It looks like GitHub Issues has been enabled on the new Royale repos. The Royale folks will no longer be watching Apache JIRA for issues related to FlexJS and Royale. Existing FlexJS JIRA issues will not be automatically migrated to GitHub Issues. If you have an open FlexJS issue in Apache

Re: [Help] Need help with nabble setup

It is working on users@ as well. -Alex On 9/29/17, 7:57 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >OK. I found that it wasn't config'd for ezmlm, so I set that and >re-subscribed. > >I'll send another test email and if that doesn't work, wait until tomo

Re: Failed build doing 'ant all' on the packaging branch

Hi Piotr, Last night, I got Maven to build the three Royale repos locally. You can probably just try changing the repos used by the Maven builds on builds.a.o. Or I will do that after I get the Ant build to pass. That should produce the same artifacts (under org.apache.flex). I'd like to

Re: Failed build doing 'ant all' on the packaging branch

pose a while ago. > >Piotr > >On Fri, Sep 29, 2017, 20:31 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > >> Hi Piotr, >> >> Last night, I got Maven to build the three Royale repos locally. You >>can >> probably just try changing the repos

Re: Failed build doing 'ant all' on the packaging branch

someone have knowledge >whether we can create new project on build.a.o without ask for some >permission - let me know. > >I could create new build under Flex project but rather it's not the path >which we should go. > >Piotr > >2017-09-29 22:52 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha..

Re: Nightly Builds Available

ce #number) - we will have everything under our created issue. It >help a lot with reviewing. I have found that is much worse for me looking >into the emails than on github right now. > >Thanks, >Piotr > > >2017-10-03 7:25 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: &

Re: Nightly Builds Available

50a75637d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636426421653121832& >sdata=EbeZSf5rIgdMahYddSbaihUPLb59eM18FpGN6rjePTU%3D=0> > >> On Oct 3, 2017, at 6:20 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> I"m not sure what you mean by "use issue num

Re: Flex2Royale

Doesn't "put -r" work? See [1]. I think the key is to use mkdir to make the destination folder on the server before using put. HTH, -Alex [1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10084941/how-can-i-upload-an-entire-fol der-that-contains-other-folders-using-sftp-on-li On 10/9/17, 1:55 PM,

Re: [Maven|Royale] Pipeline for feature/rename branch

in the rewritten tests. It also appears that some tests may still be using the regular Flex SDK. I think those tests should either be rewritten or moved to a profile. Thoughts? -Alex On 10/8/17, 9:03 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >Hi Piotr, > >Yes,

Re: Struggling with resource files

LAv >>A%3D=0> >> >>[2]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdevel >>oper.mozilla.org%2Fen-US%2Fdocs%2FWeb%2FAPI%2FIndexedDB_API=02%7C01% >>7C%7C8c02d7b750644119fab308d50ab22ce3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1% >>7C0%7C0%7C63642668274278

Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)

m%2Fok-at-github%2Fflexjs-docs%2Fwiki=02%7C01%7C%7C1cc23b20500f41e8c7 >6b08d50ad3a65c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63642682650311 >3618=ZKmxBa7gPxIxZof0c4MlzOZktzXDmyj6bgEJmN%2FA0%2BE%3D=0 > >Thanks, >Piotr > >2017-10-03 23:57 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@

Re: Github Pages (was Re: Github wikis)

q3N8arcYV1reW1uDWlVQ%3D >rved=0 > >Thanks, >Om > >On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> Not sure. I notified infra per their instructions. >> >> Get Outlook for >>Android<https:

Re: Initial Board Report

it today if necessary. >>> >>> If folks would like more discussion I can file it on Friday or Sunday, >>>but >>> there shouldn’t be much to report. Hopefully the next report should be >>>full >>> of good content. :-) >>> >>> Harbs &g

Re: [Maven|Royale] Pipeline for feature/rename branch

2Frename%2F8%2F >ata=02%7C01%7C%7Cb9589e8635de48594d5908d511b65d86%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2 >c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636434397302107671=1VzFt4JuJxjw9RgkSiHIYkG3vJ7a >Emjw2wMHLOSTPE4%3D=0 > >Piotr > > > > > > > >2017-10-11 1:06 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.co

Re: Maven build broken

a runnable example then the Integration Test is going to fail. -Alex On 10/19/17, 12:14 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >Just trying to understand what actually is doing that test. :) > >Piotr > >2017-10-19 9:07 GMT+02:00

Re: Maven build broken

confused, because setting the config to “node” works for me in >node targets. > >What’s JSNode used for? > >Harbs > >> On Oct 19, 2017, at 2:13 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>wrote: >> >> The change I made was to add a second Maven buil

Re: Maven build broken

to skip the tests. I'm out of time for at least four hours, so hopefully it will work or you can pick it up from there. HTH, -Alex On 10/18/17, 4:06 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >I just made a change to the maven configuration. Let's see if it works. &

Re: [Royale/Examples] Unable to Build DataBindingExample

I just tried it and didn't even get as far as Peter did. I pushed a change that got DataBindingExample to compile and run. Hopefully Peter's problem is related (looking in an old flex-config.xml) -Alex On 10/19/17, 11:34 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I have not tried today, but

Re: [Website] Getting content ready to publish

Hi Carlos, Looks good as always. Thank you so much for doing this. I want to remind you of this document [1]. IMO, if the top banner is consistent between the home page and other pages, that might be where we have to hang the required links to License, Sponsorship/Donate, Thanks, Security, and

Re: Publishing royale to npm

of this things is not critical, and can be part of the way >each >one see development, but want to explain this so people could fully >understand the goods of maven. > > > > > >2017-11-15 17:27 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> Harbs, >>

Re: About Semantic UI and our UI Set + look-and-feel effort

...@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >2017-11-14 18:26 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> Hi Carlos, >> >> You and others are definitely welcome to integrate SemanticUI like you >>did >> for Mat

Re: [royale-asjs] branch develop updated: Add ‘glue’ utility script to allow WASM to be loaded in HTML

It is great to see progress on this front. Logistical question: We are hoping to cut a release of Royale "soon". Is this code intended to ship in that release? Are we ready to draw attention to the WebASM effort in the release? Otherwise, can this stuff be in a feature branch so we don't have

Re: Publishing royale to npm

ework is in place, in case >of Maven during release process three repositories will land as staging >artifacts and we can vote. > >Thoughts ? >Piotr > > >2017-11-15 8:09 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: > >> Royale will be using artifacts from royale

Re: Publishing royale to npm

...@gmail.com> wrote: >I'm in the middle of updating the npm scripts. Are we planning to >continue >to download flex-falcon from the current release? Or are we planning on >pushing out a new release of falcon/royale-compiler? > >Thanks, >Om > >On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 12:

Re: How to improve the Royale developer experience ("Smart HTML" component set)

Hi Olaf, Welcome back. Can you elaborate on how Royale MXML is different from Flex MXML? Is it just the component and attribute names? Or something else? When you first learned Flex, you didn't know Flex MXML and somehow still found it easy to use. Regarding re-use of HTML/CSS snippets, I'm

Re: How to improve the Royale developer experience ("Smart HTML" component set)

Hi Olaf, Your MXML example is mostly possible with Royale today. In the HTML.swc are thin wrappers for most of the HTMLElements. I see there is a Td component, but there isn't a Table or Tr component. Maybe you can create them, and then it would be interesting to see if there are other bugs or

Re: Outputting valid/efficient CSS

I would prefer not to add a CSS validator to the application compilation time. I don't think it would catch enough stuff often enough. We should check for invalid css usage as part of the build by running a command-line tool, but I would do it in a way that committers don't have to install that

Re: How to improve the Royale developer experience ("Smart HTML" component set)

Hi Olaf, As you try out various beads, you are doing the Royale form of snippet-pasting. In the future, if we add more metadata, we might even be able to tell you if a bead is compatible or not. That is unlikely to happen for folks pasting snippets into their HTML editor. But you if you are

Re: How to improve the Royale developer experience ("Smart HTML" component set)

On 11/24/17, 1:54 AM, "Olaf Krueger" wrote: > >> A DataGrid, IMO, is not a Table. > >I agree, but for simple things, I think a table is good enough. Yes, a Table is good enough, but a Royale version of a Table optimized for columnar display of data should always be more

Re: MXML attributes, minification, and initialization

Interesting. What is the generated data structure for that property? How does the generated data structure differ if the property is getter/setter? Thanks, -Alex On 12/4/17, 3:30 AM, "Yishay Weiss" wrote: >We ran into an interesting problem with minification. If you

Repos and Releases

Hi, The CI servers are reporting that the feature/rename branch is building and passing tests. Theoretically, this means that there is a way to build the compiler, typedefs and framework without any Adobe code (Flash playerglobal.swc or AIR SDK), and without a Flex SDK. I think we need some

Re: Testing npm deployment

Om, One thing I'm confused about: When I read about NPM publishing [1], it sounds like you can publish a folder of stuff (and/or a gzip of that folder) and thus the binaries shouldn't need to be downloaded off of one of our servers. But it looks like the old FlexJS script and now these scripts

Re: Duplicated TextNode in HTML module

In FB, ContainerBase only shows up once in AS code completion and not in MXML (since it isn't in a manifest). HTH, -Alex On 12/16/17, 9:56 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote: >Anyone who use Flash Builder seeing also duplication ? > >Thanks, Piotr > >2017-12-16 18:47

Re: Testing npm deployment

/17, 11:42 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> Om, >> >> One thing I'm confused ab

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

t the apache-royale npm package first. Let's test this out and >figure out the next steps for the one with swf version. > >Would it be better to call it apache-royale-with-air instead of >apache-royale-with-swf? > >Thanks, >Om > >On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Alex

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

On 12/17/17, 10:26 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Dec 17, 2017 9:44 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > >Why "Air" and not "SW

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

il.com> wrote: >I think it would be good if we do: apache-royale-x.x.x and >apache-royale-with-swf-x.x.x. >That makes it much clearer. > >Thanks, >Om > >On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> OK, I think I got

Re: Repos and Releases

, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >On 12/12/17, 7:20 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Ok, I guess I was missing some context. Piotr’s upthread [1] link made it >>clear to me what the topic was about… >> >>

Re: Repos and Releases

; > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven >>with >> > the >> > > *-e* switch. >> > > >> > > [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug >> > logging. >> > > >> > >

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

The package on the CI server aren't working with NPM. I think I messed up the Ant script. Looking into it now. -Alex On 12/12/17, 10:10 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Dec 12, 2017 8

Re: Repos and Releases

10=rgtHk9T02d4%2BqFNjRiomfNph0KAZFmPv0bkFdl7P7xw%3D=0 >[4] >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa >che.org%2Fmb8f=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf4463649f2fe48c9b0b708d >54173ee6d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636486888529206710& >sdata=7zxTC0iyY

Re: Repos and Releases

Ww6 >>iLNDcR0Pk%2BcHaQ%3D=0) -> >> > *[Help >> > > > 2]* >> > > > >> > > > [*ERROR*] >> > > > >> > > > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven >> with >> > > the >&

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

only. I still think it might be valuable to have 'flexjs' in the package name for the package with SWF support. Thoughts? -Alex On 12/12/17, 10:18 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >The package on the CI server aren't working with NPM. I think I messed u

Re: MXML attributes, minification, and initialization

ps%3A%2F%2Fgithub.co >m%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-compiler%2Fissues%2F2758=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adob >e.com%7Ce6f11c8e2fbf4bc51b0908d542f1c916%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee >1%7C0%7C0%7C636488528580236240=MQEbe24K7DTVWctRLpIOqxxnzaLc%2BwIWZnf >ytpawgO4%3D=0 > > > > >Fro

Re: Repos and Releases

I found this article [1]. Most of our launch scripts are already using Ant, so Ant might be part of the solution. Ignoring the answers that hardcode a path, the others use some interesting techniques that may or may not work for us. For example, one answer uses Ant's

Re: Testing npm deployment

tem. But I'm an NPM newbie, so I may be missing something. -Alex [2] https://docs.npmjs.com/how-npm-works/packages On 12/18/17, 1:14 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, De

Re: Duplicated TextNode in HTML module

o be Royale... > >I have very little knowledge about language server from Josh, although I'm >following each change which is being committed there, that is why I'm not >sure whether this "tolerance" is easy to achieve. > >Thanks, Piotr > > >2017-12-18 23:35 GM

Re: Testing npm deployment

Royale (JSOnly) has no extra downloads. Royale-swf needs the non-open stuff (AIR, Flash, Flat). On 12/18/17, 12:20 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:41

Re: Testing npm deployment

ror. Where will mirror url resolution take >place? > >How are you planning to support this in your approach? > >Thanks, >Om > > >On Dec 18, 2017 8:45 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > >Hi Om, > >My logic is that package.json goe

Re: Testing npm deployment

far as npm >goes? > >How can I help? > >I will leave my branch as is in case we decide to go that route at a later >point of time. > >Thanks, >Om > >On Dec 18, 2017 10:04 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > >> That is the qu

Re: internal types in subclasses

Not sure. Is this sort of thing legal in pure AS3? -Alex On 12/18/17, 7:55 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >I have a class which has an internal class for an Object definition: > >class DrawRecord{ > public var rect:Rectangle; > public var color:uint; > public var

Re: Repos and Releases

;7c5108d542cd8127%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636488372770 >026928=Ckxw9je0r40nLKraeQx1lRxhS3QIuh7E1elFSYGCmbM%3D=0 > >From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:10 AM >To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >Subject: Re: Rep

Re: Repos and Releases

i%40adobe.com%7Cc073d5244c3a4a8c4c7008d >542c7c765%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636488348179522554& >sdata=alK66W8KLnCFp9bskeMoSRfTY%2B%2B5Wm0txR7%2FmToEm2c%3D=0 > >From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 9:54 PM &

Re: Repos and Releases

amp; >sdata=alK66W8KLnCFp9bskeMoSRfTY%2B%2B5Wm0txR7%2FmToEm2c%3D=0 > >From: Alex Harui<mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 9:54 PM >To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> >Subject: Re: Repos and Releases >

Re: Dropdowns

-debug%2Findex.html=02 >%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5b3cb74c7d344ab20afd08d5426daf38%7Cfa7b1b5a7b >34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636487961223884189=euNEiQPN03x5%2FQ >3ToNZOu5B9XWMLya48yxZfTNXv2Aw%3D=0 > >2017-12-13 21:36 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: &g

Re: NPM for Royale (was Re: Repos and Releases)

l.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> FWIW, we also have the option of making the SWF support more of an >> "add

Re: Ant Build Problem

>EdB > > > >On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >wrote: > >> I get an error dialog from the swf being tested, "VerifyError: Error >> #1014: Class IResponder could not be found.". When I dismiss the dialog, >> test test time

Re: Ant Build Problem

ache-flex-flexunit-4.2.0-4.12.0-bin.zip" is downloaded and unzipped to >the 'royale-asjs/in' directory. I have no other FlexUnit on my system. > >EdB > > > >On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> Erik, >> &

Re: internal types in subclasses

an’t think of a way. Hence my question… ;-) > >> On Dec 18, 2017, at 8:19 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>wrote: >> >> Not sure. Is this sort of thing legal in pure AS3? >> >> -Alex >> >> On 12/18/17, 7:55 AM, "Harbs"

Re: Ant Build Problem

, cleaning my changes and checking out from >>>git the >>> unit tests aren’t being run anymore and so I’m not getting it. I’ll >>>come >>> back to it when it starts itching again, but for now I can work. >>> >>> >>> >>> >

Re: About code-assist in FlashBuilder

Hi Nicolas, I had to get finish up the compiler refactor before debugging further into this. Turns out that "goto definition" requires source attachments and source attachments are special-cased by FB for the existing Flex SWC names. I'd been told that was the case and finally found the source

Re: Dropdowns

I am not understanding something. The Basic DropDownList just wraps a . That's all it should do. I thought knew how to show what is selected? Anything else can be added via PAYG principles, including DropDowns that have custom item renderers. My 2 cents, -Alex On 12/13/17, 11:20 AM, "Harbs"

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >