Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

Thanks Carlos. Folks - Please review the document and post your feedback. https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt At IETF100, we polled the WG feedback for adopting this document and there was consensus for adopting this document. However, we chose not to adopt the

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-08.txt

st some volunteers in the WG to >take a look (even a first quick one) to provide some feedback about >whether we are on the right track or not. It'd be really ideal if we >could have some discussion before the f2f in London, so we could try to >close/decide on open issues by the London

[DMM] WGLC #3 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-13

Folks: The following message commences a three week WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-13. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

Please review and post your comments. Chairs will draft a response for WG review. Sri On 4/11/18, 11:16 AM, "Liaison Statement Management Tool" wrote: >Title: CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC >Submission Date: 2018-04-11 >URL of the IETF Web page:

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01. Dapeng & Sri > >> 2018/03/28 6:25、Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgund...@cisco.com>のメール: >> >> Folks: >> >> During IETF 99 and IETF 100 we polled the room for their interest in >>taking up draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

rashmid.akhav...@huawei.com> wrote: >Hi Sri, > >Any idea what the plan is once we pass this information to CT4? > >Arashmid > >> -Original Message- >> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >> (sgundave) >> Sent: 12

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

timized-mobile-user-plane >and see if CT4 has comments. We are working on a revision of the document >based on the >comments/feedback received at IETF #101. > >Kalyani > >-Original Message- >From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

us. They listed a few dates there. The >final deadline is I guess July 2018. >Are we targeting anything earlier? > >Arashmid > >> -Original Message- >> From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] >> Sent: 13 April 2018 12:47 >> To: A

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

ITU which is also working on NG protocols as >pointed out by some folks at IETF #101. Each SDO >can make use of that information as needed. > >Kalyani > >-Original Message- >From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >(sgundave) >S

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

ed to steer the data-path for the session in N3 and N9. > >Does anyone observe any other points? > >Best regards, >--satoru > > >> 2018/04/14 8:05、Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgund...@cisco.com>のメール: >> >> Hi Arashmid, >> >> >> I am not s

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on User Plane Protocol in 5GC"

to:kalyani.bogin...@verizonwireless.com] >> Sent: 16 April 2018 11:26 >> To: Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhav...@huawei.com>; Sri Gundavelli >> (sgundave) <sgund...@cisco.com>; dmm@ietf.org >> Subject: RE: New Liaison Statement, "CP-173160: New Study Item on

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

ment? (resists re-connection) > >Alex > > >Le 26/03/2018 à 07:14, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) a écrit : >> Alex: >> >> This is a good point. Yes, there is DHCPv6 prefix delegation support in >> 3GPP architecture for supporting mobile router use-cases. This is >>

[DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

Folks: During IETF 99 and IETF 100 we polled the room for their interest in taking up draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif- as a DMM working group document. In both those occasions there was good amount of support for taking up this work.. The chairs would like to confirm the same over the mailing

Re: [DMM] IETF101 DMM WG Meeting Notes #1

rk into >vendor lock-in. It's almost always better to stick with open standards >from day one even in closed systems. > >Tom > >> >> But the best course still would be to have this documented clearly and >>if possible do an update to RFC8200 @ 6man as pointed below b

Re: [DMM] IETF101 DMM WG Meeting Notes #1

For untrusted access (Ex: 3GPP access over untrusted Wi-Fi), protocols like IKEv2-IPsec/MIPv6-UDP (client based solutions) are possible candidates; I agree with Charlie on that. I realize there is work in progress in 5G specs on these interfaces, but I do not see many new options there. Sri

Re: [DMM] IETF101 DMM WG Meeting Notes #1

On 3/26/18, 5:16 PM, "Tom Herbert" wrote: >> With regards to SR encapsulation: "this is using IP-in-IP as default. >> Why not using UDP encapsulation?" > I am really hoping we will be able to apply SRH insertion without the need for IP encapsulation. At least for mobile

Re: [DMM] draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-00

similar functions when you see them individually. Sri On 3/23/18, 3:36 AM, "Tom Herbert" <t...@quantonium.net> wrote: >On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:53 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) ><sgund...@cisco.com> wrote: >> >> ILA-NAT-GW, or Locator-Rewrite Func

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

Alex: This is a good point. Yes, there is DHCPv6 prefix delegation support in 3GPP architecture for supporting mobile router use-cases. This is essentially for delegating prefixes for the networks attached to the UE. This was introduced in Rel-10 by cisco. I have not followed the recent SA2

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

d consideration in next version -02 before London I would recommend to have this call on the new -02 version. Would this be possible to provide soon? Other opinions? Thanks! Best Regards Dirk From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Mittwoch, 28. März

[DMM] IETF101 DMM Slides

Folks: Here is the link to the presentation material for the DMM Meeting at IETF101: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/session/dmm Please review. Thanks Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Re: [DMM] [E] Re: draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-00

> [KB] I will let Sri answer this. Nothing specific to MFA draft, but I will make a general comment. If there is consensus to adopt draft-bogineni as a WG document, and if this work becomes part of the WG charter, I would think the document should include all IETF proposals under discussion

Re: [DMM] draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-00

But, in any case, NAT is not such a bad word, its just that it pushed IPv6 deployments out by 20 years. Sri On 3/20/18, 4:37 AM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <dmm-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of sgund...@cisco.com> wrote: >Tom: > >> ILA is not NAT!

Re: [DMM] draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-00

Tom: > ILA is not NAT! :-) As seen from the end point, I agree ILA is not NAT. But, that the function that is needed at two places where you do translation of the addresses from SIR to LOCATOR, or LOCATOR to SIR is a NAT function, and you have a mapping state similar to NAT state. That¹s a NAT

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-14.txt

Authors: This draft is under WGLC. We were not expecting you guys to post an update during LC period. Please let the WG know about the changes in version -18. WG: Please post WGLC comments on version 13 and not on -14. Thanks Sri On 3/19/18, 7:21 AM, "dmm on behalf of

[DMM] IETF101 DMM WG Meeting Minutes #2

This is the notes from Lyle. Please review and make any corrections. Thank you Lyle. http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-101-dmm?useMonospaceFont=true ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

Yes, in the LS response that we sent to 3GPP on 2/16, we did cite the below work. There are many proposals on this including: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-feng-dmm-ra-prefixtype-01.txt https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-08.txt Also, some proposals from the

[DMM] IETF101 DMM WG Meeting Notes #1

se find my notes attached (they are drafty and I couldn't get some >things). Hope they help. > >Thanks, > >Carlos > >On Wed, 2018-03-21 at 09:19 +, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote: >> - Agenda bashing - Active DMM WG documents Chairs update on the status of the d

Re: [DMM] IETF101 - Call for agenda items

Folks - This is the Agenda for the DMM Working Group meeting at IETF101. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-101-dmm/ Thanks Dapeng & Sri > ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Re: [DMM] RE : [5gangip] 3GPP Liaison Statement on user plane protocol study

Thank you Lionel. We will provide the LS response with the status on the DMM work items and any clarifying questions. Thanks! Sri From: dmm > on behalf of "lionel.mor...@orange.com"

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-08.txt

Hi Carlos/Anthony/Authors, Thanks for the updates. Please summarize the changes that went into -08 version, and also let the WG know on the open issues. Sri On 3/2/18, 10:15 AM, "dmm on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: >

Re: [DMM] IETF101 - Call for agenda items

SRv6 Mobile User Plane draft. > >Cheers, >--satoru > >> 2018/03/06 1:50、Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgund...@cisco.com>のメール: >> >> Folks - This is the Agenda for the DMM Working Group meeting at IETF101. >> >> ht

Re: [DMM] IETF101 - Call for agenda items

DMM >Deployment Models draft. > > >Regards, >Seil Jeon > > >-Original Message- >From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >(sgundave) >Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 1:07 PM >To: Satoru Matsushima; dmm@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [DMM] IETF101 -

Re: [DMM] IETF101 - Call for agenda items

Jeon > > >-Original Message- >From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli >(sgundave) >Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 1:07 PM >To: Satoru Matsushima; dmm@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [DMM] IETF101 - Call for agenda items > >Revised … > >http

[DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

Folks: During IETF 102 and 103, the authors of the document, draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis.txt have provided the overview of this document. The chairs felt there is good amount of work that went into the document and the analysis has value. The document quality is very high. There was also

Re: [DMM] draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif ready for WGLC in my opinion

Great feedback. This really helps. We want to publish quality documents, unless we hear that from the WG, we cannot move forward. We absolutely need substantial review feedback, and not a mere "looks good" comment. Good to hear that draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif is in a good shape. We will issue

Re: [DMM] Slides - DMM: IETF 103

WG: You can access the DMM WG presentation slides at the below link. Presenters - Please check your slides and let us know if you find any errors. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/session/dmm On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 12:49 PM Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) mailto:sgund...@cisco.com

[DMM] IETF 103 - Meeting Minutes

Thank you Satoru-san and Pablo. Please review and let us know if there are any corrections required. http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-103-dmm?useMonospaceFont=true ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org

[DMM] IETF103 - Call for agenda items

Folks: The DMM working group is planning to meet in Bangkok, on Thursday, Nov 8th, 2018, for a 2.5 hour session (subject to change). The IETF 103 Preliminary Agenda has been posted and you can see it at, https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/agenda.html If you need a presentation slot,

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

and Sri > > > >> >>> 2018/12/14 15:14、Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) のメール: >>> >>> Folks – Sorry for the delay on this. Given the number of support votes >>>for the company I am affiliated with, I thought it would be best for my >>>co-chair D

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11

in conjunction with the dmm document. The notion of a "home network" need not be preserved, and instead we have scalable de-aggregation. Please have a look (as I did for the dmm doc) and post comments or questions. Thanks - Fred From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavel

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

l-15. There was no need for that!) > >It looks not accurate view of the latest discussion in 3GPP CT4. CT4 >agreed not to introduce any NEW identifiers to indicate network slice for >5GC and its transport. Existing identifiers can be expected for that >purpose in user plane. &

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

Folks - Sorry for the delay on this. Given the number of support votes for the company I am affiliated with, I thought it would be best for my co-chair Dapeng reviews this feedback, and in consultation with the AD, makes the decision on this. We will close it soon. Sri From: Sri Gundavelli

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

Thanks for all the feedback. The adoption call is now closed. We will review the feedback and decide on the next steps. Sri From: dmm mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Sri Gundavelli mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 10:42 AM To:

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

Gentle reminder. The below adoption call will close next week, the 4th of December, 2018. Please provide your feedback. Sri From: dmm mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Sri Gundavelli mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 at 4:34 PM To:

[DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03

Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11

Thanks for all the feedback. Authors: Please post a revised document, addressing all the comments that you have received. Sri From: Sri Gundavelli mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM To: "dmm@ietf.org" mailto:dmm@ietf.org>> Subject:

Re: [DMM] IETF104 DMM WG meeting minutes

ted resources/slice. A more extensive Q in writing :) Thanks, marco From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Mittwoch, 27. März 2019 06:02 To: dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> Subject: [DMM] IETF104 DMM WG meeting minutes Thank you Miya-san. Fo

[DMM] IETF104 DMM WG meeting minutes

Thank you Miya-san. Folks - Please review the below meeting minutes, and propose any corrections. https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/notes-ietf-104-dmm?useMonospaceFont=true Sri From: "Miya Kohno (mkohno)" Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 11:41 AM To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)&qu

Re: [DMM] IETF104 - Call for agenda items

Thanks for sending the requests for presentation slots. We will finalize the agenda and post it next week. Sri On 2/14/19, 8:05 PM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" wrote: >Folks: > >If you need a presentation slot for the next IETF-104 meeting in Prague, >pl

[DMM] IETF104 Agenda

Agenda is now posted. Please check and let us know if we are missing any requests. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-104-dmm/ > ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

[DMM] FW: IPR Disclosure InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc. s Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif

Folks - Please checkout this IPR declaration from InterDigital. Sri On 3/18/19, 9:44 AM, "dmm on behalf of IETF Secretariat" wrote: >Dear Carlos J. Bernardos, Antonio de la Oliva, Fabio Giust, Juan-Carlos >Zúñiga, Alain Mourad: > > >An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft

[DMM] IETF104 - Call for agenda items

Folks: If you need a presentation slot for the next IETF-104 meeting in Prague, please send your request to the chairs (as a response to this email) with the following information. The deadline for presentation slots is the 28th of Feb, 2019. >Topic Name: >Presenter Name: >Time: >Draft

Re: [DMM] IETF105 - Call for agenda items

aft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-05 > >Best regards, >--satoru > >2019/07/08 22:41、Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) のメール: > >> Gentle reminder. Please send your requests by 11th of July. >> >> >> Sri >> >> >> On 6/30/19, 10:02 AM, "dmm

Re: [DMM] IETF105 - Call for agenda items

Gentle reminder. Please send your requests by 11th of July. Sri On 6/30/19, 10:02 AM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" wrote: >Folks: > >We are planning to have a f2f DMM WG meeting at IETF-105. It is currently >scheduled for Wednesday, 24 July 2019, Morni

Re: [DMM] Document Action: 'On Demand Mobility Management' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-18.txt)

Congrats Danny, Seil and all. Thanks for all your efforts. Sri On 8/6/19, 1:55 PM, "The IESG" wrote: >The IESG has approved the following document: >- 'On Demand Mobility Management' > (draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-18.txt) as Informational RFC > >This document is the product of the

[DMM] IETF 105: DMM Working Group Meeting - Agenda

Please see the agenda for the DMM Working group meeting. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/agenda-105-dmm-00 Presenters: Please send your slides by Sunday 9 PM EDT. Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org

Re: [DMM] New chair addition for dmm

Welcome Satoru-san. This is great news. Looking forward to working with you. Sri Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 24, 2019, at 9:31 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > > Hi all, > I would like to announce the appointment of Satoru Matsushima as a new > co-chair for the dmm working group. Sri and

[DMM] IETF 105: DMM Meeting Minutes

Thanks to David I Allan & John Kaippallimalil for the excellent note capture. Please let us know if we need to make any corrections. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/minutes-105-dmm-00 Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org

[DMM] IETF105 - Call for agenda items

Folks: We are planning to have a f2f DMM WG meeting at IETF-105. It is currently scheduled for Wednesday, 24 July 2019, Morning Session I 1000-1200. If you have any topics to present, please send your request to the chairs (as a response to this email) with the following information. >>Topic

Re: [DMM] IETF106 - Call for Agenda Items

Agenda is now posted. Please review. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-106-dmm/ Presenters: Please send your slides by Sunday, 17th Nov, 6PM SGT. Satoru & Sri From: dmm mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Satoru Matsushima mailto:satoru.matsush...@gmail.com>> Date: Monday,

[DMM] FW: IPR Statement RE: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-07

Authors/WG: Please review this IPR disclosure, and provide your feedback on the mailer. Sri On 11/18/19, 12:10 AM, "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" wrote: Dear chairs, There has been an IPR disclosure for this draft. This IPR has not been reflected in the draft tracker. Please

[DMM] Fwd: Minutes for DMM at IETF 106

Thank you David. Very much appreciated. WG: Please review and provide any edits. Sri Begin forwarded message: From: David Allan I mailto:david.i.al...@ericsson.com>> Date: November 20, 2019 at 10:13:35 AM GMT+8 To: "dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>" mailto:dmm@ietf.org

Re: [DMM] IETF106 - Call for Agenda Items

Thanks Hannu for the information. Working group needs to review this input. Also, I agree with you that the document may have to reflect the SDO’s current view on this work. Sri On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 6:04 AM Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo) mailto:hannu.fli...@nokia-bell-labs.com>>

[DMM] IETF 107 - DMM Working Group Session Cancellation

Dear All, Due to some travel restrictions that in are place from my employer, and as well from Satoru’s employer, we had to cancel our travel to Vancouver. In discussions with our AD, we have jointly decided to cancel the DMM Working Group meeting for IETF107. Apologies for the late

Re: [DMM] New Version Notification for draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-07.txt

WG – Please provide your inputs on this document. Authors have presented this earlier and like to get some feedback. Sri From: dmm on behalf of Uma Chunduri Date: Friday, October 16, 2020 at 11:42 AM To: dmm Cc: "Luis M. Contreras" , Praveen Muley , Jeff Tantsura , Richard Li , Sridhar

Re: [DMM] RFC 8885 on Proxy Mobile IPv6 Extensions for Distributed Mobility Management

Nice! Congrats to all the authors and the WG. Sri On 10/9/20, 3:07 PM, "dmm on behalf of rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org" wrote: A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8885 Title: Proxy Mobile IPv6 Extensions for

[DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

Folks - We have the meeting scheduled for Nov 17th. Please send any topics that you want to present. Sri On 10/23/20, 2:16 PM, ""IETF Secretariat"" wrote: Dear Sri Gundavelli, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session

Re: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

Thanks Pablo for taking capturing the meeting minutes. https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-109-dmm# WG - Please review Sri From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Friday, November 13, 2020 at 7:00 AM To: dmm Subject: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been

Re: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

Hi Uma, Thanks! Sure, we will initiate the adoption call. Sri From: dmm on behalf of Uma Chunduri Date: Sunday, December 20, 2020 at 12:00 PM To: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109 Dear Chai

Re: [DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

i, We would like to ask a 10 mins slot to update the WG for the to be published draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility (08 version - would be done on 11/02). The changes are mostly to address the recent comments received in the list. -- Uma C. On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 3:49 PM Sri Gundavelli (sgund

[DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 109

Please review the agenda for IETF 109. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/agenda-109-dmm-00.txt Satoru & Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

[DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

Folks: The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G, have presented the proposal and the need for standardization in multiple IETF WG meetings. There have been good amount of discussions in the mailers and there is some level of interest for the work from the community.

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

Thank you all. This adoption call is now closed. We will review the feedback. * Chairs From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 10:56 AM To: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a W

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

my support as co-author (I have been off for some days, just realized now the closure of the poll) In any case I agree on and remark the need of making documents consistent across WGs. Best regards Luis El mié, 20 ene 2021 a las 19:43, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) (mailto:40cisco@dmar

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

decide to do that work here, or in some other group and that’s based on AD/Chair inputs and on the review expertise that is needed for this work completion. -Chairs From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM To: dmm Sub

Re: [DMM] Additional questions/comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13

Authors: Can you please summarize the discussions and identify the open issues, or areas of non-agreement that have come up as part of this WGCLC Thanks Sri ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

The WGLC is now closed. Thanks for all the feedback. We believe, there is general consensus to move the document forward. There were also few concerns expressed and that we will discuss with our AD, and make sure they are reflected in the shepherd notes. Thanks for all the feedback. Authors:

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document

the feedback. Sri From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 10:43 AM To: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document Thank you all. This adoption call is now closed. We will review th

Re: [DMM] Call for Agenda: IETF110 DMM

Hi Miya, Yes, we need some review feedback, before we can initiate any adoption call. Please present this in the WG meeting and we can ask some folks to sign-up for reviews. All – Please review and post your feedback on the WG mailer. Sri From: Miya Kohno Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2021

[DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

Working Group: As we discussed in the last IETF meeting, we are issuing WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. I am very pleased with the quality of this document. The authors have

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

protocols, we (the IETF) have objected. And for good reasons. Therefore, we owe other standards bodies the same respect. We should not produce standards (this is a standards track document) that modify other bodies architectures. Yours, Joel On 4/7/2021 1:35 PM, Sri

[DMM] IPR poll on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

all authors of the document. The DMM list is added in CC for the sake of transparency. Thanks Sri From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 at 10:35 AM To: "dmm@ietf.org" Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-upla

[DMM] Agenda Topics

WG: If you have any topics to present, please send us a note. Currently, we have three agenda topics, and can take few more. Sri On 10/15/21, 3:34 PM, ""IETF Secretariat"" wrote: Dear Sri Gundavelli, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the

Re: [DMM] Comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13

Working Group - Thank you for all the feedback and the lively discussions on this LC. Thank you for that. At the same time, we do want to structure these discussions, as it is all over the place. Few points: 1. Any comments on the technical approach, clarifications and things which are in

[DMM] Second WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane

Folks: We have issued a WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane in April of last year. Based on the feedback and the comments from the WG, we chose to hold the document so the authors can resolve the identified issues from that LC. The authors have worked with the reviewers and have revised

Re: [DMM] Second WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane

and review this feedback carefully and work out the proposed changes, if any. Thanks for all the feedback. Authors – Please post a revised document with any additional changes/edits/ based on the LC feedback. Sri From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Frida

Re: [DMM] Is IPv6 UDP checksum deployment impact an input to 3GPP?

Hi Bechet, Yes. This thread was initiated on my behalf. I will be the sole responsible chair driving the discussions on this thread. Regards Sri From: dmm on behalf of Behcet Sarikaya Reply-To: "sarik...@ieee.org" Date: Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 9:25 AM To: Satoru Matsushima Cc: dmm

[DMM] WG Meeting - Agenda Topics

If you have any topics to present, please send us a note. Sri On 7/1/22, 2:15 PM, ""IETF Secretariat"" wrote: Dear Sri Gundavelli, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request.

[DMM] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gundavelli-dmm-device-identifier-00.txt

Appreciate any feedback on this draft. Sri On 7/11/22, 2:40 PM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: A new version of I-D, draft-gundavelli-dmm-device-identifier-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Sri Gundavelli and posted to the IETF repository. Name:

Re: [DMM] WG Meeting - Agenda Topics

This is what we are tracking. Please let us know if we missed any requests. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-114-dmm/ On 7/10/22, 8:15 PM, "dmm on behalf of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" wrote: If you have any topics to present, please send us a note. Sri

Re: [DMM] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Eric, Many thanks for your review. I am responding to one of your DISCUSS comments, which is your observations on the Shepherd note. The initial note, based on the established consensus at that time, was to keep the document as a Proposed Standard. Shepherd note included the justification for

[DMM] Document Status Change - draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-21

Dear DMM WG Members: A quick update on the status of this document. Based on the feedback resulting from IETF Last Call, 3GPP-IETF Coordination team, 3GPP CT Chair and few others, we have decided to move this document (SRv6 for Mobile User Plane - draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane) on

[DMM] FW: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23.txt

Thank you Pablo and authors for posting the new revision with the suggested changes. I will let our AD know about the new version. Regards Sri On 12/8/22, 8:07 AM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: A new version (-23) has been submitted for draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane:

Re: [DMM] Media Header Extensions for Wireless Networks

Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" Subject: Re: Media Header Extensions for Wireless Networks Hi Sri in-line Well here and hope you are too – been too long David From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Date: Tuesday, 15 November 2022 at 05:22 To: Lake, David (PG/R - Comp Sci & Elec Eng) Cc

Re: [DMM] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

point addressed. I.e., the remaining points are still unaddressed and must be resolved (they are easy to resolve anyway). Regards -éric On 10/01/2023, 19:53, "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" mailto:sgund...@cisco.com> <mailto:sgund...@cisco.com <mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>>>

Re: [DMM] Media Header Extensions for Wireless Networks

Hi David, Hope you are doing well! Thank you for your feedback. Please see inline From: David Lake Date: Monday, November 14, 2022 at 1:22 AM To: Sri Gundavelli Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" Subject: Media Header Extensions for Wireless Networks Hi Sri Thank you for the very interesting presentation

[DMM] FW: dmm - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 116

Folks - If you have any topics to present, please send a request to the chairs with the topic name and other details. Thanks Sri On 3/3/23, 3:06 PM, ""IETF Secretariat"" mailto:age...@ietf.org>> wrote: Dear Sri Gundavelli, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.

Re: [DMM] Emergency 911 Services over Wi-Fi

Hi David, Thanks a lot for the feedback. I agree with the two key problems you have identified. It is indeed about network selection; it is about temporary access and also about using emergency service configuration for use with the default dialer. * Network attachment. The solution

Re: [DMM] [IANA #1303225] [Errata Verified] RFC5555 (3463)

Hi Sabrina, We will review this and get back to you. Thanks Sri On 2/16/24, 4:42 PM, "dmm on behalf of Sabrina Tanamal via RT" mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of iana-mat...@iana.org > wrote: Hi Eric, all, (resending this message) Should this errata

Re: [DMM] DMM WG Adoption Poll (1) for "Architecture Discussion on SRv6 Mobile User plane" - draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-07

Thank you for all the feedback. Based on the responses, we believe there is interest from the working for taking up this work. We did not see any strong objections, or concerns for taking up this work. We will therefore adopt draft-kohno-dmm-srv6mob-arch-07 as the baseline document. We the

<    1   2   3   4   >