apb wrote:
Fletch;303945 Wrote:
Um, did you try that? ;)
Nope 8-). I only had a little time to play around with it yesterday. So
is that known to work?
No, it's not known to work. That's why everyone keeps suggesting that
you just try it. Because we like wasting your time.
- Marc
y360 wrote:
A contrarian view: Logitech r-20 is best value for money. Small
footprint. Nice sound, front on/off button, headphone socket volume
knob. Perfect for a bedside system.
The Audioengines are way overpriced. The A2 doesn't even have a front
volume control.
Can't let that stand.
BlueWaves wrote:
So...Like the title says: Is there a way to use the classic Squeezebox
(the one with the nice large display) with the SB Duet's remote
controller?
As others have said, they work together just fine. What you can't do
currently, is _buy_ them together. The controller is
radish wrote:
I understand that. I just thought you wanted someone to create a page
for you to put this content on... it seemed to me like the page I
linked to would be a good location. Just add your charts to that page.
If you're looking for help actually creating the flow charts, well
max.spicer wrote:
I'm looking for a few 3.5mm female to RCA male cables in the UK. One
like this - http://www.trianglecables.com/255-036.html. I just
wondered if anyone could recommend a good online supplier in the UK.
The site I've linked to does ship to the UK, but it seems a bit daft to
Marc Sherman wrote:
Let me guess. R20? I've been looking for the same thing for my kids' rooms.
... in Canada, specifically. Anyone know?
- Marc
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo
MrSinatra wrote:
they aren't mutually exclusive.
They are, when you consider that SD has a very serialized product dev
cycle. I would much rather have them spend their time designing
something I'd like to buy, because they've got a great track record with
that.
- Marc
kdf wrote:
rm /usr/share/jive/applets/DefaultSkin/sounds/shutdown.wav
rm /usr/share/jive/jive/splash.wav
Uh, just to be safe, shouldn't that be:
mv /usr/share/jive/applets/DefaultSkin/sounds/shutdown.wav
/usr/share/jive/applets/DefaultSkin/sounds/shutdown.wav.disabled
mv
bklaas wrote:
interestingly, that's not really necessary (well, interesting to me,
I'm weird that way). Jive/SBC uses an overlay filesystem, which means
that you can't really do harm to the underlying base code. If you ever
screw things up in what seems like an irreparable way, just power it
perski wrote:
Received my duet. Very nice :-) However, high bitrate AAC files don't
seem to be playing smoothly. VERY jittery. Bit of a bummer since I
can't listen to any of my iTunes Plus songs. It doesn't seem to be a
network problem since Apple Lossless and high bitrate mp3 (320 kbps)
are
DanielTheGreat wrote:
On my music server I have about 15,000 flac files. I also have a few
hundred playlists, one in particular (all-nDTS.m3u) that contains the
paths of most of my non-DTS tracks (about 14,000) - I can't include my
DTS files because SlimServer corrupts them when replay gain
m1cross wrote:
Thanks to all the replies... i think i got now. i can listen to
computer, home stereo @ same time. i 'sync'd everything, and i LOVE
this duet!!! I can't wait to sit on the deck this summer or at the pool
bar and be able to change stations, volume, sources, etc... without
Mitch Harding wrote:
Hmmm. On my system it's not reporting there are any newer versions in
the stable tree. I've got the following line in my sources list:
deb http://debian.slimdevices.com stable main
I currently have version 7.0-17737 from late last week. I thought
there had been some
Ben Sandee wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Mitch Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have voted for this bug. Seems it would solve the problem nicely.
I don't think it will fix it retroactively, but certainly for future
releases. I voted for it as well.
Yeah, the only way to fix
Phil Leigh wrote:
I understand in general terms why some people feel uncomfortable with
non-GA software, but in this case you really need to make an exception.
This code is rock solid... IMHO it has LESS bugs than the current GA
code.
Sure, but one new bug that you don't know about yet is
mvalera wrote:
Please see my announcement at the top of each forum for details on the
delay.
I'll post the manual as soon as I get a final one.
Hey, Mike, please remember that some of us read this as a mailing list.
Forum announcements don't get gated to the mailing list. Posting a
JimC wrote:
Actually, everyone who preordered gets *free* shipping, upgraded to
Next Day (or Worldwide Express). We are really sorry about the delay
and figured we would pick up the tab for shipping AND upgrade it, as
well.
What, no pony? :)
- Marc
Ben Sandee wrote:
The funny thing is, which video output would they choose? Composite? God
no. Component? Eek, *three* extra ports. DVI? HDMI? The truth is they
would need *all* of them. It ceases to be a simple change at that point.
If you go that far, you might as well turn it into
Robin Bowes wrote:
There is a new product on the verge of being released: the Duet,
consisting of the Squeezebox Receiver and the Squeezebox Controller.
However, this does *not* replace the Squeezebox Classic as I believe
it is now known.
The seems like a bargain price.
The shop must
Shakey wrote:
Why doesn't Logitech develope a product, other than the Transporter for
those of us that want 24/96 capability without having to buy the
Transporter?
Because they've already developed one, called the Transporter, and you
haven't bought it. Why should they develop a second?
-
SuperQ wrote:
I will disagree on the Not open source statement. The software
source is open, but it's not Free Software as the FSF defines it.
There are many examples of Open Source applications that require
payment, don't allow modification, etc. (A number of PHP apps for
example).
jfalk wrote:
For the first time, I saw a squeezebox out front controlling the music
in a bar -- in my case, Haru Times Square here in NY. Does anyone else
see a lot of squeezeboxes powering public music collections in bars and
restaurants? It would seem to be so obvious compared to what most
Mike-B wrote:
The primary issue is whether or not Australia is being gouged on the
price. The answer is obviously yes. Furthermore, with the Transporter
not being available on the Logitech site for AUS customers one can only
assume that Australian customers are not a high priority. A shame,
Mike-B wrote:
I couldn't disagree more. This forum has many different areas and I
believe we are in the General Discussion (Kitchen Sink even) forum.
It seems to me that it would be far more likely - and satisfactory in
terms of finding others that do or don't share your view - for a group
Phil Leigh wrote:
See the thing is...you wouldn't need that EQ if it wasn't for those
Bose's (runs and hides behind sofa...aargh it's full of amp and
subwooofer!)
At least his stereo is safe from Daleks...
- Marc
___
discuss mailing list
Martin_z wrote:
Thanks for that rapid response.
A bit puzzled about the SqueezeCentre 7 - if Squeezebox Duet is just
about to be released, and it only works with SC 7, I would have sort of
expected a formal release of SC 7 by now
If I recall correctly, SS6 was still getting last minute
radish wrote:
What are they going to do, add support for Zune DRM? Great! Lot's of
people have been asking for that - maybe they could do PlaysForSure
while they're at it. It's not like they can magically add DRM to
mp3/flac/ogg.
The nightmare scenarios is that they add Zune/PFS drm
Diana Artemis wrote:
snarlydwarf wrote:
With debian, yes, you should do an uninstall and then an install because
the package name changed.
Thanks for this. Of course, on Debian 'uninstall' is not so simple.
Just doing aptitude remove slimserver will leave the configuration
files; is
radish wrote:
I personally think it will go two ways. My belief (and it's only that!)
is that we'll get basic IR functionality from the controller pretty
quickly, probably an offshoot from the exisiting IR Blaster SC plugin.
I also believe that at some point (could be quite a while) Logitech
livelock wrote:
ps. Not everone wants to have a powerful enough dedicated server
running SC.
Not everyone wants to buy the squeezebox, then.
- Marc
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
dean wrote:
Squeezebox Receiver, topless.
Oh, baby!
I find your ideas about J1, J5, J8, J9 and J11 intriguing, and would
like to subscribe to your newsletter. Any hints?
SW2 is also interesting, although the big RESET next to it makes its
intended purpose pretty clear.
- Marc
mflint wrote:
If Microslop were to buy Logitech, then so be it. Yes, we might lose
some of the cool-factor, but so what? The source is open, so someone
will fork it. And when it forks, the only thing lost is incremental
improvements to firmware. Which ain't that much of a loss, considering
seanadams wrote:
No, all the server code and included libraries are GPL or
GPL-compatible. A few of the other files that it comes with are not -
those are the graphics and the firmware binaries that are served up to
SB or browser clients. It is trivial to remove/replace those and still
have
Michael Herger wrote:
Has Microsoft every acquired a company where the acquisition was a
success?
I think they neither developped Excel from scratch nor SQL server.
SQL server wasn't a corporate acquisition; rather, it was a licensing
deal with Sybase (who are still around, and still
Pat Farrell wrote:
MelonMonkey wrote:
Now how about a discount for loyal forum participants? :)
Isn't this the same as asking for a pony?
Hey, it's worked for me in the past...
- Marc
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
erland wrote:
So just to get this out of the way once for all.
Let's say I'm going to get a new SqueezeBox device, screen or not
doesn't matter, and it will be connected with analogue cables to the
amplifier.
If I'm looking for the best audio quality, but isn't ready to pay for a
JimC wrote:
SB3 is still available and works a treat. If you don't feel that Duet
is worth it, you can still use the SB3 with the infrared remote or with
a Nokia 770/800, iPhone, etc. Duet is an extension to the product
family, providing in-hand control of all the SB/TP products in your
mkozlows wrote:
I dunno. Maybe if I decide to build a good bedside headphone system
it'd be useful, but otherwise it's actually less useful than an SB2/3.
I wonder if Logitech is going to keep the current model around?
I suspect that the fact that they're calling it Duet and not 4 is
norderney wrote:
I managed to get hold of a 10m CAT5 cable and I connected it from my
Router into the back of my SB1. I then went into SB1 setup and selected
the option Connect to an Ethernet Network. I then completed the rest
of the setup procedure. Then I played a FLAC music track, which
norderney wrote:
You asked Only a week ago you noticed this problem? What changed a
week ago?
That's my problem - Nothing has changed over the past couple of weeks,
as far as I am aware. I don't even think Microsoft have done one of
their many Windows Vista upgrades!!!
I'll bet that
norderney wrote:
Yes but would that affect the playback of FLAC music files ONLY?
Remember I can play MP3 files ok and I can access internet via wireless
all without any problems. Also FLAC files do play ok if I do not use
the Slimserver web browser. FLAC music files play fine even when I
2eleven wrote:
Thanks Felix - you're right - removing the plugin, restarting SC, and
power cycling the SB did the trick - the headphone output is back. So
then I went ahead and reinstalled the plugin, enabled it in SC, ~and~
enabled it in the player interface (the step I had missed previously)
Charlie Mac Prabs wrote:
Hello,
Personally, I used a solid state relay like this (MP240D4)
http://www.opto22.com/site/pr_details.aspx?item=MP240D4qs=100610121053,,,5,8;
The minimum signal voltage is 3 volts (SB3 3.3 volts)
He has an internal resistance of 1000 ohms therefore nothing to
2eleven wrote:
I have one of these though, and it works perfectly (despite it's
trigger voltage being rated at 5-30):
http://www.xantech.com/products/controllers_switchers/ac1.htm
How much was that, and where did you buy it? That website doesn't seem
to have any details about where to buy
Charlie Mac Prabs wrote:
Hello,
You will find attached the Schema used for PowerSwitchII.
- The solid state relay cut directly feed 220 Volts of the amplifier
- No external power needed
- The minimum signal voltage is 3 volts (for MP240D4 or MP120D4)
- 2.3 mA power consumption (with MP240D4)
TurnipMan wrote:
Does that mean I have to go back to the mother-in-law for another?
My wife is suggesting that the remotes should have been drop tested
and be made to survive successive five foot drops onto a wooden floor.
My kitchen remote has survived multiple 5' drops to a tile floor,
DrNic wrote:
I'm just tetchy thanks to the 1 week old new arrival at home that won't
sleep - any suggestions for that?! :)
SQLPlaylist to the rescue!
-- PlaylistName:Sleep with Lullabies
-- PlaylistGroups:
-- PlaylistOption Unlimited:1
-- PlaylistStartAction1:cli:mixer volume 50
--
jaysung wrote:
Hello,
just a question... I am perfectly satisfied with ss 6.5.4 and since it
needs a bit of work to port sc7.0 to the Thecus N5200 I wonder how and
if I can use the latest firmware for Tp with ss 6.5.4 since it is
supposed to solve some problems.
Firmware versions are tied to
westiebj wrote:
http://www.datakits.co.uk/store/slim-devices-transporter-black-wireless-network-music-streamer-p-4594.html
Here's another link for you:
http://www.google.ca/search?q=datakits%20uk%20consumer%20complaint
- Marc
___
discuss mailing list
cliveb wrote:
I suspect there's some kind of auto-catalytic network in operation
here. Producers ask for things to be loud, so mastering engineers
oblige. Radio listeners like what they hear, so they buy the CDs.
Mastering engineers notice that compressed stuff is what people seem to
want, so
dcote wrote:
is there a difference between the headphone jack and the RCA (cinch)
connectors?
i find there is a tremendous one - on my equipment the RCA connectors
definitely sound more powerful and fuller.
but apparently (according to other users) this differs depending on
your audio
minstrel wrote:
Thanks again for everyone's input. It's a keeper. One day I'll get a
proper DAC, but this will have to do for now with a baby on the way.
You might be surprised to discover that you already own a proper DAC --
the DAC in the sb3 is rather impressive.
- Marc
This isn't specifically a Squeezebox question, but there are a lot of
people here who are very knowledgeable when it comes to 802.11, so I was
hoping to tap into the group mind here for some advice.
I recently moved my server and router to another room in my basement,
and my wireless reception
Mark Lanctot wrote:
Yes, the rack is possibly interfering with the signal, but probably your
biggest problem is you have the router in the worst possible location.
I've always been told routers/APs need elevation, and I have mine about
as high in my residence as I can, no reception problems
morris_minor wrote:
Us folks who've embraced the SB3 know what a quality device it is. But
if you aren't too computer savvy, setting it up may be a problem. I
wonder how many SB3s will be returned by customers who haven't
persevered (or just couldn't be bothered) to get in running. It's not
gregious wrote:
This started happening to me today as well. And it's happening with
playlists I actually created using slimserver that I've had for months.
All my playlists are empty. Hello slimsupport? Issue with the new
version?
This isn't slimsupport. This is slimusercommunity. You need to
gdg wrote:
Now I can't even delete a playlist.
This is just bull. What is the problem with this company? Slimserver
started as a barely functional way to organize one's music and it's
getting worse every time a new version comes out. How is it possible
that one can't delete and artist or
bLanark wrote:
I took the injured remote apart tonight, and the soldered connections to
the infra-red LED had come loose. A quick application of a hot iron, and
the control worked fine.
The case is a little different, as although I was careful when prising
it apart, the gap/join along the
Squid wrote:
First of all I wonder why you would want to put tracks from 1 album
into multiple directories. Sounds like a very weird way of structuring
your tracks.
When I rip CDs with bonus tracks, I put the bonus tracks in a subdir
named Bonus. That way they're available, but they don't
Jay_S wrote:
It does the same thing with my wired connections. I'm going to try
taking my wifi router out of the chain.
So far, Panasonic's support sucks! But that's just because they're
closed right now and I can't complain to anyone.
Do you have DSL? Did you remember to plug the phone
mdzak wrote:
I am a happy owner of a squeezebox attached to a denon stereo amplifier.
recently i start having a weared problem.
after playing the device for a while part of the lcd lines just shuts
off, dissapear ...if like some one took an eraser and erase is
longitudinaly. each time i have
radish wrote:
The password is stored in the players' flash memory which is wiped
during the firmware upgrade. It's not really intended that you switch
firmware on such a frequent basis - is there a reason you are running
different server versions?
Firmware is only wiped on downgrades, not on
slim_maikel wrote:
Thanks a lot, that looks promising. I'll give it a go.
There's a debug setting (D_IR, I think, but I'm not certain) that will
log the raw codes for every remote press. You can set that, then press
every button on your bose remote, and use that data to write your own
bose.ir
trecital wrote:
It's one thing to have bought faulty goods. Not necessarily the
retailers fault. But then, when they fail to respond promptly to
resolve the problem, I think anyone is justified in losing confidence
and exercising their legal rights. It's people who fail to take action
when
stevekdavis wrote:
Listed under C not A. I have a few (less than 10 out of about 900
artists that do this). I've looked at the tags in these artists and
even re-written them but they still come up in the wrong place.
Another example in my list is sheryl crow, listed under C.
Just now
kdf wrote:
Sike;226794 Wrote:
I know i am a sucker for shiny functional tech gear, but if someone
could just throw me a bone here and tell me if something shinier is
coming out.. ;)
You'll never get much in that department. SD/Logitech won't comment on
future hardware plans.
True, but
jsunandmax wrote:
UPDATE: i just verified they DO have the same MAC address! different
IPs but same MAC. can anyone tell me how to manually change that, so
they are different? (which i assume they should be?)
thanks in advance!
Do the physical labels on the back of the SBs show the same
erland wrote:
IMO the problem isn't the open source model, the problem is that there
needs to be a single person/group that decides how all users wants it
to work.
As you have already said, the current SlimServer tries to make everyone
happy, the result is that it makes some advanced
Pat Farrell wrote:
Aynsley Blake wrote:
Am I right in thinking that a silver SB must be a version 2? Or
were the different colours introduced into the SB1?
There were colors on the SB1. Custom sprayed by some autobody dude.
The wayback machine knows all:
flashgordon wrote:
I'm the OP. I ordered mine from Datakits using a credit card, on
03.08.07 and it arrived 07.08.07, no problems at all. It has the
SlimDevices name on the unit, but the remote control is a Logitech
one.
Very pleased.
You seem to be the only one. From a quick google
erland wrote:
The reason for the SqueezeBox increase is probably because Logitech
feels like they have higher distribution costs to ship the product from
US to Europe than what for example Komplett.se have. This feels a bit
strange to me, but if you look at some other Logitech products, you
MrSinatra wrote:
i'm sorry, but to me, having a device that needs me to run stuff on my
computer is old school. yes, SN is a good workaround, for everything
EXCEPT your own local music. (SN basically emulates the fat device i
am talking about, but doesn't do your local tunes AND requires
snarlydwarf wrote:
. Higher cost for many people (ie, my server is also my router, file
server and web server).
Exactly. It was the fact that the SD model fit in so nicely with my
existing home server infrastructure that attracted me to the squeezebox
in the first place. I already had all of my
mwoodroof wrote:
Then when I go through the next stage, trying the auto DHCP setup, it
fails to connect and I get a 169 IP address. I think this means that I
need to use a static IP address (same as I was doing on my last
router).
Does your router run a DHCP server? If not, then you'll have
Rick B. wrote:
SteveEast;217277 Wrote:
The ancient 659 is still available too. Same MSRP as the 555. I've
used one for a couple of years now and it's a great remote. I
especially like the hard buttons for Music, TV and Movies which pretty
much cover my needs.
Steve.
I still use the 659,
aw4 wrote:
I have the same problem with my Transporter. It is driving me mad. I
had to unplug the Transporter twice last night. I've been trying to
fix this for the last few months, but the problem always returns.
Someone needs to take ownership for this issue
This is a user community;
Furry wrote:
I've found that when I change from the SlimServer running on my laptop
(v6.5.3) to that running on my QNAP (v6.5.1), the SB3 firmware gets
downgraded from 81 to 72.
The SB3 then needs me to take it through the full wireless setup,
including telling it its in Europe and
Pandora's Box wrote:
thanks for replying you all.
I wanted to by from a US resellar (or reseller?).
But he is offering one for the US-market. I wanted to buy it some
cheaper then in the netherlands. ;-))
The only difference is the wall wart. You can easily find a compatible
wall wart
tomjtx wrote:
I do have the original box and the price just went to 2,000
You are bidding on a Slim Devices branded Squeezebox box.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/11/19/ceci_nest_pas_une_xbox/
:)
- Marc
___
discuss mailing list
mvalera wrote:
Basically anywhere they don't have a real stereo setup.
I live in SF, and every time I go to a party here I see them. I was
just at a BBQ last weekend with an iPod and (coincidentally) Logitech
mm28 iPod speakers.
I would definitely buy an SB Boombox. I threw my first big
JJZolx wrote:
seanadams;211396 Wrote:
If I had to go from only those pictures, I'd guess SB2 because I think I
can make out the shape of the 320x32 VFD glass near the IR sensor. Also,
it's silver and I think we only did SB2s in that color.
I have an SB1 in 'silver', although it's a bit
jdryyz wrote:
Sean, I was only asking where the info on the remote using JVC codes is
mentioned in writing, not that I required additional documentation.
This is just to satisfy my curiosity, mind you. You've already answered
the important question. I will be able to act on it right away.
You
nicketynick wrote:
Sorry, what I meant was 'more complicated to use' than a router.
Certainly the box needs more processing power, more memory, USB input.
But only a dedicated (to slimserver) user interface, and no easy access
to an OS for amateurs like me to screw up! I keep bricking my
davep wrote:
Simple. Go into player settings and select the 'Menu' item. In the
page that opens you can select and deselect individual items to be
shown and the order in which they appear. You could add 'Artists' and
then move this up to the top of your menu list so that it will come up
as
I just got a new SB3 (white sale model), and I'm finding the remote a
lot more sensitive than the old SB1 remote was. I'm frequently hitting
double-clicks when I try to press a button only once. It's definitely
the remote -- when I use my sb1 remote with the new sb3, it doesn't happen.
Have
JimC wrote:
Actually, the warranty is 2 years. The text on the website was
incorrect and we're in the process of correcting that. If you look at
the limited warranty info in the manual, you'll find it correctly
stated at 2 years.
When was that updated to 2 years (from the original 1
GoCubs wrote:
nicketynick;206699 Wrote:
I'm thinking the same thing.
Pins needles.
I say give it at least a month to get people out of the 30 day window
and I'm sure whatever is on the horizon will require SlimServer 7.0
which is far from ready.
What am I missing here? What happened
MelonMonkey wrote:
Wow, shortening the life of the product versus shortening the life of
the planet... Which will I choose.
Don't be a tool. Turn off crap you're not using.
It's not quite so simple. Reducing the lifespan of the device means that
you have to replace it more often, and
andyg wrote:
The build doesn't include any time stamps, so it's possible the md5sum
wouldn't change if there were no checkins. Let me know if tonight's
works for you.
Yup, that seems to have done the trick. So this is actually a feature
(the md5sum only changes when there's a substantive
Is 6.5.3 not being built nightly any more? I don't see any new debian
releases being posted in the testing dist.
Thanks,
- Marc
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
andyg wrote:
Nightly builds look fine, and the deb should be updated every night.
Hrm. Yeah, the repository does have a current date stamp. However, it
looks like the deb's md5sum hasn't changed since the 25th. Does the
build not include any current time stamping at all? If so, that might
nathanroberts1 wrote:
Good for them. I'm not at all interested in MySpace and the like, but
last.fm is superb. They deserve success, and I'm sure that if the
present team stays in control they won't allow it to become a
compromised corporate tool.
Yeah, until they go and change the logo. :)
Pale Blue Ego wrote:
My expectations are the same as those of the people complaining the
loudest. The difference is, I'm not having any of the problems they
are. I've been using slimserver for 5 years and it just works. I
used to stay several months behind the current release, just to be
shermoid wrote:
thank you very much for this usefil info and the suggestion! i use a
linux system, and wonder if any of these programs you're referring to
have linux version. i do not own ANYTHING that comes from microsoft.
:)
There are plenty of linux tools that can move/rename mp3
shermoid wrote:
well, while i appreciate what you're saying, any company that's
destined to stay in business will do exactly that - they will work on
legacy products if a customer demands it. how do i know? i'm a
software engineer. i have re-worked decades old code upon demand,
because
shermoid wrote:
* you can fix your own 1.0.13 kernel, as you have full access to the
sourcec code. do i have full access to slimdevices source code?
You're kidding, right? The problems you're having don't have anything to
do with the closed-source firmware. Feel free to fix the problem in
shermoid wrote:
if i had access to slimdevices' code, i'd fix the problem in my old
6.2.1 version myself! but, i do not have such access, and must ask
slimdevices to make the change for me. i'm sure the actual problem (in
pseudocode) is to change a line that looks like this:
Seriously, are
strindberg wrote:
When I then (quite politely, IMHO) complained about this lack of
response in these forums, which supposedly is the main way of providing
support to users, I was met with insults by a senior member.
You're mistaken about that. This is not [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is
a _user_
bukharin wrote:
For anyone who's interested, I've changed all of the English text in
strings.txt to Australian English. This means that favorites becomes
favourites, etc. It's nice to have everything look correct!
Ahem. First of all, your subject is missing some subjects (of the Queen,
that
amcluesent wrote:
I'm thinking SqueezePod, like an SB3 with an iPod dock, so you can
navigate the iPod contents and see it on the SB display and playout on
the SB SPDIF and analog connection.
And SqueezeShow, with an HDMI output able to do video up to 1080p with
support for divx codecs.
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo