Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Hi Alex. New binaires available for vote this week based on all latest binaries and on Mark'work. Thank again Mark. If nothing wrong happens we can expect the Vite being closed the upcoming weekend and get binaries promoted just after. Jlouis Le 11 nov. 2013 20:32, "Alex The Rocker" a écrit : >

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

nal Message - > > From: Alex The Rocker > > To: dev@tomee.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Monday, 11 November 2013, 20:31 > > Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0 > > > > Hello: > > > > Our tests with the TomEE 1.6.0 "plus" pre

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

FYI (unrelated but still). Currently running the 'real' openjpa-2.3.0 release tasks Wish me luck... LieGrue, strub - Original Message - > From: Alex The Rocker > To: dev@tomee.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, 11 November 2013, 20:31 > Subject: Re: Ti

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Hello: Our tests with the TomEE 1.6.0 "plus" preview binaries are successful, both in our manual and automated tests (we do not use any other TomEE or OpenEJB packages). Now our pressure is people asking "when TomEE 1.6.0" will officially be accessible from the TomEE download page. Thanks, Alex.

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Jean-Louis: I noticed it and I already pushed the information in my compagny for our QA & development teams to test ASAP and report any issue. I'll keep you updated Thanks, Alex On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Hey guys, > > Preview binaries are up. Give it a try

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Hey guys, Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please, whatever it is (work or not). All information are available on the other thread. JLouis 2013/11/8 David Blevins > Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due > to shade plugin limita

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded version if it's being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were 5mb bigger due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that make the s

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

your understanding, LieGrue, strub > > From: Alex The Rocker >To: dev@tomee.apache.org; Mark Struberg >Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 12:12 >Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0 > > >Mark: >Thanks, we'll consider that. >

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom. > See OPENJPA-2335 > > I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn. > It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there might > have been a good rea

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

so understand that some users have time constraints. But we > would be even happier if people don't see all the work we do as granted for > free. > > > don't take it personal, just needed to be said ;) > > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

;) LieGrue, strub > > From: Romain Manni-Bucau >To: dev@tomee.apache.org >Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 6:58 >Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0 > > >Ping Mark to know what is the openjpa regression. If blocking wait openjpa >(or do the fix), if not B (or with the

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

>>>>>> this with other things before on rare occasion >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course there is a 3rd option: >>>>>> >>>>>> C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time >>>>>>

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

ther things before on rare occasion > >>>> > >>>> Of course there is a 3rd option: > >>>> > >>>> C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time > >>>> that they'll need a release. > >>>> > >>>> I personally don't f

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

>> I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys >> out >>>> to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get that >>>> frequent release thing down. >>>> >>>> So which option would have you

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

thing down. > > > > > > So which option would have your vote? > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > > > > > openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 depend

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

; > openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much > > sucks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> From: David Blevins > > >> To: dev@

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

v 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much > sucks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> ____ > >> From: David Blevins > >>

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

>> >> From: David Blevins >> To: dev@tomee.apache.org >> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25 >> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0 >> >> >> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much sucks. > > From: David Blevins >To: dev@tomee.apache.org >Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25 >Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0 > > >Branched in hopes we

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Hi David, It doesnt support asm4 + several bugfixes (on auditor, criteria api, dictionnary...) needed by several people. Le 4 nov. 2013 03:25, "David Blevins" a écrit : > Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we > have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or a

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something people can beat on. In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using 2.2.2? -David On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins wrote:

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne. Mark had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we need. Mark, that still something you're up for doing? -David On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > Cool, thanks! > > Will send a mail

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Cool, thanks! Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans. JLouis 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau > FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now (thanks > David for TCK report) > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau * > *Blog: **http://rmanni

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now (thanks David for TCK report) *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau * *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibu

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

I know that almost everybody is currently working in production with SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB). But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real releases. But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated regarding the community. Hopefully, that should be better in c

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Hehe, I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer to be realistic. Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" a écrit : > Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do better and more > frequent releases, at least with bugfixes. > > JLouis > > > 2013/9/4 Romain

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do better and more frequent releases, at least with bugfixes. JLouis 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau > arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't move but we > can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO (we

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't move but we can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO (we just need to ask). However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself ;) so we need it to be fixed before any release. About maintenance releases: I t

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

@tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement Java EE 7. The work has already started with openwebbeans and bean validation. Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by the end of September. Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA? Are they absolutely nece

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7? On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly hack we have ATM, > normally should be here at the end of the week > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* > *Twitter: @rmannibucau

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly hack we have ATM, normally should be here at the end of the week *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau * *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* *LinkedIn: **http:/

Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :( Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" a écrit : > Hey guys, > > was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0. > Is there any other releases we have to wait for? > Does anybody has important things in progress? > > It's been a very lon

Time to release TomEE 1.6.0

Hey guys, was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0. Is there any other releases we have to wait for? Does anybody has important things in progress? It's been a very long time since latest release and it's necessary in my opinion to get it out soon now. Any thoughts? -- Jean-Louis