On Monday, 5 November 2018 at 09:43:06 UTC, FooledDonor wrote:
Get off your pedestal, and drop into the real life of those who
program in D with colleagues not as perfect as you are.
So where are these teams of imperfect D programmers who are
plagued by accidental modifications of private
On Friday, 2 November 2018 at 00:12:29 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.083.0, ♥ to the 51 contributors.
This release comes with betterC support in dub, new
CppRuntime_* version identifiers, an isZeroInit trait, and an
exported environment variable DUB_PACKAGE_VERSION during dub
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 12:17:52 UTC, Danny Arends wrote:
Nice work on the new loader, I'm a big user of the Derelict
loader, and I agree that having a betterC / @nogc loader is a
big win, so thanks in advance for working on it.
Which libraries are going to be supported ? In my
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 10:30:48 UTC, John Burton wrote:
I want to do some graphics using direct3d11 on windows.
There are some bindings that I used once before
https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d
However they are marked as [discontinued]
While I'm sure they will continue to work so
One of the easiest ways to support the D Language Foundation is
using smile.amazon.com when you make a purchase. Until Nov 2,
they're running a special where they're donating 5% (10 times the
usual amount) you buy through AmazonSmile.
smile.amazon.com/ch/47-5352856
Congratulations are in order for Iain Buclaw. His efforts have
been rewarded in a big way. Last Friday, he got the greenlight to
move forward with submitting his changes into GCC:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg01676.html
That's now a reality.
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 01:08:11 UTC, Manu wrote:
FWIW, I'm disappointed with the quality of my dman shirt; I've
put it
through the wash no more than 3-4 times and the print is
aggressively
deteriorating with each wash.
I don't tend to wear it because it's disintegrating so fast.
I'm
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:04:02 UTC, Fleel wrote:
It would be awesome if there were T-Shirts with D-man on them.
I would totally buy one, and would help to support the
foundation too...
We've got a store coming, with t-shirts and other items. D-man
shirts will not be there, though.
On Saturday, 20 October 2018 at 13:48:32 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
If `@nogc` could be relaxed for `new Error` exactly for that
reason, pieces of Phobos could be turned `@nogc`...
But I admit that that change would be controversial...
In the 14.5 (!) years I've been maintaining the Derelict
bindings, I've restructured the source tree a few times (Derelict
1 - 3 to DerelictOrg), had three implementations of the loader
(that I can remember), switched from Subversion to Git, and
supported a few different approaches to building
On Friday, 19 October 2018 at 02:04:37 UTC, Samir wrote:
I would have thought that since this is a dynamic array, I
don't need to pre-assign its length.
Thanks
Just to expand on the previous answers, a dynamic array
declaration with no initializer is an empty array:
int[] arr;
I had intended to publish the next GC series post early this
month, but after many revisions and discussions with a couple of
reviewers, I've decided to put it on hold until something gets
worked out about the conflation of destruction and finalization
in D (something I'll be pushing for
On Monday, 15 October 2018 at 04:14:24 UTC, IM wrote:
What is the effect of calling destroy?
- calling the destructor?
- deallocating the memory?
- both?
It calls the destructor. The GC will deallocate the object's
memory later. However, you need to be careful about how you use
On Friday, 12 October 2018 at 06:01:12 UTC, spikespaz wrote:
I'm using the latest LDC2 beta, and when running the compiler
with -I (Look for imports also in ) it fails with
unresolved externals. These are my commands.
=
$ ldc2
On Wednesday, 10 October 2018 at 13:22:41 UTC, Chris Katko wrote:
int[][] data =
[
[1, 0, 1, 0, 0],
[1, 0, 1, 0, 0],
[1, 0, 1, 1, 1],
[1, 0, 0, 1, 0],
[5, 1, 1, 1, 0]
];
when drawn with data[i][j],
On Sunday, 30 September 2018 at 14:06:20 UTC, Vinod K Chandran
wrote:
Thanks. It worked.
I would like to compile this as a gui. Now it starts with the
cmd. Google search didn't gave me the link i want. Any help ?
With the default OPTLINK linker:
dmd -L/SUBSYSTEM:windows app.d
In this
On Sunday, 30 September 2018 at 04:34:20 UTC, Manu wrote:
Who knows about DIP 1014? (struct move hook)
Is it well received? Is it likely to be accepted soon?
I'm working on the std::string binding, it's almost finished...
but
then I hit a brick wall.
GNU's std::string implementation stores an
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 at 09:54:22 UTC, John Burton
wrote:
Is there any documentation anywhere that deals with calling D
from C? I could find plenty the other way round. I think I'll
give up on the idea though, and rewrite the whole thing in D :)
Rewriting it in D is a great idea
On Tuesday, 18 September 2018 at 00:24:23 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
Yes, i'm using signal(SIGSEGV, sigfn_t func), it catches
correctly, but end the execution after.
I find the alternatives of setjmp/longjmp and sigaction, but
none are avaliable on windows afaik.
setjmp/longjmp are available on
On Monday, 17 September 2018 at 03:16:33 UTC, spikespaz wrote:
There is a project that I wish to use from D
(https://ultralig.ht).
It's Electron, but with forked WebKit and the samples are very,
very fast.
This is a great compromise between wanting to have a very
custom interface and not
I've posted to the blog a brief introduction to the projects that
were selected for the Symmetry Autumn of Code. As the event goes
on, I hope to provide more details about the projects and the
individuals working on them.
The blog:
The last chance for community feedback on DIP 1015, "Deprecation
and removal of implicit conversion from integer and character
literals to bool", is now underway. Please do not leave any
feedback in this thread, but rather in the review thread in the
General forum:
DIP 1015, "Deprecation and removal of implicit conversion from
integer and character literals to bool", is now ready for Final
Review. This is a last chance for community feedback before the
DIP is handed off to Walter and Andrei for the Formal Assessment.
Please read the procedures document
On Friday, 7 September 2018 at 02:44:24 UTC, hridyansh thakur
wrote:
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 16:59:43 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 07/09/2018 4:03 AM, hridyansh thakur wrote:
[...]
That definition isn't complete. Missing at the very least
``();`` to make it a function
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 10:22:47 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
Put it this way: DIP1017 should not go to formal without
change, as it did from draft to community (which I don't think
should have happened without at least some acknowledgement or
refutation of the points raised in
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 05:47:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I'll check back on it later when the tests have finished to
make sure it rendered properly.
And I just realized it won't render properly because I overlooked
one line. Bah.
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 05:07:16 UTC, Bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 01:25:51 UTC, 0xEAB wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 16:59:38 UTC, Tourist wrote:
The "Install .exe" on the main page looks sloppy to me. My
brain wants to read it as "Install.exe" and wonders
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 at 04:51:23 UTC, Manu wrote:
Out of curiosity... what's going on with mine? Is there
something I'm meant to have done? It's kinda just hanging out
no?
Yours is in the Post-Community review stage [1]:
"A DIP may remain in the Post-Community Round N status for a
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 14:30:14 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Last time I checked, it should be me and yshui's named
parameter DIP's next, they really need to be reviewed together
though, at least initially.
I'm not at all thrilled by the idea of running two DIPs through
the
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 14:20:38 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
pull/101 was closed. What's happening now?
I'm not going to start another Community Review until I get some
space in the latter end of the queue. But soon I'll be asking for
Draft Review feedback on the next
On Sunday, 2 September 2018 at 01:05:10 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.082.0.
This release comes with more efficient update functions for
associative arrays, unsafe code in debug blocks, UDAs for
function parameters, an improved dependency resolution and
avoidance of online
On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 18:26:57 UTC, Chris wrote:
I think this sort of misunderstanding is the source of a lot of
friction on this forum. Some users think (or in my case:
thought) that D will be a sound and stable language one day, a
language they can use for loads of stuff, while
On Tuesday, 28 August 2018 at 08:44:26 UTC, Chris wrote:
Last but not least, if it's true that the D Foundation has
raised only 3.2K, then there's something seriously wrong.
The Foundation has significantly more than 3.2k. The Open
Collective account is relatively new and is but one
On Monday, 27 August 2018 at 07:45:03 UTC, Manu wrote:
I think one of the only people qualified to help you is Rainer
Schutze. I think he knows the details of Mago better than
anyone.
Rainer is unable to participate in SAoC as a mentor this time
around. So we're looking for anyone with
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 02:18:15 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Furthermore, I find it hypocritical that some of us are put
through a disproportionately burdensome DIP process requiring
thorough documentation, multiple peer reviews, excessive
delays, and judgement that defaults to "no" for
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 14:56:21 UTC, Seb wrote:
I'm aware, but we don't have any other process for people to
show their support for a DIP, do we?
And for DMD/Druntime/Phobos etc. having a bunch of +1 helps a
PR to move faster as we as reviewers can thus realize that this
is sth.
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 08:32:17 UTC, Seb wrote:
How and where to vote?
At the pull request via +1 and the upcoming "official"
discussion of the PR.
Except that there's no voting process for DIPs. The Community
Review is not intended as a way to vote, simply to provide
feedback
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 17:24:19 UTC, QueenSvetlana wrote:
I'm struggling to understand what the auto keyword is for and
it's appropriate uses. From research, it seems to share the
same capabilities as the var keyword in C#.
auto is one of the most misunderstood understood features in
I'm getting ready to start prepping one of the DIPs in the PR
queue for community review. It proposes adding an `in` operator
for arrays. I haven't gone through it in detail yet, so I invite
anyone with time on their hands to provide feedback on the Draft
so we can more speedily get in shape
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 08:31:15 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
n production.
Im not trying to be negative but if Nim or Rust released a blog
post saying "We made find faster" is it going to get you to try
them out? Is it enough of an enticement to get over you
preconceptions about those
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 19:52:44 UTC, Dave Jones wrote:
What you need a blog post saying the GC has been made 4x
faster. Stuff like that, hey we made D much better now, not
stuff about some corporate user who does targeted advertising.
If you look through the blog, you'll find posts
On Sunday, 19 August 2018 at 18:49:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
they got their team trained up on D. We could stand to talk
more about Sociomantic, D's biggest corporate success so far,
I'll put out an email to Don.
I've got a series on Sociomantic in the works for the blog.
Thanks to everyone who sent in a SAoC application or volunteered
as a mentor. If you haven't yet received an acknowledgement of
your application, you should hear from me in the next 12 hours.
If you haven't heard from me by Saturday, contact me at
aldac...@gmail.com to check in and make sure
On Wednesday, 15 August 2018 at 02:40:22 UTC, Joe wrote:
I understand that, Mike. However if I'm not mistaken given
something in C like
char* strs[] = { "This", "is a", "test"};
AFAIK, even with -betterC and an extern (C), the literals will
still be understood by D as type "string", and
On Tuesday, 14 August 2018 at 23:05:26 UTC, Joe wrote:
I'm attempting a piecemeal conversion of some C programs. I've
converted a few that depend on C modules that are in a library
and now I'm sort of in the middle of converting those C
modules. One of them has an array of strings, i.e., array
You may have noticed the blog is relatively quiet right now.
That's not from a lack of trying. I am in a dry spell with my own
writing at the moment. I've got two posts in progress that
shouldn't be difficult to write, but the words haven't been
coming out the way I want them to nor as easily
On Monday, 13 August 2018 at 13:09:24 UTC, Andrey wrote:
On Monday, 13 August 2018 at 13:05:28 UTC, evilrat wrote:
however the best option is simply avoid naming anything with
same name as module.
Hmm, I thought that name of class should match name of file...
And how to name a file that
On Sunday, 12 August 2018 at 11:23:55 UTC, Aruna Maurya wrote:
So I'll be taking Eugene's code as reference to try and
implement malloc free and realloc in dlang.
Be sure to send your proposal in by August 15!
On Saturday, 11 August 2018 at 19:50:30 UTC, Ivan Kazmenko wrote:
n
This was most close to solving my problem. Thanks!
I've installed the components shown in wiki image: v141 tools
and the SDKs.
VS 2017 Community includes everything you need. There's no reason
to install the SDK
On Saturday, 11 August 2018 at 14:36:59 UTC, zhani wrote:
On Saturday, 11 August 2018 at 08:47:59 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 August 2018 at 12:05:33 UTC, zhani wrote:
[...]
I don't do any sort of Android development, so I've never
tested any Derelict packages on the platform. A
On Saturday, 11 August 2018 at 15:46:47 UTC, tide wrote:
extern(C) is a feature, Derelict are libraries.
https://dlang.org/spec/interfaceToC.html
You can use Derelict "static" to the same effect I think, but
they way they achieve it doesn't play well with auto completion
and such.
All of
On Tuesday, 7 August 2018 at 12:05:33 UTC, zhani wrote:
howdy :-)
can anybody use sdl2 on android?
first, i got a ldc2 for android. i just followed here on
windows:
https://wiki.dlang.org/Build_D_for_Android#Windows
so i could compile a sieve.d but didnt run it on android yet.
then next?
On Friday, 10 August 2018 at 15:18:31 UTC, Aniketh Girish wrote:
Over the past few months, I have been working on learning about
different protocols and about their implementation. I
understand the concept of HTTP/2 and I have a basic
understanding of its implementation. I would like to be
I would like to remind everyone to please read the procedures
document regarding the development stage for a new DIP [1] before
submitting one. DIPs *should not be developed in the PR queue*.
Doing so has the potential to result in a long thread of comments
on minor details before we're ready
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom
Type", has begun. To participate, please visit the review thread
for the details:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/bvyzkatgwlkiserqr...@forum.dlang.org
*Please leave all feedback in the review thread rather than here!*
Thanks!
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/8274b0f600075e4553b41c31f4b77be2d917bb40/DIPs/DIP1017.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
occur in this thread. The review
On Thursday, 12 July 2018 at 14:46:15 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I'm very happy to announce the next Seoul D meetup on August 9
at 7:00 pm. We're partnering with local company BlockchainOS
and the Meetup group 'Learn Teach Code Seoul' for an
interactive 'Introduction to D' presentation/tutorial
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 08:01:47 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
Btw I *had* ("And I'd be glad to mentor you on this :)", here
on July 24th).
Thanks for remembering me why I now better enjoy the Crystal
community...
Sorry, I seem to have missed that. But to quote from the SAoC
page [1]:
On Saturday, 4 August 2018 at 18:24:28 UTC, B Krishnan Iyer wrote:
Hello everyone, I am Newbie here and I am interested in "
Implement a FAT/FAT32/EXFAT file system for use in embedded
systems" project which is part of SAOC. For past a year I have
been working on embedded systems and invested
On Sunday, 5 August 2018 at 04:47:42 UTC, tanner00 wrote:
[...]
Hi, I’m interested in working on this project and just wanted
to touch base. Is there any word on who will be mentoring this
project? I’m entering college this fall but I’ve been
programming since a very young age and enjoy
On Wednesday, 1 August 2018 at 20:57:30 UTC, Everlast wrote:
I can create a console for a dll using AllocConsole and special
Write functions but this is a pain. How do I get all standard
input and output to either use this console or for the app to
create the console automatically?
The
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 20:05:28 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
Would it be easier to submit a approved conflict of interest
paper with the application?
All I'm saying is that each applicant is responsible for making
sure they are free and clear to participate. If you have an
employment
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 13:36:13 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 at 03:23:41 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Second, it is incumbent upon non-student applicants who are
currently employed by a software development firm to ensure
there are no contractual barriers to participating.
I've updated the SAoC page to reflect the decision to accept
applications from non-university students. I want to make two
things very clear.
First, preference will be given to university students who can
provide proof of enrollment. That's not to say that their
applications will
On Friday, 27 July 2018 at 14:31:24 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the earliest thread I could find in the archives, based
solely on searching for "array" in the title. I almost fell
down the rabbit hole reading some of those old threads, as the
ones I did look at tickled my memory.
On Friday, 27 July 2018 at 14:12:53 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 27 July 2018 at 14:09:02 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
From what I recall, UFCS for arrays were essentially a bug -
an unintended side effect of how the properties were
implemented. But it's been 15 years, so I can't really
On Friday, 27 July 2018 at 14:09:02 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
From what I recall, UFCS for arrays were essentially a bug - an
unintended side effect of how the properties were implemented.
But it's been 15 years, so I can't really trust my memory. :p
You're not alone! That's how I
On Friday, 27 July 2018 at 13:38:26 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Reverse and sort were properties (compiler built-ins), not
extensions. If it existed in 2002, it's safe to say it was
there pretty much from the beginning.
-Steve
I came to D in 2003. I recall this coming up in the
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 08:09:33 UTC, ANtlord wrote:
Hello! I'm trying run my GUI application getting a console
hidden. The application is on top of GTKD, compiled with dmd
2.081.1 in Windows 7 x64. I read a few threads on the forum and
StackOverflow and I got that I need to add a module
On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 at 08:48:54 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
Here's my test
extern (Windows)
int WinMain(HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance, LPSTR
lpCmdLine, int iCmdShow)
When using WinMain, subsystem:windows is the default. The OP
wants to use main as the entry point,
On Monday, 23 July 2018 at 13:02:33 UTC, Zheng (Vic) Luo wrote:
Another issue of this program is that me, as an incoming
graduate in the U.S., are prohibited to "work" in my first
school year. (that law doesn't affect GSoC since summer is
considered as the second school year). I'm not sure
On Saturday, 21 July 2018 at 12:17:54 UTC, Greatsam4sure wrote:
Sorry for the typo. This is the problem
auto arithmetic(T, V, U)(T a, V b, U op){
return mixin("a"~op~"b");
}
//call like this
arithmetic(1.5,2.5,"+");
Compiler says the variable op is not reach at compile time. So
how
The first round of Community Review for DIP 1016, "ref T accepts
r-values", has begun. To participate, please visit the review
thread for the details:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/xoiyfeudgibxtbywx...@forum.dlang.org
*Please leave all feedback in the review thread rather than here!*
Thanks!
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1016, "ref T accepts r-values":
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/725541d69149bc85a9492f7df07360f8e2948bd7/DIPs/DIP1016.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP should
occur in this thread. The
On Friday, 20 July 2018 at 04:31:38 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote:
I don't have MSVC, so I built it using mingw, which generated a
.a lib.
I shall google some more, as I understand it DMD -m64 uses
Mingw libs as a fall back when MSVC not found, I compiled Lua
using mingw, I can't be too much
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 21:43:35 UTC, Jordan Wilson wrote:
Is there any way I can generate the appropriate lib?
Else I think I'll need to get hold of the proper import libs
that come with the Lua distribution.
Lua is extremely easy to build. That will generate the import lib
for
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 at 00:27:58 UTC, Entity325 wrote:
So I'm using the standard process:
DerelictGL3.load();
glContext = SDL_GL_CreateContext(sdlWindow);
GLVersion glVersion = DerelictGL3.reload();
About 1/3 of the time, the program hangs on the 3rd line and
never gets past it.
Thanks to the sponsorship of Symmetry Investments, the D Language
Foundation is happy to announce the Symmetry Autumn of Code!
We're looking for three university students to hack on D this
autumn, from September - January. We're also in search of
potential mentors and ideas for student
As promised in my tweet of June 30 (and to the handful of people
who emailed me), the cloud of mystery surrounding the use of the
money raised for code-d and its supporting tools has now been
(partially) lifted!
In this post, I lay out the details of how the first $1000 will
be paid out to
I'm very happy to announce the next Seoul D meetup on August 9 at
7:00 pm. We're partnering with local company BlockchainOS and the
Meetup group 'Learn Teach Code Seoul' for an interactive
'Introduction to D' presentation/tutorial followed by an hour of
coding challenges. BlockchainOS is
On Wednesday, 11 July 2018 at 22:46:02 UTC, Ali wrote:
there is not two options to donate online
1. Donate through OpenCollective
2. Donate through PayPal
are they the same thing, does the money, end up going to the
same group, same activities or are they different
It all goes to the same
On Thursday, 5 July 2018 at 12:52:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I remember there being a project for qt for D a long time ago.
I think this is it: http://www.dsource.org/projects/qtd
You may find some way to resurrect this.
And QtE5 is still active. He announced support for QML not
On Wednesday, 4 July 2018 at 10:03:57 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.081.0.
This release comes with...
http://dlang.org/download.html
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.081.0.html
- -Martin
The blog announcement:
https://dlang.org/blog/2018/07/04/dmd-2-081-0-released/
Reddit:
On Tuesday, 3 July 2018 at 14:42:58 UTC, Flaze07 wrote:
On Tuesday, 3 July 2018 at 14:32:01 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Resources allocated for the process will be released on exit.
I see...but it is dependant on the OS right ? because I have
seen other stuff relating to malloc as well, there
On Tuesday, 3 July 2018 at 13:32:21 UTC, Chris M. wrote:
After hashing it out with some people on the Discord, I'm
fairly certain we narrowed it down to the 64-bit user32.lib
from mingw missing these functions.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19051
So are the mingw libs only
On Tuesday, 3 July 2018 at 10:56:26 UTC, Flaze07 wrote:
hmm, I assume you know about DSFML, so... i.e
void main( string args[] ) {
auto win = new RenderWindow( VideoMode( 400, 400 ),
"resource leak ?" );
win.close();
}
//in this context, is there any memory leak ? because I saw
On Tuesday, 3 July 2018 at 07:29:12 UTC, Flaze07 wrote:
class RenderWindow {
private sfRenderWindow* _window;
public {
this() {
_window = sfRenderWindow_create(/*parameters*/);
}
//couple of other functions
~this() {
On Tuesday, 3 July 2018 at 05:52:40 UTC, Ecstatic Coder wrote:
I mean, you should offer a short panel of D enhancement
projects, with their precise goal, minimum bugdet and
investment time limit (for instance one year to reach the
required budget), plus an ordered list of additional
On Monday, 2 July 2018 at 23:00:08 UTC, Chris M. wrote:
On Monday, 2 July 2018 at 21:20:26 UTC, Seb wrote:
I thought for 64-bit the bundled lld linker and mingw runtime
are used?
https://dlang.org/changelog/2.079.0.html#lld_mingw
So in fact you shouldn't even need DMC?
Ah, okay. I'm mostly
On Monday, 2 July 2018 at 09:42:36 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
I think it's because of "If a constructor's code contains a
delegate constructor call, all possible execution paths through
the constructor must make exactly one delegate constructor call"
But, how am I supposed to call the
On Friday, 29 June 2018 at 11:54:48 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I don't, I think it would be a huge improvement. There are very
few benefits to getting people together in person in our
hyperconnected age, and while "key developers in the same
place" may be one of those, that excludes almost everybody
On Friday, 29 June 2018 at 10:18:01 UTC, Michael wrote:
On Friday, 29 June 2018 at 10:12:28 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
I can tell you that DConf Asia is something the Foundation is
interested in. It's also something I plan to work toward
making happen eventually. We discussed this at our Seoul
On Friday, 29 June 2018 at 09:58:50 UTC, 鲜卑拓跋枫 wrote:
Yes, the Sponsors should be the major problem for holding DConf
Asia.
I will try to collect the info if any Chinese programmer
organizations
or companies are interested in it. Please people from other
countries in
Asia help to do the
On Wednesday, 27 June 2018 at 07:28:07 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 June 2018 at 07:26:20 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/hwscnvmtrzfcfnppd...@forum.dlang.org
And I've pasted the wrong link here. The correct thread link is
this one:
On Wednesday, 27 June 2018 at 07:26:20 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/hwscnvmtrzfcfnppd...@forum.dlang.org
And I've pasted the wrong link here. The correct thread link is
this one:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/ipidsodqhgazrfvzh...@forum.dlang.org
Thanks!
The last chance for community feedback on DIP 1014, "Hooking D's
struct move semantics", is now underway. Please do not leave any
feedback in this thread, but rather in the review thread in the
General forum:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/hwscnvmtrzfcfnppd...@forum.dlang.org
Also, please be
On Wednesday, 27 June 2018 at 07:13:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Thanks in advance for your participation.
For those of you using the NNTP or mailing list interfaces, this
is the thread to respond in. Thanks!
DIP 1014, "Hooking D's struct move semantics", is now ready for
final review. This is a last chance for community feedback before
the DIP is handed off to Walter and Andrei for the Formal
Assessment. Please read the procedures document for details on
what is expected in this review stage:
DIP 1014, "Hooking D's struct move semantics", is now ready for
final review. This is a last chance for community feedback before
the DIP is handed off to Walter and Andrei for the Formal
Assessment. Please read the procedures document for details on
what is expected in this review stage:
On Thursday, 7 June 2018 at 06:22:04 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1013, "The Deprecation Process", is now ready for final
review. This is a last chance for community feedback before the
DIP is handed off to Walter and Andrei for the Formal
Assessment. Please read the procedures document for
1201 - 1300 of 2773 matches
Mail list logo
