Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:32 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 6 Sep 2019, at 10:27, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi all,
On 05/09/2019 17:40, Simon Urli wrote:
On 05/09/2019 17:24, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:43 PM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone
On 06/09/2019 10:35, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:32 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 6 Sep 2019, at 10:27, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi all,
On 05/09/2019 17:40, Simon Urli wrote:
On 05/09/2019 17:24, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:43 PM Simon Urli
Hi all,
On 05/09/2019 17:40, Simon Urli wrote:
On 05/09/2019 17:24, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:43 PM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
reopening this thread since I started to close some flicker issues as
part of BFD and got comments for those.
So the last mails
On 05/09/2019 17:24, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:43 PM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
reopening this thread since I started to close some flicker issues as
part of BFD and got comments for those.
So the last mails on this threads suggested to close the flicker issues
memory for the second check and on their age: I closed the older ones.
So what should we do on them?
Thanks,
Simon
On 26/03/2019 10:58, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 26 Mar 2019, at 10:31, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I was checking our list of flickering tests in JIRA
(https
Hello,
results: https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Bug%20Fixing%20Day%20222
Thanks,
Simon
On 29/08/2019 07:43, Simon Urli wrote:
Hello devs,
This Thursday is BFD#222:
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/XWikiDays#HBugfixingday
Our current status is:
* -19 bugs over 120 days
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
of this proposal.
Simon
thanks
Paul
On 22 Aug 2019, at 16:01, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I recently (in XWiki 11.6RC1) introduced a new property "enabled" in
XWiki.User as part of https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12654 to
distinguish between inactive users (who have n
ve to inactive
4. remove the property "enabled" from users
Le jeu. 22 août 2019 à 16:01, Simon Urli a écrit :
Hi everyone,
I recently (in XWiki 11.6RC1) introduced a new property "enabled" in
XWiki.User as part of https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12654 to
distinguish betw
t; property to check if a user is
active or not, and we could rely on it to set them enabled or disabled
in the admin.
The email_check property would be used only for the check email
mechanism, so it will avoid any confusion in the semantic.
WDYT?
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
The XWiki development team is proud to announce the availability of
XWiki 11.6.1.
This is a bugfix release that covers important issues that we have
discovered since XWiki 11.6 has been released.
It has been released mainly to fix a bug related with the usage of
nested wikimacro, which
but it doesn’t
seem easy to implement, so right now, I’m only proposing it as a best practice.
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
ed
BSD license). I don't think we cannot completely reuse it as it is, but
it's at least a good inspiration to do our own implementation based on a
standard. A better solution would certainly to use a dedicated
maintained library but I did not manage to find it.
Now we could also assume that the current behaviour of the merge is what
we want and we keep up with it.
So what do you think, should we change our implem or keep it like that?
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
On 25/07/2019 16:49, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 5:33 PM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi Marius,
On 25/07/2019 16:22, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:39 AM Simon Urli
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm currently working on improving security on XWiki
Hi Marius,
On 25/07/2019 16:22, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:39 AM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm currently working on improving security on XWiki comments. We
already use a restricted mode in our comments but that does not cover
every possible case. In order
On 25/07/2019 10:39, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm currently working on improving security on XWiki comments. We
already use a restricted mode in our comments but that does not cover
every possible case. In order to improve it we should also filter out
some part of the html when
/122/files#diff-c33fcb5dca86b155928768dd6e6fbf7eR146)
alt, class, height, id, name, rel, scope, style, target, title, width
Note that href is not included in this list for example.
WDYT?
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
The XWiki development team is proud to announce the availability of
XWiki 11.6RC1.
This release brings new security features related to user authentication
and management, a new way to see document changes closer to the WYSIWYG
edition, and a new macro to define part of a document that should
Hi everyone,
On 28/06/2019 21:32, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 7:12 PM Vincent Massol wrote:
On 28 Jun 2019, at 19:10, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 28 Jun 2019, at 18:56, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a proposal to add a new wikimacro script binding
, and to be able to use:
* $macro.parameters.foo to get a typed parameter value
* $macro.parametersAsString.foo to get the string value parameter
Could you tell me if you agree with all those changes?
Thanks,
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us
is still the
most used java version so I'd say it's better to have both version
tested (Java11 with docker test and java8 with our standard build)
Simon
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
ite new and it would be
more explicit on the long term.
Simon
Kind regards
Stéphane
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
idea?
So WDYT about the 3 questions?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhum...@xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
don’t
support them...
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
h
whatever it contains).
WDYT?
Thanks,
Eduard
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:53 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
mailto:vali...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:33 PM Simon Urli mailto:simon.u...@xwiki.com>> wrote:
>
>
action is "atomic", i.e. without leaving the content in an
unfinished merge state), whatever the edited version is will overwrite
the DB version of the document (i.e. force with whatever it contains).
WDYT?
Thanks,
Eduard
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:53 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
ma
Hi everyone,
I'm coming back on this proposal since there was some ambiguities.
On 23/05/2019 11:10, Simon Urli wrote:
So trying to sum up the discussion to see if we all agree.
All the above is in the case of a save conflict:
1. Default behaviour for all users is to try an automatic merge
On 23/05/2019 17:51, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 23 May 2019, at 17:47, Simon Urli wrote:
On 23/05/2019 17:37, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 23 May 2019, at 17:33, Simon Urli wrote:
On 23/05/2019 16:00, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:10 PM Simon Urli wrote
On 23/05/2019 17:37, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 23 May 2019, at 17:33, Simon Urli wrote:
On 23/05/2019 16:00, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:10 PM Simon Urli wrote:
So trying to sum up the discussion to see if we all agree.
All the above is in the case
On 23/05/2019 16:00, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:10 PM Simon Urli wrote:
So trying to sum up the discussion to see if we all agree.
All the above is in the case of a save conflict:
1. Default behaviour for all users is to try an automatic merge
On 23/05/2019 12:15, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 23 May 2019, at 11:37, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:10 AM Simon Urli wrote:
So trying to sum up the discussion to see if we all agree.
All the above is in the case of a save conflict:
1. Default behaviour for all
can click on it to see the diff/conflicts
5. The conflict resolution is line-by-line based.
WDYT?
Simon
On 23/05/2019 10:00, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 23 May 2019, at 09:43, Simon Urli wrote:
On 23/05/2019 09:31, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 23 May 2019, at 09:25, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi Caty,
On 22/
On 23/05/2019 09:31, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 23 May 2019, at 09:25, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi Caty,
On 22/05/2019 14:51, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
I'm not sure I agree about this profile option.
Indeed we want to make things as simple as possible and having conflict
resolutions can
On 23/05/2019 09:22, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 23 May 2019, at 09:14, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi Vincent, all,
On 22/05/2019 11:03, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 22 May 2019, at 10:45, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on the merge on save for the roadmap of 11.5
, at 10:45, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on the merge on save for the roadmap of 11.5 and I need some
decision to be taken.
The main idea of the merge on save, is to try to merge users work in
case of save conflict. Knowing that the merge might led to merge conflict
in cas
Hi Vincent, all,
On 22/05/2019 11:03, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 22 May 2019, at 10:45, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on the merge on save for the roadmap of 11.5 and I need some
decision to be taken.
The main idea of the merge on save, is to try to merge users work
of conflict they would have the
same feeling as before the warning conflict window: i.e. to loose some
part of their work.
WDYT?
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
i.org/browse/XWIKI-12142 )
WDYT?
@devs: please confirm that you’re ok. @Simon, please let me know if it’s ok for
the item where there’s a question mark. @Marius: same for you.
@evalica: I didn’t put any investigations/designs but we should IMO. Any
proposals?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon
Hi,
On 09/05/2019 14:52, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 9 May 2019, at 09:36, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On 09/05/2019 09:10, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 7 May 2019, at 08:21, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm currently working on allowing inline editing on new
Hi Vincent,
On 09/05/2019 09:10, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 7 May 2019, at 08:21, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm currently working on allowing inline editing on new wikimacros.
Why only on wikimacros? We also need to be able to edit existing wikimacros to
make them inline
nge in the HTML macro.
Simon
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:21 AM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm currently working on allowing inline editing on new wikimacros.
My first challenge right now is to cope with the problem of inserting
the macro content and allowing to inline
use it in
my tests.
Thanks,
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
On 02/05/2019 11:33, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 2 May 2019, at 11:22, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi all,
On 02/05/2019 11:20, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 10:57 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
I did a quick analysis of 11.2 & 11.3 to see how many bugs we fixed since they
lved issues (123)
So we were not even able to catch up with created bugs during the period.
So the question is: why are we not able to catch up?
Let’s look at who closed bugs during the period:
https://www.evernote.com/l/AHfj3Z0DW8RAuZ0AHw9BX6cnoDZc89KPvog
Top resolvers:
* Simon Urli - 32
* Th
The XWiki development team is proud to announce the availability of
XWiki 11.3.
This release was focused on bug fixes and also comes with a couple of
small improvements for things like the live table date filter, the
Database List field from AppWithinMinutes or the Delete User modal.
There's
On 29/03/2019 10:37, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 29 Mar 2019, at 10:33, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On 29/03/2019 10:27, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to discuss about introducing a checker in the tests to fail the test
if there's a warning message about a deprecated APIs
of
failing test coming and not much bandwidth to fix them all so starting
to "accept" failing tests where we shouldn't.
Simon
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
the flickers we don't remember having
seen after a cycle as inactive.
WDYT?
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
or the ZIP package (for Demo+Mac), but
imagine something similar for all the other packages.
What do you think? Should I continue in this direction?
Thanks,
Caty
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
what this backlink represents?
In that case shouldn't we put it in link table too?
Thanks,
Marius
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
ly we delete and
recreate all links, each time...).
IMO it would really ease the understanding of links and backlinks, solve
the issues on farm and help us to maintain this code. + it doesn't break
any legacy since we keep the existing Link table.
WDYT?
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software
to review the release notes:
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ReleaseNotes/Data/XWiki/10.11.3
Thanks for your support
-The XWiki dev team
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
The XWiki development team is proud to announce the availability of
XWiki 10.11.3.
This is a bugfix release that covers important issues that we have
discovered since 10.11.2 has been released.
You can download it here: https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download
Make sure to review the
direction ;)).
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
a failure email when there are failing
tests in the build, to avoid false positives
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
Hi everyone!
Yay \o/
Thanks for the trust! I'll try to not break everything right now ;)
Simon
On 11/02/2019 09:04, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Devs,
The XWiki committers have voted a new committer: Simon Urli.
Welcome as a committer Simon :)
@Simon: Congrats, and thank you for the work
ee:
https://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/UserGuide/Features/DocumentLifecycle/#HPagesthatcontainsanusedXClass-1
Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 16:55, Simon Urli a écrit :
Hi Marius,
On 30/01/2019 15:45, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
Hi devs,
I'm working on https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWI
ctly after the class rename.
WDYT?
I agree that the question should remain if we cannot guarantee that all
mentions of the classes are not renamed.
Simon
Thanks,
Marius
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
ies actually.
To be a bit more constructive I'd say that maybe for those changes we
should not focus on a role but just say "Advanced changes".
My 2 cents,
Simon
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
to keep the API of SplittingCriterion which
defines the method with depth parameter, but to not rely on this
parameter in the HeadingLevelSplittingCriterion implementation, that we
rely on for splitting imported office document.
WDYT?
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u
“solved by”, also use the “depends on” link
WDYT?
+1
Simon
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
the release where we can do heavy refactoring and it’s not bad
to get some more time.
Cons:
* One less release
WDYT? Do you see other cons?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
On 22/11/2018 10:22, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 9:57 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
On 21 Nov 2018, at 17:46, Adel Atallah wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:36 PM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
one of the most validation error we have with WCAG is about
of consecutive in translations
* can maybe be used to present them in another way?
cons:
* need to develop/test/maintain a new rendering syntax
I'd personnaly vote like this:
A: +0
B: +1
C: -1
D: +0
WDYT?
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http
, we apply similar rules that for runtime
code or override the maven configs)
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
part of the platform JenkinsFile.
WDYT?
+1 for both jobs
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
ave space for a
"Restore all" button or any other bulk action that we may add later. It
looks OK with one button but it doesn't look good IMO with two big
buttons.
Thanks,
Marius
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 12:48 PM Simon Urli
wrote:
Hi all,
I just edited the design page to propose two
)
So I don't see the problem with option C.
Thanks,
Marius
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:38 AM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
thanks for your answers.
I'll do solution C for the next release then, we can continue discuss
about D in the dedicated issue.
Simon
On 29/10/2018 16:23, Guillaume
On 31/10/2018 10:52, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:28 AM Vincent Massol wrote:
On 31 Oct 2018, at 10:15, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi,
On 31/10/2018 09:06, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
We currently have
https://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community
for
Oracle.
* Any idea?
What about the cycles that are bundled in major LTS distributions?
Simon
So WDYT about the 3 questions?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
clear the recycle bin" is simpler than a generic "bulk" action.
Le lun. 29 oct. 2018 à 15:17, Adel Atallah a
écrit :
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:09 PM Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 4:06 PM Adel Atallah
wrote:
Hello Simon,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 2:59 P
w/Proposal/Deleteallfromrecyclebin
The 4 proposal are numbered as following:
A. A simple button
B. A simple button with a checkbox to activate it
C. A button and a modal to confirm the action
D. A generic bulk action on the livetable
Thanks in advance for your feedbacks.
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Softwar
mon, doxia-twiki, doxia-docbook, doxia-twiki).
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
On 10/17/18 11:29 AM, Guillaume Delhumeau wrote:
Le mer. 17 oct. 2018 à 10:47, Simon Urli <mailto:simon.u...@xwiki.com>> a écrit :
On 10/17/18 10:35 AM, Guillaume Delhumeau wrote:
> I'm OK.
>
>
> I'm just thinking about an other particular cas
On 10/17/18 10:43 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 17 Oct 2018, at 10:41, Simon Urli wrote:
On 10/17/18 10:37 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 17 Oct 2018, at 10:31, Simon Urli wrote:
On 10/17/18 10:22 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 17 Oct 2018, at 10:12, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi
to stopping event propagation when it's cancelled
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 6:07 PM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
the current behaviour of the ObservationManager is to always triggers
the listeners if it matches the events.
Now regarding the CancelableEvents, the match is only done on the type
On 10/17/18 10:37 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On 17 Oct 2018, at 10:31, Simon Urli wrote:
On 10/17/18 10:22 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 17 Oct 2018, at 10:12, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi Vincent and all,
On 10/17/18 9:41 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 16 Oct 2018
On 10/17/18 10:22 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 17 Oct 2018, at 10:12, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi Vincent and all,
On 10/17/18 9:41 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 16 Oct 2018, at 17:43, Simon Urli wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm coming back on this proposal as the work
Hi Vincent and all,
On 10/17/18 9:41 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 16 Oct 2018, at 17:43, Simon Urli wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm coming back on this proposal as the work is going on, to basically propose
to dropping the warning on copy action.
I try to sum up why in the following
Hi all,
I took the liberty to already create the PR, then you can see the impact
on the code: https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/pull/49
Simon.
On 10/17/18 9:09 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
+1 to stopping event propagation when it's cancelled
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 6:07 PM Simon Urli
to a bad UX: if an event triggers multiple questions, no matter if
one is cancelled, all questions will be asked to the user.
Do you know if the current behaviour is required at some places?
Else do you agree on changing it?
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More
this case, I propose to
simply drop it.
Do you agree?
Simon
On 9/26/18 10:27 AM, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
ok trying to sum-up (I'm only talking about cases with XClass below, to
simplify):
- according to Vincent, we should completely prevent simple users to
copy/move/rename and
do you propose
that we put an empty default content?
Simon
Thanks,
Marius
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:05 PM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on the roadmap issues related to the inline edition with
WYSIWYG editor for macro content and macro parameters.
The first step is to add
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 21 Sep 2018, at 16:58, Simon Urli wrote:
On 9/21/18 4:53 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
+1 for the warning, but I would not forbid simple users from renaming
or moving pages but instead just hide the action (from the page menu).
OK I should have written it: by &q
Thanks,
Adel
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:55 AM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi all,
On 9/24/18 9:00 AM, Clément Aubin wrote:
Hi,
On 09/23/2018 10:12 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 21 Sep 2018, at 16:58, Simon Urli wrote:
On 9/21/18 4:53 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
+1 for the warning, but I would
Hi all,
On 9/24/18 9:00 AM, Clément Aubin wrote:
Hi,
On 09/23/2018 10:12 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 21 Sep 2018, at 16:58, Simon Urli wrote:
On 9/21/18 4:53 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
+1 for the warning, but I would not forbid simple users from renaming
or moving pages
On 9/21/18 5:32 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:56 PM Simon Urli wrote:
On 9/21/18 4:53 PM, Adel Atallah wrote:
+1 for the warning, but I would not forbid simple users from renaming
or moving pages but instead just hide the action (from the page menu).
OK I should
n an error message if the user try to access the
renaming/moving page (using forged URL)
So you suggest we shouldn't do 2?
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:44 PM Simon Urli wrote:
Hi all,
users might currently break their AWM application by renaming/moving
pages containing XClass definition.
We nee
performing edit
on XWiki pages
WDYT?
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:56 PM Simon Urli wrote:
On 9/12/18 5:45 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Yeah I know, too many answer mails...
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:28 PM Thomas Mortagne
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:07 PM Simon Urli wrote:
On 9/12/18 5:02 PM, Marius
On 9/12/18 5:45 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Yeah I know, too many answer mails...
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:28 PM Thomas Mortagne
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:07 PM Simon Urli wrote:
On 9/12/18 5:02 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Simon Urli
On 9/12/18 5:02 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:18 PM, Simon Urli wrote:
Hello everyone,
as a follow up of this proposal and the discussion we had, I just created
the following design proposal:
https://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main
:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 3:47 PM Simon Urli wrote:
On 9/10/18 3:24 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 2:56 PM Marius Dumitru Florea
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Thomas Mortagne <
thomas.mo
:13 PM Simon Urli
wrote:
On 9/10/18 1:35 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 10 Sep 2018, at 13:05, Simon Urli
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on the roadmap issues related to the inline edition
with
WYSIWYG editor for macro content and macro parameters.
Cool :) We've been w
On 9/10/18 1:35 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 10 Sep 2018, at 13:05, Simon Urli wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on the roadmap issues related to the inline edition with WYSIWYG
editor for macro content and macro parameters.
Cool :) We've been waiting for a long time about
t"
which would be used as a tag to allow inline edition?
2. WDYT about using a data-parameter and this class for inline
editing of parameters?
Thanks,
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
On 9/5/18 3:20 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:58 PM Simon Urli wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm writing this email as a follow-up after (yet another) brainstorming
with Vincent about how adding the app Menu in the administration
(https://jira.xwiki.org/browse
in an iframe
3. provide only a link to access the app externally
4. ... another idea?
Thanks,
Simon
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
h has more details about the KPIs/metrics:
https://up1.xwikisas.com/#QJyxqspKXSzuWNOHUuAaEA
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne
--
Simon Urli
Software Engineer at XWiki SAS
simon.u...@xwiki.com
More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
100 matches
Mail list logo
