On 8/09/2015 1:54 AM, "Luís Marques wrote:
On Friday, 4 September 2015 at 12:38:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
It's not that phobos is bad, it's that we're following the same
development pattern we had with C++. We're using a conservative
subset of D features and libraries, and slowly expanding
On Friday, 4 September 2015 at 12:38:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
It's not that phobos is bad, it's that we're following the same
development pattern we had with C++. We're using a
conservative subset of D features and libraries, and slowly
expanding what's acceptable. For example, DMD now use
On Sunday, 6 September 2015 at 04:20:36 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
On 6/09/2015 2:47 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
wrote:
But you are going to do high level refactoring too, right? Not
just
local conversions into foreachs and the like?
Of course. Some of this was been started b
On 6/09/2015 5:11 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm pretty sure the conversion tool already converted at least some
loops to foreach loops.
I took that code out some time before the switch because D's stricter
implicit conversions were causing problems in some places. Even doing
it by hand is
On 6/09/2015 2:47 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
wrote:
But you are going to do high level refactoring too, right? Not just
local conversions into foreachs and the like?
Of course. Some of this was been started before the conversion.
On 2015-09-05 18:47, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
wrote:
But you are going to do high level refactoring too, right? Not just
local conversions into foreachs and the like?
I'm pretty sure the conversion tool already converted at least some
loops to foreach loops.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Friday, 4 September 2015 at 12:38:41 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
expanding what's acceptable. For example, DMD now uses foreach
and delegates in a few places, and I expect we'll see a lot of
use of D strings in the near future.
But you are going to do high level refactoring too, right? Not
j
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5
years to make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for
helping
On 1/09/2015 11:57 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Surely this is a code coverage issue then?
Are there any unit tests in ddmd?
There is an enormous test suite, but there are also plenty of parts with
zero coverage.
On 2/09/2015 11:23 PM, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Surely if the dog food is so bad no one should be eating?
It's not that phobos is bad, it's that we're following the same
development pattern we had with C++. We're using a conservative subset
of D features and libraries,
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 15:48:42 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
Exactly. I was surprised to find out I couldn't use Phobos in
ddmd. Raw D is still more pleasant than programming in C++, but
not nearly as much fun as writing normal D code.
Wait can the GC be used in ddmd?
On 02-Sep-2015 16:23, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Dmitry Olshansky via
Digitalmars-d-announce mailto:digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com>> wrote:
Because the compiler and library releases go in lockstep we'd have
to wait for another r
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 13:23:50 UTC, Rory McGuire
wrote:
Surely the compiler should always rely on the previous compiler
+ standard library versions.
Is there really a valid reason not to do this? Surely if the
dog food is so bad no one should be eating?
I am hoping that DMD will
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Dmitry Olshansky via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
> Because the compiler and library releases go in lockstep we'd have to wait
> for another release cycle to even field-test @nogc. Not acceptable really.
>
> Phobos ends up battle testing every new feature and i
On 02-Sep-2015 07:52, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 2 Sep 2015 5:31 am, "Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce"
mailto:digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com>> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 09:44:17 Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > O
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 at 03:31:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 09:44:17 Steven Schveighoffer
via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 9/1/15 6:48 AM, "Luís Marques wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright
> wrote:
>> We have made t
On 2 Sep 2015 5:31 am, "Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 09:44:17 Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > On 9/1/15 6:48 AM, "Luís Marques wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:
On Tuesday, September 01, 2015 09:44:17 Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On 9/1/15 6:48 AM, "Luís Marques wrote:
> > On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> >> We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
> >
> > Is there a rough prediction of
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 15:02:37 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Seems to me that the most important advantage of moving to D is
to attract developers that are unfamiliar with C++, so using
selected parts of Phobos would make it a lot easier and fun for
them to contribute.
I assume re
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 14:52:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 14:39:57 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
Why do you need long term backwards compatibility?
It would be nice for bootstrapping... now that we need dmd to
build dmd, it'd be really annoying if yo
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 14:39:57 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Why do you need long term backwards compatibility?
It would be nice for bootstrapping... now that we need dmd to
build dmd, it'd be really annoying if you need to install version
X-3 to compile version X-2 to compile X-1
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 14:52:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 14:39:57 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
Why do you need long term backwards compatibility?
It would be nice for bootstrapping... now that we need dmd to
build dmd, it'd be really annoying if yo
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 at 14:33:47 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
deprecating, and removing. We need long term backwards
compatibility, and Phobos just doesn't fit in that picture
(yet).
Why do you need long term backwards compatibility?
On 1 September 2015 at 15:57, Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>> I'm not a dmd dev, but I'm not sure it will be accepted, since phobos is
>
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> [snip]
> I'm not a dmd dev, but I'm not sure it will be accepted, since phobos is
> very unstable. We have to be cautious about making dmd breakable easily by
> a change to phobos.
> [snip]
-Steve
>
Surely
On 9/1/15 6:48 AM, "Luís Marques wrote:
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Is there a rough prediction of when the use of phobos in ddmd will start
to be accepted?
I'm not a dmd dev, but I'm not sure it will be acc
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Is there a rough prediction of when the use of phobos in ddmd
will start to be accepted?
On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 18:44:48 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
No, this is a tool for generating C/C++ header files from D
modules, DStep does the opposite.
I did one to the point where it basically worked for the support
dmd had for C++ interop a couple years ago, but since that's
changed
On 2015-08-29 18:39, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
I guess he means dstep...
No, this is a tool for generating C/C++ header files from D modules,
DStep does the opposite.
BTW, I'm the author of DStep ;)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Saturday, 29 August 2015 at 16:07:37 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:mrsigg$1574$1...@digitalmars.com...
I'm pretty sure we already have a tool that generates C/C++
headers for D modules.
Adam started one, I don't think it got to the point where it
would
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message news:mrsigg$1574$1...@digitalmars.com...
I'm pretty sure we already have a tool that generates C/C++ headers for D
modules.
Adam started one, I don't think it got to the point where it would work for
this, and I don't agree that the json output is a good way
On 2015-08-29 12:44, Daniel Murphy wrote:
I'm just planning to implement this in dmd and have it dump out all
extern(C++) declarations. (and structs and constants)
I'm pretty sure we already have a tool that generates C/C++ headers for
D modules.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
"Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce"
wrote in message
news:mailman.647.1440844869.13986.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Just an idea to selectively @tag any classes or functions you want to
export to C++, then let the
conversion tool do the rest. This is as opposed to going back
On 29 August 2015 at 12:25, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> "Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
> digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote in message
> news:mailman.640.1440835567.13986.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
>
>
"Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce"
wrote in message
news:mailman.640.1440835567.13986.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
> I'm planning to generate the C++ headers from the D source rather than
> maintain them by hand.
You could use UDAs for that!
How?
On 29 Aug 2015 5:50 am, "Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> ""Luís Marques " wrote in message
news:ckyiqzpchfahzfjmm...@forum.dlang.org...
>
>
>> What is the relation between the .h files that were left intact, and the
backend, GDC, and LDC?
""Luís Marques " wrote in message
news:fnhnundiapulkyqmi...@forum.dlang.org...
Probably not all of them, though, no? For instance, utf.h is not needed by
the GDC / LDC glue code, is it?
We don't have a policy on this yet. It won't matter so much if we can
auto-generate the headers.
On Saturday, 29 August 2015 at 03:47:46 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
The frontend header files will need to stay intact, and GDC/LDC
will continue to use them. All the backend header files can be
deleted once the backend has been converted.
Probably not all of them, though, no? For instance, utf
""Luís Marques " wrote in message
news:ckyiqzpchfahzfjmm...@forum.dlang.org...
What is the relation between the .h files that were left intact, and the
backend, GDC, and LDC? When the backend is converted to D, will the DMD
source drop the C++ header files, or will (some?) of those be left beh
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
What is the relation between the .h files that were left intact,
and the backend, GDC, and LDC? When the backend is converted to
D, will the DMD source drop the C++ header files, or
On 8/28/2015 8:59 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Hummm… I was programming FORTRAN in 1969 – punch cards, the whole hours
turnaround per run deal, which I would never like to recreate. Maybe I
shall have to reconcile myself to having dissipated all my talent so as to
become ta
On 8/28/2015 5:44 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
At what age does one become a telentless oldie?
I plan to continue until my mind no longer works.
On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 14:59 +0200, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
> > […]
> I'd have a tentative guess and say when you're Bio begins with "Past my
> sell-by date."
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/users/1444574/steve-teale
Hummm… I was programming FORTRAN in 1969 – punch cards, the
On Friday, 28 August 2015 at 13:27:42 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 28 August 2015 at 07:47:13 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Current GDC master can compile DDMD, although it uses the
2.066.1 frontend. Iain backported the relevant C++ mangle
changes:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Langu
On Friday, 28 August 2015 at 07:47:13 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Current GDC master can compile DDMD, although it uses the
2.066.1 frontend. Iain backported the relevant C++ mangle
changes:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4957
The first LDC 2.067.1 beta is imminent.
— Dav
On 28 August 2015 at 14:44, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 21:07 +, Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-announce
> wrote:
> >
> […]
> > I am very impressed by the young talent in the D community. I
> > asked one such
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 21:07 +, Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
>
[…]
> I am very impressed by the young talent in the D community. I
> asked one such chap how he knew so much, and he attributed it to
> learning from being around such top notch guys as you, Andrei,
> and the
"Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce"
wrote in message
news:mailman.598.1440753894.13986.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
Best to start using GDC in the CI development of DMD now though so we
catch them when it
happens!
I've played the 'upgrade the autotester' game before, and I'
On 28 August 2015 at 11:15, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> "Johannes Pfau" wrote in message news:mrp3m1$184s$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Current GDC master can compile DDMD, although it uses the 2.066.1
>> frontend. Iain backported the re
"Johannes Pfau" wrote in message news:mrp3m1$184s$1...@digitalmars.com...
Current GDC master can compile DDMD, although it uses the 2.066.1
frontend. Iain backported the relevant C++ mangle changes:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4957
Yeah, I guess the more accurate state
Am Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:21:52 +1000
schrieb "Daniel Murphy" :
> "Bruno Medeiros" wrote in message
> news:mrn30f$26ff$2...@digitalmars.com...
>
> > Cool stuff!
>
> Yeah!
>
> > What's the plan going forward, for those not so much up to date
> > with what's going on? Is the next major release of D
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5
years to make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for
helping
"Bruno Medeiros" wrote in message news:mrn30f$26ff$2...@digitalmars.com...
Cool stuff!
Yeah!
What's the plan going forward, for those not so much up to date with
what's going on? Is the next major release of DMD gonna be D-DMD based
then? Which compiler is going to be used to compile D-DMD
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5
years to make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for
helping
On 23/08/2015 06:17, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5 years to
make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for helping shepherd it
through the
On 23/08/2015 06:17, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5 years to
make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for helping shepherd it
through the
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5
years to make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for
helping
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Worth mentioning:
The final call to dmd that compiles 117 klines (~80 files) of D
code in one show and links dmd takes 1.1 s
Good news indeed! Well done everybody!
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5
years to make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for
helping
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Wow! I'll spread the Word!
On 23-Aug-2015 08:17, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5 years to
make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for helping shepherd it
through th
Am 23.08.2015 um 07:17 schrieb Walter Bright:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5 years to
make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for helping shepherd it
through
On 08/23/2015 01:08 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 08/23/2015 06:35 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I haven't worked with the conversion tool before. How is this part done?
It's the exact command below that line, we've incorporated that into the
makefile.
Ah, ok, I misunderstood that part.
On 08/23/2015 07:08 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 08/23/2015 06:35 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>
>> I haven't worked with the conversion tool before. How is this part done?
>
> It's the exact command below that line, we've incorporated that into the
> makefile.
>
In case it doesn't work b/c you a
On 08/23/2015 06:35 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
> I haven't worked with the conversion tool before. How is this part done?
It's the exact command below that line, we've incorporated that into the
makefile.
On 08/23/2015 01:37 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 08/23/2015 07:22 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
Now lets hope the next stage is smooth in the transition.
Here is a small guide on how to update a PR.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4922#issuecomment-133776696
"# convert all co
Awesome job Daniel!
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Congratulations.
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 09:44:55 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/23/2015 2:36 AM, BBasile wrote:
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 08:56:14 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"BBasile" wrote in message
news:fmoabuqgvlztgmqyj...@forum.dlang.org...
[...]
The missing step is to set HOST_DC in the envi
"Mike" wrote in message news:hkyvytmqbstkelkum...@forum.dlang.org...
There are still a number of .h files in the front end. What will happen
with those? Do they need to be maintained?
For now they must be maintained by hand, if there is any possibility of the
glue layers or backends needin
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Very Cool! And thank you to all who worked towards it.
There are still a number of .h files in the front end. What will
happen with those? Do they need to be maintained?
"Dicebot" wrote in message news:jdgpeyxvdltshldnf...@forum.dlang.org...
Great!
Daniel, does that mean that I can remove DDMD testing job from my
CI? :)
Yes, thanks!
On 08/23/2015 11:09 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> Great!
>
> Daniel, does that mean that I can remove DDMD testing job from my CI? :)
I think so.
On 08/23/2015 08:48 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> It should do with whatever is in master at least. But until I'm able to
> release new binaries, there is at least new TravisCI integration testing of
> PRs that test building ddmd with ldc and gdc.
But it currently fails.
htt
On 8/23/2015 2:36 AM, BBasile wrote:
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 08:56:14 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"BBasile" wrote in message news:fmoabuqgvlztgmqyj...@forum.dlang.org...
By the way, currently under win32 it's not possible to build DDMD unless the
line
---
#HOST_DC=dmd
---
is uncommented.
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 08:56:14 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"BBasile" wrote in message
news:fmoabuqgvlztgmqyj...@forum.dlang.org...
By the way, currently under win32 it's not possible to build
DDMD unless the line
---
#HOST_DC=dmd
---
is uncommented. Because there is a bunch of command
Great!
Daniel, does that mean that I can remove DDMD testing job from my
CI? :)
"Joakim" wrote in message news:sfhycfhmabpfxxuxn...@forum.dlang.org...
Great work, thanks to Daniel and others who helped out, can't wait to use
ddmd and see all the changes that come with it in the next couple
releases.
I can't wait to use foreach internally! No more manual for loops!
Can
"BBasile" wrote in message news:fmoabuqgvlztgmqyj...@forum.dlang.org...
By the way, currently under win32 it's not possible to build DDMD unless
the line
---
#HOST_DC=dmd
---
is uncommented. Because there is a bunch of commands using dmd compile and
run (-run) in win32.mak. Is it a bug ? Ma
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5
years to make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for
helping
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Congratulations!! :)
On 8/23/2015 12:48 AM, Joakim wrote:
Can we look forward to a complete ddmd, ie backend and everything ported to D
too, anytime soon?
Once this all settles down and we're comfortable with it, I'd like to port the
rest of dmd to D. No schedule for now.
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5
years to make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for
helping
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 06:08:54 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"BBasile" wrote in message
news:rljvemqjfvnnqqnnc...@forum.dlang.org...
Excellent. I guess it's also time to clean the wiki page that
explained how to build under win32 with DMC. It's obsolete now.
Nope! The glue layer and bac
On 23 August 2015 at 07:42, rsw0x via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
>>
>> We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
>>
>> Many
"BBasile" wrote in message news:rljvemqjfvnnqqnnc...@forum.dlang.org...
Excellent. I guess it's also time to clean the wiki page that explained
how to build under win32 with DMC. It's obsolete now.
Nope! The glue layer and backend are still in C++, and still need to be
built with DMC.
On 08/23/2015 01:17 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
http://semitwist.com/download/av/you-did-it.mp4
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5
years to make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for
helping
On Sunday, 23 August 2015 at 05:17:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
[...]
Excellent. I guess it's also time to clean the wiki page that
explained how to build under win32 with DMC. It's obsolete
On 08/23/2015 07:22 AM, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
> Now lets hope the next stage is smooth in the transition.
Here is a small guide on how to update a PR.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4922#issuecomment-133776696
On 8/23/2015 5:17 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5 years to
make this happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for helping shepherd it
through th
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4923
We have made the switch from C++ DMD to D DMD!
Many, many thanks to Daniel Murphy for slaving away for 2.5 years to make this
happen. More thanks to Martin Nowak for helping shepherd it through the final
stages, and to several others who
93 matches
Mail list logo