Or use AM SYNC mode ..
Grant NQ5T
K3 #2091 KX3 #8342
> On Aug 9, 2018, at 1:54 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
>
> Wolfgang,
>
> The width displayed is the audio width. An AM signal has 2 sidebands, so it
> is twice as wide as the audio frequency displayed.
> If you want to listen to AM in a 1.35
Wolfgang,
The width displayed is the audio width. An AM signal has 2 sidebands,
so it is twice as wide as the audio frequency displayed.
If you want to listen to AM in a 1.35 kHz width, then it is possible,
but there will be few highs, and will likely not be intelligible.
You can use SSB
Hello:
Installed a 6 Khz AM-filter and have the following problem:
Filter slot 1: 6Khz Filter
Filter slot 2: 2.7 Khz Filter
Both of the filters are configurated as receive filters for AM mode.
When I switch from filter 1 to filter 2 in AM mode the filter 2 (2.7
KHz) is shown in the display
Hello everyone,
I have an extra 2.8 KHz 8-pole filter for the K3. I would like to
trade it for a 400 Hz filter for CW. My 2.8 filter works perfectly. Anyone
want to trade?
Otherwise, I would buy a 400 Hz filter if anyone has one they would
part with. Let me know your price.
Thanks for the info Ken. I was wondering about any detrimental effects of
those higher gain settings; now that I know nothing is wrong (sounds like
just a normal insertion loss with the narrow filter) I've backed mine down
to 3.
I also put the new synthesizer in the rig and I honestly can't tell
Per Jim’s note below:
I recently upgraded to the new Synthesizers for my ancient K3 #951.
I have 5 Pole 2.7s in both receivers, but multiple 8 Pole narrower filters as
well as a 5 pole 200Hz that always was hard to listen to. I read through the
manual and Fred’s excellent K3 book and found
Hi Elliott,
I tested MCU 5.33 and could not duplicate your problem. I noticed that the
latest production release firmware is 5.38. I loaded 5.38 and again tested
and still could not duplicate your problem. So maybe the problem was only
present with MCU 5.35.
Another possibility is that you
Using the latest K3 firmware MCU 5.35 for my K3 (not K3S). In the Data mode
only, setting the bandwidth of the main receiver also causes the subreceiver
bandwidth to track and be identical. The BSET control XFIL for Data has no
effect. In CW and SSB modes the main receiver XFIL can be adjusted
Changing to MCU 5.38 did not solve the problem. Need to contact K3 support!
73
Elliott WA6TLA
On Oct 23, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Elliott Lawrence wrote:
> Using the latest K3 firmware MCU 5.35 for my K3 (not K3S). In the Data mode
> only, setting the bandwidth of the main
Hi Elliott,
Here's a long-shot. Take a look at your filter selection for your SUB RX
using the K3 Utility program. Maybe you only have one filter enabled for
DATA mode.
73,
Mike K2MK
Elliott Lawrence-5 wrote
> Changing to MCU 5.38 did not solve the problem. Need to contact K3
> support!
> 73
I have a K3. Did not have the problem in 5.33. Do not have the problem in
5.38. I am unable to duplicate your problem. In Data A, and b SEt width
control varies width in sub RX while main RX stays the same.
Your report sounds like you are in diversity mode. My frequency shows as
1.814.9 The right
Joe...
Excellent. Two equipment/function answers for one question. Very much
appreciated. Have a good day.
...robert
On 10/5/2015 00:10, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
Not sure what the connection is, but it resoled the display problem.
The K3 shifts the IF center frequency based on mode,
That should be *too high*, not too low.
Sverre Holm (LA3ZA) wrote
> I consistently get the P3's center frequency to be too low - in this
> example about 45 Hz too low. See screen capture here:
>
> http://folk.uio.no/sverre/LA3ZA/Offset-P3-K3-400HzXFIL-LA3ZA.jpg
-
Sverre, LA3ZA
K2
I'm seeing something similar, but I'm not sure if it's the same effect or
something related.
Using 400 Hz bandwidth and a 400 Hz roofing filter, and using Auto to
zero-beat a CW signal, I consistently get the P3's center frequency to be
too low - in this example about 45 Hz too low. See screen
I just learned from an offline email that this can be fixed using the Cal
function in the P3 (preferreably after 1 hr warm-up) - and indeed that was
the case! Thanks to Bill, NR4C.
Sverre Holm (LA3ZA) wrote
> That should be
*
> too high
*
> , not too low.
> Sverre Holm (LA3ZA) wrote
>> I
Not sure what the connection is, but it resoled the display problem.
The K3 shifts the IF center frequency based on mode, Shift/FC, and
selected filter to center the desired signal in the filter. Without
knowing the IF center frequency (the IS; Get command), the panadapter
[assumed] center
I think I solved this...
In NaP3 there are options for polling various rig parameters [CAT
Polling]. In this section I had polling for "IF Frequency" unchecked.
Once checked, all signals stayed where they belong. Not sure what the
connection is, but it resoled the display problem. Thanks for
I have a K3 [w/ new synthesizer], an LP-Pan, M-Audio Delta, and running
NaP3v4. K3 filters are: 2.7/8p, 1.9/8p, 500/8p, 200/5p. Not sure "where"
this is happening, but decided to start here.
On CW, using the K3 CWT to center a signal, the pan display frequency
for the signal shifts around as
I am new to the list, and did not find this in the archives or other materials.
If this has been discussed or otherwise, a pointer to the data would be great.
When selecting filters for various operational modes on the K3, I was wondering
if the 6k filter is ‘Required’ for ESSB operation, or
Thanks for the tips.
This morning I moved the filter from FL3 to FL4, have used the K3 utility
program to set it up in this slot and have tried 3 and 4 dB of gain but I
still get the same.
Will email support to see what they say.
73
Rich
On 27 September 2014 15:10, Matt Zilmer
After you've done what Bill suggested, try setting the loss (dB) for
this filter, using the K3 Utility program. I believe the equivalent
filter loss is 3-4 dB. This would be normal. The K3 can compensate
for it, as long as you set the value (otherwise assumed to be 0 dB).
Be sure the filter
In addition to the other suggestions you have received (assuming still no
signal through the filter), you may want to try the filter in another slot.
Early on, I had the same problem after installing a 250 Hz filter. the
problem ended up being a coupling cap on the circuit board with no solder on
I also had a solder problem with one of the filter slot steering diodes
on one of my K3's. It was only soldered on one end.
Chuck
W6RD
On 9/27/2014 7:52 AM, Bruce Beford wrote:
In addition to the other suggestions you have received (assuming still no
signal through the filter), you may want to
Hi
I have the 2.7, 1.8 and 250hz filters installed in FL1, FL2 and FL3 in my
K3.
Using the width I can change these filters and see the filter change as I
get narrower. When I get to FL3 which has the 250hz filter, the noise level
disappears totally and there is nothing on the S-meter.
When on
Off the top of my head:
It sounds like the signal isn't getting through the 250 Hz filter when you have
it selected.
Double check that it is installed correctly.
Double check you activated the correct slot in the CONFIG menu.
The XFIL button will allow you to switch filters without changing
What happened to the 5-pole and 8-pole filter plots on the Elecraft web
site? I can't seem to find them anymore.
Any ideas where I might look?
Tnx
N2TK, Tony
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
On Tue Sep 2 2014 at 12:35:38 EDT Tony, N2TK posted ...
What happened to the 5-pole and 8-pole filter plots on the Elecraft web
site?
--- - - - ---
Tony, the page is broken!
--- - - - ---
Brandon,
The page http://www.elecraft.com/K3/K3_filter_plots.htm is broken in
that the plots are no
...@elecraft.com
Cc: tony@verizon.net; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 filter plots
On Tue Sep 2 2014 at 12:35:38 EDT Tony, N2TK posted ...
What happened to the 5-pole and 8-pole filter plots on the Elecraft web
site?
--- - - - ---
Tony, the page is broken
,
N2TK, Tony
-Original Message-
From: Gary W. Hvizdak [mailto:gary.hviz...@cfl.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 1:26 PM
To: bran...@elecraft.com
Cc: tony@verizon.net; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 filter plots
On Tue Sep 2 2014 at 12:35:38 EDT Tony, N2TK
Tnx Phil, but it doesn't work here.
N2TK, Tony
From: Phil Wheeler [mailto:w...@socal.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 2:11 PM
To: N2TK, Tony; 'Gary W. Hvizdak'; bran...@elecraft.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 filter plots
This link can be useful
Yes, the link below works, but the link to the crystal filter plots that is
at that top of that webpage is broken.
Ed W0YK
-
Phil W7OX wrote:
This link can be useful and still works:
http://www.elecraft.com/K3/Roofing_Filters.htm
...@elecraft.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 filter plots
Yes, the link below works, but the link to the crystal filter plots that is
at that top of that webpage is broken.
Ed W0YK
-
Phil W7OX wrote:
This link can be useful
Of Ed Muns
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:39 AM
To: 'Phil Wheeler'; 'N2TK, Tony'; 'Gary W. Hvizdak'; bran...@elecraft.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 filter plots
Yes, the link below works, but the link to the crystal filter plots that is
at that top of that webpage
Have you refreshed your page?
-Original Message-
From: Joe Subich, W4TV li...@subich.com
Sent: Sep 2, 2014 12:39 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 filter plots
They certainly don't work for me.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2014-09-02 3:28 PM, Thomas R. Houston
for me.
Tom K6OKE
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net]On
Behalf Of Ed Muns
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:39 AM
To: 'Phil Wheeler'; 'N2TK, Tony'; 'Gary W.
Hvizdak'; bran...@elecraft.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3
: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:39 AM
To: 'Phil Wheeler'; 'N2TK, Tony'; 'Gary W. Hvizdak'; bran...@elecraft.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 filter plots
Yes, the link below works, but the link to the crystal filter plots that is
at that top of that webpage is broken
Of Ed Muns
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:39 AM
To: 'Phil Wheeler'; 'N2TK, Tony'; 'Gary W. Hvizdak'; bran...@elecraft.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 filter plots
Yes, the link below works, but the link to the crystal filter plots that is
at that top
-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Ed Muns
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:39 AM
To: 'Phil Wheeler'; 'N2TK, Tony'; 'Gary W. Hvizdak'; bran...@elecraft.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 filter plots
Yes, the link below works
: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 4:29 PM
To: Joe Subich,W4TV; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 filter plots
Have you refreshed your page?
-Original Message-
From: Joe Subich, W4TV li...@subich.com
Sent: Sep 2, 2014 12:39 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re
I would like to set one of the filter presets (I/II) to full width for working
digital contacts using Data A mode. However it seems that the presets are
being narrowed back down after switching between modes and/or bands. Could
someone explain why this is happening and am I taking the correct
I have recently been examining how my K3 filters operate and was curious if I
could somehow expand the range I can use my lowest filter which is 250 kHz. It
generally cuts out at 300 kHz and then my 1.8 kHz filter takes over. I would
like to use the 250 kHz filter up to 400 kHz as I have read
Hi Keith,
In the K3 utility program, you can change the filter bandwidths to
whatever you need. Many ops use this function to set filter switch
points that are different than the listed bandwidth. Look under the
Configure tab, then push the Configure Crystal Filters radio button.
Note that
How do i change the cut out point for this filter? Is this something
I can change in the utility program under filter calibration?
Yes, set the bandwidth of that slot to 380 or 400 Hz. See the Owner's
Manual or K3 Utility help file.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2/26/2014 9:28 AM, Keith
Matt,
Thanks, I was hoping that was the case. The 1.8 kHz filter is good for SSB but
not exactly what I want at 350 kHz in CW. I think I will set it for 600 kHz and
see what happens.
I really appreciate your quick response.
Keith
AK6ZZ
Sent from my iPhone please excuse typos
On Feb 26,
Thanks Joe for additional clarification will set to 400 kHz.
73,
Keith
AK6ZZ
Sent from my iPhone please excuse typos
On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:45 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV li...@subich.com wrote:
How do i change the cut out point for this filter? Is this something
I can change in the utility
Hi Keith,
I understand, and I'm running the 250 Hz filters in main and sub
receivers at 350 Hz, myself. If you make this type of adjustment, you
might want to check the amount of gain for the filter with the changed
switch point. It shouldn't be off by much, but worth checking anyway.
73,
matt
Chris (K4WIN) writes ...
I saw your post but the link to the 700 INRAD filter didn't work for me.
-
Hi Chris,
I apologize, but our server just crashed a moment ago. This has been
happening a lot recently and typically it's been down for a couple of hours.
TNX 73,
Gary KI4GGX
I installed both AM FM filters and set them up using the K3 utility program,
with AM using both filters. When I adjust the filter width on the K3 the max I
can get on AM is 5 kHz. On FM it shows N/A. What am I missing ?
Jack
W4GRJ
__
I installed both AM FM filters and set them up using the K3 utility program,
with AM using both filters. When I adjust the filter width on the K3 the max I
can get on AM is 5 kHz. On FM it shows N/A. What am I missing ?
Jack
W4GRJ
__
Jack,
You are not missing anything. You are seeing the audio bandwidth
displayed on the K3. Yes, the audio bandwidth is fixed in FM mode, so
if you attempt to change if with the width knob, you will see N/A.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 11/29/2012 6:03 AM, W4GRJ wrote:
I installed both AM FM
Morning all
A long shot:- does any UK user want to sell me a used roofing CW filter for
the K3 ? Prefer 500Hz but open to suggestions.
Thanks
John G4ZTR
__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 7644 (20121030) __
The message was checked
When I installed the 250Hz 8 pole filter in my minimal K3 (base
+ K144XV + KXV3A + FM filter), the procedure in the manual
appendix A (p77ff) calls for the removal of the K144XV
transverter. After looking inside, removing it looked
unnecessary, so I proceeded without removing it. I encountered
James,
The full procedure is a bit long for an email, but please see page 46 in the
current version of the K3 Owners Manual, which is available under Manuals
and Downloads at the Elecraft web page. All of the filter setup functions
are accessed through the CONFIG menus. There are 3 key steps to
No, I'm not a human 'Skimmer' -- but I can pick out an individual cw
signal within about an 8 KHz span if it's pitch falls somewhere between
about 200 Hz and 8 KHz, and can probably 'guestimate' by the pitch, to
which signal it corresponds on the P3, and then quickly place my TX
signal nearby
Bruce Beford-2 wrote
I would not assume most users prefer this. I have 2.8/1.8 and it suits
me
just fine, thank you. The 1.8 works well under contest conditions, when
needed.
I found the 1.8k is too narrow for running stations at high rates (150 per
hour) in contests. It's OK when you have
Thanks, Don.
I should explain a bit more. In fact I confused running bw down to
2.1 or 1.8 KHz with running the NR function. It is the NR which adds
what I termed audio distortion to the signal and not narrowing
bw. At least not at 1.8-2.1 KHz. Ringing below 50-Hz makes it
Stan,
Since you have decided to go with the 2.7 filter, you have a couple
decisions to make. Do you pay for matched filters between the main and
the sub so you can have good diversity reception, or do you cheat and
set the filter offsets to the mean of the two filters.
At a 2.7 width, the
Thanks for more great info Don. I figure $20 is well spent in just having
them match my other 2.7Khz, 5 pole.
After reading this through a couple of times and talking with a couple of K3
users I'm going with
2.7 KHz, 5 pole - matched
2.1 KHz, 8 pole
400 Hz, 8 pole
200 Hz, 5 pole - matched
I originally chose the 8-pole filters thinking the steeper skirts
would be useful should I ever take the radio into a dense RF
environment like it is in the lower-48 states. MY experience with CW
indicated 400-Hz was adequate as I could narrow this down with the
DSP filter. I chose the 2.8
don't need an AM filter. I have it, don't use it. Waste for me.
My 2 cents.
Bill N2WL
On Sep 26, 2012, at 12:00 PM, elecraft-requ...@mailman.qth.net wrote:
[Elecraft] K3 - Filter suggestions for new builder
__
Elecraft mailing list
Ed,
I would think you are hearing the results of a narrow passband rather
than DSP audio distortion.
I say that because in all cases with the K3, it is the DSP that
determines the filter width rather than the roofing filter. What I am
saying is that even if you put in a 1.8k filter, SSB at a
On 9/26/2012 1:35 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:
... But I learned that audio is limited to 4-KHz
regardless of IF filter so I ended up selling the extra 13-KHz filter.
...
73, Ed - KL7UW
I really hope that this does not apply to received audio to the
headphones or loudspeaker! I just
Sorry, but yes, the K3 audio is limited at 4 kHz, no matter whether it
is to the headphones or to the speaker. Please do not shoot the
messenger. but that information is in the archives of this reflector in
several places - it has been discussed periodically.
If you want to lobby for extended
Hello Don,
Thanks for the quick response. I was just going through the K3 manual
and KE7X's excellent book, but haven't seen any reference to that. For
general ham radio operation I don't see it as a limitation, but it's a
bit disappointing that the FM filters that will arrive tomorrow along
The limit occurs several places ... adjust the HI setting and one
will find 4.20 is the maximum available. There is also an analog
lowpass filter in the audio (headphone and speaker) between the DAC
and the headphone/speaker amplifiers.
I'm sure this limitation derives from the roughly 10 KHz
Joe,
Good observations, all. I agree that 4.2 KHz is certainly good enough
for communications audio.
The only reason I had for putting the FM filter in the 2nd receiver was
to be able to hear more of the split in a broad pileup situation (like
the extremely large split widths that we saw a
Right, Don!
I still believe that many K3 users are under the erroneous impression that the
roofing filter determines the receiver bandwidth. It does not. The HI and LO
knobs do.
The only thing the roofing filter does is determine the MAXIMUM possible
bandwidth of the receiver.
In 99% of
The only reason I had for putting the FM filter in the 2nd receiver
was to be able to hear more of the split in a broad pileup situation
(like the extremely large split widths that we saw a few months ago
with 7O6T),
The width of the roofing filter has nothing at all to do with hearing
more
Another way of looking at it is this:
Just because a signal gets inside of your roofing filter doesn't mean squat. If
the mixers can handle the signal's level, and the HI LO cut controls can slice
off the signal, you won't even know it's there. You simply don't care!
The only time this could
Joe,
Understood. I wanted to be able to simultaneously hear and see 12 Khz or
so of cw signals, thinking that I could more quickly identify the
station being worked. For example, if I know the dx station is listening
from 14.010 to 14.020 (admittedly pretty wide), I figured I could
include
*Al,
whilst your statements hold true for you, I DO use the 1.8Khz almost as my
default. Attention paid to Hi/Lo gives me nice intelligibility and if you
were listening to 3D2C last night on 20M and witnessed the deplorable
behavior of stations deliberately providing QRM on their call frequency
Hello Stan.
I am an avid CW enthusiast and spend 100% of my time, usually around 4-6
hours a night on 20/40m CW. I have 2 identical loaded to the the max
K3/100's and P3's purchased late this year. I have been very happy with my
filter choices:
1. 13KHz FM
2. 6KHz AM INRAD
3. 2.8KHz INRAD
4.
I figured I could include that entire range within the FM filter
bandwidth (which I still can do), AND also hear all 10 KHz of those
signals (which I've learned I cannot do).
Your ears are much better than mine if you can actually copy a full
10 KHz wide audio pile-up. I have enough trouble
I'm asking for a little help with filter choices. I've read all I can on the
subject
and have come up with what I think is a good choice for me.
I'm going to be getting the sub-receiver so I'm going to be getting 2 of
each filter.
At almost $300 a filter set I would hate to make a choice that I
Stan,
Your first 3 selections mirror mine. I think you'll find them all useful.
I have only the 2.8 and 400 in my second receiver, however, and find that to
be good for me. You do not have to install filter pairs for every IF width.
Filters are pretty easy to install, so there's no penalty
You have chosen the bread-and-butter choices. You may find they are all
you need. You can add others later, if needed.
Could you go with less? Personally, I only use the sub-receiver for
chasing split DX. I don't need razor sharp filtering - in fact, I need
to hear a broad spectrum so I can
I'm pretty sure about getting the:
2.8 Khz, 8 pole
1.8 Khz, 8 pole
400 Hz, 8 pole
I doubt that the difference in performance justifies the upgrade
charge for 2.8 vs. the standard 2.7 KHz filters - particularly if one
is also getting 2.1 or 1.8 KHz narrow SSB filters. The savings
nearly
I sceond Joe's comments.
here: 2.7 , 2.1 , 400 and 200 in Main rx;
2.7 , 2.1 and 400 in Sub.
73
Arie PA3A
Op 25-9-2012 20:08, Joe Subich, W4TV schreef:
I'm pretty sure about getting the:
2.8 Khz, 8 pole
1.8 Khz, 8 pole
400 Hz, 8 pole
I doubt that the difference in performance
ae7...@gmail.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 1:20:37 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - Filter suggestions for new builder
I'm asking for a little help with filter choices. I've read all I can on the
subject
and have come up with what I think is a good choice for me.
I'm
Thanks for all the feed-back. It looks like I'm at least in the right ball
park.
I definitely want the diversity reception so I'll be doubling most if not
all filters.
I've decided to stick with the 2.7 for now. I doubt my ears could hear the
difference.
Interesting that most here have gone
I would not assume most users prefer this. I have 2.8/1.8 and it suits me
just fine, thank you. The 1.8 works well under contest conditions, when
needed. Remember there is almost always a silent majority.
73,
Bruce, N1RX
Interesting that most here have gone with the 2.1 vs. the 1.8 KHz
Beford
Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2012 6:13 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - Filter suggestions for new builder
I would not assume most users prefer this. I have 2.8/1.8 and it suits me
just fine, thank you. The 1.8 works well under contest conditions, when
needed
The subject of extra-narrow SSB bandwidths comes up fairly regularly. These 1.8
kHz (and even 1.5 kHz in use out there) bandwidths are not effective for
everybody. The older I get, the less I can tolerate these narrow bandwidths
for
SSB, even in a contest. They give me listener's fatigue. I
G'day,
2700Hz and 500Hz in both main and sub RX here. Nothing else, not felt
the need, however, an FM filter could be added in one RX one day.
There have been measurements which show that the 5-pole filters have
superior group delay characteristics when compared to the 8-pole.
Regards,
Mike
On 9/25/2012 4:22 PM, Mike Harris wrote:
2700Hz and 500Hz in both main and sub RX here. Nothing else, not felt
the need, however, an FM filter could be added in one RX one day.
The only reason to agonize over roofing filters is, How many strong
stations do you have near you? I have the two
Greetings, Just got my new K3 options in Monday and
had them all installed by Tuesday morning. I installed
3 of the 4 possible optional roofing filters. They have
been turned on and the BW set in config. My problem
is when I power down the radio they cannot be called
up by tapping the XFIL button.
-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Mike Sanders
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:40 AM
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Filter Selection
Greetings, Just got my new K3 options in Monday and
had them all installed by Tuesday morning. I installed
...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Mike Sanders
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:40 AM
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Filter Selection
Greetings, Just got my new K3 options in Monday and had them all installed
by Tuesday morning. I installed
3 of the 4 possible optional roofing filters
...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Mike Sanders
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:40 AM
To: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Filter Selection
Greetings, Just got my new K3 options in Monday and had them all installed
by Tuesday morning. I installed
I have 2 K-3's in SO2R configuration with a basic 2.7 Khz and 400 hz
filters.
When listening to RTTY and the filter is wide open there will be a lot of
signals.
Turning the filter to 400 Hz the signals seem to just about disappear with
only the very strong ones audible/visible. Where am I a miss
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Rieff k0yr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 2 K-3's in SO2R configuration with a basic 2.7 Khz and 400 hz
filters.
When listening to RTTY and the filter is wide open there will be a lot of
signals.
Turning the filter to 400 Hz the signals seem to just about
Why an 8 pole filter
OR
Why a 5 pole filter?
Yeah I know the 5 poles are cheaper... but other than that.
Phil
Santa Fe
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
, 2012 8:12 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Filter question. Again?
Why an 8 pole filter
OR
Why a 5 pole filter?
Yeah I know the 5 poles are cheaper... but other than that.
Phil
Santa Fe
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http
Those 8-pole filters have steeper skirts. Either the 5- or 8-pole
work quite well.
I use 5-pole for the narrower filters (250, 500), and the 8-pole for
1.8, 2.8, 13 KHz bandwidths.
73,
matt W6NIA
K3 #24
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:12:58 -0600, you wrote:
Why an 8 pole filter
OR
Why a 5 pole
My thought on the 5 pole was that it would give you some protection but because
the skirts were not as steep you could hear someone calling you off frequency
better. They would be down but not out. The 5's have slightly less insertion
loss and are cheaper. On the other hand they need an offset
Good point. It would depend upon whether or not you'd want to hear
someone so far from zero beat.
73,
matt
On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:38:06 -0400, you wrote:
My thought on the 5 pole was that it would give you some protection but
because the skirts were not as steep you could hear someone
GM Keith: Notwithstanding Joe's comments related to Na3p, I've noticed a K3
software memory problem which may or may not be related.
There seems to be two instances of when the K3 appears to loose its mind.
(BTW its s/n 2432 using 4.47 and 2.73 FW.)
1st is when I've set up the Norm I and II
FWIW, I had some goofy things happening like this during a contest. I was
having trouble tuning my antenna and thought it was just due to ice on it.
After the contest was over, I looked out the window to find part of my loop was
laying in the snow.
That was causing RF in the shack. I no
Wilhelm
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:46 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Filter questions
I could take offense at that statement. We each speak from our level of
education and information available.
I thought we had a technical forum here - there are some asides
degraded the total response in the stop band.
73,
Igor, N1YX
- Original Message -
From: Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:33:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Filter questions
On 3/27/2012 11:12 AM, k.i
1 - 100 of 418 matches
Mail list logo