On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 01:26:18 UTC, Alexander Bothe
wrote:
Okay, just implemented a completion mode for method overrides.
I won't explain this over here, as there are screenshots
depicting everything properly already :-)
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 08:40:04 UTC, evilrat wrote:
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 01:26:18 UTC, Alexander Bothe
wrote:
Okay, just implemented a completion mode for method overrides.
I won't explain this over here, as there are screenshots
depicting everything properly already :-)
Nice, hope the code is prettier than your speech. :D
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Orvid King blah38...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I wrote the code for this a while back, and although it was
originally intended as a replacement for just std.json (thus the repo
name), it does have the
On Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 22:56:38 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
so I'm releasing it as std.serialization.
What does that even mean? I'm pretty sure you should NEVER call a
library std.something if it hasn't been approved for inclusion
into standard library.
Other than that, nice work.
1100110 wrote in message news:tjgimnoqoflzrcrlw...@forum.dlang.org...
I'm offering a $50 bounty on this.
(Preferably Bitcoins, but I'll use bountysource if desired.)
I'd say just put it on bountysource, because then there's more chance others
will add to it.
rules:
Has to be called
Orvid King wrote in message news:ntpjdeutsxqicjywt...@forum.dlang.org...
(except for float-string
conversion, which I don't understand the algorithms enough to
implement myself) even going so far as to create an output range
based version of to!string(int/uint/long/ulong/etc.).
On 2/14/14, 5:10, Daniel Murphy wrote:
1100110 wrote in message news:tjgimnoqoflzrcrlw...@forum.dlang.org...
I'm offering a $50 bounty on this.
(Preferably Bitcoins, but I'll use bountysource if desired.)
I'd say just put it on bountysource, because then there's more chance
others will add
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 11:28:30 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
I thought that would be best, unfortunately.
Bitcoins are nice, but bountysource is the way to go. It's both
more official and easier to contribute to the bounty.
I'd be fine with the switch being name -nodruntime, and
honestly I
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 05:32:12 UTC, Asman01 wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 February 2014 at 04:46:41 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
Barely running but already fun and a little useful.
Example:
D import std.algorithm, std.array, std.file;
= std
D auto name(T)(T t) {
| return t.name;
| }
= name
D
On 2/14/14, 5:45, Daniel Murphy wrote:
1100110 wrote in message news:ldkuku$1sgt$1...@digitalmars.com...
I don't think we'll ever please everyone here. All I'm really trying
to do by specifying the name is prevent some cutesy annoying name.
It's pretty hard to get a pull request in with a
On Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 22:56:38 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
Wow, that went a bit more towards a salesman-like description
than I as aiming for, so I'll just end this here and give you
the link, before this ends up looking like a massive, badly
written, sales pitch :D
On 2/14/14, 5:42, Francesco Cattoglio wrote:
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 11:28:30 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
I thought that would be best, unfortunately.
Bitcoins are nice, but bountysource is the way to go. It's both more
official and easier to contribute to the bounty.
Meh, I just have a lot
1100110 wrote in message news:ldl2pf$20b0$1...@digitalmars.com...
I want a way to disable the GC, and have the compiler verify that no GC
allocations may occur.
I want a way to disable Exceptions, and have the compiler verify that no
Exceptions may occur.
Good, this is what I had in
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 12:39:11 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
Can you name anything I'm missing?
* no module info
* no runtime type info
* treat TLS as __gshared for single threaded programs
Mike
On 2/14/14, 7:09, Daniel Murphy wrote:
1100110 wrote in message news:ldl2pf$20b0$1...@digitalmars.com...
I want a way to disable the GC, and have the compiler verify that no
GC allocations may occur.
I want a way to disable Exceptions, and have the compiler verify that
no Exceptions may
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 11:58:43 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
auto twice = (int a) = 2*a;
twice(2);
What's wrong with that?
Drop the semicolon after twice(2)
Yeah, with a semicolon it's a statement, so it doesn't have any
result value to print.
Without the semicolon it's an expression.
1100110 wrote in message news:ldl6v6$255r$1...@digitalmars.com...
I dont know enough about TLS to comment really. Thoughts?
It's probably platform dependent, I guess it should work everywhere that C
supports TLS.
Dynamic cast can be disabled.
Sure, but should it be an error or be
On 2/14/14, 8:07, Daniel Murphy wrote:
1100110 wrote in message news:ldl6v6$255r$1...@digitalmars.com...
I dont know enough about TLS to comment really. Thoughts?
It's probably platform dependent, I guess it should work everywhere that
C supports TLS.
Dynamic cast can be disabled.
Sure,
1100110 wrote in message news:ldl9fj$28g6$1...@digitalmars.com...
I don't think it's worth throwing out assert over. A runtime that
supported assert + Object would be about 8 lines and would IMO be
worthwhile.
But then where do we stop?
This is why I think it's an excellent idea to have
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:46:19 -0500, Adam D. Ruppe
destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 15:34:16 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think classes heavily depend on druntime, I believe Walter was
indicating they would not be allowed (which trivially excludes class
Steven Schveighoffer wrote in message
news:op.xa929juueav7ka@stevens-macbook-pro.local...
static this/~this is tougher. If it is possible for it to work, then
it should. I feel that this is more of a language feature.
These might work with init sections, but maybe not.
No, static
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 11:22:22 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Orvid King wrote in message
news:ntpjdeutsxqicjywt...@forum.dlang.org...
(except for float-string conversion, which I don't understand
the algorithms enough to implement myself) even going so far
as to create an output range
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 10:41:54 UTC, Francesco Cattoglio
wrote:
On Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 22:56:38 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
so I'm releasing it as std.serialization.
What does that even mean? I'm pretty sure you should NEVER call
a library std.something if it hasn't been approved
I don't think, everything should be done by the compiler. Most
trouble with gc is that its usage can't be traced similar to tls,
so the feature will be diagnostics similar to -vtls option, say,
-vminimal. The compiler can write the trace of runtime usage in
machine-readable format to stdout
On 2014-02-13 23:56, Orvid King wrote:
Well, I wrote the code for this a while back, and although it was
originally intended as a replacement for just std.json (thus the repo
name), it does have the framework in place to be a generalized
serialization framework, and there is the start of xml,
On 2014-02-14 14:50, 1100110 wrote:
This does come with a cost.
I dont know enough about TLS to comment really. Thoughts?
Dynamic cast can be disabled.
static this/~this is tougher. If it is possible for it to work, then it
should.
This requires ModuleInfo, if I recall correctly.
On 2014-02-14 15:07, Daniel Murphy wrote:
It's probably platform dependent, I guess it should work everywhere that
C supports TLS.
Well, on OS X it's natively supported on since 10.7 but DMD still uses
emulated TLS:
Dynamic cast can be disabled.
Sure, but should it be an error or be
On 2014-02-14 16:42, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I'm 90% sure that MacOS does not natively support TLS, and uses the
core.Thread class to store it.
OS X support TLS natively since 10.7, but DMD still uses emulated TLS on
OS X.
Yes, this also depends on moduleinfo, like static ctor/dtor.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:39:24 -0500, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2014-02-14 16:42, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I'm 90% sure that MacOS does not natively support TLS, and uses the
core.Thread class to store it.
OS X support TLS natively since 10.7, but DMD still uses emulated TLS on
On 2014-02-14 22:02, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
That's... old. Why doesn't DMD start using it? 10.7 came out in 2011.
It wasn't that old until recently, when 10.9 was released. It's the same
as with everything else. Someone just have to commit time and implement
it. I guess this is a bit
On Tuesday, 11 February 2014 at 04:46:41 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Barely running but already fun and a little useful.
Example:
D import std.algorithm, std.array, std.file;
= std
D auto name(T)(T t) {
| return t.name;
| }
= name
D dirEntries(., SpanMode.depth).map!name.join(, )
=
On Thursday, 13 February 2014 at 23:14:20 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
I think it's about time I gave back to this wonderful community.
I'm offering a $50 bounty on this.
(Preferably Bitcoins, but I'll use bountysource if desired.)
rules:
Has to be called -minimal
Has to fulfill Walter's original post.
Denis Koroskin wrote in message
news:wjdvvungwvpemwmxl...@forum.dlang.org...
I'll throw in $300 extra (maybe more), but can you please first
formalize the requirements (list of flags, and what each flag
should mean, required unittests to pass etc).
Required unittests are very helpful,
On Saturday, 15 February 2014 at 04:13:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
1. Disable Garbage Collector (suggestion: -nogc)
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1886
3. Disable ModuleInfo (suggestion: -nomoduleinfo)
dmd -betterC though note
On 2/14/14, 22:20, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 15 February 2014 at 04:13:49 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
1. Disable Garbage Collector (suggestion: -nogc)
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1886
Oh dmd! Why won't you build on my computer!? Why!?
3. Disable ModuleInfo
On Saturday, 15 February 2014 at 04:34:30 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
Is it just ModuleInfo, or...?
Yeah, that's pretty much all it actually does, and it isn't quite
complete - array bounds checking for example won't work because
they depend on module info.
But I don't think they should depend on
On 2/14/14, 22:44, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 15 February 2014 at 04:34:30 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
Is it just ModuleInfo, or...?
Yeah, that's pretty much all it actually does, and it isn't quite
complete - array bounds checking for example won't work because they
depend on module info.
On Saturday, 15 February 2014 at 04:55:32 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
Then what I actually want is for -betterC to be cleaned up and
renamed (and Documented!)
BTW I did *not* actually use -betterC for my minimal.zip. I've
been playing with it a bit recently to make an even more minimal
thing, but
Daniel Murphy, el 14 de February a las 22:10 me escribiste:
1100110 wrote in message news:tjgimnoqoflzrcrlw...@forum.dlang.org...
I'm offering a $50 bounty on this.
(Preferably Bitcoins, but I'll use bountysource if desired.)
I'd say just put it on bountysource, because then there's more
39 matches
Mail list logo
