for Cocoon?
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:45:42 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
I'm currently reworking our system to add finer grained cache
normalization and I'm a tad confused as to exactly how Cocoon
checks cache validity. In particular, as the subject line
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:53:14 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
I'm still confused:
1) Why can't the validity itself figure out whatever it needs to know.
Eg, go look at the file to see if has been modified?
The validity object is just a value
does things correctly
--
Peter Hunsberger
. We use this pattern in our
code and it works well.
It seems to me that most of the pieces are already present in Cocoon.
Anyone have any specific comments on things I should look at or
anything I might be missing?
--
Peter Hunsberger
be.
snipJBoss 4 description/snip
--
Peter Hunsberger
as an exercise for the reader.
--
Peter Hunsberger
with
two different sections? The less places I have to look for
configuration information the better...
snip more good details/snip
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:16:16 -0800, Miles Elam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:30 AM, Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:44:24 -0800, Miles Elam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So what do you say to function sources?
Interesting. Did you read my post yesterday
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:15:27 -0800, Miles Elam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 24, 2004, at 7:31 AM, Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:16:16 -0800, Miles Elam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes. The src attribute is a String. What you do with that String
has always been
xhtml (or whatever). In some cases this simply
means adding class attributes since much of our actual styling is left
to CSS, but in other cases we do create gobs of xhtml...
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:41:01 +0100, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:57:13 +0100, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[catching up the list - guys, you were so verbose lately !]
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Just wondering why
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:02:40 -0800, Roy G. Biv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
We've brought Cocoon up under JBoss 4 and it behaves a litte
strangely. Haven't figured out exactly what is going on but it
appears that -- with no other configuration changes being made
flow...
--
Peter Hunsberger
for that matter)...
IOW, if you need to refactor templates, allow templates to be
normalized WRT to each other. I don't think you need a new concept
--
Peter Hunsberger
lenses and filters working together as separate components
and not mixed together the way Xenon seems to do. I wonder if there's
some SOC in the view model that really remains to be completely
abstracted? I'm not sure lens is an abstraction I find completely
understandable...
--
Peter Hunsberger
could catch at least some people by surprise...
and we can provide some meaningful error messages
if ever the situation arises.
So, let's implement the basic import first and add little sweeties
afterwards ;-)
Sounds like a good way to go.
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:15:15 +0100, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:51:52 +0100, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipsyntax discussion/snip
This is a good compromise between automagically loading all *.xconf (see
my
and documentation purposes...
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:25:05 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:55:23 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Somewhat RT I believe that the pluggable matchers in the sitemap is FS
and do more harm than good
today and not use the UGLI parameter substitution? Isn't
the fact that it can do substitution on up to two parameters just the
equivalent of some extra convenience methods? Or is there something
else I missed?
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:21:01 -0600 (CST), Antonio Gallardo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mie, 5 de Enero de 2005, 14:14, Peter Hunsberger dijo:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:06:14 +0100, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snipother loggers/snip
and it looks like -1 on UGLI from Torsten
gone away with UGLI, you just get some extra methods you can
ignore if you want?
...and why would you want to go through the hassle and switch from
logkit then?
So you don't have to use logkit? (it wasn't my idea to switch)...
Where is the benefit of using UGLI then?
--
Peter
string
concatenation with an isDebugEnabled() guard. UGLI does not take away
anything in this regard.
Yah, I just pointed that out a couple of messages ago and Torsten
responded by asking why you shoudl bother switching in that case...
--
Peter Hunsberger
implied)
the instructions on how to obtain the keys needed to get into the
doctors office and the file drawers containing your medical
information...
--
Peter Hunsberger
that Daniel might be coming at this from a mostly
application POV. If so, for such cases, I think you can't _always_ be
quite as dogmatic about how a URL is structured; for many apps there's
little to no exectation of long term URI persistance/repeatability.
--
Peter Hunsberger
(Won't be able
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:38:35 -0600, Glen Ezkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:28:06 -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See? the problem is that you are partitioning the matching space with
URL
on this...
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:04:38 -0600, Glen Ezkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2005, at 9:17 AM, Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:48:29 -0600, Glen Ezkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snipstuff everyone seems to agree on/snip\
You've got to allow for variations
( parameters )
on the front end, but that's not 100%, flow script can mangle the
mapping completely in some cases and even in the generic case there's
a lookup substitution.
--
Peter Hunsberger
want to use XSLT 2 then use it.
What many people seem to want is a template language other than XSLT.
Personally, I agree that that seems to be re-inventing the wheel, but
open source communities seem to like constant mutant evolution...
--
Peter Hunsberger
of the data classes handed off from the EJB layer to XML
but all of our beans are designed from the get go to map to the front
end requirements.
sniplazy DOM adapter approach/snip
--
Peter Hunsberger
on the OM
itself and let its JS counterpart follow its evolutions.
+1 Yes, please.
--
Peter Hunsberger
extending Parameters with
getParameterAsObject,
setParameter(String, Object) should be enough.
Wow, the very first Cocoon related bugzilla entry I ever voted on.
Big +1 for fixing this the right way!
--
Peter Hunsberger
object (more or less)...
--
Peter Hunsberger
discussion on creating a BPEL to
flowscript XSLT. No one's had a reason to do it yet, but there's more
than one way to skin this cat...
--
Peter Hunsberger
(with
no code changes required). Given that there's no real cost to using a
PI instead of a comment allowing for future use cases we haven't yet
come up with seems more forward thinking
--
Peter Hunsberger
that this will show up in a 2.1.x branch?
If it's in 2.1.x can we get a release some time real soon pretty please?
--
Peter Hunsberger
...)
--
Peter Hunsberger
of
the picture) seems natural? Eg, prebuilt Javascript pipeline objects.
If you want to do this in Java, then really, source resolvers already
give you (more-or-less) the Cocoon way of doing this...
--
Peter Hunsberger
this be marked stable in 2.1.7?
because to me it feels weird to have such a major solidification between
2.1.6 band 2.1.7
3) rename jxtemplate as CTemplate and moving it in the core as well
In 2.1.X? That would create a problem.
+1 for 2.2.
oh, yeah, I'm talking about 2.2
--
Peter
wouldn't be surprised if you find that you can move
your ideas forward if you're willing to contribute to the project as
it currently is heading and not try and turn things around with one
big sweeping massive change.
--
Peter Hunsberger
(to determine flow path as
a result of validation) and shown in the form if there where errors.
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:14:56 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:33:32 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
As discussed in various threads we need
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:51:13 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:14:56 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:33:32 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED
is that everyone should take a step back and make sure
the existing Cocoon machinery for source resolving and xpath traversal
isn't re-usable in some way before inventing anything new...
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:19:24 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
snipolder conversation/snip
Sources are designed for giving access to streams (and due to eficciency
reasons SAX streams) and the object accessors are intended to give
access to script
giving a CCE on an
naked null. Surprised the heck out of me...
--
Peter Hunsberger
of a block.
A stable block that has worked for years and is never in need of
maintenance might be a very valuable contribution. Such things could
fall through the cracks if all you measure is how many people are
working on a block.
--
Peter Hunsberger
want...
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:36:33 -0500, Stefano Mazzocchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
I would go a little further and say that I believe inheritance is useful
only when used as a 'cascading' mechanism, in any other sense is
harmful: composition should be used instead.
Why
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:42:38 +0200, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
One comment: I'd hope that you don't literally copy the
portal-page.xsl and modify it? Instead you should be creating a new
XSL, including portal-page.xsl in it and just modifying
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:03:40 +0200, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:42:38 +0200, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
One comment: I'd hope that you don't literally copy the
portal-page.xsl and modify
community it is going to be the code
that counts. However, that shouldn't stop any discussion before or
after the fact. There's a thousand different view points out there
and just bringing them to light may trigger ideas that no one would
have considered otherwise...
--
Peter Hunsberger
isn't crazy to allow blocks to specify a resolver intercept
scheme. Just lift the code directly out of mod-rewrite/mod-redirect
and let a block tell Cocoon what URI's have special concerns:
resolvermatch spec/resolver
then you can go either way...
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Apr 4, 2005 11:16 AM, Daniel Fagerstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Apr 4, 2005 10:26 AM, Daniel Fagerstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 31 Mar 2005, at 01:26, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
snip/
As all URI discussions tend
requirements, where as using
naming hacks in existing sections of the sitemap may be rather fragile
in the long run.
--
Peter Hunsberger
On Apr 12, 2005 9:05 AM, Daniel Fagerstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On Apr 12, 2005 5:50 AM, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
big snip/
So in the end, my opinion is that sitemap fragments
to the Source Forge project and include something in the
Cocoon docs...
--
Peter Hunsberger
of using an iterator, eg:
Object[] list = targetObjects.keySet().toArray();
Peter Hunsberger
On 5/10/05, Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On 5/10/05, Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
If you want to tinker with ContinuationsManagerImpl, take a look at:
http
On 5/10/05, Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On 5/10/05, Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On 5/10/05, Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Still HashMap has no interface other than iterator to get it's contents
it hits production.)
Personally, I'd say JFDI; build a 2.2 alpha, only put new features in
2.2 and plan on keeping on doing bug fixes on the 2.1 branch through
at least a 2.1.9.
--
Peter Hunsberger
...
snip/
--
Peter Hunsberger
:
!--+
| fi:imagemap
+--
xsl:template match=fi:imagemap
input type =image name=[EMAIL PROTECTED] src=[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
title={fi:hint} ismap=true
xsl:apply-templates select=. mode=styling/
/input
/xsl:template
snip/
--
Peter Hunsberger
this might help...
--
Peter Hunsberger (not an expert in semantic web technologies...)
and Ontology
processing in general; non-trivial stuff...
--
Peter Hunsberger
reasonable, but maybe you'll want to keep some of these people as
committers even after the GSOC contribution period is done? It might
be nice if they didn't have their e-mail address change if this
happens...
--
Peter Hunsberger
in the
current stylesheet
snip/
--
Peter Hunsberger
are but one of our guys uses oXygen:
http://www.oxygenxml.com/
--
Peter Hunsberger
.index and
cocoon-ehcache-1.data) and restart Cocoon...
--
Peter Hunsberger
to issue one error then stop checking...
Only testing will tell you for sure if caching is worth it, for us it
makes a huge difference...
--
Peter Hunsberger
what I am wondering is if setting overflowToDisk to false in
ehcache.xml would make much of a difference.
Ralph
--
Peter Hunsberger
may be more
fruitful you can ask more here or there...
--
Peter Hunsberger
as the attribute separator (the dash
'-', above) you can then either force the elements without a name
attribute to come first or last...
--
Peter Hunsberger
stack trace stuff.
--
Peter Hunsberger
cause more problems in the
long run. The fact is, although cforms may be important to you to some
of us it makes no difference.
--
Peter Hunsberger
http://people.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
Apache Software Foundation Member Research Technology Director
--
Peter Hunsberger
had a business partner that insisted on using it.
Must have at least doubled the size and complexity of the project
snip/
--
Peter Hunsberger
have the new number (and be exposed to the new system).
One mass e-mailing (for conversion and amnesty) instead of two (one
for conversion and one for amnesty).
BTW personally; bug amnesty sounds strange, I don't think it really
conveys what you are trying to achieve...
--
Peter Hunsberger
to
wait until this process is done.
See my conments in the Move to Jira (Was: Re: Jira or Bugzilla...)
thread about combining the migration with the Bugzilla cleanup
--
Peter Hunsberger
On 10/14/05, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 14 oct. 05, à 15:46, Peter Hunsberger a écrit :
snip/
a) move issues to jira first, set bugzilla readonly
b) do the cleanup in jira, which will send the emails to people with
links to jira
c) people go to jira to confirm
the fixes and a fixed release date won't
necessarily make the fixes happen...
--
Peter Hunsberger
level
abstractions...
--
Peter Hunsberger
On 10/20/05, Ugo Cei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Now it works but it's the HTMLArea which stopped working ... sigh
Try changing thhe priority the other way (bet you're using Saxon?)
--
Peter Hunsberger
On 10/20/05, Ugo Cei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il giorno 20/ott/05, alle ore 22:14, Peter Hunsberger ha scritto:
On 10/20/05, Ugo Cei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Now it works but it's the HTMLArea which stopped working ...
sigh
Try changing thhe priority the other way (bet
, next we need
a way for the server to truly understand what that interaction means,
requires, and implies in a global sense.
--
Peter Hunsberger
here soon.
Ok, we won't be staring our next release cycle for at least 8 months
(we're halfway into a big one at the moment) ;-)
--
Peter Hunsberger
isn't a cocoon?
I always sort of figured that symbolically at least there was a Cocoon
in the logo; the oval wrapping around the word Cocoon... I _might_
play with different colors but I like the current design.
--
Peter Hunsberger
was. The advantage
to this is that it can allow a more generic sitemap.
--
Peter Hunsberger
others have in
the past); you may have to add some functionality, but it would be a
start...
--
Peter Hunsberger
:( It might make the task a bit more interesting
though ;)
If you do the diff would give them to you on one nice single spot :-)
--
Peter Hunsberger
before in IE6.
Works for me: IE 6, Win 2k.
Jörg
aaargh.
I have WinXPPro. Why can't it be consistent?
I don't see any errors simply displaying the form you sent: I'm on Win
XP Pro SP2. IE 6 (6.0.2800.1106)..??
--
Peter Hunsberger
of comparison or can
point me to something?
Can't help directly, but be sure to point out that they should also
factor in development and maintenance costs to get the total picture.
Note that if you end up doing the testing yourself Cocoon will could
loose unless you exploit caching.
--
Peter
, but the discussion itself helps
to keep everyone focused on what is needed now vs. what could be done
in the future...
--
Peter Hunsberger
of
initializing the code. It's pretty darn clear what's going on to any
user of the code. As a Cocoon user I really think that any objection
to this proposal based on it might be confusing to users is bogus...
--
Peter Hunsberger
if you can reproduce
with a debugger attached?
--
Peter Hunsberger
.
Random guess: continuation clean up? Is it possible that you some how
have a looping continuations tree? Do you use createWebContination
in your calculator to manually book mark things? If so, could there
be a loop in the resultant continuations structure?
--
Peter Hunsberger
On 1/30/06, Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, if I'm the only one thinking that removing the whole env
abstraction makes sense, I'll shut up for now.
Nope. Makes perfect sense to me, please continue on this crusade.
--
Peter Hunsberger
/*
map:generate src=data/{1}/
Or is the source name not something the user can specify? If not,
where is it supposed to come from?
--
Peter Hunsberger
1 - 100 of 300 matches
Mail list logo
