I have 2 questions:
1. How to find which window has the focus?
2. How to find the window ID of my application?
Thanks!
=
__
Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:06:42AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III scrawled:
> > "DS" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DS> Probably, but in the 40 Dell Optiplex SX260s I just helped deploy
> DS> as a lab one and a half hours ago, we just reserved 8mb in the
> DS> BIOS, and it worked
> "DS" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> Probably, but in the 40 Dell Optiplex SX260s I just helped deploy
DS> as a lab one and a half hours ago, we just reserved 8mb in the
DS> BIOS, and it worked.
My two Dell C400 laptops (Intel i830m chipset) are stuck at 1MB. And
even if it
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> >I hear that discussion is the foundation of democracy and it seems that
> >devel list is getting quiet again ;)
> >
> >So another suggestion:
> >
> > Mike, what do you think about setting up a separate
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:54:04PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III scrawled:
> > "DS" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DS> There's also a BIOS option to do this early ...
>
> Many of the BIOS versions out there are buggy in that they will only
> reserve 1MB of video ram, necessitating
> "DS" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> There's also a BIOS option to do this early ...
Many of the BIOS versions out there are buggy in that they will only
reserve 1MB of video ram, necessitating that the OS or XFree reserve
additional memory via AGP at runtime.
- J<
___
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 11:51:53PM -0500, David Dawes scrawled:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:51:13AM -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
> >On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:51:10 -0500 (EST), Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >>
> >>One thing I don't understand about this is that this is an integrated
> >>graphics chipset,
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>I hear that discussion is the foundation of democracy and it seems that
>devel list is getting quiet again ;)
>
>So another suggestion:
>
> Mike, what do you think about setting up a separate (entire) tree
>someplace else like SF ?
I think it would
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Richard A. Hecker wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:19:29AM -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
>> >>After coming in to find 170-odd messages from the new [Devel] list in my
>> >>inbox, I decided to switch to digest mode. However, mailman tells me that
>> >>"the list administrator
On 15 Jan 2003, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> Mike, what do you think about setting up a separate (entire) tree
>> someplace else like SF ?
>>
>> The reason I am thinking about it is that it looks like I finally fixed
>> the problem that GATOS memory controller changes induced in DRI Mesa
>> driver.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:51:13AM -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:51:10 -0500 (EST), Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>>
>>One thing I don't understand about this is that this is an integrated
>>graphics chipset, right ? I.e. it uses part of system RAM for video RAM.
>>There is no code
Dear all,
I am trying to implement an Xv driver.
I came across this one function call StopVideo() and DESIGN doc says it is to indicate
that the driver should stop displaying the video.
I would like to know if the interface will only be trigger by an event like window
manager's moving window or
On Tue, 15 Jan 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> On Die, 2003-01-14 at 23:54, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> > Mike, what do you think about setting up a separate (entire) tree
> > someplace else like SF ?
> >
> > The reason I am thinking about it is that it looks like I finally fixed
>
Tim Roberts wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:00:35 -0500, David Dawes wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:19:29AM -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
> >>After coming in to find 170-odd messages from the new [Devel] list in my
> >>inbox, I decided to switch to digest mode. However, mailman tells me that
On Die, 2003-01-14 at 23:54, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> Mike, what do you think about setting up a separate (entire) tree
> someplace else like SF ?
>
> The reason I am thinking about it is that it looks like I finally fixed
> the problem that GATOS memory controller changes induced in DRI M
I hear that discussion is the foundation of democracy and it seems that
devel list is getting quiet again ;)
So another suggestion:
Mike, what do you think about setting up a separate (entire) tree
someplace else like SF ?
The reason I am thinking about it is that it looks like I finally fixed
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:00:35 -0500, David Dawes wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:19:29AM -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
>>After coming in to find 170-odd messages from the new [Devel] list in my
>>inbox, I decided to switch to digest mode. However, mailman tells me that
>>"the list administrator has
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, David Dawes wrote:
>>I can't speak for others who have been interested in a bugzilla
>>for XFree86 before, but I've personally just wanted to see an
>>open mind towards it. To have open mindedness about the idea is
>>a very big difference from being against the idea, and we n
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Daniel Stone wrote:
>Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 07:25:54 +1100
>From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C"
>S
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:39:09PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>I can't speak for others who have been interested in a bugzilla
>for XFree86 before, but I've personally just wanted to see an
>open mind towards it. To have open mindedness about the idea is
>a very big difference from being agains
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 07:25:54AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:55:51PM -0500, David Dawes scrawled:
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:43:55PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>>
>> >and that, many of them still are. Some of them have applied for
>> >membership, and some of the
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 01:55:51PM -0500, David Dawes scrawled:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:43:55PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
> >and that, many of them still are. Some of them have applied for
> >membership, and some of them have gotten membership.
> >
> >Right now, membership is somewhat
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, David Dawes wrote:
>>and that, many of them still are. Some of them have applied for
>>membership, and some of them have gotten membership.
>>
>>Right now, membership is somewhat unneeded for the most part of
>>course which IMHO helps things a lot. The opening up of this
>
Tony Sweeney writes:
> In British English, it's "never buy a pig in a poke", where 'poke' is
> an archaic word for 'bag'. There is another slang phrase, to "let the
OK. thanks for the information!
> cat out of the bag", which is to reveal the truth, for instance that
There is exactly the sam
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Tim Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:51:10 -0500 (EST), Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >
> >One thing I don't understand about this is that this is an integrated
> >graphics chipset, right ? I.e. it uses part of system RAM for video RAM.
> >There is no code in radeon drive
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 12:43:55PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>and that, many of them still are. Some of them have applied for
>membership, and some of them have gotten membership.
>
>Right now, membership is somewhat unneeded for the most part of
>course which IMHO helps things a lot. The op
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>This is a shared memory architecture. The bios sets up how much
>of the memory goes to graphics processing (default of 32MB, I
>have it set to 64MB).
>
>Also, I know that the radeons are almost all AGP, but with the
>very first RADEON cards, they did h
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, David Dawes wrote:
>>David, this is wonderful news. I'm very pleased to see this
>>change happen. I've wondered for a long time why the private
>>devel list was private, considering almost if not all of the
>>discussions that have taken place on it in all the time I've be
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, David Dawes wrote:
>I read your article and saw it the same way. I think that this
>is typical of you, you speak out of both sides of your mouth.
>You are saying a lot of things in this thread differently than
>you did in that diary entry of yours.
You're certainly entitle
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:51:10 -0500 (EST), Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
>One thing I don't understand about this is that this is an integrated
>graphics chipset, right ? I.e. it uses part of system RAM for video RAM.
>There is no code in radeon driver to deal with this yet.
And there doesn't need to
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> > One thing I don't understand about this is that this is an integrated
> > graphics chipset, right ? I.e. it uses part of system RAM for
> > video RAM.
> > There is no code in radeon driver to deal with this yet.
> >
> > b
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, David Dawes wrote:
>>Nope. There are clearly times XFree86 should say: this shouldn't be fixed
>>in XFree86: the distro should fix their breakage. For example, I think
>>it would be correct to do this when a distro has a distro specific compiler
>>bug: making XFree86's code
This is a shared memory architecture.
The bios sets up how much of the memory goes to graphics processing (default of 32MB,
I have it set to 64MB).
Also, I know that the radeons are almost all AGP, but with the very first RADEON
cards, they did have a PCI version.
This might not make a big diffe
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, David Dawes wrote:
>Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:03:10 -0500
>From: David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: Another voice
>
>On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 02:30:05PM -0500,
Swinging a dead cat is a good way to protect oneself from a hissy fest.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Hannes Reinecke
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 9:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: Another voice
Tony Sweeney wro
Title: RE: ATI card addition to xf86PciInfo.h
> One thing I don't understand about this is that this is an integrated
> graphics chipset, right ? I.e. it uses part of system RAM for
> video RAM.
> There is no code in radeon driver to deal with this yet.
>
> best
Tony Sweeney wrote:
In British English, it's "never buy a pig in a poke", where 'poke' is
an archaic word for 'bag'. There is another slang phrase, to "let the
cat out of the bag", which is to reveal the truth, for instance that
the pig in the poke is actually a cat. Evidently, passing cats off
In British English, it's "never buy a pig in a poke", where 'poke' is
an archaic word for 'bag'. There is another slang phrase, to "let the
cat out of the bag", which is to reveal the truth, for instance that
the pig in the poke is actually a cat. Evidently, passing cats off
unseen as piglets has
On Die, 2003-01-14 at 08:59, D. Hageman wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > I'm attaching the output from scanpci -v.
> > >
> > > When I run the command "XFree86 -configure" it give the message:
> > > XFree86 has fou
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Ben
> > >
> >
> > What system is this ? Is it a notebook with integrated graphics ?
> >
>
> It is a notebook with integrated graphics. You can find them in compaq/hp
> laptops these days. I have a friend with one and I was supposed to sit
> down with him to see what I co
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 06:10:04 -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tim Roberts wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:12:21 -0800 (PST), Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tim Roberts wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >> As I recall, there is work going on to eli
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I'm attaching the output from scanpci -v.
> >
> > When I run the command "XFree86 -configure" it give the message:
> > XFree86 has found a valid card configuration.
> > Unfortunately the appropriat
42 matches
Mail list logo
