I'm too lazy to bother with robocopy or similar - I found a windows
synching utility somewhere (will track down its name when I'm there) -
it runs a scheduled job to find and synch changes and new content from
the ripping machine (winXP) to the media server (FC3). The ripping
machine is also
Just tried it. Looks nice, no obvious problems but I have to say I find
it much harder to read from my couch than the default font. Would work
for me if there was less of a gap but we've got about 4m between the
couch and the Sb here.
--
bossanova808
Jeff Moore Wrote:
2005-07-05-23:36:19 BugDave:
Is it possible to use slimserver on my mac to stream to my shoutcast
server that's on a server with a lot more bandwidth..
Well... a Rube Goldberg solution, with so many intermediate steps the
complexity of the edifice would almost be fun
kdf Wrote:
can your shoutcast server connect to:
http://slimserverIP:9000/stream.mp3 ?
if so, then the server will see the shoutcast server as an http client
and you
can select tunes via the web interface and control playback from
there.
-kdf
I suppose i could but that would mean i
Quoting BugDave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
kdf Wrote:
can your shoutcast server connect to:
http://slimserverIP:9000/stream.mp3 ?
if so, then the server will see the shoutcast server as an http client
and you
can select tunes via the web interface and control playback from
there.
The Multiple Items In Tags option (in Server Settings, Behavior) seems
not to work for album titles but only for artists and genre. According
to the description it should also work for album titles.
Another problem exists when I have an album with multiple artists (say
artist 1 and artist 2) and
max.spicer Wrote:
The work in particular (Rite of Spring) has been split into tracks, but
each track has absolutely no pause between it and the previous track.
This is the sort of thing that I would imagine could suffer badly when
played via mp3s (well, flac actually), but the SB2 just
Using 6.1.b1 latest. on mac 10.4.1. ~ 12,000 tracks.
Is anyone else loosing contact when browsing the new music all
songs folder? Contact lost from 2 mins to 4 mins, sb comes back on as
normal after this time.
This is reproducible.
Consulting console with d_info set the server is checking
Hi radish,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 01:30:26PM -0700, radish wrote:
While xmms may be able to play it, I've never heard of ID3 being valid
on an Ogg file, so I wouldn't be surprised if lots of apps had trouble
playing it. My advice is to convert the ID3 to real Vorbis tags.
Thanks for that
kdf Wrote:
then use winamp to connect to slimserver, same url. use browser to
control, set
the player settings-audio-bitrate limiting to something reasonable
for your
connection bandwidth and go for it. Of course, this is optimised for
single
use, but slimserver isn't really designed to
I'm not that up on linux tools for tagging, but vorbiscomment is the
generic app for writing the tags
(http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man1/vorbiscomment.1.html). If you're
good with sed awk that might be enough, otherwise one of these tools
should be helpful :
Steven Moore wrote:
Using 6.1.b1 latest. on mac 10.4.1. ~ 12,000 tracks.
Is anyone else loosing contact when browsing the new music all songs
folder? Contact lost from 2 mins to 4 mins, sb comes back on as normal
after this time.
This is reproducible.
Consulting console with d_info set
20 second pause here, using 6/5 nightly on Linux with 698 albums
with 7881 songs by 740 artists. Check your mac's performance, is it
pegging the CPU? What skin are you using? I get a 50 second pause
using ExBrowse2 instead of Fishbone.
Not using the web browser just the sb itself, perl
Hello all,
For the last two years I ahve, on and off, been trying to get callerID
working reliably from my server to my slim players. I've tried YAK and
my preference Who's Calling which does Slim integration natively.
With both of these programs I get the display on my server monitor when
a call
Quoting Steven Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes I thought it was some sort of performance issue rather than a
bug. Could these tracks not be read into a cache on slim server start
up or after a rescan?
loading all tracks into a memory cache was the method before 6.0. People hated
it and kept
In response to a comment I added to a bug report, Ben Sandee told me,
although I haven't tried this yet, that SlimServer supports certain
ID3v2 tags that let you specify sorting criteria that are separate
from the artist/album name. These tags are TSOP and TSOA for
performer and album sort order,
On 7/6/05, A.J. Aranyosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to a comment I added to a bug report, Ben Sandee told me,
although I haven't tried this yet, that SlimServer supports certain
ID3v2 tags that let you specify sorting criteria that are separate
from the artist/album name. These tags
--On July 5, 2005 10:16:59 PM -0700 Randall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again, and I'm always open for suggestions!
To which I reply:
How about cutting a dado in the back of the face frame, just deep enough
that if you stick in the hook or fabric side of some stick-on velcro, then
My thoughts also MrC. Does anybody know if you get the same problems
with real squeezeboxes or is it just soft-squeeze?
I note the softsqueeze web site says Only the first track is delayed,
synchronization seems fine after that. - In earlier version of
Softsqueeze the first track probably will
Hello All,
I have a song collection of about 20,000 songs. My problem is that the
database scan does not pick up approx 5000 of the songs on disk. I have
tried running the latest 6.1b and 6.0 nightlies.
This has been a problem for me since moving to the 6.0 release.
Are there any limitations
Quoting Steve Burling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On July 5, 2005 10:16:59 PM -0700 Randall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again, and I'm always open for suggestions!
Another idea, depending upon the size of the configuration, you might be able to
get one of those plastic electrical boxes. I'm
brinko99 Wrote:
Hello All,
I have a song collection of about 20,000 songs. My problem is that the
database scan does not pick up approx 5000 of the songs on disk. I have
tried running the latest 6.1b and 6.0 nightlies.
This has been a problem for me since moving to the 6.0 release.
You could always depend on gravity to hold it in. The unit will be
back-heavy, and will want to rotate in that direction. The frame will
prevent it from rotating into the wall, so all you need to do is
prevent it from slipping down. The mounting bracket itself might be
enough to do that, or
sleepysurf Wrote:
I've been listening primarily to Radioio feeds.
My SB2 arrived yesterday (and now I have to leave town for five
days--isn't that like taking a kid's Christmas present away?)
Anyway, this was one of the first things I noticed, after the
Well well..
I was formulating a very detailed description of my system and it's
formatting and layout when I discoved the problem.
My U2 directory is formatted as such:
X:\mp3\U2\Concerts\U2 - album\## - U2 - song.mp3
X:\mp3\U2\Misc\U2 - song.mp3
X:\mp3\U2\The Singles\U2 - album\## - U2 -
Ben Sandee wrote:
On 7/6/05, A.J. Aranyosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to a comment I added to a bug report, Ben Sandee told me,
although I haven't tried this yet, that SlimServer supports certain
ID3v2 tags that let you specify sorting criteria that are separate
from the
brinko99 Wrote:
Within the directory The Singles, there was a shortcut for some reason
to X:\mp3\U2.
This caused the Slimserver to stop scanning and not pickup anything
after that. There were no songs in the database at all after U2.
I don't know if this is expected behavior but
Sounds like we need somebody to write a RadioioGain plug-in g.
--
sleepysurf
aerius i, nht sub two, yamaha rx-v1000 (pre/pro), sunfire cinema grand
200 ~five (vertically bi-amped), squeezebox2 (streaming cd-quality
audio), 300gb buffalo linkstation (remote flac audio file storage),
blue jeans
JJZolx Wrote:
Whether it's expected would have to be answered by the developers. Is
scanning halted whenever a circular reference is detected? Seems like
it should recover more gracefully.
I don't know if the scanning is actually haulted. I only really know
that that no artists are picked
Just wanted to take a few minutes to thank you folks at Slim Devices for
a superb product and maybe let a few lurkers out there know what a great
product this is.
First thing I noticed was that UPS was not too nice with the box. I
thought to myself, Wish they would have packed this inside
On 7/6/05, Michael Amster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is exactly what I want. I have been using EasyTag. I will see if
it supports TSOP and TSOA. What platform does MusicBrainz run on (I am
Linux at home)?
Michael,
You can see for yourself at musicbrainz.org. The SDK is GPL but the
main
Dave D Wrote:
Often a great product shows up with a substandard UI and it's a real
shame (I am not necessarily referring to Roku here.)
I am! That thing is horrid, horrid, horrid. The PlaysForSure
capability was a very good thing (and I really do believe that this
stuff is going to be
Mkozlows,
I hope you'll also share your impressions after trying Squeezebox2.
It is really a huge advancement from Squeezebox1, let alone any
competing tubular products.
--
seanadams
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
I also use firstname, lastname, but my question to both of you is: Why
do you still have CDs on the shelf? Mine are all in boxes in the
basement. ;-)
I've got my shelves behind glass doors in the living room. Nowadays it's
merely decoration I guess (I haven't got anything else
34 matches
Mail list logo
