HiWin4K3Suite supports this without hardware. 73 Tom
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From:
Jim Brown <j...@audiosystemsgroup.com> Date: 2016-05-20 3:56 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 with KX3
This
This looks like a nice pieces of software, but it is only needed if
you're feeding the KAT500 less than 10-20W (that is, KX3 barefoot). The
KAT500 senses operating frequency from RF, but it needs about that level
to do so.
Another good reason for using this band decoder is to automatically
You need the Paula Keezer KX3 band decoder. Makes the KX3 look like a K3 for
the purpose.
http://www.nx1p.net/what-is-a-kx3-band-decoder/
-
Chuck, KE9UW
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KAT500-with-KX3-tp7617615p7617672.html
Sent from the Elecraft
Yes Bill, I believe that is correct but I want it to band follow so that the
solution will be set to the last correct solution for the current frequency
when only receiving. It follows the K3/KPA500 and the the question is “how do
I implement this with the KX3?
Michael Blake
> On May
I believe it will sense RF on a dit or two. So only the coax is required.
Sent from my iPhone
...nr4c. bill
> On May 19, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Michael Blake wrote:
>
> Which data connection(s) do I use to control the band/frequency settings on
> the KAT500 when the transceiver
Which data connection(s) do I use to control the band/frequency settings on the
KAT500 when the transceiver is a KX3? The amplifier is a low drive modified
ALS-600 which seems like a straight forward keying connection but I am not sure
about the data connection from the KX3’s E980232 "Cable
Mike,
You can order one from Elecraft.
Order the KXSERa (3.5mm to DB9-F): Extra Cable 3.5mm to RS232 DB9-F for
KX3.
It can be found in the KX3 or the KPA500 order listings.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 5/10/2016 6:26 PM, Mike VE3YF wrote:
Hi:
Does anyone happen to have a Serial Cable for the KAT500
Hi:
Does anyone happen to have a Serial Cable for the KAT500 Tuner that they are
not using and willing to sell to me. I have a USB Cable, but at the moment a
serial cable would work better for me. Tnx.
73 De Mike
VE3YF
http://www.ve3yf.com
[http://www.ve3yf.com/]
an.qth.net>
Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility Question
Message-ID: <F5CAB1C1B7CC4181BDE365D70E637DD4@SHACKXPS>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
I am trying to understand the operation of the KAT500 utility. Not
sure if my problem is pilot error or m
You're absolutely right, Wes. It's obvious my problem was pilot error.
The danger of doing too many things at once...
Scott N9AA
On 3/6/16 8:02 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote:
Did you not read the post? He's talking about a KAT500, not a KAT3.
On 3/6/2016 10:31 AM, Scott Manthe wrote:
I think you
Did you not read the post? He's talking about a KAT500, not a KAT3.
On 3/6/2016 10:31 AM, Scott Manthe wrote:
I think you have to have the KAT3 tuner physically installed in the radio to
be able to select ANT 2 on the radio or in the utility.
73,
Scott N9AA
On 3/6/16 8:08 AM, Ed G wrote:
I think you have to have the KAT3 tuner physically installed in the
radio to be able to select ANT 2 on the radio or in the utility.
73,
Scott N9AA
On 3/6/16 8:08 AM, Ed G wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to understand the operation of the KAT500 utility. Not
sure if my problem is pilot
Hello,
I am trying to understand the operation of the KAT500 utility. Not
sure if my problem is pilot error or maybe a problem within the tuner
itself. I have the latest firmware installed.
I am unable to manually select the antenna using the utility. I cannot
physically check the
Hi all,
After finishing up my K3S build with only one incident (the 400Hz filters
mysteriously not working in the new rig -- they are now at Elecraft for
testing, FYI), I am reconnecting my K3S and the rest of my station.
Finally, I got motivated to finally get my KAT500 connected to my computer!
That was my first thought - so I laid out a new coax to the antenna.
That said, this morning everything works just fine. I can only figure
the KAT500 heard me say that it was leaving and it decided to work. Be
interesting to see how long this holds.
Bill W2BLC
For the past month I have been experiencing tuning problems with the
KAT500.
The antenna in question is a simple 75 meter dipole fed with coax. You
tune the antenna at 3922, 2955 and 3975 - just for example. When you
return to those frequencies, a few hours later, the tuning is all off
and
Have you checked your KAT500 with a dummy load instead of feed line?
This would tell you either your KAT500 or feed line to antenna (and antenna) is
in trouble.
73 de JH3SIF, Keith
> 2016/02/05 6:17、Bill のメール:
>
> For the past month I have been experiencing tuning
Just so all know - I do use the MAN mode. It is too crazy in AUTO -
always working and jumping around.
Bill W2BLC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Bill,
After you do the initial TUNE (training the ATU), do you switch it to
MAN? If not try that and see if it corrects your situation.
If not, then it is time to contact support.
73,
Don W3FPR
On 2/4/2016 4:17 PM, Bill wrote:
For the past month I have been experiencing tuning problems with
Is it to have a change made to the KAT500 firmware so we could lock it in
Manual Mode
or Maybe use a double tap to change mode and still a press and hold to turn it
off
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
Since you are running KPA500 along with the KAT500 and you stated you don't
have a balun, I assume you don't have a common mode choke either.
I suggest a trip to http://audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf as I suspect
you have RF in the shack.
73
jim ab3cv
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Wes
I have done the reading of the printout - some really crazy SWR numbers
for the antenna that I know are not correct.
So far as RF in the shack - I might consider that - if things had not
been working correctly until abut a month ago. Nothing has changed until
then, causing all the efforts and
It is possible that you have bad coax, a bad connection or water ingress in
your antenna system. It would be interesting to see if a manual tuner
remains stable.
John KK9A
Bill w2blc at nycap.rr.com
Thu Feb 4 19:39:04 EST 2016
for the antenna that I know are not correct.
So far as RF in the
After a good tune, I would use the KAT500 utility to examine and record the
selected component values.
When the failure occurs, before retuning I would look at them again and see if
they are the same.
Also after a good tune, I would run up and down the band to cycle the relays and
see if
I'm about to send my KPA500 To the shop at Elecraft and I wonder if
anyone has had any success using an ALPHA 87A runing low power into
KAT500?
If so how many watts did you run into the KTA500?
Thanks.
ARS N5GE
__
Elecraft mailing
Per page 2 of the manual :
3 - 30 Mhz 600W into 5 > 500 ohm ( 10:1 swr )
1000W into 16 > 150 ohm ( 3.1 swr )
1.8 - 2 Mhz 600W into 500 ohm (5:1 low imp swr) ( 10:1 Hi Imp.
swr )
--
View this message in context:
nal TTL device? Does it pick middle of the
> band if there is no last used frequency?
>
> 73,
>
> Cliff K3LL
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Frescura [mailto:c...@cfcorp.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:58 PM
> To: 'Cady, Fred'; 'Elecraft@mailman.q
: Monday, November 16, 2015 9:36 PM
To: Cliff Frescura
Cc: Cady, Fred; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
If the band lines are used only, the ATU picks a mid band freq if there is
no history since last ATU power up. On first tx after that, it performs a
memory recall
ter in very short period of time between fast RX/TX/RX
transitions is a bit unsettling.
73,
Cliff K3LL
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 10:04 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [
.
From: Elecraft <elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net> on behalf of Cliff Frescura
<c...@cfcorp.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 3:09 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
Antenna issues specific to the OP aside, there is a
[mailto:c...@cfcorp.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:58 PM
To: 'Cady, Fred'; 'Elecraft@mailman.qth.net'
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
Apparently yes. However, I'm using the KAT500 serial port to communicate
frequency to the KAT500 via logging software (DXLabs), not auxBus, since
PM
To: Cliff Frescura; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Re-Tuning
Are you asking for the KAT500 to choose two different tuning solutions when
operating split? At present it chooses the VFO B frequency for its solution
according to:
MCU 4.83 / DSP 2.82, 2-8-2014
* FSK-D
Clark ; j...@audiosystemsgroup.com
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Ant outlets
Robert,
The KAT500 can select 1 of 3 antennas for any band. All you need to do
is select the antenna of interest from the Front Panel - no computer
required.
KAT500 Utility can make
On Sat,11/14/2015 8:37 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's
still solid after all this wind.
Other suggestions. First, put it on bypass and see what the SWR
indication is. If it's reasonable, go to MAN mode, force a tuning (put
K3 in TUN
On Sat,11/14/2015 6:35 PM, G4GNX wrote:
Is it possible to defeat this feature as I tend to use two different multi-band
antennas, according to conditions.
I do exactly that -- I have two antennas each for all bands, three
antennas for 40m and 160m. Yes, these settings are programmable in
Robert,
The KAT500 can select 1 of 3 antennas for any band. All you need to do
is select the antenna of interest from the Front Panel - no computer
required.
KAT500 Utility can make the setup of the various bands and antennas
easier than doing it manually. That does require a computer,
I will put the antenna analyzer on it tomorrow and make sure it's still
solid after all this wind.
On 11/14/2015 11:31 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
M2 Log Periodic flat from bottom to top.
On 11/14/2015 05:34 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On Sat,11/14/2015 1:07 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
Once I tuned I was
M2 Log Periodic flat from bottom to top.
On 11/14/2015 05:34 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On Sat,11/14/2015 1:07 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
Once I tuned I was good for only about 2KHz. Any thoughts? Antenna
has been fine everywhere else.
What's the antenna? From the symptom, I suspect it's nowhere
I am about to buy a KAT500 and having read the owner’s manual (shock horror!) I
notice that the tuner will choose an antenna according to a particular
band/frequency it’s encountered before.
Is it possible to defeat this feature as I tend to use two different multi-band
antennas, according to
Doesn't the KAT500 come with a utility program already installed? And...can the
unit be operated without a computer connection?
Robert W. Clark, Executive Director
Center for Professional Development
Career and Technical Education
Temple University
> On Nov 14, 2015, at 9:52 PM, Jim Brown
On Sat,11/14/2015 7:09 PM, Robert Clark wrote:
Doesn't the KAT500 come with a utility program already installed? And...can the
unit be operated without a computer connection?
The KAT500 Utility is a CONFIGURATION UTILITY. Look at it. It allows the
user to choose which outputs CAN be used on
On Sat,11/14/2015 1:07 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
Once I tuned I was good for only about 2KHz. Any thoughts? Antenna
has been fine everywhere else.
What's the antenna? From the symptom, I suspect it's nowhere near
resonance on 12m, and the KAT500 is jumping through hoops to get power
into the
While working the Willis Island pileup, following the operator on 12
meters as he stepped up for each QSO, I was having to retune the KAT500
every few steps. Which seemed odd. Once I tuned I was good for only
about 2KHz. Any thoughts? Antenna has been fine everywhere else.
73, Byron
Not to mention the losses in the tuner itself. My K3 can almost
match on open antenna connection. If I were to transmit, guess
where all the power would go.
73 Bill AE6JV
On 11/14/15 at 2:34 PM, j...@audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) wrote:
On Sat,11/14/2015 1:07 PM, Byron Peebles wrote:
I don't believe that it has anything to do with whether or not a match can be
reached. Some SWRs are simply too difficult to measure accurately, even with an
error-corrected network analyzer. For near ideal reactances or very high or
very low SWR, reflection measurements are inappropriate.
Some of what you say is true, but has nothing to do with the problem.
Soapbox comment: Personally, I would (and do) rather use Heliax before I would
ever use ladder line.
On 11/4/2015 2:21 PM, Ken wrote:
The results almost totally depend on the length of the ladder line. At certain
lengths,
The results almost totally depend on the length of the ladder line. At
certain lengths, it will act as an impedance transformer and could load
your 80m dipole quite well. An 80m dipole on 160 will have a low
impedance at the feed point. A quarter wave of ladder line will
transform that
First, this is a curiosity question about KAT500 utility only. I don’t intend
to use my antenna on 160 meters.
I use the KAT500 with my 80-meter dipole fed by ladder line and a 4:1 Balun to
Coax for last 20 feet. This antenna works excellently in concert with the
KAT500 for 80, 40, and 30
On 11/4/2015 12:59 PM, Phil Hystad wrote:
I use the KAT500 with my 80-meter dipole fed by ladder line and a 4:1
Balun to Coax for last 20 feet. This antenna works excellently in
concert with the KAT500 for 80, 40, and 30 meter bands. I don’t use
it with other bands.
Feed point Z's:
Guys, read what he wrote, not what you think he wrote.
He had a question about the operation of the metering in the KAT500, he wasn't
looking for advice on antenna design or on the use of ladder line.
If he wants that he can read my paper here:
http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/Ladder_Line.pdf
On Wed,11/4/2015 3:04 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote:
If he wants that he can read my paper here:
http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/Ladder_Line.pdf
By all means DO read and STUDY it -- it's a GREAT piece of work.
73, Jim K9YC
__
Elecraft mailing list
Wes…
Thanks, you are exactly right. My curiosity is about what the KAT500 was doing
and the value of the BYPASS SWR versus the values I saw of the Tuned (or, not
tuned) SWR.
Dick’s answer was right on and satisfied all my curiosity needs.
Though thanks to all that took the time to write
Some may recall I had a issue with my KAT500 not connecting to the computer
therefore not allowing me to use the KAT Utility. After checking com ports and
ever purchasing a new KXUSB cable from Elecraft, I sent the unit off to the
mother ship for a look-see. Turns out we lost transistors Q1
never
tried it.
Good luck and 73!
Jack Brindle, W6FB
Elecraft Engineering
>
> 73,
>
> Cliff K3LL/6
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Frescura [mailto:c...@cfcorp.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 2:10 PM
> To: 'Jack Brindle'
> Cc: 'Elecraf
[mailto:c...@cfcorp.com]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 2:10 PM
To: 'Jack Brindle'
Cc: 'Elecraft Reflector'
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control?
Thanks Jack and others that replied off list.
I'm going to go with the y cable sniffer approach. Since I don't use the amp
all the
[mailto:jackbrin...@me.com]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 12:55 PM
To: Cliff Frescura
Cc: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control?
Or connect the Kenwood’s serial port to the KPA500’s Radio port, then set the
RADIO = SERIAL in the KPA.
Follow the directions
he KPA500), or implement BAND0-3 and make it
> minimally emulate a K3S into the KPA500.
>
> 73,
>
> Cliff K3LL
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dick Dievendorff [mailto:d...@elecraft.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 10:55 AM
> To: Cliff Frescura
> Cc: e
Hi,
If I change bands on the KAT500 via the PC Data port, it appears that the
new band data is not sent to the Amp Control connector. Is this expected
behavior? (hoping no).
For reference, my setup is:
Kenwood TS-940
DXLabs Logging program
KAT500
KPA500
The 940 is connected to
The KAT500 can read, but not pull down the 4 band change lines.
Dick, K6KR
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 21:07, Cliff Frescura wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> If I change bands on the KAT500 via the PC Data port, it appears that the
> new band data is not sent to the
]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 10:55 AM
To: Cliff Frescura
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [KAT500] PC Data to Amp Control?
The KAT500 can read, but not pull down the 4 band change lines.
Dick, K6KR
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 21:07, Cliff Frescura
I have a K3 and the KAT500.
Today I realized that when I switched from, say, 10m to 6m that the ANT
stayed with ANT-1. In fact, it stays on whatever I manually move it to.
I also have ANT3 which is a cantenna dummy load kludge, fwiw.
Using the KAT500 Utility I verified that 6m has "Enabled"
On 04-Oct-15 1611, Bob KD7YZ wrote:
> What can I check, here, to see why the antenna tuner no longer
> automatically switches when I change bands?
>
got the answer direct email ... seems due to the extreme rats-nest of
cable(s) to 3 XVxx transverters; EME sequencers, KAT500, PC cables and
stuff
Sounds like the amplifier key line is not connected thru the KAT500. The ATU
must be able to break the amp key line during tuning and all other ATU relay
transitions.
Dick, K6KR
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 04:47, dave_w0ru wrote:
>
> Fred,
> I am now trying
I finally found out the answer. In checking the AuxBus cables, I found a
cable connecting the K3 Key Out to the KPA500 PA Key. Removing this cable
made the fault go away. Perhaps I had followed the Figure 3 on page 23 of
the KPA500 manual at some point. Anyway there is a lot of cabling back
there.
n?"
Ron AC7AC
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of dave_w0ru
Sent: Friday, October 2, 2015 1:05 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Fault
I finally found out the answer. In checking
dave_w0ru wrote
> With the
*
> KAT500
*
> in Standby, I can tune with the KAT500 just fine.
That should read:
With the *KPA500* in Standby,
Dave w0ru
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KAT500-Fault-tp7608563p7608580.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing
___
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net <elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net> on
behalf of dave_w0ru <dken...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 9:32 AM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Fault
dave_w0ru wrote
> With the
*
> KAT500
*
> in
Fred,
I am now trying the KAT500 output going to a dummy load. When the K3 is set
at about 22 watts out, the KPA500 shows 440 Watts out. When I use the Tune
feature on the K3 with Manual Tune feature on the KAT500, there is no fault.
However, when I send with the K3 keyer and with Manual Tune on
I have the K3, KPA500 and KAT500 setup per Figure 1 on page 5 of the owner's
manual. With the KAT500 in Standby, I can tune with the KAT500 just fine.
When I try to tune with the KPA500 in Operate, I get a fault on the KAT500.
The KAT500 utility shows the maximum power set at 1500 watts. My
As an update, the KAT500 is headed back to the mother ship for a check up. All
indications now are that the problem lies internal to the tuner.Thanks to
everyone who provided input. Your help was very much appreciated. 73,
Bill-W0BBI
As an up date, I ordered a new KXUSB cable but the computer still does not
recognize the KAT500. The original 'COM PORT' that was used prior to all this
issue is gone and I am unable to find it. I have managed to work through all
the steps from uninstalling and reinstalling the program and
I've gone through a bit of this under Windows 10.
Open DEVICE MANAGER and the PORTS device listing. This is in
Settings->System->About->Device Manager.
Connect your cable to the KAT500. You should hear a beep and see the
device appear. That is the COM.
The ports are 38400 and the COM
Hi
Google for hidden devices in windows device manager and follow the directions
to clean up your serial ports. Once done, plug the cable into the computer and
check which comport it is.
73 Tom
va2fsq.com
Sent from BlueMail
On Sep 25, 2015, 3:47 PM, at 3:47 PM, Byron Peebles
After some help hints from Dick (K6KR), Gary and the on-line trouble shoot
guide; we were able to trace to issue down to a faulty DB9/KXUSB cable. We have
ordered a new cable and will pass along any other learning that may occur
concerning this issue.Thanks to all.73, Bill - W0BBI
I discover a problem with my KAT500 in that the Utility shows that no Software
is loaded. It still received signals from the computer as I can control it from
HRD but I cannot make changes via the Utility. The cable Interface Cable shows
only "flashing red" light. To this point I have confirmed
Bill,
Check baud rate. Could be you are not connected to the kat500 hence no fw
upload to your PC.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: "Bill Wiehe via Elecraft" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: 18/09/2015 9:53 PM
To: "Elecraft Reflector" <elecraft@mailma
place
( %appdata%\Elecraft\KAT500 Configuration) The folder is empty!
Was hoping it was just a config file that we could look at.
Might I suggest you look in the Control Panel Device Manager, and
determine which port is being assigned to the KAT500. It should be
listed under Ports and LPT
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility
Brian,
I had this happen to me one time.I believe it was trying to find the
KAT500 on a port that was no longer the correct COM port. A device was
there but it wasn't the KAT500.Try unplugging all other USB devices
Warren:
FYI. I'm running into serial ports on the PC, not USB.
Brian KD0HII
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Warren
Merkel
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 07:21
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility
[mailto:w...@i29.net]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 20:41
To: Brian Linn
Cc: Warren Merkel; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility
Hi to the group.
I have not wanted to get into this discussion but I have had a similar problem
with other programs and will throw this out
To Anyone!
Issue: KAT500 Utility will not run
Version: 1.14.4.10
Windows: 7 Pro 64 bit
Observations:
1) It appears to correctly install
2) When one attempts to start the utility, it shows in the Task Manager
as a process (KAT500Utility.exe *32)
3) The application window
, 2015 17:22
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 Utility
To Anyone!
Issue: KAT500 Utility will not run
Version: 1.14.4.10
Windows: 7 Pro 64 bit
Observations:
1) It appears to correctly install
2) When one attempts to start the utility, it shows in the Task
I'm trying to use the KAT500 Remote Utility and having an issue. I've used this
in the past without incident, although that may have been an earlier version.
The current version 1.0.9.0 connects to the KAT500 normally, briefly displays
the (correct) state of the tuner then almost immediately
Don Elecraft:
I'm having difficulty connecting to either my KAT500 or W2 via a serial
cable. Is the KSXER (3.5mm to DB9-F) any different from the standard 3.5mm
to DB9-F that I already own?
Brian KD0HII
__
Elecraft mailing list
Brian,
I don't know which DE-9 to 3.5mm cable that you currently have, but it
is easy to check with an ohmmeter.
Does DE9 pin 5 connect to the shell of the 3.5mm? That is Signal Ground.
Next check DE-9 pin 2 - that should connect to the tip of the 3.5mm plug.
Then DE-9 pin 3 should connect to
Hi,
No compensation is necessary. I have a Ridge Equipment dummy load on one of
my ports and it measures 1.02 with an LP-100A in SWR in bypass mode on 10m.
AB2TC - Knut
Dick Dievendorff-4 wrote
The former.
Dick, K6KR
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9, 2015, at 18:17, Jim Miller lt;
I once did a TDR measurement of the distance between the input and
output in bypass mode.
It comes out to be about 18.Interesting, I would have expected
much less.
73 de Brian/K3KO
On 8/11/2015 16:55 PM, ab2tc wrote:
Hi,
No compensation is necessary. I have a Ridge Equipment dummy load
When the KAT500 is in Bypass are all elements really bypassed?
Or are they bypassed with compensation for the internal paths?
Is there an internal bypass calibration required?
73
jim ab3cv
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
The former.
Dick, K6KR
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9, 2015, at 18:17, Jim Miller j...@jtmiller.com wrote:
When the KAT500 is in Bypass are all elements really bypassed?
Or are they bypassed with compensation for the internal paths?
Is there an internal bypass calibration required?
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 tuner
Message-ID: 54F3584BBB30495B92CC467539701276@Paramount
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8;
reply-type=original
Thanks to all of you who replied to my initial message. I think I'd part
convinced myself that I would prefer the KAT500 and your
: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 9:00 AM
To: G4GNX
Cc: Elecraft Reflector
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 tuner
It would be interesting to compare the toroids and capacitors in both
products. My guess is that they would be similar, and the difference in
ratings is based on the degree to which
It would be interesting to compare the toroids and capacitors in both products.
My guess is that they would be similar, and the difference in ratings is based
on the degree to which the manufacturer wishes to be conservative. As I've said
on numerous occasions, MFJ products are rated in MFJ
Alan -
If you are satisfied with the performance of the MFJ tuner, you can
certainly give it a try. A friend of mine had one to sell a few years ago,
and let me try it on my very NON-resonant antenna. I have a 30' vertical
that requires a tuner on any except 30 meters. The tuner in the K3
: 15Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 02:47:10 +0100
From: G4GNX g4...@theatreorgans.co.uk
To: Elecraft Reflector elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 tuner
Message-ID: D70706FE6C0142C6B7A0CFB5767F3475@Paramount
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252
Hi all.
I am contemplating
: 15Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 02:47:10 +0100From: G4GNX
g4...@theatreorgans.co.ukTo: Elecraft Reflector
elecraft@mailman.qth.netSubject: [Elecraft] KAT500 tunerMessage-ID:
D70706FE6C0142C6B7A0CFB5767F3475@ParamountContent-Type: text/plain;
charset=Windows-1252
Hi all.
I am contemplating purchasing
Hi all.
I am contemplating purchasing a KPA500 amplifier to complement my K3.
I currently have a MFJ 998 tuner which is good for 1.5KW but I think that the
KAT500 tuner from Elecraft will be a superior product. Would this be a sensible
assumption?
If I also buy the KAT500, will it easily
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 won't tune the 6 meter antenna
My KAT500 doesn't tune my 6 meter antenna. I tried it on AUTO mode and
MANUAL mode. The antenna has 13:1 SWR. The KAT500 relays doesn't make noise
when I keyed the K3. Did I miss something?
73
George KE6TE
Sent from my
to improve the match at the aerial.
John G4ZTR
-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net javascript:;]
On Behalf Of George
Rebong
Sent: 05 July 2015 23:15
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net javascript:;
Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 won't tune the 6 meter
My KAT500 doesn't tune my 6 meter antenna. I tried it on AUTO mode and MANUAL
mode. The antenna has 13:1 SWR. The KAT500 relays doesn't make noise when I
keyed the K3. Did I miss something?
73
George KE6TE
Sent from my iPad
__
Yes. Check the KAT500 specs on page 2 of the KAT500 manual. The tuner is
limited to matching no more than a 10:1 SWR in the HF range, and lower at VHF.
Note that this is specified for 500 watts of power, so you may be able to get a
little more. 13:1 indicates a very bad match, however. You will
701 - 800 of 1955 matches
Mail list logo