Re: [Discuss] ARM CI for Storm

dd more complex test cases on aarch64, like unit tests > and > > > > > functional tests, step by step. It's a log term works. > > > > > > > > > > Of course, welcome another developers join to maintain the aarch64 > > CI, > > >

Re: [Discuss] ARM CI for Storm

t; > > Yikun > > > > -------- > > > > Jiang Yikun（Kero） > > > > Mail: yikunk...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > Stig Rohde Døssing 于2019年6月21日周五 上午2:23写道： > > > > > > &g

Re: [Discuss] ARM CI for Storm

. volunteer to maintain the compatibility part. Otherwise -1 here. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 7:27 PM Stig Rohde Døssing wrote: > Hi, > > An issue was opened suggesting adding ARM CI to the Storm build, using > OpenLab https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.3 (rc2)

;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd > > > > > > The Nexus staging repository for this release is: > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1081 > > > > > > Please vote on releas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.3 (rc2)

(local) : OK - run RollingTopWords (remote) : OK - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) : OK - change log level : OK - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK - log search : OK Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 1:2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC7

(local) : OK - run RollingTopWords (remote) : OK - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) : OK - change log level : OK - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK - log search : OK Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 4

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 RC5

According to how other projects are doing right now, looks like we are not doing. https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/NOTICE-binary https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/LICENSE-binary https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/trunk/LICENSE If I understand correct, aether in

Re: Storm 2.0 blogs ?

y some of dependencies which are known to be troublesome for version conflict. I guess it's worth to mention in release announcement too. https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/8a475696e908c53f1c06bf1a8f373d8ac0483427/shaded-deps/pom.xml#L36-L158 - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2019년 1월 23일 (수) 오전 4:39

Re: [NOTICE] Migration of storm repos to gitbox is done

Thanks for the effort, Ethan! Just a reminder for all committers: If my understanding is right, now all committers should set up your account into ASF Gitbox to be registered as storm team and be able to get write access. I'm seeing only subset of members in storm committer now. 2019년 1월 21일 (월)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.4 (rc1)

(local) : OK - run RollingTopWords (remote) : OK - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) : OK - change log level : OK - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK - log search : OK Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2019년 1월 10일 (목) 오전 8:06, Et

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.3 (rc1)

(local) : OK - run RollingTopWords (remote) : - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) : OK - change log level : OK - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK - log search : OK Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2019년 1월 15일 (화) 오후 4:55, Ale

Re: [VOTE] Migration of git repos to gitbox.apache.org

Thanks Ethan for leading the effort on migration! +1 from me. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2019년 1월 19일 (토) 오전 4:48, Govind Menon 님이 작성: > +1 > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 13:33, Stig Rohde Døssing > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Den fre. 18. jan. 2019

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc4)

perf. degrade is a blocker for this release, since we are still providing far better performance then 1.x. As Roshan is planning to address this, that could be fixed in 2.0.x hopefully. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (heartSaVioR) 2019년 1월 19일 (토) 오전 5:23, Roshan Naik 님이 작성: > Was verifying the p

Re: New Storm Committer and PMC Member

Congrats Govind! Keep up the good work. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2019년 1월 10일 (목) 오전 11:47, Xin Wang 님이 작성: > Congrats Govind! > > -Xin > > Arun Mahadevan 于2019年1月10日周四 上午3:23写道： > > > Congratulations Govind, keep up the good work. > > > > - Arun

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc2)

restart worker : OK - log search :OK Note that "profiling worker" and "topology log search" works now which were failing in RC1. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 10월 11일 (목) 오전 3:02, Stig Rohde Døssing 님이 작성: > +1 > > Built and ran unit tests from the t

Re: Cleaning Up Old Pull Requests STORM-3250

+1 It doesn't look like there're any critical PRs in the list, and it is pretty less chance we could connect with PR authors. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 10월 9일 (화) 오전 5:08, Kishorkumar Patil 님이 작성: > +1. > It would be nice to clean up old clutter while we are getting ready for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1)

Just filed STORM-3238 [1] for topology log search error, and STORM-3239 [2] for worker profile. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3238 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3239 2018년 9월 28일 (금) 오전 12:13, Govind Menon 님이 작성: > I have a

Re: [GitHub] storm issue #1136: [STORM-1565] Multi-Lang Performance Improvements

s. Someone might be concerned, but I think that's the way we need to go. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 9월 27일 (목) 오전 8:53, P. Taylor Goetz 님이 작성: > Andrew, > > Thanks for bringing the private conversation back to the dev@ list so > everyone has more context. > > That being

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1)

easy to reproduce for someone as well. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 9월 26일 (수) 오후 9:02, Kishorkumar Patil 님이 작성: > I have patch up for WorkerToken Auto renewal fix. I think this should be > added to 2.x RC. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3235 > https://github.c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc1)

t work) - log search : topology search doesn't work, deep search work No +1 here but once we fix the worker profile as well as topology log search I would be +1 for next RC. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 9월 22일 (토) 오전 5:34, Bobby Evans 님이 작성: > +1 I rebuilt the code from the git ta

Re: Regarding releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0

; > > > > release, and I really would like to see it happen before > another > >> > > month > >> > > > > > passes. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > We have a 2.0 based deploy i

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove Ganglia metrics reporter

For Storm 2.0 I'm OK to drop supporting Ganglia reporter as same as why we removed storm-druid in Storm 2.0. When we drop supporting Ganglia reporter in 1.x it would be backward incompatible. We just introduced Metrics V2 in Storm 1.2 and I guess few people use Ganglia reporter, so I feel even OK

Re: Regarding releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0

much time on releasing Storm 2.0.0. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1311 2. https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2752 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2947 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-3156 2018년 7월 11일 (수) 오전 5:12

Regarding releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0

folks to concentrate on remaining tasks for Storm 2.0.0 till we announce release. WDYT? Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

Re: Requesting review for a couple of PRs

Stig, I started reviewing your pull requests. There would be conflicts between 1.x-branch as well as conflicts between pull requests, so please follow up some following-up requests if any. Btw I'll rebase STORM-2406 to make it getting review again. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 7월

Re: Requesting review for a couple of PRs

ira/browse/STORM-2953> I'd like to ask you to also add them here, so we can resolve the one which is effectively blocker for Storm 2.0. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 7월 6일 (금) 오후 9:08, Stig Rohde Døssing 님이 작성: > Hi devs, > > There are a couple of PRs open for changes in sto

Re: Powered-By Storm: Southcom - Mezzo fluid mediation

Hi Paolo, sorry for the late. Stig helps to add your company to the powered-by page via https://github.com/apache/storm-site/pull/6 The page is now updated: http://storm.apache.org/Powered-By.html Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 6월 16일 (토) 오전 1:40, Paolo Galeotti 님이 작성: > Nat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.2 (rc3)

REMINDER: The vote has been opened from 6 days ago, and still has only two binding +1s. Please verify the release candidate and vote. 2018년 5월 21일 (월) 오후 11:16, Julien Nioche 님이 작성: > +1 non binding > > compiled + ran StormCrawler topology without problems > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.3 (rc2)

REMINDER: The vote has been opened from 5 days ago, and still has only one binding +1s. Please verify the release candidate and vote. 2018년 5월 19일 (토) 오전 10:49, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > This release candidate contains md5/sha for src archives, unlike 1.2.2 > RC

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.3 (rc2)

- ran RollingTopWords The difference between rc1 and rc2 is regarding storm-kafka-client patch, so skipped checking storm-core features. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 5월 19일 (토) 오전 4:39, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache St

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.2 (rc3)

- spinning single cluster from binary dist succeeded - ran RollingTopWords and verified STORM-2988[1] and STORM-3069[2] runs well which are added between rc2 and rc3 Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2988 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.3 (rc1)

- run RollingTopWords (local) : OK - run RollingTopWords (remote) : OK - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) : OK - change log level : OK - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK - log search : OK Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 5월

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.2 (rc2)

, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > +1 (binding) > > > source > > - verify file (signature, MD5, SHA) > -- source, tar.gz : OK > -- source, zip : OK > > - extract file > -- source, tar.gz : OK > -- source, zip : OK > > - diff-ing extracted file

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.2 (rc2)

to go ahead on release, but I'm also OK to resolve STORM-3059 quickly and roll out RC3. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 5월 6일 (일) 오후 8:35, Stig Rohde Døssing <stigdoess...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Alexandre, > > Could you try running just > > mvn clean install -DskipTests

Re: New Committer/PMC Member: Ethan Li

Congratulations! Welcome Ethan! On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 7:30 AM Stig Rohde Døssing wrote: > Congratulations > > 2018-04-16 21:16 GMT+02:00 Erik Weathers : > > > congrats Ethan! > > > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:51 AM, P. Taylor Goetz

Re: New Committer/PMC Member: Roshan Naik

Congrats Roshan! 2018년 4월 6일 (금) 오전 11:39, P. Taylor Goetz 님이 작성: > Please join me in congratulating and welcoming Roshan Naik as the latest > Apache Storm committer and PMC member. > > Welcome Roshan! > > -Taylor > >

Re: New Metrics Reporting API - for 2.0.0

Aaron, please feel free to take up STORM-2908 and STORM-2909 as well. I'd be much appreciated. I asked Taylor to take them up but didn't work. They're coupled with Storm 2.0.0 release so sooner is better, but no hard due date for now. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 3월 14일 (수) 오전 12:35, Aaron

Re: Regarding "Powered By"

. If you would want to add your company to the list of "Powered By", you could edit the page in below repository and submit a pull request. https://github.com/apache/storm-site Thanks again! Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 3월 1일 (목) 오전 12:06, Harsh Choudhary <ha...@crispanalyt

Re: Building history of storm worker assignments

worker is successfully launched. If there's some cases which worker continuously fails to launch, the assignment will not be recorded. Please note that shutdown is not guaranteed to be called. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 28일 (수) 오전 3:37, Nikhil Bafna <nikhil.bafn...@gmail.com>

Re: New Committer/PMC Member: Erik Weathers

Welcome Erik! Congrats! -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 23일 (금) 오전 7:05, Stig Rohde Døssing <stigdoess...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Congratulations Erik. Happy to see you join. > > 2018-02-22 20:53 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Vermeerbergen < > avermeerber...@gmail.com > >

[DISCUSS] Handling dependencies for Storm 2.0.0 (STORM-2882)

voices regarding two questions, and idea/knowledge of how. Thanks in advance. Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 1. https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-storm-dev/201703.mbox/%3ccaf5108gjjqzsyywcp99bgpgec7tufe-tbt9fi0m78ah8rkm...@mail.gmail.com%3E 2. https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded

Re: [DISCUSS] Plan on Storm 2.0.0

Anyway, I'll initiate some discussion threads for current issues targeted to Storm 2.0.0. Sorry in prior to bulk of discussions. 2018년 2월 20일 (화) 오전 11:25, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > I think that's good idea. "blockers" should have priority as blocker

Re: Verification about my observation for current State implementation

can be (and should be) changed, and we should support state resharding in this case. Without resharding each task fails to load all the KVs for keys routing to the task. It doesn't seem to the issue about whether supporting dynamic task change or not. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) ps. btw, inter

Re: Verification about my observation for current State implementation

vided "state reshard" feature for a long time which makes actual users directly suffer, so that's another major feature to me. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 1. http://storm.apache.org/releases/1.2.1/Command-line-client.html 2018년 2월 21일 (수) 오전 4:22, Arun Iyer <ai...@hortonworks.com&g

Re: [DISCUSS] Plan on Storm 2.0.0

월 20일 (화) 오전 9:49, Roshan Naik <ros...@hortonworks.com>님이 작성: > Would be good to callout which of issues listed in Storm 2.0 epic are > considered “blockers” vs “very desirable” vs “good to have” > > -roshan > > > On 2/19/18, 3:29 PM, "Jungtaek Lim" <kabh..

Verification about my observation for current State implementation

in advance, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

[DISCUSS] Plan on Storm 2.0.0

nd discuss. Please add your voice on anything about Storm 2.0.0 plan. It would be much appreciated if someone puts efforts on testing and stabilizing the current master branch (it would take much time and efforts and more hands are definitely better). Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

Re: [DISCUSS] consider EOL for version lines

t to add a more explicit statement to the download page, we can > certainly do that as well. > > -Taylor > > [1] http://storm.apache.org/downloads.html > > > On Feb 13, 2018, at 4:45 PM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > We're in discussion to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.1 (rc1)

+1 (binding) * verified src/bin with targz/zip archives * checked the diff between extracted targz/zip (no difference) * oncrpc.jar is not included in binary distribution Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 17일 (토) 오전 10:07, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Thank y

Re: [DISCUSS] consider EOL for version lines

as earlier version of Storm 2.x (ideally 2.0.0 but it is just an ideal view). Anyway, looks like there is no objection to announce 0.10.x/0.9.x explicitly EOL. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 14일 (수) 오전 6:02, Erik Weathers <eweath...@groupon.com.invalid>님이 작성: > Thanks for keeping

Re: [DISCUSS] [Storm-Kafka] - Maintenance, Branch Support, and Deprecation Plans for storm-kafka and storm-kaka-client

, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2017년 7월 20일 (목) 오전 5:10, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > +1 I’m fine with taking this approach. > > -Taylor > > > On Jul 19, 2017, at 2:04 PM, Stig Rohde Døssing <stigdoess...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 f

[DISCUSS] consider EOL for version lines

announce EOL to 0.x version lines and get rid of any supports (downloads) for them. Would like to hear your opinion. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.6 (rc3)

change log level : OK - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK - log search : OK Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 9일 (금) 오후 6:18, Erik Weathers <eweath...@groupon.com.invalid>님이 작성: > I'm fine submitting a PR to back that line out (or any of you committer > folks cou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc3)

l : OK - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK - log search : OK Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 9일 (금) 오전 5:59, Bobby Evans <ev...@oath.com.invalid>님이 작성: > +1 I built from the tag and did some basic tests on a single node cluster. > > I am disappointed that it took

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.6 (rc3)

I'm not 100% sure either, but I assume Storm serializes topology information into thrift structure (at least Grouping.fields() takes List instead of Fields), so unless nodes are using different versions of Storm (which we never support), that would be safe. If it's not safe, we already broke

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

Update: I also merged the patch for 1.0.x-branch. Thanks all for taking valuable efforts and time to participate this topic and making it possible so quickly. Now release phase of both 1.1.2 and 1.0.6 can be restart. 2018년 2월 8일 (목) 오전 6:30, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc4)

exist in toollib directory. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 8일 (목) 오전 7:24, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc4) > > Note that the only difference between rc4 and rc3 is the fix for > https://issues.apac

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

.0 RC. > > > > -Taylor > > > > > On Feb 5, 2018, at 10:46 PM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > UPDATE: Submitted a pull request https://github.com/apache/ > > storm/pull/2549 for > > > STORM-2936 (against 1.1.x-br

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc3)

Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2943 for storm-kafka-monitor src/javadoc inclusion issue and assigned to Taylor. 2018년 2월 8일 (목) 오전 5:32, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Thanks for addressing md5/sha issue, Taylor. Verified src.tar.gz and > src.zip. &

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc3)

in point of user side, worth to cancel current RC. Changing my vote to -1 (binding). -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 8일 (목) 오전 5:20, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Yes. It will be fixed. Thanks again for pointing it out. > > -Taylor > > > On Feb 7, 201

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc3)

CORRECTION: didn't check md5/sha from source targz/zip since the files are not presented. Will check again once they are available. 2018년 2월 7일 (수) 오후 10:49, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > +1 (binding) > > > source > > - verify file (signature, MD5, SHA)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc3)

912 [2] are confirmed to be resolved in verification phase. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2853 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2912 2018년 2월 7일 (수) 오후 9:39, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Looks like missing md5/sha for apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc3)

Looks like missing md5/sha for apache-storm-1.2.0-src.tar.gz as well as apache-storm-1.2.0-src.zip. I'll continue verifying without that. 2018년 2월 7일 (수) 오전 6:01, P. Taylor Goetz 님이 작성: > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc3) > > Full list of changes in

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

) 오전 10:39, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Thanks for quick response Erik! > > Just filed two issues : > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2936 (for 1.1.x-branch) > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2937 (for 1.0.x-branch) > > We have another

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

ike needed to postpone it. Would like to here everyone's voice on this. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 6일 (화) 오전 10:23, Erik Weathers <eweath...@groupon.com.invalid>님이 작성: > Thanks for the quick response Jungtaek! > > Yes, my teammates and myself would like to help on this

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

release candidate, we should get it ASAP. That's why I'm eager to go ahead making the change. If you could spend time now helping with making the change ASAP, please leave short notice (maybe with JIRA issue?) and go ahead. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 6일 (화) 오전 9:41, Erik Weathers

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc2)

the alternative: deprecation of 1.0.x-branch in other thread [1]. Please voice your opinion regarding this. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVIoR) 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3a1ac1f1c396723d9ff9effaf8ee839e0ada5df3a88bee9df0d4602c@%3Cdev.storm.apache.org%3E 2018년 2월 6일 (화) 오전 7:02, Stig Rohde

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 6일 (화) 오전 7:53, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > OK. No more opinion/vote in 5 days. I'll treat consensus was made, and go > ahead making change: overwrite storm-kafka-client 1.2.0 to two branches > 1.1.x/1.0.x. > > -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVio

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

OK. No more opinion/vote in 5 days. I'll treat consensus was made, and go ahead making change: overwrite storm-kafka-client 1.2.0 to two branches 1.1.x/1.0.x. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 1일 (목) 오전 10:48, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > This discussion got 4 +1

Re: Storm multilang - .net core

CORRECTION: I don't work on multilang for now. "had some works" on multilang and introduced small changes on multilang protocol. 2018년 2월 2일 (금) 오전 9:12, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Please remove or bcc. for company mail/mailing list which don't allow > send

Re: Storm multilang - .net core

Please remove or bcc. for company mail/mailing list which don't allow sending mail outside of MS. My previous mail bounced. I just removed CCC from recipient in current mail. 2018년 2월 2일 (금) 오전 9:08, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Mauro, > > First of all, thank

Re: Storm multilang - .net core

gain for crafting .net adapter and proposing for donation. Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 2일 (금) 오전 2:03, Mauro Giusti <mau...@microsoft.com.invalid>님이 작성: > Hello Storm devs - > > We are working on a project that uses Storm and C# / .net core components. > > As par

Re: Build failures on all 1.x version lines

s, I’ve been using the following JDK: > > java version "1.8.0_152" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_152-b16) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.152-b16, mixed mode) > > -Taylor > > > On Feb 1, 2018, at 6:31 AM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh.

Re: Build failures on all 1.x version lines

Another update: I've tracked first page of pull requests and filed build failure issues under STORM-915. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-915 2018년 2월 1일 (목) 오후 6:29, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > UPDATE: I've run build 3 times per branch from Travis CI, whic

Re: Build failures on all 1.x version lines

manual test as well) but the test failures still need to be investigated since we don't have any plan to drop supporting 1.x version lines. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 1일 (목) 오후 3:13, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Hi devs, > > I have been verifying rel

Build failures on all 1.x version lines

/335962725 1.0.x : https://travis-ci.org/HeartSaVioR/storm/builds/335962792 Please try out building branches with JDK7/8 (multiple times would be really appreciated) and share whether the build passes smoothly or not. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

topics: separating storm-kafka-client as independent release cycle, and this. I guess some of us agreed former topic doesn't related to current RC, but I think this topic can be (should be) reflected to current RC ongoing. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 2월 1일 (목) 오전 4:08, Hugo Da Cruz Louro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc2)

. If not, looks like someone including me need to investigate the issue. Switching JDK helps so really odd though. 2018년 2월 1일 (목) 오전 3:47, Stig Rohde Døssing <stigdoess...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > I meant 1.1.2 RC. > > 2018-01-31 9:44 GMT+01:00 Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>: > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc2)

ppreciated. Stig, did you encounter this? And if you encountered, did you submit a patch for this? Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 30일 (화) 오전 4:45, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > I’m open to synching storm-kafka-client across those releases if that’s > the d

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

Bump up this thread so that we could reach consensus earlier. Given that we got concern related to this, I think it is ideal to release 1.1.x/1.0.x with making decision and applying the change if we want. 2018년 1월 30일 (화) 오전 9:25, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Erik's concer

Re: [DISCUSS] Decouple Storm core and connectors

. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 31일 (수) 오전 10:58, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Hit send on that too soon... > > This is an important discussion topic, but has no effect on the current > RCs. Id recommend focusing on the current releases and come back to th

Re: [DISCUSS] Decouple Storm core and connectors

affect Storm core repository at any case. 2018년 1월 30일 (화) 오후 2:03, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > If we worry about breaking somethings along with our > users/consumers/distributors, picking one of less used/updated connector as > experiment makes more sense to me. It'

Re: [DISCUSS] Decouple Storm core and connectors

a one of them. I've seen many connectors in same, or similar, or possible (say truck number 1) situation. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 30일 (화) 오후 1:30, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > > On Jan 29, 2018, at 8:03 PM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Decouple Storm core and connectors

/blocker issue from them? If not, why we allow to leave the thing which is in main repository as inconsistent state? Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 30일 (화) 오전 6:59, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > > > On Jan 29, 2018, at 3:55 PM, Arun Mahadevan <ar...

Re: [DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

-client in 1.0.x in inconsistent state. IMHO, breaking backward compatibility is worse, but leaving broken thing is worst. Hence I'm +1 to replace all, with noticing that it may bring backward incompatibility in release announce. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 30일 (화) 오전 4:49, P. Taylor Goetz

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc2)

verifying 1.1.2 RC2 and 1.0.6 RC2 if he would want to take only blocker issue for current RCs. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 27일 (토) 오전 6:11, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc2) > > Full list of changes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc2)

waiting patches into 1.x-branch to be included to 1.2.0. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 27일 (토) 오후 6:29, Alexandre Vermeerbergen <avermeerber...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Hello Stig, > > Thank you very much for your answer, I am feeling better now that I > see that the issu

Re: [DISCUSS] Decouple Storm core and connectors

we could select some of connectors to support as first class, and move out others to Bahir or another storm repository (storm-connectors? storm-externals?). - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSavioR) 2018년 1월 29일 (월) 오후 2:30, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Hi devs, > > This

[DISCUSS] Replace storm-kafka-client on 1.1.x-branch / 1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch

topic. You're encouraged to copy your previous post in vote thread which helps to centralize opinions in current thread. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.6 (rc1)

We have two different topics in cancelled vote thread. Let's initiate another threads to continue discussion. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 27일 (토) 오후 11:56, Stig Rohde Døssing <stigdoess...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > I don't think storm-kafka-client needs its own project, but I like

Re: [CANCELED] [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.6 (rc1)

marking as beta is very important in practice and that's why InterfaceStability annotation came in and widely used for big project. (We have started to apply it for streams API in 2.0.0: they're marked as @Unstable.) Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 26일 (금) 오전 4:16, Hugo Da Cruz Louro <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.2

I found blocker issue based on the contributor's report in 1.2.0 RC1, and found the cause. Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2912. Will craft patches for branches shortly. -1 (binding) - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 25일 (목) 오전 2:36, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.6 (rc1)

Btw, I found blocker issue based on the contributor's report in 1.2.0 RC1, and found the cause. Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2912. Will craft patches for branches shortly. -1 (binding) - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 25일 (목) 오후 12:43, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc1)

I found the cause. Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2912. Will craft patches for branches shortly. FYI, this issue affects all the RCs being opened now. I'll comment to other RCs as well. -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 25일 (목) 오후 12:09, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.6 (rc1)

, but it can't be released often because it requires Storm itself to be released which requires huge bootstrap. 2018년 1월 25일 (목) 오후 12:37, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Hi Erik, > > Thanks for bring up issue. Yes you're right that all the patches are going > through

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.0.6 (rc1)

. To. PMCs Makes sense? Need to initiate another discussion thread? Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 25일 (목) 오전 10:48, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Erik, > > Open and honest opinions are always welcome. Even if they may come across > as harsh (and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc1)

be really helpful if you could provide information on your test topology to reproduce, like using multilang, asynchronous bolt, etc. Except metrics, other things are still OK. Anyway, changing my vote to -1 (binding). Thanks, Jungtaek Lim 2018년 1월 25일 (목) 오후 12:02, Priyank Shah <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc1)

estart worker : OK - log search : OK I don't see odd numbers while testing, but I don't have stage/production level of cluster/use case, hence someone might be able to see the behavior what Alexandre encountered. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 24일 (수) 오전 10:19, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc1)

contributors. I think reporting issue itself is great contribution, but I feel we don't have enough code contributors who could help driving the community. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 24일 (수) 오전 9:57, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Yes, that’s the same error I got, an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc1)

but the script is not compatible with python 3. Maybe I need to modify the script to be compatible with python3.6. cc. to Taylor, assuming that we are getting same error. - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) 2018년 1월 24일 (수) 오전 8:21, Stig Rohde Døssing <stigdoess...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > Taylor, > &

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >