ser annoyed by the fact that a hyperlink pointing to an mp4 file (as
> > opposed to an mp3 file)
> > raises a warning.
> >
> > As you all remember, the list of safe extensions was one of the issues
> > discussed
> > in the "Hyperlink Warning Message" threa
arning.
>
> As you all remember, the list of safe extensions was one of the issues
> discussed
> in the "Hyperlink Warning Message" thread on dev@.
>
> Shouldn't the mp4 extension be allowed?
We already allowed m4a. I don't think mp4 should be a problem?
Regards,
discussed
in the "Hyperlink Warning Message" thread on dev@.
Shouldn't the mp4 extension be allowed?
Best regards,
Czesław
[1]
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=108184
[2]
https://lists.apache.org/thread/pzlwfqzbxtllvrm6wlcmyc25fqzlofr2
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:21:49AM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Find a Windows build here:
>
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4111-Test/Full%20Installation/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.11_Win_x86_install_en-US_f2fa887bab.exe
Thank you!
...also for updating the
Hi all,
Find a Windows build here:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4111-Test/Full%20Installation/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.11_Win_x86_install_en-US_f2fa887bab.exe
Regards,
Matthias
Am 24.06.21 um 03:17 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Arrigo,
>
> On 6/23/21 1:19 PM, Arrigo Marchiori
Hi Arrigo,
On 6/23/21 1:19 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Dear All,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 07:41:23PM +0200, Marcus wrote:
Am 22.06.21 um 19:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
What about adding .wpl .m3u etc. to the list of secure file extensions?
I would like to build a new version soon to let our
Hi Arrigo,
Am 23.06.21 um 19:19 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Dear All,
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 07:41:23PM +0200, Marcus wrote:
>
>> Am 22.06.21 um 19:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> What about adding .wpl .m3u etc. to the list of secure file extensions?
>>>
>>> I would like to build a new
Dear All,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 07:41:23PM +0200, Marcus wrote:
> Am 22.06.21 um 19:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> > What about adding .wpl .m3u etc. to the list of secure file extensions?
> >
> > I would like to build a new version soon to let our users test...
>
> +1
>
> Marcus
I just
Am 22.06.21 um 19:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
What about adding .wpl .m3u etc. to the list of secure file extensions?
I would like to build a new version soon to let our users test...
+1
Marcus
Am 15.06.21 um 18:36 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 15.06.21 um 18:34 schrieb Marcus:
Am
Hi all,
What about adding .wpl .m3u etc. to the list of secure file extensions?
I would like to build a new version soon to let our users test...
Regards,
Matthias
Am 15.06.21 um 18:36 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Am 15.06.21 um 18:34 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 14.06.21 um 17:46
Hi Marcus,
Am 15.06.21 um 18:34 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 14.06.21 um 17:46 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 14.06.21 um 17:39 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 14.06.21 um 16:58 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
the original poster of bug 128453 correctly noted that the bug was not
solved _for him_:
Am 14.06.21 um 17:46 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 14.06.21 um 17:39 schrieb Marcus:
Am 14.06.21 um 16:58 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
the original poster of bug 128453 correctly noted that the bug was not
solved _for him_: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128453#c9
In his case, AOO is
Hi,
Am 14.06.21 um 17:39 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 14.06.21 um 16:58 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>> the original poster of bug 128453 correctly noted that the bug was not
>> solved _for him_: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128453#c9
>>
>> In his case, AOO is showing a warning when he tries to
Am 14.06.21 um 16:58 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
the original poster of bug 128453 correctly noted that the bug was not
solved _for him_: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128453#c9
In his case, AOO is showing a warning when he tries to open a WPL
file, that is a Windows Media Player
Dear All,
the original poster of bug 128453 correctly noted that the bug was not
solved _for him_: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128453#c9
In his case, AOO is showing a warning when he tries to open a WPL
file, that is a Windows Media Player playlist:
Hi Marcus,
Am 14.06.21 um 15:58 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 12.06.21 um 03:47 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>> On 6/11/21 6:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 10.06.21 um 15:53 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Could you provide a test document?
Or (if you use Windows) make a test with this build:
Am 12.06.21 um 03:47 schrieb Carl Marcum:
On 6/11/21 6:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 10.06.21 um 15:53 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Could you provide a test document?
Or (if you use Windows) make a test with this build:
Hello Matthias, all,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 08:00:52PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 12.06.21 um 19:55 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > Hi Carl
> >
> >> On 06/12/2021 6:45 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
> >> There is now a PR #132 if you're able to test it.
> > What do you mean test the PR?
Hi Pedro,
Am 12.06.21 um 19:55 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Carl
>
>> On 06/12/2021 6:45 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
>> There is now a PR #132 if you're able to test it.
> What do you mean test the PR? I already tested the resulting binary...
The Windows binary... ;-)
>
> The only action available for me
Hi Carl
> On 06/12/2021 6:45 PM Carl Marcum wrote:
> There is now a PR #132 if you're able to test it.
What do you mean test the PR? I already tested the resulting binary...
The only action available for me at github is "Merge pull request" :)
Cheers,
Pedro
Hi Pedro,
On 6/12/21 12:22 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
Hi Carl, all
On 06/12/2021 2:47 AM Carl Marcum wrote:
Can anyone on windows confirm with the file [1]?
[1] http://home.apache.org/~cmarcum/hyperlink-tests/hyperlink-test-doc.odt
I confirm Francis' findings on AOO 4.1.11 running on Windows 7
Hi Carl, all
> On 06/12/2021 2:47 AM Carl Marcum wrote:
> Can anyone on windows confirm with the file [1]?
> [1] http://home.apache.org/~cmarcum/hyperlink-tests/hyperlink-test-doc.odt
I confirm Francis' findings on AOO 4.1.11 running on Windows 7 x64.
There is no problem reopening the
Hi Arrigo,
Am 12.06.21 um 15:01 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Hello all,
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:42:19PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> Hi Carl,
>>
>> Am 12.06.21 um 13:26 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> On 6/12/21 5:10 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl, all,
Hello all,
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:42:19PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> Am 12.06.21 um 13:26 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > On 6/12/21 5:10 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> >> Hi Carl, all,
> >>
> >> Tests look great and we should think about merging the fix into
Hi Carl,
Am 12.06.21 um 13:26 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 6/12/21 5:10 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Carl, all,
>>
>> Tests look great and we should think about merging the fix into the
>> official AOO4111 branch.
> Yes merge it in AOO41X and branch from it.
>
> Yes I think it's
Hi Matthias,
On 6/12/21 5:10 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl, all,
Tests look great and we should think about merging the fix into the
official AOO4111 branch.
Yes merge it in AOO41X and branch from it.
Yes I think it's ready for trunk and AOO42X also.
Maybe we wait for the other two
Hi Francis,
On 6/11/21 11:31 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
I downloaded the test document and tried the links using 4.1.10. I saw the
expected warnings. Closing the file and reopening via the drop down list on
the Open button worked with no problem. I then installed the 4.1.11 linked
above
Hi Carl, all,
Tests look great and we should think about merging the fix into the
official AOO4111 branch.
Additionally we could need test builds for mac and Linux.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 12.06.21 um 03:47 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 6/11/21 6:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
I downloaded the test document and tried the links using 4.1.10. I saw the
expected warnings. Closing the file and reopening via the drop down list on
the Open button worked with no problem. I then installed the 4.1.11 linked
above (Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.11_Win_x86_install_en-US_6652b2eb2e.exe
Hi Matthias,
On 6/11/21 6:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Keith, all,
Am 10.06.21 um 15:53 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Keith,
Could you provide a test document?
Or (if you use Windows) make a test with this build:
Hi Keith, all,
Am 10.06.21 um 15:53 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Keith,
>
> Could you provide a test document?
>
> Or (if you use Windows) make a test with this build:
>
>
Hi Carl,
Am 12.06.21 um 00:12 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 6/11/21 5:05 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Carl,
>>
>> Am 11.06.21 um 23:01 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> On 6/10/21 9:53 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Keith,
Could you provide a test
Hi Matthias,
On 6/11/21 5:05 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl,
Am 11.06.21 um 23:01 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi Matthias,
On 6/10/21 9:53 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Keith,
Could you provide a test document?
Or (if you use Windows) make a test with this build:
Hi Keith,
Am 11.06.21 um 21:24 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 2021-06-10 09:53, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> Could you provide a test document?
>>
>> Or (if you use Windows) make a test with this build:
>>
>>
Hi Carl,
Am 11.06.21 um 23:01 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 6/10/21 9:53 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> Could you provide a test document?
>>
>> Or (if you use Windows) make a test with this build:
>>
>>
Hi Matthias,
On 6/10/21 9:53 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Keith,
Could you provide a test document?
Or (if you use Windows) make a test with this build:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/Full%20Installation/Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_56e2535bb8.exe
On 2021-06-10 09:53, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> Could you provide a test document?
>
> Or (if you use Windows) make a test with this build:
>
> https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/Full%20Installation/Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_56e2535bb8.exe
>
Hi Marcus,
On 6/10/21 9:29 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 08.06.21 um 11:16 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Find the Windows build here:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4111-Test/Full%20Installation/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.11_Win_x86_install_en-US_6652b2eb2e.exe
here my results:
Hi Keith,
Could you provide a test document?
Or (if you use Windows) make a test with this build:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/Full%20Installation/Apache_OpenOffice_4.2.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_56e2535bb8.exe
Regards,
Matthias
Am 04.05.21 um 16:05 schrieb
Am 08.06.21 um 11:16 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Find the Windows build here:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4111-Test/Full%20Installation/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.11_Win_x86_install_en-US_6652b2eb2e.exe
here my results:
http://www.openoffice.org/
Hi all,
Find the Windows build here:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-4111-Test/Full%20Installation/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.11_Win_x86_install_en-US_6652b2eb2e.exe
Regards,
Matthias
Am 07.06.21 um 18:09 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 07.06.21 um 02:12 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>> Hi Arrigo,
Am 07.06.21 um 02:12 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi Arrigo,
On 6/6/21 3:56 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Carl, All,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 11:50:12AM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Arrigo and All,
On 6/5/21 5:53 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Carl, All,
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:47:12PM
Hi Arrigo,
On 6/6/21 3:56 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Carl, All,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 11:50:12AM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Arrigo and All,
On 6/5/21 5:53 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Carl, All,
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:47:12PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Arrigo,
On
Hello Carl, All,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 11:50:12AM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Arrigo and All,
>
> On 6/5/21 5:53 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> > Hello Carl, All,
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:47:12PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Arrigo,
> > >
> > > On 6/5/21 9:50 AM,
Hi Arrigo and All,
On 6/5/21 5:53 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Carl, All,
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:47:12PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi Arrigo,
On 6/5/21 9:50 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Dear Matthias, Czesław, All,
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
On 05.06.21 15:50, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Dear Matthias, Czesław, All,
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Czesław,
Am 05.06.21 um 12:35 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
Hi Matthias, all
A preliminary check in Calc (Windows 7, 64-bit)
(1) in-document links
Hello Carl, All,
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:47:12PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Arrigo,
>
> On 6/5/21 9:50 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> > Dear Matthias, Czesław, All,
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Czesław,
> > >
> > > Am 05.06.21 um
Hi Arrigo,
On 6/5/21 9:50 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Dear Matthias, Czesław, All,
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Czesław,
Am 05.06.21 um 12:35 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
Hi Matthias, all
A preliminary check in Calc (Windows 7, 64-bit)
(1) in-document
Dear Matthias, Czesław, All,
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Czesław,
>
> Am 05.06.21 um 12:35 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> > Hi Matthias, all
> >
> > A preliminary check in Calc (Windows 7, 64-bit)
> >
> > (1) in-document links beginning with #
> > test:
Hi Matthias,
> That's what I expected, since the patches are for file://
>
> .uno: hasn't been addressed yet
Yes I know.
"The impossible we can do right now. Miracles take a little longer." ;‑)
Regards,
Czesław
сб, 5 июн. 2021 г. в 12:39, Matthias Seidel :
> Hi Czesław,
>
> Am 05.06.21 um
Hi Czesław,
Am 05.06.21 um 12:35 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> Hi Matthias, all
>
> A preliminary check in Calc (Windows 7, 64-bit)
>
> (1) in-document links beginning with #
> test: button with link to other sheet
> result: OK (no security warning)
>
> (2) .uno:XXX links
> result: security warning
Hi Matthias, all
A preliminary check in Calc (Windows 7, 64-bit)
(1) in-document links beginning with #
test: button with link to other sheet
result: OK (no security warning)
(2) .uno:XXX links
result: security warning
(3) Links to local files
test: the "Hyperlink" dialog, button "WWW Browser"
Hi all,
Am 04.06.21 um 19:20 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi Arrigo,
>
> Am 01.06.21 um 21:57 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>>> We are grabbing an INetURLObject here:
>>> http://opengrok.openoffice.org/xref/aoo4110/main/sfx2/source/appl/appopen.cxx?r=b1cdbd2c#929
>>>
>>> The code after here
>>>
Hello All,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:00:08PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
> > On Jun 2, 2021, at 11:58 AM, Marcus wrote:
> >
> > Am 02.06.21 um 00:07 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> >> On 01.06.21 21:57, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> > I would not go for file://. Can we go for a pattern derivated from
Hi Arrigo,
Am 01.06.21 um 21:57 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
>> We are grabbing an INetURLObject here:
>> http://opengrok.openoffice.org/xref/aoo4110/main/sfx2/source/appl/appopen.cxx?r=b1cdbd2c#929
>>
>> The code after here
>>
> On Jun 2, 2021, at 11:58 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 02.06.21 um 00:07 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> On 01.06.21 21:57, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> I would not go for file://. Can we go for a pattern derivated from
> file://path/document.ods#anchor ?
>>> I am not sure I understand your
Am 02.06.21 um 00:07 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
On 01.06.21 21:57, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
I would not go for file://. Can we go for a pattern derivated from
file://path/document.ods#anchor ?
I am not sure I understand your question, Peter.
I am suggesting not to trust file:// in general, but the
On 01.06.21 21:57, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
I would not go for file://. Can we go for a pattern derivated from
file://path/document.ods#anchor ?
I am not sure I understand your question, Peter.
I am suggesting not to trust file:// in general, but the anchored URL,
maybe file://*#anchor if
Dear All,
I'll attempt a multi-level reply here :-)
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 12:26:52PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
> > On May 28, 2021, at 3:01 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > On 5/28/21 4:46 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> >>
> >> On 28.05.21 22:04, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> >>>
> On May 28, 2021, at 3:01 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> On 5/28/21 4:46 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> On 28.05.21 22:04, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> replying to an older message in this thread.
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum
> On May 28, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> replying to an older message in this thread.
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> [...]
>> Hopefully we can collect the exceptions in the BZ issue noted in this thread
>> and then
Hi All,
On 5/28/21 4:46 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
On 28.05.21 22:04, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello all,
replying to an older message in this thread.
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
[...]
Hopefully we can collect the exceptions in the BZ issue noted in
this
On 28.05.21 22:04, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello all,
replying to an older message in this thread.
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
[...]
Hopefully we can collect the exceptions in the BZ issue noted in this thread
and then agree on the direction.
The few I see
Hello all,
replying to an older message in this thread.
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
[...]
> Hopefully we can collect the exceptions in the BZ issue noted in this thread
> and then agree on the direction.
>
> The few I see so far are:
> 1. in-document links
Hi Jim,
Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>>
> FWIW, I tend to agree.
> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
>
> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
>
FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, but I
Am 14.05.21 um 10:19 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Arrigo,
Am 14.05.21 um 07:27 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
Hello Carl, all,
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
[...]
Hopefully we can collect the exceptions in the BZ issue noted in this thread
and then agree on the
Am 14.05.21 um 07:27 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
[...]
I suggest we make up our minds on the intended solution first, and
then start coding it. We have seen some interesting proposals, some of
which were quite complex (adding
Hi Arrigo,
Am 14.05.21 um 07:27 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> Hello Carl, all,
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Hopefully we can collect the exceptions in the BZ issue noted in this thread
>> and then agree on the direction.
>>
>> The few I see so far
On 14.05.21 07:27, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Yes, but that will only work for trunk/AOO42X since we need to update
the translations too.
I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
We all
Hello Carl, all,
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
[...]
> Hopefully we can collect the exceptions in the BZ issue noted in this thread
> and then agree on the direction.
>
> The few I see so far are:
> 1. in-document links beginning with #.
> 2. .uno:XXX links
> 3.
Hi Matthias,
On 5/13/21 6:32 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl,
Am 14.05.21 um 00:26 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi Matthias,
On 5/13/21 9:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl,
Am 13.05.21 um 13:05 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi All,
On 5/13/21 3:01 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Does it make sense in
Hi Carl,
Am 14.05.21 um 00:26 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 5/13/21 9:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>
>> Hi Carl,
>>
>> Am 13.05.21 um 13:05 schrieb Carl Marcum:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> On 5/13/21 3:01 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Does it make sense in addition to create a Wiki page
Hi Matthias,
On 5/13/21 9:23 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Carl,
Am 13.05.21 um 13:05 schrieb Carl Marcum:
Hi All,
On 5/13/21 3:01 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Does it make sense in addition to create a Wiki page with all types
of Links that we can have?
So we have some sort of Documentation.
Hi Carl,
Am 13.05.21 um 13:05 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi All,
>
> On 5/13/21 3:01 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>> Does it make sense in addition to create a Wiki page with all types
>> of Links that we can have?
>>
>> So we have some sort of Documentation.
>>
>> Also maybe the ODF specification can
Hi All,
On 5/13/21 3:01 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Does it make sense in addition to create a Wiki page with all types of
Links that we can have?
So we have some sort of Documentation.
Also maybe the ODF specification can give us hints what type there is.
On 12.05.21 22:12, Arrigo Marchiori
Does it make sense in addition to create a Wiki page with all types of
Links that we can have?
So we have some sort of Documentation.
Also maybe the ODF specification can give us hints what type there is.
On 12.05.21 22:12, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello all,
please allow me to top-post as I
Hello Marcus, all,
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:17:22PM +0200, Marcus wrote:
> Am 12.05.21 um 22:12 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
> > please allow me to top-post as I just need a ``public reminder''.
Thank you for your patience
> > An Italian user reported another problem [1]: they have links that
>
Am 12.05.21 um 22:12 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
please allow me to top-post as I just need a ``public reminder''.
An Italian user reported another problem [1]: they have links that
point _to the same document_ and trigger the warning.
Even if you do not understand Italian, you can download the
Hello all,
please allow me to top-post as I just need a ``public reminder''.
An Italian user reported another problem [1]: they have links that
point _to the same document_ and trigger the warning.
Even if you do not understand Italian, you can download the attachment
and look at what the
Hi Ken,
Am 12.05.21 um 09:32 schrieb k...@kshelton.plus.com:
> Hello Marcus
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> We also have a ‘Close’ button in our document and this now also gives the
> same warning. The 'Reload' button is used regularly through the day as
> there is more than one person
Hi Ken,
I see your Reload button is using an UNO call.
What is the text of the warning when you use your Close button.
Are these buttons using your macros or was it an extension you added?
Thanks,
Carl
On 5/12/21 3:32 AM, k...@kshelton.plus.com wrote:
Hello Marcus
Thanks for your prompt
Hello Marcus
Thanks for your prompt reply.
We also have a ‘Close’ button in our document and this now also gives the same
warning. The 'Reload' button is used regularly through the day as there is
more than one person editing the document. We would certainly appreciate
being able to
Thanks!
Am 11.05.21 um 20:04 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Done
>
>> On May 11, 2021, at 1:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Will do...
>>
>>> On May 10, 2021, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 06.05.21 um 15:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 06.05.21 um 15:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Once
Done
> On May 11, 2021, at 1:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Will do...
>
>> On May 10, 2021, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 06.05.21 um 15:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 06.05.21 um 15:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Once we tag HEAD of AOO41X to AOO4110
>>> Can't wait! ;-)
>>> I
Will do...
> On May 10, 2021, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 06.05.21 um 15:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 06.05.21 um 15:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Once we tag HEAD of AOO41X to AOO4110
>> Can't wait! ;-)
>> I have dozens of commits to be backported to AOO41X...
>
> @Jim:
> Can you
Am 10.05.21 um 20:49 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 06.05.21 um 15:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 06.05.21 um 15:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Once we tag HEAD of AOO41X to AOO4110
>>
>> Can't wait! ;-)
>>
>> I have dozens of commits to be backported to AOO41X...
>
> @Jim:
> Can you please create the
Am 06.05.21 um 15:50 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 06.05.21 um 15:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Once we tag HEAD of AOO41X to AOO4110
Can't wait! ;-)
I have dozens of commits to be backported to AOO41X...
@Jim:
Can you please create the release tag from the 41X branch? Then we can
close the
ok, nice write up.
On 07.05.21 07:38, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi -
The discussion should proceed considering how appopen.cpp is actually coded.
I’m writing from memory so you will need to match my description to the actual
variables and constants
On May 5, 2021, at 5:37 AM, Arrigo Marchiori
Hi Dave,
We are talking about a whitelisting feature. And the discussion tries to
evaluate if requirements between macro and hyperlink do differ from user
perspective
I suggest not to mix whitlisting feature with the particular security method.
Ideal would be if the security has only the need
Hi -
The discussion should proceed considering how appopen.cpp is actually coded.
I’m writing from memory so you will need to match my description to the actual
variables and constants
> On May 5, 2021, at 5:37 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 07:08:11AM
I think it is really important to not mix macro security with hyperlink
security. We are discussing hyperlink security.
If you look into the bugzilla and the way we fixed the recently disclosed CVE
you will find that mixing the two was how many of these issues have lingered
for 15 years since
Greetings all;
Apologies for the encrypted version that went to the lists.here it is
unencrypted.
thoughts on the subject in line knmc, the other Keith in the room. ;)
On 2021-05-05 08:37, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 07:08:11AM +, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>> The
Hi Jim,
Am 06.05.21 um 15:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Once we tag HEAD of AOO41X to AOO4110
Can't wait! ;-)
I have dozens of commits to be backported to AOO41X...
Matthias
>
>> On May 6, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just a pragmatic question:
>>
>> When do
Once we tag HEAD of AOO41X to AOO4110
> On May 6, 2021, at 8:28 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just a pragmatic question:
>
> When do we want to start working on AOO 4.1.11?
>
> The sooner we branch it, the sooner we can do Test builds and let people
> see if their problem is
Hi all,
Just a pragmatic question:
When do we want to start working on AOO 4.1.11?
The sooner we branch it, the sooner we can do Test builds and let people
see if their problem is fixed...
Matthias
Am 05.05.21 um 23:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>
> On 05.05.21 22:11, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>
On 05.05.21 22:11, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello Peter, all,
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 05:44:17PM +, Peter Kovacs wrote:
On 05.05.21 14:37, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 07:08:11AM +, Peter Kovacs wrote:
The best approach I believe is to add a whitelist
Hello Peter, all,
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 05:44:17PM +, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> On 05.05.21 14:37, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 07:08:11AM +, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> >
> > > The best approach I believe is to add a whitelist feature as for macro
> > >
Am 05.05.21 um 14:37 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 07:08:11AM +, Peter Kovacs wrote:
The best approach I believe is to add a whitelist feature as for macro
files.
Users can add then the links they wish to approve.
Do you mean file-based whitelists instead of
Hello,
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 07:08:11AM +, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> The best approach I believe is to add a whitelist feature as for macro
> files.
>
> Users can add then the links they wish to approve.
Do you mean file-based whitelists instead of target-based?
I will try to explain myself
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
