On 15 Feb 2010, at 00:47, Hector Padron wrote:
Ok guys this is what you all were waiting, a close view of the P3 in
action,thanks to my friend Julio AD4Z who was yesterday at Orlando hamfest
with Eric from Elecraft now we have 11 close pictures and also three
movies,two of them are short
Yeah, we could have an Elecraft Keynote :)
73 Ian
On 15 February 2010 09:36, John Ronan jpron...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 Feb 2010, at 00:47, Hector Padron wrote:
Ok guys this is what you all were waiting, a close view of the P3 in
action,thanks to my friend Julio AD4Z who was yesterday at
This is only interesting for users of CW on the K3.
You might want to check and see if your K3 - like mine #3674 with 3.68 firmware
- produces a badly chirping signal when the VFO is set to a frequency in a very
narrow range of 3525.970 to 3526.030 kHz while the rcvr is using 400 Hz x-tal
Hello Bob,
i have a Kenwood MC-60 and a cheap headset connected to the K3. Also a
Kenwood MC-43 is working very well.
Mabe try this adjustment for a start:
CMP: 18
Mic gain : 30 (depending on the H or L adjustment in the menue)
TX EQ:
50 0
100 +8
200 +4
400 -3
800 -3
1600 +2
2400 +10
3200 +11
Jack W5TMZ send me any picture you want to post and I will do it within my own
webpage in the same folder all the ones are now together with the movies,I will
put a note that they are yours.
AD4C
For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3
--- On Mon, 2/15/10, David Dunn
Hi Hector
Is the maximum displayed bandwidth on the P3 100khz as discussed in the video?
John
--- On Mon, 2/15/10, Hector Padron ad4c2...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Hector Padron ad4c2...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Photo taken at Orlando
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Monday,
I want one - I've wanted one since it was muted, about the 1st week the K3 was
announced.
Now I really WANT one - thanks everyone for taking the pictures.
I think this demonstrates why the 'integral' P3 is a winner over a PC based
Pan-adapter.
BTW, did I say I Want One?
73 de M0XDF, K3 #174
--
Poul Erik Karlshøj (PKA) wrote:
This is only interesting for users of CW on the K3.
You might want to check and see if your K3 - like mine #3674 with 3.68
firmware - produces a badly chirping signal when the VFO is set to a
frequency in a very narrow range of 3525.970 to 3526.030 kHz
Hmmm Steve / Eric - Californian Accent - sounds the same to me!!!
:-)
Great job Elecraft and good vid Eric (and however took it), doing something
like that at the drop of a hat is not easy!
I'll order as soon as you announce we can.
73 de M0XDF, K3 #174
--
I am told I talk in shorthand and
For several reasons I hope it's true, and not just hamfest hype. I'm not
looking for a replacement for my K3 or anything, but I would like to see
Kenwood get back into the HF mix. They do make some good radios when they
set their minds to it (I like my TS-480 for certain situations). There
Kenwood had a exhibit at the Japan Ham Fair last year.
Click on the picture to zoom in...not the clearest photo, but it may be what is
coming.
http://www.onjapan.net/2009/hamfair/kenwood.html
73
Bill, K4CIA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Why do you say that these photos and videos demonstrate why the integral
P3 is a winner over a PC based panadapter? I came to the opposite
conclusion but I'm willing to wait for more information. If you want
to run anything else on the PC based on the K3 IF output, CWSkimmer for
example,
Is the maximum displayed bandwidth on the P3 100khz as discussed in the video?
+/- 100 kHz, thus 200 kHz of spectrum at maximum width.
73,
Lyle KK7P
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Buy, beg, borrow or ste ummm locate a copy of Les Moxon's, G6XN (SK),
book HF Antennas
for All Locations. He provides some options that are worth considering. The
book covers a lot of possibilities for small gardens, typical in the UK
and US.
Don't buy into the 43' vertical hype. It's a good
Talk is cheap...But the fact is, Kenwood, Icom, and Yaesu have had the
ability for a long long time to make receivers with good close-in blocking.
But they always seem to put the dollars into bells and whistles, and lots of
buttons and knobs.
Just like their cars. Glitz over performance
I got the MH2 with my K3 and it works fine but I then bought a NIB Radio
Shack dynamic studio mike (33-3038) off Ebay for $15 and I get great audio
reports. Hooked it up to the rear mic input and use VOX with the mic
mounted on a converted lamp boom. Works as well as a friend's that has $150
Toyotas and glitzy in the same sentence ... interesting.
BMW not glitzy???
On 2/15/2010 11:49 AM, NZ0T wrote:
Talk is cheap...But the fact is, Kenwood, Icom, and Yaesu have had the
ability for a long long time to make receivers with good close-in blocking.
But they always seem to put the
How about glitchy then
matt W6NIA
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:58:52 -0500, you wrote:
Toyotas and glitzy in the same sentence ... interesting.
BMW not glitzy???
On 2/15/2010 11:49 AM, NZ0T wrote:
Talk is cheap...But the fact is, Kenwood, Icom, and Yaesu have had the
ability for a long
--- On Sun, 2/14/10, juergen plebia...@yahoo.com wrote:
I would not be so dismissive of the competition. The emotional value of the
Kenwood name in ham radio is well known. The Kenwood name is still hugely
popular. Who does not comment about kenwood audio quality
You joke about catching up
Considering all the strange looking panels Kenwood has designed recently,
that radio is definately aimed as competition to the K3. So Kenwood can make
a plain looking black box, but will it perform? :)
If they use down conversion with a low first IF, and leave space for a few
roofing filters, it
David wrote...
snip
But personally I cant see much use for one, I tune the radio across the
band and listen for signals as I always have done!!
That's what I thought when I got my Icom 756 ProII. But pretty soon, I found I
was
actually using it to some advantage. The radio
I'm curious to see what this marriage to Motorola may mean as far as the
ham radio division. Hmmm . . . and I thought that marriage was with Yaesu.
I bet Kenwood would be surprised to hear of this.
Bruce - W8FU
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
From: Bruce McLaughlin bmcla...@bex.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Competition
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:13:43 -0500
I'm curious to see what this marriage to Motorola may mean as far as the
ham radio division. Hmmm . . . and I thought that marriage was with Yaesu.
I bet Kenwood would be
I don't know if it has been posted before but I was wondering if should
be possible consider the option to transmit the Callsign (as a
sub-carrier, sub-audible tones, ...) while we are transmiting in order
to open the possibility to the SSB skimmer.
Sincerelly I don't know if there is any
Things aren't going well today, so I may as well voice my opinon here.
FLAME SUIT ON! BLAST AWAY.
I own K3, S/N 3278. Purchased it before I joined the reflector.
I was told that the radio, the support and the reflector were top notch.
Well, 2 out of 3 isn't bad in most cases.
But when there is
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:17:50 -0800 (PST), djmd d...@fuse.net wrote:
See comments in line...
I live in a very standard subdivision-type lot, about 180'x70' with a
single-story 55'x25' house right in the middle. The one option that I have
to rule out is putting the antenna smack-dab in the center
Hello Larry,
No, you've seen same the posts to the reflector as the rest of us.
The number of posts about non-Elecraft radios haven't in any way
reduced the number of Elecraft-related posts. You haven't missed
anything, unless you've chosen not to read something.
LP-PAN and Softrock subjects
I'm trying to write a snippet of code that will grab the KDSP2 firmware
revisions of the DSP and KDSP2 controller. The problem I have is that I
can't seem to grab both of these strings using a DS command.
After sending the appropriate commands to have the version info
displayed, first the DSP
Hi Don,
I tried the same tests with my dummy load connected and got the same lower
output on 15m when transmitting versus pressing Tune.
I increased the output from the audio interface to the rig and the transmitter
output can be adjusted to give normal output. So maybe it just needed a
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:58:38 -0500, Larry - K2GN k...@comcast.net
wrote:
All of us have preferences regarding what we want to read and what we
don't want to read, that is why good email applications have methods
to filter email traffic based on the subject line. Some even will
search the body of
Hi Larry.
There's a lot of chatter that goes on here that is not strictly Elecraft.
You might look into the various ways of viewing the reflector that you can
more easily skip what you don't care for.
You can set your service via qth.net to not forward individual mails.
Here's my preferred
Not compared to the Rice Rockets! ;)
- Original Message -
From: Ted Roycraft [via Elecraft]
To: NZ0T
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: K3 Competition
Toyotas and glitzy in the same sentence ... interesting.
BMW not glitzy???
On 2/15/2010
I may be mistaken, but I don't see Amateur Radio in there future. Check out
the JVC-Kenwood Holdings Website.
http://www.jk-holdings.com/en/corporate/strategy/index.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
I just hope if the P3 is in kit forum, which I like. That one does not
20K worth of test gear and a Masters degree to adjust allinement!
N6XVT
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 14, 2010, at 9:47 PM, Alan Bloom a...@elecraft.com wrote:
The P3 will be available as a no solder kit like the
My K3 #3903 is chirping between 3.525.79 and 3.525.89. It is with the 250Hz
engaged in FL3.
Maybe we should have a 60's chirp night net? :)
Now to find a 50 ohm resistor.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Chirp-on-K3-tp4573921p4576837.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing
N6xvt here,
Sorry, in my last email the word need is needed. But with the P3, any
software will also be for us Mac users.
N6xvt
Sent from my iPhone
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Let's end the AMP thread for now. We are not planning on an 800 or 1500
W solid state amp at this time.
73, Eric WA6HHQ
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
I've had exactly the same reaction. It seems to me that limited functionality,
no matter how exquisitely done, is still limited functionality.
My major disappointment is that, in my admittedly non-expert opinion, the P3
COULD have had similar functionality to an SDR-IQ but for some reason
I like the other topics that come up on the Elecraft web site even if it is
discussion of competitor rigs such as Kenwood or Yaesu. The reason I like this
is that I think the Elecraft community are overall smarter then the average ham
radio operator. I learn a lot in this forum and I am happy
Currently +/- 100 kHz (200 kHz total Span width.)
2 kHz minimum span.
We plan to also add even wider spans by concatenating multiple 200 kHz
scans onto 1 screen. Mostly useful for watching wider bands like 10M for
activity.
I find I personally use +/- 25 kHz or less on CW and +/- 50 to 75 kHz
An automatic highspeed CW callsign at zerobeat during SSB transmission is all
you need.
CW Skimmer will do the rest
73'
Paul
PD0PSB
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/SSB-Skimmer-tp4576274p4577014.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Darn! I was hoping that it would go on the LEFT side of the K3.
Terry W0FM
-Original Message-
From: Dave Quick - KØEKL [mailto:dave.qu...@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 4:57 PM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft P3 panadapter at the Orlando
So.
What about the K4?
Sorry I just couldn't resist.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Elecraft-Amps-tp4555458p4577159.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft
The supplied cables are long enough that you have your choice.
Dick, K6KR
-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Terry Schieler
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 1:16 PM
To: 'Dave Quick - KØEKL';
Well, once again, Dick, it appears that my light-hearted jab at all the
predictors didn't make it through the filter.
:o)
Thanks for the reply nonetheless. My apologies to anyone who took my
comment seriously.
Terry W0FM
-Original Message-
From: Dick Dievendorff
The supplied cables are long enough that you have your choice.
Yes, but don't you have to interchange the if in and if out cables? And
doesn't
the scan run from right-to-left?
And can't you select your own colors (for those who have vonRecklinghausen's
color
blindness)? 8)
You guys are
I find even the lowest level (1 -1) on the noise reduction is too
aggressive especially with weak signals. You can learn to love
digital noise reduction, I had an NIR 10 and used judiciously was very
helpful. This morning trying to work a station in Senegal 6W2SC, I
wished the NR was a
I think the same about NR.
It is great in CW, but a little aggressive with SSB.
My K3 is only 1 month old, is possible after more time i like it also on
ssb.
El 15/02/2010 22:42, Richard Thorpe escribió:
I find even the lowest level (1 -1) on the noise reduction is too
aggressive especially
YUP I'm a K2 nut and don't really care to read about all the
new stuff with the K3. That's why I have filters on my e-mail.
We have a very diverse group of folks here.
Your concerns have come up before. The end result is always the same.
This is Elecraft and Elecraft is the
My major disappointment is that, in my admittedly non-expert opinion, the P3
COULD have had similar functionality to an SDR-IQ but for some reason doesn't.
My major disappointment is that the P3 COULD have been fully equivalent to an
Agilent E4448A,
and have been able to run Skype and
Probably will have, over time. It's software defined. You're talking
about code development in a small company.
And you are talking about ten years of follow-on code development
after purchase if the K2 was any indication.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Dave - AB7E xda...@cis-broadband.com
They put the handle on the wrong side panel!
Mark AD5SS
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Bill McDowell k4...@earthlink.net wrote:
Kenwood had a exhibit at the Japan Ham Fair last year.
Click on the picture to zoom in...not the clearest photo, but it may be what
is coming.
Eric wrote:
Let's end the AMP thread for now. We are not planning on an 800 or 1500
W solid state amp at this time.
73, Eric WA6HHQ
Man, I love it when there is an opening. Notice how Wayne ruled out very
specific power levels. My money is on the 400-500W class amp in the same
sized box as
Because it has a better integration, because I can use it in the field, without
a PC (or laptop connected), because it has a small format (ok, perhaps not
quite as small as a netbook).
Because I haven't yet seen any Mac OSX software to implement a Pan-Adapter.
Because it has a great potential,
I only hope the display matches the K3.. Amber not blue..!!
W4CCS
On 2/15/2010 4:52 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
Probably will have, over time. It's software defined. You're talking
about code development in a small company.
And you are talking about ten years of follow-on code development
Yup. Read and weep. We are a niche. Very much a niche, and a
complaining niche at that.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:07 PM, KE4INM ke4...@gmail.com wrote:
I may be mistaken, but I don't see Amateur Radio in there future. Check out
the JVC-Kenwood Holdings Website.
I remember when the K3 first started being demo'd, Elecraft use some form of
pre-recorded transmissions and a card, to allow them to play that back as RF,
but I don't remember the details - anyone?
73 de M0XDF, K3 #174
--
There is a coherent plan in the universe,
though I don't know what it is
I would be very interested in a 500W amp - legal limit here is 400W, so
something just over that so I didn't overdrive it would be interesting - or
just 400W - as long as 400W was 400W and clean
73 de M0XDF, K3 #174
--
Times are bad. Children no longer obey their parents, and everyone is
Hi Dave
Its probably this system.
http://www.expandedspectrumsystems.com/
John
--- On Mon, 2/15/10, David Ferrington, M0XDF m0...@alphadene.co.uk wrote:
From: David Ferrington, M0XDF m0...@alphadene.co.uk
Subject: [Elecraft] Demo RF card
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Date: Monday,
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 12:32 -0800, Karl Marderian wrote:
N6xvt here,
Sorry, in my last email the word need is needed. But with the P3, any
software will also be for us Mac users.
N6xvt
No software or computer needed. Just plug it into the K3 and turn it
on.
Alan N1AL
not with the handle there!
but I guess you can put it wherever you want :-)
73 de M0XDF, K3 #174
--
God gives every bird his worm, but he does not throw it into the nest.
-Swedish proverb
On 15 Feb 2010, at 21:15, Terry Schieler wrote:
Darn! I was hoping that it would go on the LEFT side of
No alignment is needed. I'll probably include the ability to fine-tune
the amplitude (like the K3 S-meter calibration) and frequency but it's
not necessary.
Alan N1AL
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 12:03 -0800, Karl Marderian wrote:
I just hope if the P3 is in kit forum, which I like. That one does
NZ0T wrote:
The K3 reminds me of a hi performance German car ala BMW.
I think of it as more of a Ferrari. Top performance but to get the best you
need to tweak it.
Not as good at pulling the chicks though. I imagine. Perhaps red paint
should be an option.
-
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3
Elecrafters,
I intend to hook up an external XVTR, so i tried this: I set one VFO to
a 2m-frequency and PWR to the Milliwatt-range, set the other VFO to a
shortwave band and PWR to - say - 100 Watts, then swap A/B to make the
shortwave band VFO B and 2m VFO A.
When swapping the shortwave band back
In a future FW release i would like to see:
K3 does not key KEY OUT if PWR is set above a user-setable level.
This protects your gear (amp) connected to your antenna socket from
excessive drive.
Seamless PWR setting. When the PWR-knob reaches the end of the range,
reading wraps around, e.g.
Firmware? - firmware upgrades?
I think I read that if that was required, the K3 Utility would handle it?
--
Too many parents make life hard for their children by trying, too zealously, to
make it easy for them. -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, poet, dramatist, novelist,
and philosopher (1749-1832)
Surely the comment about tx must use FL1 is wrong, as I understand, it
the tx must transmit through the widest filter. Some, like mine has no
filter in FL1 location
David VK3DBD
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Bob - W0GI b...@gotoloveland.com wrote:
My K3 #3903 is chirping between
Yes, I think it was, thank you
73 de M0XDF, K3 #174
--
Never let your sense of morals get in the way of doing what's right.
-Isaac Asimov, scientist and writer (1920-1992)
On 15 Feb 2010, at 22:20, juergen wrote:
Hi Dave
Its probably this system.
http://www.expandedspectrumsystems.com/
Have you tried F5-1?
Remember that there are two completely different sets of NR settings.
1-1 through 4-4 use a different algorithm than 5-1 through 8-4. You
might find that you prefer one set over the other.
73
--
Joe KB8AP
On Feb 15, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Richard Thorpe wrote:
I find
David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:
Maybe I'm mad, but I also like the idea of staying away from too much
computerisation - I spend 14+ hours a day at a computer - it's my job, as
well as a hobby and I like the idea of it not being dominant in my other
hobbies.
You aren't mad, unless we both
Folks,
I wonder if anyone has an A-B comparison audio recording that shows a SSB
signal that is UNINTELLIGIBLE with NR off become INTELLIGIBLE with NR on?
(Note NR, not NB which is a different animal altogether.)
Maybe it is my ultra-high-noise urban environment, but I have not found any
Hi Martin,
To restore PWR i need to crank up the PWR-knob from Milliwatts to high
PWR or use PFx.
Are you saying that CONFIG:PWR SET = PER-BAND is not working in that
situation?
Other observation: When i switch on TEXT DECODE in CW, the AGC acts
slower. Is this intended?
Yes. See page
Yes. just like the K3.
73, Eric WA6HHQ
On 2/15/2010 2:35 PM, David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:
Firmware? - firmware upgrades?
I think I read that if that was required, the K3 Utility would handle it?
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
Richard, I agree with you. The NR is still not quite up to snuff, at least
my mind. It is my one ongoing pet peeve. I think it is too aggressive for
the lowest settings too. I still favor the way Icon does it with a
continuous variable control starting out with little NR and increasing
without
Hi Oliver
If you like experimenting try this product. I have been using it on the low
bands for a while now, and I am very impressed. I have not found a radio with
an inbuilt DSP that will beat it.
http://www.ing-michels.de/hamradio.html
John
--- On Mon, 2/15/10, O. Johns
Hi Eric
What about transmit monitoring? Or will this be a future option?
Will the P3 have an input for a separate external sampler/coupler for use on
the output of the amplifier?
John
--- On Mon, 2/15/10, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft e...@elecraft.com wrote:
From: Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ,
I'm not sure if you're using SSB or CW, but I have to completely and utterly
disagree with you both on this. The NR for CW, in MY opinion is NOT aggressive
enough. Back around Firmware Version 2.22 (before they really started messing
with the NR) it used to work VERY VERY Well, almost like
Hi John,
Yes, seems impressive. Uses a the envelope shape of the speech waveform to
distinguish it from noise. The examples, however, do not meet the test I asked
about: Is something UNINTELLIGIBLE without the device and then INTELLIGIBLE
with it? Also, it is a bit pricey at some $300 to
I think you are right! I misspoke! It does get confusing.
Dave W7AQK
- Original Message -
From: Bruce McLaughlin bmcla...@bex.net
To: 'David Y.' w7...@cox.net; 'S Sacco' nn4x.st...@gmail.com;
'Elecraft Reflector' Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:13 AM
John...
Is this unit effective on CW? Thanks.
...robert
juergen wrote:
Hi Oliver
If you like experimenting try this product. I have been using it on the low
bands for a while now, and I am very impressed. I have not found a radio with
an inbuilt DSP that will beat it.
As several others have mentioned, I think you would be better served by a
multiband vertical such as a Butterrnut, Hustler, HyGain, etc. As for the
radials, elevated radials are clearly superior to ground radials, as
demonstrated in the March QST. I also speak from personal experience as I
have
I agree with the reply and results that Don got but we are straying off
course. Please can everyone who is involved take this thread to Tower Talk?
I am still try to learn this radio.
73 N7RT
- Original Message -
From: Don - K2PMC k2...@arrl.net
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent:
Hi all,
Made my first contact with my K2 this eve, N6OND, Skip out in San Francisco
(CA).
I have a random wire up in the apt and used my old MFJ tuner with it. I
blew smoke at 10 watts and the bottom of the rig was noticeably warm at
the end of the QSO, so I was really smokin' He gave me a
BTW, my QSO with Skip was on 30M.
LS
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/K2-maiden-flight-tp4578202p4578205.html
Sent from the [K2] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
Personally, I thought both of the little stories were great examples of
American Humour and very funny.
I recognized myself and some of my ham colleagues on this reflector
too! Diversity problems indeed.
And they are in a long and honourable amateur radio tradition --
remember Larson E Rapp
Remember Hashafisti Scratchi?
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please
I'm not so sure I agree! According to the chart, communications equipment
seems to make up about 40% of the Kenwood side of the business. Of course,
they do a lot of non-ham stuff (marine, etc.), but still, if you are in the
communications business, it isn't a huge jump necessarily from one
The team are now back from Hamcation (well, the rest of them are), so
it's now time to open up the room reservations for FDIM 2010 !
For those that are new here, FDIM is 'Four Days In May' and is
organized by QRP ARCI.
The biggest QRP event of the year which runs in parallel with the
Dayton
May be, Others 3% !
KE4INM ke4...@gmail.com 16-02-2010 0:07
I may be mistaken, but I don't see Amateur Radio in there future. Check out
the JVC-Kenwood Holdings Website.
http://www.jk-holdings.com/en/corporate/strategy/index.html
__
On 2/15/10 5:54 PM, lstavenhagen wrote:
One quick question. On a couple of occasions the keyer and power displays
have popped up momentarily on their own as if I'd turned the pots, but I
didn't touch them at the time. I was wondering if perhaps the pots just need
to be worked and are a little
Hi Ken,
We can filter the subject as I do, some external subject do not appear on my
list.
Best regards to Rose.
73's
Philippe A65BI
K3#3616
Ken Kopp k...@rfwave.net 15-02-2010 23:09
Hello Larry,
No, you've seen same the posts to the reflector as the rest of us.
The number of posts about
Hi Ken,
We can filter the subject as I do, some external subject do not appear on my
list.
Best regards to Rose.
73's
Philippe A65BI
Ken Kopp k...@rfwave.net 15-02-2010 23:09
Hello Larry,
No, you've seen same the posts to the reflector as the rest of us.
The number of posts about
I know it's a long shot but I need a KXPD1, the paddle for the KX1. I can
order a new one, but I thought I'd check here first in case some one has one
they are not using.
Contact me off list at
pasek...@umn.edu
tnx
de George
WD0AKZ
--
View this message in context:
I found one :jumping:
Thanks to those that replied.
73's
de George
WD0AKZ
dit-dit
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Wanted-KX1-tp4542255p4578415.html
Sent from the [KX1] mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Ah Ah... P3 must have a bidet with a rotary jet and brakes on the spare wheel
!!
Next time some will ask for planet diversity.
73's
Philippe A65BI
K3#3616
* Elecraft, by Hams, for Hams...What else ?
n...@tx.rr.com 16-02-2010 1:49
My major disappointment is that, in my admittedly non-expert
Eric,
O.K. I'm glad you ended the speculation. But, just to make sure, and so
that folks won't try to parse your statement, would you clarify that a bit
further to say that you are not contemplating ANY amplifiers at this time,
not just 800 and 1500 watt amplifiers?
Dave W7AQK
-
I have both the 250 and 400 Hz filters. I never use the 400 Hz filter
for cw [want to buy it?]
I have no trouble tuning across the band with the 250 Hz filter - the
signals just pop in and out very nicely.
Maybe it's due to the very steep skirts of the filters.
eric
VA7DZ
K3 3640
--
This
I am building a K2 for a friend who bought it about 10 years ago. S/N 1988.
I am ready to start on the KSB2 module, but am confused about which
documentation to follow.
The KSB2 kit came with a Revision C manual. The current KSB2 manual is
Revision E (plus an errata page). Aside from the
If you use a center-fed vertical [like the Sigma 5 I have] you don't
need radials at all. It's just a half-wave dipole
stood up on end.
Much better than the old-fashioned quarter-wave vertical with all its
problems of ground losses.
Needs to be center loaded for 40 but 33 feet is a full
99 matches
Mail list logo
