Hi,
ID should be uniqe over the page, so div#myid is redundant.
No, it isn't. It should return an empty jQuery-Object in case the Element with
the id myid is not a div. That is usefull when you produce your Content
dynamically (e.g. with PHP). The same is true for .myclass#myid, or even
Thanks Blair, this was helpful.
My major fault, it seems, was the .val, not .html issue. The
elements were inserted correctly.
I still cannot get $(#nLinkForm).reset(); to work, but by looping
through the form elements and setting their value to an empty string
or value to false:
for
Ok i'm a newbie in jquery and i'm trying to write function that will replace
all span class=y!-- --/span element's content with current year.
My function looks like this:
$(function(){
$(.y).ready(function() {
var today = new Date();
var year = today.getFullYear();
document.write(year);
});
Hi
$(function(){
$(.y).ready(function() {
var today = new Date();
var year = today.getFullYear();
document.write(year);
});
});
$(function() {
$('.y').html((new Date()).getFullYear());
});
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
Try this (untested):
$(function() {
$('.y').html( (new Date).getFullYear() );
});
-Mike
p.s. Could we avoid profanity on the mailing list? Thanks.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kristaps Ancans
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 12:44 AM
To:
Excellent, Dave. Your explanation is much appreciated. I'd tried something
similar in my 'period of frustration', but didn't know about the []'s
denoting descendents.
dave.methvin wrote:
What I'm trying to achieve is the element with id=save-search only
gets hidden if it does not contain
I've recently moved from prototype to jquery, and wonder if there's
something simmilar to Position.clone. That is, match an arbitrary
elements position exactly, (with all the offsets and parents and so
on, it's more to it than just match top and left attributes)
I googled a bit and came up
For anyone searching for similar answers, I've since learnt that this works
too:
$(#testDiv:not([input:checked])).hide();
The explanation (courtesy of Dave Methvin):
#testDiv// select an element with id=testDiv
:not( // as long as the following is not found:
Hi Andreas,
yes there is something quite similar, if not even better working thing: It's
the additional function offset() in the dimensions.js plugin, which you can
get via SVN in the plugins directory.
Just pick the element you want and do $(myelement).offset(), and you'll get
a nice object
Hi folks,
I am trying to use the InnerFade plugin on a site I am developing
using Drupal. In it, I have a block that lists up to the last 5
stories posted. Due to the way Views work in Drupal, I am not able to
add a class to the UL element directly, the code looks like below:
div
Bahh, ignore this email!
It was my own typo, the selector should have been div.item-listul,
not div.itemlistul as I had.
Now it's working :)
Tane
On 12/19/06, digital spaghetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I am trying to use the InnerFade plugin on a site I am developing
using
You probably shouldn't use document.write() for anything; Dynamic HTML
and the DOM have pretty much
made is obsolete.
document.write() will replace the whole document if you run it at any
time except when the document is being loaded.
So you can use it inline:
span class=yscript
var
Hi,
I'm binding an event with oneclick and it's working just fine in firefox,
but the contents of the code actually fires itself in IE like an .each
instead of binding it to the click event.
Here's the context: I've got a page that will list an address, with a little
add/remove button. When
Sweet! Thank you, works completely as advertised (once I remember to
show the element I actually want to look at hehe)
Andreas
On Dec 19, 2006, at 11:30 , Paul Bakaus wrote:
Hi Andreas,
yes there is something quite similar, if not even better working
thing: It's the additional function
Alex Brem wrote:
So.. am I moving it into the right direction? :)
Certainly! You're laying the framework for a lot of things here -- I can
see live spelling checks with suggested words on right click, WYSIWYG|M
developer friendly API, pruning/filtering of textarea data so on.
Keep it up
#save-search// select an element with id=save-search
:not( // as long as the following is not found:
[ // descendent elements containing
div // a div
.error-message// with class
looking for an ID (which should be unique) after getting the tags is
worthless.
Should we re-write the case of tag#id to use elem.getElementBYId(),
and then remove the element if it's not the right tag?
- Brian
___
jQuery mailing list
Kristaps,
Try something like,
$(document).ready(function(){
var year = newDate().getFullYear();
$(.y).empty().append(year);
});
Cheers,
Chris
Kristaps Ancāns wrote:
Ok i'm a newbie in jquery and i'm trying to write function that will
replace all span class=y!-- --/span element's
Dave,
I love the analogy! :o)
My situation is more like:
$(#Oven).find(.ChristmasPies).remove().appendTo(#CoolingRack); :o)
Only, I didn't know that I had to use .find(). What I've *really* got is two
unorderd lists, and I'm trying to move selected items from one list to the
other. So, if I
2006/12/19, Christof Donat [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
ID should be uniqe over the page, so div#myid is redundant.
No, it isn't. It should return an empty jQuery-Object in case the Element
with
the id myid is not a div. That is usefull when you produce your Content
dynamically (e.g. with PHP).
Dave, That worked brilliantly! Thanks so much!
Cheers,
Chris
Dave Methvin wrote:
I have the need of removing list items from List A and
then adding them to List B. I'm using the .remove()
function to remove the elements from the DOM. The API
says very urgently that the remove() method doesn't
If you want to keep performance, maybe it's better to do:
if( $(#myid).is('div.myclass')) alert(YEAH, WE GOT IT);
else alert(Ha, my ID is misused!!);
Wow. When I started writing this reply, I thought of using tagName and
className,
but is() is so much more elegant.
Christof Donat wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
ID should be uniqe over the page, so div#myid is redundant.
[...]
I know that. My point is that there should not be two elements with same id
on the page. At least, I'm developing like that.
But that doesn't make the expression div#myid redundant. Of course the id
should be unique,
On Dec 19, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Aaron Heimlich wrote:
If you want some more detail (and have Firefox with Firebug 1.0
Beta installed), you can head on over to http://
aheimlich.freepgs.com/tests/jquery/speed-test-firebug/ where I
replicated Karl's tests using Firebug 1.0 Beta's script profiling
Hi,
I think what Christof is getting at is this: [...]
Yes, exactly.
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hi,
If you want to keep performance, maybe it's better to do:
if( $(#myid).is('div.myclass')) alert(YEAH, WE GOT IT);
else alert(Ha, my ID is misused!!);
Yes, of course. If I whant to use jQuery methods I could also use filter():
$('#myid').filter('div.myclass').addClass('hereWeGo');
But I
OK, here is an interesting tidbit.
I used the test below and and did the 7 click thing, and out of all my
tests except one, the long delay happened in has() and once I got it in
find(). has() is pretty simple and I wonder if this has less to do with
the number of clicks versus the number of
Hi all,
With the tests I ran (http://fmarcia.info/jquery/speedtest.html [1]),
the quickest way to retrieve one element is
$(document.getElementById(id)), even better than $('#id')!
Off course, to get even better performance, one should cache queries
every time it's possible!
My 2 cents,
Dragan, I think what Christof is getting at is this: on any given page,
#myid could be uniquely assigned to a div or a paragraph or a span or an
image or any other element. So, page 1 could have div id=myid/div and
page 2 could have p id=myid/p
If the same script is being included on multiple
When writing plugin, when is best to write simply methods, as opposed to an
object with helper functions?
Not sure when to use jQuery.foo versus jQuery.fn.foo
Thanks.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
I've been curious about this myself for jquery in
general... I love OO programming and tend to
always try to use it (including sticking with PHP
objects, etc) unless terribly unnecessary; is there a
compelling reason to NOT use objects whenever possible
in jquery, since objects provide such
btw, I just added a text input so you can run whatever query you want
on the page. just type in the selector -- without $() -- and press
the Test! button.
In case anyone wants to try but has lost the thread, here is the URL
again:
http://test.learningjquery.com/speed-test.htm
On Dec 19,
In the vein of the discussion we've been having on this list (and, of
course, heavily inspired by the first speed test), I've created a more
extensive speed test that tests a bunch of similar cases.
A word of warning: your browser will not be available for a good 30 seconds
or so while the test
Not sure when to use jQuery.foo versus jQuery.fn.foo
jQuery.foo just creates a function on the jQuery object (technically,
on the constructor function). jQuery.fn.foo creates a function on the
prototype object of the jQuery object. If you want your function to
be available to all jQuery object
When writing plugins, in general, when should I use jquery functions over
standard javascript? (Sorry that question expose my ignorance.)
I wondering when I should use a this.each in favor of a standard loop
statement, or when to use getElementById instead of the dollar function?
My worry
I'm happy to announce the jQuery project has received some great press
via Ajaxian.
http://ajaxian.com/archives/jquery-updates-104-documentation-and-people
Its awesome to see jQuery getting some great exposure on this top-notch
Ajax news site.
Rey
The first thing my code does is test how long it takes to run a
$(.class) query, and bases the number of attempts for each
test on the speed of that query (not a perfect system, but it
should prevent crazy long loads on slow computers.
Check the test out at:
Hi,
Just wondering whether it's possible to get the $.getJSON -generated
object into local scope? Something along the lines of this:
$(document).ready(function(){
createObject();
appendObject();
});
function createObject(){
$.getJSON('animal.js',function(json){
My results:
$('body') 1.33ms 0.64ms 0.62ms
$('body div') 34.38ms 34.38ms 34.06ms
$('div', [jQuery('div'), jQuery('a')]) 69.06ms 68.12ms 67.82ms
document.body.getElementsByTagName('div') 0ms 0ms 0ms
$(jQuery.merge(document.getElementsByTagName('div'), [])) 23.12ms
Tim Saker schrieb:
I've actually completed a solution to these problems prior to this post. The
solution involves updates to both the modalContent plugin and it's
dependency, dimensions.js. I just need to finish polishing the changes to
conform to the plugin guidelines.
Just release 'em
On Dec 19, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Dave Methvin wrote:
The first thing my code does is test how long it takes to run a
$(.class) query, and bases the number of attempts for each
test on the speed of that query (not a perfect system, but it
should prevent crazy long loads on slow computers.
Check
As I've mentioned here before, I'm working on a drag-and-drop file manager
right now. In Firefox, I'm getting a lot of class=undefined (or
class=droppable selectable name undefined) nodes in the DOM source after a
few drag and drop operations. (They should be droppable selectable name,
plus a
snagt schrieb:
Hello there!
Just getting to know the wonderful world of Jquery and all the things
written for it. I'm building my new website with my illustration portfolio
and am able to implement and modify all the scripts I need, but now I've
stumbled upon a problem I can't solve myself..
Is it possible to get the current cursor offset in a text field?
For example Hello world if the cursor is between the H and e could I
somehow get the offset of 1?
-js
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I've narrowed it down more. Every droppable node has class=droppable
selectable name undefined on load. Once it has had the hover class applied,
whether or not the draggable is actually dropped, its class switches to
either just undefined or empty.
--
View this message in context:
Hi Jonathan,
Is this what you're looking for? Posted a few days ago...
http://laboratorium.0xab.cd/jquery/fieldselection/
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Dec 19, 2006, at 1:28 PM, Jonathan Sharp wrote:
Is it possible to get the
fellows,
Finally my first JQuery driven site has been released -
http://www.findfreefonts.net . To start by presenting myself - I try to
spread the word about JQuery in the ASP.NET world - through my site
Man, I just can't keep up with this list!
Yeah, that's 90% of what I'm looking for, I need the ability for a
setSelection which would just focus set the cursor/selection position in
the field... I found some examples of this. Would you be interested in
adding this to your plugin?
Cheers,
Stephen Woodbridge schrieb:
OK, here is an interesting tidbit.
I used the test below and and did the 7 click thing, and out of all my
tests except one, the long delay happened in has() and once I got it in
find(). has() is pretty simple and I wonder if this has less to do with
the number
Looks good.
When I click on the tag cloud on the left hand side I get this error:
Server Error in '/' Application.
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current
custom error
Jani Tarvainen schrieb:
Hi,
Just wondering whether it's possible to get the $.getJSON -generated
object into local scope? Something along the lines of this:
$(document).ready(function(){
createObject();
appendObject();
});
function createObject(){
Jonathan Sharp schrieb:
Man, I just can't keep up with this list!
Yeah, that's 90% of what I'm looking for, I need the ability for a
setSelection which would just focus set the cursor/selection
position in the field... I found some examples of this. Would you be
interested in adding this
In general, I'd say go with jQuery.fn.foo, that's when you get the
$(element).lots().of().nice().functionality();
jQuery.foo creates global functions, like
$.getJSON() and the like, not usually what you want.
Andreas
On Dec 19, 2006, at 18:11, Mike Alsup wrote:
Not sure when to use jQuery.foo
One thing I've wondered quite a bit about, if one should pass in
jquery objects to functions (generally internal ones in plugins) or
dom pointers. Is there a standard here, or is it on a per usage basis
what seems to be best at the moment?
Andreas
Not bad Stefan...
The site works fine, but you have some UI issues that you might want to deal
with.
For example, the search form takes up fully half of the vertical width of
the screen. I have to scroll to see ANY of the fonts that come back in my
search. May I suggest putting the search inside
Oh, yeah I've been looking at code too long today. Sorry Alex, didn't mean
to imply that Karl wrote it. My ALU was a little lagging...
-js
On 12/19/06, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 2:06 PM, Jonathan Sharp wrote:
Would you be interested in adding this to your
Oh man, of course it doesn't happen for me, neither with FF or IE. Will look
into the log.
Thanks for your time!
On 12/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good.
When I click on the tag cloud on the left hand side I get this error:
Server Error in '/' Application.
Stefan Holmberg schrieb:
Am using the cssRadio/cssCheckbox plugin, cookie plugin, hovertip etc. I
know it doesn't look all right in Firefox etc, but hey, I need something to
do waiting for Santa... Just wanted to thank you - and if you look at the
site and find some abvious errors/stupid
As I just said in another post on this thread, since the first beta I have
fixed a lot of bugs in Firebug
that broke some websites. It would be really helpful if you could test with
the
latest beta, and if it still breaks your site, send me a URL I can test
with. Other
beta users have done this
Very nice.
I tried (check all) and Sort by Most Downloaded then Search and got
Bad Request (Invalid URL) FF2 on WinNT
I like the nice style and use of effects.
-Steve
Stefan Holmberg wrote:
fellows,
Finally my first JQuery driven site has been released -
http://www.findfreefonts.net .
Currently I use PHP's built in session functions to
handle ensuring users are logged in, etc. It doesn't
work correctly a small percentage of the time, but is
robust as far as being able to use the $_SESSION array
and other such things. Now that I'm starting to use a
bunch of jquery stuff, I'm
Kim Johnson wrote:
Currently I use PHP's built in session functions to
handle ensuring users are logged in, etc. It doesn't
work correctly a small percentage of the time, but is
robust as far as being able to use the $_SESSION array
and other such things. Now that I'm starting to use a
bunch
Oh man, that is totally awesome. Just the kind of thing I was hoping people
would do with Firebug. The jQuery community rocks! :)
- Joe
If you want some more detail (and have Firefox with Firebug 1.0 Beta
installed), you can head on over to
Great work Stefan. Some feedback:
- Add a title to your pages. It currently reads Untitled Page
- Add the ability to remove a saved font from within the My Saved
Fonts page
- Modify the top right nav so that each option is clearly delineated.
Also, what did you use to show the popup of each
Thanks for stopping by Joe. Firebug rocks man and we're VERY
appreciative of your efforts. Thanks for making this amazing tool for us
developers.
Rey
joehewitt wrote:
Oh man, that is totally awesome. Just the kind of thing I was hoping people
would do with Firebug. The jQuery community
Stefan,
if you wish to keep the same html for the checkbox area, and give it some
layout, just a tiny bit of css, will sort out your checkboxes
..(just one way of doing it)
div.action nobr {float:left;width:120px}
div.action br {clear:left;}
On 12/19/06, joehewitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh man, that is totally awesome. Just the kind of thing I was hoping
people
would do with Firebug. The jQuery community rocks! :)
- Joe
Thanks Joe! I know you've probably been hearing this alot lately, but
Firebug (particulary 1.0 beta)
I'd vote for letting PHP do the session management. That way all of that
load is on the server (which is made for handling it). Then you can, at any
time, reference a session with AJAX.
It's what I do on my cookbook site.
!//--
andy matthews
web developer
certified advanced
Kim Johnson schreef:
Currently I use PHP's built in session functions to
handle ensuring users are logged in, etc. It doesn't
work correctly a small percentage of the time, but is
robust as far as being able to use the $_SESSION array
and other such things. Now that I'm starting to use a
I'm sorry for cluttering up the list with a niche issue but I've found a
workaround for both parts of the problem: although the Interface
documentation lists the Droppable activeclass attribute as optional,
leaving it unset causes class corruption. I figure it's harmless to supply
one, even if
Hello there,
This may sound like a dumb question, but somehow I can't figure it out:
Let's say we have a basic xml file and a simple piece of code:
?xml version=1.0?
foo
titleThis was loaded from an external XML file./title
/foo
$.get(ajax-test.xml,function(xml){
alert(
Hi,
What is your jquery version and browser (version)?
Abdul
insq wrote:
Hello there,
This may sound like a dumb question, but somehow I can't figure it out:
Let's say we have a basic xml file and a simple piece of code:
?xml version=1.0?
foo
titleThis was loaded from an external XML
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Methvin
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Question about remove();
If you append to multiple targets (e.g., .stockings selects multiple
elements) , the original elements are cloned before being appended to
each
target so the original
Im not sure, but try this:
$.get(ajax-test.xml,function(xml){
alert( $(title,xml).html() );
});
Untested, blah blah blah.
On 12/19/06, insq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello there,
This may sound like a dumb question, but somehow I can't figure it out:
Let's say we have a basic xml file and
Good to see some changes being made to the jquery.com site. Links on
the top, oh my!
-ALEX
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
$(#sQuestion).resetInput(). Most plugins create new methods that you can
run on a jQuery selection.
I haven't actually had to reset an entire form before, but I would expect
that you would have to do $(#nLinkForm)[0].reset().
i.e.
$(#nLinkForm) // select the form
[0] // access the DOM element
When I pass a dom obj, it shows I want it as a dom obj... when I pass a jq
obj it shows I want a jq obj...
both are cool, it all depends on what you are going to do with it!
On 12/19/06, Andreas Wahlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I've wondered quite a bit about, if one should pass in
hello all, definately need to start this post off with the I'm a jquery
newbie statement.
I'm trying to put together a quick search function that alllows for keyboard
navigation.
Here is an example:
http://brilliantretail.com/cases/filter/qs.php Search Example (Try
searching for
Thanks to the design/web team, at last...I don't have to scroll down at
the bottom just to click the PLUGINS section everytime I visit the site...
Cheers,
cdelfino
Alex Cook wrote:
Good to see some changes being made to the jquery.com site. Links on
the top, oh my!
-ALEX
Two HTML elements cannot share the same ID. If you want to use the same
description of two elements, use class, and search with $('.CLASSNAME').
Wonder if we could have a sticky for this forum explaining that.
RoadRat wrote:
Well I really do not know whats wrong in my code. I have two
Nope, this is a mailing list. Theres no way to sticky something in a mailing
list ;)
On 12/19/06, bander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two HTML elements cannot share the same ID. If you want to use the same
description of two elements, use class, and search with
$('.CLASSNAME').
Wonder if we
Hello,
I'm writing a function in a global script that will apply focus to the first
visible enabled form field on a page. I'm using the following jQuery
expression to find the control:
$('#mainContent
:input:visible:not(:checkbox):not(:button):not(:submit):not(:image):not([EMAIL
Actually, that was just me. I'm made some minor tweaks to the design
to help tide us over until the new design is ready-to-go. Are there
any other critical aspects that need attention until the new official
one is ready?
--John
On 12/19/06, Clodelio Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to
If you auto-fill form fields using php session and want to convert it to
a cookie-based storage
then its a good choice because you will offload your server.
Kim Johnson wrote:
Currently I use PHP's built in session functions to
handle ensuring users are logged in, etc. It doesn't
work
This is probably a noob question. I am using jquery, with the form plugin to
submit information, and the xmlExec plugin to handle responses. As far as I
can tell, the form plugin works, and the xmlExec receives and deals with an
xml file. It all seems to work, but what gets displayed on my
Thanks to all three of you for the responses :)
To explain a bit more about the extent of how I use
the sessions, the majority of why I use them is to
restrict access to certain areas. I have varying
levels of permissions on each user account, and do the
usual check if they are logged in on each
you are missing a ' after the remlink class name, and I think you want to
change your select statements to this format:
$(#ShowLinks .taglink).click( function ()
RoadRat wrote:
Ok, lets forget the id question. The problem persist:
div id='ShowLinks'
-- One row:
div id='450'
a
Try this (completely untested):
$(#mainContent :input:enabled:visible:first)
.filter([textarea,select,[EMAIL PROTECTED]'text']])
.each(function() {
this.focus();
});
On 12/19/06, Todd Menier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing a function in a global
On 12/19/06, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any other critical aspects that need attention until the new
official
one is ready?
The header looks really screwed up in IE. Everything seems to have been
pushed down real far and the top is cut of a bit.
--
Aaron Heimlich
Web
It's supposed to be that way! if you slip that lt; stuff into your page it
should appear as !
Since the xml is correct xml and you are concerned about things like the
carriage returns, you have properly encoded them.
Since there is no DTD or schema for the xml you can also write it all
without
Hi youngwax,
Like Blair said, you don't need the CDATA if you're sending back valid
XHTML. That said, br is not valid XHTML. Switch that to br / and
try it w/o the CDATA. Also, it's great form to post a link to a
sample page if at all possible!
Mike
Kim Johnson wrote:
Given those exact things, do you three (or anyone
else) have an opinion on which would be better in php
or jquery? The auth, at least, will need to be almost
everywhere.
thanks,
-kim
Kim,
Keep your authentication state server side (via PHP's session). If you
do it
That was my gut reaction, but, I think that it's an example of
explicit use of a new Iterator interface, a way to make any object
work with for in .
But, I didn't read it that closely. It took 6-8 years to get to get
JavaScript and DOM stable enough for our current applications. I'm
not holding
That's an awesome quote on the main page. I expect a jQuery IDE soon that
actually WILL read my mind. I start typing:
$('span').filter('.links').cli
And a little red devo hat pops up with a little speech bubble and taps on my
screen: Excuse me, it looks like you're trying to add a click
Thanks Aaron. That unfortunately didn't make it any faster. Plus I don't
think you'd want to apply that filter expression after you've applied the
:first qualifier in the initial expression - that could leave you with
nothing even when there's a match somewhere on the page. Anyway, I had the
jQuerians,
This past month I have focused on rewriting the entirety of poMMo (GPL
PHP Mailing List Software). jQuery has become the base library for
template files, and a unique interface has been born. This would never
have been possible without jQuery, the great minds of this forum (err
hey, I am thrilled to get several replies so quickly.
The xml file contains greater-signs and less-signs. I had hoped to add
markup to my page. It works if I add markup and content with jquery, but
with xmlExec, it gets sanitized - I can only add plain content. It seems
fairly limiting,
I seem to get the same appearance with all combinations of br, br /, [CDATA],
or not [CDATA]. I still don't get functional markup.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/xmlExec---sanitized-output-tf2857111.html#a7984379
Sent from the jQuery Plugins mailing list archive
Hello Jonathan,
as Karl and Jörn already pointed out, at the time I'm coding a plugin
which handles all the selection stuff inside an input field / a
textarea. The latest Version also includes setSelection.
More information can be found in this thread:
I seem to get the same appearance with all combinations of br, br /, [CDATA],
or not [CDATA]. I still don't get functional markup.
Can you post a sample page somewhere? That would help us track it down.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
