Hello all,
I am having an issue with the cfmail tag. In the instance of use,
everything seems to be in order (syntax, required attributes, data is
valid) but for some reason, the tag will not fire an email. I have tried
everything I know of to try (verifying the query data, eliminating the
I believe there are a couple of open source mail bouncing applications on
riaforge.com as well as Ray Camden had a small utility that was created an
additional interface in your ColdFusion administrator to inspect your mail
spool. These could help in your troubleshooting.
Teddy R. Payne, ACCFD
Thanks for the input.
I think what I might not have been clear on is that, when the code is executed,
there is no file being created at all. I watched the server’s spool folder and
when testing this snippet, no .cfmail file or any other file ever appeared.
That is what I find most strange
At the risk of stating
the obvious, here is what I would do:
1. Dump the values for
your vars and hardcode them in a CFMAIL statement
with a very basic subject and body2.
If that looks good but still fails to send,
another troubleshooting step is to use telnet
from your CF server and send
And if that doesn't seem to work, here's another. It's a stretch, but it
just does not make sense that a CFMAIL would do nothing at all (not generate
a file in the spool). When you say you did other snippets, did you do them
in this very same template? I mean the exact one, in the same place, on
I tested the new snippet in the exact same place in the same template.
It tested successfully. I also added some output on the page that was
based on running the isValid() function against the email addresses that
the mail is being generated to and from. Again, that tested
successfully. However,
Well, it surely does now seem clearly related to the generated CFPARAMs. If
you're saying there's nothing in the mail.log, how about in the -out log for
the instance (in jrun4/logs)? If there's no message there, it would seem
the way to debug this is to change your loop that creates the
Hey folks, for reasons I won't bother to elaborate on, notes from me to the
list from about 3 weeks ago were not making it. Some of them were replies to
notes from others, while some were notes from me.
I'll go ahead and send them along again, with apologies, for the benefit of
any interested
Here's one of the old notes that didn't make it...
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Arehart [mailto:careh...@carehart.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:04 PM
To: 'discussion@acfug.org'
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] weird cfinput vs input stuff. date is shown as
{d '2009-02-12'} vs
Here's another of the old notes that didn't make it...
From: Charlie Arehart [mailto:careh...@carehart.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:12 PM
To: 'discussion@acfug.org'
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] weird cfinput vs input stuff. date is shown as
{d '2009-02-12'} vs 02/12/2009
You
Here's another of the old notes that didn't make it...
From: Charlie Arehart [mailto:careh...@carehart.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:54 PM
To: 'discussion@acfug.org'
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF Applications hosted on third party
webserver/hosting services
Ajas, I've seen
Here's another of the old notes that didn't make it...
From: Charlie Arehart [mailto:careh...@carehart.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 12:11 AM
To: 'discussion@acfug.org'
Subject: how did cfid/cftoken get exposed? RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF
Applications hosted on third party
Here's another of the old notes that didn't make it...
From: Charlie Arehart [mailto:careh...@carehart.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 11:15 PM
To: 'discussion@acfug.org'
Subject: three of our own interviewed on CFConversations podcast: two in the
past two weeks
Hey folks, if
Here's another of the old notes that didn't make it...
From: Charlie Arehart [mailto:careh...@carehart.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 11:29 PM
To: 'discussion@acfug.org'
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CF Applications hosted on third party
webserver/hosting services
Ajas, you
14 matches
Mail list logo
