On 3/27/2015 1:35 PM, weaselcat wrote:
there's a difference between minimalism and blatantly not adopting core advances
in language design over the past 40 years.
Yes, and there's also a difference between gratuitous complexity and finding the
underlying simplicity.
It's a tricky thing
On 3/27/2015 2:47 PM, weaselcat wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 20:58:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/27/2015 1:35 PM, weaselcat wrote:
there's a difference between minimalism and blatantly not adopting core advances
in language design over the past 40 years.
Yes, and there's also
On 3/26/2015 3:53 PM, ketmar wrote:
filling bugs like this huge project not compiling! is not working, as
nobody wants to run dustmite on such projects, people just waiting for
issue author to provide more information.
Realistically, people who want to work on bug fixing are going to work on
On 3/26/2015 8:53 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
It's also the view of Feynman, not to mention many great minds of the past. Ie
it is limiting to insist on data before forming a strong opinion about something
(which is not to say that one may not change one's mind in the face of contrary
data).
On 3/26/2015 7:06 PM, weaselcat wrote:
vibe has (experimental?) green threads, doesn't it?
I don't keep up with vibe, so I may be wrong.
I don't know, but if it does have good 'uns they should be moved into Phobos!
On 3/26/2015 1:44 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
I know it's a bit unfair in places and it's got a click bait title but who
cares? I got my point across and I think people understand where i'm coming
from. It seems to have got really popular and I've been swamped with mail, etc.
I think it's the
On 3/26/2015 12:40 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
(Almost) All publicity is good publicity.
I attended a presentation at NWCPP on Go last week. I have never written a Go
program, so filter my opinion on that.
It seems to me that every significant but one feature of Go
On 3/25/2015 1:07 AM, thedeemon wrote:
I don't see any mention of DIP25 here (Sealed references - return ref arguments
etc.). Was it implemented and included in this release?
Yes.
On 3/24/2015 10:58 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Arch Linux packages have been uploaded.
I am very grateful to Martin for handling this release. It was done very
professionally and thanks to beta discussions/testing we did some great
breakthrough in release stability by providing deprecation paths for
On 3/23/2015 8:01 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
No. It sounds like what's probably needed is to find ways to encourage
sponsorship, and for that to work, we probably need to spread knowledge of D
further so that its adoption grows, and charging for the online content
On 3/22/2015 3:33 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sunday, 22 March 2015 at 07:11:05 UTC, Suliman wrote:
Could you explain why pure vibed do not good for static files?
It's mainly a replacement for `python -m SimpleHTTPServer`, and is just a very
small tool around vibe.d's serveStaticFiles, which
On 3/19/2015 4:41 AM, Suliman wrote:
My friend Ruslan wrote pretty big doc for D-noobs about using D.
It's pretty much inspired by Ali book (thanks Ali!) but not so big. I hope that
doc will help to newcomers to start programming.
Any feed back are welcome!
On 3/17/2015 12:34 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
dfmt 0.2.0 is available at
https://github.com/Hackerpilot/dfmt/releases/tag/v0.2.0.
dfmt is a formatter for D source code.
Version 0.2.0 fixes several bugs and includes improved line wrapping logic. The
project now has 85 regression test cases and is
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2yt1ek/andrei_alexandrescu_on_d_at_yow2014_local_imports/
On 3/12/2015 1:46 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
On Thursday, 12 March 2015 at 20:39:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2yt1ek/andrei_alexandrescu_on_d_at_yow2014_local_imports/
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mdsh5n$2kta$1...@digitalmars.com
http
On 3/8/2015 12:51 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
dfmt is a source code formatter for D. v0.1.3 fixes 34 issues from v0.1.2.
The codename is inspired by somebody who may or may not* have filed 45 Github
issues, 20 of them in a single day.
Pretty dazz!
On 3/6/2015 10:43 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
The difficulty here is turning a personal preference into a social
orthodoxy.
A consistent style is necessary for Phobos. For your own projects, D doesn't
dictate any particular style.
On 3/6/2015 1:48 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
The serious answer is that there's a lot of special casing that I'm still trying
to figure out.
Ah. I had thought that maybe there was an obvious algorithm I didn't think of!
On 3/6/2015 2:47 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
I'd like to hear your definition of simple.
It's easy to understand, and one could write one from scratch over a weekend.
I haven't done any statistics, but I'd bet that that parse.c lexer.c are among
the most stable parts of dmd judging by change
On 3/6/2015 1:54 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
On Friday, 6 March 2015 at 09:39:13 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
True, but on the other hand, a D lexer and parser are pretty simple.
Did you mean simple compared to C++?
It's simple in both absolute terms and relative to C++ terms. It's not as simple
On 3/6/2015 11:55 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
The core problem here is teletype, monospace font thinking. Using a
proper proportional font for you code and you rapidly lose the need for
all this alignment stuff.
Real point but expressed as a bit of a troll, mostly to
On 3/6/2015 2:31 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Remember a tab is not a number of spaces, it is semantic markup.
All I can say is good luck with that. ASCII is not a markup language, and trying
to reinvent it as one is doomed to failure.
I can also say from experience
On 3/5/2015 7:15 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
You probably feel that way because tabs are better. dfmt only defaults to spaces
because that's what's in the Phobos style guide.
Spaces are used in Phobos because no two tools agree on what the tab size
should be.
On 3/3/2015 3:03 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
dfmt works by re-using my existing lexer and parser. The parser is run on the
code first so that the formatting step knows a few things like the difference
between the binary and unary forms of *. Line splitting is figured out using a
badly mangled
On 3/5/2015 1:04 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
It would be good if the D implemented D parser were though. Parsing to
create an AST is needed for many things. If each tool in the tool
chain implements it's own… it just seems wrong.
True, but on the other hand, a D lexer
On 3/3/2015 1:15 PM, notna wrote:
not sure if someone should inform them about the DMD name clash... or just enjoy
the popularity ;)
http://www.gnu.org/software/dmd
I sent them a note.
On 2/19/2015 6:21 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
dfmt is a D source code formatting tool.
https://github.com/Hackerpilot/dfmt/
https://github.com/Hackerpilot/dfmt/releases/tag/v0.1.0
Thanks for doing this. It's an important part of the D toolchain we need to
have. At some point I want to merge it
On 3/2/2015 11:08 AM, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
Unfortunately our organizational proposal for the 2015 Google Summer of Code was
rejected. Thanks to everyone who helped out on this, especially to those who
volunteered to mentor.
I've asked Google to provide me with feedback, and I will post that
On 2/19/2015 2:06 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 February 2015 at 14:13:25 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Find more information on the dmd-beta mailing list.
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/54e41ca2.4060...@dawg.eu
Many of the beta-2 files are missing from downloads.dlang.org, and all of
On 2/18/2015 6:13 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Find more information on the dmd-beta mailing list.
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/54e41ca2.4060...@dawg.eu
Thank you, Martin!
On 2/17/2015 9:02 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Guess I better find out what AsciiDoc is then. Wee, it has macros:
http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/asciidoc.css-embedded.html#_macros
Ddoc leads the way in innovation again!
On 2/16/2015 3:07 PM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
[0] https://leanpub.com/ctfe
Thank you. I bought my copy!
On 2/4/2015 1:17 PM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
One interesting anecdote: somebody in a financial services company gave an
account of giving D a try as a way to prototype something quickly, intending to
rewrite it later in a more conventional language. The prototype went straight
into production, and
On 2/7/2015 1:45 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 11:14:28 UTC, Ben wrote:
The next Berlin D Meetup will be happening on Friday the 20th of February at
19:30. The venue will be Berlin Co-Op (http://co-up.de/) on the 3rd floor who
have the equipment for us to do
On 2/10/2015 1:50 PM, John Colvin wrote:
I didn't see it mentioned anywhere, so I presume there isn't any financial
assistance for travel costs for speakers this year. Is that correct?
It'll be the same as usual - airplane/car/hotel
On 2/4/2015 4:07 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please throw your hat in the air with me to hail the new czar! :o)
Congrats, Martin!
On 2/2/2015 3:56 AM, Omri Palmon wrote:
Weka.IO is proud to host a lecture about D, sharing our experience of
implementing a trailblazing distributed storage system in D.
Lecture will take place on Sunday, February 15th, 19:00, at Weka.IO offices,
Beit Shamai 10 Tel Aviv.
Please confirm your
On 1/29/2015 1:58 PM, Guillaume Chatelet wrote:
I pushed some code for string here (nothing fancy yet)
https://github.com/gchatelet/dlang_cpp_std/blob/master/cpp_std.d
The linker complains about missing
std::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar ::__ctor()
where it should
On 1/25/2015 9:15 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-25.html
Also available via RSS: http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/twid.rss
Awesome job (as usual!). Thanks, Adam!
On 1/23/2015 8:19 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
http://discuss.rust-lang.org/t/interfacing-d-to-legacy-c-code-a-summary-of-a-competing-languages-capabilities/1406
I'm amazed someone made the effort to transcribe the talk!
On 1/24/2015 1:32 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 23 January 2015 at 05:54:41 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/22/2015 12:52 PM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Me too, is there any video available?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkwaV6k6BmM
I can't bear to watch it, you'll have to do it for me
Mandatory reddit link:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2tdy5z/interfacing_d_to_legacy_c_code_by_walter_bright/
There's been a lot of interest in this topic.
On 1/22/2015 12:52 PM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 17:21:42 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 01:09:13 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 00:51:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/21/2015 4:42 AM, FrankLike wrote:
How about
On 1/22/2015 12:52 PM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Me too, is there any video available?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkwaV6k6BmM
I can't bear to watch it, you'll have to do it for me!
On 12/22/2014 3:14 PM, Elie Morisse wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have the pleasure to announce to you all the existence of a modified LDC able
to interface directly to C++ libraries, wiping out the need to write bindings:
https://github.com/Syniurge/Calypso
I think this is an exciting
On 1/21/2015 3:21 PM, Elie Morisse wrote:
I'm still working as fast as I can to get Ogre3D working. Ogre3D makes wide
usage of the standard C++ library so getting it running would be a milestone and
at that point most C++ libraries will be usable or in close reach as well. And
it'd also make a
On 1/21/2015 4:42 AM, FrankLike wrote:
How about the result?
??
On 1/16/2015 2:17 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Note: I didn't realize this originally, but when I booked my flight, the prices
are much higher than they should be, and less availability. I realized the
reason why -- Monday is Memorial Day in the US, just about everyone has it off.
Just a
On 1/13/2015 7:15 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
BTW one commented out section here is FAQs and blog posts. My plan there is to
highlight D.learn and SO questions that pop up a bunch and other, longer
articles people write. I just didn't have any this week so I left it out, but
hopefully we'll get
On 1/13/2015 6:08 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I've started writing a weekly D newsletter. Here's the first issue, any feedback
welcome!
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-12.html
In the future, I intend to have it written by Saturday for a weekend release, so
if you want something to appear
On 1/11/2015 4:24 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Feel free to send stuff to ACCU's CVu or Overload.
http://accu.org/index.php/journal
Good idea!
On 1/11/2015 12:17 PM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I digress, I will have to sit down and write some things up and we'll
see where I get.
Looking forward to it!
On 1/9/2015 10:37 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I encourage everyone to apply for visa as soon as possible. US visa process can
be frustratingly delayed depending on many unknown factors.
We've lost speakers in the past due to visa delays. I agree that it's never too
early to get this done.
On 1/10/2015 1:28 PM, weaselcat wrote:
Sorry for the off-topic noise, but where will you be publishing your articles
since Dr.Dobbs has closed?
Sorry if you have answered this elsewhere.
It's a good question. Dr. Dobb's has graciously given me permission to republish
them, and I'll post them
On 1/8/2015 2:21 AM, ponce wrote:
I've started a list of curated D tips and tricks here:
http://p0nce.github.io/d-idioms/
Anything that you wished you learned earlier at one point in the D world is
welcome to be added or suggested.
My contribution:
http://digitalmars.com/articles/b68.html
On 1/10/2015 9:50 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/10/15 9:49 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/10/15 8:15 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
In any event, are you doing flash talks this year? I don't think I
could find something to spend more than 15 minutes talking about
On 1/8/2015 8:42 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:31:37 Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
On 6 January 2015 at 23:24, Andrei Alexandrescu via
Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
Hello,
Exciting
On 1/6/2015 11:42 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-07 05:06, Walter Bright wrote:
I've wanted to do this for a while. The Ddoc macro system should work on
any piece of text you'd like to add macro support to.
http://digitalmars.com/sargon/textmac.html
Hmm, I wonder how good name textmac
On 1/7/2015 12:06 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wednesday, January 07, 2015 07:37:10 Mengu via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
is it crazy to think that there are some people somewhere who
can't stand D and anything D related?
Well, _I_ wouldn't want to see a D on my
On 1/7/2015 11:05 AM, Maxime Chevalier-Boisvert wrote:
We'd like your presentation proposal, too!
It's an honor to be reinvited :)
I'm honored you're a member of our community. Truly the best thing about working
on D is the type of people it attracts.
Are there specific topics you'd
On 1/7/2015 3:46 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I guess those where the times when unmount has been abbreviated to umount.
Typing must have been really hard.
It had to do with file extensions for macro assembler being .MAC, and people
just wound up calling them mac files.
Just like people call
On 1/6/2015 1:37 AM, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
I have a bit similar project - lexer for D written in D.
Written just based on Lexical documentation page.
https://github.com/buggins/ddc
Trying make it fast and to do as few memory allocations as possible.
Should also make it available on
I've wanted to do this for a while. The Ddoc macro system should work on any
piece of text you'd like to add macro support to.
http://digitalmars.com/sargon/textmac.html
On 1/6/2015 8:42 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
Maybe add a link to the existing documentation for how to use Ddoc so newbies
don't have to search for it?
good idea
On 1/6/2015 10:08 PM, Maxime Chevalier-Boisvert wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 00:21:55 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Reddit downvotes seem to be the most arbitrary things on the Internet. I don't
understand them at all.
r/programming seems to be have become fairly hostile to new
On 1/5/2015 5:39 PM, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
That's really funny that this is your topic. I was planning on going a blog post
on almost the exact same thing.
I really wish I could come and see it but I don't know how bad busing out there
would be. :(
There is good bus service to the Microsoft
On 1/5/2015 5:31 AM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Will audio be available afterwards?
NWCPP usually will post the video afterwards.
At a slight tangent, has anything more recent been written on the C++
interface? I understand it is more complete than what is described on the
Wiki/at dlang.org and
http://nwcpp.org/
All are invited.
Now I just have to write the presentation :-(
On 1/4/2015 5:07 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
I've created a dub package for the D version of DMD's lexer, generated
automatically from the C++ source.
github: https://github.com/yebblies/ddmd
dub: http://code.dlang.org/packages/ddmd
Great! Thank you!
On 12/28/2014 1:13 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I just noticed they temporarily reduced the price of my book:
https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/d-cookbook
If you haven't gotten a copy yet, start off the new year right! :)
I already bought the hardcopy, but I noticed I could get
On 12/27/2014 1:32 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 24 Dec 2014 22:20, Vic via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
mailto:digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote:
http://teespring.com/d-lang-sv
Non profit, I hope other follow suit.
I like
On 12/26/2014 10:25 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.wired.com/2014/12/wired-enterprise-year/
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2qioj8/dlang_story_makes_wireds_10_most_hardcore_tech/
On 12/27/2014 7:36 AM, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Saturday, 27 December 2014 at 11:15:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/26/2014 10:25 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.wired.com/2014/12/wired-enterprise-year/
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2qioj8
http://www.wired.com/2014/12/wired-enterprise-year/
On 12/25/2014 9:55 AM, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
Ported from r-project:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/bessel
Nice! Thank you.
I hope this is the start of more R code being ported!
ARR R R R R R R R Rrrr -- Mr. Krabs
On 12/24/2014 2:20 PM, Vic wrote:
RSVP:
http://www.meetup.com/D-Lang-Sillicon-Valley/events/219413448/
Wish I could attend!
On 12/15/2014 2:25 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
- Removed the unrelated Turkish menu from the English pages
- Improved the ebook formats
- Removed the download page and linked the ebook versions directly from the main
page instead
I consider these beta quality:
http://ddili.org/ders/d.en/
(I
On 12/18/2014 11:26 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
So, it is readable on your Kindle, right?
Haven't checked.
Have you noticed the book does not have any foreword? ;)
Looking at my shoe ...
http://code.dlang.org/packages/sargon
These two modules failed to generate much interest in incorporating them into
Phobos, but I'm still rather proud of them :-)
Here they are:
◦sargon.lz77 - algorithms to compress and expand with LZ77 compression algorithm
◦sargon.halffloat - IEEE 754
On 12/3/2014 1:32 PM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
thank you. but i mean that dsource.org is still poping up in results
and it contains alot of obsolete projects. some projects was forked
long time ago and their dsource pages weren't updated, some are just
dead. people keep hitting
On 12/3/2014 2:42 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Violence is not the answer.
I'll look into adding a warning banner to the site template.
Alternatively, replace the pages in dsource with forwarding pages. The page
forwarded to can have two links - one to the original page, the other to the
On 12/2/2014 2:20 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
DSource in the headlines? In 2014? Shocking, I know.
Since Brad is no longer an active D user, and the website has had spotty uptime
lately, I've offered to take over the hosting and any maintenance.
Although opinions exist that the site should
On 12/1/2014 4:33 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Monday, 1 December 2014 at 07:53:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Well, I had tagged 1.0.0, then fixed a problem :-)
Well 1.0.0 is reserved for the first stable release, usually you'd begin with
0.1.0 or so.
Good idea BTW.
Since these are former
On 12/1/2014 2:19 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
This was a great idea.
Aw, shucks! :-)
http://code.dlang.org/packages/undead
https://github.com/DigitalMars/undeaD
In upgrading old D code, one time consuming aspect is reworking code that
depends on old Phobos modules that have been taken out behind the woodshed and
shot. Sometimes, there's significantly more work involved than
You guys are working on a lot of great stuff that'll make for very interesting
talks.
http://softwarearchitecturecon.com/sa2015
Proposals are due Dec. 2. I'm submitting mine - see you there!
On 11/30/2014 11:43 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-12-01 05:07, Walter Bright wrote:
There wasn't significant work to get these modules up to date with the latest
compiler?
No, not much. bitarray took a bit longer, as it was a D1 module.
I'm new to dub, so if I botched that up, please do
On 11/24/2014 2:25 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
[...]
Excellent comments. Please post them on the reddit page!
On 11/24/2014 7:27 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D.
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2n9gfb/d_is_for_data_science/cmbn83i
Thought I'd post this as a counterpoint to the recent please break our code
thread.
On 11/24/2014 4:50 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 00:34:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Thought I'd post this as a counterpoint to the recent please break our code
thread.
I would caution against putting very much weight in Reddit opinions - there's
people who
On 11/19/2014 7:06 AM, Upvoter wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 November 2014 at 14:33:05 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I think the auto decoding in phobos was and is a mistake.
I agree when you say auto decoding is a good choice.
Uh-oh!
On 11/17/2014 4:41 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Second part on my series to reduce vibe.d turnaround time.
In this part we'll reduce compilation time by 60%.
https://code.dawg.eu/reducing-vibed-turnaround-time-part-2-less-compiling.html
-Martin
Should say in the title that you reduced build times
On 11/17/2014 4:41 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Second part on my series to reduce vibe.d turnaround time.
In this part we'll reduce compilation time by 60%.
https://code.dawg.eu/reducing-vibed-turnaround-time-part-2-less-compiling.html
-Martin
There's no mention of your name as author in the
On 11/18/2014 1:08 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 11/18/2014 08:34 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Should say in the title that you reduced build times by 60%. Otherwise,
have to read all the way to the end to find it!
It's a great statistic, and having it in the title people will have more
reason
On 11/13/2014 4:48 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We've just announced the first-ever O'Reilly Software Architecture Conference
and want to make sure it's on your radar. It's happening at the Hynes
Convention Center in Boston, March 17-19, 2015.
Especially those who gave presentations at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvdoIJaPooI
On reddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2iws85/interview_with_andrei_alexandrescu_on_the_d/
On 10/11/2014 3:59 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
You can use different mechanisms in different OSs. There is no need to
force a runtime to be OS-independent. If that were the case, then we
should close the concurrent GC pull request now.
I still don't see why it can't use a special argument to
On 10/11/2014 4:23 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
It basically defines a bunch of environment variables and run the
binary. This is a super common practice in posix systems. We are not
inventing anything here. I don't know how windows or other OSs deal with
defining environment variables in a
On 10/10/2014 12:37 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
It was my impression that phobos in a shared library would soon become the
default on linux, i.e. any application would use it by default. In that case,
all supported GCs might actually have to be included in the shared library.
The options to
On 10/10/2014 5:45 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I still don't understand why wouldn't we use environment variables for
what they've been created for, it's foolish :-)
Because using environment variables to tune program X will also affect programs
A-Z.
901 - 1000 of 2363 matches
Mail list logo
