links to koji builds in src.fp.o

I recently noticed that the commit list in dist-git shows the number of successful/failed/cancelled builds from a given commit [e.g. 1,2]. I haven't seen this announced, but this is super cool and useful! A thousand thanks to whoever made this happen. Zbyszek [1]

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 17:33 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova a écrit : > My point was to highlight that ELN is not a "stable edition" like > Fedora Server. ELN is Rawhide, its quality is no better than Rawhide > quality, its stability is Rawhide stability, its target audience is > Rawhide

Re: F32 selinux denials

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:49 PM Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > Hello, > > I upgraded to F32 yesterday and everything seems to have gone > smoothly except I'm getting many selinux denials (I'm in permissive so > functionality is ok at the moment). What should I report them against? > I've done a

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 18:45, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Indeed, she recommended that the ideal situation is for us to avoid conditionals where possible and instead use Recommends: for things that are not strict requirements. This would benefit Fedora as well, since people could trim their installs down to

Re: F32 selinux denials

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 09:48:05 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > Hello, > > I upgraded to F32 yesterday and everything seems to have gone > smoothly except I'm getting many selinux denials (I'm in permissive so > functionality is ok at the moment). What should I report them against? > I've

Fedora 32 compose report: 20200325.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-32-20200324.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200325.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 43 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 23.29 MiB Size of dropped packages:439.92 KiB

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 14:19 -0400, Neal Gompa a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:16 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > > On 25. 03. 20 19:10, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > In general, very few packages should even need conditionalizing > > > at > > > all; that's why I've been saying that this

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 17:33, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: I consider rawhide users our users and I assume many other do consider them our users as well. I consider upstream projects who run their CI on Fedora our users. You are not incorrect that this is a terminology issue, however I think this is a

Fedora-IoT-32-20200325.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200324.0): ID: 556495 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/556495 ID: 556496 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:00 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 17:33 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova a écrit : > > > My point was to highlight that ELN is not a "stable edition" like > > Fedora Server. ELN is Rawhide, its quality is no better than Rawhide > > quality,

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 19:19, Neal Gompa wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:16 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 25. 03. 20 19:10, Stephen Gallagher wrote: In general, very few packages should even need conditionalizing at all; that's why I've been saying that this discussion is premature. Most of the Python

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Dne 25. 03. 20 v 18:06 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 25. 03. 20 v 17:33 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a): >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> On 25. 03. 20 14:06, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: >> By contributing to Fedora Rawhide sources and consuming them as ELN >>

Re: F32 selinux denials

On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 18:17 +0100, Zdenek Pytela wrote: > > > SELinux is preventing pcscd from using the sys_nice capability. > > > > SELinux is preventing accounts-daemon from using the sys_nice > > capability. > > > Denials like this are under investigation, most likely they are harmless >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:32 PM David Tardon wrote: ... > And yes, it means that people are going to be _bothered_, and > > _pressured_ on figuring out the best way to collaborate. But isn't it > > our job? > > No, that's not what your proposal implies. Instead, people are going to > be bothered

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, at 1:18 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 25. 03. 20 v 18:06 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 25. 03. 20 v 17:33 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a): > >> [snip] > >> We can come up with guidelines, for example: > >> > >> 1) Try to find a way to resolve the issue without any

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 2:16 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 03. 20 19:10, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > In general, very few packages should even need conditionalizing at > > all; that's why I've been saying that this discussion is premature. > > Most of the Python packages we maintain in RHEL

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 03. 20 14:06, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >>> By contributing to Fedora Rawhide sources and consuming them as ELN > >>> repositories for testing purposes. > >> > >> The change proposal literally says "There is no user-facing part in

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Dne 25. 03. 20 v 17:33 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a): > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:10 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 25. 03. 20 14:06, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > By contributing to Fedora Rawhide sources and consuming them as ELN > repositories for testing purposes. The change

Re: F32 selinux denials

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:30 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 18:17 +0100, Zdenek Pytela wrote: > > > > > SELinux is preventing pcscd from using the sys_nice capability. > > > > > > SELinux is preventing accounts-daemon from using the sys_nice > > > capability. > > > > > Denials

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 19:10, Stephen Gallagher wrote: In general, very few packages should even need conditionalizing at all; that's why I've been saying that this discussion is premature. Most of the Python packages we maintain in RHEL would need conditionalizing to disable (part of) tests or docs.

Fedora-32-20200325.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200324.n.0): ID: 556197 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/556197 ID: 556260 Test: x86_64

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Neal Gompa writes: > Miro Hrončok wrote: >> Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >>> In general, very few packages should even need conditionalizing at >>> all; that's why I've been saying that this discussion is premature. >> >> Most of the Python packages we maintain in RHEL would need

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 13:09 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:48 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > > On 25. 03. 20 12:37, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > So let's assume for the sake of the argument, that Python is > > > > broken in ELN and > > > > the Python maintainers

Re: Help needed to get dependencies in EPEL 8 for pagure

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:41 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 9:59 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I've been trying to get Pagure into EPEL 8 for a couple of months now > > > so that we can upgrade

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2020-03-26 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2020-03-26 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2020-03-26 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2020-03-26

Pinging spin or labs maintainers in failed composes tickets

Hi all, As discussed in the spins list [1], we are adding the ability to ping maintainers of spins or labs in compose failure tickets [2]. I made a list of maintainers [3] from the existing kickstart files, please create PR's to fedora-kickstarts repo [4] if any changes are needed to the list.

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:00 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 17:33 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova a écrit : > > > My point was to highlight that ELN is not a "stable edition" like > > Fedora Server. ELN is Rawhide, its quality is no better than Rawhide > > quality,

Coq build issues in F32

I've been talking to Richard Jones about this privately, and he suggested that a message to fedora-devel could be helpful. I've been talking for weeks about updating the entire coq stack, badgering people into swapping reviews with me, etc. Today I finally had all the bits in place to do the

Re: Pinging spin or labs maintainers in failed composes tickets

On 25. 03. 20 21:51, Mohan Boddu wrote: Hi all, As discussed in the spins list [1], we are adding the ability to ping maintainers of spins or labs in compose failure tickets [2]. I made a list of maintainers [3] from the existing kickstart files, please create PR's to fedora-kickstarts repo [4]

Re: Coq build issues in F32

Le Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:58:33 -0600, Jerry James a écrit : > Either I got lucky when I launched the Rawhide build, or something is > fundamentally different between F32 and Rawhide. Clearly something > nondeterministic is at work. I have been unable to reproduce this > failure in mock so far,

Re: Coq build issues in F32

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:57 PM Paul Dufresne via devel wrote: > ... yeah, I know, might have no link at all with your Coq build... I > don't know. Maybe ... but that sure is suspicious. I recall hearing that OpenJDK is also suffering from weird segfaults. H. Thanks for the input,

Re: Coq build issues in F32

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:58 PM Jerry James wrote: > Either I got lucky when I launched the Rawhide build, or something is > fundamentally different between F32 and Rawhide. Clearly something > nondeterministic is at work. I have been unable to reproduce this > failure in mock so far, but will

Re: Coq build issues in F32

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 9:24 PM Jerry James wrote: > You'll want to view this with a fixed-width font. Thank you, gmail, for completely destroying my formatting work. Oh well, you can probably tell what I was trying to do. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

Re: Slow boot on F32 Workstation

On 3/21/20 8:45 AM, Andreas Tunek wrote: I sidegraded my rawhide install to F32 a couple of weeks ago and from the start I noticed that booting F32 was really slow. I assumed this was some kind of bug or some devel stuff and would get solved. What did you upgrade from? There were Radeon

Coq build issues in F32

Hi Jerry! Long time no see. Jerry James writes: > I built the whole stack for Rawhide with no issues. Zero compiler warnings? No fiddling to suppress compiler warnings *anywhere* in the build chain (whether options or pragmas)? Not suggesting you go looking for pragmas (probably have 10

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:15 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 13:09 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova a écrit : > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:48 PM Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > As I mentioned in the previous mail, branching goes against the > > purpose of the effort. >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:23 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 03. 20 14:06, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >>> By contributing to Fedora Rawhide sources and consuming them as ELN > >>> repositories for testing purposes. > >> > >> The change proposal literally says "There is no user-facing part in

Re: GSoC 2020 | Improving Network Linux System Role

Hi Naman, Thank you for your interest. Please take a look at: https://github.com/linux-system-roles/network/wiki Thank you Till Am Mi., 25. März 2020 um 04:36 Uhr schrieb Naman Dhingra : > > Hello there, > Hope this email finds you well! > > This is in with reference to the project idea of

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Dne 25. 03. 20 v 11:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > On 25. 03. 20 10:26, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> I think that the level of involvement of the other maintainers is the >> same as what we always did for RHEL. Did RHEL maintainers bothered some >> Fedora maintainers with some conditionals and what not?

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > Hi, Miro, > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > On 25. 03. 20 12:49, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > > Going back to the questions. See comments inline. > > > > Thanks. > > > > >>> The goal of the ELN

F32 selinux denials

Hello, I upgraded to F32 yesterday and everything seems to have gone smoothly except I'm getting many selinux denials (I'm in permissive so functionality is ok at the moment). What should I report them against? I've done a relabel to try to resolve them. A sample of the most common: SELinux

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Starting a new sub-thread. On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:33 AM Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > As Ben is on PTO, I'd like to present the System-Wide Change > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose > > == Summary == > > The goal of the ELN project is to continuously build

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Nicolas Mailhot via devel writes: > Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 13:09 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova a écrit : >> Miro Hrončok wrote: >> >> As I mentioned in the previous mail, branching goes against the >> purpose of the effort. >> >> What we like to achieve is to create a continuous flow from

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 13:09 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:48 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > As I mentioned in the previous mail, branching goes against the > purpose of the effort. > > What we like to achieve is to create a continuous flow from Fedora >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:59:55 +0100 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 25. 03. 20 15:50, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >>> Branching means forking Fedora Rawhide into something else. Which > >>> eventually will lead to new downstream tree which will ignore the > >>> rest of Fedora and just use the fork instead.

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200325.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200324.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200325.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:21 Upgraded packages: 96 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 6.78 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:32:26AM +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > This includes: > > * buildroot configuration, rpm macro and compile flags, > * comps files and the compose content, > * compose itself and the pipeline which builds it. [...] The discussion so far was mostly about

[389-devel] Reminder: please review: PR 50959 - RFE - set db home directory to /dev/shm/dirsrv by default

On 3/16/20 12:48 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50959 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 15:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: == User Experience == There is no user-facing part in this change. No ELN artifacts are going to be shipped to the end-user. As a packager debugging a problem in ELN, how do I consume it? It is described in "How to Test" section. Those sections 

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 15:50, Fabio Valentini wrote: Branching means forking Fedora Rawhide into something else. Which eventually will lead to new downstream tree which will ignore the rest of Fedora and just use the fork instead. It can be done, but I think it will damage Fedora as a project. (snip)

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Dne 25. 03. 20 v 16:47 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > Starting a new sub-thread. > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:33 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: >> As Ben is on PTO, I'd like to present the System-Wide Change >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose >> >> ==

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:29 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> Will there be a way to opt-out packages (or stacks of them) from ELN if > >> they are > >> not interesting for RHEL? > > > > We want to start with a subset of packages at the beginning (basic > > buildroot packages, system-level packages

Fedora-IoT-33-20200325.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: Mount /run contents changed to 147.1454880% of previous size Used mem changed from 167 MiB to 145 MiB Peak

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Dne 25. 03. 20 v 15:02 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 02:06:59PM +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: >> Hi, Miro, >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> On 25. 03. 20 12:49, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: I think that not having eln-branch

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Hi, Miro, On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:28 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 03. 20 12:49, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > Going back to the questions. See comments inline. > > Thanks. > > >>> The goal of the ELN project is to continuously build Fedora Rawhide > >>> packages and composes in the way

Fedora-Rawhide-20200325.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 9/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200324.n.0): ID: 556027 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL:

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 07:19 -0700, Troy Dawson a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:15 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel > wrote: > > > > rpm state in EL prevents most downstreaming. Please focus efforts > > there. > > > > I don’t see how you will get any community adhesion in fixing > >

Re: Heads up: OpenSSL-1.1.1e coming to Rawhide

> The list of (likely) affected packages is growing: > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/affected-by/openssl-libs?epoch1=1=1.1.1d=7.fc33=1=1.1.1e=1.fc33=f33 It's a useful list! Thanks. Note rubygem-puma is added to the list too. -- Jun | He - His - Him

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Dne 25. 03. 20 v 15:19 Troy Dawson napsal(a): > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:15 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel > wrote: >> Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 13:09 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova a écrit : >>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:48 PM Miro Hrončok >>> wrote: >>> As I mentioned in the previous mail,

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 14:06, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: By contributing to Fedora Rawhide sources and consuming them as ELN repositories for testing purposes. The change proposal literally says "There is no user-facing part in this change. No ELN artifacts are going to be shipped to the end-user." As

Re: Intent to retire why

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 4:12 PM Jerry James wrote: > I announced last summer that I was going to retire the why package, > due to its upstream abandoning it, but then was able to keep it > working, so kept it for Fedora 31. I am just a handful of package > reviews away from updating coq and

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Dne 25. 03. 20 v 16:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 25. 03. 20 v 11:23 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): >> On 25. 03. 20 10:26, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> I think that the level of involvement of the other maintainers is the >>> same as what we always did for RHEL. Did RHEL maintainers bothered some >>>

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 16:47, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I think we managed to miss a few key points in the Change Proposal which is directly resulting in a bit of the confusion here. Reading the rest of you e-mail I must agree that this is what happened. Would you mind putting the change back to

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 12:49, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: Going back to the questions. See comments inline. Thanks. The goal of the ELN project is to continuously build Fedora Rawhide packages and composes in the way which resembles the CentOS and RHEL build process and to provide a feedback loop for

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Dne 24. 03. 20 v 19:55 Aleksandra Fedorova napsal(a): > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> On 24. 03. 20 16:23, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: >>> I am going to answer generally in this mail, before we dive in into >>> discussing the details. >>> >>> I think your approach to

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Dne 25. 03. 20 v 4:59 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:33 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: >> == Detailed Description == >> >> This Change supersedes the previously-approved [[Changes/Additional >> buildroot to test x86-64 micro-architecture update|Change]] to enable >> an

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 5:00 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:33 AM Aleksandra Fedorova > wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose > > > > I've finally had an opportunity to digest this change proposal, and > I've got some overall

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 07:55:12PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 5:25:30 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:13:57PM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > > I thought the above was saying there were fundamental architectural > > > differences in

Re: Heads up: OpenSSL-1.1.1e coming to Rawhide

On 24. 03. 20 13:22, Tomas Mraz wrote: Most probably we will revert this change in upstream 1.1.1 branch and I will update the rawhide build with the revert patch as well. Can this please happen rather sooner than later? The list of (likely) affected packages is growing:

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200325.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Self-introduction: chrissie

Hi, I'm Chrissie Caulfield, I've worked at Red Hat or over 15 years now, pretty much always in clustering. Before that I worked on VAX/VMS systems - more clustering, though I did have a spell in between when I wrote software-for-industry and was porting-supremo for Tarantella (back-end stuff

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 10:26, Vít Ondruch wrote: I think that the level of involvement of the other maintainers is the same as what we always did for RHEL. Did RHEL maintainers bothered some Fedora maintainers with some conditionals and what not? Probably. I don't see that should be different. The only

Re: [Rd] Plotmath on Fedora 31 broken with with pango >= 1.44 - workarounds?

Just for de...@lists.fp.o The problem reported in the previous email (enclosed below) not only happens because pango switched to HarfBuzz, but also because by default fontconfig prefers a PS font for symbols, so I'd say this is a system-wide problem. But not sure where's the proper place/package

Re: Self-introduction: chrissie

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 10:05:21AM +, Christine Caulfield wrote: > Hi, > > I'm Chrissie Caulfield, I've worked at Red Hat or over 15 years now, > pretty much always in clustering. Before that I worked on VAX/VMS > systems - more clustering, though I did have a spell in between when I > wrote

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:06:06AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 07:55:12PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 5:25:30 AM MST Petr Pisar wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:13:57PM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > > > I thought the above

Re: [Rd] Plotmath on Fedora 31 broken with with pango >= 1.44 - workarounds?

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 01:14, Gavin Simpson wrote: > > Dear list > > On Fedora 31 the pango library has recently updated to version >= 1.44 > and in doing so has switched to using the HarfBuzz library (from > FreeType) and dropped Adobe Type 1 font support. This causes problems > with plotmath as

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200325.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 24. 03. 20 19:55, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 24. 03. 20 16:23, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: I think your approach to assessment of the Change is not fair. Ouch. It's just that reading the proposal raises all of those questions. Sorry

Re: [Rd] Plotmath on Fedora 31 broken with with pango >= 1.44 - workarounds?

Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 11:28 +0100, Iñaki Ucar a écrit : > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 01:14, Gavin Simpson > wrote: Hi, > Adding de...@lists.fp.o to CC. A workaround is to avoid using PS > fonts for symbols. PS fonts are dead mid-term everywhere, and already forbidden in new Fedora font

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 11:47 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 24. 03. 20 19:55, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:01 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 24. 03. 20 16:23, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > >>> I think your approach to assessment of the Change is not fair. > >> > >>

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On 25. 03. 20 12:37, Fabio Valentini wrote: So let's assume for the sake of the argument, that Python is broken in ELN and the Python maintainers don't want 0%{?rhel}/0%{?eln} conditionals in their spec files. Now all 3600+ Python packages will fail to build in ELN because of this and the

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

Going back to the questions. See comments inline. On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:17 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 24. 03. 20 10:32, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > As Ben is on PTO, I'd like to present the System-Wide Change > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose > >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 25. 03. 20 12:37, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> So let's assume for the sake of the argument, that Python is broken in ELN > >> and > >> the Python maintainers don't want 0%{?rhel}/0%{?eln} conditionals in their > >> spec > >> files. Now

[EPEL-devel] Re: Default bookmarks under RHEL8

On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 21:32 +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 14:10, Dmitry Butskoy > > wrote: > > > > Could anybody answer please which package provides: > > > /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html > >

[Bug 1817204] New: perl-Search-Elasticsearch-6.80 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817204 Bug ID: 1817204 Summary: perl-Search-Elasticsearch-6.80 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Search-Elasticsearch Keywords:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Default bookmarks under RHEL8

Am 25.03.20 um 19:32 schrieb Dmitry Butskoy: Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 14:10, Dmitry Butskoy > wrote:     Could anybody answer please which package provides:     > /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html     under RHEL8 ? I don't see

[Bug 1661251] Fails due to uninitialised value

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661251 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |ppi...@redhat.com

[EPEL-devel] Default bookmarks under RHEL8

Could anybody answer please which package provides: /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html under RHEL8 ? ~buc ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Default bookmarks under RHEL8

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 14:10, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > Could anybody answer please which package provides: > > /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html > under RHEL8 ? > > I don't see anything providing it in EL8 > > ~buc > > ___ > epel-devel

[EPEL-devel] Re: Default bookmarks under RHEL8

Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 14:10, Dmitry Butskoy > wrote: Could anybody answer please which package provides: > /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html under RHEL8 ? I don't see anything providing it in EL8 Then I don't

Re: Help needed to get dependencies in EPEL 8 for pagure

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:41 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:57 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 9:59 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I've been trying to get Pagure into EPEL 8 for a couple of months now > > > so that we can upgrade

[389-devel] Reminder: please review: PR 50982 - Revise UI branding

On 3/24/20 12:14 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50982 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1815682] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20200320 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815682 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[389-devel] please review: PR 50983 - Fix memory leaks with indirect COS searches

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50983 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Pagure for EL8 (EPEL8)

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:42 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 11:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:16 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 05:37:16PM -0500, Neal

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-03-26 - 94% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/03/26/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.4-20200326gitde9f26a.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1814917] perl-Net-GitHub-0.99 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814917 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Net-GitHub-0.98 is |perl-Net-GitHub-0.99 is

[Bug 1817266] New: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback-0.101 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817266 Bug ID: 1817266 Summary: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback-0.101 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Callback Keywords:

[Bug 1817061] perl-Gnome2-Vte is missing in Fedora V32?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817061 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG

[Bug 1817061] New: perl-Gnome2-Vte is missing in Fedora V32?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1817061 Bug ID: 1817061 Summary: perl-Gnome2-Vte is missing in Fedora V32? Product: Fedora Version: 32 Status: NEW Component: perl-Gnome2-Vte Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

  1   2   >