--
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Courtney Judd
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 12:44
To: Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx4win] wish list!
Afternoon All! here is a wish list for DX4WIN that I would like to see
implemented in a new version if
On number 3, you must have an issue with something in your
setup/implementation. It already does what you describe you WANT it to do.
IE, whatever size I have it set to, that's the size it opens in every time.
I just went and resized it, closed it, opened it.over and over
againtrying every
4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Courtney Judd
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 12:44
To: Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx4win] wish list!
Afternoon All! here is a wish list for DX4WIN that I would like to see
implemented in a new version if possi
Afternoon All! here is a wish list for DX4WIN that I would like to see
implemented in a new version if possible! I am using version 9.0.9.1259
and have close to 150K contacts stored in it. I absolutely love this
program and support it and Paul for sure. Here are 3 improvements that
would be eas
DX4WIN Wish List
PSK63 support (not a great PSK user, but PSK31 is just too slow).
Thank you Paul
73
Steve
GW4BLE
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
My suggestion of how I like to log receive, transceive and transmit
frequencies has evolved over time, primarily in the age before
computer logging, when I wrote QSL cards out by hand and used
frequency rather than band.
Again, you are logging improperly. It may not matter to you as an
Amateu
I am on the air since 1991.
I am using dx4win since december 1997 (release 1.07 if i remember well).
I think that this software is just perfect.
My wish list is limited to an improvement of CAT.
I know that is a very hard job but in my opinion is the only part that can be
discussed.
I saw easy log
Maybe I am silly because I reply to the same question a number of years
without response...
Anyway... I like to add to K0CF list, omnirig support.
This adds flexibility and solves a number of problems as
1. support for new radios (dx4win is also back on this),
2. co-operation with pst rotator (mu
o: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] DX4Win wish list (In addition to xmmt.ocx)
With my previous post, I was hoping to produce a discussion of improvements
needed in DX4Win, and we have a reasonable start. Some comments for a couple of
the replies:
To Joe, W4TV, I respectfully disagree. In 5
With my previous post, I was hoping to produce
a discussion of improvements needed in DX4Win,
and we have a reasonable start. Some comments
for a couple of the replies:
To Joe, W4TV, I respectfully disagree. In 54
plus years of hamming I have found things that
work for me. My suggestion of how I l
F9 to start logging - why?
73! Mike R3BM
-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of K0CF
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 8:29 PM
To: DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx4win] DX4Win wish list (In addition to xmmt.ocx)
DX4W
know who is where
without clogging up the Packet Network with some spots that no
one else might care about.
TNX/73, Bob K8BL
From: K0CF
To: DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 12:28 PM
Subject: [Dx4win] DX4Win wish list (In addition to xmmt.ocx)
DX4Win is certainly due
> Proper logging of split frequency operation.
> The Frequency box should always be the receive
> frequency, i.e. the frequency that the DX is
> transmitting on. The QSX (transmit) frequency
> should be logged in a field separate from the
> current Frequency box only if operating split.
> (It is
DX4Win is certainly due a "refresh". My wish
list (in addition to xmmt.ocx support) for
the next release includes the following:
QRZ.com XML data subscription support in the
F3 Callsign/Mgr Lookup window. This is LONG
OVERDUE! Having to use a callbook CD is so
archaic and annoying, since they are
g.
-Original Message-
From: Jim - N4ST [mailto:newsgr...@jimpricejr.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 2:10 PM
To: k7...@cox.net; 'Dx4win'
Subject: RE: [Dx4win] Wish list
Alan,
No debate that HRD has a learning curve, because it is very feature rich.
For the particular issu
ted to HRD because of the broad support of
digital modes that are built in.
73,
Jim - N4ST
-Original Message-
From: ALAN ZACK [mailto:k7...@cox.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 15:00
To: 'Jim - N4ST'; 'Dx4win'
Subject: RE: [Dx4win] Wish list
I looked at HRD at the Vi
om: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Jim - N4ST
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 9:32 PM
To: 'Dx4win'
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Wish list
I like the way HRD handles new modes. It has a user editable file that can
be updated as needed and can be mapped to a
] On
Behalf Of Jay Hainline
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 16:31
To: Dx4win
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Wish list
DX4WIN is still lagging way behind on keeping up with the newer digital
modes and the signal reports used. Very poor when it comes to logging
JT65-HF and the signal reports sent/received and
X4WIN Reflector
Gesendet: 21:46 Montag, 29.Juli 2013
Betreff: Re: [Dx4win] Wish list
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Erkki Heikkinen
wrote:
For future releases:
1) Ability to block self spotters.
2) Ability to block non-DX spots inside the same continent (or even
inside the same country
t;CC: DX4WIN Reflector
>Gesendet: 21:46 Montag, 29.Juli 2013
>Betreff: Re: [Dx4win] Wish list
>
>
>On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Erkki Heikkinen
> wrote:
>> For future releases:
>>
>> 1) Ability to block self spotters.
>>
>> 2) Ability to block non-DX
-Original Message-
From: Jørgen Louis Christensen
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 20:24
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Wish list
And fldigi would be very nice to
Vy 73 de 5Q2J, Joe
Den 29-07-2013 22:21, Kostas SV1DPI skrev:
Agree with Jim. Dx4win should leave some duties to other
And fldigi would be very nice to
Vy 73 de 5Q2J, Joe
Den 29-07-2013 22:21, Kostas SV1DPI skrev:
Agree with Jim. Dx4win should leave some duties to other free software
as clusters to ve7cc, rig control to omnirig, lotw to tqsl, erc for
rotators control, jt65 for strange digi, msstv for sstv, dig
Agree with Jim. Dx4win should leave some duties to other free software
as clusters to ve7cc, rig control to omnirig, lotw to tqsl, erc for
rotators control, jt65 for strange digi, msstv for sstv, digipan for
psk, etc. but these programs should be integrated with dx4win as mmtty
already is. What
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Erkki Heikkinen
wrote:
> For future releases:
>
> 1) Ability to block self spotters.
>
> 2) Ability to block non-DX spots inside the same continent (or even
> inside the same country)!
>
> 3) Ability to block bragging spots: tnx, tks, tu, thx
>
> 4) Ability to blo
For future releases:
1) Ability to block self spotters.
2) Ability to block non-DX spots inside the same continent (or even
inside the same country)!
3) Ability to block bragging spots: tnx, tks, tu, thx
4) Ability to block begging spots: pse...
These make more than 80% of spots received today
As stated earlier: I would like to see the ability to see only spots needed
for band Challenge.
In other words, If I have a band that has at least one mode confirmed, I would
not see the Any mode spots for that band. This clutters up the DX Spots
screen. So many of us are interested in the Ch
>
> At 06:20 PM 1/16/2011, ALAN ZACK wrote:
> >
> >I would like to suggest that the QSL DATE slot be changed to QSL DATE
> >SENT
> >and an additional slot be added for QSL DATE RCVD. In that way we can
> track
> >how long it is from when a QSL is sent until a reply is received.
> Sometimes
> >peo
At 06:20 PM 1/16/2011, ALAN ZACK wrote:
>
>I would like to suggest that the QSL DATE slot be changed to QSL DATE SENT
>and an additional slot be added for QSL DATE RCVD. In that way we can track
>how long it is from when a QSL is sent until a reply is received. Sometimes
>people will ask on th
I have searched the DX4WIN home page for a wish list but didn't find one.
I have two suggestions for consideration on future updates.
1. In the main logging window in the QSL area there are presently the
following slots: LABEL, QSL DATE, CNFM, and METHOD.
I would like to suggest that the QSL
gt;> Verzonden: donderdag 7 januari 2010 11:06
>> Aan: ON4AOI
>> CC: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
>> Onderwerp: Re: [Dx4win] Wish List
>>
>> Well I thought the idea of making a hardware switch to control more
>> than
>> 2 radios was a great idea... how I leav
:06
> Aan: ON4AOI
> CC: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
> Onderwerp: Re: [Dx4win] Wish List
>
> Well I thought the idea of making a hardware switch to control more
> than
> 2 radios was a great idea... how I leave up to the experts ;-) I
> suppose
> the ideal solution would be a
; Van: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-
>> boun...@mailman.qth.net] Namens Randy Farmer
>> Verzonden: woensdag 6 januari 2010 4:49
>> Aan: W9RPM; DX4WIN
>> Onderwerp: Re: [Dx4win] Wish List
>>
>>
>>> Hi, I really like the option to choose b
with zener diode)
To switch SO2R hardware.
Guy ON4AOI
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-
> boun...@mailman.qth.net] Namens Randy Farmer
> Verzonden: woensdag 6 januari 2010 4:49
> Aan: W9RPM; DX4WIN
> Onderwerp: Re: [Dx
No this is not necessary.
To those of us with more than 2 radios... often the case when active on
VHF/UHF... it is just necessary to be able to easily select which radio
is Radio 1 or Radio 2 as a start. This is implemented in most
competitive logging programs hot switching more than 2 woul
>Hi, I really like the option to choose between different radios quickly.
>Would it be hard to be able to include more than 2 in the next release? I
>would personally like to see 4. This is especially handy on VHF/UHF with
>different radios, not the all in one. Thanks- John W9RPM
The problem with
I asked for this for ver 8... but apparently it requires a fair bit of
work. Perhaps Paul has it on his todo list...
W9RPM wrote:
> Hi, I really like the option to choose between different radios quickly.
> Would it be hard to be able to include more than 2 in the next release? I
> would person
Hi, I really like the option to choose between different radios quickly.
Would it be hard to be able to include more than 2 in the next release? I
would personally like to see 4. This is especially handy on VHF/UHF with
different radios, not the all in one. Thanks- John W9RPM
EMAIL: j...@w9rpm.c
Thank the gods you are so lucky... and reach for the controls with your
hand Mike ;-)
?? wrote:
> Hi gang!
> I still wonder why DX4WIN has only one port for antenna rotator control? I
> am very disappointed with this . Many of us have more as one tower/rotaror. I
> have 3 towers
rwerp: Re: [Dx4win] wish list for 8.02 or later
>
> Hi gang!
> I still wonder why DX4WIN has only one port for antenna rotator
> control? I am very disappointed with this . Many of us have more as one
> tower/rotaror. I have 3 towers with Yaesu rotators but I can control
>
Hi gang!
I still wonder why DX4WIN has only one port for antenna rotator control? I am
very disappointed with this . Many of us have more as one tower/rotaror. I have
3 towers with Yaesu rotators but I can control only one. What to do with the
rest?
Regards, Mike RL3BM
On 8/28/2009 6:20 AM, Tibor M. Blum - IK2SAI - wrote:
> 1) we can understand that CAT is a very complicated matter. Dx4win do
> that in a very primitive manner. But. now that dx4win has the band map
> should be very interesting to run connected to the radio. Problem is that
> many of us are using
Hi Tibor.
AFIK #2 is being considered... it might take a while... bugs need to be
fixed first.
re #1... I think you should ask Simon to implement that in HRD since his
program would create that requirement with any logging program. (Maybe
he did... did you ask him?) I use multiple virtual port
Ok, i don't know if it is appropriate at this time to make a post like this.
Any way: I would like to ask a pair of things to Paul.
1) we can understand that CAT is a very complicated matter. Dx4win do
that in a very primitive manner. But. now that dx4win has the band map
should be ve
>I think we're missing Randy's point. Users shouldn't have to fix this
>stuff. Some will be able to, some won't.
>
>Perhaps Paul can make two changes:
>
>1. An option to NOT put the LoTW comments in the "Notes for this QSO" field
>
>2. A Multiple QSO operation to remove such comments from an e
I think we're missing Randy's point. Users shouldn't have to fix this
stuff. Some will be able to, some won't.
Perhaps Paul can make two changes:
1. An option to NOT put the LoTW comments in the "Notes for this QSO" field
2. A Multiple QSO operation to remove such comments from an existing l
> -Original Message-
> From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-
> boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Randy Farmer
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 9:17 AM
> To: Mel; Lee Hallin
> Cc: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Wish list, again -- LOT
>Before you download the lotwreport.adi file from ARRL, there is a
>check box (normally UNCHECKED) that allows you to include extra
>information in the downloaded lotwreport.adi file.
Unchecking the detail box suppresses everything except the occurrence
of the QSL.
Actually, I WANT the state, g
>Not really necessary. DX4Win has a very handy feature... export to
>DX4Win format. It creates a text version of the file that can very
>easily be modified with search and replace.
That's the .DXQ file format. In my experience, WordPad (not Notepad)
does a fine job with search and replace with
Not really necessary. DX4Win has a very handy feature... export to
DX4Win format. It creates a text version of the file that can very
easily be modified with search and replace. Don't use notebook... too
slow... but you can download PFE which is easy to use and very fast for
large searches... o
Hi all,
I realize that Randy was wanting the "fix" in the next DX4WIN version; but...
Does anyone else dislike the LOTW: phrase as much as Randy? Let me know
direct (save band-width). If enough people would like it removed, I can write
a program that would remove all, or the non-conflic
This is easily solved, but BEFORE the fact.
Before you download the lotwreport.adi file from ARRL, there is a
check box (normally UNCHECKED) that allows you to include extra
information in the downloaded lotwreport.adi file.
You must be checking that box, because that is what is adding all the
ex
Having just done a major cleanup of a log with around 55K QSOs, many
of them imports from contest logs, I would like to revive the "Wish
List" thread in hopes of influencing the development of future
versions of DX4WIN. Specifically, there is room for major improvement
in how DX4WIN handles dat
Gee.it works just as described if you then CLOSE DX4WIN and re-open
it. Sorry guys!
73 de Terry KK6T
Mel Martin wrote:
> You see CW,RTTY,SSB then the rest sorted alphabetically. Active modes
> followed by inactive modes.
>
>
> Terry wrote:
>> OKlet me make sure I'm doing this right.
You see CW,RTTY,SSB then the rest sorted alphabetically. Active modes
followed by inactive modes.
Terry wrote:
> OKlet me make sure I'm doing this right. Under Preferences >
> Station I have ONLY CW, RTTY & SSB checked. If I am adding a new QSO
> and I'm in the Mode field I still see ALL
OKlet me make sure I'm doing this right. Under Preferences >
Station I have ONLY CW, RTTY & SSB checked. If I am adding a new QSO
and I'm in the Mode field I still see ALL modes (enabled or not) in
alphabetical order.
I'm using version 7.07.02 and if tried it on my Vista machine here at
What version DX4WIN?
The modes that are enabled in your station preferences will be listed
first (in alphabetical order), then the rest of the (unenabled) modes
will be listed next, also in alphabetical order.
I think this has been a feature of Version 7, maybe Version 6 too.
73 - Jim AD1C
On T
Check again... you should see this order: CW, SSB, RTTY, ASCI, ATV, and
so on.
I still think inactive modes should not appear at all... generally D4W
is very good at data entry in off-line mode without using the mouse if
you set up the "disable fields" which just disables tabs to that field
... b
I'm not seeing this behavior. I only have CW, SSB & RTTY enabled and
yet the mode field in the QSO window still shows everything in
alphabetical order. Up-arrow or down-arrow makes no difference.
73 de Terry KK6T
Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> You can work around it, if you use the UP arrow to cha
I had forgotten about this... and I must agree that I'm surprised it
hasn't been addressed yet.
Randy Farmer wrote:
>> Like many of us I chase DXCC and WAZ. ...
>
> I'd be perfectly happy to settle for being able to get an accurate
> DXCC CW report without having to manually filter out all the
Note that PSK31 is the correct mode, PSK isn't even an ADIF mode and the
QSO will be kicked out if you try to sign the log for LoTW.
73 - Jim AD1C
On 3/19/2009 5:28 AM, Mel Martin wrote:
> Make sure that the mode field is enabled. just hit S to select SSB and C
> once or twice to select CW (Clo
Make sure that the mode field is enabled. just hit S to select SSB and C
once or twice to select CW (Clover also starts with C). You work PSK and
RTTY from the mobile? In any case R selects RTTY... P selects lots of
stuff... but if the inactive modes were removed from the dropdown the
situation wou
You can work around it, if you use the UP arrow to change the mode. The
modes that you have enabled in the program are in the list FIRST,
followed by the disabled modes. I realize it's not an ideal solution.
I can see the downside to what you're suggesting, however. Say you try
to log a QSO
I might as well get on the band-wagon. Someone pointed out that it should
not be so difficult to provide the mode for a contact. I do a lot of mobile
work and log on a voice recorder, which I manually log into DXW every few
days. I REALLY would like to be able to use a "C" for CW, "P" for PSK31,
>Like many of us I chase DXCC and WAZ. ...
I'd be perfectly happy to settle for being able to get an accurate
DXCC CW report without having to manually filter out all the pre-1975
QSOs in my log to do so. It's always amazed me that this simple
recognition of the rules of eligibility for one o
2009 3:42 PM
Subject: [Dx4win] Wish list
>I believe that it is possible to have a dx4win 8.0 until Dayton. It's
>usual
> for Paul to update the program close to Dayton. I feel good because
> Paul is
> more interested, writes on the reflector, give replies and listen us
> th
I guess my wish list would be to change the logging for satellite contacts
to something that can be uploaded to LOTW without having to go in and edit
the adif file.
73 Jay
Jay Hainline KA9CFD EN40om
Colchester, IL
__
Dx4win mailin
The way I think D4W is working... that's not going to happen like that.
However, it is possible to have a combined award display where the spot
priority (which determines the color) is determined to be the higher of
the awards you are actively chasing. That way, if you needed Zone 2 on
160M, if
Terry
I absolutely agree...this is REALLY a must..
73
i5nph
Natale
- Original Message -
From: "Terry"
To: "DX4WIN"
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 21:41
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Wish list
> Like many of us I chase DXCC and WAZ. Something I have requested for
Like many of us I chase DXCC and WAZ. Something I have requested for
years is the ability to view DXCC and WAZ opportunities at the same time
in the DX Spots window. I find it very inconvenient to be required to
toggle between DXCC/WAZ/WPX. However I've never taken the time to lay
out how I
: Dick Flanagan
CC: DX4WIN Reflector
Onderwerp: Re: [Dx4win] Wish list
Hi Dick,
I haven't been involved in software for quite as long as you (only
since the mid-70s ... I'm a youngster), but I had a saying that I used
to use along those same lines: "Fast, cheap, good: Pick two&q
Hi Dick,
I haven't been involved in software for quite as long as you (only
since the mid-70s ... I'm a youngster), but I had a saying that I used
to use along those same lines: "Fast, cheap, good: Pick two". Of course,
in a situation like this, with a single developer it's tough to apply
t
PM
To: DX4WIN Reflector
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Wish list
At 07:17 AM 3/18/2009, a lot of people wrote:
>And maybe a blah blah blah
It is truly amazing how many people haven't a clue what is involved
in a typical software development cycle. Everybody wants all this
new stuff designe
At 07:17 AM 3/18/2009, a lot of people wrote:
>And maybe a blah blah blah
It is truly amazing how many people haven't a clue what is involved
in a typical software development cycle. Everybody wants all this
new stuff designed, coded, alpha and beta tested, documented and
released in less tha
David, K2DBK wrote:
> Personally, I would rank this (simpler LoTW updates) as more important.
> I upload more frequently (not in small part due to chasing the Triple
> Play Award, and after getting it, helping out others), sometimes
> multiple times per day. Given that there is an API (more or l
Personally, I would rank this (simpler LoTW updates) as more important.
I upload more frequently (not in small part due to chasing the Triple
Play Award, and after getting it, helping out others), sometimes
multiple times per day. Given that there is an API (more or less) for
using LoTW and a w
It isn't copied Ernie... it is a unique record that maps to the
callsign... and is very useful as it stands... it should be left alone.
BTW, I have the same issue as my log goes back to 1969.
What Paul needs to do is add a new field for name. I'm not sure, with
access to QRZ.Com and such, wheth
I have been reading the posts with great interest, and was 'happy' to see
that the number of groups was going to be increased beyond 256 in the next
update. I had been asking for that since 2005, but re-arranged my log only
six months ago, believing that there was no likelihood of this change being
re 4. I also thing the country database should have an optional end date
for exceptions.
Mel Martin wrote:
> 1. Very nice though not urgent. Fixing the map would be nice also.
> 2. Autologin would be nice.
> 3. Nice but not urgent. Present procedure only has to be done once a
> month so I don't
Along the same lines... it would be nice if the Modes drop down only
listed valid nodes for the station. Minor... but should be real easy.
Another are that needs a look is the Calendar. That has to be the worst
user interface I have ever encountered... except for perhaps MultiPSK
;-) Along with
1. Very nice though not urgent. Fixing the map would be nice also.
2. Autologin would be nice.
3. Nice but not urgent. Present procedure only has to be done once a
month so I don't really mind. Adding support for eQSL is more important.
4. This is important! The current program makes reconciling
In Custom Awards with many options (like Russian RDA), to be able to type the
info,
not having to press down arrow flipping through hundreds of districts.
Marcelo, PY1KN> I believe that it is possible to have a dx4win 8.0
until Dayton. It's usual > for Paul to update the program close to Dayto
I believe that it is possible to have a dx4win 8.0 until Dayton. It's usual
for Paul to update the program close to Dayton. I feel good because Paul is
more interested, writes on the reflector, give replies and listen us the
last time. So i will try to give a wish list with the hope to see these
Hi Tony. I'd like this as well. In the mean time, if you have a couple
of radios that are the same (like two FT1000MPs in an SO2R configuration,
for example) you can use a 9-pin A/B switch box. A cheap and pretty easy
solution to switching between a couple of similar radios. You may have
t
Dear All,
My real big wish for DX4WIN would be for it to be able to accommodate more
than two radios. The change from 1 to 2 radios, a little while ago, was
great. Can it now be written to allow for 3 or 4 radios??
Would be of great interest and save so much unplugging and what have you.
Is it b
Hi all, one thing I would love to see on future version of DX4WIN is as
follows. I receive a number of cards from SWL's confirming that they have
heard me talking to whoever. I always reply to SWL's using the SWL label
printing services of DX4WN. However the label that is printed does not show
t
o:
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 6:23 PM
Subject: [Dx4win] Wish List: Grids Don't Erase
> Greetings all.
>
> Just taking advantage of the 6m opening going on right now and got
> reminded
> of one of the very few aggrevations with DX4Win. That is, every time the
> calls
Having played with "the rocks" this past weekend, I see that the only MS
mode is JT44. JT44 is not used that much anymore in favor of JT65 and
FSK441A (which FSK44 is listed). Perhaps to just put JT as the mode as there
are new flavors popping up all the time.
FYI, I worked NOTHING in the shower,
-
From: "Rick Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'DX4WIN'"
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 4:51 AM
Subject: [Dx4win] WISH LIST
> As I'm typing in some of my old logs to DX4WIN, I wish that it would have
a
> little AI built in. Example: I work a person o
As I'm typing in some of my old logs to DX4WIN, I wish that it would have a
little AI built in. Example: I work a person on SSB mode, the RS(T) should
default to being able to type in TWO characters.
The exception would be for Aurora contacts (57A), but then again if it had
the AI to know that Aur
I second this wish. As it is now both blue and red can meen both confirmed
or not confirmed. Using v 5.03.
Erik
At 11:55 2002-12-14 -0500, Stan Staten wrote:
>DX Spot option to show worked but not confirmed. I have about 100
>unconfirmed countries and would like to improve the probability that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Stan Staten
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 12:56 PM
To: 'WC7N'; DX4WIN
Subject: RE: [Dx4win] Wish list
It may be but it is forced off the screen by different mode and/or band
(the other
It may be but it is forced off the screen by different mode and/or band
(the other blue spot).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of WC7N
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; DX4WIN
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Wish list
DX Spot option to show worked but not confirmed. I have about 100
unconfirmed countries and would like to improve the probability that I
get them confirmed.
73 Stan, N3HS
I will second that motion, that would be a wonderful feature.
Alan, N5PA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stan Staten
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 10:55 AM
To: DX4WIN
Subject: [Dx4win] Wish list
DX Spot option to show worked but not
Geese am I missing something. I always though that was what the blue spots
meant, Worked but not confirmed.
Rod WC7N
- Original Message -
From: "Stan Staten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DX4WIN"
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 8:55 AM
Subject: [Dx4win] Wish
it into a spreadsheet program and sort it any which way.
Mike / W8DN
- Original Message -
From: "David M. Monfried" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 7:48 AM
Subject: [Dx4win] DX4WIN wish list
I've just finished the arduous task of submitting 775
I've just finished the arduous task of submitting 775 QSLs for various DXCC
awards and one change in the Submission feature would have made the job MUCH
easier: Would it be possible for the Submission sort to be by Prefix (in
DX4WIN language, that's DXCC Entity) order, rather than by Callsign? As a
Just wondering if it is possible to make the filter function effective when
doing QSL labels. I have a small number of Qs marked for labels at the
moment but have an even smaller portion of those that I would like to
process right now. Looks like my options are, 1) Process them all, or 2)
Manually
I would like to see an additional entry under "QSL Method" for eQSL.
--
.---.
/ Absolute power\
\ corrupts absolutely /
\ ___--'
_ |/
oo\'
(__)\ _
\ \.' `.
\ \ / \
\ '"\
. ( )
HI Paul & Fellow DX4WINr's,
Some time ago I purchased a RIGblaster plus for all the new digital modes
to use with a TS-850. I'll try to make this short... In order to operate
CW from DX4WIN it would be nice if BOTH the DTR & RTS lines for PTT & CW
keying could be directed to another COM port a
100 matches
Mail list logo
