On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 22:32:06 UTC, Trent Forkert wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 March 2015 at 21:49:17 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
Why is it insufficient? You don't have to use DUB to the
exclusion of everything else. Isn't the use of the
preGenerateCommands
(http://code.dlang.org/package-fo
On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 14:45:08 UTC, Trent Forkert wrote:
On Thursday, 19 March 2015 at 11:18:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I call dub from makefile rules and feel pretty comfortable
about such pattern (apart from being not-so-portable compared
to raw dub). And building anything via IDE is
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 15:47:09 UTC, Trent Forkert wrote:
On Friday, 20 March 2015 at 14:36:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I wasn't referring to the vim vs IDE holy debate. I often use
IDE myself but never use interal build systems tied to IDE -
mostly for portability reasons. It is good to
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 13:40:04 UTC, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Different flags to
different source files?
If you mean separate compilation with different flags per module
and linking into same binary - it is pretty much illegal in D and
can only be done at own risk. I don't know if it is mentio
On Monday, 23 March 2015 at 15:30:43 UTC, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 14:04:30 +, Dicebot via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
If you mean separate compilation with different flags per
module and linking into same binary - it is pretty much
illegal in D and can only be done at
Arch Linux packages have been uploaded.
I am very grateful to Martin for handling this release. It was
done very professionally and thanks to beta discussions/testing
we did some great breakthrough in release stability by providing
deprecation paths for several non-critical bug fixes. Also som
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 18:59:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 3/24/15 2:18 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
One way to improve this would be to have changelogs in the
dmd/druntime/phobos repo and make the entries part of the pull
requests.
+1000
-Steve
Yes, sounds reasonable. Those c
Quick report : it has happened and it was pretty intense :)
Martin Nowak has given a great talk explaining D garbage
collector and recent improvements to it. I presume some of that
material will be present in his DConf talk too - looking forward
to hearing it again. Getting everything right str
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 14:42:44 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 March 2015 at 23:00:56 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
Congrats to everyone involved !
A special thanks to Martin, that helped a lot to get Vibe.d
ready for 2.067, and reverted the problematic changes when we
realiz
On Tuesday, 17 March 2015 at 12:39:00 UTC, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Definitely. I've now made a branch "linux" on github where
linux compiles and links successfully and that also includes
steps towards abstracting stuff.
Thanks a lot. Sadly this branch still doesn't seem to compile
because of oth
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 14:18:33 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 12:15:03 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
distribution across the cores, but in most scenarios the
number of concurrent tasks should be high enough to keep all
cores busy anyhow. There are also additional c
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 15:28:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
No... E.g.:
On the same thread:
1. fiber A receives request and queries DB (async)
2. fiber B computes for 1 second
3. fiber A sends response.
Latency: 1 second even if all the other threads are free.
This is a problem of ha
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 16:11:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Not a broken design. If I have to run multiple servers just to
handle an image upload or generating a PDF then you are driving
up the cost of the project and developers would be better off
with a different platform?
You can
On Saturday, 28 March 2015 at 14:33:14 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 12:52 +0100, Sönke Ludwig via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[…]
You can access TLS from an event callback just as easy as from
a fiber.
[…]
TLS is the evil here. Anyone working with TLS is either writing
On Saturday, 28 March 2015 at 19:16:32 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
If you write your software to fit a particular platform,
including
hardware features, then you are writing an operating system
dedicated
to that one specific platform and no other.
Yes and I believe writing dedicated specialized
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:03:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
. Separate compilation. One file changes, only one file gets
rebuilt
This immediately has caught my eye as huge "no" in the
description. We must ban C style separate compilation, there is
simply no way to move forward otherwise. At t
Also I don't see any point in yet another meta build system. The
very point of initial discussion was about getting D only
cross-platform solution that won't require installing any
additional software but working D compiler.
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:17:50 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:13:41 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Also I don't see any point in yet another meta build system.
The very point of initial discussion was about getting D only
cross-platform solution that won't require
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:25:51 UTC, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 17:10:31 +, Dicebot via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:03:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> . Separate compilation. One file changes, only one file gets
> rebuilt
This immed
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:22:42 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:10:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:03:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
. Separate compilation. One file changes, only one file gets
rebuilt
This immediately has caught my eye as huge &qu
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:59:22 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Well, I took your advice (and one of my acceptance tests is
based off of your simplified real-work example) and started
with the low-level any-command-will-do API first. I built the
high-level ones on top of that. It doesn't seem crazy
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 18:06:42 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
All I know is I've seen a definite improvement in my
edit-compile-unittest cycle by compiling modules separately.
How would the decoupling happen? Is the user supposed to
partition the binary into suitable static libraries? Or is the
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:08:58 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
I just tried compiling one of my project. It has a makefile
that does separate compilation and a shell script I use for
unit testing which compiles everything in one go. The makefile
takes 5.3 seconds, does not including linking since it
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 16:58:23 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 17:55:00 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Complicates whole-program optimization possibilities. Old
school object files are simply not good enough to preserve
information necessary to produce optimized builds and we are
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 07:44:12 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:54:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:08:58 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
I just tried compiling one of my project. It has a makefile
that does separate compilation and a shell script I use
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 12:17:09 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Saturday, 4 April 2015 at 19:59:46 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
We need solutions that can be reasonably implemented with
existing resources, not perfect solutions. Storing IR in
object files and using custom linker is "correct" ap
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 12:50:52 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 12:22:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Unless LDC does some D specific WPO magic I am not aware of
this is not what your original statement was about.
llvm does normal WPO in a sense that compiled code is not
opaque
On Monday, 6 April 2015 at 11:29:20 UTC, Sergei Nosov wrote:
On Sunday, 5 April 2015 at 00:22:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
It seems to me that different projects might benefit from
different compilation strategies. It might just be a case of
unit tests alongside production code vs in separate fil
This will be an early preview of some stuff prepared for my DConf
talk. See you in Berlin!
Also slides from previous talk by Martin Nowak are public now :
https://code.dawg.eu/talks/2015-03-20-garbage_collection_dmeetup/#1
Side note : when updating Arch package to 2.067.1 I decided to
add `-L-lcurl` option to default `dmd.conf` in context of recent
discussion on topic. Please report if that causes any issues with
link order bugs - I couldn't trigger any but there are wild talse
running around that those exist ;)
On Monday, 27 April 2015 at 07:38:52 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Sunday, 26 April 2015 at 22:05:36 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Side note : when updating Arch package to 2.067.1 I decided to
add `-L-lcurl` option to default `dmd.conf` in context of
recent discussion on topic. Please report if that
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 19:23:32 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
Hi!
Any chance to change the YouTube settings? Here in Germany I
get only the message:
Live streaming is not available in your country due to rights
issues.
Regards,
Kai
The whole live streaming feature seems to be banned in Germa
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 21:05:23 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Dicebot, el 27 de May a las 19:26 me escribiste:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 19:23:32 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Any chance to change the YouTube settings? Here in Germany I
>get
>only the message:
>Liv
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 15:02:45 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AH35IxWkx8M
:-)
day 3 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA1exjdEIWw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA1exjdEIWw
Announced it on IRC too. And no, I won't ever use Twitter even
the whole fate of D will depend on it :grumpy:
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 23:42:00 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
DConf 2015 has been awesome, I'm taking a minute to post this
that's been announced a short while ago.
We're pleased to announce that DConf 2016 will take place in
Berlin, sponsored by Sociomantic.
We'll be back with details.
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 12:00:53 UTC, extrawurst wrote:
Thanks for the chance to be there! Even if I am dissapointed
with many decisions being made, the main thing is that D is
getting new users and new success stories. And DConf tells
those stories :)
Out of curiosity, what decisions are y
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 18:25:02 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 12:39:13 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On the other hand, AST macros have been officially rejected
and that I like a lot :)
Hi.
Just out of curiosity, what are the evils of AST macros (or
could you point me to
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 21:02:17 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 12:39:13 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
- Going for kitchen sink Phobos (and distributing vibe.d as
part of Phobos)
I thought we agreed to start with just Dub first.
"we"? :P
- Moving fibers betwe
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 19:44:12 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-06-02 20:28, Dicebot wrote:
- requires standard (and stable!) AST format
Is that a negative point? BTW, the compiler doesn't necessarily
need to use the same API for the AST internally as exposed
externally.
Looks promising so far. I will create separate issues in actual
repo for desired improvements.
https://github.com/atilaneves/reggae/issues
I think this is all I would want before considering to try reggae
as my main build system. Concept worked pretty good so far and I
feel very satisfied with what we can potentially get from it -
though, I must admit, I haven't tried to port any of mor
gdc
- now uses 5.1 gcc base and 2.066.1 frontend
- patched to correctly use system zlib library (resulted in
linker errors before)
dtools
- switched back to use dmd as default compiler
dub
- switched back to use dmd as default compiler
dcd
- new package, release 0.6.0
coming soon : Digger (later this week, debugging new package)
On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 15:09:02 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
Please fix description:
Compiler for D programming language which uses gcc backend
(2.065
frontend version)
should be
Compiler for D programming language which uses gcc backend
(2.066.1
frontend version)
or remove info about fron
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 11:28:41 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 09:53:34 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Remember that the forum software is just a frontend for an
nntp server and
that others view the content via nntp or via the mailing list.
So, it
doesn't make any sense to suppo
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 at 14:47:42 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:46:38 +
schrieb "Dicebot" :
- provides systemd service : `sudo systemctl enable
dcd.service` to start automatically upon system startup
- provides default /etc/dcd.conf with stdlib paths
On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 20:13:51 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:46:38 +
schrieb "Dicebot" :
- provides systemd service : `sudo systemctl enable
dcd.service` to start automatically upon system startup
Is it really a system-wide server? I can see how i
Formal review process for std.experimental.allocator has started,
please check
http://forum.dlang.org/post/vfipmwojmvseqxoiw...@forum.dlang.org
On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 14:47:36 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
coming soon : Digger (later this week, debugging new package)
I figured out I will need to make a pull request or two before
Digger can be properly integrated into the system. For now
created inofficial AUR package :
https://aur4
Thanks a lot for this huge effort. Quality of write ups is beyond
any expectations on my side - just reading it + looking at slides
gives a very solid understanding of what was talked about.
Andrei is back online and thus it is time to make a decision
about adding his allocator package
(http://forum.dlang.org/post/vfipmwojmvseqxoiw...@forum.dlang.org) to Phobos std.experimental
Docs:
http://erdani.com/d/phobos-prerelease/std_experimental_allocator.html
Code:
https://github.com/an
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:30:00 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
All released talks are on this playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL12FA104E02ABE730
I have also create playlist which includes only dconf 2015 videos
for easier sharing :
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEDeq48K
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 11:33:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Voting ends in 2 weeks, on July 22.
~1 week remains
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 11:33:03 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Voting ends in 2 weeks, on July 22.
Voting ends tomorrow. At this point it is almost impossible to
fail so it is up to Phobos team how to proceed with the PR.
Final stats:
Yes - 25
No - 0
Quite a definitive approval. http://wiki.dlang.org/Review_Queue
log has been updated.
With this formal review of std.experimental.allocator is
considered finished.
On Monday, 3 August 2015 at 09:21:50 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
The summary is you can now write this:
struct UdpPacket {
static struct Header {
ushort srcPort;
ushort dstPort;
ushort length;
ushort checksum;
}
enum header
On Monday, 3 August 2015 at 09:40:59 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
In this case, yes. In the real-life case I was simplifying, it
wasn't a ubyte[] array, it was an array of structs with
non-trivial serialisation that also depended on a previous
deserialised variable. It was more like this:
struct O
A bit more details -
https://blog.dicebot.lv/posts/2015/08/In_the_mood_for_some_releasing
Project repo - https://github.com/Dicebot/mood
Branch which powers actual blog.dicebot.lv -
https://github.com/Dicebot/mood/tree/blog.dicebot.lv
Copy of feature list for quick overview:
- stand-alone
On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 18:55:19 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 18:51:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
- HTTPS-only
By the way, Firefox on Mac does not recognize your TLS
certificate as valid.
– David
Yeah, I am aware of that issue, need to embed signature chains of
On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 19:01:47 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 18:55:19 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 18:51:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
- HTTPS-only
By the way, Firefox on Mac does not recognize your TLS
certificate as valid.
– David
Yeah
On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 20:50:16 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 08/14/2015 02:51 PM, Dicebot wrote:
A bit more details -
https://blog.dicebot.lv/posts/2015/08/In_the_mood_for_some_releasing
Nice.
One thing: can i haz rss/atom plz?
https://blog.dicebot.lv/posts.rss
https://github.com
On Saturday, 15 August 2015 at 08:28:59 UTC, wobbles wrote:
Nice work! Load times are excellent.
I've been meaning to do something like this for ages, never got
the time.
I'll just use this now. How open to pull requests / alterations
are you? I might try to do up a comment system for it.
Su
P.S. I have added license statement (Boost) for those who care.
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 20:00:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/17/2015 10:00 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Tried to submit this, someone already did:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3hbvrb/mood_simple_vibed_based_blog/
-- Andrei
Dicebot, please post something there
On Friday, 14 August 2015 at 20:50:16 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 08/14/2015 02:51 PM, Dicebot wrote:
A bit more details -
https://blog.dicebot.lv/posts/2015/08/In_the_mood_for_some_releasing
Nice.
One thing: can i haz rss/atom plz?
Actually I have just tested it and seems to work in
On Tuesday, 18 August 2015 at 15:26:23 UTC, David Gill wrote:
On Thursday, 2 July 2015 at 17:41:52 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
I've added this to the wiki
http://wiki.dlang.org/Jobs
@bachmeier could you remove our job offer from the wiki? We've
had a tremendous response, but the position has bee
Great!
Daniel, does that mean that I can remove DDMD testing job from my
CI? :)
Rough summary of the talk I have given for recent Berlin D meetup
event:
https://blog.dicebot.lv/posts/2015/08/OOP_composition_with_mixins
On Monday, 31 August 2015 at 14:44:27 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 11:10:16 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Rough summary of the talk I have given for recent Berlin D
meetup event:
https://blog.dicebot.lv/posts/2015/08/OOP_composition_with_mixins
It seems like mixin templates can be
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 10:18:08 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 11:10:16 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Rough summary of the talk I have given for recent Berlin D
meetup event:
https://blog.dicebot.lv/posts/2015/08/OOP_composition_with_mixins
I'm having trouble reso
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 13:44:15 UTC, cym13 wrote:
BTW, a bit HS but in your article about Rust
(https://blog.dicebot.lv/posts/2015/01/thoughts_about_rust_from_d_programmer) there is a “” lying in the first example.
Thanks, fixed.
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 14:11:44 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 11:10:16 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Rough summary of the talk I have given for recent Berlin D
meetup event:
https://blog.dicebot.lv/posts/2015/08/OOP_composition_with_mixins
Are you planning on submitting this
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 14:52:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 14:39:57 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
Why do you need long term backwards compatibility?
It would be nice for bootstrapping... now that we need dmd to
build dmd, it'd be really annoying if yo
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 09:07:24 UTC, Chris wrote:
Thanks, great stuff! One thing you say it's been tested with
2.067.1, but for this version it gives the following error
message:
containers/experimental_allocator/src/std/experimental/allocator/common.d(337):
Error: module meta is i
If only this was mentioned at least few weeks earlier I'd try to
attend :(
On Friday, 16 October 2015 at 10:04:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We're very excited about the creation of the D Language
Foundation and we hold high hopes that it will have a strong
positive effect on the D language and community.
Andrei
Looking forward to reading more details about i
On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 21:01:06 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 20:29:41 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
From the README: "The D Completion Daemon is an auto-complete
program for the D programming language." 0.7.1 is a (boring)
bug-fix release.
https://github.com/Hacker
On Tuesday, 20 October 2015 at 22:14:24 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 October 2015 at 08:28:19 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Which LDC is it supposed to build with? Trying latest stable
(0.15.1) I get:
src/server/autocomplete.d(23): Error: module logger is in file
'std/experimental/log
On Sunday, 1 November 2015 at 19:28:48 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Many thanks to both you and ponce! This is great work.
I have good news and bad news. The bad news is we won't likely
be able to accept either of these proposals.
The good news is Sociomantic wants to get behind the DConf
logo de
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 09:30:30 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Reply to this with 1.1, 1.2, 2, or 3:
1) by ponce:
Variant 1:
https://github.com/p0nce/dconf.org/blob/master/2016/images/logo-sample.png
Variant 2:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/p0nce/dconf.org/4f0f2b5be8ec2b06e3feb
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 at 01:50:38 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.069.0.
http://dlang.org/download.html
http://downloads.dlang.org/releases/2.x/2.069.0/
This is the first release with a self-hosted dmd compiler and
comes with even more rangified phobos functions,
std.e
On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 14:14:23 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
With a codebase like phobos, compiling in several steps isn't a
bad solution. But I am building a parser using pegged, and
splitting up the grammar into different modules feels like a
no-no. It's an option though.
Note that y
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 10:39:21 UTC, Thomas Brix Larsen
wrote:
Opt-in stats from Arch:
https://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics
go 19.45%
rust5.92%
gcc-go 5.61%
dmd 2.56%
ldc 1.72%
gdc 1.60%
This matches my personal understanding of current "market" share
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 12:58:39 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 12:28:09 UTC, FreeSlave wrote:
I tried to install rpm-package on Fedora 20 with rpm -i, but
it gives me
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc-devel(x86-32) is needed by dmd-2.069.0-0.x86_64
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 21:38:13 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 11/09/2015 07:08 PM, Dicebot wrote:
More common practice is to declare such dependencies as
optional though.
I made a ticket https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15308.
Simply changing
https://github.com/D-Programming
On Wednesday, 11 November 2015 at 17:30:07 UTC, Lionello Lunesu
wrote:
* Can I create an array of shared ints (as opposed to a shared
array of ints)? I said that one could by using shared(int)[],
although I have yet to try this myself.
Should totally work. Imagine thread-local slices from bunc
And how about GPG signing of releases which comes free and
actually helps? :P
On Monday, 23 November 2015 at 08:33:10 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Monday, 23 November 2015 at 04:37:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
And how about GPG signing of releases which comes free and
actually helps? :P
When you hover over any of the download links on
http://dlang.org/download.html, a
On Saturday, 28 November 2015 at 04:27:51 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Monday, 23 November 2015 at 12:35:35 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Whoa, this must be pretty new. Though subkey used seems to be
almost 1 year old now.
sub rsa4096/12BB1939 2015-02-27
Why should I renew the subkey w/o cause?
Then
On Friday, 11 December 2015 at 18:50:29 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Monday, 7 December 2015 at 17:39:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Looking forward to seeing you at DConf!
Just found out I won't be able to come, so will the entire
thing be live streamed?
It is on the list but definitiv
`auto p = () @trusted { return &t; } ();`
Huh, I thought Andrei was opposed to this idiom? Is it now
considered reserved for templates or something has changed?
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 04:31:25 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
That was for non-templated functions where this approach makes
no sense. Indeed it is counterproductive, because @trusted on
the whole function is a better indication of what needs to be
reviewed for memory safety (the whole funct
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 13:42:13 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 13:39:48 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I'd suggest at the very least to add a comment before
"p.bar();" saying "Must not escape 'p' pointer or @safe-ty
will be compromised"
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:49:36 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
What needs to be standardized? Data structure architecture.
Already in Phobos. Cross platform Input/Output. Already in
Phobos.
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 16:49:36 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Why isn't Dub the way forward on this
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 21:08:54 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.070.0
http://dlang.org/download.html
This release comes with the new std.experimental.ndslice,
heavily expanded Windows bindings, and native exception
handling on 64-bit linux. See the changelog for more d
On 02/03/2016 07:05 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Something that's been on my mind for a few months, finally got around to
> a little write-up about it.
>
> We're Overlooking A Key Part of C/C++ to D User Migration:
>
> https://semitwist.com/articles/article/view/we-re-overlooking-a-key-part-of-c-
On 02/09/2016 09:16 PM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> This release brings some larger changes:
>
> ...
Changelog looks very exciting, good work!
On 02/12/2016 12:35 AM, extrawurst wrote:
> I will try to come, I just need to find a place to stay there.
>
> --Stephan
Looking forward to seeing you there!
401 - 500 of 592 matches
Mail list logo
