Re: Proposal to Use LucidChart

That’s a great idea, Robbie.  Asher, could you reach out to them (https://www.lucidchart.com/pages/contact/get-a-quote)? On Mar 19, 2021, 3:48 PM -0400, Robert Vehse , wrote: > I find it hard to tell how useful the software can be for us. > > We could ask them whether they would consider a free

Re: NetworkRedux hosting going away

forward > > > > > cocoaforge to github. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think 1-4 are the most important. > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 2:10 PM Mathuaerknedam ! > > > > > > wrote: >

Re: NetworkRedux hosting going away

right way to backup a DB. :) Who can help > with this? > > I'm not sure what the "full backup" is, but it's often a backup of cpanel > data, which isn't so useful for anyone that has done things from the command > line. > > > > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at

Re: NetworkRedux hosting going away

; > > Jordan > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 1:29 AM Asher Haig wrote: > > > > > What if we just made an Xtras repo and let people make pull requests? > > > > > > > > > > Asher > > > > >

Re: NetworkRedux hosting going away

The majority of extant resources can be handled through GitHub easily.  They provide free web hosting, and we’re not doing anything fancy with the current adium.im site. I’m not sure what adiumxtras’ needs are, though. Best regards, Evan Evan D. Schoenberg, M.D. Cataract, Cornea, and Vision

Re: Adium Website needs an update

Thanks, Eric. I’ve added that PSD to the folder I linked below as well as to the full ZIP archive within that folder. -Evan > On Jul 2, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Eric Richie wrote: > > That's from the last email I have from Adam. > > -Eric > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:

Re: Adium Website needs an update

The highest resolution images I have are at: https://adium.im/images/adiumy/ There is definitely not an SVG version; Adam Betts never shared a vector file publicly, and one may not have existed at all. -Evan > On Jun 16, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Eric Richie wrote: > > I do have the .psd files from

Introduction: Asher Haig (Asher-)

I’d like to introduce to you all my cousin Asher Haig. He is one of Adium’s longest-term and heaviest users. I’ll never forget redesigning the Events system with his help while visiting him in Berlin over Spring Break circa 2004. He has a PhD in artificial intelligence, and is a skilled

Re: Releasing 1.5.10.5 to fix Catalina auto-scrolling

I’ll try to help with getting the release together. Hg isn’t letting me update, though remote: h...@hg.adium.im: Permission denied (publickey). I can still log into duck.adium.im; anyone with access there can see my current public key which is tagged with evands@Zernike.local. in

Re: Build is working on Muscovy with modern codesigning

Thijs, Is there anything else you need help with to release 1.5.10.3 and have an AIM and security stable build available? -Evan > On Apr 3, 2017, at 7:54 PM, Evan Schoenberg <tek...@gmail.com> wrote: > > By releasing 1.5.10.3, I suggest. > > Best regards, > Evan >

Re: Build is working on Muscovy with modern codesigning

By releasing 1.5.10.3, I suggest. Best regards, Evan On Apr 3, 2017, 3:33 PM -0400, Robert Vehse , wrote: > Hi, > > https://trac.adium.im/ticket/17097#comment:8 reports AIM as broken with > 1.5.10.2. > > How do we proceed? > > Cheers, > Robbie >

Re: Unique users over time

No, 2% of the current user base. Approximately 100 people make use of the affected part of Adium. Best regards, Evan On Mar 25, 2017, 8:25 AM -0400, Robert Vehse , wrote: > Hi Evan, > > 2% of the user base Adium once had? > > -Robbie >

Unique users over time

Discussion with Thijs today regarding the # of users affected by this libpurple issue under discussion — it’s less than 2% per Sparkle stats — left me curious. This is a graph of Sparkle’s sum unique user data per week with the X-axis displayed as year-week#. select week,SUM(d.num) from data d

Build is working on Muscovy with modern codesigning

I suggest a beta of 10.5.10.3 be built and distributed at least for a couple days. Then the changes between 10.5.10.2 and 10.5.10.3 should be applied to 10.5.11 and that finalized if possible… but we should make the minimum move to address the current need first. -Evan

Re: New Adium release for continued AIM support – updated certificate needed

> > On Mar 23, 2017, at 1:49 PM, Chris Forsythe wrote: > > Are all settings between the two the same? They seemed to be. After doing a clean repository checkout, it seems to be resolved. It was an odd error. -Evan

Re: New Adium release for continued AIM support – updated certificate needed

e Info.plist > files are missing a CFBundleExecutable key (which needs to be set to the > binary inside the framework). We may also need to sign the frameworks one by > one. > > Thijs > > >> On 23 mrt. 2017, at 18:08, Evan Schoenberg <tek...@gmail.com> wrote: &

Re: New Adium release for continued AIM support – updated certificate needed

Had a little time this morning. I have generated the new cert. I'm fighting with our frameworks now (signing now has to include each contained bundle, but as-is frameworks were failing to sign). Separately, I can compile on my 10.12 machine but not on Muscovy... it is throwing errors about

Re: New Adium release for continued AIM support – updated certificate needed

0. I have renewed our Apple Developer Membership. Once processed I should be able to generate new signing certificates. 1. Pulling adium-1.510.3, I couldn’t compile because of a failure to link to libcrypto. Oddly, I note that while https://hg.adium.im/adium/rev/0a0f0222bdd4 supposedly

Re: Access to HG and other Adium servers

OK that is a clever hijaack. I did *NOT* paste the wrong public key. Before changing any keys, please contact me out of band via a text message to my cell phone. -Evan > On Mar 20, 2017, at 8:49 PM, Evan Schoenberg <e...@adium.im> wrote: > > WOAH NO. > >> On Mar 20

Re: Access to HG and other Adium servers

WOAH NO. > On Mar 20, 2017, at 8:48 PM, Evan Schoenberg <e...@adium.im> wrote: > > Sorry I pasted the wrong key. This is the correct one, please use it instead: > > ssh-dss > B3NzaC1kc3MAAACBAPwMU/X5AXEwshEStOfMNUMd3l/R3I/ktgdQhq69W7lv9pz9PUE3NiQlW

Re: Access to HG and other Adium servers

Sorry I pasted the wrong key. This is the correct one, please use it instead: ssh-dss

Access to HG and other Adium servers

The deprecation of certain older keys in the current version of OS X means that my historical access rights to Adium servers no longer work. Could someone with access please add my current my pub key everywhere, particularly eider.adium.im and to the hg keylist: ssh-dss

Re: New Adium release for continued AIM support – updated certificate needed

I can try to help. It looks like next release should be 1.5.11. Is https://hg.adium.im/adium/rev/307f53385811 the tip of that? I don’t see a libpurple commit yet. Is that still pending? -Evan > On Mar 20, 2017, at 4:28 PM, Robert Vehse wrote: > > Hi everyone, >

Re: [#422021] Upcoming CentOS and Ubuntu Update : eider.adiumx.com

I am not involved in server maintenance and do not know the status of this. Can someone reply to Sindhu please? Best regards, Evan On Mar 1, 2017, 6:19 AM -0500, supp...@networkredux.com, wrote: > Hi Evan, > > Please let us know if you have completed the configurations, so that we can >

Fwd: Re: [#422021] Upcoming CentOS and Ubuntu Update : eider.adiumx.com

-- Forwarded message -- From: supp...@networkredux.com Date: Feb 9, 2017, 6:49 AM -0500 To: Evan Schoenberg <e...@adium.im> Subject: Re: [#422021] Upcoming CentOS and Ubuntu Update : eider.adiumx.com > Hi Evan, > > We have completed the migration and up

Re: Adium has a v1 code signing signature

bertve...@fastmail.fm >>> <mailto:robertve...@fastmail.fm>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Adrian, you perhaps? >>> >>> >>>> Am 07.09.2016 um 04:31 schrieb Evan Schoenberg <e...@adium.im >>>> <mailto:e...@adium.im>&

Re: Adium has a v1 code signing signature

Muscovy has now been updated to OS X 10.11. Who controls the email address ‘ad...@imfreemdom.org’? That’s the Apple ID in use there, and the password is needed to run the App Store updates including updating Xcode. I’m not familiar with the automatic build system — I’ve done the part I can

Re: Adium has a v1 code signing signature

Muscovy is a late 2009 Mac Mini Core 2 Duo which supports 10.11. https://github.com/munki/createOSXinstallPkg appears to allow setting up a no-intervention upgrade installation. I don’t have experience with it — does anyone on the list, with this or any other approach for upgrading OS X on a

Re: Certificate expired

I'm not involved in it at all, and I thought it had already been addressed... See other posts on the mailing list? -Evan Evan D. Schoenberg, M.D. Georgia Eye Partners Cornea, Refractive, and Cataract Surgeon On Aug 19, 2016, 6:47 PM -0400, Robert Vehse , wrote: >

Re: Certificate expired

This is being addressed. Thanks for your email. -Evan > On Aug 13, 2016, at 9:51 AM, Lutz Horn wrote: > > Hi, > > the certificate you use on https://adium.im/ expired on 2016-06-25. > Could you please renew it? > > Regards > > Lutz > -- > https://www.lhorn.de/ >

Fwd: New Developer Alert for Adium

Not sure if this is at all relevant but Facebook saw fit to tell me about it… Best, Evan > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Facebook" <notification+f_09j...@facebookmail.com> > Subject: New Developer Alert for Adium > Date: June 21, 2016 at 7:10:53 PM

Re: IM Freedom Board Elections

Sean, Your emails 6/8 and 6/13 did go through, which I confirmed via Mailman’s archive (http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/2016-June/thread.html). Oddly, I didn’t see Chris’s reply which is archived there, as well (http://adium.im/pipermail/devel_adium.im/2016-June/009361.html), which

Fwd: New Developer Alert for Adium

_ From: Facebook notification+f_09j...@facebookmail.com Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 3:44 PM Subject: New Developer Alert for Adium To: Evan Schoenberg tek...@gmail.com Facebook Hi Evan, This is a follow up to the Dev Alert sent

Bounty source and #413

Ok, we have bandied this about a number of times and a number of ways, but #413's recent bounty and near-immediate uptake by a coder inspired me. Let's pick 5 large and 5 medium size tickets. As a starting point we'll put $200 on bounty source on large tickets and $50 on medium tickets. The

Re: Updating Muscovy to 10.7

Evan. Sent from my iPhone On May 16, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Evan Schoenberg e...@adium.im wrote: Agreed. I would however like to have access to a share 10.6 testing device; smew is useless to us on 10.5. -Evan On May 16, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Colin Barrett co...@springsandstruts.com

Re: Updating Muscovy to 10.7

Agreed. I would however like to have access to a share 10.6 testing device; smew is useless to us on 10.5. -Evan On May 16, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Colin Barrett co...@springsandstruts.com wrote: Not up to date on what y'all have tried but switching to 10.6 seems like an absolute last resort.

Re: Adium 1.5.1

On May 12, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Eric Richie e...@adium.im wrote: On May 12, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Robert Vehse wrote: Am 12.05.2012 um 00:59 schrieb Evan D. Schoenberg, M.D.: Where should 1.5.1 be built from? I see that trunk currently reports as 1.6hg. I suggested a changeset to

Re: Adium 1.5.1

On May 7, 2012, at 1:38 PM, Eric Richie e...@adium.im wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Evan Schoenberg e...@adium.im wrote: libpurple has been updated to 2.10.4 with 2 security fixes, and I'd also like to have us distributing a Developer ID signed binary. We may need to include some

Re: 1.5 Release

On Mar 14, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Eric Richie wrote: A short time ago I built and posted 1.5 on cachefly. Before we officially announce it, there are a few remaining tasks to take care of. 1. Appcast (I have this committed locally and ready to go) The change log in HEAD has (X/X/2011) as the

Re: libpurple.framework and SSL Support

You need to call those 2 init functions I mentioned, after libpurple is initialized by your calls to init the core and other modules. That's why I suggested searching for them; you'll want to work backwards from where they're called in Adium's source to look at the overall initialization flow

Re: libpurple.framework and SSL Support

Great. Happy to help! No stupid questions; just stupid people. They were fine questions; Adium has a huge code base holding tons of knowledge that isn't always immediately evident if you don't know where to look. -Evan On Mar 7, 2012, at 3:13 AM, John Indra i.j...@me.com wrote: All,

Re: reCAPTCHA on adiumxtras.com

On Mar 1, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Thijs Alkemade wrote: Hey all, I've added reCAPTCHA on adiumxtras.com. I was getting pretty tired of the spam, so lets see if this helps. Currently, one needs to solve the captcha for every comment (and only for posting, not for registering). I think this is

Re: Icon update proposal

Either silhouette looks good to me; I agree with Peter that the Adiumy silhouette isn't immediately obvious inside the bubble, so the person might be a better choice.I like the new one (on the right).-EvanOn Feb 28, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Robert Vehse wrote:Some more choices to make, opinions to

Re: Status: 1.5

On Feb 25, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Eric Richie wrote: Has anyone looked into what it would take for us the have an Apple ID that we could sign the release with for Gatekeeper compatibility? If it's something we can do easily, it might be a nice touch to top off the 1.5 release. Is the build

Re: Icon update proposal

Agreed with Eric I didn't mean we need MOAR DUCK just that I don't like it don't like it being phased out. I think its use as generic person outline is great. The attention icon for example is too much, however. -Evan On Feb 26, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Eric Richie e...@adium.im wrote: As a

Re: Status: 1.5

My only 'objection' is that I'm out of town and will therefore miss the party... but I've missed the majority of the 1.5 development party, so that definitely shouldn't stop anyone :) Great work, everyone, on getting to this point! Here's to a smooth release. -Evan On Feb 23, 2012, at 9:08

Re: Icon update proposal

On Feb 19, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Robert Vehse wrote: I always thought the whole point of this vote was to get an idea which of the three sets was the most accepted allowing us to go with a particular set and to then work out the issues we have with this set with its author. Choosing each

Re: RIP Co-tweet

you to discuss your needs. -Eric On Feb 18, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Evan Schoenberg wrote: Was co-tweet useful? Is the paid service as good and reasonably priced? The project can certainly support paying for needed resources. -Evan On Feb 18, 2012, at 7:17 PM, Eric Richie e

Re: RIP Co-tweet

On the other hand, the comments on their blog post suggest pricing starting at $7000/year. Maybe alternatives are a better direction to investigate :) -Evan On Feb 18, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Evan Schoenberg e...@adium.im wrote: They might even donate an account to a deserving open source team

Re: Twitter: To be or not to be!

On Feb 10, 2012, at 8:13 PM, Peter Hosey wrote: On Feb 10, 2012, at 18:10:01, Colin Barrett wrote: Maybe International instead of Regional? (Less negative.) Neither one is really accurate, since they apply equally to several of the core services (e.g., ICQ's popularity in Russia and

Re: Twitter: To be or not to be!

On Feb 7, 2012, at 10:08 PM, Eric Richie wrote: On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:44 PM, George Lambrou wrote: -1. We shouldn't advocate things Adium's not good at. Twitter support is fairly basic at the moment, and we don't want users to expect fantastic Twitter support, not get it, and then hate

Re: Twitter: To be or not to be!

On Feb 7, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Christopher Forsythe wrote: That list is getting pretty long, maybe there's a better way to group them up front other than just a straight up list? Social Networking for instance for twitter and facebook. Here's my proposed reorganization. My goal with this

Re: Adium 1.5

On Jan 2, 2012, at 9:28 PM, Eric Richie wrote: Hey guys, I hope everyone had a happy (and safe) holiday and that you are all doing well. With the coming of the new year, it's about time we had a meeting to discuss the plans for releasing 1.5. We're VERY close

Moving Adium domains away from godaddy

Just a quick note: Two of our domains, adium.org and adiumxtras.com, were registered via a godaddy account. In response to godaddy's support of SOPA, I am transferring those domains to gandi.net. Like many registrars, gandi.new is donating $1 to the EFF for every transfer done; we've been

Re: Moving Adium domains away from godaddy

I've posted to the blog regarding this. http://adium.im/blog/2012/01/internet-freedom-sopa-and-godaddy/ -Evan On Jan 1, 2012, at 7:49 PM, Eric Richie wrote: Most excellent! -Eric On Jan 1, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. wrote: Just a quick note: Two of our domains, adium.org

Re: 1.4.4b1

Thanks, Eric! :) -Evan On Oct 31, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Eric Richie wrote: Forgot to update this thread... For those who didn't see it, I released 1.4.4b1 on Saturday. -Eric On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Robert Vehse robert.ve...@freenet.de wrote: Hey folks, as Matthew suggested,

Re: Adium 1.5b1 Released

Came through for me - and I concur! -Evan On Oct 22, 2011, at 6:59 PM, David Smith catfish@gmail.com wrote: (Apparently Google Groups digests mangled my emoji. For those wondering what on earth I meant, that's a thumbs up, a grin, and an exclamation point) David On Oct 22,

Re: A Proposal for Adium Next: The Main Window

and funner things :) -Evan On Aug 25, 2011, at 11:46 PM, George Lambrou wrote: I can't sleep until I clear this up. Sorry to bump. On Aug 25, 11, at 9.27 pm, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. wrote: I like moving the active chat's name into a sub-toolbar indicator. Evan, that's just the header

Re: Branching 1.5

On Sep 6, 2011, at 6:47 PM, Eric Richie wrote: Now that we've got 1.4.3 out the door, I think it's time we go ahead and branch 1.5. Any objections? Regardless of the release plan, I do not think we should branch 1.5. I think that feature branches should be made as needed, and a single

Re: Branching 1.5

On Sep 6, 2011, at 7:01 PM, David Smith wrote: I disagree. The concept of trunk focuses testing a lot. I know when we had a few feature branches going I immediately set up my own branch that I merged them all to so I could test more than one thing at once. Branch early, merge early may be a

Re: Adium 1.4.3

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 21:06, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. eva...@dreskin.netwrote: On Aug 28, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Nuno Sénica wrote: Hi Evan, The crash has occurred once or twice in the nightly build and it is usually some minutes after waking up. On the next crash I'll update the ticket

Re: Adium 1.4.3

On Aug 28, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: Only thing remaining is the AIProxyObject-bug that seems to remain for some of us (IIRC it was Adrian who still encountered the crash). The ticket is closed, and nobody has commented there with a reproduction of the crash. -Evan But

Re: Adium 1.4.3

On Aug 28, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Matthew wrote: Someone on IRC questioned whether the Lion overlay scrollbars should be in 1.4.3 (they were introduced in rc1). I don't necessarily see the scrollbars as a problem, but the mention/focus marks are now so small as to appear missing. It gets even

Re: Adium 1.4.3

Regards, Nuno On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 20:43, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. eva...@dreskin.net wrote: On Aug 28, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: Only thing remaining is the AIProxyObject-bug that seems to remain for some of us (IIRC it was Adrian who still encountered the crash

Re: A Proposal for Adium Next: The Main Window

On Aug 25, 2011, at 7:54 PM, Peter Hosey wrote: On Aug 25, 2011, at 16:53:55, Zachary West wrote: I wonder how badly received combining the contact list and message window would be received. Somewhere between torches+pitchforks and victory gardens+fallout shelters. Adium's a

Re: A Proposal for Adium Next: The Main Window

There is a lot to love about this proposal. Great work, George, and thank you for putting it together so professionally. The following is fantastic, beautifully considered, and well mocked up: - Title bar removal. Yes yes yes. I like moving the active chat's name into a sub-toolbar indicator.

Re: adium-1.4 3614:062a27e5858b: Added MAZeroingWeakRef

On Aug 21, 2011, at 7:23 PM, Thijs Alkemade wrote: On 21 aug. 2011, at 23:47, comm...@adium.im wrote: details: http://hg.adium.im/adium-1.4/rev/062a27e5858b revision:3614:062a27e5858b branch: (none) author: Evan Schoenberg date:Sun Aug

Re: IRC Developer Meeting - August 17, 2011

Got home a little while ago. Thanks for posting the log. Would have made it tonight if I hadn't gotten stuck at the hospital; I won't be free during business hours CST on Aug 30th so won't make it then, either. I do agree with shifting around the convenience factor for different time zones

Re: Concerning internalObjectID...

On Aug 16, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Colin Barrett wrote: So we have - (username, hostname) which won't change without sign off / sign on, but doesn't uniquely identify a user, and - nick, which can change without sign off / sign on, but does uniquely identify a user Essentially we should

Re: Prefs Reduction wiki page

I think that simply having the preference, defaulted to on, is valuable guidance that automatic update checking is available. I don't think its presence is clutter nor confusing. Furthermore, relying upon a checkbox in the automatic update notification window means that we are forcing a single

Re: Concerning internalObjectID...

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Nicholas Peshek kb...@mac.com wrote: Every time I go through the source code I find places where we are using internalObjectID to verify an if an object is unique (We use [NSDictionary objectForKey:listObject.internalObjectID] in several places). This concerns

Re: Annual Fundraiser

On Jul 28, 2011, at 6:06 AM, Mike Houben m...@crazyhstudio.net wrote: Greetings everyone, we just talked on the IRC to initiate a Fundraiser like Wikipedia does. So we can move some of our biggest missings Features a bit forward and help out the Rest. A concrete plan of what to do

Re: Kickstarter for AV

On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Colin Barrett wrote: What, specifically, would the funds be used for? I think right now we have a bunch of funds that are not being used for much of anything. Raising money is not a goal in and of itself and it's not a marketing thing either. It is a means

Re: Adium 1.4.3

On Jul 30, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Robert Vehse wrote: Thijs just reminded me that b1 didn't get `make localizable-strings`ed so for example Facebook strings haven't been translated yet. I think is another good reasons to release 1.4.3b2 this weekend. Eric voiced his support for this.

Re: Time to start getting 1.5 ready for beta?

On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:03 PM, Colin Barrett wrote: Aren't we, in theory, supposed to be doing this already? At the very least the old plan should be the strawman proposal we begin with, considering how long we spent hashing it all out. Hear, hear. :) -Evan -Colin (via thumbs)

Re: 'Adium - About' international

On Jul 11, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Robert Vehse wrote: Am 11.07.2011 um 18:15 schrieb Mike Houben: You find the Mercurial Repo here: http://hg.adium.im/www/adium.im/ You can make a Patch and send it to the Mailinglist. The person with write permission will apply the patch in your name.

FYI: MacWorld review of iChat 6.0

Glowing review of Adium disguised as a review of iChat. :) http://www.macworld.com/article/161294/2011/07/ichat6.html -Evan

Re: Infra upgrade proposal (with patch!): Multiple nightlies

Colin, Still planning on making these changes? Seems like you've done most of the heavy lifting already :) -Evan On May 7, 2011, at 7:45 PM, Zachary West wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 15:40, Colin Barrett co...@springsandstruts.com wrote: How it works: buildbot has an array of

Re: Proposal: Messages Window Update

On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:54 AM, David Smith wrote: Let's go with Lion-inspired icons instead ;) /intense-bias Using Lion now, and I completely agree that Adium looks out of place on the system with the old-style icons in our toolbars. -Evan

Re: Proposal: Messages Window Update

On Jul 10, 2011, at 2:12 PM, George Lambrou wrote: I've been working on something for Lion, and it's almost done; should I post it here when I call it 'finished'? Please do :) -Evan George Lambrou On Jul 10, 11, at 3.09 pm, Evan Schoenberg wrote: On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:54 AM

Re: A WWDC session worth watching...

On Jul 2, 2011, at 2:29 PM, David Smith wrote: …the Introducing App Sandbox session stars a very familiar app ;) Very nice. We should definitely be good citizens and implement this once we are legally able :) I think it's excellent that Apple has added the described functionality for apps

Re: Adium 1.4.3

On Jun 29, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Thijs Alkemade wrote: On 26 jun 2011, at 21:23, comm...@adium.im wrote: details: http://hg.adium.im/adium-1.4/rev/89e0195da5b0 revision:3555:89e0195da5b0 branch: (none) author: Evan Schoenberg date:Sun Jun 26

FYI: Facebook rep on the Great Disabling of June 2011

FYI, this is what I ultimately got. -Evan On Jun 28, 2011, at 12:16 PM, The Facebook Team wrote: In general, apps which are in development mode can be evaluated by our automated system if not utilizing our test network. Often times, the testing mechanics, such as installing, uninstalling,

Re: XMPP Facebook

No communication. I am also locked out of Facebook. It can't be resolved via mobile, and the hospital computers block FB. I may know more when I'm home this evening... -Evan On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Colin Barrett co...@springsandstruts.com wrote: While Evan was working on updating

Re: XMPP Facebook

they not heard of TinEye?) and then change your password. No information or communication after that about why or what happened though. -Colin On Jun 27, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Evan Schoenberg wrote: No communication. I am also locked out of Facebook. It can't be resolved via mobile

Re: XMPP Facebook

On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Colin Barrett wrote: While Evan was working on updating the code, he noticed this as well. After some digging, it appeared the application we had been using was disabled. So we registered it again. Further search of my spam folder shows an identical email

Re: XMPP Facebook

On Jun 27, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. wrote: On Jun 27, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Colin Barrett wrote: While Evan was working on updating the code, he noticed this as well. After some digging, it appeared the application we had been using was disabled. So we registered it again

Re: XMPP Facebook

On Jun 27, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Zachary West wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 18:05, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. eva...@dreskin.net wrote: You were. Hadn't had a chance to ping you about it yet; I hadn't added you as a developer yet because they now require it to be a 'fully verified' account

Re: XMPP Facebook

From Facebook: We appreciate your inquiry. Your app was temporarily disabled by our automated systems, but it seems to be up and running properly now. Sorry for the inconvenience. Here are some helpful policy resources: Platform Policies: https://developers.facebook.com/policy/

Re: Adium 1.4.3

On Jun 26, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Robert Vehse wrote: Am 26.06.2011 um 19:24 schrieb Evan Schoenberg, M.D.: I thought this through and decided that most Facebook users are pretty used to that login window by now, and it does say 'Log in to use your Facebook account with Adium.' in the window

Re: Adium 1.4.3

On Jun 26, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Robert Vehse wrote: That said, I'd be fine with having a more thorough explanation than 'Log in to use your Facebook account with Adium.' Can you suggest language that you would put in its place, preferably that would be applicable to both new and old users?

Re: Adium 1.4.3

On Jun 26, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Peter Hosey wrote: On Jun 26, 2011, at 12:03:05, Robert Vehse wrote: Am 26.06.2011 um 20:59 schrieb Christopher Forsythe: Is your end goal here to just inform users that something is going on, or what? That'll better help to pick the one to use. Pretty much,

Re: adium-1.4 3529:571c527ae057: Remove old PurpleFacebookAccountVie...

On Jun 26, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Thijs Alkemade wrote: On 25 jun 2011, at 00:04, comm...@adium.im wrote: details: http://hg.adium.im/adium-1.4/rev/9e53b161122a revision:3533:9e53b161122a branch: facebook-xmpp author: Evan Schoenberg date:Fri

Re: 1.4 and Trunk builds busted

On Jun 26, 2011, at 6:32 PM, Robert Vehse wrote: Hi folks, I'm getting build failures on both Trunk and the 1.4 line. For 1.4, tip (http://hg.adium.im/adium-1.4/rev/89e0195da5b0) appears to be the culprit: /Users/robertvehse/adium-1.4/Plugins/Purple

Re: facebook-xmpp merged into adium-1.4

On Jun 24, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. wrote: Could someone please figure out how to transplant the changes into the adium repository? Thanks. OK, I spent an hour looking into this this morning. As far as I can tell, the only way to do this is to manually transplant each commit

Re: facebook-xmpp merged into adium-1.4

On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Thijs Alkemade wrote: On 25 jun 2011, at 16:04, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. wrote: On Jun 24, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. wrote: Could someone please figure out how to transplant the changes into the adium repository? Thanks. OK, I spent an hour

Re: facebook-xmpp merged into adium-1.4

On Jun 25, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Augie Fackler wrote: Just saw this thread, and FWIW that looks like the right transplant spell to me. If it gives you trouble, #mercurial on freenode can probably help, and I'll take a shot at it if you put me on the To or CC line in a follow up to this

Adium 1.4.3

This weekend, I've merged facebook-xmpp, applied the fix for the Twitter contact list not loading, downgraded us to MSNp15, and worked around the AIM client-login via proxy issue. As far as I'm aware, that means that we've hit all the major points that need to be addressed for Adium 1.4.3.

Re: AIM client_login

On Jun 11, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Eric Richie e...@adium.im wrote: On Jun 11, 2011, at 12:34 PM, John Bailey wrote: On 06/11/2011 11:06 AM, Eric Richie wrote: It's always something... I'd really prefer that we had an actual fix if at all possible. I don't want to see us get into a

AIM client_login

So http://trac.adium.im/ticket/15137 is caused by client_login and the user's proxy configuration not working nicely together which led me to wonder why we were using client_login at all. changeset: 3869:e9f94c290817 user:Thijs Alkemade thijsalkem...@gmail.com date:Sun

  1   2   >