___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
,
John Smirley
Sales Manager
888-662-2256
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.gtlaser.com
HP Laser Toner Description Price per unit
1 HP C3906A US$51.50
2 HP C4092A US$51.75
3 HP C3903A US$62.75
4 HP 92274A US$70.75
5 HP 92298A US$73.95
6 HP C4096A US$76.25
7 HP 4127X US$96.50
8 HP 4129X US$126.75
9
increased hardware
sales by opening up their source pool then the amount of income they
generate by selling their marginal SDK's to a handful of partners. Maybe
it would be worthwhile for someone to press them on this issue.
John
___
Devel mailing list
xfree86 smarts tests it? :(
Thanks,
John.
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 00:19, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 15:22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 11:52, Simon Urbanek wrote:
Hi all,
I have several problems with the ATI Radeon drivers in XFree on my Mac G4
' is a tool which gives you a command line interface to this
extension and is very handy and can be used to do things like simulate
paste for apps which don't support pasting nativly.
John
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:34:50PM +0200, Roland Pabel wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know if anyone ever
/documents/powerpc/XF86Config-4.dualhead
John.
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 12:08, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 16:29, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
latest CVS build (by myself) as of yesterday (4.3.99...)
When did you try exactly ? I've seen more fixes for TMDS getting
Title: ad
As Seen On
TV:
CNN, ABC News And More ...
Doctors Create VPRX Penis Enlargement Pills
Gain Up
To 3+ Full Inches In Length
Increase
Your Penis Width (Girth) By 20%
Stop Premature
Ejaculation!
Produce
Larger, Rock Hard Erections
=anoncvs.xfree86.org
base=/home/boston/jdennis/.cvsup
*default prefix=/home/boston/jdennis/src/xfree86 delete use-rel-suffix
*default compress
*default tag=.
xc-all
doctools-all
contrib-all
xtest-all
utils-all
--
John Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel
? If not can you help explain where
I'm missing the mark and what the actual issues are?
John
--
John Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
the utility xf86ReadBIOS?
John
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
to swap out physical pages.. */
--
John Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
for write
combining.
John
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
conclusions let me know.
John What had been confusing at this end is the notion that ROM by
John definition can never be incoherent, therefore cached
John vs. non-cached should be irrelevant.
HP Ah, I see that point. The problem in this case is that the
HP chipset may support different types of access
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 13:40, Egbert Eich wrote:
Marc Aurele La France writes:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Egbert Eich wrote:
Frankly, I don't see how this EFI MDT can be accurate given that, in
general, whether or not a particular PCI memory assignment will tolerate
caching and/or
or beyond the
limits of the PCI timing requirements? My understanding is the ZX1 is a
very aggressive chipset tuned for high performance, so its possible on a
standard PC you may not have seen the timing problems, even if you were
close to the limits.
John
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 12:46, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
Secondly, EFI is already doing the wrong thing by marking PCI ROMs as
non-cacheable. This doesn't inspire confidence...
I believe there is a difference between ROM's being logically cacheable
and the way the ZX1 actually wires that
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 16:40, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
... which basically means that framebuffers cannot benifit from CPU
caching. I don't beleive this to be the case.
Further to this, it appears you don't realise that the frambuffers we're
talking about here, _are_ in PCI space.
be wrapped. What ever came of that?
--
John Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
the simplist, most
robust, and in practical terms sacrifices little.
Comments?
I'm going to file a bugzilla on this, its very definitely broken on
ia64 and causes the server to crash. I will put the text of this in
the bugzilla.
John
___
Devel mailing list
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 20:11, David Dawes wrote:
John wrapper. So as long as we've already lost module
John independence by virtue of linking the system function why
John not go all the way and use the system definition of the
John system function's argument? It seems like
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 14:35, David Dawes wrote:
What's the difference between this in the core executable:
xf86A(pointer data)
{
return A(data);
}
SYMFUNC(xf86A)
and this:
SYMFUNCALIAS(xf86A, A)
The difference is that xf86A may massage data in some system specific
to print XKB events from xkbevd.c, but this seems
like a generally useful thing.. does this already exist? would patches
implementing it be accepted? or has Xmu been given up on.
John
--
---
John Meacham - California
up with several folks who
starting around last spring started seeing the same problem, but none
of the mail threads had a follow up solution.
Thanks,
John
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
I am writing a customerized graphic card driver in xfree86,
and I refered to NV dirver, I can find that NVSetupForSolidLine and
NVSubsequentSolidHorVertLine
.. functions to manipulate the HW register,
I wonder that it is just filling some data in the registers, I want to know
when and
templates and type conversions.
As a minor side note, definitions of bit flags should be tagged as
unsigned. Thus things like:
#define DRM_LOCK_HELD 0x8000
#define DRM_LOCK_CONT 0x4000
should really be:
#define DRM_LOCK_HELD 0x8000U
#define DRM_LOCK_CONT 0x4000U
John
? If so
do they manage AGP themselves, or do they use the systems agpgart
driver? Do they replace the systems agpgart driver?
--
John Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
. But if the program is already running, is it
possible to do the equivalent? If this isn't possible currently, it
would be a really great thing to have in the future.
Thanks in advance,
John
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman
by submitting the converted XFree86 4.4 Release Notes, the New
Design document, and the README.ati document. I chose these because
they represent different styles of documents and will present good
examples for discussion of any requested changes to style.
Questions and comments are encouraged.
John
anticipated to support PCIE only systems? And if so what's the
timeframe?
--
John Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
or if these systems are going to
be dead in the water for open source for anything other than a server.
So I'm digging for what people know or believe the issues are.
John
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
unfamiliar with the
formatting of LinuxDoc but to me a colon should mean that the list directly follows,
not that it points to a section.
And btw, I like the little finger for a NOTE. Other than that John, I like it.
Georgina,
1) The double comma is an oops on my part. I will publish
a bit odd.
John
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
changes to either the markup or
stylesheets.
So for now, the Operating System names will appear as shown. Later, I am open for
suggestions such as yours.
Again, thanks for taking the time to provide this valuable feedback.
John
PS: Pardon my breaking the thread, but my new bleeding-edge mailer
===
That's a typo on my part. Sorry.
I'll have that fixed in a moment.
PS: The new url s/b http://www.XFree86.Org/~jwhimpel/html/ReleaseNotes.
html
John
===
Is this a mistake, or is there something like DDC that is called DCC?
Hugh Redelmeier
[EMAIL
John
--
John Hay -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -ur org/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/s3/s3_driver.c
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/s3/s3_driver.c
--- org/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/s3/s3_driver.c Thu Sep 25 13:05:02
2003
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw
if anyone has heard of a problem like this, or if some
relevant bug fix has been made to the radeon driver since XFree86 4.3.
-John Belmonte
--
http:// ift ile.org/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
in 4.2.1 but, as there are so many changes to the driver
between 4.2.1 and 4.3.0, I don't know where to look. I'm not familiar
with the radeon code or XFree86 display driver framework at all.
-John
--
http:// ift ile.org/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL
fixed since 4.3.
I think it may be worth tracking this down, because I don't know if 4.4
will make it to the Debian Sarge release. How extensive are the radeon
changes between 4.3 and 4.4?
-John
--
http:// ift ile.org/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL
I've just discovered fspanel. I love it because it it so so simple. I
use XFree86 on MacOSX so my OS is already provided for me and I don't
need all the extra features of gnome or kde just to get their panel.
Here's my issue: fspanel doesn't have the vaguest idea about Xinerama,
and I have
. The proposed patch in
its entirety is attached below.
Thank you and best regards,
John Fujii
HP WGBU Linux Graphics
--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/shared/bios_mmap.c.orig 2001-05-23
08:46:05.0 -0600
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os
? If so, is there an anticipated release date?
Thank you.
John Bussoletti
John Bussoletti
Enabling Technology and Research
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group
Email: john.e.[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (425) 234-1278
a contract with Hummingbird...
John
Bussoletti
-Original Message-From: Tim Roberts
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 4:24
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Added Pseudocolor
Visuals for XFree86?Bussoletti, John E wrote:
At Boeing we
the color map overflows, the display is not colored
correctly. So somehow Windows/ExCeed seems to be doing a bit more in
emulating capabilities that aren't being provided by the Xfree 86
driver.
John Bussoletti
-Original Message-
From: Ian Romanick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
43 matches
Mail list logo
