Re: A Question Regarding TP4 Processor Classifications

Hello, Excellent progress on the the RxJava processor. I was wondering if categories 1 and 2 can be combined where Pipes becomes the Flowable version of the RxJava processor? In this case, though single threaded, we'd still get the benefit of asynchronous execution of traversal steps versus blockin

Re: A Question Regarding TP4 Processor Classifications

gt; > > > I believe, given the CPU utilization/etc. points you make, that RxJava > will come into its own in multi-threaded mode (called ParallelFlowable) > when trying to get real-time performance from a query that > touches/generates lots of data (traversers). This is the

Re: [TP4 Benchmarking] Pipes vs. Single-Threaded RxJava vs. Multi-Threaded RxJava

I hadn't put together that each compilation could have its own processor. Very cool. Thanks for the benchmarking numbers. I had a tp3 inspired JMH-based module in progress when I saw your results so I added the two test traversals in. It doesn't do any parameterization of input sizes at this point

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.3.1 Release

Docs and binaries look good, thanks for heading this up Stephen. VOTE: +1 Thanks, Ted On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:30 AM, pieter gmail wrote: > Hi, > > Tested Sqlg on 3.3.1. > > Custom, structured and process tests all pass. > > VOTE +1 > > Cheers > Pieter > > > On 17/12/2017 18:54, Stephen Malle

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.7 Release

VOTE: +1 Thanks, Ted On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > /projects/apache/tinkerpop (tp32) $ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.2.7 > > Validating binary distributions > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin > (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.7-bin.zip)... OK > * valida

Re: [TinkerPop] Re: New Committer: Kelvin Lawrence

Great news! Welcome Kelvin and thanks so much for all the work you've done. --Ted On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra wrote: > Welcome Kevin!!! > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Jason Plurad wrote: > > > Congrats, Kelvin! > > > > On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 9:49:57 AM UTC-5

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for Giraph in 3.4.0

I agree, I think it's a good idea to remove it. I haven't ever run into anyone using the GiraphGraphComputer. --Ted On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:03 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra wrote: > I'm +1 on removing support for Giraph. > > We should try to simplify the build as much as possible and this > integratio

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.2.8/3.3.2 Release Issues

Hi Stephen, I can take a crack at the 3.2.8 release. --Ted On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 3:43 PM Stephen Mallette wrote: > So, TINKERPOP-1865 merged and TINKERPOP-1866 is in PR form awaiting review: > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/823 > > Insanely great work from Florian Hockmann killing a

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Release

for the next 72 hours --- closing Friday April 6, 2018 at 11:00 AM CDT. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Release

r-3.2.8-bin.zip)... OK > > > > > > * validating signatures and checksums ... > > > > > > * PGP signature ... OK > > > > > > * MD5 checksum ... OK > > > > > > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > > > > >

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 4 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (4 -- Ted Wilmes, Daniel Kuppitz, Stephen Mallette, Jason Plurad) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (0) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

TinkerPop 3.2.8 Released: Nine Inch Gremlins

Hello, TinkerPop 3.2.8 has just been released. This release marks the first official release of the Gremlin Javascript GLV. The 3.2.8 release also includes a number of other bug fixes and updates. Please refer to the changelog for more details. The release artifacts can be found at this location:

Re: [TinkerPop] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Released: Nine Inch Gremlins

Apr 10, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> TinkerPop 3.2.8 has just been released. This release marks the first >> official release of the Gremlin Javascript GLV. The 3.2.8 release also >> includes a number of other bug fixes and updates. Please re

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.9 Release

Docs and validate looked good +1 Thanks, Ted On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 6:26 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > VOTE +1 - reviewed published docs a bit and validate-distribution.sh is > good > > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Robert Dale wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We are happy to announce that Tinker

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.3.3 Release

Docs and validate looked good VOTE +1 Thanks, Ted On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 5:38 AM, Robert Dale wrote: > VOTE +1 > > $ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.3.3 > > Validating binary distributions > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin > (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.3.3-bin.zip)... OK > * va

Re: [DISCUSS] Getting "Practical Gremlin" more visibilty

I'll register an official yes, yes, and yes. The docs will continue to serve as the source of truth and de facto TinkerPop reference. Practical Gremlin is a particularly good and comprehensive riff on that material that I think will resonate with many more folks if it is more easily found. Perhaps

Re: [DISCUSS] Review Process

I fell way off the PR review train, I'll get back on. For clarification, is that a +1 on top of the submitter +1? I'm thinking you all just meant the submitter's +1 would be adequate after the lazy consensus period but wanted to be sure. I'd be fine to moving with that. My impression is that with t

Re: [DISCUSS] Review Process

> >>> week > >>> > lazy consensus sounds fine to me. If the contribution is a major > >>> feature or > >>> > significant change, the expectation is that the committer realizes > >>> this and > >>> > holds it open fo

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecation around Java driver

That sounds like a good approach. At this point, would you envision those being TP specific options or perhaps include include hooks to support arbitrary provider options? --Ted On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 1:00 PM Stephen Mallette wrote: > Allow the setting of the scriptEvaluationTimeout per request

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.3/3.1.5

I was getting failures earlier today off of master. Just did a pull and things are looking good. --Ted On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > Push a commit to master earlier today to fix that issue we talked about > last week regarding the failing TraversalInterruptionTest.

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.3/3.1.5

docs look really solid for this release. Hopefully, > master is fully stable now and we won't need any more changes before I > build up the release for vote on monday. > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > I was getting failures earlier

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.3/3.1.5

http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.3-SNAPSHOT/ > > > > and they look pretty good (there was a problem with upgrade doc > > formatting). Upgrade docs look really solid for this release. Hopefully, > > master is fully stable now and we won't need any more changes be

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.3/3.1.5

te: > > > I think TINKERPOP-1511 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1511> should be fixed > in > > 3.2.3. > > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > > > A fresh 3.1.5-SNAPSHOT has been deployed along wi

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.5 Release

. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.3 Release

Tests and packaging were good along with docs. Manual monkey testing went well. VOTE: +1 --Ted On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Ran full integration tests and they passed — 4 hours and 58 minutes later. > > Also looked over all the doc URLs and they appear to be in go

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.5 Release

> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a=tag;h= > 89a17c3b4b5d33cbd9a8f4f587f6e41dc5dd30d7 > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.1.5 is ready for release. >

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.5 Release

2:08 PM, Jason Plurad wrote: > > > I'm finishing up my review, but it's looking fine so far. > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Stephen Mallette > > > wrote: > > > >> let's try to avoid the nays at this point please ;) > >> >

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.5 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 3 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Ted Wilmes, Stephen Mallette, Jason Plurad ) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (0) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: Code Freeze 3.2.3/3.1.5

> of > >> > junk logging around python output. Not sure what that's all about. > I've > >> > sent a note to kuppitz about it. At least it still works - you just > >> have to > >> > ignore that bit of output as it ultimately end

TinkerPop 3.1.5 Released: A 187 On The Undercover Gremlinz

Hello, TinkerPop 3.1.5 has just been released. This maintenance release contains a number of bug fixes on the "Undercover Gremlinz" release line and should be non-breaking for your upgrade needs. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/tinkerpo

Re: New Committer: Robert Dale

Welcome Robert! --Ted On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache TinkerPop has asked > Robert Dale to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he > has accepted. > > Robert has submitted a number of quality pull req

Re: Add HGraphDB to the homepage index?

Hi Robert, I stumbled upon your announcement earlier today. Exciting news! It looks like your project meets the index listing requirements. I'm going to send another message to dev to make sure there is consensus. Thanks, Ted On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Robert Yokota wrote: > Hi, > > I

[DISCUSS] Add HGraphDB to graph system listing

Hello everyone, Robert Yokota notified us today that he has developed an Apache TinkerPop enabled graph db: https://github.com/rayokota/hgraphdb. Correct me if I'm wrong Robert, but it looks like it's at the TinkerPop 3.2.3 version. I think HGraphDB meets our index listing requirements but I wante

Re: [DISCUSS] Add HGraphDB to graph system listing

nteresting thing. +1 to adding HGraphDB to the list. > > > > > > > > Minor concern: I'm not sure if we want to manage a curated list of > > > > implementations and maybe restrict to more mature projects. I'm just > > > > thinking out loud here: I

Re: [DISCUSS] Add HGraphDB to graph system listing

The 72 hours blew past and I didn't even notice. Looks like there aren't any objections so I'll get HGraphDB added to the listing tomorrow morning. Thanks, Ted On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > I think at this point it's not too big of a probl

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

Code freeze Friday sounds good to me. Yes, I'll be submitting a PR for the PathRetractionStrategy bugs (1583 & 1597). I can take the 3.1.6 release. --Ted On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > @Ted — Do you think you can fix the PathRetractionStrategy bugs for this > releas

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

Jason, I ctr'ed an update to docs adding instructions for getting keys setup. For some reason I'm getting consistent failures in the GLV portion of the docs when I'm generation them so I haven't published updated snapshots yet. For the time being though, if you haven't started the key process yet

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6

the GLV issue have something to do with your python setup? > or is it a problem with the docs themselves? > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > Jason, > > I ctr'ed an update to docs adding instructions for getting keys setup. > For > > so

Code Freeze 3.1.6

Hello, We are now under code freeze for 3.1.6. Updated snapshots have been published and I'll be doing one more publish later in the week with the finalized changelog. Let me know if anything comes up in the meantime and we'll get it incorporated. Thanks, Ted

ChooseStep & count type coercion

Hello, I wrote a traversal using a choose that included a count in the branching traversal. Here is a simplified version: g.V().choose(bothE().count()).option(1, constant(1)).option(3, constant(3)) I wasn't getting any results and then realized none of the options would match because count prod

Re: ChooseStep & count type coercion

to a > Java > > implementation and from being language-agnostic. > > > > Robert Dale > > > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> I wrote a traversal using a choose that included a count in the > branching

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.6 Release

--- closing Monday (2/6/2017) at 5:00 PM CST. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.6 Release

. OK > * MD5 checksum ... OK > * SHA1 checksum ... OK > * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.1.6 ... OK > * building project ... OK > > Note that I couldn't use the validate-distribution.sh on master for some > reason - it failed - had to use the one in tp31 and the above was my

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.6 Release

t; * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK > > > > * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK > > > > > > > > Validating source distribution > > > > > > > > * downloading Apache Tinke

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.4 Release

Release and docs looks good to me. Validating source distribution * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.4-src.zip)... OK * validating signatures and checksums ... * PGP signature ... OK * MD5 checksum ... OK * SHA1 checksum ... OK * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.4 ...

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.6 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 5 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (5 -- Ted Wilmes, Stephen Mallette, Daniel Kuppitz, Dylan Millikin, Jason Plurad) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (1 -- David Brown) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

3.1.x code freeze lifted

The code freeze is lifted on the 3.1.x line and the 3.1.7-SNAPSHOT has been published. Thanks, Ted

TinkerPop 3.1.6 Released: A 187 On The Undercover Gremlinz

Hello, TinkerPop 3.1.6 has just been released. This maintenance release contains a number of bug fixes on the "Undercover Gremlinz" release line and should be non-breaking for your upgrade needs. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/tinkerpop

Re: ChooseStep & count type coercion

Good catch and yep, that's the one. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Robert Dale wrote: > I think this is the correct link > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1620 > > Robert Dale > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > Thanks

Re: [DISCUSS] Upcoming Release 3.2.5/3.1.7

I can do the 3.1.7 line. --Ted On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > I think we should start to firm things up for release of 3.2.5 and 3.1.7. > I'd like to propose that our code freeze period start Saturday June 3 with > a VOTE for release Monday, June 12. Hopefully that s

Code Freeze 3.1.7

Hello, 3.1.7 is now frozen and a snapshot build and updated docs have been published. There isn't anything outstanding that I know of, but please let me know if anythings needs to be added this week. Thanks, Ted

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.7 Release

for the next 72 hours --- closing Thursday (June 15, 2017) at 8pm CST. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: code freeze 3.2.5

Good deal, should I close out the vote for 3.1.7 tonight, barring any -1's and then we can hold off on the announcement to coincide with 3.2.5? --Ted On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > Kuppitz (who has the day off today) just informed me that the fix he was > responsibl

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.7 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 3 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Ted Wilmes, Stephen Mallette, Daniel Kuppitz) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (0) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.5 Release

VOTE: +1 --Ted On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > bin/validate-distribution.sh still looking good. > > VOTE: +1 > > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Stephen Mallette > wrote: > > > Hello (again), > > > > We are happy to announce (again) that TinkerPop 3.2.5 is ready fo

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.7

tp31 is now reopened for 3.1.8 development. Thanks, Ted On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > Hello, > 3.1.7 is now frozen and a snapshot build and updated docs have been > published. There isn't anything outstanding that I know of, but please let > me know if a

TinkerPop 3.1.7 Released: A 187 On The Undercover Gremlinz

Hello, TinkerPop 3.1.7 has just been released. This maintenance release contains a number of bug fixes on the "Undercover Gremlinz" release line and should be non-breaking for your upgrade needs. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/tinkerpop

Re: ASF Board Draft Report - July 2017

quot; Keynote at Graph Day > by Dr. Marko Rodriguez[2][3] > - "Start Flying with Python and Apahce TinkerPop" at Graph Day > by Jason Plurad[4] > - "JanusGraph: Today and Looking to the Future" at Graph Day > by Ted Wilmes[5] > > ## Issues: >

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x EOL

That makes good sense to me. I'd be honored to lead it off into the sunset. --Ted On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Jorge Bay Gondra wrote: > 3.1 line is about 2 years old, I think its a lot of time for a relatively > new project like TinkerPop. > I'm in favor of making 3.1.8 the last release of

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.8/3.2.6/3.3.0

Good morning, The 3.1.8 SNAPSHOT docs and jars have been deployed. Thanks, Ted On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > For the next week we're in code freeze on tp31, tp32 and master. Let's > spend the next week testing and reviewing documentation. I've deployed the > latest

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.8 Release

open for the next 72 hours --- closing Thursday (August 24, 2017) at 4pm CST. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.8 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 3 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Ted Wilmes, Daniel Kuppitz, Stephen Mallette) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (0) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.6 Release

Validate distribution passed, docs look good. VOTE: +1 --Ted On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > weird - thanks for noticing. i'd be against stopping release over those > things - as you said, they are minor. let's fix those after release. > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 7:

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.3.0 Release

Validated distribution and docs look good. Epic release, great job. VOTE: +1 On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:00 AM, pieter gmail wrote: > Afraid I won't get time to refactor Sqlg's ChooseStep/OptionalStep > optimizations to deal with the new OptionalStep before the vote expires. > So all tests are

TinkerPop 3.1.8 Released: A 187 On The Undercover Gremlinz

Hello, TinkerPop 3.1.8 has just been released. This maintenance release contains a number of bug fixes on the "Undercover Gremlinz" release line and should be non-breaking for your upgrade needs. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/tinkerpop

Re: TinkerPop Tutorial

Wow, very impressive. Definitely should be on the list. Adding this to me reading list. --Ted On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hello, > > Kevin Lawrence posted this Gremlin tutorial on GitHub. > > https://github.com/krlawrence/graph krlawre

Re: [DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in witnessing the the post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out on an upcoming release. --Ted On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder wrote: > Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the artifactId as wel

Re: [DISCUSS] ASF Board Draft Report - June 2016

This looks good to me. Thanks, Ted On Sat, Jun 4, 2016, 11:54 AM Stephen Mallette wrote: > As TinkerPop has graduated from incubator, we no longer need to produce > incubator reports. Instead, TinkerPop needs to now provide reports to the > ASF Board. Ultimately, as PMC chair it is my responsib

Re: Planning for StarGraph's Serialization Format in TinkerPop 3.3.0

If folks thought it was a good idea, I'd love to put together a little benchmarking harness so that it would be easy to swap various implementations & tweaks in and out to measure how they perform. For example, benchmarks running against different #'s of vertex properties, edge counts, # of propert

Re: Planning for StarGraph's Serialization Format in TinkerPop 3.3.0

ther graph > providers? like UniPop could run gremlin-benchmark over its implementation > and compare it to Titan? > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > If folks thought it was a good idea, I'd love to put together a little > > b

Re: [DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

besides the source code > > >>> which > > >>>> is distributed as apache-tinkerpop-*.zip. The two other > distributions > > >> are > > >>>> gremlin-console and gremlin-server and I think we should keep those >

Re: [DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

As such, given the gargantuan undertaking, we will save > this work for a future release. > > Thanks, > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > On Jun 28, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > > I would like to get TinkerPop-1254 in before code fre

Re: [DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

;t think we can start a > code freeze on Monday as I'd proposed. > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > I had some time this week and made further progress on 1254. Still > working > > out some kinks but I'll see ho

Re: [DISCUSS] Thinking on Release

reviews now with some earnest. Unless there > > are concerns, I think that we should target code freeze for Friday at > this > > point. > > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > >> Quick update, I plan on getting a PR in late tonight

Re: [DISCUSS] ASF Board Draft Report - July 2016

Looks good, thanks Stephen. --Ted On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > ## Description: > Apache TinkerPop is a graph computing framework for both graph databases > (OLTP) and graph analytic systems (OLAP). > > It was reported last month that TinkerPop had still not compl

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x code line

It does for me too, +1. --Ted On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > +1. It does to me. > Hadrian > > > On 07/13/2016 04:29 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > >> Since we don't really follow semantic versioning for releases, I thought >> we >> should discuss the 3.1.x code line. W

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.3 Release

valitedate-distribution.sh looked good from my end along with manual tests and a review of the generated java and other docs. VOTE: +1 --Ted On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Dylan Millikin wrote: > Added tests for all the new features in the PHP driver. > Installed gremlin-neo4j and ran the te

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.1 Release

Validate distribution looks good along with manual inspection of docs and testing. Thanks for putting this all together Stephen and for running me through part of the process this time. VOTE: +1 --Ted On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > Thanks Hadrian - I read that sect

Re: path query optimization

Neat find Pieter. With regards to the update to ImmutablePath, I think that defensive copying of inbound collections is generally a good idea but if we can target specific areas where we can reap big gains from not creating new collections it may be worth it to relax that constraint, especially if

Re: [DISCUSS] Time Frames for 3.2.2 and 3.1.4

Hello, I think 9/5 is Labor Day. I'm wondering if we should keep the freeze on 8/27 but move the start of vote to 9/6. Not a big deal, but maybe some more folks (non-committers) would be around and see the vote thread started up if they wanted to test things out. As far as shorter release cycles

Re: [DISCUSS] Code Review TINKERPOP-1278: gremlin-python

I was taking a look at the various parts and reading the docs, which as usual were very comprehensive. Really impressive work guys. I think your plan is a good one Stephen so +1 from me. --Ted On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > There hasn't been much discussion here, s

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.4/3.2.2

Hello, The 3.1.4-SNAPSHOT has been published. As Stephen mentioned, we do not expect any non-doc changes/additions to tp31 but let me know if something comes up. I'll be reviewing the docs and publishing a doc snapshot later this week. Thanks, Ted On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Stephen Mallett

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.4/3.2.2

, 2016 at 7:52 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > Hello, > The 3.1.4-SNAPSHOT has been published. As Stephen mentioned, we do not > expect any > non-doc changes/additions to tp31 but let me know if something comes up. > I'll be reviewing > the docs and publishing a doc snapshot late

Re: New PMC: Jason Plurad

Welcome aboard Jason! --Ted On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Alaa Mahmoud wrote: > Congratulations Jason! > > Alaa > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Marko Rodriguez > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Jason Plurad of mailing list support, Gremlin Server/Console development, > > and IBM Graph fa

Re: Code Freeze 3.1.4/3.2.2

nually since you already generated that stuff. > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > > The 3.1.4-SNAPSHOT docs have been published to: http://tinkerpop.apache. > > org/docs/3.1.4-SNAPSHOT/ > > > > Changelog bugs and improvements

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.4 Release

2:00 PM CST. My vote is +1. Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.2 Release

validate-distribution.sh looked good along with the javadocs and docs rendering. VOTE: +1 Thanks, Ted On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > validate-distribution.sh is happy: > > Validating binary distributions > > * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin > (apache-tinkerpop-gr

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.4 Release

This vote is now closed with a total of 4 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Ted Wilmes, Stephen Mallette, Daniel Kuppitz) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (1 -- David Brown) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Ted Wilmes

TinkerPop 3.1 code freeze lifted

Hello, I'll be announcing the 3.1.4 release tomorrow morning but in the meantime, the code freeze is lifted on the tp31 branch and 3.1.5-SNAPSHOT jars and docs have been published. Thanks, Ted

TinkerPop 3.1.4 Released: A 187 On The Undercover Gremlinz

Hello, TinkerPop 3.1.4 has just been released. This maintenance release contains a number of bug fixes on the "Undercover Gremlinz" release line and should be non-breaking for your upgrade needs. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.lua/tinkerpo

Re: SQL-Gremlin logo?

I do not have one so that'd be awesome if you made one. Thanks for the offer. --Ted On Tue, Sep 13, 2016, 7:07 PM Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hi, > > I’ve been tweaking up our providers.html page: > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/providers.html < > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/providers.html> > > @Te

Re: SQL-Gremlin logo?

t; providers.html page. Any tweaks on the logo or “bio”, please advise. > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/providers.html > > Thanks, > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > On Sep 13, 2016, at 8:14 PM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > I do not have one so that'd b

Re: SQL-Gremlin logo?

Glorious, thanks Marko. --Ted On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hey Ted, > > Here you go. > > Enjoy, > Marko. > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > On Sep 14, 2016, at 7:14 PM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > > The logo looks great

Re: Store and Aggregate

I like the idea of deprecating aggregate and combining barrier with store to get the same behavior, but the flipped version makes more sense to me "store().barrier()" when running in OLTP mode. gremlin> g.V().out().aggregate('x').limit(1).cap('x') ==>[v[3],v[3],v[3],v[2],v[4],v[5]] gremlin> g.V().

Re: When do we release TinkerPop 3.2.3?

That sounds good to me and unless someone else wants to take the reigns on 3.1.5, I can take a crack at it again. The formatting snafu in the 3.1.4 change log has been haunting my dreams since last release so I'd like to get it nailed this time. --Ted On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Stephen Mal

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.3.0 Branching strategy

That sounds like a good and reasonable plan to me. --Ted On Sat, Oct 1, 2016, 6:10 AM Stephen Mallette wrote: > As we are now firming up 3.2.3/3.1.5 I think we can look to move forward on > creating the tp32 branch. I will set that up the weekend that we start code > freeze. I'll also take a mo

Re: [DISCUSS] Test Suite Changes for 3.3.0

Adding coverage to gremlin-benchmark sounds good to me. If we come up with any other dev specific tooling that we'd like to add, maybe it would make sense to just rename gremlin-benchmark to something like gremlin-tools or gremlin-dev. --Ted On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Stephen Mallette wrot

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-2290) Javascript GLV connection refused error handling

Ted Wilmes created TINKERPOP-2290: - Summary: Javascript GLV connection refused error handling Key: TINKERPOP-2290 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2290 Project: TinkerPop

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1810) Add Lambda.binaryOperator and Lambda.unaryOperator

Ted Wilmes created TINKERPOP-1810: - Summary: Add Lambda.binaryOperator and Lambda.unaryOperator Key: TINKERPOP-1810 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1810 Project: TinkerPop

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1925) Don't apply PathRetractionStrategy recursively

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Wilmes reassigned TINKERPOP-1925: - Assignee: Ted Wilmes > Don't apply PathRetractionStrategy rec

  1   2   >