Re: Read only Test Was: Speeding up tests

tests are really read only ? If yes, I would be interested. If no, then (sorry to say this), but the "read-only" part is only wishful thinking. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post

Re: DoS using POST via hash algorithm collision

n 32-bit/64-bit Python, i'm not sure there are even any or we would get a report on that, wouldn't we ?). I think it's important for the Django core team to voice their opinion on this matter in python-dev. Thank you!, Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to th

Re: End-user defined fields, how would you approach it?

this list, we have the right to > discuss things which feels on topic with this list without being > discriminated for no reasons. > You're not discriminated - everyone is treated the same way here and judged only by their actions. By disobeying the rules of this list, you're disrespectin

Re: Feature request: Unicode collation algorithm in django

y from the database, > with django itself providing some version of the Unicode collation > algorithm: > > http://unicode.org/reports/tr10/ > > This might hook into django's internationalization and localization > features, and/or be accessible at a lower level, e.g., with a keywo

Re: Feature request: Unicode collation algorithm in django

llate.html [2]: SQLite doesn't support UCA by default, but lets you define any collation: http://docs.python.org/library/sqlite3.html#sqlite3.Connection.create_collation [3]: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14225/ch9sql.htm#i1006311 -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received t

Re: Feature request: Unicode collation algorithm in django

2012/2/2 Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com>: > On 2 February 2012 03:34, Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi.kaariai...@thl.fi> wrote: >> >> Now, my proposed solution would be to have some way of doing: >> SELECT name, ... >> FROM authors >> ORDER BY name collate

Re: Feature Request: Client side validation classes for forms

.dajaxproject.com/ does exactly that. What I would like to see instead is providing HTML5 attributes for standard fields and making it easier to add ones to custom ones. Some simple to implement ones are: "required", min/max for number fields, max_length for a textarea. Regular expr

Re: auth.User usernames

GSOC), so that we can fix things like that. So the general solution would be doing that ;). Just changing it, helps new installations, but breaks old ones. PS. Since Facebook started generating fake addresses, 75 characters on the email field is also no good, so matching that doesn't solve any

Moving to ... Github vs Bitbucket

or similar features... sometimes "similar" is not enough. I'm not a regular Bitbucket user, so I maybe just didn't discover that, but how can you add per line comments in patches on Bitbucket ? Without that, code reviews for non-trivial patches is a real PITA. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You rece

Re: Moving to ... Github vs Bitbucket

hink a few times more before sending that. Also, it wasn't my intention to "bash bitbucket" or anything like that so sorry for that too. I'll just shut up now and let the silence hide this thread. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr

Re: Class-based view decorators

that. The super() problem actually makes a great Python puzzle so it's easy to remember the dangers after solving it ;) [1]: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14512 [2]: https://github.com/lqc/django/blob/cbvdecoration_ticket14512/tests/regressiontests/utils/decorators.py#L120 -- Łukasz Reku

Re: Discrepancy involving choices with ModelForm and Form

lready, so an extra label shouldn't surprise you. [1]: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.3/ref/forms/fields/#django.forms.ModelChoiceField.empty_label -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, se

Re: Django and dictionary ordering

n 822.943s FAILED (failures=39, errors=1, skipped=109, expected failures=2) It's a bare install, so there may be more within the skipped ones. Most look harmless and only needs updating the testcases, so it doesn't require specific order. Created ticket https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17758 -

Re: Revisiting multiline tags

If it was such a big issue, that LOTS would either spam this list or fork Django long ago. With a clear BDFL veto, it's better to search for an alternate solution then waste everyone's energy on a bikeshed. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the G

Re: Revisiting multiline tags

On 24 February 2012 17:29, Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com> wrote: > With all the voting and aesthetic discussion, maybe let's get back to > technical details: > > On 24 February 2012 05:18, colinta <coli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 1) It's an easy fix. > > Mayb

Re: Revisiting multiline tags

meone actually provides a patch with no performance hit. Really, we know people fork Django for their private use. If this is such a big deal, we should have at least one person using this in production for a while now and have an excellent quality patch to show. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this mes

Re: Revisiting multiline tags

ters to the {% with %} and/or make an include with changed context. A year after, It turns out the use cases aren't so rare anymore. Now, if your blocktrans contains 10 variables and all have more then 2 dots in them, then maybe there are other reasons that it looks ugly then lack of multi-lin

Re: Django participation in Google Summer of Code 2012

at > means a large update (if not a reboot) of the py3k branch. > Why would you want to do that, when the py3k is already working with unicode_literals ? That's a step backwards. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Djan

Re: The model class should have default ``__cmp__`` method.

del can have an UUIDField as it's pk instead of a sequential integer). For making assertions about QuerySets, there already is assertQuerysetEqual(), so -1 on adding __cmp__ to Model. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django de

Re: authentication by email

quot;we don't want to have to fix this again" thing. [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.3.1.1 -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-

Re: authentication by email

On 9 March 2012 21:10, Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2012/3/9 Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com>: >> On 9 March 2012 17:46, Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Lets look at one isolated aspect. The User email field i

Re: [GSOC 2012] Customizable serialization

ration + presentation)? This is what most REST frameworks do. First you serialize the objects into Python native types, then render it to any format. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to

Status of issue 17758: dict ordering bugs

/commit/84dc450ec861e34de068fde891537f0481342ef7 -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email

Re: Status of issue 17758: dict ordering bugs

On 22 March 2012 13:38, Ramiro Morales <cra...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/3/22 Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com>: > > Maybe we should split these problem reports in their own tickets? > I can do it later today. There probably should be 3 tickets: the ORM bug, th

Re: Status of issue 17758: dict ordering bugs

On 22 March 2012 16:54, Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote: > Le 22 mars 2012 13:22, Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> If the whole patch can't be merged, lets at least fix that bug[2]. Is >> there any work I can do to make i

Re: Status of issue 17758: dict ordering bugs

:) -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

Re: Tagging 1.4 django release in Subversion

gt; Well, it is the kind of magic that gets you burned at the stake for > witchcraft :-) > That only means it must be effective ;) As for the GitHub migration, I noticed this little repo[1]. Are you collecting only major contributors or is it open for pull requests ? [1]: https://github

Re: Tagging 1.4 django release in Subversion

On 27 March 2012 03:01, Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 27 March 2012 02:44, Reinout van Rees <rein...@vanrees.org> wrote: >> > On 26-03-12 18:13, F

Re: suggestion: Don't make the tag "url" dirty in Django1.5

want to enable passing context variables as view names? Did you notice that almost everywhere in the template language literal strings are quoted? Technical arguments usualy work better then calling things "stupid". -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are su

Re: suggestion: Don't make the tag "url" dirty in Django1.5

, not yet. There's a features/py3k branch, but I'm not sure if it's up to date with Tarek's bitbucket repo. My bet is that py3k merge will happen after the GitHub migration which everyone seems to be busy with ;) -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: suggestion: Don't make the tag "url" dirty in Django1.5

On 27 March 2012 14:44, Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 March 2012 14:22, Shaggy <kfu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> and btw. is there repo for developing 1.5 with python3 support? >> > > AFAIK, not yet. There's a features/py3k branch

Dropping django.utils.simplejson

"django.utils.simplejson" in 1.5 and remove it 1.6 3) Replace the code with anyjson, so it does something useful: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/anyjson What do you think ? -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django de

Re: Dropping django.utils.simplejson

it, so you can decide about it at the project level. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send

Re: Ticket for Docs improvement Was: Proposal: upgrading the choices machinery for Django

der] >> I' sure you meant: def greet(self): return {self.MALE: 'Hi, boy', self.FEMALE: 'Hi, girl.'}[self.gender] Unless you defined MALE/FEMALE as globals too :) Otherwise you'll get a NameError. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

Re: Ticket for Docs improvement Was: Proposal: upgrading the choices machinery for Django

re. > That's not how it works. Code that executes when creating a new class does not define a lexical scope. There is no such thing as "class scope". Try it yourself: http://ideone.com/xbr0q -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Errors in tests

e, it means it's a non-empty sequence that's not a subclass of dict, right? Did you manage to track what type of value it is? There must be a bug somewhere else too. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" g

Re: GitHub migration planning

ossibly want to have is a way to create extra constraints on the tags, but as a matter of fact, the current Trac instance doesn't do that! (you can have an issue with "tests needed" but without "patch needs improvement"). -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because

Re: FYI: Trac downtime today

On 25 April 2012 17:32, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <ja...@jacobian.org> wrote: > OK, done! Thanks for your patience. > > Jacob Am I supposed to see the "Admin" tab or did I just haven't noticed it before? -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscr

Re: FYI: Trac downtime today

ts", etc. to do triaging. Now that I know I have access to it, I'm scared I'll break something be accident ;) -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to dja

Re: I think adding a "first" method to the QuerySet be useful.

h (depends on DB): qs = User.objects.all() user = None if not qs else qs[0] F) Use the iterator protocol user = next(iter(User.objects.all()), None) # you can add LIMIT or not, see Alex's comment -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go

Re: Python 3 - style question

On 10 August 2012 18:56, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > I think Option 2 is better, for the reasons you state. > How about wrapping those 3 lines of code into a class decorator (preferably named more explicit then StrAndUnicode) ? That would be at least a little DRY.

Re: Breaking out localflavor

t; models. I'm pretty sure everyone with South will still be pretty unhappy about updating all their migration files. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-d

Re: django.test.client.Client tests in Django development?

on to an unauthorized session in hope it will become authorized again can be anything but a bug. Regards, Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To u

Re: URL dispatcher slow?

and post if I find anything interesting. [1]: https://gist.github.com/3875701 -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To u

Re: Django produce sql with table name different then specified in meta db_table

l into 30 char limit. PS. I'm pretty sure you want to have: db_table='"mnoworka"."defined_daily_dose"' If the name is already quoted, Django won't alter it. OTOH, see issue #18514 (which shouldn't be a problem if you have managed=False). [1]: https://code.djangopr

Re: Django produce sql with table name different then specified in meta db_table

rs to make them part of > the name. But -- save length issues -- the ploy succeeds: It seems none of the backends implement any form of quote escaping in their quote_name() methods. But is it actually possible to have a table in Oracle with a name containing a double quote? -- Łukasz Re

Re: Django produce sql with table name different then specified in meta db_table

name\"' > > This only works for unmanaged models. For managed models it results in an > error when it tries to create the sequence and trigger using syncdb. Why all the slashes ? Unless you specify r'' or make them double, they don't do anything! >>> '\"' == '"' Tru

Re: Admin UI improvement - actions displayed as buttons rather than drop-down list

Hi, Isn't this https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/19235 ? Regards, Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from

Re: Class based views: A standard hook for http-method-independent code (and a proposal for an init() method)

to join the thread as they feel their views are represented. Personally, I don't see any big advantage of having a yet another init method, but OTOH I already replaced Django's view hierarchy with my own, as I needed a more advanced data flow. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this m

Re: Charset for URL decoding (#19468)

e case. After all, the %-coded bytes can be some binary data that's not possible to reasonably decode with any charset. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-dev

Re: Transforming django-admin.py to a shell script

On 1 March 2013 22:38, Alon Nisser wrote: > at least from my windows exprience with Django (yes, I know this isn't a > common use case, but still) the current django-admin.py and manage.py do > need python preface to run right (while inside a virtualenv) I'm not 100% sure

Re: Triaging: Close as needsinfo

;needsinfo" is almost identical to "cannot reproduce" (aka "worksforme") and I can't think of a reason to keep such a bug open. Of course, there are people who will take everything personal. Even if it's getting your ticket closed by a stranger on a public bug tracker. -- Łukas

Re: Perception of attitude in tickets

system/tracker I sometimes see: -1 votes (setting WONTFIX is effectively a veto just like -1) without giving conditions for improvement to at least -0. Having a clear path of action (even a one that involves a lot of work) to convince the person vetoing your proposal is always better then just &qu

Re: Remote participation in sprints

On 15 May 2013 20:29, Shai Berger wrote: > On Wednesday 15 May 2013, ptone wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:31:36 AM UTC-7, Daniele Procida wrote: > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013, Shai Berger > > > > > > > >Will there be an effective way to do this

Re: Proposal/Discussion: url and template search using the directory structure of apps within django sites

possible and some major pitfalls. There is no gain in *disallowing* this. Personally I wouldn't use this as it's counter-intuitive and works in exact opposite to Python's import mechanism which by default does an absolute search (since 3.x). Regards, Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because

Re: django.utils.functional.cached_property

a PR for the old one ? -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co

Re: django.test.client: Improper POST requests

. It's not a bug. As per documentation: If you provide content_type (e.g. text/xml for an XML payload), the contents of data will be sent *as-is* in the POST request, using content_type in the HTTP Content-Type header. This means that you're responsible for proper encoding the data parameter i

Re: Model validation incompatibility with existing Django idioms

-- > \X/ /-\ `/ |_ /-\ |\| > Waylan Limberg > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this grou

Re: Model validation incompatibility with existing Django idioms

o the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<django-developers%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> &g

Re: phone2numeric doesn't convert "Q" or "Z"

erring to is here: > > http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/trunk/django/utils/text.py#L158 > > Thanks! > >    - Gabriel -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send emai

Re: Porting Django to Python 3

because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Django developers" group. >> To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >&

Re: Porting Django to Python 3

2to3 already handles most of this stuff, so it's the right way to go. At least now. What I really wanted to say, is that using 2to3 on a 2.6 code that uses (for example) __future__.unicode_literals is more likely to succed. > > -Gul > -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this mes

Re: phone2numeric doesn't convert "Q" or "Z"

r...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.apgwoz.com >> >> -- >> Y

Re: AnonymousUser has_perm/has_module_perms function check authentication backends

lex > > -- > "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your > right to say it." -- Voltaire > "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero > "Code can always be simpler than you think, but never as simple as you > want" -- M

Re: TimeField for duration

Hi, if i'm wrong, please ignore this post ;) 2010/1/21 Jerome Leclanche : > A decimal backend was a lot worse than a bigint backend on that matter > (slower, made a lot less sense as well). > > Keep in mind, TIME fields are for storing time, not for storing > durations. For

Re: TimeField for duration

mns.""" After seeing all this mess, i'm +1 on using BigIntField. Good work. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.c

Re: possible bug in count() in many_to_many relations?

nt() function have to return an integer value without > any exceptions. I disagree. If you're standing in an empty room and someone asks you "How many apples inside the yellow basket do you see?", you anwser "What basket, there is nothing here!", not 0. Regards, Łuka

Re: Proposal: {% include_partial %} template tag

the include and restore foo, bar to old values (if any). Using a clean context instead is a bit non-obvious to me. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-devel

Re: Proposal: {% include_partial %} template tag

p://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7817 I'm willing to improve the existing patch, so I assigned it to myself. The ticket is marked as DDN, so I guess this thread is a request to accept it. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dja

Re: including unittest2 in 1.3

nner provide a class which will be then extended by django.test.TestCase. Just thinking aloud. Generally, +10 for doing this. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email

Re: Class based generic views in 1.3?

quot;environment" is in method parameters or request (is this right?). Anyway, I think this discussion in on a wrong track. From a Django user POV, I really don't care how it's implemented. I'm far more concerned with the API that generic views will provide. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received

Re: Suggestion of exception Http301 add as new feature

in case of invalid(valid?) data ? Can you give a more complete example ? -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from thi

Re: Suggestion of exception Http301 add as new feature

y want to return to the user. Relevant ticket: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5515. Also, it's not really documented anywhere and because it's outside of http module, it's hard to find on your own. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: Suggestion of exception Http301 add as new feature

the PermissionDenied handler) get is not very useful to the end user. Showing a big "Permission Denied" with nothing else on the screen makes my users feel like they broken something. Without an option to customize the response content, it's not very useful (which is the point of ticket #5

Ticket #7817: Extending "with" and "include" tags.

Hi, I was wondering if I could get some feedback on this ticket. It was recently briefly discussed here: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/fb8a4a0eb4e1d35e. It has a patch with tests and probably not-so-good docs, but still needs a decision. I'll gladly

Re: #717 (If-Modified-Since checked for exact match) should be fixed

On 9 August 2010 22:48, Paul McMillan wrote: > I agree with the person who closed the ticket again, since this should > have been discussed on the mailing list prior to re-opening it. That would be me ;) > > That said, I'm strongly +1 on this issue. I've had to write >

Tests fail without Docutils

Hi, Since revision 13588, tests fail on trunk without Docutils installed. This was also reported by Paul: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/14123 and currently makes all the buildbots on Hudson fail, so I would like to bring your attention to it Regards, Łukasz Rekucki -- You received

Re: Feature request - extend multiple templates

A_withB:: {% extends "A" %} {% include "B" %} If yes, then I would support this, because it makes templates more maintainable. You avoid both the include and "A_withB" type templates. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are su

Re: #717 (If-Modified-Since checked for exact match) should be fixed

ut it wasn't clear to me if you meant the spider-bot that indexes your page. The main issue here is that parsing the date is probably much slower then a simple compare. We don't want to trade speed for no real-life gain. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed t

Re: #6735 -- Class based generic views: call for comment

kwargs): return type(view_cls.__name__, (view_cls,), kwargs) # in urls.py: (r'^somepath', with_args(MyView, option=False)), # or even (r'^somepath', MyView.with(option=False)), -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &qu

Re: #6735 -- Class based generic views: call for comment

On 2 October 2010 12:32, Russell Keith-Magee <russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > 2010/10/2 Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com>: >> On 2 October 2010 10:34, Russell Keith-Magee <russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: >>> >>> Another option wou

Re: #6735 -- Class based generic views: call for comment

On 3 October 2010 04:44, Russell Keith-Magee <russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: > 2010/10/3 Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com>: >> On 2 October 2010 12:32, Russell Keith-Magee <russ...@keith-magee.com> wrote: >>> 2010/10/2 Łukasz Rekucki <lreku...@gmail.com&

Re: #6735 -- Class based generic views: call for comment

likely to do. +1 on having a compare table between other frameworks. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe f

Re: be localflavor Belgium

-1_3-release-schedule/ -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubs

Re: #6735 -- Class based generic views: call for comment

yes this is the best solution raised so far. > The only problem is decorators: You can't just simply apply login_required() to the class or the dispatch() method. Otherwise, I like this approach. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Djang

Re: #6735 -- Class based generic views: call for comment

l to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. > > -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You receiv

Re: #6735 -- Class based generic views: call for comment

o_template Use a TemplateView with get_response() overriden. The patch on the ticket adds a response class as a parameter. Should we add a similar to TemplateView ? #13953: Generic CRUD views: support for callable in post_ACTION_redirect There are no post_ACTION_redirect parameters anymore, can

Problems with logging and Python 2.4

in Python 2.4[1]. Possible solutions I can see right now: * revert the logging patch (that would be quite bad) * try to do some ugly monkey patching to the logging module * drop Python 2.4 support Opinions ? [1]: http://docs.python.org/library/logging.html#logging.debug -- Łukasz Rekuck

Re: password is None in check_password

implify a bit create_user() > by just calling set_password() for all cases. No need to test password > inside this function anymore. > > - basic.py tests are now unittests and not doctests Good work :) -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Congratulations!

I just noticed we have 2 new Core Developers: Alex Gaynor and Andrew Godwin and a new Admin Specialist Simon Meers. Just wanted to say: Congratulations guys and keep up the good work! :) -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "D

Re: #6375 -- Class Based Views: Opinions on commit plan

On 14 October 2010 18:19, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > The following things are still needed: > >  * An audit of create/update views. >  * An audit of date views. I was planning on hacking onto this on today/tomorrow. Also see below. >  * Documentation, including >    

Re: #6375 -- Class Based Views: Opinions on commit plan

ttp://blip.tv/file/4109272 [2]: http://blip.tv/file/4108781 [3]: http://bitbucket.org/freakboy3742/django -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop

Re: #6375 -- Class Based Views: Opinions on commit plan

is on a per-view basis with just a mixin. I could catch Http404 exception, but it won't trigger middleware handling as it normally does. Any suggestions ? -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To pos

Re: #6375 -- Class Based Views: Opinions on commit plan

s thread, I proposed a similar thing ;) but instead of a whole descriptor, you can just subclass the classmethod decorator: class classonlymethod(classmethod): def __get__(self, instance, owner): if instance is not None: raise AttributeError("This method is availble

Re: #6375 -- Class Based Views: Opinions on commit plan

se, but i'm kinda half asleep at 3 am. -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-de

Re: #6375 -- Class Based Views: Opinions on commit plan

l work done this time. My other targets would be popular 3rd party applications. If you know of any that have some really complicated views, I think trying to rewrite them to CBV would be a good test of the API, so send me a link :) -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are sub

Re: #6375 -- Class Based Views: Opinions on commit plan

at would > lend itself to subclassing. > > Plus, some preliminary work now might provide a good base when we *do* > work out what changes need to be made to auth views. > Yes, this is mostly an academic exercise, so I'll take a look at contrib.comments too. -- Łukasz Rekucki

Re: Feature proposal: escape hatch for colliding template syntax in django templates

so add something like a "boundary" argument just in case someone will want to escape "{% endverbatim %}": {% verbatim boundary="my_random_string" %}{% endverbatim %}{% endverbatim_my_random_string %} -- Łukasz Rekucki -- You received this message because you are

Re: new class based views

e that practice, > but that pattern might be hard to encourage since class-decoration is > less obvious (and certainly much less well established in the Django > code base) than method decoration. OTOH, it'a annoying to have to write an dispatch() method with a super inside (which effectively doe

Re: new class based views

t; To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. > > -

  1   2   >